1
|
Lee JY, Pihl E, Kim HK, Russell T, Petrie BA, Lee H. Risk Factors for Suboptimal Colon Cancer Diagnosis and Management at a Safety-Net Hospital System. J Surg Res 2024; 301:127-135. [PMID: 38925099 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.05.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colon cancer (CC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Quality measures have been introduced by the American Gastroenterological Association and Commission on Cancer for optimal management of CC. In this study, we sought to identify factors that may hinder the timely diagnosis and treatment of CC at a safety-net hospital system. METHODS Retrospective chart review was performed for patients aged ≥18 y diagnosed with CC from 2018 to 2021. Primary outcomes were time from positive fecal immunochemical test to colonoscopy, time from diagnosis to surgery, and time from diagnosis to adjuvant chemotherapy. Secondary end points were demographic characteristics associated with suboptimal outcomes in any of the above measures. RESULTS One hundred ninety patients were diagnosed with nonmetastatic CC. The majority were Hispanic and non-English-speaking. 74.1% of patients with a positive fecal immunochemical test received a colonoscopy within 180 d. 59.6% of nonemergent cases received surgery within 60 d of diagnosis. 77% of those eligible received adjuvant chemotherapy within 120 d of diagnosis. No clinically significant demographic factor was associated with delay in colonoscopy, surgery, or adjuvant chemotherapy. Most frequent cause of delay in surgery (38.0%) was optimization of comorbidities. Most frequent cause of delay in adjuvant chemotherapy (71.4%) was delay in surgery itself. CONCLUSIONS No clinically significant demographic factor was associated with experiencing delays in diagnostic colonoscopy, surgery, or adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ju Young Lee
- David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Erik Pihl
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | - Hye Kwang Kim
- Midwestern University Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine, Downers Grove, Illinois
| | - Tara Russell
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, California
| | - Beverley A Petrie
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | - Hanjoo Lee
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alagoz O, May FP, Doubeni CA, Fendrick AM, Vahdat V, Estes C, Ellis T, Limburg PJ, Brooks D. Impact of racial disparities in follow-up and quality of colonoscopy on colorectal cancer outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024:djae140. [PMID: 39044335 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefits of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs rely on completing follow-up colonoscopy when a noncolonoscopy test is abnormal and on quality of colonoscopy screening as measured by the endoscopists' adenoma detection rate. Existing data demonstrate substantially lower follow-up colonoscopy rates and adenoma detection rate for Black Americans than White Americans. However, the contributions of racial differences in follow-up colonoscopy and adenoma detection rate on CRC outcomes have not been rigorously evaluated. METHODS We used established and validated CRC-Adenoma Incidence and Mortality (CRC-AIM) model as our analysis platform, with inputs from published literature that report lower follow-up colonoscopy rates and adenoma detection rate in Black adults compared with White adults (15% and 10% lower, respectively). We simulated screening with annual fecal immunochemical test, triennial multitarget stool DNA, and colonoscopy every 10 years between ages 45 and 75 years using real-world utilization of the screening modalities vs no screening. We reported lifetime outcomes per 1000 Black adults. RESULTS Elimination of Black-White disparities in follow-up colonoscopy rates would reduce CRC incidence and mortality by 5.2% and 9.3%, respectively, and improve life-years gained with screening by 3.4%. Elimination of Black-White disparities in endoscopists' adenoma detection rate would reduce CRC incidence and mortality by 9.4% and improve life-years gained by 3.7%. Elimination of both disparities would reduce CRC incidence and mortality by 14.6% and 18.7%, respectively, and improve life-years gained by 7.1%. CONCLUSIONS This modeling study predicts eliminating racial differences in follow-up colonoscopy rates, and quality of screening colonoscopy would substantially reduce Black-White disparities in CRC incidence and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oguzhan Alagoz
- Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Folasade P May
- Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Health and UCLA Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Equity, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Chyke A Doubeni
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - A Mark Fendrick
- Department of Internal Medicine and Department of Health Management and Policy, Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Chris Estes
- Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gautom P, Rosales AG, Petrik AF, Thompson JH, Slaughter MT, Mosso L, Hussain SA, Jimenez R, Coronado GD. Evaluating the Reach of a Patient Navigation Program for Follow-up Colonoscopy in a Large Federally Qualified Health Center. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2024; 17:325-333. [PMID: 38641422 PMCID: PMC11219256 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-23-0498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
Patient navigation (PN) has been shown to improve participation in cancer screening, including colorectal cancer screening, and is now a recommended practice by the Community Preventive Services Task Force. Despite the effectiveness of PN programs, little is known about the number of contacts needed to successfully reach patients or about the demographic and healthcare utilization factors associated with reach. PRECISE was an individual randomized study of PN versus usual care conducted as a partnership between two large health systems in the Pacific Northwest. The navigation program was a six-topic area telephonic program designed to support patients with an abnormal fecal test result to obtain a follow-up colonoscopy. We report the number of contact attempts needed to successfully reach navigated patients. We used logistic regression to report the demographic and healthcare utilization characteristics associated with patients allocated to PN who were successfully reached. We identified 1,200 patients with an abnormal fecal immunochemical test result, of whom 970 were randomized into the study (45.7% were female, 17.5% were Spanish-speaking, and the mean age was 60.8 years). Of the 479 patients allocated to the PN intervention, 382 (79.7%) were reached within 18 call attempts, and nearly all (n = 356; 93.2%) were reached within six contact attempts. Patient characteristics associated with reach were race, county of residence, and body mass index. Our findings can guide future efforts to optimize the reach of PN programs. Prevention Relevance: The findings from this large study can inform clinic-level implementation of future PN programs in Federally Qualified Health Centers to improve the reach of patients needing cancer screenings, optimize staff resources, and ultimately increase cancer screenings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priyanka Gautom
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research 3800 N. Interstate Ave. Portland, OR 97227
- OHSU-PSU School of Public Health 1810 SW 5th Ave Portland, OR 97201
| | - Ana Gabriela Rosales
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research 3800 N. Interstate Ave. Portland, OR 97227
| | - Amanda F. Petrik
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research 3800 N. Interstate Ave. Portland, OR 97227
| | - Jamie H. Thompson
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research 3800 N. Interstate Ave. Portland, OR 97227
| | - Matthew T. Slaughter
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research 3800 N. Interstate Ave. Portland, OR 97227
| | - Leslie Mosso
- Sea Mar Community Health Centers 1040 S. Henderson St. Seattle, WA 98108
| | - Syed Akmal Hussain
- Sea Mar Community Health Centers 1040 S. Henderson St. Seattle, WA 98108
| | - Ricardo Jimenez
- Sea Mar Community Health Centers 1040 S. Henderson St. Seattle, WA 98108
| | - Gloria D. Coronado
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research 3800 N. Interstate Ave. Portland, OR 97227
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dimaano K, Croman M, Montero S, Sandigo-Saballos I, Orellana M, Chervu N, Petrie BA, Lee H. Engaging primary care physicians is critical in the screening and diagnosis of colorectal cancer at safety-net hospital systems. Surg Open Sci 2024; 17:6-10. [PMID: 38235211 PMCID: PMC10792257 DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Primary care physicians (PCP) play a key role in offering colorectal cancer (CRC) screenings, particularly amongst underserved populations. Given potential delays in or omission of CRC screening in the absence of a PCP, we aimed to determine stage of CRC at diagnosis in an underserved population. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted at two Los Angeles County safety-net hospitals. Inclusion criteria were a CRC diagnosis between 2018 and 2021 and age between 50 and 75 years at diagnosis time. The primary outcome was the cancer stage at diagnosis. Results A total of 373 patients were included, of those, 52.5 % had a PCP. Compared to others, PCP was similar in age, racial composition, and primary spoken language (Table 1). Of patients with a PCP, 52.0% were diagnosed by screening. After screening, the most common indication for colonoscopy were blood per rectum (24.9 %) and imaging findings (18.0 %). Patients with a PCP had a significantly lower rate of late stage CRC than those without a PCP (42.4 % vs. 68.0 %, p < 0.001). After adjustment, having a PCP was associated with significantly reduced odds of late stage CRC (Adjusted Odds Ratio 0.83, 95 % Confidence Interval [0.68-1.04]). Having a PCP was not associated with any adjusted increase in number of adenomas or tumor size. Conclusions Patients with a PCP, irrespective of undergoing screening, were diagnosed at earlier CRC stages. This underlines the crucial role of PCPs in CRC and diagnosis, reinforcing the need for their active involvement in these processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrina Dimaano
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Millicent Croman
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Stefania Montero
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Isabela Sandigo-Saballos
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Manuel Orellana
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Nikhil Chervu
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Beverley A. Petrie
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Hanjoo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Thompson JH, Rivelli JS, Escaron AL, Garcia J, Ruiz E, Torres-Ozadali E, Gautom P, Richardson DM, Thibault A, Coronado GD. Developing Patient-Refined Messaging for Follow-Up Colonoscopy After Abnormal Fecal Testing in Hispanic Communities: Key Learnings from Virtual Boot Camp Translation. HISPANIC HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL 2023:15404153231212659. [PMID: 37936370 DOI: 10.1177/15404153231212659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer death in the US. Screening by fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is a strategy to lower CRC rates. Unfortunately, only half of patients with an abnormal FIT result complete the follow-up colonoscopy, an essential component of screening. We used virtual Boot Camp Translation (BCT), to elicit input from partners to develop messaging/materials to motivate patients to complete a follow-up colonoscopy. Participants were Hispanic, ages 50 to 75 years, and Spanish-speaking. All materials were developed in English and Spanish. The first meeting included expert presentations that addressed colorectal health. The two follow-up sessions obtained feedback on messaging/materials developed based on themes from the first meeting. Ten participants attended the first meeting and eight attended the follow-up sessions. The two key barriers to follow-up colonoscopy after abnormal FIT noted by participants were (a) lack of colonoscopy awareness and (b) fear of the colonoscopy procedure. We learned that participants valued simple messaging to increase knowledge and alleviate concerns, patient-friendly outreach materials, and increased access to health information. Using virtual BCT, we included participant feedback to design culturally relevant health messages to promote follow-up colonoscopy after abnormal fecal testing among Hispanic patients served by community clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie H Thompson
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | - Anne L Escaron
- AltaMed Health Services Institute for Health Equity, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Joanna Garcia
- AltaMed Health Services Institute for Health Equity, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Esmeralda Ruiz
- AltaMed Health Services Institute for Health Equity, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Annie Thibault
- Colorectal Cancer Prevention Network, College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Agunwamba AA, Zhu X, Sauver JS, Thompson G, Helmueller L, Finney Rutten LJ. Barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening using the 5As framework: A systematic review of US studies. Prev Med Rep 2023; 35:102353. [PMID: 37576848 PMCID: PMC10415795 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite clear evidence that regular screening reduces colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality and the availability of multiple effective screening options, CRC screening continues to be underutilized in the US. A systematic literature search of four databases - Ovid, Medline, EBSCHOhost, and Web of Science - was conducted to identify US studies published after 2017 that reported on barriers and facilitators to CRC screening adherence. Articles were extracted to categorize relevant CRC screening barriers or facilitators that were assessed against CRC screening outcomes using the 5As dimensions: Access, Affordability, Acceptance, Awareness, Activation. Sixty-one studies were included. Fifty determinants of screening within the 5As framework and two additional dimensions including Sociodemographics and Health Status were identified. The Sociodemographics, Access, and Affordability dimensions had the greatest number of studies included. The most common factor in the Access dimension was contact with healthcare systems, within the Affordability dimension was insurance, within the Awareness dimension was knowledge CRC screening, within the Acceptance dimension was health beliefs, within the Activation dimension was prompts and reminders, within the Sociodemographics dimension was race/ethnicity, and among the Health Status dimension was chronic disease history. Among all studies, contact with healthcare systems, insurance, race/ethnicity, age, and education were the most common factors identified. CRC screening barriers and facilitators were identified across individual, clinical, and sociocontextual levels. Interventions that consider multilevel strategies will most effectively increase CRC screening adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amenah A. Agunwamba
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Xuan Zhu
- Division of Health Care Policy & Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jenny St. Sauver
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Lila J. Finney Rutten
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Allar BG, Mahmood R, Ortega G, Joseph T, Libaridian LN, Messaris E, Sheth K, Rayala HJ. Colorectal cancer screening in a safety-net health system: The intersectional impact of race, ethnicity, language, and mental health. Prev Med 2023; 166:107389. [PMID: 36529404 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Revised: 10/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Though rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening continue to improve with increased advocacy and awareness, there are numerous disparities that continue to be defined within different health systems and populations. We aimed to define associations between patients' socio-demographic characteristics and CRC screening in a well-resourced safety-net health system. A retrospective review was performed from 2018 to 2019 of patients between 50 and 75-years-old who had a primary care visit within the last two years. Numerous patient characteristics were extracted from the medical record, including self-reported race, self-reported ethnicity, insurance, preferred language, severe mental health diagnoses (SMHD), and substance use disorder (SUD). Multivariate logistic regression assessed characteristics associated with CRC screening. Of 22,145 included patients, 16,065 (72.5%) underwent CRC screening. <40% of the population was White or of North American/European ethnicity and 38% had limited English proficiency. Hispanic patients had the highest screening rate while White patients had the lowest among races (78.1% vs 68.5%, respectively). White patients had higher rates of SMHD and SUD (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, most other races (Black, Asian, and Hispanic), ethnicities, and languages had significantly higher odds of screening, ranging from 20% to 55% higher, when White, North American/European, English-speakers are used as reference. In a well-resourced safety-net health system, patients who were non-White, non-North American/European, and non-English-speaking, had higher odds of CRC screening. This data from a unique health system may better guide screening outreach and implementation strategies in historically under-resourced communities, leading to strategies for equitable colorectal cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin G Allar
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America; Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Rumel Mahmood
- Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | - Gezzer Ortega
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Taïsha Joseph
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Lorky N Libaridian
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | - Evangelos Messaris
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Ketan Sheth
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, United States of America
| | - Heidi J Rayala
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Butler EN, Umar A, Heckman-Stoddard BM, Kundrod KA, Signorello LB, Castle PE. Redefining precision cancer prevention to promote health equity. Trends Cancer 2022; 8:295-302. [PMID: 35181273 DOI: 10.1016/j.trecan.2022.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Precision cancer prevention as it is currently envisioned is a targeted, molecular-based approach to intercept carcinogenesis before cancer develops or before it becomes untreatable. Unfortunately, due to systemic biases, current precision cancer prevention interventions might not be effective in all populations, especially in minoritized communities. In addition, not all cancer risk is attributable to genetic or even biological factors, but includes social determinants of health (SDH). Here, we propose a broader framework for precision cancer prevention, anchored in optimizing the benefits to harms for all people. We propose that precision cancer prevention considers not only what is being delivered, but also for whom, where, and how, with a goal of achieving cancer prevention health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eboneé N Butler
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA; Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Asad Umar
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Kathryn A Kundrod
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Lisa B Signorello
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Philip E Castle
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA; Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|