1
|
Koller BH, Jania LA, Li H, Barker WT, Melander RJ, Melander C. Adjuvants restore colistin sensitivity in mouse models of highly colistin-resistant isolates, limiting bacterial proliferation and dissemination. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2024; 68:e0067124. [PMID: 39194205 PMCID: PMC11459950 DOI: 10.1128/aac.00671-24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 08/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has led to a marked reduction in the effectiveness of many antibiotics, representing a substantial and escalating concern for global health. Particularly alarming is resistance in Gram-negative bacteria due to the scarcity of therapeutic options for treating infections caused by these pathogens. This challenge is further compounded by the rising incidence of resistance to colistin, an antibiotic traditionally considered a last resort for the treatment of multi-drug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections. In this study, we demonstrate that adjuvants restore colistin sensitivity in vivo. We previously reported that the salicylanilide kinase inhibitor IMD-0354, which was originally developed to inhibit the human kinase IKKβ in the NFκB pathway, is a potent colistin adjuvant. Subsequent analog synthesis using an amide isostere approach led to the creation of a series of novel benzimidazole compounds with enhanced colistin adjuvant activity. Herein, we demonstrate that both IMD-0354 and a lead benzimidazole effectively restore colistin susceptibility in mouse models of highly colistin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii-induced peritonitis. These novel adjuvants show low toxicity in vivo, significantly reduce bacterial load, and prevent dissemination that could otherwise result in systemic infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beverly H. Koller
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Leigh A. Jania
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Haoting Li
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA
| | - William T. Barker
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA
| | - Roberta J. Melander
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA
| | - Christian Melander
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Würstle S, Schneider T, Karapetyan S, Hapfelmeier A, Isaakidou A, Studen F, Schmid RM, von Delius S, Rothe K, Burgkart R, Obermeier A, Triebelhorn J, Erber J, Voit F, Geisler F, Spinner CD, Schneider J, Wagner L. LINAS-Score: prognostic model for mortality assessment in patients with cirrhotic liver and infected ascites. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 39:1876-1884. [PMID: 38837839 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Patients with liver cirrhosis often face a grave threat from infected ascites (IA). However, a well-established prognostic model for this complication has not been established in routine clinical practice. Therefore, we aimed to assess mortality risk in patients with liver cirrhosis and IA. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study across three tertiary hospitals, enrolling 534 adult patients with cirrhotic liver and IA, comprising 465 with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), 34 with bacterascites (BA), and 35 with secondary peritonitis (SP). To determine the attributable mortality risk linked to IA, these patients were matched with 122 patients with hydropic decompensated liver cirrhosis but without IA. Clinical, laboratory, and microbiological parameters were assessed for their relation to mortality using univariable analyses and a multivariable random forest model (RFM). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression model was used to establish an easy-to-use mortality prediction score. RESULTS The in-hospital mortality risk was highest for SP (39.0%), followed by SBP (26.0%) and BA (25.0%). Besides illness severity markers, microbiological parameters, such as Candida spp., were identified as the most significant indicators for mortality. The Lasso model determined 15 parameters with corresponding scores, yielding good discriminatory power (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve = 0.89). Counting from 0 to 83, scores of 20, 40, 60, and 80 corresponded to in-hospital mortalities of 3.3%, 30.8%, 85.2%, and 98.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION We developed a promising mortality prediction score for IA, highlighting the importance of microbiological parameters in conjunction with illness severity for assessing patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Würstle
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Clinical Medicine - Clinical Department for Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Tillman Schneider
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Clinical Medicine - Clinical Department for Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Siranush Karapetyan
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of AI and Informatics in Medicine, University Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Hapfelmeier
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of AI and Informatics in Medicine, University Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andriana Isaakidou
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Clinical Medicine - Clinical Department for Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Fabian Studen
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Clinical Medicine - Clinical Department for Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Roland M Schmid
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Clinical Medicine - Clinical Department for Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephan von Delius
- Department of Internal Medicine II, RoMed Hospital Rosenheim, Rosenheim, Germany
| | - Kathrin Rothe
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, University Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Rainer Burgkart
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Orthopaedics, University Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Obermeier
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Orthopaedics, University Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Julian Triebelhorn
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Clinical Medicine - Clinical Department for Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Johanna Erber
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Clinical Medicine - Clinical Department for Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Voit
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Clinical Medicine - Clinical Department for Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Fabian Geisler
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Clinical Medicine - Clinical Department for Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph D Spinner
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Clinical Medicine - Clinical Department for Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jochen Schneider
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Clinical Medicine - Clinical Department for Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Laura Wagner
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Clinical Medicine - Clinical Department for Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Choudhury A, Adali G, Kaewdech A, Giri S, Kumar R. Liver Transplantation in Chronic Liver Disease and Acute on Chronic Liver Failure- Indication, Timing and Practices. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2024; 14:101347. [PMID: 38371606 PMCID: PMC10869905 DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2024.101347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) is the second most common solid organ transplantation worldwide. LT is considered the best and most definitive therapeutic option for patients with decompensated chronic liver disease (CLD), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), acute liver failure (ALF), and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). The etiology of CLD shows wide geographical variation, with viral hepatitis being the major etiology in the east and alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) in the west. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is on an increasing trend and is expected to be the most common etiology on a global scale. Since the first successful LT, there have been radical changes in the indications for LT. In many circumstances, not just the liver disease itself but factors such as extra-hepatic organ dysfunction or failures necessitate LT. ACLF is a dynamic syndrome that has extremely high short-term mortality. Currently, there is no single approved therapy for ACLF, and LT seems to be the only feasible therapeutic option for selected patients at high risk of mortality. Early identification of ACLF, stratification of patients according to disease severity, aggressive organ support, and etiology-specific treatment approaches have a significant impact on post-transplant outcomes. This review briefly describes the indications, timing, and referral practices for LT in patients with CLD and ACLF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashok Choudhury
- Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplant, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Gupse Adali
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Health Sciences, Ümraniye, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Apichat Kaewdech
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Suprabhat Giri
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneshwar, India
| | - Rahul Kumar
- Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fiore M, Leone S. Antibiotic treatment in cirrhotic patients. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11:8242-8246. [PMID: 38130612 PMCID: PMC10731195 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i35.8242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/14/2023] Open
Abstract
In this editorial, we comment on the article by Liakina V: "Antibiotic resistance in patients with liver cirrhosis: Prevalence and current approach to tackle" (World J Clin Cases 2023, 11: 7530-7542). In this excellent review, Liakina presents current data on bacterial complications in patients with cirrhosis. Bacterial infections are the most common complication in patients with liver cirrhosis. We focus specifically on spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) which is the most representative infectious complication. Liakina V suggested starting empirically, in all patients with suspected SBP, third-generation cephalosporins when the number of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) in ascites is greater than 250/mm3. This statement creates some doubts in our clinical practice so we discuss on the unsolved pitfalls of diagnosis and treatment that are often encountered in patients with ascitic fluid infections, especially on bacterascites that is defined as ascitic bacterial growth with PMNs below 250/mm3. The severity of liver disease and overall prognosis are highly comparable for patients with bacterascites and SBP in some recent well-conducted studies. Furthermore, we present a brief analysis of the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant isolates with an introduction of currently approved antibiotic drug options to treat ascitic fluid infections avoiding antibiotic resistance. In light of the most recent epidemiological data, third-generation cephalosporins should not be considered as an empirical antibiotic treatment of choice for ascitic fluid infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Fiore
- Department of Women, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples 80138, Italy
| | - Sebastiano Leone
- Division of Infectious Diseases, San Giuseppe Moscati” Hospital, Avellino 83100, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Long B, Gottlieb M. Emergency medicine updates: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Am J Emerg Med 2023; 70:84-89. [PMID: 37244043 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a common infection in patients with cirrhosis and ascites and is associated with significant risk of mortality. Therefore, it is important for emergency medicine clinicians to be aware of the current evidence regarding the diagnosis and management of this condition. OBJECTIVE This paper evaluates key evidence-based updates concerning SBP for the emergency clinician. DISCUSSION SBP is commonly due to Gram-negative bacteria, but infections due to Gram-positive bacteria and multidrug resistant bacteria are increasing. The typical presentation of SBP includes abdominal pain, worsening ascites, fever, or altered mental status in a patient with known liver disease; however, some patients may be asymptomatic or present with only mild symptoms. Paracentesis is the diagnostic modality of choice and should be performed in any patient with ascites and concern for SBP or upper gastrointestinal bleeding, or in those being admitted for a complication of cirrhosis. Ultrasound should be used to optimize the procedure. An ascites absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 250 cells/mm3 is diagnostic of SBP. Ascitic fluid should be placed in blood culture bottles to improve the culture yield. Leukocyte esterase reagent strips can be used for rapid diagnosis if available. While many patients will demonstrate coagulation panel abnormalities, routine transfusion is not recommended. Management traditionally includes a third-generation cephalosporin, but specific patient populations may require more broad-spectrum coverage with a carbapenem or piperacillin-tazobactam. Albumin infusion is associated with reduced risk of renal impairment and mortality. CONCLUSIONS An understanding of literature updates can improve the care of patients with suspected SBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brit Long
- SAUSHEC, Emergency Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, United States of America.
| | - Michael Gottlieb
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|