Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Is a Safe and Feasible Option in Management of Esophageal Diverticula: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Feasibility and safety of per-oral endoscopic septotomy for Killian-Jamieson diverticulum: Case series with video

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Killian-Jamieson diverticulum (KJD) is a relatively uncommon variant of pharyngoesophageal diverticula, distinct from the more prevalent Zenker diverticulum. However, literature on endoscopic management of KJD remains limited. This study aimed to elucidate the efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic septotomy (POES) as a treatment approach for symptomatic KJD.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, we investigated the outcomes of nine consecutive patients who underwent POES for KJD between January 2019 and May 2023. Follow-up data of at least 2 months post-treatment were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was the technical success rate of POES. Secondary outcomes encompassed the clinical success rate, defined as symptomatic improvement 2 months after POES, and the incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

All patients presented with dysphagia, with a median symptom duration of 6 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 3-12 months). The median diverticulum size was 32 mm (IQR: 24-42 mm). The median duration of the operation time was 66 min (IQR: 60-109). A 100% technical success rate was achieved, with complete closure of the defect in all cases. There were no adverse events related to this treatment. The median hospitalization duration was 5 days (IQR: 4-6), and the clinical success rate was 88.9%. Follow-up barium esophagograms exhibited significant improvement in the flow of the barium for all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the relatively limited case volume, our findings underscore that POES is a safe and efficacious approach for managing symptomatic KJD.

Precision Endoscopy in Peroral Myotomies for Motility Disorders of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract: Current Insights and Prospective Avenues-A Comprehensive Review

Our review delves into the realm of peroral endoscopic myotomies (POEMs) in the upper gastrointestinal tract (UGT). In recent years, POEMs have brought about a revolution in the treatment of UGT motility disorders. Esophageal POEM, the first to be introduced, has now been validated as the primary treatment for achalasia. Subsequently developed, G-POEM displays promising results in addressing refractory gastroparesis. Over time, multiple endoscopic myotomy techniques have emerged for the treatment of Zenker's diverticulum, including Z-POEM, POES, and hybrid approaches. Despite the well-established efficacy outcomes, new challenges arise in the realm of POEMs in the UGT. For esophageal POEM, the future scenario lies in customizing the myotomy extent to the minimum necessary, while for G-POEM, it involves identifying patients who can optimally benefit from the treatment. For ZD, it is crucial to validate an algorithm that considers various myotomy options according to the diverticulum's size and in relation to individual patients. These challenges align with the concept of precision endoscopy, personalizing the technique for each subject. Within our text, we comprehensively examine each myotomy technique, analyzing indications, outcomes, and adverse events. Additionally, we explore the emerging challenges posed by myotomies within the context of the evolving field of precision endoscopy.

Flexible Endoscopy Versus Rigid Endoscopy or Surgery for the Management of Zenker's Diverticulum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Zenker's diverticulum treatment options range from endoscopic rigid or flexible procedures to surgery. There are limited studies available comparing these techniques. Frequently, the choice of treatment depends on the physician's preference or experience, as well as the institution's resources and capacity. Therefore, this study aims to define the best approach based on the highest efficacy and the lowest severe adverse events. In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive search was performed. Only comparative studies were included, analyzing flexible endoscopy versus rigid endoscopy or surgery. The outcomes analyzed were clinical and technical success, severe adverse events, length of stay, and duration of the procedure. Analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4.1 (RevMan 5.4, The Cochrane Collaboration, The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark). Eight retrospective cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1281 patients were identified, 492 underwent flexible endoscopy, 453 underwent rigid endoscopy, and 336 underwent surgery. There was no difference in clinical success [risk difference (RD), 0.07 (95% CI -0.05 to 0.19%); P = 0.26], technical success [RD, 0.07 (95% CI -0.03 to 0.16); P = 0.18], severe adverse events [RD, -0.03 (95% CI -0.13 to 0.07; P = 0.052), perforation [RD, 0.07 (95% CI -0.04 to 0.19); P = 0.22] or procedure time [mean difference (MD), - 10.03 (95% CI -26.93 to 6.88); P = 0.24). There was lower length of stay with flexible endoscopy compared to the other approaches [MD, -1.98 (95% CI -3.56 to -0.40); P = 0.001]. Based on the current evidence, the three main techniques are effective for the treatment of Zenker's diverticulum. Although there was no significant difference in the safety of each technique in this meta-analysis, this result should be interpreted cautiously due to the limited data and the risk of vies between the techniques, considering that the results tend to favor flexible endoscopy, mainly explained by the newer and safer devices. Length of stay is lower with flexible endoscopy versus the other techniques, which can be beneficial considering the geriatric populations where Zenker's diverticulum mainly occurs.

Multimodal Endoscopic Management of Esophageal Perforations as a Complication of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for a Zenker's Diverticulum

Zenker's diverticulum develops because of a weakness in Killian's triangle, leading to a mucosal and submucosal herniation. Its treatment has evolved from morbid surgical interventions to safer endoscopic techniques such as peroral endoscopic myotomy (Z-POEM). Despite being a safe technique, Z-POEM is not free of complications such as perforations, bleeding, pneumoperitoneum, and pneumothorax, for which new endoscopic techniques have been developed. We present the case of a 53-year-old man taken to a Z-POEM who postoperatively presented dehiscence of the mucosotomy and a mediastinal collection, managed with a vacuum-assisted endoscopic closure device.

POEM from A to Z: current perspectives

The "third space endoscopy" or also called "submucosal endoscopy" is a reality we can transfer to our patients since 2010. Various modifications of the submucosal tunneling technique allow access to the submucosa or deeper layers of the gastrointestinal tract. In addition to peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia, also called esophageal POEM, other variants have emerged that make it possible to treat different esophageal motility disorders, esophageal diverticula, subepithelial tumors of various locations, gastroparesis, reconnection of complete esophageal strictures or even thanks to exceptional endoscopists, pediatric disorders such as Hirschsprung's disease. Although some technical aspects are yet to be standardized, these procedures are becoming widespread worldwide and will likely become the standard treatment of these pathologies soon.

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for the Treatment of Esophageal Diverticula: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence on the efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in patients with esophageal diverticula.

AIMS

This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety profile of POEM in patients with Zenker (ZD) and epiphrenic diverticula.

METHODS

With a literature search through August 2020, we identified 12 studies (300 patients) assessing POEM in patients with esophageal diverticula. The primary outcome was treatment success. Results were expressed as pooled rates and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Pooled rate of technical success was 95.9% (93.4%-98.3%) in ZD patients and 95.1% (88.8%-100%) in patients with epiphrenic diverticula. Pooled rate of treatment success was similar for ZD (90.6%, 87.1%-94.1%) and epiphrenic diverticula (94.2%, 87.3%-100%). Rates of treatment success were maintained at 1 year (90%, 86.4%-97.4%) and 2 years (89.6%, 82.2%-96.9%) in ZD patients. Pooled rate of symptom recurrence was 2.6% (0.9%-4.4%) in ZD patients and 0% in patients with epiphrenic diverticula. Pooled rates of adverse events and severe adverse events were 10.6% (4.6%-16.6%) and 3.5% (0%-7.4%) in ZD and 8.4% (0%-16.8%) and 8.4% (0%-16.8%) in epiphrenic diverticula, respectively.

CONCLUSION

POEM represents an effective and safe therapy for the treatment of esophageal diverticula.

Submucosal tunneling endoscopic septum division for esophageal diverticulum with a median follow-up of 39 months: a multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Submucosal tunneling endoscopic septum division (STESD) is an endoscopic minimally invasive technique for treating esophageal diverticulum. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of STESD and its impact on patients' quality of life.

METHODS

This study included consecutive patients who underwent STESD for esophageal diverticulum from April 2016 to August 2020 in 2 centers (Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University and Tianjin First Central Hospital). Esophagogram and endoscopic examination were performed before STESD and 30 days after STESD. Patients completed the 36-item Short Form survey (SF-36) before STESD and 1 year after surgery. Clinical symptoms were assessed via telehealth every 6 months until August 2021. Costamagna and Eckardt scores were used to evaluate changes in symptoms.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were included. Mucosal injury 1 to 2 cm below the septum occurred in 2 patients. No severe surgical adverse events were observed. Median duration of follow-up was 39 months (range, 12-63). Total SF-36 scores increased from 118.7 ± 18.6 before STESD to 132.4 ± 9.1 at 1 year after the procedure (P = .007). SF-36 subscales of general health (P = .002), vitality (P = .004), social functioning (P = .030), and mental health (P = .020) improved significantly after STESD. The mean Costamagna score decreased from 3.83 ± 1.33 to 1.67 ± 1.51 (P = .010), whereas the mean Eckardt score decreased from 3.50 ± .90 to 1.25 ± 1.76 (P = .002). One patient developed symptom recurrence at 10 months after STESD.

CONCLUSIONS

STESD is a safe and valid endoscopic minimally invasive surgery for esophageal diverticulum, which can reduce symptoms and improve quality of life.

A cooperative approach for treatment of Zenker's diverticulum

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic Zenker's diverticulum management has evolved from an open intervention to an endoscopic management. At our center, both an otolaryngologist and a gastroenterologist are present in the operating room when treating these lesions. An intra-procedural consensus is reached to undergo either rigid endoscopy or flexible endoscopic diverticulotomy with ENT guidance. We evaluated the real-world efficacy with a cooperative gastroenterology-otolaryngology approach.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective study of patients who underwent a cooperative endoscopic diverticulotomy by a gastroenterologist and otolaryngologist at Cleveland Clinic Florida between 2012 and 2019. Demographic and clinical data, intra-procedural findings/complications, post-procedural symptoms, recurrence rate, and reintervention variables were extracted. Patients included in the study were > 17 years old, with symptomatic confirmed typical single Zenker's diverticulum.

RESULTS

63 subjects were identified. Patients were predominantly males (63.5%) and white (84.1%), with mean age 73.5 years (53-95). Most subjects presented dysphagia (98.4%), mostly to solids (79.4%). Other demographic and clinical data are described in Table 1. The diverticula had a mean size of 36.3 mm. In 30.1% of the cases food debris was found during the procedure. The mean procedure length was 38.4 minutes. All cases were performed as outpatient. Technical success was achieved in all cases. Patients were followed for a mean of 3.24 months post-procedure. Clinical success was achieved in 92% subjects. One intra-procedural perforation was treated with endoclip. Table 1 Pre-procedural demographic and clinical variables in patients undergoing Zenker's diverticulum cooperative approach Variable Value (n = 63) Sex, n (%)  Male  Female 40 (63.5) 23 (36.5) Ethnicity/Race, n (%)  Non-Hispanic White  Hispanic  Black 53 (84.1) 7 (11.1) 3 (4.8) Smoking status, n (%)  Never  Former  Active 29 (46.0) 26 (41.3) 8 (10.7) Previous intervention for Zenker's diverticulum, n (%) 12 (19.1) Dysphagia, n (%)  Only to solids  Only to liquids  Both solids and liquids 50 (79.4) 0 (0) 12 (19.0) Regurgitation of food, n (%)  Chronic cough, n (%) 13 (20.6)  Halitosis, n (%) 9 (14.3) CONCLUSION: A cooperative endoscopic approach by gastroenterology and otolaryngology for symptomatic Zenker's diverticulum management offered excellent technical and clinical success. This approach proved to be safe and effective.

POEM, GPOEM, and ZPOEM

Our tripartite narrative review discusses Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM), gastric POEM (GPOEM) and POEM for Zenker's diverticula (ZPOEM). POEM is the prototypical procedure that launched the novel "3rd space endoscopy" field of advanced endoscopy. It revolutionized achalasia therapy by offering a much less invasive version of the prior gold standard, the laparoscopic Heller myotomy (HM). We review in detail indications, outcomes, technique variations and comparative data between POEM and HM particularly with regard to the hotly debated issue of GERD. We then proceed to discuss two less illustrious but nevertheless important offshoots of the iconic POEM procedure: GPOEM for gastroparesis and ZPOEM for the treatment of hypopharyngeal diverticula. For GPOEM, we discuss the rationale of pylorus-directed therapies, briefly touch on GPOEM technique variations and then focus on the importance of proper patient selection and emerging data in this area. On the third and final part of our review, we discuss ZPOEM and expound on technique variations including our "ultra-short tunnel technique". Our review emphasizes that, despite the superiority of endoscopy over surgery for the treatment of hypopharyngeal diverticula, there is no clear evidence yet of the superiority of the newfangled ZPOEM technique compared to the conventional endoscopic myotomy technique practiced for over two decades prior to the advent of ZPOEM.

Per-oral endoscopic myotomy as treatment for Killian-Jamieson diverticulum

Killian-Jamieson diverticulum (KJD) is a rare type of esophageal diverticulum less commonly encountered compared with Zenker's diverticulum (ZD). Endoscopic approach for these diverticula has been rapidly evolving. Currently, a flexible endoscopic septum division is considered the first-line treatment for symptomatic ZD patients, however reported recurrence rates are over 10% according to recent literature. With the advent of submucosal tunneling technique established by per-oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia, it has been applied to treat ZD named as Zenker's diverticulum per-oral endoscopic myotomy (Z-POEM) as a minimally invasive treatment. Although there are very few reports utilizing submucosal tunneling approach to KJD, we have opted to perform Z-POEM in order to safely perform complete dissection of the muscle septum while maintaining mucosal integration. Due to the difficulty of anatomical location of KJD, we created mucosal incision and subsequent submucosal tunnel directly at the level of the septum as opposed to creating a submucosal tunnel few centimeters proximal to the septum as being previously proposed. We report a case in which this technique was successfully performed with complete resolution of dysphagia without any adverse event. This technique permits to perform complete myotomies without the fear of causing perforation. Although larger cohorts are required to assess its safety and efficacy, Z-POEM to treat KJD seems to be promising.

The role of peroral endoscopic myotomy for Zenker's diverticulum: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Zenker's peroral endoscopic myotomy (Z-POEM) has revolutionized the therapeutic strategy for Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) with promising results. We conducted this meta-analysis to estimate the safety and efficacy of Z-POEM for ZD and compare the feasibility and effectiveness of Z-POEM with that of flexible endoscopic septotomy (FES).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases to query for studies that assessed the safety and efficacy of Z-POEM for ZD. All articles published from inception to July 31, 2021 were included. The primary outcomes were the overall technical success rate, clinical success rate, incidence of adverse events, and clinical recurrence rate.

RESULTS

Eleven studies involving 357 patients undergone Z-POEM were included. Overall, the quality of included studies was above average, with five studies rated as high quality and six ranked as moderate quality. The overall pooled technical success rate for Z-POEM was 96.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 93.6-97.9%; I² = 0%). The total pooled clinical success rate for Z-POEM was 93.0% (95% CI 89.4-95.4%; I² = 0%). The pooled incidence of adverse events for Z-POEM was 12.4% (95% CI 9.1-16.7%; I² = 0%). The pooled clinical recurrence rate for Z-POEM was 11.2% (95% CI 7.6-16.2%; I² = 0%). The clinical success for Z-POEM was significantly better than that of FES (relative risk [RR]: 1.11; CI 95% 1.03-1.18; p = 0.004, I² = 0%), while there were no significant differences in technical success, adverse events, and clinical recurrence between Z-POEM and FES.

CONCLUSION

Z-POEM could be an effective and safe therapeutic modality for ZD, and even has a slightly higher clinical success rate than FES. However, comparative studies with long-term follow-up will be needed to further confirm our finding.

Submucosal tunnelling techniques for Zenker's diverticulum: a systematic review of early outcomes with pooled analysis

In the last decade, flexible endoscopic septotomy has been reported as a well-tolerated and effective treatment for Zenker's diverticulum. More recently, novel endoscopic submucosal tunneling techniques, namely Zenker-PerOral Endoscopic Myotomy (Z-POEM) and PerOral Endoscopic Septotomy (POES) have been proposed to obtain complete muscular septum exposure and deeper myotomy. The aim of this study is to provide a systematic review with a meta-analysis of the first experiences of third space approaches for Zenker's diverticulum. Electronic databases (Medline, Scopus, EMBASE) were searched up to October 2020. Studies including patients with symptomatic Zenker's diverticulum who underwent endoscopic treatment by submucosal tunneling technique were eligible. Procedural, clinical and safety outcomes were assessed by pooling data with a random-effect model to obtain a proportion with a 95% confidence interval. Nine retrospective studies were eligible for inclusion (196 patients). Five studies were performed in the USA, two in Europe and two in Asia. Endoscopic treatment was feasible in 96.9% (I2 = 0%) of patients. The mean procedure duration was 36.4 ± 14.3 minutes. Clinical success was achieved after 93.4% (I2 = 0%) of procedures. The overall adverse events rate was 4.9% (I2 = 0%). No differences between the two approaches (Z-POEM vs POES) have been shown in terms of both efficacy and safety. Submucosal tunneling techniques appear to be feasible for symptomatic Zenker's diverticulum, with promising results in terms of efficacy and safety outcomes.

Diverticular per oral endoscopic myotomy (DPOEM) for esophageal diverticular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The traditional way to tackle Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) has been flexible endoscopic septum division (FESD). Recently, the concept of per oral endoscopic myotomy has been found useful for managing diverticular diseases of the esophagus and has been termed DPOEM. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of D-POEM in diverticular disease of the esophagus and to compare it with FESD. We systematically searched PubMed and Embase, for studies reporting clinical success, technical success and adverse events in D-POEM alone or D-POEM comparing with FESD. We computed pooled prevalence for D-POEM alone and risk ratio for D-POEM vs FESD using random effect method with inverse variance approach. Subgroup analysis for ZD, non-ZD and mixed diverticulum was conducted. Totally 19 studies including 341 patients were identified reporting on D-POEM. The pooled clinical, technical success and adverse event rates for D-POEM were 87.07%, 95.19% and 10.22%, respectively. The clinical success was significantly better than FESD while the technical success, adverse event rate, procedure time and length of hospital stay were comparable with FESD. The recurrence rate was negligible for D-POEM compared to FESD. On subgroup analysis by dividing into three groups of ZD, non-ZD and mixed, there was no difference between clinical, technical success and adverse event rate among the three groups. D-POEM is an effective and safe technique among both ZD and non-ZD patients and has better clinical success than FESD.