Poor Performance of Non-invasive Tests for Advanced Fibrosis in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Multicentric Asian Study

Clinical characteristics of lean and non-lean non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) affects more than a quarter of the global population and has become the world's number one chronic liver disease, seriously jeopardizing public life and health. Despite the new terminology of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has been proposed, the mechanisms underlying the heterogeneity across BMI stratification in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) remain unclear. The aim of this study was to reveal the differences in metabolic and fibrotic characteristics between lean (BMI < 23 kg/m2) and non-lean NAFLD in an Asian population.

METHODS

The current study collected NAFLD patients from the physical examination population. Patients were divided into two groups by BMI to compare their clinical parameters, including lean (BMI < 23 kg/m2) and non-lean (BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2) and fibrosis subgroups (with a threshold of LSM = 8 kPa) and analyzed for risk factors by logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Of the 11,577 NAFLD patients who participated in the study, there were 916 lean and 10,661 non-lean. The non-lean group was younger than the lean group (median age 50 vs. 52 years, P < 0.001) and had a significantly higher prevalence of hypertension (28.0% vs. 18.3%), diabetes mellitus (10.1% vs. 6.1%), and liver fibrosis (9.1% vs. 5.1%) (all P < 0.001). Analysis of metabolic indexes showed that TyG, TyG-BMI, TG/HDL-C and APRI were higher in the non-lean group (all P < 0.001). Gender stratification revealed that ALT was significantly higher in the male non-lean group, while HDL-C was lower in the female non-lean group (1.35 vs. 1.47 mmol/L). Multiple regression suggested that the risk of fibrosis was independently associated with CAP values and fasting glucose, BMI, direct bilirubin, globulin, and age in the non-lean group, whereas the risk was mainly driven by GGT and ALP in the lean group.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-lean NAFLD patients showed more significant metabolic disturbances and risk of liver fibrosis. Although metabolic indicators (TyG, FIB-4) have limited predictive value for liver fibrosis, they are strongly associated with metabolic risk in MASLD.

Addressing the essentials of the recent guidelines for managing patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is the leading cause of end-stage liver disease and liver transplantation in the Western world, with an approximate prevalence of 30% worldwide which is continuously rising. It is characterized by intrahepatic fat deposition along with at least one cardiometabolic risk factor, such as diabetes mellitus, obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, and hypertension. MASLD consists of a spectrum of liver diseases ranging from simple liver steatosis to steatohepatitis, liver fibrosis, and cirrhosis. Recently, the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), and the European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO) released the latest guidelines regarding the management of patients with MASLD. This article highlights the critical points of these guidelines and emphasizes problematic issues that need further evaluation.

Disparities in screening and risk stratification for hispanic adults with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

BACKGROUND AIMS

Cut-points for non-invasive tests (NITs) for risk stratification in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) were derived from predominantly non-Hispanic populations. It is unknown if these cut-points perform adequately in Hispanic individuals. We assessed the performance characteristics of current NIT cut-points among Hispanic patients and determined whether they could be further optimized.

APPROACH RESULTS

We prospectively enrolled 244 adults with biopsy-proven MASLD. Participants underwent a research visit with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and vibration controlled transient elastography (VCTE). Histology and imaging assessments were conducted centrally. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by area under the receiver-operating curve (AUROC) and optimal cut-points were identified by Youden J analysis. The mean (±SD) age and body mass index were 52.6 (±13) and 31.6 (±4.6) kg/m2. Overall, 40% had diabetes, 31% (N=75) were Hispanic. 40% of Hispanic and 28.4% of non-Hispanic patients had significant fibrosis. To detect significant fibrosis, MRE and VCTE exhibited significantly lower accuracy in Hispanic versus non-Hispanic participants (AUROC: MRE, 0.87 vs. 0.98, p=0.01; VCTE, 0.78 vs. 0.92, p=0.02). Clinical care algorithms yielded high false-negative rates among Hispanic participants (14% with low-risk FIB-4 and 21% with low-risk VCTE had advanced fibrosis on biopsy). Cut-points of 2.73 kPa for MRE and 6.9 kPa for VCTE were optimal to detect significant fibrosis in Hispanic individuals. Findings were validated in a Latin American cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower NIT cut-points may be needed to optimize surveillance for significant fibrosis due to MASLD in Hispanic populations commensurate with their higher burden and severity of disease.

Noninvasive Tests to Assess Fibrosis and Disease Severity in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease

Risk of disease progression and clinical outcomes in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is associated with fibrosis stage and presence of "at-risk metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH)." Although liver biopsy is considered the gold standard to diagnose MASH and stage of fibrosis, biopsy is infrequently performed in clinical practice and has associated sampling error, lack of interrater reliability, and risk for procedural complications. Noninvasive tests (NITs) are routinely used in clinical practice for risk stratification of patients with MASLD. Several NITs are being developed for detecting "at-risk MASH" and cirrhosis. Clinical care guidelines apply NITs to identify patients needing subspecialty referral. With recently approved Food and Drug Administration treatment for MASH and additional emerging pharmacotherapy, NITs will identify patients who will most benefit from treatment, monitor treatment response, and assess risk for long-term clinical outcomes. In this review, we examine the performance of NITs to detect "at-risk MASH," fibrosis stage, response to treatment, and risk of clinical outcomes in MASLD and MASH.

Surveillance of the liver in type 2 diabetes: important but unfeasible?

Fatty liver plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. According to an updated classification, any individual with liver steatosis and one or more features of the metabolic syndrome, without excess alcohol consumption or other known causes of steatosis, has metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Up to 60-70% of all individuals with type 2 diabetes have MASLD. However, the prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis in type 2 diabetes remains uncertain, with reported estimates of 10-20% relying on imaging tests and likely overestimating the true prevalence. All stages of MASLD impact prognosis but fibrosis is the best predictor of all-cause and liver-related mortality risk. People with type 2 diabetes face a two- to threefold increase in the risk of liver-related death and hepatocellular carcinoma, with 1.3% progressing to severe liver disease over 7.7 years. Because reliable methods for detecting steatosis are lacking, MASLD mostly remains an incidental finding on imaging. Regardless, several medical societies advocate for universal screening of individuals with type 2 diabetes for advanced fibrosis. Proposed screening pathways involve annual calculation of the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, followed by a secondary test such as transient elastography (TE) for intermediate-to-high-risk individuals. However, owing to unsatisfactory biomarker specificity, these pathways are expected to channel approximately 40% of all individuals with type 2 diabetes to TE and 20% to tertiary care, with a false discovery rate of up to 80%, raising concerns about feasibility. There is thus an urgent need to develop more effective strategies for surveying the liver in type 2 diabetes. Nonetheless, weight loss through lifestyle changes, pharmacotherapy or bariatric surgery remains the cornerstone of management, proving highly effective not only for metabolic comorbidities but also for MASLD. Emerging evidence suggests that fibrosis biomarkers may serve as tools for risk-based targeting of weight-loss interventions and potentially for monitoring response to therapy.

Prevalence and outcome of sarcopenia in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

BACKGROUND

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) includes a spectrum of conditions, progressing from mild steatosis to advanced fibrosis. Sarcopenia, characterized by decreased muscle strength and mass, shares common pathophysiological traits with NAFLD. An association exists between sarcopenia and increased NAFLD prevalence. However, data on the prevalence of sarcopenia in NAFLD and its impact on the outcomes of NAFLD remain inconsistent.

AIM

To analyze the prevalence and outcomes of sarcopenia in patients with NAFLD.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search for relevant studies in MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus from their inception to June 2023. We included studies that focused on patients with NAFLD, reported the prevalence of sarcopenia as the primary outcome, and examined secondary outcomes, such as liver fibrosis and other adverse events. We also used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for quality assessment.

RESULTS

Of the 29 studies included, the prevalence of sarcopenia in NAFLD varied widely (1.6% to 63.0%), with 20 studies reporting a prevalence of more than 10.0%. Substantial heterogeneity was noted in the measurement modalities for sarcopenia. Sarcopenia was associated with a higher risk of advanced fibrosis (odd ratio: 1.97, 95% confidence interval: 1.44-2.70). Increased odds were consistently observed in fibrosis assessment through biopsy, NAFLD fibrosis score/body mass index, aspartate aminotransferase to alanine aminotransferase ratio, diabetes (BARD) score, and transient elastography, whereas the fibrosis-4 score showed no such association. Sarcopenia in NAFLD was associated with a higher risk of steatohepatitis, insulin resistance, cardiovascular risks, and mortality.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review highlights the critical need for standardized diagnostic criteria and measurement methods for sarcopenia in NAFLD patients. The variability in study designs and assessment methods for sarcopenia and liver fibrosis may account for the inconsistent findings. This review demonstrates the multidimensional impact of sarcopenia on NAFLD, indicating its importance beyond liver-related events to include cardiovascular risks, mortality, and metabolic complications.

Noninvasive tests maintain high accuracy for advanced fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients with different nomenclatures of steatotic liver disease

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a new nomenclature proposed in 2023. We aimed to compare the diagnostic efficacy of noninvasive tests (NITs) for advanced fibrosis under different nomenclatures in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). A total of 844 patients diagnosed with CHB and concurrent steatotic liver disease (SLD) by liver biopsy were retrospectively enrolled and divided into four groups. The performances of fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio index (GPRI), aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI), and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) were compared among the four groups. The four NITs showed similar diagnostic efficacy for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), MASLD, and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) in patients with CHB with advanced fibrosis. LSM showed the most stable accuracy for NAFLD (AUC = 0.842), MASLD (AUC = 0.846), and MAFLD (AUC = 0.863) compared with other NITs (p < 0.05). Among the four NITs, APRI (AUC = 0.841) and GPRI (AUC = 0.844) performed best in patients with CHB & MetALD (p < 0.05). The cutoff value for GPRI in patients with CHB & MetALD was higher than that in the other three groups, while further comparisons of NITs at different fibrosis stages showed that the median GPRI of CHB & MetALD (1.113) at F3-4 was higher than that in the CHB & MASLD group (0.508) (p < 0.05). Current NITs perform adequately in patients with CHB and SLD; however, alterations in cutoff values for CHB & MetALD need to be noted.