Linezolid induced retinopathy

Linezolid optic neuropathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this article, we reviewed 67 reported cases of linezolid optic neuropathy and describe the common characteristics and expectations for recovery with an emphasis on recent findings in the literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

Linezolid classically causes a reversible, duration-dependent optic neuropathy. However, in our review, we found only 66.7% of patients recovered complete visual function. Vision loss most commonly affected visual acuity followed by visual field and color vision. We also found patients taking higher doses of linezolid experienced full recovery less often, suggesting a dose-dependent component of linezolid optic neuropathy. Linezolid use has increased in frequency and duration, especially in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis, and data indicate that these patients experience lower rates of complete vision recovery compared with patients taking linezolid for other indications.

SUMMARY

Linezolid is an effective medication for treating drug-resistant infections; however, it may result in optic neuropathy. It is reasonable for patients on linezolid to undergo screening examinations, especially those on higher doses or for prolonged duration of therapy.

Prevalence of long-term physical sequelae among patients treated with multi-drug and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Physical sequelae related to multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) are emerging and under-recognised global challenges. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the prevalence and the types of long-term physical sequelae associated with patients treated for MDR- and XDR-TB.

METHODS

We systematically searched CINAHL (EBSCO), MEDLINE (via Ovid), Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception through to July 1, 2022, and the last search was updated to January 23, 2023. We included studies reporting physical sequelae associated with all forms of drug-resistant TB, including rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB), MDR-TB, Pre-XDR-TB, and XDR-TB. The primary outcome of interest was long-term physical sequelae. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effect model to estimate the pooled proportion of physical sequelae. The sources of heterogeneity were explored through meta-regression using study characteristics as covariates. The research protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021250909).

FINDINGS

From 3047 unique publications identified, 66 studies consisting of 37,380 patients conducted in 30 different countries were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled estimate was 44.4% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 36.7-52.1) for respiratory sequelae, 26.7% (95% CI: 23.85-29.7) for hearing sequelae, 10.1% (95% CI: 7.0-13.2) for musculoskeletal sequelae, 8.4% (95% CI: 6.5-10.3) for neurological sequelae, 8.1% (95% CI: 6.3-10.0) for renal sequelae, 7.3% (95% CI: 5.1-9.4) for hepatic sequelae, and 4.5% (95% CI: 2.7-6.3) for visual sequelae. There was substantial heterogeneity in the estimates. The stratified analysis showed that the pooled prevalence of hearing sequelae was 26.6% (95% CI: 12.3-40.9), neurological sequelae was 31.5% (95% CI: 5.5-57.5), and musculoskeletal sequelae were 21.5% (95% CI: 9.9-33.1) for patients with XDR-TB, which were higher than the pooled prevalence of sequelae among patients with MDR-TB. Respiratory sequelae were the highest in low-income countries (59.3%) and after completion of MDR-TB treatment (57.7%).

INTERPRETATION

This systematic review found that long-term physical sequelae such as respiratory, hearing, musculoskeletal, neurological, renal, hepatic, and visual sequelae were common among survivors of MDR- and XDR-TB. There was a significant difference in the prevalence of sequelae between patients with MDR- and XDR-TB. Post-MDR- and XDR-TB treatment surveillance for adverse outcomes needs to be incorporated into the current programmatic management of MDR-TB to enable early detection and prevention of post-treatment sequelae.

FUNDING

Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, through an Emerging Leadership Investigator grant, and the Curtin University Higher Degree Research scholarship.

Linezolid-Induced Toxic Optic Neuropathy

To report a case of linezolid-induced toxic optic neuropathy. Clinical examination and imaging are presented over a 4-month interval from initial presentation to subsequent follow-up of 4 months after discontinuation of linezolid. The patient was found to have optic neuropathy as demonstrated by clinical presentation and examination. Upon discontinuation of linezolid, the patient's visual acuity, visual fields, and color vision significantly improved. Linezolid has previously been reported to cause toxic optic neuropathy and retinopathy. We hereby describe a tuberculosis patient with linezolid-associated toxic optic neuropathy. Our report aims to describe the ocular side effects of linezolid use to enhance awareness.

Preparation and Evaluation of a Xanthan Gum-Containing Linezolid Ophthalmic Solution for Topical Treatment of Experimental Bacterial Keratitis

PURPOSE

To formulate a xanthan gum-containing linezolid ophthalmic solution (LZD-XG) as a new antibiotic treatment against ocular bacterial infection.

METHODS

LZD-XG was prepared and evaluated for its in vitro/in vivo ocular tolerance, in vitro/in vivo antibacterial activity, and in vivo ocular penetration.

RESULTS

The optimized LZD-XG exhibited good in vitro/in vivo eye tolerance. A prolonged ocular surface residence time of LZD-XG was observed after topical instillation, and the ocular permeation was significantly better for LZD-XG than fora linezolid (LZD) ophthalmic solution. The in vitro antimicrobial activity was significantly better with LZD-XG than with LZD. In vivo evaluation also confirmed a strong therapeutic treatment effect of LZD-XG, as it significantly improved the clinical symptoms, ameliorated the damage of Staphylococcus aureus to ocular tissues, lowered the colony forming unit counts in the cornea, and decreased the myeloperoxidase activity in the cornea.

CONCLUSION

LZD-XG was deemed a viable ophthalmic solution against ocular bacterial infection due to its excellent in vitro and in vivo characterizations.

Linezolid-induced photoreceptor dysfunction masquerading as autoimmune retinopathy

PURPOSE

To report a case of linezolid-induced reversible retinopathy.

METHODS

Case report with literature review.

RESULTS

Clinical examination and imaging are presented over a 7-month interval, from initial presentation to subsequent follow-up (6 months after discontinuation of linezolid). The subject was found to have not only an optic neuropathy but also severe reversible photoreceptor dysfunction as demonstrated by electrophysiologic testing. Upon discontinuation of linezolid, not only did the patient's visual acuity, visual fields, and visual evoked potential significantly improve, but the electroretinogram did as well.

CONCLUSIONS

Linezolid has previously been reported to cause a toxic optic neuropathy. Reversible photoreceptor dysfunction on full-field electroretinography has never been reported in conjunction with linezolid toxicity. This novel case suggests that linezolid toxicity should be considered in cases of photoreceptor dysfunction.

Linezolid-associated optic neuropathy in a pediatric patient with Mycobacterium nonchromogenicum: A case report

BACKGROUND

Toxic optic neuropathies are alterations of the optic nerve and can be caused by environmental, pharmacological, or nutritional agents.

CASE

It is about a 7-year-old male patient, a native of the State of Mexico, Mexico who was diagnosed with cervical mycobacterial lymphadenitis that required management with linezolid.

OBSERVATIONS

After 7 months of treatment, visual acuity of the left eye decreased and was accompanied by headache. Neuroinfection and other central nervous system affections were discarded. An adverse effect related to treatment with linezolid was suspected, and linezolid was suspended. The symptoms subsided after discontinuation; however, the patient continued to show decreased visual acuity of the left eye, assessed by his ability to count 2 fingers. The right eye remained unaffected.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurotoxicity can be decreased by reducing the total dose of linezolid or by administrating it in an intermittent form. To avoid progression and loss of vision, we suggest frequent periodic ophthalmological evaluation in patients treated with linezolid.