Differences in oxazolidinone resistance mechanisms and small colony variants emergence of Staphylococcus aureus induced in an in vitro resistance development model

Invasive Staphylococcus aureus infections are associated with a high burden of disease, case fatality rate and healthcare costs. Oxazolidinones such as linezolid and tedizolid are considered potential treatment choices for conditions involving methicillin resistance or penicillin allergies. Additionally, they are being investigated as potential inhibitors of toxins in toxin-mediated diseases. In this study, linezolid and tedizolid were evaluated in an in vitro resistance development model for induction of resistance in S. aureus. Whole genome sequencing was conducted to elucidate resistance mechanisms through the identification of causal mutations. After inducing resistance to both linezolid and tedizolid, several partially novel single nucleotide variants (SNVs) were detected in the rplC gene, which encodes the 50S ribosome protein L3 in S. aureus. These SNVs were found to decrease the binding affinity, potentially serving as the underlying cause for oxazolidinone resistance. Furthermore, in opposite to linezolid we were able to induce phenotypically small colony variants of S. aureus after induction of resistance with tedizolid for the first time in literature. In summary, even if different antibiotic concentrations were required and SNVs were detected, the principal capacity of S. aureus to develop resistance to oxazolidinones seems to differ between linezolid and tedizolid in-vivo but not in vitro. Stepwise induction of resistance seems to be a time and cost-effective tool for assessing resistance evolution. Inducted-resistant strains should be examined and documented for epidemiological reasons, if MICs start to rise or oxazolidinone-resistant S. aureus outbreaks become more frequent.

A Case Series on Serotonin Syndrome from Concomitant use of linezolid With Methadone, Buprenorphine, and/or Dextroamphetamine

Background and Objectives: The risk of serotonin syndrome (SS), especially when linezolid is used concomitantly with methadone, buprenorphine, and/or dextroamphetamine, remains widely unstudied and may limit the options for antimicrobial therapy in these patient populations. Methods: We reviewed all adult encounters on linezolid with concomitant methadone, buprenorphine, and/or dextroamphetamine from April 2016 to June 2022. The primary outcomes included characterizing prescribing preferences and prevalence of confirmed and possible serotonin syndrome using ICD-10 diagnosis codes, cyproheptadine administration, and electronic medical record chart review using the Hunter Serotonin Toxicity Criteria. Results: Overall, 194 encounters were evaluated. 16.5%, 17.8%, and 7.1% were on high dose methadone, buprenorphine, and dextroamphetamine, respectively. Mean duration of overlap with linezolid was 4.6, 3.3, and 7 days respectively. One confirmed and two possible cases of serotonin syndrome were identified. Conclusion: Linezolid may be considered in patients who are concomitantly on methadone, buprenorphine, and/or dextroamphetamine. In our analysis of 194 encounters, one definitive case and two possible cases of SS were identified. Additional real-world studies are necessary to identify if exposure and/or duration may be correlated with an increased risk of serotonin syndrome.

Assessing potential drug-drug interactions between clofazimine and other frequently used agents to treat drug-resistant tuberculosis

Clofazimine is included in drug regimens to treat rifampicin/drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB), but there is little information about its interaction with other drugs in DR-TB regimens. We evaluated the pharmacokinetic interaction between clofazimine and isoniazid, linezolid, levofloxacin, and cycloserine, dosed as terizidone. Newly diagnosed adults with DR-TB at Klerksdorp/Tshepong Hospital, South Africa, were started on the then-standard treatment with clofazimine temporarily excluded for the initial 2 weeks. Pharmacokinetic sampling was done immediately before and 3 weeks after starting clofazimine, and drug concentrations were determined using validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assays. The data were interpreted with population pharmacokinetics in NONMEM v7.5.1 to explore the impact of clofazimine co-administration and other relevant covariates on the pharmacokinetics of isoniazid, linezolid, levofloxacin, and cycloserine. Clofazimine, isoniazid, linezolid, levofloxacin, and cycloserine data were available for 16, 27, 21, 21, and 6 participants, respectively. The median age and weight for the full cohort were 39 years and 52 kg, respectively. Clofazimine exposures were in the expected range, and its addition to the regimen did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of the other drugs except levofloxacin, for which it caused a 15% reduction in clearance. A posteriori power size calculations predicted that our sample sizes had 97%, 90%, and 87% power at P < 0.05 to detect a 30% change in clearance of isoniazid, linezolid, and cycloserine, respectively. Although clofazimine increased the area under the curve of levofloxacin by 19%, this is unlikely to be of great clinical significance, and the lack of interaction with other drugs tested is reassuring.

Use of multiple pharmacodynamic measures to deconstruct the Nix-TB regimen in a short-course murine model of tuberculosis

A major challenge for tuberculosis (TB) drug development is to prioritize promising combination regimens from a large and growing number of possibilities. This includes demonstrating individual drug contributions to the activity of higher-order combinations. A BALB/c mouse TB infection model was used to evaluate the contributions of each drug and pairwise combination in the clinically relevant Nix-TB regimen [bedaquiline-pretomanid-linezolid (BPaL)] during the first 3 weeks of treatment at human equivalent doses. The rRNA synthesis (RS) ratio, an exploratory pharmacodynamic (PD) marker of ongoing Mycobacterium tuberculosis rRNA synthesis, together with solid culture CFU counts and liquid culture time to positivity (TTP) were used as PD markers of treatment response in lung tissue; and their time-course profiles were mathematically modeled using rate equations with pharmacologically interpretable parameters. Antimicrobial interactions were quantified using Bliss independence and Isserlis formulas. Subadditive (or antagonistic) and additive effects on bacillary load, assessed by CFU and TTP, were found for bedaquiline-pretomanid and linezolid-containing pairs, respectively. In contrast, subadditive and additive effects on rRNA synthesis were found for pretomanid-linezolid and bedaquiline-containing pairs, respectively. Additionally, accurate predictions of the response to BPaL for all three PD markers were made using only the single-drug and pairwise effects together with an assumption of negligible three-way drug interactions. The results represent an experimental and PD modeling approach aimed at reducing combinatorial complexity and improving the cost-effectiveness of in vivo systems for preclinical TB regimen development.

Adverse reactions caused by high serum concentration of linezolid: Two case reports and literature review

Linezolid is a potent oxazolidinone for the treatment of various gram-positive bacterial infections. However, the drug can cause potential adverse reactions such as thrombocytopenia, hyperlactacidemia and serotonin syndrome, which warrant consideration by the medical team when planning treatment. The existing literature has reported some adverse reactions caused by linezolid, but most of these are based on clinical characteristics and simple treatment measures. Two cases of linezolid overdose resulting in thrombocytopenia, hyperlactacidemia and serotonin syndrome are presented, which were successfully managed with therapeutic drug monitoring. A dose adjustment strategy was adopted to safely and effectively mitigate linezolid-related adverse events.

Linezolid-Associated Thrombocytopenia: Assessment of Risk Factors in Patients without Hemato-Oncologic Diseases

Background: Linezolid is used for Gram-positive bacterial infections. Thrombocytopenia is one of its main adverse effects resulting from myelosuppression. Several studies have assessed risk factors that may increase the risk of this adverse effect. However, most studies included patients with hemato-oncologic diseases, which may confound such assessments. This study aimed to investigate risk factors for linezolid-associated thrombocytopenia in patients without hemato-oncologic diseases. Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective case-control study of adult patients treated with linezolid twice daily for ≥3 days. Patients with hemato-oncologic diseases, active dengue fever, active COVID-19, baseline platelet count <100 × 103/mm3, concurrent therapy with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or valproic acid, and a recent platelet transfusion within 7 days were excluded. Thrombocytopenia was defined as a drop in platelet count below 100 × 103/mm3. Results: Out of 158 evaluated patients, 33 developed thrombocytopenia, indicating an incidence rate of 20.9%. Of all the risk factors assessed, creatinine clearance of <60 mL/min and bacteremia/infective endocarditis were significantly associated with linezolid-associated thrombocytopenia (adjusted odds ratios, 3.25 and 5.95; 95% CI 1.12-9.45 and 1.23-28.66; p = 0.031 and 0.026, respectively). End of therapy platelet counts were significantly lower in the cases than in the controls (79 vs. 243 × 103/mm3; p < 0.001). Similarly, the percentage of platelet count change was significantly different (-55.1% vs. -10.2%; p < 0.001). Conclusions: In our study, the incidence rate of linezolid-associated thrombocytopenia was 20.9%, and we found that patients with renal impairment and bacteremia may need close monitoring of platelet counts. Prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the potential need for renal dose adjustment.

Linezolid Population Pharmacokinetic Model in Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid Among Patients With Tuberculosis Meningitis

BACKGROUND

Linezolid is evaluated in novel treatment regimens for tuberculous meningitis (TBM). Linezolid pharmacokinetics have not been characterized in this population, particularly in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), as well as, following its co-administration with high-dose rifampicin. We aimed to characterize linezolid plasma and CSF pharmacokinetics in adults with TBM.

METHODS

In the LASER-TBM pharmacokinetic substudy, the intervention groups received high-dose rifampicin (35 mg/kg) plus 1200 mg/day of linezolid for 28 days, which was then reduced to 600 mg/day. Plasma sampling was done on day 3 (intensive) and day 28 (sparse). A lumbar CSF sample was obtained on both visits.

RESULTS

Thirty participants contributed 247 plasma and 28 CSF observations. Their median age and weight were 40 years (range, 27-56) and 58 kg (range, 30-96). Plasma pharmacokinetics was described by a 1-compartment model with first-order absorption and saturable elimination. Maximal clearance was 7.25 L/h, and the Michaelis-Menten constant was 27.2 mg/L. Rifampicin cotreatment duration did not affect linezolid pharmacokinetics. CSF-plasma partitioning correlated with CSF total protein up to 1.2 g/L, where the partition coefficient reached a maximal value of 37%. The plasma-CSF equilibration half-life was ∼3.5 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Linezolid was readily detected in CSF despite high-dose rifampicin coadministration. These findings support continued clinical evaluation of linezolid plus high-dose rifampicin for the treatment of TBM in adults. Clinical Trials Registration.  ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03927313).

Effect of mango butter on the physicochemical properties of beeswax-Moringa seed oil-based oleogels for topical application

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this research was to determine any connections between the characteristics of oleogels made of beeswax and the impact of mango butter.

METHODS

Oleogel was prepared through inverted tube methods, and optimized through oil binding capacity. Other evaluations like bright field and polarized microscopy, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, crystallization kinetics, mechanical study, and X-ray diffractometry (XRD). The drug release kinetic studies and in vitro antibacterial studies were performed.

RESULTS

FTIR study reveals that the gelation process does not significantly alter the chemical composition of the individual components. Prepared gel exhibiting fluid-like behavior or composed of brittle networks is particularly vulnerable to disruptions in their network design. The incorporation of mango butter increases the drug permeation. In-vitro microbial efficacy study was found to be excellent.

CONCLUSION

The studies revealed that mango butter can be used to modify the physico-chemical properties of the oleogels.

Bactericidal and sterilizing activity of novel regimens combining bedaquiline or TBAJ-587 with GSK2556286 and TBA-7371 in a mouse model of tuberculosis

The combination of bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid (BPaL) has become a preferred regimen for treating multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB). However, treatment-limiting toxicities of linezolid and reports of emerging bedaquiline and pretomanid resistance necessitate efforts to develop new short-course oral regimens. We recently found that the addition of GSK2556286 increases the bactericidal and sterilizing activity of BPa-containing regimens in a well-established BALB/c mouse model of tuberculosis. Here, we used this model to evaluate the potential of new regimens combining bedaquiline or the more potent diarylquinoline TBAJ-587 with GSK2556286 and the DprE1 inhibitor TBA-7371, all of which are currently in early-phase clinical trials. We found the combination of bedaquiline, GSK2556286, and TBA-7371 to be more active than the first-line regimen and nearly as effective as BPaL in terms of bactericidal and sterilizing activity. In addition, we found that GSK2556286 and TBA-7371 were as effective as pretomanid and the novel oxazolidinone TBI-223 when either drug pair was combined with TBAJ-587 and that the addition of GSK2556286 increased the bactericidal activity of the TBAJ-587, pretomanid, and TBI-223 combination. We conclude that GSK2556286 and TBA-7371 have the potential to replace pretomanid, an oxazolidinone, or both components, in combination with bedaquiline or TBAJ-587.

A Diagnostic Dilemma: Clindamycin-Resistant Group A Streptococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome Leading to Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) With Multiple Possible Sources

Group A Streptococcal (GAS) infections can potentially progress into streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS) with multiorgan failure. Even with a benign presentation, GAS can rapidly lead to fatal necrotizing infections. While myositis and cutaneous infections are the typical initial presentation of STSS, genitourinary infections are a less common source. This report presents a case of a previously healthy woman with the chief complaint of ankle pain who subsequently developed streptococcal toxic shock syndrome and multiorgan failure from a Group A streptococcus infection of the genitourinary tract. She was treated with antibiotics and medical management for her septic shock and required prone ventilation for her acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) but eventually recovered without surgery. This case highlights the importance of recognizing unusual presentations of Group A Strep infections, which have the potential to lead to rapid deterioration in patients. Also described are antibiotic and ventilator strategies that can be used to treat these severe systemic infections.

Treating Pythiosis with Antibacterial Drugs Targeting Protein Synthesis: An Overview

This review article explores the effectiveness of antibacterial drugs that inhibit protein synthesis in treating pythiosis, a difficult-to-treat infection caused by Pythium insidiosum. The article highlights the susceptibility of P. insidiosum to antibacterial drugs, such as macrolides, oxazolidinones, and tetracyclines. We examine various studies, including in vitro tests, experimental infection models, and clinical case reports. Based on our synthesis of these findings, we highlight the potential of these drugs in managing pythiosis, primarily when combined with surgical interventions. The review emphasizes the need for personalized treatment strategies and further research to establish standardized testing protocols and optimize therapeutic approaches.

The Safety and Tolerability of Linezolid in Novel Short-Course Regimens Containing Bedaquiline, Pretomanid, and Linezolid to Treat Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Effectiveness, safety, tolerability, and adherence are critical considerations in shifting to shorter tuberculosis (TB) regimens. Novel 6-month oral regimens that include bedaquiline (B), pretomanid (Pa), and linezolid (L), with or without a fourth drug, have been shown to be as or more effective than the established longer regimens for the treatment of multidrug-resistant/rifampicin-resistant TB (MDR/RR-TB). We aimed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of linezolid in BPaL-containing regimens for the treatment of MDR/RR-TB among recently completed clinical trials.

METHODS

A review and meta-analysis was undertaken including published and unpublished data from clinical trials, conducted between 2010 and 2021, that evaluated regimens containing BPaL for the treatment of MDR/RR-TB. Individual patient data were obtained. For each BPaL-containing regimen, we evaluated the frequency and severity of treatment-related adverse events. The risk difference of adverse events for each regimen was calculated, in comparison to patients assigned to receiving the lowest cumulative exposure of linezolid.

RESULTS

Data from 3 clinical trials investigating 8 unique BPaL-containing regimens were included, comprising a total of 591 participants. Adverse events were more frequent in groups randomized to a higher cumulative linezolid dose. Among patients who were randomized to a daily dose of 1200 mg linezolid, 68 of 195 (35%) experienced a grade 3-4 adverse event versus 89 of 396 (22%) patients receiving BPaL-containing regimens containing 600 mg linezolid.

CONCLUSIONS

Regimens containing BPaL were relatively well tolerated when they included a daily linezolid dose of 600 mg. These novel regimens promise to improve the tolerability of treatment for MDR/RR-TB.

Prevalence of linezolid resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim: This study aimed to understand the current level of linezolid (LNZ) resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates reported over the past 10 years. Material & methods: An electronic search was conducted for the following keywords: ((Streptococcus pneumoniae [title/abstract]) OR (Pneumococcus [title/abstract]) OR (Pneumococci [title/abstract]) AND (linezolid [title/abstract]) OR (Zyvox [title/abstract])) OR (Zyvoxid [title/abstract])). Result: Out of all the studies, 80 had a cross-sectional design, while 11 followed a cohort approach. The prevalence of LNZ resistance among S. pneumoniae isolates ranged from 0% to 4.86%. Discussion: Urgent, high-powered, randomized, controlled trials with participants from endemic regions are needed to gain a comprehensive understanding of the impact on and significance of LNZ treatment to patients.

Linezolid Toxicity: A Clinical Case Report

Linezolid plays a clinically important role; however, it is responsible for severe pharmacological interactions and side effects, such as myelosuppression, serotonin syndrome, and lactic acidosis. We report a case of an 80-year-old man treated with venlafaxine for depression. He was admitted with a right femur fracture and submitted to surgical intervention, complicated by local infection. In collected pus was identified multiple microorganisms including Enterococcus faecium resistant to vancomycin. The therapeutic was adjusted to linezolid. On the 36th day of treatment, he developed hypertension, poor peripheral perfusion, and generalized tremor. He was disoriented, with marbled skin, myoclonus, and sinus tachycardia; and apyretic, with no signs of respiratory distress or joint/surgical wound inflammatory signs. Blood tests showed hyperlacticemia and discrete elevation of C-reactive protein but in a decrescent trend, with no other relevant alterations. The diagnosis of lactic acidosis and probable serotonin syndrome secondary to linezolid was made, supported by improvement after the drug suspension.

Prediction of risk factors for linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia based on neural network model

Background: Based on real-world medical data, the artificial neural network model was used to predict the risk factors of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia to provide a reference for better clinical use of this drug and achieve the timely prevention of adverse reactions. Methods: The artificial neural network algorithm was used to construct the prediction model of the risk factors of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia and further evaluate the effectiveness of the artificial neural network model compared with the traditional Logistic regression model. Results: A total of 1,837 patients receiving linezolid treatment in a hospital in Xi 'an, Shaanxi Province from 1 January 2011 to 1 January 2021 were recruited. According to the exclusion criteria, 1,273 cases that did not meet the requirements of the study were excluded. A total of 564 valid cases were included in the study, with 89 (15.78%) having thrombocytopenia. The prediction accuracy of the artificial neural network model was 96.32%, and the AUROC was 0.944, which was significantly higher than that of the Logistic regression model, which was 86.14%, and the AUROC was 0.796. In the artificial neural network model, urea, platelet baseline value and serum albumin were among the top three important risk factors. Conclusion: The predictive performance of the artificial neural network model is better than that of the traditional Logistic regression model, and it can well predict the risk factors of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia.

Adverse drug events associated with linezolid administration: a real-world pharmacovigilance study from 2004 to 2023 using the FAERS database

Introduction: Linezolid is an oxazolidinone antibiotic that is active against drug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria and multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Real-world studies on the safety of linezolid in large populations are lacking. This study aimed to determine the adverse events associated with linezolid in real-world settings by analyzing data from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: We retrospectively extracted reports on adverse drug events (ADEs) from the FAERS database from the first quarter of 2004 to that of 2023. By using disproportionality analysis including reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), along with the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS), we evaluated whether there was a significant association between linezolid and ADE. The time to onset of ADE was further analyzed in the general population and within each age, weight, reporting population, and weight subgroups. Results: A total of 11,176 reports of linezolid as the "primary suspected" drug and 263 significant adverse events of linezolid were identified, including some common adverse events such as thrombocytopenia (n = 1,139, ROR 21.98), anaemia (n = 704, ROR 7.39), and unexpected signals that were not listed on the drug label such as rhabdomyolysis (n = 90, ROR 4.33), and electrocardiogram QT prolonged (n = 73, ROR 4.07). Linezolid-induced adverse reactions involved 27 System Organ Class (SOC). Gender differences existed in ADE signals related to linezolid. The median onset time of all ADEs was 6 days, and most ADEs (n = 3,778) occurred within the first month of linezolid use but some may continue to occur even after a year of treatment (n = 46). Conclusion: This study reports the time to onset of adverse effects in detail at the levels of SOC and specific preferred term (PT). The results of our study provide valuable insights for optimizing the use of linezolid and reducing potential side effects, expected to facilitate the safe use of linezolid in clinical settings.

Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Linezolid and Probability of Target Attainment in Patients with COVID-19-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome on Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-A Step toward Correct Dosing

During veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv ECMO) therapy, antimicrobial drugs are frequently used, and appropriate dosing is challenging due to there being limited data to support the dosage. Linezolid is effective against multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens frequently isolated in ECMO patients. In total, 53 steady-state linezolid levels were obtained following 600 mg intravenous (IV) injections every 8 h, and these were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model in patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) on vv ECMO. The data were analyzed using a nonlinear mixed-effects modelling approach. Monte Carlo simulation generated 5000 patients' individual PK parameters and corresponding concentration-time profiles using the PopPK model, following the administration of 600 mg/8 h (a higher-than-standard dosing) and 600 mg/12 h (standard). The probabilities of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of responses (CFR) for three pathogens were calculated and compared between the two dosing scenarios. Linezolid 600 mg/8 h was predicted to achieve greater than or equal to 85%Tf>MIC in at least 90% of the patients with CARDS on vv ECMO compared to only approximately two thirds of the patients after dosing every 12 h at a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 2 mg/L. In addition, for the same MIC, fAUC24/MIC ≥ 80 was achieved in almost three times the number of patients following an 8-h versus a 12-h interval. PopPK simulation predicted that a significantly higher proportion of the patients with CARDS on vv ECMO would achieve the PK/PD targets following the 8-h dosing interval compared to standard linezolid dosing. Nevertheless, the safety concern, in particular, for thrombocytopenia, with higher-than-standard linezolid dosage is reasonable, and consequently, monitoring is essential.

Theoretical study of the interaction between the antibiotic linezolid and the active site of the 50S ribosomal subunit of the bacterium Haloarcula marismortui

First antibiotic in the oxazolidinone class, linezolid fights gram-positive multiresistant bacteria by inhibiting protein synthesis through its interaction with the 50S subunit of the functional bacterial ribosome. For its antimicrobial action, it is necessary that its chiral carbon located in the oxazolidinone ring is in the S-conformation. Computational calculation at time-dependent density functional theory methodology, ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis), and electronic circular dichroism spectra was obtained for noncomplexed and complexed forms of linezolid to verify the possible chirality of nitrogen atom in the acetamide group of the molecule. The molecular system has two chiral centers. So, there are now four possible configurations: RR, RS, SR, and SS. For a better understanding of the system, the electronic spectra at the PBE0/6-311++G(3df,2p) level of theory were obtained. The complexed form was obtained from the crystallographic data of the ribosome, containing the S-linezolid molecular system. The computational results obtained for the electronic properties are in good agreement with the experimental crystallographic data and available theoretical results.

Exploring the Synergy between Nano-Formulated Linezolid and Polymyxin B as a Gram-Negative Effective Antibiotic Delivery System Based on Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles

Antimicrobial resistance is a current silent pandemic that needs new types of antimicrobial agents different from the classic antibiotics that are known to lose efficiency over time. Encapsulation of antibiotics inside nano-delivery systems could be a promising, effective strategy that is able to delay the capability of pathogens to develop resistance mechanisms against antimicrobials. These systems can be adapted to deliver already discovered antibiotics to specific infection sites in a more successful way. Herein, mesoporous silica nanomaterials are used for an efficient delivery of a linezolid gram-positive antibiotic that acts synergistically with gram-negative antimicrobial polymyxin B. For this purpose, linezolid is encapsulated in the pores of the mesoporous silica, whose outer surface is coated with a polymyxin B membrane disruptor. The nanomaterial showed a good controlled-release performance in the presence of lipopolysaccharide, found in bacteria cell membranes, and the complete bacteria E. coli DH5α. The performed studies demonstrate that when the novel formulation is near bacteria, polymyxin B interacts with the cell membrane, thereby promoting its permeation. After this step, linezolid can easily penetrate the bacteria and act with efficacy to kill the microorganism. The nano-delivery system presents a highly increased antimicrobial efficacy against gram-negative bacteria, where the use of free linezolid is not effective, with a fractional inhibitory concentration index of 0.0063 for E. coli. Moreover, enhanced toxicity against gram-positive bacteria was confirmed thanks to the combination of both antibiotics in the same nanoparticles. Although this new nanomaterial should be further studied to reach clinical practice, the obtained results pave the way to the development of new nanoformulations which could help in the fight against bacterial infections.

Towards a better detection of patients at-risk of linezolid toxicity in clinical practice: a prospective study in three Belgian hospital centers

Introduction: Linezolid is a last-resort antibiotic for infections caused by multidrug-resistant microorganisms. It is widely used for off-label indications and for longer than recommended treatment durations, exposing patients at higher risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), notably thrombocytopenia. This study aimed to investigate ADR incidence and risk factors, identify thrombocytopenia-related trough levels based on treatment duration, and evaluate the performance of predictive scores for ADR development. Methods: Adult in- and outpatients undergoing linezolid therapy were enrolled in three hospitals and ADRs and linezolid trough levels prospectively monitored over time. A population pharmacokinetic (pop-PK model) was used to estimate trough levels for blood samples collected at varying times. Results: A multivariate analysis based on 63 treatments identified treatment duration ≥10 days and trough levels >8 mg/L as independent risk factors of developing thrombocytopenia, with high trough values correlated with impaired renal function. Five patients treated for >28 days did not develop thrombocytopenia but maintained trough values in the target range (<8 mg/L). The Buzelé predictive score, which combines an age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index with treatment duration, demonstrated 77% specificity and 67% sensitivity to predict the risk of ADR. Conclusion: Our work supports the necessity of establishing guidelines for dose adjustment in patients with renal insufficiency and the systematic use of TDM in patients at-risk in order to keep trough values ≤8 mg/L. The Buzelé predictive score (if ≥7) may help to detect these at-risk patients, and pop-PK models can estimate trough levels based on plasma samples collected at varying times, reducing the logistical burden of TDM in clinical practice.

Antibiotic Resistance to Molecules Commonly Prescribed for the Treatment of Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Positive Pathogens: What Is Relevant for the Clinician?

Antibiotic resistance in Gram-positive pathogens is a relevant concern, particularly in the hospital setting. Several antibiotics are now available to treat these drug-resistant pathogens, such as daptomycin, dalbavancin, linezolid, tedizolid, ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, and fosfomycin. However, antibiotic resistance can also affect these newer molecules. Overall, this is not a frequent phenomenon, but it is a growing concern in some settings and can compromise the effectiveness of these molecules, leaving few therapeutic options. We reviewed the available evidence about the epidemiology of antibiotic resistance to these antibiotics and the main molecular mechanisms of resistance, particularly methicillin-resistant Sthaphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. We discussed the interpretation of susceptibility tests when minimum inhibitory concentrations are not available. We focused on the risk of the emergence of resistance during treatment, particularly for daptomycin and fosfomycin, and we discussed the strategies that can be implemented to reduce this phenomenon, which can lead to clinical failure despite appropriate antibiotic treatment. The judicious use of antibiotics, epidemiological surveillance, and infection control measures is essential to preserving the efficacy of these drugs.

Formulation and Optimization of Solid Lipid Nanoparticle-based Gel for Dermal Delivery of Linezolid Using Taguchi Design

BACKGROUND

Linezolid (LNZ) is a synthetic oxazolidinone antibiotic approved for the treatment of uncomplicated and complicated skin and soft tissue infections caused by gram-positive bacteria. Typically, LNZ is administered orally or intravenously in most cases. However, prolonged therapy is associated with various side effects and life threatening complications. Cutaneous application of LNZ will assist in reducing the dose, hence minimizing the unwanted side/adverse effects associated with oral administration. Dermal delivery provides an alternative route of administration, facilitating a local and sustained concentration of the antimicrobial at the site of infection.

OBJECTIVE

The current research work aimed to formulate solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) based gel for dermal delivery of LNZ in the management of uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections to maximise its benefits and minimise the side effects.

METHODS

SLNs were prepared by high-shear homogenisation and ultrasound method using Dynasan 114 as solid lipid and Pluronic F-68 as surfactant. The effect of surfactant concentration, drug-to-lipid ratio, and sonication time was investigated on particle size, zeta potential, and entrapment efficiency using the Taguchi design. The main effect plot of means and signal-to-noise ratio were generated to determine the optimized formulation. The optimized batch was formulated into a gel, and ex-vivo permeation study, in-vitro and in-vivo antibacterial activity were conducted.

RESULTS

The optimised process parameters to achieve results were 2% surfactant concentration, a drug-to-lipid ratio of 1:2, and 360 s of sonication time. The optimized batch was 206.3± 0.17nm in size with a surface charge of -24.4± 4.67mV and entrapment efficiency of 80.90 ± 0.45%. SLN-based gel demonstrated anomalous transport with an 85.43% in vitro drug release. The gel showed a 5 cm zone of inhibition while evaluated for in vitro antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus. Ex-vivo skin permeation studies demonstrated 20.308% drug permeation and 54.96% cutaneous deposition. In-vivo results showed a significant reduction in colony-forming units in the group treated with LNZ SLN-based gel.

CONCLUSION

Ex-vivo studies ascertain the presence of the drug at the desired site and improve therapy. In-vivo results demonstrated the ability of SLN-based gel to significantly reduce the number of bacteria in the stripped infection model. The utilization of SLN as an LNZ carrier holds significant promise in dermal delivery.

Assessment of carvacrol-antibiotic combinations' antimicrobial activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Introduction

This study aimed to assess the antimicrobial activity of carvacrol in combination with approved antibiotics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Carvacrol, a phenolic monoterpenoid component of essential oils, has demonstrated antimicrobial properties against gram positive and gram negative bacteria. The study evaluated the antimicrobial effects of carvacrol combined with sulfamethoxazole, linezolid, minocycline, and trimethoprim.

Methods

The MRSA strain (ATCC-33591) was used, and various assays, including MIC determination, checkerboard assay, and microdilution assay were conducted.

Results

The results showed that the combination of carvacrol with antibiotics yielded better outcomes compared to monotherapy, leading to reduced bacterial colonization. Carvacrol, sulfamethoxazole, and trimethoprim exhibited weak anti-staphylococcal effects, while linezolid and minocycline demonstrated stronger effects. This suggests that conventional antibiotic therapy may not be sufficient to effectively treat MRSA infections, potentially causing delays in healing or an exacerbation of the condition. Carvacrol combinations with two antibiotics displayed superior results compared to other pairs, indicating synergistic or additive effects of carvacrol with linezolid, minocycline, and sulfamethoxazole.

Conclusion

These findings propose a new approach for developing drug molecules for MRSA treatment which combine volatile oils with available regimens. Further studies are recommended to evaluate the efficacy and biosafety of these combinations using in vivo or ex vivo models, aiming to minimize side effects and facilitate human trials. This study provides valuable insights into the potential use of carvacrol-antibiotic combinations as a novel therapeutic approach against MRSA.

A Case Series on Acenocoumarol and Linezolid Drug Interaction

Acenocoumarol is one of the most common drugs used as a part of the management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Linezolid, on the other hand, is an antibiotic prescribed post-operatively. Reports of any interaction between the two are very few. Here, we are presenting four case reports of patients admitted to the Cardio Thoracic and Vascular Surgery Department of a tertiary healthcare center in North East India. Drug-drug interactions can lead to long-term and life-threatening effects, and also hamper the management of patients post-operatively. Due to the limited literature, assessing such interactions is difficult. The cases reported here were treated with fresh frozen plasma, and the patients responded well to the treatment and were discharged without further complications.

Fosfomycin Enhances the Inhibition Ability of Linezolid Against Biofilms of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium in vitro

Purpose

We explored the inhibition ability of linezolid/fosfomycin combination against biofilms of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) and tried to provide a theoretical basis for the treatment of VREfm biofilm-associated infections.

Methods

Four clinical isolates of VREfm (No.2, No.4, No.5, and No.6) were used for this study, which were collected from the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. The checkerboard method was used to assess the synergistic effect of linezolid and fosfomycin. The inhibition ability of biofilm biomass was evaluated by crystal violet staining, and the metabolic activity was tested by an Alamar blue cell viability assay. Changes in biofilm formation-related genes of the strains after incubating with drugs were investigated via the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).

Results

The fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) showed that linezolid combined with fosfomycin had a synergistic effect on all four VREfm isolates. Compared with linezolid monotherapy, linezolid combined with fosfomycin led to a significant decrease in biofilm biomass and metabolic activity, especially in the mature biofilm. The results of RT-qPCR showed linezolid combined with fosfomycin inhibition biofilm formation through the inhibition of cylA, ebpA, and gelE transcription in VREfm in the initial and mature stages. To the mature biofilm, the combination also reduced the expression of asa1, atlA, and esp.

Conclusion

The combination of linezolid and fosfomycin represented stronger inhibitory effect on the biofilm formation of VREfm than linezolid alone.

Uncommon Septic Arthritis of the Hip Joint in an Immunocompetent Adult Patient Due to Bacillus pumilus and Paenibacillus barengoltzii Managed with Long-Term Treatment with Linezolid: A Case Report and Short Literature Review

The Bacillus and Paenibacillus genera are diverse soil-related bacterial pathogens. In this case report, we describe, to our knowledge, the first report of septic arthritis in a native hip joint in an immunocompetent adult patient caused by Bacillus pumilus and Paenibacillus barengoltzii. We describe the case of a 39-year-old Caucasian male patient who sought medical advice for chronic pain on the mobilization of the right hip, decreased range of motion, and physical asthenia. The patient underwent a surgical intervention (core decompression) for a right osteonecrosis of the femoral head, with a slightly favorable postoperative evolution after surgery for one month. Surgical treatment was planned on the basis of clinical and paraclinical investigations and the joint damage. The hip was explored using an anterior approach under spinal anesthesia and standard antibiotic prophylaxis. After resection of the femoral head, meticulous debridement of all inflammatory tissues was performed, and a preformed temporary spacer was inserted into the femoral canal. Bacteriological laboratory studies identified Bacillus pumilus and Paenibacillus barengoltzii via matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis. The patient initially received nine days of empirical therapy with intravenous antibiotics (linezolid and meropenem). After the bacterial strains were identified, the patient received organism-specific antibiotic therapy with the same antibiotics and dose for eight days until discharge. After discharge, the patient was referred to another hospital, where he continued treatment with linezolid for seven weeks and, after that, four weeks of oral therapy with cotrimoxazole and rifampicin. During this period, no severe or potentially life-threatening adverse events were recorded during long-term treatment with linezolid or with the two oral antibiotics. In conclusion, our findings suggest that long-term treatment with linezolid may be a viable option for the management of bone and joint infections caused by Bacillus pumilus and Paenibacillus barengoltzii.

Repurposing Azoles to Resolve Serotogenic Toxicity Associated with Linezolid to Combat Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis

Serotogenic toxicity is a major hurdle associated with Linezolid in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) due to the inhibition of monoamine oxidase (MAO) enzymes. Azole compounds demonstrate structural similarities to the recognized anti-TB drug Linezolid, making them intriguing candidates for repurposing. Therefore, we have repurposed azoles (Posaconazole, Itraconazole, Miconazole, and Clotrimazole) for the treatment of drug-resistant TB with the anticipation of their selectivity in sparing the MAO enzyme. The results of repurposing revealed that Clotrimazole showed equipotent activity against the Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) H37Rv strain compared to Linezolid, with a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 2.26 μM. Additionally, Clotrimazole exhibited reasonable MIC50 values of 0.17 μM, 1.72 μM, 1.53 μM, and 5.07 μM against the inhA promoter+, katG+, rpoB+, and MDR clinical Mtb isolates, respectively, compared to Linezolid. Clotrimazole also exhibited 3.90-fold less inhibition of MAO-A and 50.35-fold less inhibition of MAO-B compared to Linezolid, suggesting a reduced serotonergic toxicity burden.

Tuberculosis patients with special clinical conditions treated with contezolid: three case reports and a literature review

Background

Contezolid is a novel oxazolidinone antibacterial agent, but there have been no reports of any pertinent clinical studies for the treatment of tuberculosis (TB). This was the first report of three TB patients who were successfully treated with contezolid.

Case presentation

Case 1 was TB complicated by myelosuppression syndrome. Case 2 was drug-resistant TB complicated by cirrhosis and anemia. Case 3 was drug-resistant TB complicated by liver transplantation that developed severe anemia after linezolid treatment. Following contezolid therapy, the three patients' symptoms improved significantly, and no adverse reactions were observed. The chest computed tomography (CT) examination also indicated that the therapeutic effect of this anti-TB regimen was as expected.

Conclusion

Contezolid showed good efficacy and fewer side effects in the treatment of TB. It may be a promising TB treatment.

Bedaquiline, Delamanid, Linezolid, Clofazimine, and Capreomycin MIC Distributions for Drug Resistance Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Shanghai, China

Background

New antituberculosis drugs have recently been approved for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis TB (MDR-TB). We aimed to describe the distributions of bedaquiline, delamanid, linezolid, clofazimine, and capreomycin MIC values for M. tuberculosis.

Methods

M. tuberculosis clinical isolates were originally isolated from 2020 to 2021 from 1452 different pulmonary tuberculosis patients of the Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital in China. The drug susceptibility testing was performed using the Sensititre custom plates (SHTBMY) (TREK Diagnostic Systems, Thermo Fisher Scientific In., USA) consisting of a 96-well microtitre plate containing 4 (bedaquiline, delamanid, clofazimine, capreomycin) antimicrobial agents. MICs were determined for linezolid using a microdilution method.

Results

Based on the latest definitions, 156 (10.74%) were MDR-TB, 93 (6.40%) were pre-XDR-TB, and 27 (1.86%) were XDR-TB. The rate of BDQ resistance in cases of MDR-TB was 7.69%, while it was observed to be 10.75% in cases of pre-XDR-TB, and significantly higher at 37.04% in cases of XDR-TB. The lowest rate of drug resistance against M. tuberculosis was DLM (0.14%). For LZD, 11 (0.76%) clinical isolates were resistant, based on the CLSI breakpoint of 1μg/mL. The five strains with a MIC value of >32 for LZD resistance were XDR-TB isolates. Among all MDR, pre-XDR, and XDR isolates tested, LZD' MIC50 increased from 0.25 and 0.5 to 1μg/mL. The MIC90 value of LZD against XDR-TB isolates was 32μg/mL. For CFZ, six isolates with elevated MICs of ≥2μg/mL. CFZ's MIC50 and MIC90 values in all isolates were 0.12μg/mL and 0.25μg/mL, respectively.

Conclusion

The study findings indicate that BDQ, DLM, CFZ, and LZD may exhibited excellent in vitro activity against MDR-TB isolates. Detection of resistance to BDQ and LZD was alarming for XDR-TB isolates. It is necessary to perform universal drug sensitivity testing for M. tuberculosis, especially MDR-TB and XDR-TB patients.

A bedaquiline, pyrazinamide, levofloxacin, linezolid, clofazimine second line regimen for tuberculosis displays similar early bactericidal activity as the standard rifampin based first line regimen

BACKGROUND

In 2018 the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended a switch to an all oral bedaquiline based second line regimen for treatment of drug resistant (DR) tuberculosis (TB). How these new second line regimens fare in comparison to first line regimens for treatment of drug sensitive (DS) tuberculosis is not well known.

METHODS

In this study, we contemporaneously enrolled subjects with DS (n = 31) and DR (n = 23) TB and assessed their response to therapy with first-line (rifampin, isoniazid, ethambutol, pyrazinamide) or second-line (bedaquiline, pyrazinamide, levofloxacin, linezolid, clofazimine) regimens, respectively.

RESULTS

We found that the early bactericidal activity of first and second line regimens was similar during the first two weeks of therapy as determined by BACTEC MGIT, colony forming units (CFU), and a liquid limiting dilution (LD) assays capable of detecting differentially detectable/culturable Mtb (DD Mtb). Further, an identical percentage (77.8%) of subjects from the DS and DR cohorts converted to culture negative after two months of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite presenting with more advanced disease at time of treatment, subjects with DR TB receiving an all oral bedaquiline based second line treatment regimen displayed a similar microbiological response to therapy as subjects with DS TB receiving a first-line treatment regimen.

Comparison of Adjuvant Clindamycin vs Linezolid for Severe Invasive Group A Streptococcus Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

Background

Linezolid may be an option for severe group A Streptococcus (GAS) infections based on its potent in vitro activity and antitoxin effects, but clinical data supporting its use over clindamycin are limited. This study evaluated treatment outcomes in patients with severe GAS skin and soft tissue infections who received either linezolid or clindamycin.

Methods

This retrospective single-center cohort study examined patients with GAS isolated from blood and/or tissue cultures with invasive soft tissue infection or necrotizing fasciitis who underwent surgical debridement and received linezolid or clindamycin for at least 48 hours. The primary outcome was percentage change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score from baseline through 72 hours of hospitalization.

Results

After adjustment for time to first surgical intervention among patients with a baseline SOFA score >0 (n = 23 per group), there was no difference in reduction of SOFA score over the first 72 hours in patients receiving clindamycin vs linezolid. In the entire cohort (n = 26, clindamycin; n = 29, linezolid), there was no difference in inpatient mortality (2% vs 1%) or any secondary outcomes, including duration of vasopressor therapy, intensive care unit length of stay, and antibiotic-associated adverse drug events.

Conclusions

There was no difference in reduction of critical illness as measured by SOFA score between baseline and 72 hours among patients treated with clindamycin vs linezolid. Given its more favorable side effect profile, linezolid may be a viable option for the treatment of serious GAS infections and should be further studied.

Designing molecular diagnostics for current tuberculosis drug regimens

Diagnostic development must occur in parallel with drug development to ensure the longevity of new treatment compounds. Despite an increasing number of novel and repurposed anti-tuberculosis compounds and regimens, there remains a large number of drugs for which no rapid and accurate molecular diagnostic option exists. The lack of rapid drug susceptibility testing for linezolid, bedaquiline, clofazimine, the nitroimidazoles (i.e pretomanid and delamanid) and pyrazinamide at any level of the healthcare system compromises the effectiveness of current tuberculosis and drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment regimens. In the context of current WHO tuberculosis treatment guidelines as well as promising new regimens, we identify the key diagnostic gaps for initial and follow-on tests to diagnose emerging drug resistance and aid in regimen selection. Additionally, we comment on potential gene targets for inclusion in rapid molecular drug susceptibility assays and sequencing assays for novel and repurposed drug compounds currently prioritized in current regimens, and evaluate the feasibility of mutation detection given the design of existing technologies. Based on current knowledge, we also propose design priorities for next generation molecular assays to support triage of tuberculosis patients to appropriate and effective treatment regimens. We encourage assay developers to prioritize development of these key molecular assays and support the continued evolution, uptake, and utility of sequencing to build knowledge of tuberculosis resistance mechanisms and further inform rapid treatment decisions in order to curb resistance to critical drugs in current regimens and achieve End TB targets.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05117788..

Understanding barriers, recommended solutions, and future prospects for the diagnosis and management of Pythium insidiosum keratitis

Pythium insidiosum keratitis (PIK) is a devastating corneal infection resulting in blindness in a large number of cases. Clinically and morphologically, it closely mimics fungal keratitis, and hence is also labeled as "parafungus." Although many clinical studies have documented evidence regarding the virulence of microorganism, and anatomical and functional outcomes, it remains a clinical challenge and diagnostic dilemma for most clinicians. Till today, PIK is being diagnosed and treated with certainty at only limited centers across the globe. But the question is why this is so? Taking this as the research question, this section on current ophthalmology aims to highlight the understanding of barriers to diagnosing and treating PIK, the suggestions to improve diagnosis and treatment, and the future prospects.

A rare case of hypertensive urgency caused by linezolid was reported: A case report

RATIONALE

Linezolid itself is rarely reported to cause blood pressure elevation, and it is rare to report that linezolid causes hypertensive urgency.

PATIENTS CONCERNS

This case report describes a 38-year-old man who developed acute hypertension after a postoperative foot infection that was treated with linezolid antitherapy. Hypertensive urgency occurred without obvious potential interaction between linezolid and drugs. After receiving appropriate treatment and stopping medication, the patient's blood pressure returned to normal and did not recur.

DIAGNOSES

Hypertensive crises occurred during the treatment of linezolid.

INTERVENTIONS

After stopping linezolid, the patient's blood pressure gradually returned to normal.

OUTCOMES

The patient's blood pressure returned to normal on the 26th day after stopping linezolid, and no abnormal blood pressure was found in the follow-up 2 months after discharge.

LESSONS

Linezolid is rarely reported to cause elevated blood pressure, even though it may occur in the absence of obvious drug interactions. Case reported fewer reasons may be for clinicians statistically insignificant or notice, and hypertensive urgency often lead to clinical risk, should be given enough attention to clinical. Pay attention to blood pressure monitoring during use, when there is abnormal increase in blood pressure, should consider adverse drug reactions, give timely discontinuation and give symptomatic treatment.

Antimicrobial Activity of Ceragenins against Vancomycin-Susceptible and -Resistant Enterococcus spp

Ceragenins (CSAs) are a new class of antimicrobial agents designed to mimic the activities of endogenous antimicrobial peptides. In this study, the antibacterial activities of various ceragenins (CSA-13, CSA-44, CSA-90, CSA-131, CSA-138, CSA-142, and CSA-192), linezolid, and daptomycin were assessed against 50 non-repeated Enterococcus spp. (17 of them vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus-VRE) isolated from various clinical specimens. Among the ceragenins evaluated, the MIC50 and MIC90 values of CSA-44 and CSA-192 were the lowest (2 and 4 μg/mL, respectively), and further studies were continued with these two ceragenins. Potential interactions between CSA-44 or CSA-192 and linezolid were tested and synergistic interactions were seen with the CSA-192-linezolid combination against three Enterococcus spp., one of them VRE. The effects of CSA-44 and CSA-192 on the MIC values of vancomycin were also investigated, and the largest MIC change was seen in the vancomycin-CSA-192 combination. The in vivo effects of CSA-44 and CSA-192 were evaluated in a Caenorhabditis elegans model system. Compared to no treatment, increased survival was observed with C. elegans when treated with ceragenins. In conclusion, CSA-44 and CSA-192 appear to be good candidates (alone or in combination) for the treatment of enterococcal infections, including those from VRE.

The Association of Serotonin Toxicity with Combination Linezolid-Serotonergic Agent Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Linezolid (LZD) has a longstanding reported association with the onset of serotonin toxicity (ST), secondary to drug-drug interactions with serotoninergic agents. There have been no conclusive data supporting the incidence or contributing risk factors to date. The study evaluated the incidence of ST in patients treated with LZD and serotonergic agents concomitantly versus LZD alone. The secondary objectives included a comparison of ST incidence in patients treated with one serotonergic agent + LZD versus two or more serotonergic agents + LZD. The studies used for this meta-analysis were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. All studies including a comparison between LZD alone and LZD + a serotonergic agent published between 1 January 2000 and 1 October 2023 and meeting the quality standards were considered for inclusion. Fourteen studies were identified, with five meeting all inclusion and exclusion criteria with no significant heterogeneity. For the analysis of LZD monotherapy vs. SA combination therapy, four studies with 6025 patients total were analyzed and yielded an odds ratio of 1.78 (CI [1.04, 3.02]; I2 = 49%; GRADE certainty: low). Four studies and 2501 patients were included in the analysis of one versus more than one SA with an odds ratio of 5.18 (CI [1.05, 25.49]; I2 = 44.87; GRADE certainty: moderate). The Newcastle-Ottawa score, visual inspection of the funnel plot, and Egger's statistic were used to evaluate quality and heterogeneity. The Peto method was used to calculate the summary odds ratios. All analyses were performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 3.0 and R, while GRADE was used to evaluate the quality of the final recommendation. The number of concomitant serotonergic agents may play a role in the development of serotonin toxicity in patients prescribed linezolid. In patients requiring linezolid therapy and serotonergic agents, risk versus benefit analysis should pay attention to the number of interacting drugs.

Cerebral Abscess Infected by Nocardia gipuzkoensis

Purpose

Nocardia gipuzkoensis is a novel species that solely identified in patients with pulmonary infections by far. Growing evidence showed the excellent performance of metagenomics next-generation sequencing (mNGS) on pathogenic identification, especially for new species. Here, we described the first case of an elderly female patient suddenly suffering from neurological disorders owing to N. gipuzkoensis infection. And linezolid could effectively treat N. gipuzkoensis infection.

Patients and Methods

The results of imaging, laboratory cultures, and mNGS, as well as therapeutic process are shared.

Results

An elderly female patient suddenly suffered from neurological disorders with dysphasia and right limb trembles under no obvious causes. Subsequently, she was diagnosed as intracranial space-occupying lesions by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The isolate from brain secretion was further identified as N. gipuzkoensis through mNGS. The targeted therapy with linezolid according to the antimicrobial susceptibility was used to treat cerebral abscess induced by N. gipuzkoensis. During the follow-up, no relapse was observed for the patient after surgery for 104 days.

Conclusion

Cerebral abscess induced by N. gipuzkoensis is rare disorder with high mortality. mNGS has been identified as a promising tool in pathogen diagnosis for timely therapy. Linezolid as one of the antimicrobial drugs could effectively treat N. gipuzkoensis infection and prevent adverse outcomes.

Derivation and Clinical Utility of Safety Targets for Linezolid-Related Adverse Events in Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment

Long-term usage of linezolid can result in adverse events such as peripheral neuropathy, anemia and thrombocytopenia. Therapeutic drug monitoring data from 75 drug-resistant tuberculosis patients treated with linezolid were analyzed using a time-to-event (TTE) approach for peripheral neuropathy and anemia and indirect response modelling for thrombocytopenia. Different time-varying linezolid pharmacokinetic exposure indices (AUC0-24h,ss, Cav, Cmax and Cmin) and patient characteristics were investigated as risk factors. A treatment duration shorter than 3 months was considered dropout and was modelled using a TTE approach. An exposure-response relationship between linezolid Cmin and both peripheral neuropathy and anemia was found. The exposure index which best described the development of thrombocytopenia was AUC0-24h. The final TTE dropout model indicated an association between linezolid Cmin and dropout. New safety targets for each adverse event were proposed which can be used for individualized linezolid dosing. According to the model predictions at 6 months of treatment, a Cmin of 0.11 mg/L and 1.4 mg/L should not be exceeded to keep the cumulative probability to develop anemia and peripheral neuropathy below 20%. The AUC0-24h should be below 111 h·mg/L or 270 h·mg/L to prevent thrombocytopenia and severe thrombocytopenia, respectively. A clinical utility assessment showed that the currently recommended dose of 600 mg once daily is safer compared to a 300 mg BID dosing strategy considering all four safety endpoints.

Evaluation of the impact of rifampicin on the plasma concentration of linezolid in tuberculosis co-infected patients

Linezolid combined with rifampicin has shown excellent clinical outcomes against infection by multi-resistant Gram-positive bacteria. However, several studies have indicated that rifampicin reduces the plasma concentration of linezolid in patients with severe infection. Linezolid has been recommended for the treatment of patients with multidrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. However, studies on the interaction between linezolid and rifampicin in patients suffering from tuberculosis with infection are lacking. We evaluated the interaction between linezolid and rifampicin based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). A retrospective analysis was undertaken for patients with tuberculosis and infection who were treated with linezolid and undergoing TDM. Patients were divided into the linezolid group and linezolid + rifampicin group. Data on demographic characteristics, disease, duration of linezolid therapy, and the plasma concentration of linezolid were used for statistical analyses. Eighty-eight patients with tuberculosis and infection were assessed. Values for the peak (Cmax) and trough (Cmin) concentrations of linezolid in plasma were available for 42 and 46 cases, respectively. Patients in the linezolid group had a significantly higher Cmax [15.76 (8.07-26.06) vs. 13.18 (7.48-23.64) mg/L, p = 0.048] and Cmin [8.38 (3.06-16.53) vs. 4.27 (0.45-10.47), p = 0.005] than those in the linezolid + rifampicin group. The plasma concentration of linezolid increased obviously in two patients after rifampicin discontinuation. However, the total efficiency and prevalence of hematologic adverse reactions were not significantly different in the linezolid group and linezolid + rifampin group. The plasma concentration of linezolid decreased upon combination with rifampicin, suggesting that TDM may aid avoidance of subtherapeutic levels of linezolid upon co-treatment with rifampicin.

Infective Endocarditis Caused by Corynebacterium striatum: Navigating Challenges and Treatment Strategies in an Emerging Threat

Corynebacterium striatum is a type of bacteria normally found in the environment and is considered a benign microbe on the human body surface. However, it can induce severe medical conditions, including bacteremia, infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and infections, in other organs. This case study focuses on a 56-year-old male patient with multiple comorbidities who presented with an ischemic stroke. Several days after the insertion of a right internal jugular line, the patient developed fever and tachycardia. Blood cultures revealed the presence of Corynebacterium striatum, a Gram-positive bacilli. Transesophageal echocardiography confirmed the diagnosis of complicated infective endocarditis (IE) with mitral valve vegetation and moderate mitral regurgitation. Prompt treatment with appropriate antibiotics, including linezolid and later vancomycin, led to the patient's improvement and eventual discharge in good condition. This case highlights the importance of early recognition, aggressive management, and accurate diagnosis in cases of IE caused by Corynebacterium striatum. Proper antibiotic selection is crucial, considering the emerging antibiotic resistance patterns associated with this pathogen. By addressing these aspects, patient outcomes can be improved, and potential complications such as IE can be prevented.

A Single-Run HPLC-MS Multiplex Assay for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Relevant First- and Second-Line Antibiotics in the Treatment of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis

The treatment of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis relies on complex antibiotic therapy. Inadequate antibiotic exposure can lead to treatment failure, acquired drug resistance, and an increased risk of adverse events. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can be used to optimize the antibiotic exposure. Therefore, we aimed to develop a single-run multiplex assay using high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) for TDM of patients with multidrug-resistant, pre-extensively drug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. A target profile for sufficient performance, based on the intended clinical application, was established and the assay was developed accordingly. Antibiotics were analyzed on a zwitterionic hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography column and a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer using stable isotope-labeled internal standards. The assay was sufficiently sensitive to monitor drug concentrations over five half-lives for rifampicin, rifabutin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, bedaquiline, linezolid, clofazimine, terizidone/cycloserine, ethambutol, delamanid, pyrazinamide, meropenem, prothionamide, and para-amino salicylic acid (PAS). Accuracy and precision were sufficient to support clinical decision making (≤±15% in clinical samples and ±20-25% in spiked samples, with 80% of future measured concentrations predicted to fall within ±40% of nominal concentrations). The method was applied in the TDM of two patients with complex drug-resistant tuberculosis. All relevant antibiotics from their regimens could be quantified and high-dose therapy was initiated, followed by microbiological conversion. In conclusion, we developed a multiplex assay that enables TDM of the relevant first- and second-line anti-tuberculosis medicines in a single run and was able to show its applicability in TDM of two drug-resistant tuberculosis patients.

Case report: Successful treatment with contezolid in a patient with tuberculous meningitis who was intolerant to linezolid

Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the most common form of central nervous system tuberculosis (TB) and the most severe form of extrapulmonary TB. It often presents with non-specific symptoms initially and has a high mortality and disability rate. With good central nervous system penetration, linezolid is recommended for treating drug-resistant, severe, or refractory tuberculous meningitis in China. Despite the benefits of linezolid on TBM treatment, the adverse effects of long-term therapy, such as myelosuppression, peripheral neuritis, and optic neuritis, are notable and can be severe and even life-threatening, leading to discontinuation and compromising treatment expectations. Contezolid is a novel oxazolidinone antibacterial agent approved by the National Medical Products Administration of China in 2021, which has a more favorable safety profile than linezolid in terms of myelosuppression and monoamine oxidase inhibition. Here we first report a case of TBM in a patient who was intolerant to antituberculosis treatment with linezolid and achieved good efficacy and safety results after the compassionate use of contezolid. Given the widespread use of linezolid in TB treatment and the potential risks for long-term use, multi-center prospective controlled clinical trials in TB and TBM patients are needed to investigate the appropriate use of contezolid further.

Antibiotic Myths for the Infectious Diseases Clinician

Antimicrobials are commonly prescribed and often misunderstood. With more than 50% of hospitalized patients receiving an antimicrobial agent at any point in time, judicious and optimal use of these drugs is paramount to advancing patient care. This narrative will focus on myths relevant to nuanced consultation from infectious diseases specialists, particularly surrounding specific considerations for a variety of antibiotics.

Implementation of Bedaquiline, Pretomanid, and Linezolid in the United States: Experience Using a Novel All-Oral Treatment Regimen for Treatment of Rifampin-Resistant or Rifampin-Intolerant Tuberculosis Disease

BACKGROUND

Rifampin-resistant tuberculosis is a leading cause of morbidity worldwide; only one-third of persons start treatment, and outcomes are often inadequate. Several trials demonstrate 90% efficacy using an all-oral, 6-month regimen of bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid (BPaL), but significant toxicity occurred using 1200-mg linezolid. After US Food and Drug Administration approval in 2019, some US clinicians rapidly implemented BPaL using an initial 600-mg linezolid dose adjusted by serum drug concentrations and clinical monitoring.

METHODS

Data from US patients treated with BPaL between 14 October 2019 and 30 April 2022 were compiled and analyzed by the BPaL Implementation Group (BIG), including baseline examination and laboratory, electrocardiographic, and clinical monitoring throughout treatment and follow-up. Linezolid dosing and clinical management was provider driven, and most patients had linezolid adjusted by therapeutic drug monitoring.

RESULTS

Of 70 patients starting BPaL, 2 changed to rifampin-based therapy, 68 (97.1%) completed BPaL, and 2 of the 68 (2.9%) experienced relapse after completion. Using an initial 600-mg linezolid dose daily adjusted by therapeutic drug monitoring and careful clinical and laboratory monitoring for adverse effects, supportive care, and expert consultation throughout BPaL treatment, 3 patients (4.4%) with hematologic toxicity and 4 (5.9%) with neurotoxicity required a change in linezolid dose or frequency. The median BPaL duration was 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

BPaL has transformed treatment for rifampin-resistant or intolerant tuberculosis. In this cohort, effective treatment required less than half the duration recommended in 2019 US guidelines for drug-resistant tuberculosis. Use of individualized linezolid dosing and monitoring likely enhanced safety and treatment completion. The BIG cohort demonstrates that early implementation of new tuberculosis treatments in the United States is feasible.

Clinical Utility of Contezolid-Containing Regimens in 25 Cases of Linezolid-Intolerable Tuberculosis Patients

Objective

Linezolid is increasingly used in the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) M. tuberculosis (TB) with good efficacy; however, its clinical use is limited by intolerable adverse events (AEs). This usually results in dose adjustment or even discontinuation. Contezolid is a new oxazolidinone antibiotic with in vitro antibacterial activity against MDR TB equivalent to linezolid, but its safety and efficacy in MDB TB treatment has not been established.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study on 25 TB patients who received both linezolid and contezolid in Beijing Chest Hospital from January 1, 2022, to January 31, 2023. All patients received linezolid-containing anti-TB regimen first and then switched to contezolid-containing regimens due to the intolerable linezolid-related AEs.

Results

Most (68%, 17/25) of the patients were diagnosed with RR-TB or MDR-TB. A total of 30 AEs were reported in these patients. About 26.7% (8/30) of the AEs were Grade 3 (severe) in severity. After switching to contezolid-containing anti-TB regimens for at least 1 month, the linezolid-related AEs were resolved or improved in 90% of the cases. Clinical improvement was observed in all patients after treatment with contezolid-containing regimen, with negative results of sputum culture and/or smear for M. tuberculosis in 84% of the patients.

Conclusion

Contezolid can be the first choice instead of linezolid to combine with other anti-TB drugs if necessary. Well-designed clinical trials are required to further confirm the safety and efficacy of contezolid in the treatment of TB patients.

Parallel evolution of linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in patients with cystic fibrosis

Linezolid is an antibiotic used to treat serious Staphylococcus aureus infections. Resistance to linezolid is considered rare but could emerge with repeated dosing. We recently reported widespread prescription of linezolid for a cohort of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). The goals of this study were to determine the incidence of linezolid-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in CF and identify molecular mechanisms for linezolid resistance. We identified patients who cultured S. aureus resistant to linezolid with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) >4 at the University of Iowa CF Center between 2008 and 2018. We obtained isolates from these patients and retested susceptibility to linezolid using broth microdilution. We used whole genome sequencing to perform phylogenetic analysis of linezolid-resistant isolates and examine sequences for mutations or accessory genes that confer linezolid resistance. Between 2008 and 2018, 111 patients received linezolid, and 4 of these patients cultured linezolid-resistant S. aureus. We sequenced 11 resistant and 21 susceptible isolates from these 4 subjects. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that linezolid resistance developed in ST5 or ST105 backgrounds. Three individuals had linezolid-resistant S. aureus with a G2576T mutation in 23S rRNA. One of these subjects additionally had a mutS- mutL- hypermutating S. aureus that produced five resistant isolates with multiple ribosomal subunit mutations. In one subject, the genetic basis for linezolid resistance was unclear. We conclude that linezolid resistant S. aureus can occur through multiple genetic mechanisms in patients with repeated exposure to this antibiotic. IMPORTANCE Patients with cystic fibrosis have persistent lung infections with Staphylococcus aureus that require extensive antibiotic treatments. Linezolid, an antibiotic given by oral or intravenous route, is prescribed repeatedly for patients whose lung disease has progressed. After treatment with linezolid, S. aureus strains can evolve antibiotic resistance through multiple genetic mechanisms. In addition to a common mutation in the 23S ribosomal RNA known to confer linezolid resistance, S. aureus strains can evolve novel resistance based on a combination of mutations affecting the bacterial ribosome. This combination of mutations was observed in a strain that exhibited hypermutation owing to the loss of the DNA repair genes mutS and mutL. In this cohort of patients with cystic fibrosis, linezolid resistance was transient, possibly due to the growth disadvantage of resistant strains. However, ongoing chronic exposure to linezolid may create optimal conditions for the future emergence of resistance to this critical antibiotic.

Effect of Platelet Parameters on Linezolid-Related Thrombocytopenia in Hospitalized Patients

Background

Linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia incidence varies considerably. Linezolid-related thrombocytopenia in patients has received few studies which have investigated risk factors including platelet parameters except for platelet counts. The study aims to analyze the effect of platelet parameters, including mean platelet volume and platelet large cell ratio, on linezolid-related thrombocytopenia in patients.

Methods

The effect of platelet parameters on linezolid-related thrombocytopenia was identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regressions. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was carried out to compare the survival of patients who developed linezolid-related thrombocytopenia with patients who did not.

Results

Thrombocytopenia occurred at a rate of 41.5% (66/159) after linezolid therapy in hospitalized patients. Platelet parameters, including the difference in mean platelet volume (MPV/fL=0.08 (-1.2-0.9)vs-0.5 (-1.5-0.3), (OR, 0.459; P = 0.001), the difference in platelet large cell ratio (PLCR/fL=0.9 (-5.1-6.2)vs-3.8 (-8.6-2.4), (OR, 1.156; P = 0.001), baseline platelet counts (OR, 0.995; P = 0.006) and duration of linezolid therapy≥10d (OR, 1.346; P = 0.007), were significantly associated with linezolid-related thrombocytopenia in hospitalized patients. In addition, other risk factors which also are associated with linezolid-related thrombocytopenia include baseline red blood cells, co-medication with parecoxib and co-medication with caspofungin. Accumulated in-hospital mortality of patients with thrombocytopenia was significantly higher than that of patients without thrombocytopenia during linezolid treatment (19.7% vs 8.6%, P = 0.003).

Conclusion

The difference in mean platelet volume, the difference in large platelet ratio, baseline platelet counts and duration of linezolid therapy≥10d significantly affected the development of linezolid-related thrombocytopenia in hospitalized patients.

The Properties of Linezolid, Rifampicin, and Vancomycin, as Well as the Mechanism of Action of Pentamidine, Determine Their Synergy against Gram-Negative Bacteria

Combining pentamidine with Gram-positive-targeting antibiotics has been proven to be a promising strategy for treating infections from Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). However, which antibiotics pentamidine can and cannot synergize with and the reasons for the differences are unclear. This study aimed to identify the possible mechanisms for the differences in the synergy of pentamidine with rifampicin, linezolid, tetracycline, erythromycin, and vancomycin against GNB. Checkerboard assays were used to detect the synergy of pentamidine and the different antibiotics. To determine the mechanism of pentamidine, fluorescent labeling assays were used to measure membrane permeability, membrane potential, efflux pump activity, and reactive oxygen species (ROS); the LPS neutralization assay was used to evaluate the target site; and quantitative PCR was used to measure changes in efflux pump gene expression. Our results revealed that pentamidine strongly synergized with rifampicin, linezolid, and tetracycline and moderately synergized with erythromycin, but did not synergize with vancomycin against E. coli, K. pneumoniae, E. cloacae, and A. baumannii. Pentamidine increased the outer membrane permeability but did not demolish the outer and inner membranes, which exclusively permits the passage of hydrophobic, small-molecule antibiotics while hindering the entry of hydrophilic, large-molecule vancomycin. It dissipated the membrane proton motive force and inactivated the efflux pump, allowing the intracellular accumulation of antimicrobials that function as substrates of the efflux pump, such as linezolid. These processes resulted in metabolic perturbation and ROS production which ultimately was able to destroy the bacteria. These mechanisms of action of pentamidine on GNB indicate that it is prone to potentiating hydrophobic, small-molecule antibiotics, such as rifampicin, linezolid, and tetracycline, but not hydrophilic, large-molecule antibiotics like vancomycin against GNB. Collectively, our results highlight the importance of the physicochemical properties of antibiotics and the specific mechanisms of action of pentamidine for the synergy of pentamidine-antibiotic combinations. Pentamidine engages in various pathways in its interactions with GNB, but these mechanisms determine its specific synergistic effects with certain antibiotics against GNB. Pentamidine is a promising adjuvant, and we can optimize drug compatibility by considering its functional mechanisms.

A cost minimisation analysis comparing oral linezolid and intravenous daptomycin administered via an outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy programme in patients requiring prolonged antibiotic courses

This study is an economic analysis seeking to examine cost savings that may be accrued from usage of oral linezolid in place of OPAT IV daptomycin in patients requiring prolonged courses of IV or highly bioavailable oral antibiotic therapy. In order to do so we conducted a literature review to establish the scenarios in which the agents could be considered equivalent. We then, using a decision-tree model, conducted a cost analysis to establish differences in cost between the approaches. Under the model base-case, the total cost of treatment with OPAT daptomycin was €3,496.84 and the total cost of treatment with oral linezolid was €772.01. Therefore the oral linezolid strategy would be projected to save the Irish health service €2,724.83 per patient. These results were robust to one-way deterministic sensitivity analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Our study suggests that significant savings could be safely accrued in the management of these patients.

Comparative Study of Linezolid and Vancomycin Regimens in One-Stage Surgery for Treating Limb Traumatic Osteomyelitis Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

To compare the clinical outcomes of linezolid and vancomycin regimens combined with one-stage surgery in treating traumatic osteomyelitis of the limbs caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. A retrospective study was performed to analyze patients with traumatic osteomyelitis of the limbs attributable to MRSA infection. All of these patients received one-stage surgery to debride their wounds, with subsequent implantation of a vancomycin-loaded calcium sulfate artificial bone. Patients received either intravenous linezolid (study group) or vancomycin (control group) during the perioperative period. The postoperative inflammatory markers, renal function, duration of drainage catheter placement, duration of antibiotic administration, length of hospital stay, adverse events, and recurrence of osteomyelitis in these two groups were compared. The study group had a shorter duration of antibiotic administration and length of hospital stay (p < 0.05). There was a significant difference in the incidences of adverse events between the two groups (5.88% and 17.65% in the study and control groups, respectively, p < 0.05). There was no recurrence in either group during the three-year follow-up period. As of year, five after the surgery, one patient in the control group had a recurrence of osteomyelitis. The linezolid regimen should be preferred to the vancomycin regimen in patients with traumatic osteomyelitis of the extremities caused by MRSA infection because the linezolid regimen showed fewer adverse events, shorter periods of antibiotic use, and shorter hospital stay. However, both treatment regimens achieved satisfactory outcomes and warranted further investigations.