1
|
García MJ, Riestra S, Amiot A, Julsgaard M, García de la Filia I, Calafat M, Aguas M, de la Peña L, Roig C, Caballol B, Casanova MJ, Farkas K, Boysen T, Bujanda L, Cuarán C, Dobru D, Fousekis F, Gargallo-Puyuelo CJ, Savarino E, Calvet X, Huguet JM, Kupcinskas L, López-Cardona J, Raine T, van Oostrom J, Gisbert JP, Chaparro M. Effectiveness and safety of a third-line rescue treatment for acute severe ulcerative colitis refractory to infliximab or ciclosporin (REASUC study). Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2024; 59:1248-1259. [PMID: 38445785 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The advent of new therapeutic agents and the improvement of supporting care might change the management of acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) and avoid colectomy. AIMS To evaluate the colectomy-free survival and safety of a third-line treatment in patients with ASUC refractory to intravenous steroids and who failed either infliximab or ciclosporin. METHODS Multicentre retrospective cohort study of patients with ASUC refractory to intravenous steroids who had failed infliximab or ciclosporin and received a third-line treatment during the same hospitalisation. Patients who stopped second-line treatment due to disease activity or adverse events (AEs) were eligible. We assessed short-term colectomy-free survival by logistic regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models were used for long-term assessment. RESULTS Among 78 patients, 32 received infliximab and 46 ciclosporin as second-line rescue treatment. Third-line treatment was infliximab in 45 (58%), ciclosporin in 17 (22%), tofacitinib in 13 (17%) and ustekinumab in 3 (3.8%). Colectomy was performed in 29 patients (37%) during follow-up (median 21 weeks). Of the 78 patients, 32 and 18 were in clinical remission at, respectively, 12 and 52 weeks. At the last visit, 25 patients were still on third-line rescue treatment, while 12 had stopped it due to clinical remission. AEs were reported in 26 (33%) patients. Two patients died (2.6%), including one following colectomy. CONCLUSION Third-line rescue treatment avoided colectomy in over half of the patients with ASUC and may be considered a therapeutic strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María José García
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Grupo de Investigación Clínica y Traslacional en Enfermedades Digestivas, Instituto de Investigación Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - Sabino Riestra
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias (ISPA), Oviedo, Spain
| | - Aurelien Amiot
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Bicêtre, Universite Paris Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Mette Julsgaard
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Center for Molecular Prediction of Inflammatory Bowel Disease [PREDICT], Aalborg University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Margalida Calafat
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mariam Aguas
- Gastroenterology Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Health Research Institute La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Luisa de la Peña
- Gastroenterology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Roig
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Berta Caballol
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Barcelona, Spain
| | - María José Casanova
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM) and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
| | - Klaudia Farkas
- Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Trine Boysen
- Gastro Unit, Medical Division, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
- Copenhagen Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children, Adolescents and Adults, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Luis Bujanda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU), San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Camila Cuarán
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Daniela Dobru
- Gastroenterology Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Science and Tehnology "G E Palade" Tg.Mures, Târgu-Mureș, Romania
| | - Fotios Fousekis
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Carla Jerusalén Gargallo-Puyuelo
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Clinic Hospital Lozano Blesa, Institute for Health Research Aragón (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DiSCOG), Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova (AOUP), University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Xavier Calvet
- Gastroenterology Department, Servei d'Aparell Digestiu, Parc Taulí, Hospital Universitari, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí, Departamento de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Sabadell, Spain
| | - José María Huguet
- Digestive Diseases Department, General University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Limas Kupcinskas
- Institute for Digestive Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | | | - Tim Raine
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Joep van Oostrom
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Javier P Gisbert
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM) and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
| | - María Chaparro
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM) and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bor S, Kalkan İH, Savarino E, Rao S, Tack J, Pasricha J, Cangemi D, Schol J, Karunaratne T, Ghisa M, Ahuja NK, Lacy B. Prokinetics-safety and efficacy: The European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility/The American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society expert review. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2024; 36:e14774. [PMID: 38462678 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prokinetics are a class of pharmacological drugs designed to improve gastrointestinal (GI) motility, either regionally or across the whole gut. Each drug has its merits and drawbacks, and based on current evidence as high-quality studies are limited, we have no clear recommendation on one class or other. However, there remains a large unmet need for both regionally selective and/or globally acting prokinetic drugs that work primarily intraluminally and are safe and without systemic side effects. PURPOSE Here, we describe the strengths and weaknesses of six classes of prokinetic drugs, including their pharmacokinetic properties, efficacy, safety and tolerability and potential indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serhat Bor
- Division of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine & Ege Reflux Study Group, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - İsmail H Kalkan
- Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova (AOUP), Padua, Italy
| | - Satish Rao
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Health Center, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jan Tack
- Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jay Pasricha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - David Cangemi
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Jolien Schol
- Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tennekon Karunaratne
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Matteo Ghisa
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Nitin K Ahuja
- Division of Gastroenterology, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Brian Lacy
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Calabrese F, Pasta A, Bodini G, Furnari M, Zentilin P, Giannini EG, Maniero D, Casa DD, Cataudella G, Frazzoni M, Penagini R, Elena A, De Bortoli N, Visaggi P, Savarino V, Savarino E, Marabotto E. Editorial: Diagnosis of GERD in patients with extra-oesophageal symptoms-still a long way to go… Authors' reply'. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2024; 59:1150-1151. [PMID: 38591806 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
LINKED CONTENTThis article is linked to Calabrese et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17934 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17955
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Calabrese
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Andrea Pasta
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giorgia Bodini
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Manuele Furnari
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Patrizia Zentilin
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Edoardo G Giannini
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Daria Maniero
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Domenico Della Casa
- Department of Surgical-Surgery Endoscopy, Spedali Civili, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Marzio Frazzoni
- Digestive Pathophysiology Unit, Baggiovara Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | - Roberto Penagini
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi, Milan, Italy
| | - Arsiè Elena
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola De Bortoli
- Gastrointestinal Unit-Department of Translational Sciences and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Pierfrancesco Visaggi
- Gastrointestinal Unit-Department of Translational Sciences and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Elisa Marabotto
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Calabrese F, Pasta A, Bodini G, Furnari M, Zentilin P, Giannini EG, Maniero D, Della Casa D, Cataudella G, Frazzoni M, Penagini R, Elena A, de Bortoli N, Visaggi P, Savarino V, Savarino E, Marabotto E. Applying Lyon consensus criteria in the work-up of patients with extra-oesophageal symptoms - A multicentre retrospective study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2024; 59:1134-1143. [PMID: 38445690 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) based on otolaryngologist's assessment of laryngoscopic findings remains contentious in terms of sensitivity and specificity. AIMS To evaluate GERD prevalence, applying Lyon 2.0 Consensus criteria, in patients with extra-oesophageal symptoms undergoing laryngoscopic examination and impedance-pH monitoring. METHODS In this retrospective assessment, we included 470 patients with extra-oesophageal symptoms, either isolated or combined with typical symptoms, who had been referred to six tertiary Italian Gastroenterology Units between January and December 2020. Of these, 274 underwent 24-h impedance-pH monitoring and laryngoscopy off PPI therapy. GERD diagnosis followed Lyon Consensus 2.0 criteria, incorporating mean nocturnal baseline impedance when pH-impedance monitoring was inconclusive. RESULTS Laryngoscopic examination revealed pathological findings (predominantly posterior laryngitis) in 71.2% (195/274). GERD was diagnosed in 29.2% (80/274) via impedance-pH monitoring. The prevalence of GERD in patients with positive or negative laryngoscopy was similar (32.3% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.075). No significant difference in proximal reflux occurrences was noted between positive and negative laryngoscopy groups (33.3% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.133). Laryngoscopy demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 78.8% and 32.0%, respectively, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 32.3% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 28.4%. In contrast, a threshold of four concurrent laryngoscopic signs, identified in only eight patients, demonstrated a PPV of 93.8% and a NPV of 73.6% (sensitivity 25.4%, specificity 99.2%). CONCLUSION This study underscores the limited diagnostic accuracy of laryngoscopy, emphasising the necessity of impedance-pH monitoring for confirming GERD diagnoses using Lyon 2.0 criteria in patients with suspected extra-oesophageal symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Calabrese
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Andrea Pasta
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giorgia Bodini
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Manuele Furnari
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Patrizia Zentilin
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Edoardo G Giannini
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Daria Maniero
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Domenico Della Casa
- Department of Surgical-Surgery Endoscopy, Spedali Civili, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Marzio Frazzoni
- Digestive Pathophysiology Unit, Baggiovara Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | - Roberto Penagini
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi, Milan, Italy
| | - Arsiè Elena
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola de Bortoli
- Gastrointestinal Unit-Department of Translational Sciences and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Pierfrancesco Visaggi
- Gastrointestinal Unit-Department of Translational Sciences and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Elisa Marabotto
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ribolsi M, De Bortoli N, Frazzoni M, Marchetti L, Savarino E, Cicala M. Proximal esophageal impedance baseline increases the yield of impedance-pH and is associated with response to PPIs in chronic cough patients. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2024; 36:e14775. [PMID: 38424679 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic cough significantly impairs the quality of life. Although various studies focused on MNBI as assessed in the distal esophagus, scarce data are available on the clinical value of proximal measurements. AIM To investigate the role of proximal MNBI in the workup of patients with chronic cough and its ability to predict PPI response. METHODS Demographic, clinical, endoscopy findings, impedance-pH and HRM tracings from consecutive cough patients were evaluated. MNBI was calculated at proximal and distal esophagus. RESULTS One hundred and sixty four patients were included. In addition to traditional variables, when considering also the PSPW index or MNBI at 3 cm or 15 cm, the proportion of patients with pathological impedance-pH monitoring significantly increased. 70/164 patients were responders, while 94 (57.3%) were non-responder to double PPI dose (p < 0.05). Patients with pathologic MNBI at 3 cm and/or 15 cm as well as those with pathologic PSPW index were characterized by a significantly higher proportion of responders than that observed among patients with normal impedance-pH variables (p < 0.001). The proportion of responders with pathological MNBI at 15 cm was significantly higher than the proportion of responders with pathological MNBI at 3 cm (82.8% vs. 64.3%, p < 0.05). At multivariable model, pathological MNBI at both 3 cm and 15 cm as well as PSPW index were associated with PPI responsiveness. The strongest association with PPI response was observed for MNBI at 15 cm. CONCLUSIONS The assessment of MNBI at proximal esophagus increases the diagnostic yield of impedance-pH monitoring and may represent a useful predictor of PPI responsiveness in the cumbersome clinical setting of suspected reflux-related cough.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mentore Ribolsi
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Roma, Italy
| | - Nicola De Bortoli
- Department of New Technologies and Translational Research in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marzio Frazzoni
- Digestive Pathophysiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara, Modena, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Marchetti
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Roma, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua School of Medicine and Surgery, Padova, Italy
| | - Michele Cicala
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Angerilli V, Vanoli A, Celin G, Ceccon C, Gasparello J, Sabbadin M, De Lisi G, Paudice M, Lenti MV, Rovedatti L, Di Sabatino A, Bazzocchi F, Lonardi S, Savarino E, Luchini C, Parente P, Grillo F, Mastracci L, Fassan M. Gastric carcinoma in autoimmune gastritis: a histopathologic and molecular study. Mod Pathol 2024:100491. [PMID: 38588886 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
Patients with autoimmune gastritis (AIG) have a 13-fold risk of developing type-1 neuroendocrine tumors, whereas the risk for gastric adenocarcinoma is still uncertain. Here we describe the clinicopathological and molecular features of a series of gastric carcinomas (GC) arising in the context of AIG. A total of 26 AIG-associated GC specimens were collected from four Italian Institutions. Immunohistochemistry for MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC6, CDX2, HER2, PD-L1, CLDN18, Mismatch Repair (MMR) proteins, and p53 and EBER in situ hybridization were performed. Histologic features and IHC were jointly reviewed by five expert gastrointestinal pathologists. Next-generation sequencing analysis (TrueSight Oncology 500, Illumina) of 523 cancer-related genes was performed on 19 cases. Most tumors were diagnosed as pT1 (52%), were located in the corpus/fundus (58%) and were associated with OLGA stage II gastritis (80.8%), absence of parietal cells, complete intestinal metaplasia and ECL-cell micronodular hyperplasia. Only 4 (15.4%) GCs were diagnosed during follow-up for AIG. The following histotypes were identified: 20 (77%) adenocarcinomas; 3 (11%) mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms, and 2 (8%) high-grade solid adenocarcinomas with focal neuroendocrine component, 1 (4%) adenocarcinoma with an amphicrine component. Overall, 7 cases (27%) showed MMR deficiency, 3 (12%) were positive (score 3+) for HER2, 6 (23%) were CLDN18 positive, and 11 (42%) had PD-L1 Combined Positive Score ≥ 10. EBER was negative in all cases. Molecular analysis revealed 5/19 (26%) MSI cases and 7 (37%) TMB-high. The most frequently altered genes were: TP53 (8/19, 42%), RNF43 (7/19, 37%), ERBB2 (7/19, 37% [two amplified and five mutated cases]), ARID1A (6/19, 32%), and PIK3CA (4/19, 21%). In summary, AIG-associated GCs are often diagnosed at low stage in patients with long-standing misrecognized severe AIG; they often display a neuroendocrine component or differentiation, have relatively higher rates of MMR deficiency, and TMB-high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Angerilli
- Department of Medicine, Surgical Pathology Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Alessandro Vanoli
- Anatomic Pathology Unit, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Anatomic Pathology Unit, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giulia Celin
- Department of Medicine, Surgical Pathology Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Carlotta Ceccon
- Department of Medicine, Surgical Pathology Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Jessica Gasparello
- Department of Medicine, Surgical Pathology Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe De Lisi
- Anatomic Pathology Unit, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Michele Paudice
- Anatomic Pathology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DICS), University of Genova, Italy; Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genova, Italy
| | - Marco Vincenzo Lenti
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Therapeutics, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; First Department of Internal Medicine, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Laura Rovedatti
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Antonio Di Sabatino
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Therapeutics, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; First Department of Internal Medicine, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesca Bazzocchi
- Surgical Abdominal Unit; Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - Sara Lonardi
- Department of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Claudio Luchini
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Paola Parente
- Pathology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo (FG) Italy
| | - Federica Grillo
- Anatomic Pathology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DICS), University of Genova, Italy; Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genova, Italy
| | - Luca Mastracci
- Anatomic Pathology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DICS), University of Genova, Italy; Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genova, Italy
| | - Matteo Fassan
- Department of Medicine, Surgical Pathology Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy; Veneto Institute of Oncology, IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Baker FA, Savarino E, Ahmad HS, Zeina AR, Abboud W, Khoury T, Natour RT, Kopelman Y, Mari A. Comprehensive Assessment of Esophageal Disorders Associated with Hiatus Hernia: Insights from Big Data Analysis. Dysphagia 2024:10.1007/s00455-023-10642-6. [PMID: 38285232 DOI: 10.1007/s00455-023-10642-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
Hiatus hernia (HH) is a prevalent endoscopic finding in clinical practice, frequently co-occurring with esophageal disorders, yet the prevalence and degree of association remain uncertain. We aim to investigate HH's frequency and its suspected association with esophageal disorders. We reviewed endoscopic reports of over 75,000 consecutive patients who underwent gastroscopy over 12 years in two referral centers. HH was endoscopically diagnosed. We derived data on clinical presentation and a comprehensive assessment of benign and malignant esophageal pathologies. We performed multiple regression models to identify esophageal sequela associated with HH. The overall frequency of HH was (16.8%); the majority (89.5%) had small HHs (<3 cm). Female predominance was documented in HH patients, who were significantly older than controls (61.1±16.5 vs. 52.7±20.0; P < 0.001). The outcome analysis of esophageal pathology revealed an independent association between HH, regardless of its size, and erosive reflux esophagitis (25.7% vs. 6.2%; OR = 3.8; P < 0.001) and Barrett's esophagus (3.8% vs. 0.7%; OR = 4.7, P < 0.001). Furthermore, following rigorous age and sex matching, in conjunction with additional multivariable analyses, large HHs were associated with higher rates of benign esophageal strictures (3.6% vs. 0.3%; P < 0.001), Mallory Weiss syndrome (3.6% vs. 2.1%; P = 0.01), and incidents of food impactions (0.9% vs. 0.2%; P = 0.014). In contrast, a lower rate of achalasia was noted among this cohort (0.55% vs. 0%; P = 0.046). Besides reflux-related esophageal disorders, we outlined an association with multiple benign esophageal disorders, particularly in patients with large HHs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fadi Abu Baker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Helal Said Ahmad
- Department of Gastroenterology, Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Nazareth EMMS Hospital, Bar Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| | - Abdel-Rauf Zeina
- Department of Radiology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel
| | - Wisam Abboud
- Department of Surgery, Nazareth Hospital, EMMS, Nazareth, Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Tawfik Khoury
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine in the Galilee, Galilee Medical Center, Bar-Ilan University, Nahariya, Safed, Israel
| | - Randa Taher Natour
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel.
| | - Yael Kopelman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel
| | - Amir Mari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Nazareth EMMS Hospital, Bar Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gordon H, Burisch J, Ellul P, Karmiris K, Katsanos K, Allocca M, Bamias G, Barreiro-de Acosta M, Braithwaite T, Greuter T, Harwood C, Juillerat P, Lobaton T, Müller-Ladner U, Noor N, Pellino G, Savarino E, Schramm C, Soriano A, Michael Stein J, Uzzan M, van Rheenen PF, Vavricka SR, Vecchi M, Zuily S, Kucharzik T. ECCO Guidelines on Extraintestinal Manifestations in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Crohns Colitis 2024; 18:1-37. [PMID: 37351850 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Gordon
- Department of Gastroenterology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Barts & The London Medical School, Queen Mary University of London, UK
| | - Johan Burisch
- Gastrounit, medical division, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children, Adolescents and Adults, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Pierre Ellul
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
| | | | - Konstantinos Katsanos
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Division of Internal Medicine, University and Medical School of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Mariangela Allocca
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgos Bamias
- GI Unit, 3rd Academic Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sotiria Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta
- University Hospital Santiago De Compostela CHUS, Department of Gastroenterology - IBD Unit, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
| | - Tasanee Braithwaite
- School of Immunology and Microbiology, King's College London, The Medical Eye Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Thomas Greuter
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, GZO - Zurich Regional Health Center, Wetzikon, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Lausanne - CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Catherine Harwood
- Centre for Cell Biology and Cutaneous Research, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London; Department of Dermatology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Pascal Juillerat
- Gastroenterology, Clinic for Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland; Crohn and Colitis Center, Gastro-entérologie Beaulieu SA, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Triana Lobaton
- Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent; Department of Gastroenterology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ulf Müller-Ladner
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Campus Kerckhoff, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Bad Nauheim, Germany
| | - Nurulamin Noor
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona UAB, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Naples, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy; Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Christoph Schramm
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Martin Zeitz Center for Rare Diseases, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Hamburg Center for Translational Immunology (HCTI), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alessandra Soriano
- Gastroenterology Division and IBD Center, Internal Medicine Department, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Jürgen Michael Stein
- Interdisciplinary Crohn Colitis Centre Rhein-Main, Frankfurt/Main, Department of Gastroenterology and Clinical Nutrition, DGD Clinics Sachsenhausen, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Mathieu Uzzan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, APHP, Créteil, France
| | - Patrick F van Rheenen
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Stephan R Vavricka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Maurizio Vecchi
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stephane Zuily
- Vascular Medicine Division and French Referral Center for Rare Auto-Immune Diseases, Université de Lorraine, INSERM, DCAC and CHRU-Nancy, Nancy, France
| | - Torsten Kucharzik
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lüneburg Hospital, University of Münster, Lüneburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kamal AN, Kathpalia P, Leiman DA, Bredenoord AJ, Clarke JO, Gyawali CP, Katzka DA, Lazarescu A, Pandolfino JE, Penagini R, Roman S, Savarino E, Vela MF, Otaki F. Quality Indicator Development for the Approach to Ineffective Esophageal Motility: A Modified Delphi Study. J Clin Gastroenterol 2024:00004836-990000000-00251. [PMID: 38227852 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
GOALS Develop quality indicators for ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). BACKGROUND IEM is identified in up to 20% of patients undergoing esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) based on the Chicago Classification. The clinical significance of this pattern is not established and management remains challenging. STUDY Using RAND/University of California, Los Angeles Appropriateness Methods, we employed a modified-Delphi approach for quality indicator statement development. Quality indicators were proposed based on prior literature. Experts independently and blindly scored proposed quality statements on importance, scientific acceptability, usability, and feasibility in a 3-round iterative process. RESULTS All 10 of the invited esophageal experts in the management of esophageal diseases invited to participate rated 12 proposed quality indicator statements. In round 1, 7 quality indicators were rated with mixed agreement, on the majority of categories. Statements were modified based on panel suggestion, modified further following round 2's virtual discussion, and in round 3 voting identified 2 quality indicators with comprehensive agreement, 4 with partial agreement, and 1 without any agreement. The panel agreed on the concept of determining if IEM is clinically relevant to the patient's presentation and managing gastroesophageal reflux disease rather than the IEM pattern; they disagreed in all 4 domains on the use of promotility agents in IEM; and had mixed agreement on the value of a finding of IEM during anti-reflux surgical planning. CONCLUSION Using a robust methodology, 2 IEM quality indicators were identified. These quality indicators can track performance when physicians identify this manometric pattern on HRM. This study further highlights the challenges met with IEM and the need for additional research to better understand the clinical importance of this manometric pattern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afrin N Kamal
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Redwood City
| | - Priya Kathpalia
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - David A Leiman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University School of Medicine & Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Albert J Bredenoord
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - John O Clarke
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Redwood City
| | - C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - David A Katzka
- Division of Gastroenterology, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Adriana Lazarescu
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - John E Pandolfino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Roberto Penagini
- Gastroenterology Unit, University of Milan, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Sabine Roman
- Digestive Physiology, Lyon I Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology,University of Padua, Padua, Veneto, Italy
| | - Marcelo F Vela
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Fouad Otaki
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gyawali CP, Yadlapati R, Fass R, Katzka D, Pandolfino J, Savarino E, Sifrim D, Spechler S, Zerbib F, Fox MR, Bhatia S, de Bortoli N, Cho YK, Cisternas D, Chen CL, Cock C, Hani A, Remes Troche JM, Xiao Y, Vaezi MF, Roman S. Updates to the modern diagnosis of GERD: Lyon consensus 2.0. Gut 2024; 73:361-371. [PMID: 37734911 PMCID: PMC10846564 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
The Lyon Consensus provides conclusive criteria for and against the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and adjunctive metrics that consolidate or refute GERD diagnosis when primary criteria are borderline or inconclusive. An international core and working group was assembled to evaluate research since publication of the original Lyon Consensus, and to vote on statements collaboratively developed to update criteria. The Lyon Consensus 2.0 provides a modern definition of actionable GERD, where evidence from oesophageal testing supports revising, escalating or personalising GERD management for the symptomatic patient. Symptoms that have a high versus low likelihood of relationship to reflux episodes are described. Unproven versus proven GERD define diagnostic strategies and testing options. Patients with no prior GERD evidence (unproven GERD) are studied using prolonged wireless pH monitoring or catheter-based pH or pH-monitoring off antisecretory medication, while patients with conclusive GERD evidence (proven GERD) and persisting symptoms are evaluated using pH-impedance monitoring while on optimised antisecretory therapy. The major changes from the original Lyon Consensus criteria include establishment of Los Angeles grade B oesophagitis as conclusive GERD evidence, description of metrics and thresholds to be used with prolonged wireless pH monitoring, and inclusion of parameters useful in diagnosis of refractory GERD when testing is performed on antisecretory therapy in proven GERD. Criteria that have not performed well in the diagnosis of actionable GERD have been retired. Personalisation of investigation and management to each patient's unique presentation will optimise GERD diagnosis and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Rena Yadlapati
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California in San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Ronnie Fass
- Medicine/Section of Gastroenterology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - David Katzka
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - John Pandolfino
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, University of Padua, Padova, Italy
| | - Daniel Sifrim
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | - Stuart Spechler
- Division of Gastroenterology, Baylor Scott and White North Texas, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Frank Zerbib
- Gastroenterology, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Mark R Fox
- Gastroenterology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Yu Kyung Cho
- Gastroenterology, Catholic University of Korea - Songsin Campus, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
| | - Daniel Cisternas
- Digestive System Research Unit, Universidad del Desarrollo Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana, Las Condes, Chile
| | - Chien-Lin Chen
- Department of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Charles Cock
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Albis Hani
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia
| | | | - Yinglian Xiao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sun Yan-sen University of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Michael F Vaezi
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Sabine Roman
- Department of Digestive Physiology, Universite de Lyon, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ribolsi M, Marchetti L, Savarino E, Gyawali CP, Cicala M. Chicago Classification v4.0 Stratifies Acid Burden and Abnormal Impedance-pH Variables Better Than Chicago Classification v3.0 Chicago Classification v4.0 and GERD. Am J Gastroenterol 2024; 119:206-209. [PMID: 37655704 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) severity increases with esophageal body hypomotility, but the impact of Chicago Classification (CC) v4.0 criteria on GERD diagnosis is incompletely understood. METHODS In patients with GERD evaluated with high-resolution manometry and pH-impedance monitoring, CCv3.0 and CCv4.0 diagnoses were compared. RESULTS In 247 patients, hypomotility diagnosis decreased from 45.3% (CCv3.0) to 30.0% (CCv4.0, P < 0.001). In contrast, within patients with ineffective esophageal motility, proportions with pathological acid exposure increased from 38% (CCv3.0) to 88% (CCv4.0); baseline impedance and esophageal clearance demonstrated similar findings ( P < 0.05 for each comparison). DISCUSSION CCv4.0 hypomotility criteria are more specific in supporting GERD evidence compared with CCv3.0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mentore Ribolsi
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Roma, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Marchetti
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Roma, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padova, Italy
| | - C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
| | - Michele Cicala
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Marabotto E, Pasta A, Calabrese F, Bodini G, Furnari M, Giannini EG, Savarino E. Is global score better than a single histological parameter for assessing microscopic esophagitis? Neurogastroenterol Motil 2024; 36:e14685. [PMID: 37793137 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Marabotto
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Andrea Pasta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesco Calabrese
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giorgia Bodini
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Manuele Furnari
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Edoardo Giovanni Giannini
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ardizzone S, Armuzzi A, Caprioli F, Castiglione F, Danese S, Daperno M, Fantini MC, Fries W, Principi MB, Savarino E, Gionchetti P. Timing of proper introduction, optimization and maintenance of anti-TNF therapy in IBD: Results from a Delphi consensus. Dig Liver Dis 2024; 56:98-105. [PMID: 37741750 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) with a rapidly growing worldwide incidence. The last decades presented rapid progress in pharmacological treatment leading in many cases to clinical and endoscopic remission, including biological treatment with anti-TNF agents. AIM The exact timing of introduction, optimization and maintenance of anti-TNF therapy in IBDs is not thoroughly covered in current guidelines. METHODS We used the Delphi panel methodology to gather the IBD experts' views and achieve consensus for clinical recommendations on introducing and maintaining anti-TNF therapy for patients with IBDs. RESULTS Twelve recommendations achieved a high level of consensus in two assessment rounds by 52 (1st round) and 47 (2nd round) IBD experts. CONCLUSION In many clinical situations, the early use of anti-TNF therapy is recommended. Nowadays, the cost-efficacy profile of anti-TNF biosimilars makes them the first-line drug in a substantial proportion of patients, thus providing the opportunity to increase access to biological therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandro Ardizzone
- Gastrointestinal Unit ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco-University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Armuzzi
- IBD Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano (Milan), Italy - Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele (Milan), Italy
| | - Flavio Caprioli
- Dept. of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabiana Castiglione
- Department of clinical medicine and surgery, AOU Federico II hospital, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Marco Daperno
- Gastroenterology Unit, AO Ordine Mauriziano of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Walter Fries
- Gastroenterology Unit, Dept. of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Maria Beatrice Principi
- Gastroenterology Unit, Dept. of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, AOU University of Padua, Padua, Italy - Dept. of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Paolo Gionchetti
- IBD Unit, IRCCS AOU of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; DIMEC University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tursi A, Mocci G, Scaldaferri F, Napolitano D, Maresca R, Pugliese D, Semprucci G, Savarino E, Cuomo A, Donnarumma L, Bodini G, Pasta A, Maconi G, Cataletti G, Pranzo G, Rodinò S, Sebkova L, Costa F, Ferronato A, Gaiani F, Marzo M, Luppino I, Fabiano G, Paese P, Elisei W, Monterubbianesi R, Faggiani R, Grossi L, Serio M, Scarcelli A, Lorenzetti R, Allegretta L, Chiri S, Grasso G, Antonelli E, Bassotti G, Spagnuolo R, Luzza F, Fanigliulo L, Rocco G, Sacchi C, Zampaletta C, Rocchi C, Bolognini L, Bendia E, Bianco MA, Capone P, Meucci C, Colucci R, Tonti P, Neve V, Della Valle N, Felice C, Pica R, Cocco A, Forti G, Onidi FM, Usai Satta P, Checchin D, Gravina AG, Pellegrino R, Picchio M, Papa A. Ustekinumab safety and effectiveness in patients with ulcerative colitis: results from a large real-life study. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2024; 24:101-109. [PMID: 38250818 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2024.2309300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ustekinumab (UST) is an interleukin-12/interleukin-23 receptor antagonist recently approved for treating ulcerative colitis (UC) but with limited real-world data. Therefore, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of UST in patients with UC in a real-world setting. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This is a multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study. The primary endpoints were the clinical remission rate (partial Mayo score, PMS, ≤1) and the safety of UST. Other endpoints were corticosteroid-free remission (CSFR) rate, clinical response rate (PMS reduction of at least 2 points), and fecal calprotectin (FC) reduction at week 24. RESULTS We included 256 consecutive patients with UC (M/F 139/117, median age 52). The clinical remission and clinical response rates at eight weeks were 18.7% (44/235) and 53.2% (125/235), respectively, and 27.6% (42/152) and 61.8% (94/152) at 24 weeks, respectively. At 24 weeks, CSFR was 20.3% (31/152), and FC significantly dropped at week 12 (p = 0.0004) and 24 (p = 0.038). At eight weeks, patients naïve or with one previous biologic treatment showed higher remission (p = 0.002) and clinical >response rates (p = 0.018) than patients previously treated with ≥ 2. Adverse events occurred in six patients (2.3%), whereas four patients (1.6%) underwent colectomy. CONCLUSION This real-world study shows that UST effectively and safely treats patients with UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Tursi
- Territorial Gastroenterology Service, ASL BAT, Andria, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Giammarco Mocci
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Brotzu" Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Franco Scaldaferri
- Digestive Diseases Centre (CEMAD), Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" Foundation, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- School of Medicine, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Napolitano
- Digestive Diseases Centre (CEMAD), Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" Foundation, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Rossella Maresca
- Digestive Diseases Centre (CEMAD), Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" Foundation, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Pugliese
- Digestive Diseases Centre (CEMAD), Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" Foundation, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- School of Medicine, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Semprucci
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova (AOUP), Padua, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova (AOUP), Padua, Italy
| | - Antonio Cuomo
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Umberto I" Hospital, Nocera Inferiore (SA), Italy
| | - Laura Donnarumma
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Umberto I" Hospital, Nocera Inferiore (SA), Italy
| | - Giorgia Bodini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS "San Martino" Hospital, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Andrea Pasta
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS "San Martino" Hospital, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giovanni Maconi
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, "L. Sacco" University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Cataletti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, "L. Sacco" University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Pranzo
- Ambulatory for IBD Treatment, "Valle D'Itria" Hospital, Martina Franca (TA), Italy
| | - Stefano Rodinò
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Ciaccio-Pugliese" Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Ladislava Sebkova
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Ciaccio-Pugliese" Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Francesco Costa
- IBD Unit, Department of General Surgery and Gastroenterology, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Antonio Ferronato
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Hospital of Santorso, ULSS7, Santorso (VI), Italy
| | - Federica Gaiani
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Manuela Marzo
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Veris-Delli Ponti" Hospital, Scorrano (LE), Italy
| | - Ileana Luppino
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Annunziata" Hospital, Cosenza, Italy
| | - Giulia Fabiano
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Annunziata" Hospital, Cosenza, Italy
| | - Pietro Paese
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Annunziata" Hospital, Cosenza, Italy
| | - Walter Elisei
- Division of Gastroenterology, A.O. "S. Camillo-Folanini", Rome, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Faggiani
- Division of Gastroenterology, A.O. "S. Camillo-Folanini", Rome, Italy
| | - Laurino Grossi
- Gastroenterology Unit, "Spirito Santo" Hospital, "G d'Annunzio" University, Pescara, Italy
| | - Mariaelena Serio
- Division of Gastroenterology, "San Salvatore" Hospital, Pesaro, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Lorenzetti
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Nuovo Regina Margherita" Territorial Hospital, Roma, Italy
| | - Leonardo Allegretta
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Santa Caterina Novella" Hospital, Galatina (LE), Italy
| | - Stefania Chiri
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Santa Caterina Novella" Hospital, Galatina (LE), Italy
| | - Giuseppina Grasso
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Santa Caterina Novella" Hospital, Galatina (LE), Italy
| | - Elisabetta Antonelli
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Gabrio Bassotti
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Rocco Spagnuolo
- Department of Health Science, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Francesco Luzza
- Department of Health Science, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Libera Fanigliulo
- Division of Gastroenterology, "S.S. Annunziata" Hospital, Taranto, Italy
| | - Giulia Rocco
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Belcolle" Hospital, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Carlotta Sacchi
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Belcolle" Hospital, Viterbo, Italy
| | | | - Chiara Rocchi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, "Mater Olbia" Hospital, Olbia (SS), Italy
| | - Laura Bolognini
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Digestive Endoscopy and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, A.O. "Ospedali Riuniti", Ancona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Bendia
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Digestive Endoscopy and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, A.O. "Ospedali Riuniti", Ancona, Italy
| | - Maria Antonia Bianco
- Division of Gastroenterology, "T. Maresca" Hospital, Torre del Greco (NA), Italy
| | - Pietro Capone
- Division of Gastroenterology, "T. Maresca" Hospital, Torre del Greco (NA), Italy
| | - Costantino Meucci
- Division of Gastroenterology, "T. Maresca" Hospital, Torre del Greco (NA), Italy
| | - Raffaele Colucci
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, "San Matteo degli Infermi" Hospital, Spoleto (PG), Italy
| | - Paolo Tonti
- Division of Gastroenterology, "A. Perrino" Hospital, Brindisi, Italy
| | - Viviana Neve
- Division of Gastroenterology, "A. Perrino" Hospital, Brindisi, Italy
| | | | - Carla Felice
- Division of Internal Medicine, "Ca' Foncello" University Hospital, Treviso, Italy
| | - Roberta Pica
- Division of Gastroenterology, IBD Unit, "S. Pertini" Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Cocco
- Division of Gastroenterology, IBD Unit, "S. Pertini" Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Giacomo Forti
- Division of Digestive Endoscopy, "S. Maria Goretti" Hospital, Latina, Italy
| | | | | | - Davide Checchin
- Division of Gastroenterology, " S Giovanni e Paolo" Hospital, Mestre - Venezia, Italy
| | - Antonietta Gerarda Gravina
- Department of Precision Medicine, Hepatogastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Raffaele Pellegrino
- Department of Precision Medicine, Hepatogastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Marcello Picchio
- Division of General Surgery, "P. Colombo" Hospital, ASL Roma 6, Velletri (Roma), Italy
| | - Alfredo Papa
- Digestive Diseases Centre (CEMAD), Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" Foundation, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- School of Medicine, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sawada A, Zhang M, Ustaoglu A, Nikaki K, Lee C, Woodland P, Yazaki E, Takashima S, Ominami M, Tanaka F, Ciafardini C, Nachman F, Ditaranto A, Agotegaray J, Bilder C, Savarino E, Gyawali CP, Penagini R, Fujiwara Y, Sifrim D. Superficial oesophageal mucosal innervation may contribute to severity of symptoms in oesophageal motility disorders. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2024; 59:100-112. [PMID: 37845817 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mechanisms underlying perception of dysphagia and chest pain have not been completely elucidated, although oesophageal mucosal afferent nerves might play an important role. AIMS To evaluate the relationship between oesophageal mucosal afferent nerves and the severity of dysphagia and chest pain in oesophageal motility disorders. METHODS We prospectively recruited patients with oesophageal motility disorders having dysphagia and/or chest pain from whom oesophageal biopsies were obtained. High-resolution manometry classified patients into disorders of oesophagogastric junction (OGJ) outflow and disorders of peristalsis. Symptom severity was assessed using validated questionnaires including Brief Oesophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire (BEDQ). Immunohistochemistry was performed on oesophageal biopsies to evaluate the location of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-immunoreactive mucosal afferent nerves. Findings were compared to existing data from 10 asymptomatic healthy volunteers. RESULTS Of 79 patients, 61 patients had disorders of OGJ outflow and 18 had disorders of peristalsis. CGRP-immunoreactive mucosal nerves were more superficially located in the mucosa of patients with oesophageal motility disorders compared to healthy volunteers. Within disorders of OGJ outflow, the location of CGRP-immunoreactive nerves negatively correlated with BEDQ score both in the proximal (ρ = -0.567, p < 0.001) and distal oesophagus (ρ = -0.396, p = 0.003). In the proximal oesophagus, strong chest pain was associated with more superficially located mucosal nerves than weak chest pain (p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis showed superficial nerves in the proximal oesophagus was independently associated with severe dysphagia in disorders of OGJ outflow (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS Superficial location of mucosal nerves in the proximal oesophagus might contribute to symptoms, especially severe dysphagia, in disorders of OGJ outflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akinari Sawada
- Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Mengyu Zhang
- Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK
| | - Ahsen Ustaoglu
- Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK
| | - Kornilia Nikaki
- Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK
| | - Chung Lee
- Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK
| | - Philip Woodland
- Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK
| | - Etsuro Yazaki
- Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK
| | - Shingo Takashima
- Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masaki Ominami
- Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Fumio Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Clorinda Ciafardini
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Nachman
- Fundacion Favaloro Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | | | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Roberto Penagini
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Yasuhiro Fujiwara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Daniel Sifrim
- Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Visaggi P, De Bortoli N, Savarino E. Efficacy of dupilumab in patients with prior exposure to topical steroids: facing second-line treatments for eosinophilic oesophagitis. Gut 2023:gutjnl-2023-331674. [PMID: 38135492 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-331674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Pierfrancesco Visaggi
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Nicola De Bortoli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ferrante M, Pouillon L, Mañosa M, Savarino E, Allez M, Kapizioni C, Arebi N, Carvello M, Myrelid P, De Vries AC, Rivière P, Panis Y, Domènech E. Results of the Eighth Scientific Workshop of ECCO: Prevention and Treatment of Postoperative Recurrence in Patients With Crohn's Disease Undergoing an Ileocolonic Resection With Ileocolonic Anastomosis. J Crohns Colitis 2023; 17:1707-1722. [PMID: 37070324 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
Despite the introduction of biological therapies, an ileocolonic resection is often required in patients with Crohn's disease [CD]. Unfortunately, surgery is not curative, as many patients will develop postoperative recurrence [POR], eventually leading to further bowel damage and a decreased quality of life. The 8th Scientific Workshop of ECCO reviewed the available scientific data on both prevention and treatment of POR in patients with CD undergoing an ileocolonic resection, dealing with conventional and biological therapies, as well as non-medical interventions, including endoscopic and surgical approaches in case of POR. Based on the available data, an algorithm for the postoperative management in daily clinical practice was developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Ferrante
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lieven Pouillon
- Imelda GI Clinical Research Center, Imelda General Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - Míriam Mañosa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Matthieu Allez
- Gastroenterology Department, Hôpital Saint-Louis - APHP, Université Paris Cité, INSERM U1160, Paris, France
| | - Christina Kapizioni
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Naila Arebi
- Department of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, London, UK
| | - Michele Carvello
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pär Myrelid
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Annemarie C De Vries
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pauline Rivière
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Centre Médico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| | - Yves Panis
- Paris IBD Center, Groupe Hospitalier Privé Ambroise-Paré Hartmann, Neuily/Seine, France
| | - Eugeni Domènech
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ribaldone DG, Testa G, Verstockt B, Molnar T, Savarino E, Schmidt C, Vieujean S, Teich N, Meianu C, Juillerat P, Grellier N, Lobaton T. Treatment of antibiotic refractory chronic pouchitis with JAK inhibitors and S1P receptor modulators: an ECCO CONFER Multicentre Case Series. J Crohns Colitis 2023:jjad194. [PMID: 37965867 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Data regarding effectiveness and safety of JAK inhibitors and S1P receptor modulators in antibiotic refractory chronic pouchitis (CARP) are lacking. METHODS This ECCO-CONFER project retrospectively collected JAK inhibitors or S1P receptor modulators treatments for CARP with at least 3-months follow up. The outcomes included corticosteroid and antibiotics-free clinical response and remission at three and twelve months, trend in mPDAI, endoscopic PDAI, CRP and calprotectin. RESULTS Seventeen treatments in 15 patients were collected. Previous pouchitis treatments included infliximab (5/15), adalimumab (4/15), vedolizumab (9/15), and ustekinumab (5/15). Pooling data on JAK inhibitors (8 tofacitinib, 1 filgotinib and 6 upadacitinib), after 3 months (T3), steroid and antibiotics-free clinical response was achieved in 53.3% (8/15), steroid and antibiotics-free clinical remission was achieved in 40% (6/15). Of the patients with at least 12 months of follow-up, steroid and antibiotics-free clinical response was achieved in 50% (3/6) and remission in one patient (16.7%), endoscopic response in 50% (3/6), endoscopic remission in 50% (3/6). Of the two ozanimod treatments at T3, steroid and antibiotics-free clinical response was achieved in one patient, without remission; both discontinued ozanimod before T12. No side effects reported. CONCLUSIONS Small molecules may represent a suitable option for CARP refractory to multiple biologics, deserving further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giulia Testa
- Gastroenterology-U, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Bram Verstockt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Edoardo Savarino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery Oncology and Gastroenterology DiSCOG, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Carsten Schmidt
- Medical Clinic II, Hospital Fulda, Fulda, Germany
- Medical Faculty of the Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Sophie Vieujean
- Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, University Hospital CHU of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Niels Teich
- Medical Faculty of the Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
- Gastroenterology Practice, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Corina Meianu
- Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Gastroenterology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Pascal Juillerat
- Clinic for Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology, Bern University Hospital
- Crohn and Colitis Center, Gastro-enterologie Beaulieu SA, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nathan Grellier
- Hepato-Gastroenterology Department, University Hospital of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Triana Lobaton
- Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Nardone OM, Calabrese G, Barberio B, Giglio MC, Castiglione F, Luglio G, Savarino E, Ghosh S, Iacucci M. Rates of Endoscopic Recurrence In Postoperative Crohn's Disease Based on Anastomotic Techniques: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023:izad252. [PMID: 37931290 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izad252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with Crohn's disease (CD) after ileocolic resection may develop an endoscopic postoperative recurrence (ePOR) that reaches 40% to 70% of incidence within 6 months. Recently, there has been growing interest in the potential effect of anastomotic configurations on ePOR. Kono-S anastomosis has been proposed for reducing the risk of clinical and ePOR. Most studies have assessed the association of ileocolonic anastomosis and ePOR individually, while there is currently limited data simultaneously comparing several types of anastomosis. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of different ileocolonic anastomosis on ePOR in CD. METHODS We searched PubMed and Embase from inception to January 2023 for eligible studies reporting the types of anastomoses and, based on these, the rate of endoscopic recurrence at ≥6 months. Studies were grouped by conventional anastomosis, including side-to-side, end-to-end, and end-to-side vs Kono-S, and comparisons were made between these groups. Pooled incidence rates of ePOR were computed using random-effect modelling. RESULTS Seventeen studies, with 2087 patients who underwent ileocolic resection for CD were included. Among these patients, 369 (17,7%) Kono-S anastomoses were performed, while 1690 (81,0%) were conventional ileocolic anastomosis. Endoscopic postoperative recurrence at ≥6 months showed a pooled incidence of 37.2% (95% CI, 27.7-47.2) with significant heterogeneity among the studies (P < .0001). In detail, patients receiving a Kono-S anastomosis had a pooled incidence of ePOR of 24.7% (95% CI, 6.8%-49.4%), while patients receiving a conventional anastomosis had an ePOR of 42.6% (95% CI, 32.2%-53.4%). CONCLUSIONS Kono-S ileocolic anastomosis was more likely to decrease the risk of ePOR at ≥6 months compared with conventional anastomosis. Our findings highlight the need to implement the use of Kono-S anastomosis, particularly for difficult to treat patients. However, results from larger randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Maria Nardone
- Gastroenterology, Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Giulio Calabrese
- Gastroenterology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Brigida Barberio
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery Oncology and Gastroenterology DiSCOG, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Mariano Cesare Giglio
- Gastroenterology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Fabiana Castiglione
- Gastroenterology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Gaetano Luglio
- Department of Public Health, Endoscopic Surgery Unit, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery Oncology and Gastroenterology DiSCOG, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Subrata Ghosh
- APC Microbiome Ireland, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, College Road, National University of Ireland, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland
| | - Marietta Iacucci
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- APC Microbiome Ireland, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, College Road, National University of Ireland, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Visaggi P, Barberio B, Del Corso G, de Bortoli N, Black CJ, Ford AC, Savarino E. Comparison of drugs for active eosinophilic oesophagitis: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Gut 2023; 72:2019-2030. [PMID: 37491157 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-329873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is currently no recommendation regarding preferred drugs for active eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) because their relative efficacy is unclear. We conducted an up-to-date network meta-analysis to compare proton pump inhibitors, off-label and EoE-specific topical steroids, and biologics in EoE. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Embase Classic and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to June 2023. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing efficacy of all drugs versus each other, or placebo, in adults and adolescents with active EoE. Results were reported as pooled relative risks with 95% CIs to summarise effect of each comparison tested, with drugs ranked according to P score RESULTS: Seventeen RCTs were eligible for systematic review. Of these, 15 studies containing 1813 subjects with EoE reported extractable data for the network meta-analysis. For histological remission defined as ≤6 eosinophils/high-power field (HPF), lirentelimab 1 mg/kg monthly ranked first. For histological remission defined as ≤15 eosinophils/HPF, budesonide orally disintegrating tablet (BOT) 1 mg two times per day ranked first. For failure to achieve symptom improvement, BOT 1 mg two times per day and budesonide oral suspension (BOS) 2 mg two times per day were significantly more efficacious than placebo. For failure to achieve endoscopic improvement based on the EoE Endoscopic Reference Score, BOT 1 mg two times per day and BOS 1 mg two times per day or 2 mg two times per day were significantly more efficacious than placebo. CONCLUSIONS Although this network meta-analysis supports the efficacy of most available drugs over placebo for EoE treatment, significant heterogeneity in eligibility criteria and outcome measures among available trials hampers the establishment of a solid therapeutic hierarchy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierfrancesco Visaggi
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Brigida Barberio
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padova, Italy
| | - Giulio Del Corso
- Institute of Information Science and Technologies 'A. Faedo', National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Pisa, Italy
| | - Nicola de Bortoli
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Alexander C Ford
- Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Visaggi P, Savarino E, Del Corso G, Hunter H, Baiano Svizzero F, Till SJ, Dunn J, Wong T, de Bortoli N, Zeki S. Six-Food Elimination Diet Is Less Effective During Pollen Season in Adults With Eosinophilic Esophagitis Sensitized to Pollens. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118:1957-1962. [PMID: 37307575 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The role of inhaled and swallowed aeroallergens in treatment outcomes of adult patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is unclear. We hypothesized that the pollen season contributes to the failure of the 6-food elimination diet (SFED) in EoE. METHODS We compared outcomes of patients with EoE who underwent SFED during vs outside of the pollen season. Consecutive adult patients with EoE who underwent SFED and skin prick test (SPT) for birch and grass pollen were included. Individual pollen sensitization and pollen count data were analyzed to define whether each patient had been assessed during or outside of the pollen season after SFED. All patients had active EoE (≥15 eosinophils/high-power field) before SFED and adhered to the diet under the supervision of a dietitian. RESULTS Fifty-eight patients were included, 62.0% had positive SPT for birch and/or grass, whereas 37.9% had negative SPT. Overall, SFED response was 56.9% (95% confidence interval, 44.1%-68.8%). When stratifying response according to whether the assessment had been performed during or outside of the pollen season, patients sensitized to pollens showed significantly lower response to SFED during compared with outside of the pollen season (21.4% vs 77.3%; P = 0.003). In addition, during the pollen season, patients with pollen sensitization had significantly lower response to SFED compared with those without sensitization (21.4% vs 77.8%; P = 0.01). DISCUSSION Pollens may have a role in sustaining esophageal eosinophilia in sensitized adults with EoE despite avoidance of trigger foods. The SPT for pollens may identify patients less likely to respond to the diet during the pollen season.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierfrancesco Visaggi
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Centre for Oesophageal Diseases, Guy's and St. Thomas Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, UK
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Giulio Del Corso
- Institute of Information Science and Technologies "A. Faedo," National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Pisa, Italy
| | - Hannah Hunter
- Department of Dietetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Federica Baiano Svizzero
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Stephen J Till
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, School of Medicine, Guys Hospital, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Jason Dunn
- Centre for Oesophageal Diseases, Guy's and St. Thomas Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, UK
| | - Terry Wong
- Centre for Oesophageal Diseases, Guy's and St. Thomas Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, UK
| | - Nicola de Bortoli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Sebastian Zeki
- Centre for Oesophageal Diseases, Guy's and St. Thomas Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Angriman I, Degasperi S, Mescoli C, Lacognata C, Armellin C, Caruso A, Scognamiglio F, Fassan M, D'Incà R, Savarino E, Zingone F, Spolverato G, Pucciarelli S, Bardini R, Ruffolo C, Scarpa M. Leaving behind a diseased small bowel during surgery for Crohn's disease: Long-term outcomes. Surg Today 2023:10.1007/s00595-023-02759-w. [PMID: 37882838 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-023-02759-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSES Stricture is a common complication of Crohn's disease (CD) and may be treated with bowel-sparing procedures. Our study analyzed what happens in terms of intestinal and systemic inflammation when the diseased bowel is left behind following surgery. METHODS In this retrospective study, we enrolled 42 consecutive patients who underwent strictureplasty (alone or with resection) for stricturing CD. Control patients who underwent complete diseased bowel resection were identified and propensity score-matched for the sex, age, and history of abdominal surgery. Biohumoral values were collected at follow-up examinations at 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed before and after strictureplasty in 19 patients. RESULTS In the strictureplasty group, fecal calprotectin levels were decreased at 12 months (p = 0.03), whereas in the resectiongroup, they were decreased at 6 months (p = 0.02). On MRI, the ADC [apparent diffusion coefficient] (p < 0.001), wall thickness (p = 0.046) and Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity (MaRIA) (p < 0.001) and Clermont (p < 0.001) scores were improved after strictureplasty. Surgical recurrence was more frequent in the strictureplasty group than in the resection group (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Our retrospective study showed that even if the diseased bowel was left behind after surgery, the intestinal inflammatory activity still decreased. However, the permanence of the diseased bowel still increased the risk of reoperation, probably because of the fibrotic nature of the stenosis and the multifocality of CD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imerio Angriman
- Chirurgia Generale 3 Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Claudia Mescoli
- Pathology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Claudia Armellin
- Chirurgia Generale 3 Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Antonino Caruso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Federico Scognamiglio
- Chirurgia Generale 3 Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Matteo Fassan
- Pathology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Renata D'Incà
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Fabiana Zingone
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Gaya Spolverato
- Chirurgia Generale 3 Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Salvatore Pucciarelli
- Chirurgia Generale 3 Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Romeo Bardini
- Chirurgia Generale Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Cesare Ruffolo
- Chirurgia Generale 3 Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Marco Scarpa
- Chirurgia Generale 3 Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Tursi A, Mocci G, Cingolani L, Savarino E, Pica R, Cocco A, Zippi M, Napolitano D, Schiavoni E, Pugliese D, Scaldaferri F, Costa F, Marzo M, Serio M, Scarcelli A, Bolognini L, Bendia E, Maconi G, Cannatelli R, Piergallini S, Bodini G, Calabrese F, Ferronato A, Pranzo G, Elisei W, Monterubbianesi R, Faggiani R, Rodinò S, Sebkova L, Grossi L, Gaiani F, Dè Angelis G, Lorenzetti R, Allegretta L, Cazzato AI, Scorza S, Della Valle N, Sacco R, Forti G, Colucci R, Tonti P, Neve V, Rocco G, Sacchi C, Zampaletta C, Pagnini C, Graziani MG, Di Paolo MC, Onidi FM, Usai Satta P, Picchio M, Papa A. Use of tofacitinib as first or second-line therapy is associated with better outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis: data from a real-world study. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2023; 24:1649-1656. [PMID: 37358928 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2023.2230126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data regarding the real-world (RW) use of tofacitinib (TOF) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are limited. We aimed to investigate TOF's RW efficacy and safety in Italian UC patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A retrospective assessment of clinical and endoscopic activity was performed according to the Mayo score. The primary endpoints were to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of TOF. RESULTS We enrolled 166 patients with a median follow-up of 24 (IQR 8-36) weeks. Clinical remission was achieved in 61/166 (36.7%) and 75/166 (45.2%) patients at 8-week and 24-week follow-ups, respectively. The optimization was requested in 27 (16.3%) patients. Clinical remission was achieved more frequently when TOF was used as a first/second line rather than a third/fourth line treatment (p = 0.007). Mucosal healing was reported in 46% of patients at the median follow-up time. Colectomy occurred in 8 (4.8%) patients. Adverse events occurred in 12 (5.4%) patients and severe in 3 (1.8%). One case of simple Herpes Zoster and one of renal vein thrombosis were recorded. CONCLUSIONS Our RW data confirm that TOF is effective and safe in UC patients. It performs remarkably better when used as the first/second line of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Tursi
- Territorial Gastroenterology Service, Asl Bat, Andria, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Giammarco Mocci
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova (AOUP), Padua, Italy
| | - Linda Cingolani
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova (AOUP), Padua, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova (AOUP), Padua, Italy
| | - Roberta Pica
- Division of Gastroenterology, IBD Unit, "S. Pertini" Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Cocco
- Division of Gastroenterology, IBD Unit, "S. Pertini" Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Maddalena Zippi
- Division of Gastroenterology, IBD Unit, "S. Pertini" Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Napolitano
- CEMAD (Digestive Disease Center), Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Elisa Schiavoni
- CEMAD (Digestive Disease Center), Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Pugliese
- CEMAD (Digestive Disease Center), Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS Foundation, Rome, Italy
- School of Medicine, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Franco Scaldaferri
- CEMAD (Digestive Disease Center), Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS Foundation, Rome, Italy
- School of Medicine, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Costa
- IBD Unit, Department of General Surgery and Gastroenterology, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Manuela Marzo
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Veris-Delli Ponti" Hospital, Scorrano (LE), Italy
| | - Mariaelena Serio
- Division of Gastroenterology, "San Salvatore" Hospital, Pesaro, Italy
| | | | - Laura Bolognini
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Digestive Endoscopy and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Ancona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Bendia
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Digestive Endoscopy and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Ancona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Maconi
- Division of Gastroenterology, "L. Sacco" University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Rosanna Cannatelli
- Division of Gastroenterology, "L. Sacco" University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Simona Piergallini
- Division of Gastroenterology, IBD Unit, "A. Murri" Hospital, Fermo, Italy
| | - Giorgia Bodini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS "San Martino" Hospital, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesco Calabrese
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS "San Martino" Hospital, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Pranzo
- Ambulatory for IBD Treatment, "Valle D'Itria" Hospital, Martina Franca (TA), Italy
| | - Walter Elisei
- Division of Gastroenterology, "S. Camillo-Forlanini" Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Faggiani
- Division of Gastroenterology, "S. Camillo-Forlanini" Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Rodinò
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Ciaccio-Pugliese" Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Ladislava Sebkova
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Ciaccio-Pugliese" Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Laurino Grossi
- Gastroenterology Unit, "Spirito Santo" Hospital, "G d'Annunzio" University, Pescara, Italy
| | - Federica Gaiani
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Dè Angelis
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Roberto Lorenzetti
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Nuovo Regina Margherita" Territorial Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Leonardo Allegretta
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Santa Caterina Novella" Hospital, Galatina (LE), Italy
| | | | - Stefano Scorza
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Santa Caterina Novella" Hospital, Galatina (LE), Italy
| | | | - Rodolfo Sacco
- Division of Gastroenterology, A.O. "Ospedali Riuniti", Foggia, Italy
| | - Giacomo Forti
- Division of Digestive Endoscopy, "S. Maria Goretti" Hospital, Latina, Italy
| | - Raffaele Colucci
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, "San Matteo Degli Infermi" Hospital, Spoleto (PG), Italy
| | - Paolo Tonti
- Division of Gastroenterology, "A. Perrino" Hospital, Brindisi, Italy
| | - Viviana Neve
- Division of Gastroenterology, "A. Perrino" Hospital, Brindisi, Italy
| | - Giulia Rocco
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Belcolle" Hospital, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Carlotta Sacchi
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Belcolle" Hospital, Viterbo, Italy
| | | | - Cristiano Pagnini
- Division of Gastroenterology, "S. Giovanni - Addolorata" Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Paolo Usai Satta
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Brotzu" Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Marcello Picchio
- Division of General Surgery, "P. Colombo" Hospital, ASL Roma 6, Velletri (Roma), Italy
| | - Alfredo Papa
- CEMAD (Digestive Disease Center), Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS Foundation, Rome, Italy
- School of Medicine, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Di Mario F, Crafa P, Franzoni L, Tursi A, Brandimarte G, Russo M, Rodriguez-Castro KI, Franceschi M, Bortoli ND, Savarino E. A comparison of different symptomatic reflux esophagitis treatments: A real-world study. ADV CLIN EXP MED 2023; 32:1075-1080. [PMID: 37665080 DOI: 10.17219/acem/171001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are currently the reference drugs for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but symptoms often recur after their withdrawal. Moreover, whether prokinetics or barrier drugs used alongside PPIs are more effective remains under debate. OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of different therapeutic approaches to GERD treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS We enrolled 211 grade A reflux esophagitis patients who consented to participate in this non-randomized, open-label trial. The study consisted of 6 sequentially administered medical treatments for GERD, lasting 2 months, with a 3-week washout period between each drug schedule: Group A: PPI (esomeprazole 40 mg/day before breakfast); Group B: mucosal protective drugs (a combination of hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate and poloxamer 407, or a combination of hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate and aluminum, 3 times daily after a meal); Group C: prokinetics (levosulpiride 25 mg or domperidone 10 mg, 3 times daily before a meal); Group D: barrier drug (alginate 3 times daily after a meal); Group E: PPI (esomeprazole 40 mg/day before breakfast) and mucosal protective drugs (a combination of hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate and poloxamer 407, or a combination of hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate and aluminum, before sleep); Group F: PPI (esomeprazole 40 mg/day before breakfast) and prokinetics (levosulpiride 25 mg or domperidone 10 mg before lunch and dinner). Symptoms were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and global symptomatic score (GSS), as follows: heartburn: 0-3; retrosternal chest pain: 0-3; regurgitation: 0-3. RESULTS All but 2 treatments (groups C and D) significantly improved VAS and GSS, with group E showing the most significant GSS improvement. Group C had the highest number of dropouts due to treatment failure and reported more side effects. CONCLUSION Using PPIs and mucosal protective drugs resulted in significant symptom alleviation. However, the administration of prokinetics caused higher dropouts due to treatment failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Antonio Tursi
- Gastroenterology Service, Local Health Authority of Barletta-Andria-Trani Province (ASL BAT), Andria, Italy
| | - Giovanni Brandimarte
- Division of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Cristo Re Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Russo
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Italy
| | | | - Marilisa Franceschi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Local Social Health Unit 7 (ULSS7) Alto Vicentino, Santorso, Italy
| | - Nicola De Bortoli
- Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Pisa, University of Pisa, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Padova Civil Hospital, University of Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Marten Canavesio Y, Pasta A, Calabrese F, Alessandri E, Cutolo M, Paolino S, Pizzorni C, Sulli A, Savarino V, Giannini EG, Zentilin P, Bodini G, Furnari M, Savarino E, Marabotto E. Association between esophageal motor disorders and pulmonary involvement in patients affected by systemic sclerosis: a retrospective study. Rheumatol Int 2023:10.1007/s00296-023-05399-y. [PMID: 37542603 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-023-05399-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune disease of the connective tissue that can affect multiple organs. The esophagus is the most affected gastrointestinal tract, while interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a main feature associated with SSc. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association and prognostic implication between motor esophageal disorders and pulmonary involvement in SSc patients. We retrospectively assessed patients with SSc who underwent both the HRM with the new Chicago Classification 4.0 and pulmonary evaluation comprehensive of function tests and high-resolution computer tomography (HrCT) with the use of Warrick score. A total score ≥ 7 was considered predictive of ILD, while a score ≥ 10 in a HrCT acquired prospectively from baseline evaluation was considered to establish significant interstitial involvement. Forty-two patients were included. We found a score ≥ 7 in 11 patients with aperistalsis, in 6 subjects with IEM and in 6 patients with a normal manometry. Otherwise, a score < 7 was observed in 3 patients with aperistalsis, and in 2 and 14 patients with IEM and with a normal contractility, respectively. Higher scores were observed in subjects with absent contractility or ineffective esophageal motility than subjects with normal motility, indeed DCI and HrCT score were inversely correlated in linear and logarithmic regression analysis. Prospectively, lower baseline LESP and greater HrCT scores at follow-up evaluation were significantly correlated. This study shows an association between motor esophageal disorder and pulmonary involvement in SSc patients: more severe is the esophageal involvement, more critical is the pulmonary disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ylenia Marten Canavesio
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, IRCCS-Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - Andrea Pasta
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, IRCCS-Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Francesco Calabrese
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, IRCCS-Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - Elisa Alessandri
- Research Laboratory and Academic Division of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine DiMI, University of Genoa, IRCCS San Martino Polyclinic, Genoa, Italy
| | - Maurizio Cutolo
- Research Laboratory and Academic Division of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine DiMI, University of Genoa, IRCCS San Martino Polyclinic, Genoa, Italy
| | - Sabrina Paolino
- Research Laboratory and Academic Division of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine DiMI, University of Genoa, IRCCS San Martino Polyclinic, Genoa, Italy
| | - Carmen Pizzorni
- Research Laboratory and Academic Division of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine DiMI, University of Genoa, IRCCS San Martino Polyclinic, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alberto Sulli
- Research Laboratory and Academic Division of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine DiMI, University of Genoa, IRCCS San Martino Polyclinic, Genoa, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, IRCCS-Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - Edoardo Giovanni Giannini
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, IRCCS-Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - Patrizia Zentilin
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, IRCCS-Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giorgia Bodini
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, IRCCS-Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - Manuele Furnari
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, IRCCS-Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Elisa Marabotto
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, IRCCS-Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Barberio B, Marsilio I, Buda A, Bertin L, Semprucci G, Zanini A, Crepaldi M, Zingone F, Savarino E. Efficacy and safety of oral beclomethasone dipropionate and budesonide MMX versus 5-aminosalicylates or placebo in ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2023; 16:17562848231188549. [PMID: 37538919 PMCID: PMC10395162 DOI: 10.1177/17562848231188549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Low bioavailability steroids, including beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and budesonide MMX, have been developed to ensure colonic targeting and low systemic activity than systematic corticosteroids in treating patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Objectives This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of BDP and budesonide MMX® compared with 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASAs) or placebo, in patients with mild-to-moderate UC. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials from inception to December 2021. We included all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing oral BDP or budesonide MMX with 5-ASAs or with placebo in induction of remission of mild-to-moderate UC. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results We identified two RCTs comparing BDP 5 mg with 5-ASA, one RCTs comparing BDP 10 mg with 5-ASA, two RCTs BDP 5 mg versus placebo, one RCT BDP 10 mg versus placebo, two RCTs budesonide MMX 9 mg versus 5-ASA, and six RCTs budesonide MMX 9 mg versus placebo. In terms of achieving clinical remission or improvement, BDP 5 mg, BDP 10 mg, and budesonide MMX 9 mg were more effective than placebo (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.37-4.08; OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.02-4.87; and OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.45-2.85, respectively). The drugs were also more effective than placebo in achieving endoscopic remission. Regarding the comparisons with 5-ASA, we found no differences between 5-ASA and BDP 5 mg or BDP 10 mg or budesonide MMX 9 mg in achieving clinical remission or improvement (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.51-1.57; OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.42-5.64; and OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.82-1.66). However, 5-ASA was more effective than budesonide MMX 9 mg in achieving histological remission (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16-0.70). Overall, all the drugs were safe and well tolerated. Conclusion Low bioavailability steroids were more effective than placebo in achieving clinical remission, clinical and endoscopic remission, and histological remission. No differences were found between 5-ASA and BDP or budesonide MMX. Surely, more RCTs, also comparing BDP and budesonide MMX, are mandatory to confirm or not these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Andrea Buda
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncological Surgery, Santa Maria del Prato Hospital, Feltre, Italy
| | - Luisa Bertin
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Gianluca Semprucci
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Annalisa Zanini
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Martina Crepaldi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Savarino V, Marabotto E, Zentilin P, De Bortoli N, Visaggi P, Furnari M, Bodini G, Giannini E, Savarino E. How safe are heartburn medications and who should use them? Expert Opin Drug Saf 2023; 22:643-652. [PMID: 37477199 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2023.2238592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Heartburn is a frequent symptom occurring in daily clinical practice and is mainly associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, it can be stimulated by various factors and diseases other than GERD can present with heartburn. Therefore, physicians must be very careful in distinguishing GERD from non-GERD conditions in their patients, particularly when heartburn is refractory to anti-reflux medications. AREAS COVERED The aim of this narrative review was to analyze the medical literature regarding the prevalence of heartburn and the various clinical disorders which can be present with this symptom. The type of medications usually adopted for treating heartburn and their grade of safety have been reviewed using an extensive computerized (Medline/PubMed) search with particular focus on the last 20 years. EXPERT OPINION Many drugs can be used for relieving heartburn in patients with GERD, although PPIs are the pharmacological agents with the greatest efficacy. However, it must be highlighted that many non-GERD conditions may present clinically with this symptom whose intensity does not differ between GERD and functional esophageal disorders, which represent about 50% of all patients with suspected GERD. It is very important to identify these functional conditions because their treatment differs completely from that of GERD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Savarino
- Department of Internal Medicine (DIMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Elisa Marabotto
- Department of Internal Medicine (DIMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Patrizia Zentilin
- Department of Internal Medicine (DIMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Nicola De Bortoli
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Pierfrancesco Visaggi
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Manuele Furnari
- Department of Internal Medicine (DIMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giorgia Bodini
- Department of Internal Medicine (DIMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Edoardo Giannini
- Department of Internal Medicine (DIMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ribolsi M, Savarino E. Towards a better diagnosis of gastro esophageal reflux disease. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 17:999-1010. [PMID: 37800858 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2267435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION GERD is a common disorder and is characterized by the presence of typical or atypical symptoms. In GERD patients, the presence of mucosal alterations in endoscopy is detected in up to 30% of individuals. The clinical presentation of GERD patients may be complex and their management is challenging, due to the heterogeneous clinical presentation. The present review has been performed searching all relevant articles in this field, over the past years, using PubMed database. AREAS COVERED The diagnosis and management of GERD have been significantly improved in the last years due to the increasing availability of reflux monitoring techniques and the implementation of new procedures in the therapeutic armamentarium. Beside traditional impedance-pH variables, new metrics have been developed, increasing the diagnostic yield of reflux monitoring and better predicting the treatment response. Traditional pharmacological treatments include acid-suppressive-therapy and/or anti-acid. On the other hand, surgical treatment and, more recently, endoscopic procedures represent a promising field in the therapeutic approach. EXPERT OPINION Diagnosis and treatment of GERD still represent a challenging area. However, we believe that an accurate upfront evaluation is, nowadays, necessary in addressing patients with GERD to a more accurate diagnosis as well as to the best treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mentore Ribolsi
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Campus Bio Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cozzi G, Scagnellato L, Lorenzin M, Savarino E, Zingone F, Ometto F, Favero M, Doria A, Vavricka SR, Ramonda R. Spondyloarthritis with inflammatory bowel disease: the latest on biologic and targeted therapies. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2023:10.1038/s41584-023-00984-8. [PMID: 37386288 DOI: 10.1038/s41584-023-00984-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
Spondyloarthritis (SpA) encompasses a heterogeneous group of chronic inflammatory diseases that can affect both axial and peripheral joints, tendons and entheses. Among the extra-articular manifestations, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with considerable morbidity and effects on quality of life. In everyday clinical practice, treatment of these conditions requires a close collaboration between gastroenterologists and rheumatologists to enable early detection of joint and intestinal manifestations during follow-up and to choose the most effective therapeutic regimen, implementing precision medicine for each patient's subtype of SpA and IBD. The biggest issue in this field is the dearth of drugs that are approved for both diseases, as only TNF inhibitors are currently approved for the treatment of full-spectrum SpA-IBD. Janus tyrosine kinase inhibitors are among the most promising drugs for the treatment of peripheral and axial SpA, as well as for intestinal manifestations. Other therapies such as inhibitors of IL-23 and IL-17, phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, α4β7 integrin blockers and faecal microbiota transplantation seem to only be able to control some disease domains, or require further studies. Given the growing interest in the development of novel drugs to treat both conditions, it is important to understand the current state of the art and the unmet needs in the management of SpA-IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Cozzi
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine-DIMED, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Laura Scagnellato
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine-DIMED, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Mariagrazia Lorenzin
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine-DIMED, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Fabiana Zingone
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Francesca Ometto
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine-DIMED, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Marta Favero
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine-DIMED, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Andrea Doria
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine-DIMED, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Stephan R Vavricka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zürich and Center for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Roberta Ramonda
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine-DIMED, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ribolsi M, Savarino E, Frazzoni M, Cicala M. Prospective validation of reflux monitoring by impedance-pH in predicting PPI response in typical GERD. Dig Liver Dis 2023; 55:721-726. [PMID: 36572569 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Lyon Consensus proposed a hierarchical approach to GERD diagnosis based on conventional and new impedance-pH metrics, namely acid exposure time (AET), number of reflux episodes, post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW) index, and mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI). AIMS To define the value of conventional and new impedance-pH parameters as predictors of response to label-dose PPI in typical GERD. METHODS Consecutive adult patients with typical esophageal symptoms were prospectively studied with impedance-pH monitoring and treated with 8-week label-dose PPI. At the end of the PPI course, symptoms response was assessed. RESULTS Among 255 patients who entered the study, 168 (65.9%) reported symptom remission. At ROC analysis, both MNBI and PSPW index were significantly associated to PPI responsiveness with AUC of 0.783 and 0.801, respectively. Cut-off values of 1747Ω for MNBI and 50% for PSPW index were identified as discriminators between response and non-response to label-dose PPI. At multivariate analysis, MNBI, PSPW index, and AET >6% were efficient predictors of PPI responses (OR 3, 5.4 and 2.3, respectively). Number of reflux episodes did not predict PPI response. CONCLUSIONS The novel MII-pH variables together with pathological are highly predictive of response of the typical GERD syndrome to label-dose PPI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mentore Ribolsi
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200 - 00128, Roma, Italy.
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padova, Italy
| | - Marzio Frazzoni
- Digestive Pathophysiology Unit, Baggiovara Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | - Michele Cicala
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200 - 00128, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ribolsi M, Frazzoni M, Marchetti L, Brigida M, Cicala M, Savarino E. Proximal esophageal impedance baseline increases the yield of impedance-pH monitoring for GERD diagnosis and is associated with heartburn response to PPI. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2023:e14612. [PMID: 37203462 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 04/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Impairment of esophageal mucosal integrity as assessed by low mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) measured in the distal esophagus increases the diagnostic yield of impedance-pH in patients with inconclusive GERD diagnosis as defined by Lyon criteria. AIM To assess the diagnostic yield of MNBI measurement in the proximal esophagus, and its relationship with PPI response. METHODS Expert review of off-therapy impedance-pH tracings from consecutive patients with heartburn, 80 responders and 80 non-responders to label-dose PPI. Data were compared to those from 36 healthy controls using ROC analysis. Multivariate analysis was performed to measure the strength of association of MNBI with PPI response. RESULTS A threshold value of 2665 Ω was defined for proximal MNBI by ROC analysis, affording 91.7% sensitivity and 86.5% specificity. Proximal and distal MNBI were significantly lower in non-responder cases as compared to responders. Adding proximal MNBI positivity to pathologic (>6%) acid exposure time (AET) and positive symptom-reflux association, the proportion of patients with abnormal impedance-pH findings increased from 74/160 (46%) to 106/160 (66.3%) (p = 0.0016). Among the 12 patients with pathologic proximal MNBI as the only positive impedance-pH finding, 9 cases (75%) were PPI responders. According to multivariate analysis, AET and pathological distal and proximal MNBI were significantly associated with PPI response, the strongest association observed for proximal MNBI. CONCLUSIONS Impedance baseline assessment in the proximal esophagus may increase the diagnostic yield of impedance-pH monitoring. Heartburn response to PPI is directly related to ultrastructural mucosal damage in the distal and in the proximal esophagus as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mentore Ribolsi
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Marzio Frazzoni
- Digestive Pathophysiology Unit, Baggiovara Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Marchetti
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Mattia Brigida
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Cicala
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Achalu S, Berry R, Zhuo J, Bredenoord AJ, Clarke JO, Fass R, Gyawali CP, Kahrilas PJ, Katzka DA, Massey BT, Penagini R, Roman S, Savarino E, Vela MF, Kamal AN. Development and modification of a dysphagia question prompt list to improve patient-physician communication: Incorporating both esophageal expert and patient perspectives. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2023:e14600. [PMID: 37122123 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Question prompt lists (QPLs) are structured sets of disease-specific questions, intended to encourage question-asking by patients and enhance patient-physician communication. To date, a dysphagia-specific QPL has not been developed for patients with esophageal dysphagia symptoms. We aim to develop a dysphagia-specific QPL incorporating both esophageal expert and patient perspectives, applying rigorous methodology. METHODS The QPL content was generated applying a two-round modified Delphi (RAND/UCLA) method among 11 experts. In round one, experts provided five answers to the prompts: "What general questions should patients ask when being seen for dysphagia?" and "What questions do I not hear patients asking but, given my experience, I believe they should be asking?" In round two, experts rated proposed questions on a 5-point Likert scale. Responses rated as "essential" or "important", determined by an a priori median threshold of ≥4.0, were accepted for inclusion. Subsequently, 20 patients from Stanford Health Care were enrolled to modify the preliminary QPL, to incorporate their perspectives and opinions. Patients independently rated questions applying the same 5-point Likert scale. At the end, patients were encouraged to propose additional questions to incorporate into the QPL by open-endedly asking "Are there questions we didn't ask, that you think we should?" KEY RESULTS Eleven experts participated in both voting rounds. Of 85 questions generated from round one, 60 (70.6%) were accepted for inclusion, meeting a median value of ≥4.0. Questions were combined to reduce redundancy, narrowing down to 44 questions. Questions were categorized into the following six themes: 1. "What is causing my dysphagia?"; 2. "Associated symptoms"; 3. "Testing for dysphagia"; 4. "Lifestyle modifications"; 5. "Treatment for dysphagia"; and 6. "Prognosis". The largest number of questions covered "What is causing my dysphagia" (27.3%). Twenty patients participated and modified the QPL. Of the 44 questions experts agreed were important, only 30 questions (68.2%) were accepted for inclusion. Six patients proposed 10 additional questions and after incorporating the suggested questions, the final dysphagia-specific QPL created by esophageal experts and modified by patients consisted of 40 questions. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES Incorporating expert and patient perspectives, we developed a dysphagia-specific QPL to enhance patient-physician communication. Our study highlights importance of incorporating patient perspective when developing such a communication tool. Further studies will measure the impact of this communication tool on patient engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sudharshan Achalu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, California, USA
| | - Rani Berry
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, California, USA
| | - Justin Zhuo
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, California, USA
| | - Albert J Bredenoord
- Division of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - John O Clarke
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, California, USA
| | - Ronnie Fass
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, MetroHealth, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Peter J Kahrilas
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - David A Katzka
- Division of Gastroenterology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Benson T Massey
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Roberto Penagini
- Division of Gastroenterology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Sabine Roman
- Division of Digestive Physiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | | | - Marcelo F Vela
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Afrin N Kamal
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mocci G, Tursi A, Maconi G, Cataletti G, Mantia B, Serio M, Scarcelli A, Pagnini C, Graziani MG, Di Paolo MC, Pranzo G, Luppino I, Paese P, Elisei W, Monterubbianesi R, Faggiani R, Ferronato A, Perini B, Savarino E, Onidi FM, Binaghi L, Usai Satta P, Schiavoni E, Napolitano D, Scaldaferri F, Pugliese D, Pica R, Cocco A, Zippi M, Rodino S, Sebkova L, Rocco G, Sacchi C, Zampaletta C, Gaiani F, De Angelis G, Kayali S, Fanigliulo L, Lorenzetti R, Allegretta L, Scorza S, Cuomo A, Donnarumma L, Della Valle N, Sacco R, Forti G, Antonelli E, Bassotti G, Iannelli C, Luzza F, Aragona G, Perazzo P, Lauria A, Piergallini S, Colucci R, Bianco MA, Meucci C, Giorgetti G, Clemente V, Fiorella S, Penna A, De Medici A, Picchio M, Papa A. Real-world efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in managing ulcerative colitis versus Crohn's disease: results from an Italian multicenter study. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2023; 23:293-304. [PMID: 36843568 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2023.2185510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vedolizumab (VDZ) can be used to treat refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). We assessed whether there are differences in treating UC vs CD with VDZ. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Mayo score in UC and the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) in CD scored the clinical activity. Achievement and maintenance of clinical remission during the follow-up, and safety were the primary endpoints. RESULTS 729 patients (475 with UC and 254 with CD), median follow-up of 18 (IQR 6-36) months, were enrolled. Clinical remission at the 6th month of treatment was achieved in 488 (66.9%) patients (74.4% in CD vs 62.9% in UC, p<0.002) while, during the follow-up, no difference was found (81.5% in the UC group and 81.5% pts in the CD group; p=0.537). The clinical remission at the 6th month of treatment (p=0.001) and being naïve to biologics (p<0.0001) were significantly associated with prolonged clinical remission. The clinical response was significantly higher in UC (90.1%) vs CD (84.3%) (p=0.023), and surgery occurred more frequently in CD (1.9% in UC vs 5.1% in CD, p=0.016). CONCLUSION We found differences when using VDZ in UC vs CD in real life. These parameters can help the physician predict this drug's longterm efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giammarco Mocci
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Brotzu" Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Antonio Tursi
- Territorial Gastroenterology Service, ASL BAT, Andria, Italy.,Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Catholic University, School of Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Maconi
- Division of Gastroenterology, "L. Sacco" University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Cataletti
- Division of Gastroenterology, "L. Sacco" University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Beatrice Mantia
- Division of Gastroenterology, "L. Sacco" University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Mariaelena Serio
- Division of Gastroenterology, "San Salvatore" Hospital, Pesaro, Italy
| | | | - Cristiano Pagnini
- Division of Gastroenterology, "S. Giovanni - Addolorata" Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Giuseppe Pranzo
- Ambulatory for IBD Treatment, "Valle D'Itria" Hospital, Martina Franca (TA), Italy
| | - Ileana Luppino
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Annunziata" Hospital, Cosenza, Italy
| | - Pietro Paese
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Annunziata" Hospital, Cosenza, Italy
| | - Walter Elisei
- Division of Gastroenterology, A.O. "S. Camillo-Folanini", Rome, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Faggiani
- Division of Gastroenterology, A.O. "S. Camillo-Folanini", Rome, Italy
| | | | - Barbara Perini
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova (AOUP), Padua, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova (AOUP), Padua, Italy
| | | | - Laura Binaghi
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Brotzu" Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Paolo Usai Satta
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Brotzu" Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Elisa Schiavoni
- Division of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Napolitano
- Division of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Franco Scaldaferri
- Division of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS Foundation, Rome, Italy.,School of Medicine, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Pugliese
- Division of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS Foundation, Rome, Italy.,School of Medicine, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Pica
- Division of Gastroenterology, IBD Unit, "S. Pertini" Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Cocco
- Division of Gastroenterology, IBD Unit, "S. Pertini" Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Maddalena Zippi
- Division of Gastroenterology, IBD Unit, "S. Pertini" Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Rodino
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Ciaccio-Pugliese" Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Ladislava Sebkova
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Ciaccio-Pugliese" Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Giulia Rocco
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Belcolle" Hospital, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Carlotta Sacchi
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Belcolle" Hospital, Viterbo, Italy
| | | | - Federica Gaiani
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Gianluigi De Angelis
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Stefano Kayali
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Libera Fanigliulo
- Division of Gastroenterology, "S.S. Annunziata" Hospital, Taranto, Italy
| | - Roberto Lorenzetti
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Nuovo Regina Margherita" Territorial Hospital, Roma, Italy
| | - Leonardo Allegretta
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Santa Caterina Novella" Hospital, Galatina (LE), Italy
| | - Stefano Scorza
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Santa Caterina Novella" Hospital, Galatina (LE), Italy
| | - Antonio Cuomo
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Umberto I" Hospital, Nocera Inferiore (SA), Italy
| | - Laura Donnarumma
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Umberto I" Hospital, Nocera Inferiore (SA), Italy
| | | | - Rodolfo Sacco
- Division of Gastroenterology, A.O. "Ospedali Riuniti", Foggia, Italy
| | - Giacomo Forti
- Division of Digestive Endoscopy, "S. Maria Goretti" Hospital, Latina, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Antonelli
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology Section, Department of Medicine & Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Gabrio Bassotti
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology Section, Department of Medicine & Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Chiara Iannelli
- Department of Health Science, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Francesco Luzza
- Department of Health Science, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Giovanni Aragona
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Guglielmo da Saliceto" Hospital, Piacenza, Italy
| | - Patrizia Perazzo
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Guglielmo da Saliceto" Hospital, Piacenza, Italy
| | - Angelo Lauria
- Division of Gastroenterology, A.O. "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli", Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Simona Piergallini
- Division of Gastroenterology, IBD Unit, "A. Murri" Hospital, Fermo, Italy
| | - Raffaele Colucci
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, "San Matteo degli Infermi" Hospital, Spoleto (PG), Italy
| | - Maria Antonia Bianco
- Division of Gastroenterology, "T. Maresca" Hospital, Torre del Greco (NA), Italy
| | - Costantino Meucci
- Division of Gastroenterology, "T. Maresca" Hospital, Torre del Greco (NA), Italy
| | - Gianmarco Giorgetti
- Digestive Endoscopy and Nutritional Unit, "S. Eugenio" Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Valeria Clemente
- Digestive Endoscopy and Nutritional Unit, "S. Eugenio" Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Serafina Fiorella
- Division of Gastroenterology, "Padre Pio" Hospital, Vasto (CH), Italy
| | - Antonio Penna
- Territorial Gastroenterology Service, ASL BA, Bari, Italy
| | - Antonio De Medici
- Territorial Gastroenterology Service, PST Catanzaro Lido, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Marcello Picchio
- Division of General Surgery, "P. Colombo" Hospital, Velletri (Roma), Italy
| | - Alfredo Papa
- Division of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS Foundation, Rome, Italy.,School of Medicine, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Emmi A, Sandre M, Russo FP, Tombesi G, Garrì F, Campagnolo M, Carecchio M, Biundo R, Spolverato G, Macchi V, Savarino E, Farinati F, Parchi P, Porzionato A, Bubacco L, De Caro R, Kovacs GG, Antonini A. Duodenal alpha-Synuclein Pathology and Enteric Gliosis in Advanced Parkinson's Disease. Mov Disord 2023. [PMID: 36847308 DOI: 10.1002/mds.29358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of the gut-brain axis has been recently highlighted as a major contributor to Parkinson's disease (PD) physiopathology, with numerous studies investigating bidirectional transmission of pathological protein aggregates, such as α-synuclein (αSyn). However, the extent and the characteristics of pathology in the enteric nervous system have not been fully investigated. OBJECTIVE We characterized αSyn alterations and glial responses in duodenum biopsies of patients with PD by employing topography-specific sampling and conformation-specific αSyn antibodies. METHODS We examined 18 patients with advanced PD who underwent Duodopa percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and jejunal tube procedure, 4 untreated patients with early PD (disease duration <5 years), and 18 age- and -sex-matched healthy control subjects undergoing routine diagnostic endoscopy. A mean of four duodenal wall biopsies were sampled from each patient. Immunohistochemistry was performed for anti-aggregated αSyn (5G4) and glial fibrillary acidic protein antibodies. Morphometrical semiquantitative analysis was performed to characterize αSyn-5G4+ and glial fibrillary acidic protein-positive density and size. RESULTS Immunoreactivity for aggregated α-Syn was identified in all patients with PD (early and advanced) compared with controls. αSyn-5G4+ colocalized with neuronal marker β-III-tubulin. Evaluation of enteric glial cells demonstrated an increased size and density when compared with controls, suggesting reactive gliosis. CONCLUSIONS We found evidence of synuclein pathology and gliosis in the duodenum of patients with PD, including early de novo cases. Future studies are required to evaluate how early in the disease process duodenal pathology occurs and its possible contribution to levodopa effect in chronic patients. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aron Emmi
- Institute of Human Anatomy, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Centre for Rare Neurological Diseases, Padua Neuroscience Center (PNC), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Michele Sandre
- Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Centre for Rare Neurological Diseases, Padua Neuroscience Center (PNC), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Francesco Paolo Russo
- Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Giulia Tombesi
- Department of Biology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Federica Garrì
- Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Centre for Rare Neurological Diseases, Padua Neuroscience Center (PNC), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Marta Campagnolo
- Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Centre for Rare Neurological Diseases, Padua Neuroscience Center (PNC), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Miryam Carecchio
- Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Centre for Rare Neurological Diseases, Padua Neuroscience Center (PNC), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Roberta Biundo
- Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Centre for Rare Neurological Diseases, Padua Neuroscience Center (PNC), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Gaya Spolverato
- Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Veronica Macchi
- Institute of Human Anatomy, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Fabio Farinati
- Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Piero Parchi
- Department of Pathobiology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- IRCCS, Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Porzionato
- Institute of Human Anatomy, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Luigi Bubacco
- Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Department of Biology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Raffaele De Caro
- Institute of Human Anatomy, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Gabor G Kovacs
- Tanz Centre for Research in Neurodegenerative Disease, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology and Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Laboratory Medicine Program & Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angelo Antonini
- Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Centre for Rare Neurological Diseases, Padua Neuroscience Center (PNC), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Center for Neurodegenerative Disease Research (CESNE), Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ribaldone DG, Vieujean S, Julsgaard M, Armandi A, Zingone F, Savarino E, Cañete F, Aratari A, Imperatore N, Ramos L, Plaza R, Pugliese D, Barberio B, Drobne D, Chaparro M. Non-hepatic solid organ transplant in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: an ECCO CONFER Multicentre Case Series. J Crohns Colitis 2023:7055182. [PMID: 36815684 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Solid organ transplantation, with the exception of liver, has rarely been reported in patients affected by inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). METHODS This is an ECCO-CONFER project collecting cases of solid organ transplants (with the exclusion of liver) that were performed in IBD patients. We evaluated the change in the IBD therapy, need for bowel resection due to medically refractory IBD, or need for hospitalization due to IBD relapse ("severe IBD course") before and after transplantation. RESULTS Thirty-four organ transplantations (28 kidney, five heart, one lung) in 33 IBD patients were collected (67% male; 55% Crohn's disease, mean age 53 ± 16 years). The median follow-up was 4.3 years (IQR 3.2 - 10.7). Twenty-nine patients (87.9%) were treated with tacrolimus, 25 (76%) with systemic steroids, 22 (67%) with mycophenolate mofetil, 11 (33%) with everolimus, six with cyclosporine (18%). One patient was treated with infliximab, two patients with adalimumab, two patients with vedolizumab, one patient with ustekinumab. Overall, a severe IBD course was observed in three (9.3%) patients before transplantation and in four (11.7%) in the post-transplant setting (p = 0.26). Three cases of cancer (excluding skin non-melanoma) (9.1%) were recorded in post-transplantation period versus two in the pre-transplant (6.1%, p = 0.04).Six patients (18.2%) died during the period of observation. No deaths were associated with IBD or complications of the transplant. CONCLUSIONS In IBD patients, solid organ transplantation does not seem to impact on the IBD severity. However, the risk of malignancy needs further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sophie Vieujean
- Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, University Hospital CHU of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Mette Julsgaard
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Angelo Armandi
- Department of Medical Sciences, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Fabiana Zingone
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery Oncology and Gastroenterology DiSCOG, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery Oncology and Gastroenterology DiSCOG, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Fiorella Cañete
- IBD Unit. Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, España
| | | | - Nicola Imperatore
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, AORN Antonio Cardarelli of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Laura Ramos
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
| | - Rocio Plaza
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Vallecas, 28031 Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniela Pugliese
- CEMAD, IBD CENTER, Unità Operativa Complessa di Medicina Interna e Gastroenterologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Brigida Barberio
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery Oncology and Gastroenterology DiSCOG, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - David Drobne
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - María Chaparro
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Frazzoni M, Frazzoni L, Ribolsi M, Russo S, Conigliaro R, De Bortoli N, Savarino E. On-therapy impedance-pH monitoring can efficiently characterize PPI-refractory GERD and support treatment escalation. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2023; 35:e14547. [PMID: 36780512 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND On-therapy impedance-pH monitoring is recommended in patients with documented GERD and PPI-refractory heartburn in order to establish whether the unremitting symptom is reflux-related or not. AIMS To define on-PPI cut-offs of impedance-pH metrics allowing proper interpretation of on-therapy impedance-pH monitoring. METHODS Blinded expert review of impedance-pH tracings performed during double-dosage PPI, prospectively collected from 150 GERD patients with PPI-refractory heartburn and 45 GERD patients with PPI-responsive heartburn but persisting extra-esophageal symptoms. Acid exposure time (AET), number of total refluxes (TRs), post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW) index, and mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) were assessed. On-PPI cut-offs were defined and evaluated with ROC analysis and the area under curve (AUC). RESULTS All the four impedance-pH metrics significantly differed between PPI-refractory and PPI-responsive heartburn cases. At ROC analysis, AUC was 0.73 for AET, 0.75 for TRs, 0.81 for PSPW index, and 0.71 for MNBI; best cut-offs were ≥1.7% for AET, ≥45 for TRs, ≤36% for PSPW index, and ≤ 1847 Ω for MNBI; AUC of such cut-offs was 0.66, 0.71, 0.73, and 0.68, respectively. Analysis of PSPW index and MNBI added to assessment of AET and TRs significantly increased the yield of on-therapy impedance-pH monitoring in the PPI-refractory cohort (97% vs. 83%, p < 0.0001). Notably, suboptimal acid suppression as shown by AET ≥1.7% was detected in 43% of 150 PPI-refractory cases. CONCLUSIONS We have defined on-PPI cut-offs of impedance-pH metrics by which comprehensive assessment of impedance-pH tracings, including analysis of PSPW index and MNBI can efficiently characterize PPI-refractory GERD and support treatment escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzio Frazzoni
- Digestive Pathophysiology Unit and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara, Modena, Italy
| | - Leonardo Frazzoni
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico S Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mentore Ribolsi
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, Digestive Disease, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Salvatore Russo
- Digestive Pathophysiology Unit and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara, Modena, Italy
| | - Rita Conigliaro
- Digestive Pathophysiology Unit and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara, Modena, Italy
| | - Nicola De Bortoli
- Department of Translational Research and New Technology in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Visaggi P, Ghisa M, Barberio B, Maniero D, Greco E, Savarino V, Black CJ, Ford AC, de Bortoli N, Savarino E. Treatment Trends for Eosinophilic Esophagitis and the Other Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases: Systematic Review of Clinical Trials. Dig Liver Dis 2023; 55:208-222. [PMID: 35654734 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) are chronic inflammatory disorders of the gut, including eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), gastritis (EoG), duodenitis (EoD), gastroenteritis (EoGE), and colitis (EoC). Available treatments may be ineffective in some patients, and several clinical trials are investigating alternative treatments. AIM We performed a systematic review of clinical trials to illustrate EGIDs treatment research trends. METHODS We searched clinicaltrials.gov to identify studies investigating EGIDs treatment. For each trial we analysed relevant data, including therapeutic intervention, method of administration, study outcomes, and temporal trends. RESULTS For EoE, 66 studies were eligible: 26 testing topical corticosteroids (39.4%), 17 (25.8%) monoclonal antibodies, eight (12.1%) dietary measures, five (7.6%) immunomodulators, one (1.5%) esophageal dilation, and nine (13.6%) other medical treatment strategies. With regard to EoG, EoD, and EoGE, 10 studies were testing monoclonal antibodies (71.5%), one immunomodulators (7.1%), one dietary measures (7.1%), and two other treatments (14.3%). There were no trials for EoC. Ongoing studies on corticosteroids are focused on novel delivery systems, including viscous suspensions, orally disintegrating tablets, or capsules. Increased research on monoclonal antibodies was seen from 2018, with interleukin (IL)-4 receptor-α, IL-5 receptor-α, IL-5, IL-13, IL-15, and Siglec-8 as the targets. CONCLUSION Clinical trials on EGIDs are predominantly investigating corticosteroids or monoclonal antibodies. EGIDs therapeutic landscape will be trasnformed imminently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierfrancesco Visaggi
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Matteo Ghisa
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Brigida Barberio
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Daria Maniero
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Eliana Greco
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Christopher J Black
- Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Alexander C Ford
- Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK; Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Nicola de Bortoli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Visaggi P, Baiano Svizzero F, Savarino E. Food elimination diets in eosinophilic esophagitis: Practical tips in current management and future directions. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 62-63:101825. [PMID: 37094908 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2023.101825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, antigen-mediated disease of the esophagus characterized by symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and an eosinophil-predominant inflammation. Seminal reports identified the role of food allergens in the pathogenesis of the disease by demonstrating that food avoidance could lead to the resolution of esophageal eosinophilia in EoE patients. Although pharmacological treatments for EoE are increasingly being investigated, the exclusion of trigger foods from the diet still represents a valuable option for patients to achieve and maintain disease remission without drugs. Food elimination diets are variegated, and one size does not fit all. Accordingly, before starting any elimination diet, patients' characteristics should be thoroughly evaluated, and a rigorous management plan should be defined. This review provides practical tips and considerations to succeed in the management of EoE patients undergoing food elimination diets, as well as recent advances and future perspectives on food avoidance strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierfrancesco Visaggi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56125, Pisa, Italy.
| | - Federica Baiano Svizzero
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56125, Pisa, Italy.
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ribolsi M, Frazzoni M, Cicala M, Savarino E. Association between post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index and esophageal mucosal integrity in patients with GERD symptoms. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2023; 35:e14344. [PMID: 35238440 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Impedance-pH monitoring allows evaluation of esophageal chemical clearance, a response to reflux elicited by the esophago-salivary reflex, by means of the post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW) index; mucosal integrity can be evaluated by means of mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) and is regarded as a GERD marker. Currently, the relationship between PSPW index and MNBI has not yet been fully investigated and represents the aim of the present study. METHODS Impedance-pH tracings from consecutive patients were reviewed. ROC analysis and multivariate regression models were generated to evaluate the association between acid exposure time (AET), total refluxes (TRs), PSPW index, and MNBI. Patients were classified by means of AET thresholds and symptom-reflux association indexes into conclusive and inconclusive GERD, reflux hypersensitivity (RH), and functional heartburn (FH). Pathologic MNBI <2292 Ω was defined according to published outcome studies. KEY RESULTS Two hundred and thirty patients constituted the study cohort. Overall, a significant direct correlation was observed between PSPW index and MNBI (0.759, p < 0.001). At ROC analysis, a PSPW index cut-off value of 53% was the best discriminator between normal from pathologic MNBI values (sensitivity 88%, specificity 86.4%). Considering AET cut-off of 4% or 6%, a sensitivity of 80.7% and 46% and a specificity of 62.5% and 93.2% were found, respectively. According to multivariate analysis, AET >4% and PSPW index value <53% or <61% were significantly associated with pathologic MNBI values. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES Esophageal chemical clearance is a major defense mechanism against reflux and its impairment represents a major determinant of reflux-associated mucosal damage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mentore Ribolsi
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Roma, Italy
| | - Marzio Frazzoni
- Digestive Pathophysiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara, Modena, Italy
| | - Michele Cicala
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Roma, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Penagini R, de Bortoli N, Savarino E, Arsiè E, Tolone S, Greenan G, Visaggi P, Maniero D, Mauro A, Consonni D, Gyawali CP. Rapid Drink Challenge During High-resolution Manometry for Evaluation of Esophageal Emptying in Treated Achalasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21:55-63. [PMID: 35240328 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.02.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Incomplete esophageal emptying is a key variable predicting symptom relapse after achalasia treatment. Although optimally evaluated using the timed barium esophagogram (TBE), incomplete esophageal emptying can also be identified on rapid drink challenge (RDC) performed during high-resolution manometry. METHODS We evaluated if RDC differentiates complete from incomplete esophageal emptying in treated patients with achalasia, against a TBE gold standard. Unselected treated patients with achalasia with both TBE (200 mL of low-density barium suspension) and RDC (200 mL of water in sitting position) were enrolled in 5 tertiary referral centers. TBE barium column height at 1, 2, and 5 minutes were compared with RDC variables: pressurizations >20 mmHg, maximal RDC pressurization, proportion of RDC time occupied by pressurizations, trans-esophagogastric junction gradient, and integrated relaxation pressure. RESULTS Of 175 patients recruited (mean age, 59 years; 47% female), 138 (79%) were in clinical remission. Complete TBE emptying occurred in 45.1% at 1 minute, 64.0% at 2 minutes, and 73.1% at 5 minutes. RDC integrated relaxation pressure correlated strongly with TBE column height, and a 10-mmHg threshold discriminated complete from incomplete emptying at all 3 TBE time points with area under receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.85, 0.87, and 0.85, respectively. This threshold had high negative predictive values for complete emptying (88% at 2 minutes, 94% at 5 minutes), and modest positive predictive values for incomplete emptying (77% at 2 minutes, 62% at 5 minutes). CONCLUSIONS RDC during high-resolution manometry is an effective surrogate for TBE in assessing esophageal emptying in treated patients with achalasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Penagini
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| | - Nicola de Bortoli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Elena Arsiè
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Salvatore Tolone
- Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Garrett Greenan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Pierfrancesco Visaggi
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Daria Maniero
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Aurelio Mauro
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; San Matteo Hospital Foundation, University of Pavia, Endoscopy Unit, Pavia, Italy
| | - Dario Consonni
- Epidemiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Barberio B, Visaggi P, Savarino E, de Bortoli N, Black CJ, Ford AC. Comparison of acid-lowering drugs for endoscopy negative reflux disease: Systematic review and network Meta-Analysis. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2023; 35:e14469. [PMID: 36153790 PMCID: PMC10078414 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The comparative efficacy and safety of medical therapies for gastro-esophageal reflux symptoms in endoscopy-negative reflux disease is unclear. We conducted a network meta-analysis to evaluate efficacy and safety of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine-2-receptor antagonists, potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs), and alginates in patients with endoscopy-negative reflux disease. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMBASE Classic, and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials from inception to February 1, 2022. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing efficacy of all drugs versus each other, or versus a placebo, in adults with endoscopy-negative reflux disease. Results were reported as pooled relative risks with 95% confidence intervals to summarize effect of each comparison tested, with treatments ranked according to P-score. KEY RESULTS We identified 23 RCTs containing 10,735 subjects with endoscopy-negative reflux disease. Based on failure to achieve complete relief of symptoms between ≥2 and <4 weeks, omeprazole 20 mg o.d. (P-score 0.94) ranked first, with esomeprazole 20 mg o.d. or 40 mg o.d. ranked second and third. In achieving adequate relief, only rabeprazole 10 mg o.d. was significantly more efficacious than placebo. For failure to achieve complete relief at ≥4 weeks, dexlansoprazole 30 mg o.d. (P-score 0.95) ranked first, with 30 ml alginate q.i.d. combined with omeprazole 20 mg o.d., and 30 ml alginate t.i.d. second and third. In terms of failure to achieve adequate relief at ≥4 weeks, dexlansoprazole 60 mg o.d. ranked first (P-score 0.90), with dexlansoprazole 30 mg o.d. and rabeprazole 20 mg o.d. second and third. All drugs were safe and well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES Our results confirm superiority of PPIs compared with most other drugs in treating endoscopy-negative reflux disease. Future RCTs should aim to better classify patients with endoscopy-negative reflux disease, and to establish the role of alginates and PCABs in achieving symptom relief in both the short- and long-term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brigida Barberio
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Pierfrancesco Visaggi
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Nicola de Bortoli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Christopher J Black
- Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.,Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Alexander C Ford
- Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.,Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lenti MV, Scribano ML, Biancone L, Ciccocioppo R, Pugliese D, Pastorelli L, Fiorino G, Savarino E, Caprioli FA, Ardizzone S, Fantini MC, Tontini GE, Orlando A, Sampietro GM, Sturniolo GC, Monteleone G, Vecchi M, Kohn A, Daperno M, D’Incà R, Corazza GR, Di Sabatino A. Personalize, participate, predict, and prevent: 4Ps in inflammatory bowel disease. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1031998. [PMID: 37113615 PMCID: PMC10126747 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1031998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is a complex, immune-mediated, disorder which leads to several gastrointestinal and systemic manifestations determining a poor quality of life, disability, and other negative health outcomes. Our knowledge of this condition has greatly improved over the last few decades, and a comprehensive management should take into account both biological (i.e., disease-related, patient-related) and non-biological (i.e., socioeconomic, cultural, environmental, behavioral) factors which contribute to the disease phenotype. From this point of view, the so called 4P medicine framework, including personalization, prediction, prevention, and participation could be useful for tailoring ad hoc interventions in IBD patients. In this review, we discuss the cutting-edge issues regarding personalization in special settings (i.e., pregnancy, oncology, infectious diseases), patient participation (i.e., how to communicate, disability, tackling stigma and resilience, quality of care), disease prediction (i.e., faecal markers, response to treatments), and prevention (i.e., dysplasia through endoscopy, infections through vaccinations, and post-surgical recurrence). Finally, we provide an outlook discussing the unmet needs for implementing this conceptual framework in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Vincenzo Lenti
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Therapeutics, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine, San Matteo Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Livia Biancone
- Unit of Gastroenterology, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Rachele Ciccocioppo
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, A.O.U.I. Policlinico G.B. Rossi and University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Daniela Pugliese
- CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Pastorelli
- Liver and Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Gionata Fiorino
- IBD Unit, Ospedale San Camillo-Forlanini, Rome, Italy
- Department of Gastroenterology, San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University,, Milan, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Flavio Andrea Caprioli
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Cà Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico and Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Sandro Ardizzone
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Claudio Fantini
- Department of Medical Science and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria (AOU) di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Gian Eugenio Tontini
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milano, Italy
| | - Ambrogio Orlando
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti "Villa Sofia-Cervello" Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | | | - Giacomo Carlo Sturniolo
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Giovanni Monteleone
- Unit of Gastroenterology, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Maurizio Vecchi
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Cà Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico and Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Kohn
- Gastroenterology Operative Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini FR, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Daperno
- Division of Gastroenterology, Ospedale Ordine Mauriziano di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Renata D’Incà
- Department of Gastroenterology, San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University,, Milan, Italy
| | - Gino Roberto Corazza
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Therapeutics, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine, San Matteo Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Antonio Di Sabatino
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Therapeutics, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine, San Matteo Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy
- *Correspondence: Antonio Di Sabatino,
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Visaggi P, Ghisa M, Marabotto E, Venturini A, Stefani Donati D, Bellini M, Savarino V, de Bortoli N, Savarino E. Esophageal dysmotility in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis: pathogenesis, assessment tools, manometric characteristics, and clinical implications. Esophagus 2023; 20:29-38. [PMID: 36220921 PMCID: PMC9813083 DOI: 10.1007/s10388-022-00964-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) represents a growing cause of chronic esophageal morbidity whose incidence and prevalence are increasing rapidly. The disease is characterized by eosinophilic infiltrates of the esophagus and organ dysfunction. Typical symptoms include dysphagia, chest pain, and bolus impaction, which are associated to mechanical obstructions in most patients. However, up to one in three EoE patients has no visible obstruction, suggesting that a motor disorder of the esophagus may underlie symptoms. Although potentially relevant for treatment refractoriness and symptomatic burden, esophageal dysmotility is often neglected when assessing EoE patients. The first systematic review investigating esophageal motility patterns in patients with EoE was published only recently. Accordingly, we reviewed the pathogenesis, assessment tools, manometric characteristics, and clinical implications of dysmotility in patients with EoE to highlight its clinical relevance. In summary, eosinophils can influence the amplitude of esophageal contractions via different mechanisms. The prevalence of dysmotility may increase with disease duration, possibly representing a late feature of EoE. Patients with EoE may display a wide range of motility disorders and possible disease-specific manometric pressurization patterns may be useful for raising a clinical suspicion. Intermittent dysmotility events have been found to correlate with symptoms on prolonged esophageal manometry, although high-resolution manometry studies have reported inconsistent results, possibly due to the suboptimal sensitivity of current manometry protocols. Motor abnormalities may recover following EoE treatment in a subset of patients, but invasive management of the motor disorder is required in some instances. In conclusion, esophageal motor abnormalities may have a role in eliciting symptoms, raising clinical suspicion, and influencing treatment outcome in EoE. The assessment of esophageal motility appears valuable in the EoE setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierfrancesco Visaggi
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Matteo Ghisa
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Elisa Marabotto
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Arianna Venturini
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Delio Stefani Donati
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Massimo Bellini
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Nicola de Bortoli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Rugge M, Bricca L, Guzzinati S, Sacchi D, Pizzi M, Savarino E, Farinati F, Zorzi M, Fassan M, Dei Tos AP, Malfertheiner P, Genta RM, Graham DY. Autoimmune gastritis: long-term natural history in naïve Helicobacter pylori-negative patients. Gut 2023; 72:30-38. [PMID: 35772926 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Autoimmune gastritis (AIG) is an immunomediated disease targeting parietal cells, eventually resulting in oxyntic-restricted atrophy. This long-term follow-up study aimed at elucidating the natural history, histological phenotype(s), and associated cancer risk of patients with AIG consistently tested H. pylori-negative (naïve H. pylori-negative subjects). DESIGN Two-hundred eleven naïve H. pylori-negative patients (tested by serology, histology, molecular biology) with AIG (F:M=3.15:1; p<0.001) were prospectively followed up with paired biopsies (T1 vs T2; mean follow-up years:7.5 (SD:4.4); median:7). Histology distinguished non-atrophic versus atrophic AIG. Atrophy was further subtyped/scored as non-metaplastic versus metaplastic (pseudopyloric (PPM) and intestinal (IM)). Enterochromaffin-like-cell (ECL) status was categorised as diffuse versus adenomatoid hyperplasia/dysplasia, and type 1 neuroendocrine tumours (Type1-NETs). RESULTS Over the long-term histological follow-up, AIG consistently featured oxyntic-predominant-mononuclear inflammation. At T1, PPM-score was greater than IM (200/211 vs 160/211, respectively); IM scores increased from T1 to T2 (160/211 to 179/211), with no changes in the PPM prevalence (T1=200/211; T2=201/211). At both T1/T2, the prevalence of OLGA-III-stage was <5%; no Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment (OLGA)-IV-stage occurred. ECL-cell-status progressed from diffuse to adenomatoid hyperplasia/dysplasia (T1=167/14 vs T2=151/25). Type1-NETs (T1=10; T2=11) always coexisted with extensive oxyntic-atrophy, and ECL adenomatoid-hyperplasia/dysplasia. No excess risk of gastric or other malignancies was found over a cumulative follow-up time of 10 541 person years, except for (marginally significant) thyroid cancer (SIR=3.09; 95% CI 1.001 to 7.20). CONCLUSIONS Oxyntic-restricted inflammation, PPM (more than IM), and ECL-cell hyperplasia/neoplasia are the histological AIG hallmarks. Compared with the general population, corpus-restricted inflammation/atrophy does not increase the GC risk. The excess of GC risk reported in patients with AIG could plausibly result from unrecognised previous/current H. pylori comorbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Rugge
- Department of Medicine - DIMED, Ringgold ID 9308, Padova, Veneto, Italy
- Veneto Tumor Registry, Azienda Zero, Padova, Veneto, Italy
| | - Ludovica Bricca
- Department of Medicine - DIMED, Ringgold ID 9308, Padova, Veneto, Italy
| | | | - Diana Sacchi
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Ringgold ID 9308, Padova, Italy
| | - Marco Pizzi
- Department of Medicine - DIMED, Ringgold ID 9308, Padova, Veneto, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Ringgold ID 9308, Padova, Italy
| | - Fabio Farinati
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Ringgold ID 9308, Padova, Italy
| | - Manuel Zorzi
- Veneto Tumor Registry, Azienda Zero, Padova, Veneto, Italy
| | - Matteo Fassan
- Department of Medicine - DIMED, Ringgold ID 9308, Padova, Veneto, Italy
- Veneto Institute of Oncology - IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | | | | | - Robert M Genta
- Department of Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine Houston, Texas, USA, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Medicine, Michael E. De Bakey VA Medical Center, Baylor College of Medicine Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David Y Graham
- Department of Medicine, Michael E. De Bakey VA Medical Center, Baylor College of Medicine Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Popa SL, Surdea-Blaga T, Dumitrascu DL, Chiarioni G, Savarino E, David L, Ismaiel A, Leucuta DC, Zsigmond I, Sebestyen G, Hangan A, Czako Z. Automatic Diagnosis of High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry Using Artificial Intelligence. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2022; 31:383-389. [PMID: 36535043 DOI: 10.15403/jgld-4525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS High-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) is the gold standard procedure used for the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders (EMD). Artificial intelligence (AI) might provide an efficient solution for the automatic diagnosis of EMD by improving the subjective interpretation of HREM images. The aim of our study was to develop an AI-based system, using neural networks, for the automatic diagnosis of HREM images, based on one wet swallow raw image. METHODS In the first phase of the study, the manometry recordings of our patients were retrospectively analyzed by three experienced gastroenterologists, to verify and confirm the correct diagnosis. In the second phase of the study raw images were used to train an artificial neural network. We selected only those tracings with ten test swallows that were available for analysis, including a total of 1570 images. We had 10 diagnosis categories, as follows: normal, type I achalasia, type II achalasia, type III achalasia, esophago-gastric junction outflow obstruction, jackhammer oesophagus, absent contractility, distal esophageal spasm, ineffective esophageal motility, and fragmented peristalsis, based on Chicago classification v3.0 for EMDs. RESULTS The raw images were cropped, binarized, and automatically divided in 3 parts: training, testing, validation. We used Inception V3 CNN model, pre-trained on ImageNet. We developed a custom classification layer, that allowed the CNN to classify each wet swallow image from the HREM system into one of the diagnosis categories mentioned above. Our algorithm was highly accurate, with an overall precision of more than 93%. CONCLUSION Our neural network approach using HREM images resulted in a high accuracy automatic diagnosis of EMDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Lucian Popa
- 2nd Medical Department, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. .
| | - Teodora Surdea-Blaga
- 2nd Internal Medicine Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, ClujNapoca, Romania. .
| | - Dan Lucian Dumitrascu
- 2nd Medical Department, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
| | - Giuseppe Chiarioni
- Division of Gastroenterology of the University of Verona, AOUI Verona, Verona, Italy.
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy..
| | - Liliana David
- 2nd Medical Department, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
| | - Abdulrahman Ismaiel
- 2nd Medical Department, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
| | - Daniel Corneliu Leucuta
- Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
| | - Imre Zsigmond
- Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania..
| | - Gheorghe Sebestyen
- Department of Computer Science, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania..
| | - Anca Hangan
- Department of Computer Science, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania..
| | - Zoltan Czako
- Department of Computer Science, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Barberio B, Savarino E, Verstockt B, Fumery M, Pugliese D, Bertani L, Buda A, Dragoni G, Goren I, Laish I, Spinelli A, Teich N, Truyens M, Ellul P. Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Syndromes and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: an ECCO CONFER Multicentre Case Series. J Crohns Colitis 2022; 16:1845-1852. [PMID: 35771951 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes [HCCS] are rare polyposis or nonpolyposis syndromes with a higher risk of developing colorectal cancer [CRC]. Coexisting inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], including ulcerative colitis [UC] and Crohn's disease [CD], with HCCS is exceedingly rare and presumably increases the risk of early-onset CRC. METHODS This was a multicentre case series performed as a part of the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation [ECCO] Collaborative Network of Exceptionally Rare case reports [CONFER] project. RESULTS This report includes 26 patients with IBD (10 UC, 15 CD, and one with IBD unclassified [IBD-U]) and concomitant HCCS. Among these 26 patients([median age 33 years, interquartile range [IQR] 20-44], 15 [57.7%] were males, 24 [92.3%] Caucasians, and two [7.7%] of Arab origin. HCCS was diagnosed before the IBD diagnosis in 11 patients [42.3%], after diagnosis of IBD in 11 patients [42.3%], and concurrently in four patients [15.4%]. Sixteen patients had Lynch syndrome, seven had familial adenomatous polyposis [FAP], two had MYH-associated polyposis [MAP], and one had attenuated FAP [AFAP]. The most frequent genetic mutations were those of APC [n = 7] and MLH1 [n = 7]. Overall, CRC developed in 38.5% of patients [n = 10]: in four patients [40%] after IBD diagnosis, in four [40%] patients before IBD diagnosis, and in two patients the two conditions were diagnosed simultaneously. Eighteen [69.2%] patients underwent colectomy or abdominal surgery: nine patients due to CRC diagnosis, five patients preventively due to the underlying HCCS, three due to the underlying HCCS and concomitant active IBD disease, and one patient because of active IBD disease. One patient died due to CRC. CONCLUSIONS To date, this is the largest case series of patients with IBD and HCCS. The most frequent diagnosis of HCCS associated with IBD was Lynch syndrome. These data demonstrate the high malignancy rate and surgical intervention rate in this IBD cohort, despite the endoscopic surveillance. The optimal medical approach still needs to be addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brigida Barberio
- Department of Surgery Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgery Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Bram Verstockt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Chronic Disease and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mathurin Fumery
- Gastroenterology Unit, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France
| | - Daniela Pugliese
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Buda
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncological Surgery, S. Maria del Prato- Hospital Feltre, Feltre, Italy
| | - Gabriele Dragoni
- Department of Gastroenterology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Idan Goren
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Centre, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Ido Laish
- Gastroenterology Unit, Sheba Medical Centre, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Niels Teich
- Internistische Gemeinschaftspraxis für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten IGVS, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Marie Truyens
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pierre Ellul
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Yanai H, Kagramanova A, Knyazev O, Sabino J, Haenen S, Mantzaris GJ, Mountaki K, Armuzzi A, Pugliese D, Furfaro F, Fiorino G, Drobne D, Kurent T, Yassin S, Maharshak N, Castiglione F, de Sire R, Nardone OM, Farkas K, Molnar T, Krznaric Z, Brinar M, Chashkova E, Livne Margolin M, Kopylov U, Bezzio C, Bar-Gil Shitrit A, Lukas M, Chaparro M, Truyens M, Nancey S, Lobaton T, Gisbert JP, Saibeni S, Bacsúr P, Bossuyt P, Schulberg J, Hoentjen F, Viganò C, Palermo A, Torres J, Revés J, Karmiris K, Velegraki M, Savarino E, Markopoulos P, Tsironi E, Ellul P, Calviño Suárez C, Weisshof R, Ben-Hur D, Naftali T, Eriksson C, Koutroubakis IE, Foteinogiannopoulou K, Limdi JK, Liu E, Surís G, Calabrese E, Zorzi F, Filip R, Ribaldone DG, Snir Y, Goren I, Banai-Eran H, Broytman Y, Amir Barak H, Avni-Biron I, Ollech JE, Dotan I, Aharoni Golan M. Endoscopic Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn's Disease After Curative Ileocecal Resection with Early Prophylaxis by Anti-TNF, Vedolizumab or Ustekinumab: A Real-World Multicentre European Study. J Crohns Colitis 2022; 16:1882-1892. [PMID: 35895074 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic-post-operative-recurrence [ePOR] in Crohn's disease [CD] after ileocecal resection [ICR] is a major concern. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of early prophylaxis with biologics and to compare anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF] therapy to vedolizumab [VDZ] and ustekinumab [UST] in a real-world setting. METHODS A retrospective multicentre study of CD-adults after curative ICR on early prophylaxis was undertaken. ePOR was defined as a Rutgeerts score [RS] ≥ i2 or colonic-segmental-SES-CD ≥ 6. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate risk factors, and inverse probability treatment weighting [IPTW] was applied to compare the effectiveness between agents. RESULTS The study included 297 patients (53.9% males, age at diagnosis 24 years [19-32], age at ICR 34 years [26-43], 18.5% smokers, 27.6% biologic-naïve, 65.7% anti-TNF experienced, 28.6% two or more biologics and 17.2% previous surgery). Overall, 224, 39 and 34 patients received anti-TNF, VDZ or UST, respectively. Patients treated with VDZ and UST were more biologic experienced with higher rates of previous surgery. ePOR rates within 1 year were 41.8%. ePOR rates by treatment groups were: anti-TNF 40.2%, VDZ 33% and UST 61.8%. Risk factors for ePOR at 1 year were: past-infliximab (adjusted odds ratio [adj.OR] = 1.73 [95% confidence interval, CI: 1.01-2.97]), past-adalimumab [adj.OR = 2.32 [95% CI: 1.35-4.01] and surgical aspects. After IPTW, the risk of ePOR within 1 year of VDZ vs anti-TNF or UST vs anti-TNF was comparable (OR = 0.55 [95% CI: 0.25-1.19], OR = 1.86 [95% CI: 0.79-4.38]), respectively. CONCLUSION Prevention of ePOR within 1 year after surgery was successful in ~60% of patients. Patients treated with VDZ or UST consisted of a more refractory group. After controlling for confounders, no differences in ePOR risk were seen between anti-TNF prophylaxis and other groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henit Yanai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Anna Kagramanova
- Moscow Clinical Scientific Centre named after. A.S. Loginov, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Oleg Knyazev
- Moscow Clinical Scientific Centre named after. A.S. Loginov, Moscow, Russian Federation.,State Scientific Centre of Coloproctology named after A.N. Ryzhyh, Moscow, Russian Federation.,Research Institute of Health Organization and Medical Management, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - João Sabino
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Shana Haenen
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gerassimos J Mantzaris
- Department of Gastroenterology, GHA 'Evaggelismos-Ophthalmiatreion Athinon-Polykliniki', Athens, Greece
| | - Katerina Mountaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, GHA 'Evaggelismos-Ophthalmiatreion Athinon-Polykliniki', Athens, Greece
| | | | - Daniela Pugliese
- CEMAD, IBD UNIT, Unità Operativa Complessa di Medicina Interna e Gastroenterologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Gionata Fiorino
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - David Drobne
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Tina Kurent
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Sharif Yassin
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.,Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Nitsan Maharshak
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.,Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Fabiana Castiglione
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto de Sire
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Olga Maria Nardone
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Klaudia Farkas
- Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Tamas Molnar
- Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Zeljko Krznaric
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Marko Brinar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Elena Chashkova
- Irkutsk Scientific Center of Surgery and Traumatology, Russia
| | - Moran Livne Margolin
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.,Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Uri Kopylov
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.,Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Cristina Bezzio
- Gastroenterology Unit, Rho Hospital, ASST Rhodense, Rho (MI), Italy
| | - Ariella Bar-Gil Shitrit
- Digestive Diseases Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.,Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Milan Lukas
- Clinical and Research Centre for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, ISCARE Clinical Centre, Prague, Czech Republic.,Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - María Chaparro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS- Princesa), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain
| | - Marie Truyens
- IBD unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Stéphane Nancey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyon-Sud hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon and INSERM U1111, CIRI, Lyon, France
| | - Triana Lobaton
- IBD unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Javier P Gisbert
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS- Princesa), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain
| | - Simone Saibeni
- Gastroenterology Unit, Rho Hospital, ASST Rhodense, Rho (MI), Italy
| | - Péter Bacsúr
- Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Peter Bossuyt
- Imelda GI clinical Research Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Imelda General Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - Julien Schulberg
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands and Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Chiara Viganò
- Division of Gastroenterology and Center for Autoimmune Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.,European Reference Network on Hepatological Diseases (ERN RARE-LIVER), San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Andrea Palermo
- Division of Gastroenterology and Center for Autoimmune Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.,European Reference Network on Hepatological Diseases (ERN RARE-LIVER), San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Joana Torres
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hospital da Luz Lisboa, Portugal.,Division of Gastroenterology, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Loures, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Joana Revés
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Loures, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Konstantinos Karmiris
- Department of Gastroenterology, Venizeleio General Hospital, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Magdalini Velegraki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Venizeleio General Hospital, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgical Oncological & Gastroenterological Sciences (DiSCOG), Gastroenterology Unit, Padua University, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Eftychia Tsironi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Metaxa Memorial General Hospital, Piraeus, Greece
| | - Pierre Ellul
- Division of Gastroenterology Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
| | - Cristina Calviño Suárez
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Roni Weisshof
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.,Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, The Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Dana Ben-Hur
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.,Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, The Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Timna Naftali
- Institute of Gastroenterology, Meir Hospital Sapir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Carl Eriksson
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | | | | | - Jimmy K Limdi
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Eleanor Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Gerard Surís
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital de Bellvitge and IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet, Spain
| | - Emma Calabrese
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy
| | - Francesca Zorzi
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy
| | - Rafał Filip
- Department of Gastroenterology with IBD Unit, Clinical Hospital No. 2, Rzeszów, Poland
| | | | - Yifat Snir
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Idan Goren
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Hagar Banai-Eran
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Yelena Broytman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Hadar Amir Barak
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Irit Avni-Biron
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Jacob E Ollech
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Iris Dotan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Maya Aharoni Golan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.,Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.,Concord Medical Center, Clalit Health Services, Bnei Brak, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Zullo A, Germanà B, Galliani E, Iori A, de Pretis G, Manfredi G, Buscarini E, Ciuffi M, Ignomirelli O, Farinati F, Savarino E, Pallini P, Milan L, Conigliaro R, Grande G, Cannizzaro R, Maiero S, Pisani A, Marangi S, Manta R, Morelli O, Peralta S, La Mantia A, Buonocore MR, Khalaf K, Hassan C, Monica F. Real-time determination of gastric juice pH with EndoFaster® for atrophic gastritis assessment. Dig Liver Dis 2022; 54:1646-1648. [PMID: 35794064 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with atrophic gastritis involving gastric body mucosa the pH value of gastric juice is distinctly increased, so that pH assessment would allow predict this precancerous lesion. We tested whether EndoFaster® - a device allowing real-time pH measure and H. pylori diagnosis - may optimize the need of taking gastric biopsies. METHODS In this prospective, multicentre study, the accuracy of EndoFaster® for ruling out gastric atrophy involving corporal mucosa was assessed. Real-time pH and ammonium determination was performed by aspirating 3-6 ml gastric juice during endoscopy. Histology performed on 5 standard gastric biopsies was used as gold standard. RESULTS A total of 1008 consecutive patients were observed in 12 centres. At histology, gastric body mucosa atrophy/metaplasia was detected in 65 (6.4%) cases, and a pH value >4.5 in the gastric juice was observed in 150 patients. The values of EndoFaster® performance in predicting the presence of atrophic gastritis were as follow: 51% sensitivity, 84% specificity, 18% PPV, 96% NPV, and 82% accuracy. The NPV value was not distinctly affected by neither ongoing proton pump inhibitor therapy nor H. pylori infection. By considering also data of ammonium concentrations, the values of EndoFaster® in detecting extensive atrophy on gastric mucosa were 74% sensitivity, 84% specificity, 24% PPV, 98% NPV, and 83% accuracy. CONCLUSION The very high NPV of EndoFaster® might allow to safely rule out presence of atrophic gastritis, reducing the need of taking gastric biopsies in unselected patients managed in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Zullo
- Gastroenterology Unit, Gastroenterologia ed Endoscopia Digestiva, 'Nuovo Regina Margherita' Hospital, Via Emilio Morosini, 30, Rome 00153 , Italy.
| | - Bastianello Germanà
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, 'San Martino' Hospital, Belluno, Italy
| | - Ermenegildo Galliani
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, 'San Martino' Hospital, Belluno, Italy
| | - Andrea Iori
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Santa Chiara' Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Giovanni de Pretis
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Santa Chiara' Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Guido Manfredi
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, 'Maggiore' Hospital, Crema, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Buscarini
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, 'Maggiore' Hospital, Crema, Italy
| | - Mario Ciuffi
- Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS CROB, Rionero in Vulture, Italy
| | | | - Fabio Farinati
- Gastroenterology Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Pallini
- Gastroenterology Unit, 'San Bortolo' Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Luisa Milan
- Gastroenterology Unit, 'San Bortolo' Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Rita Conigliaro
- Gastroenterology Unit, 'Ospedale Civile Baggiovara', Modena, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Grande
- Gastroenterology Unit, 'Ospedale Civile Baggiovara', Modena, Italy
| | | | - Stefania Maiero
- Experimental Oncological Gastroenterology Unit, CRO, Aviano, Italy
| | - Antonio Pisani
- Gastroenterology Unit, 'Saverio De Bellis' Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Italy
| | - Stefania Marangi
- Gastroenterology Unit, 'Saverio De Bellis' Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Italy
| | - Raffaele Manta
- Gastroenterology Unit, 'Santa Maria della Misericordia' Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Olivia Morelli
- Gastroenterology Unit, 'Santa Maria della Misericordia' Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Sergio Peralta
- Gastroenterology Unit, 'AOU Policlinico', Palermo, Italy
| | | | | | - Kareem Khalaf
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Monica
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, 'Cattinara' Academic Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Beelen EMJ, Nieboer D, Arkenbosch JHC, Regueiro MD, Satsangi J, Ardizzone S, López-Sanromán A, Savarino E, Armuzzi A, Janneke van der Woude C, de Vries AC. Risk Prediction and Comparative Efficacy of Anti-TNF vs Thiopurines, for Preventing Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn's Disease: A Pooled Analysis of 6 Trials. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:2741-2752.e6. [PMID: 34687970 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The superiority of anti-TNF-α agents to thiopurines for the prevention of postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease (CD) after ileocolonic resection remains controversial. In this meta-analysis of individual participant data (IPD), the effect of both strategies was compared and assessed after risk stratification. METHODS After a systematic literature search, IPD were requested from randomized controlled trials investigating thiopurines and/or anti-TNF-α agents after ileocolonic resection. Primary outcome was endoscopic recurrence (ER) (Rutgeerts score ≥i2) and secondary outcomes were clinical recurrence (Harvey-Bradshaw Index/Crohn's Disease Activity Index score) and severe ER (Rutgeerts score ≥i3). A fixed effect network meta-analysis was performed. Subgroup effects were assessed and a prediction model was established using Poisson regression models, including sex, smoking, Montreal classification, CD duration, history of prior resection and previous exposure to anti-TNF-α or thiopurines. RESULTS In the meta-analysis of IPD, 645 participants from 6 studies were included. In the total population, a superior effect was demonstrated for anti-TNF-α compared with thiopurine prophylaxis for ER (relative risk [RR], 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.80), clinical recurrence (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.26-0.96), and severe ER (RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.21-0.79). No differential subgroup effects were found for ER. In Poisson regression analysis, previous exposure to anti-TNF-α and penetrating disease behavior were associated with ER risk. The advantage of anti-TNF-α agents as compared with thiopurines was observed in low- and high-risk groups. CONCLUSIONS Anti-TNF-α is superior to thiopurine prophylaxis for the prevention of endoscopic and clinical postoperative CD recurrence after ileocolonic resection. The advantage of anti-TNF-α agents was confirmed in subgroup analysis and after risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelien M J Beelen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Daan Nieboer
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeanine H C Arkenbosch
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Miguel D Regueiro
- Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jack Satsangi
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford, United Kingdom; Gastrointestinal Unit, Centre for Molecular Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Sandro Ardizzone
- Gastroenterology Unit ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences L. Sacco, Università di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio López-Sanromán
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Gastroenterology Section, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Alessandro Armuzzi
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - C Janneke van der Woude
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annemarie C de Vries
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Zullo A, Germanà B, Galliani E, Iori A, de Pretis G, Manfredi G, Buscarini E, Ciuffi M, Ignomirelli O, Farinati F, Savarino E, Pallini P, Milan L, Conigliaro R, Grande G, Cannizzaro R, Maiero S, Pisani A, Marangi S, Manta R, Morelli O, Peralta S, Mantia AL, Rossano Buonocore M, Monica F. Real-time gastric juice analysis with EndoFaster for H. pylori diagnosis: a large, multicentre study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 34:1121-1124. [PMID: 36170680 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Helicobacter pylori infection is the main cause of the most frequent gastroduodenal diseases. Because its prevalence is decreasing in developed countries, gastric biopsies are negative in several patients. By measuring ammonium in the gastric juice, EndoFaster allows to exclude H. pylori infection during endoscopy. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of device versions working with either 6 ml or 3 ml of gastric juice. STUDY DESIGN This prospective study involved 12 endoscopic units. During endoscopy, EndoFaster testing was performed and standard five gastric biopsies were taken. The accuracy was calculated by considering histological assessment as the gold standard for H. pylori diagnosis. RESULTS Gastric juice analysis was attempted in 1279 patients, but it failed in 131 (15.5%) and in 10 (2.3%), with the 6 ml and the 3 ml device, respectively (P < 0.001). Overall, EndoFaster detected H. pylori infection with an 86.3% sensitivity, 83.3% specificity, 52.7% positive predictive value, 96.6% negative predictive value and 83.8% accuracy. The performance was not affected either by ongoing proton pump inhibitor therapy or a previous H. pylori eradication. No significant difference in accuracy emerged between the two versions of the device. CONCLUSION The novel version of the EndoFaster device operating with 3 ml gastric juice may be performed in virtually all patients, and it allows excluding H. pylori infection with a very high accuracy. Gastric biopsies can be avoided in a definite portion of cases without endoscopic lesions or other clinical indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Zullo
- Gastroenterology Unit, 'Nuovo Regina Margherita' Hospital, Rome
| | - Bastianello Germanà
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, 'San Martino' Hospital, Belluno
| | | | - Andrea Iori
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit,' Santa Chiara' Hospital, Trento
| | - Giovanni de Pretis
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit,' Santa Chiara' Hospital, Trento
| | - Guido Manfredi
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, 'Maggiore' Hospital, Crema
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Paolo Pallini
- Gastroenterology Unit, 'San Bortolo' Hospital, Vicenza
| | - Luisa Milan
- Gastroenterology Unit, 'San Bortolo' Hospital, Vicenza
| | | | | | | | | | - Antonio Pisani
- Gastroenterology Unit, 'Saverio De Bellis' Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte
| | - Stefania Marangi
- Gastroenterology Unit, 'Saverio De Bellis' Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte
| | - Raffaele Manta
- Gastroenterology Unit, 'Santa Maria della Misericordia' Hospital, Perugia
| | - Olivia Morelli
- Gastroenterology Unit, 'Santa Maria della Misericordia' Hospital, Perugia
| | | | | | | | - Fabio Monica
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, 'Cattinara' Academic Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|