Randomized phase II trial of cyclophosphamide and the oral poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor veliparib in patients with recurrent, advanced triple-negative breast cancer

Efficacy and safety of veliparib in the treatment of advanced/metastatic breast cancer: a meta-analysis of phase II and III randomized controlled trials

We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of veliparib in the treatment of advanced/metastatic breast cancer. Databases were searched for relevant studies till June 2023. Six RCTs involving 1912 patients were included. The pooled analysis provided evidence that veliparib-containing regimens could significantly improve the PFS (HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.61-0.83; p < 0.0001), OS (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.76-0.99; p = 0.03), and ORR (RR: 1.52; 95% CI:1.06-2.18; p = 0.02) than those of controls for treating advanced/metastatic breast cancer. Breast cancer patients with BRCA-mutation tended to have a better PFS than the BRCA-wildtype group, and patients with TNBC tended to associated with a longer PFS than the non-TNBC group. Veliparib could significantly increase the risk of anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, diarrhea, stomatitis, fatigue, and peripheral neuropathy. Anemia and neutropenia should be well concerned. The veliparib-containing regimen was efficacious in treating advanced/metastatic breast cancer with a controllable safety factor.

DNA damage response in breast cancer and its significant role in guiding novel precise therapies

DNA damage response (DDR) deficiency has been one of the emerging targets in treating breast cancer in recent years. On the one hand, DDR coordinates cell cycle and signal transduction, whose dysfunction may lead to cell apoptosis, genomic instability, and tumor development. Conversely, DDR deficiency is an intrinsic feature of tumors that underlies their response to treatments that inflict DNA damage. In this review, we systematically explore various mechanisms of DDR, the rationale and research advances in DDR-targeted drugs in breast cancer, and discuss the challenges in its clinical applications. Notably, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety in breast cancer with high homogenous recombination deficiency (HRD) status in a series of clinical trials. Moreover, several studies on novel DDR-related molecules are actively exploring to target tumors that become resistant to PARP inhibition. Before further clinical application of new regimens or drugs, novel and standardized biomarkers are needed to develop for accurately characterizing the benefit population and predicting efficacy. Despite the promising efficacy of DDR-related treatments, challenges of off-target toxicity and drug resistance need to be addressed. Strategies to overcome drug resistance await further exploration on DDR mechanisms, and combined targeted drugs or immunotherapy will hopefully provide more precise or combined strategies and expand potential responsive populations.

Small Molecule Therapeutics in the Pipeline Targeting for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Origin, Challenges, Opportunities, and Mechanisms of Action

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells are devoid of estrogen receptors (ERs), progesterone receptor (PRs), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and it (TNBC) counts for about 10-15% of all breast cancers. TNBC is highly invasive, having a faster growth rate and a higher risk of metastasis and recurrence. Still, chemotherapy is one of the widely used options for treating TNBC. This study reviewed the histological and molecular characterization of TNBC subtypes, signaling pathways that are aberrantly expressed, and small molecules targeting these pathways, as either single agents or in combination with other therapeutic agents like chemotherapeutics, immunotherapeutics, and antibody-drug conjugates; their mechanisms of action, challenges, and future perspectives were also reviewed. A detailed analytical review was carried out using the literature collected from the SciFinder, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, ACS, Springer, and Wiley databases. Several small molecule inhibitors were found to be therapeutics for treating TNBC. The mechanism of action and the different signaling pathways through which the small molecules exert their effects were studied, including clinical trials, if reported. These small molecule inhibitors include buparlisib, everolimus, vandetanib, apatinib, olaparib, salidroside, etc. Some of the signaling pathways involved in TNBC, including the VEGF, PARP, STAT3, MAPK, EGFR, P13K, and SRC pathways, were discussed. Due to the absence of these biomarkers, drug development for treating TNBC is challenging, with chemotherapy being the main therapeutic agent. However, chemotherapy is associated with chemoresistance and a high toxicity to healthy cells as side effects. Hence, there is a continuous demand for small-molecule inhibitors that specifically target several signaling pathways that are abnormally expressed in TNBC. We attempted to include all the recent developments in this field. Any omission is truly unintentional.

Veliparib‑Induced Toxicity in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta‑Analysis

In this study, we investigate the veliparib‑induced toxicity in cancer patients. Databases were searched for RCTs treated with veliparib. We found veliparib could increase the risk of hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities. Anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and nausea were the most common toxicities. Patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal tumors tend to have a higher risk of high-grade neutropenia; patients in the first-line setting tend to have a higher risk of high-grade anemia and neutropenia than those in the ≥ second line setting. Patients receiving higher dosage of veliparib tend to have a higher risk of all-grade anemia. Veliparib could also increase the risk of insomnia, myalgia, pneumonia, dyspnea, hyponatremia, and fatigue.

Small molecule agents for triple negative breast cancer: Current status and future prospects

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer with poor prognosis. The number of cases increased by 2.26 million in 2020, making it the most commonly diagnosed cancer type in the world. TNBCs lack hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2), which limits treatment options. Currently, paclitaxel-based drugs combined with other chemotherapeutics remain the main treatment for TNBC. There is currently no consensus on the best therapeutic regimen for TNBC. However, there have been successful clinical trials exploring large-molecule monoclonal antibodies, small-molecule targeted drugs, and novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC). Although monoclonal antibodies have produced clinical success, their large molecular weight can limit therapeutic benefits. It is worth noting that in the past 30 years, the FDA has approved small molecule drugs for HER2-positive breast cancers. The lack of effective targets and the occurrence of drug resistance pose significant challenges in the treatment of TNBC. To improve the prognosis of TNBC, it is crucial to search for effective targets and to overcome drug resistance. This review examines the clinical efficacy, adverse effects, resistance mechanisms, and potential solutions of targeted small molecule drugs in both monotherapies and combination therapies. New therapeutic targets, including nuclear export protein 1 (XPO1) and hedgehog (Hh), are emerging as potential options for researchers and become integrated into clinical trials for TNBC. Additionally, there is growing interest in the potential of targeted protein degradation chimeras (PROTACs), degraders of rogue proteins, as a future therapy direction. This review provides potentially valuable insights with clinical implications.

Cardioprotective Effects of PARP Inhibitors: A Re-Analysis of a Meta-Analysis and a Real-Word Data Analysis Using the FAERS Database

Objective: This study aimed to assess the potential of PARP inhibitors to prevent cardiotoxicity. Methods: First, a re-analysis and update of a previously published study was conducted. Additional searches were conducted of the PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases on 2 June 2023. After the selection process, the pooled odds ratio (OR) for cardiac adverse events (AEs) was calculated. Second, the FAERS database was examined for 10 frequently co-administered anticancer agents. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was calculated based on the occurrence of cardiac AEs depending on the co-administration of PARP inhibitors. Results: Seven studies were selected for the meta-analysis. Although not statistically significant, co-administration of PARP inhibitors with chemotherapy/bevacizumab decreased the risk of cardiac AEs (Peto OR = 0.61; p = 0.36), while co-administration with antiandrogens increased the risk of cardiac AEs (Peto OR = 1.83; p = 0.18). A total of 19 cases of cardiac AEs were reported with co-administration of PARP inhibitors in the FAERS database. Co-administration of PARP inhibitors with chemotherapy/bevacizumab significantly decreased the risk of cardiac AEs (ROR = 0.352; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.194-0.637). On the other hand, for antiandrogens co-administered with PARP inhibitors, the ROR was 3.496 (95% CI, 1.539-7.942). The ROR for immune checkpoint inhibitors co-administered with PARP inhibitors was 0.606 (95% CI, 0.151-2.432), indicating a non-significant effect on cardiac AEs. Conclusion: This study reports that PARP inhibitors show cardioprotective effects when used with conventional anticancer agents.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in the treatment landscape of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)

OBJECTIVE

Chemotherapy is the mainstay for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. Over the years, the use of chemotherapy for these patients has demonstrated many adversities, including toxicity and resistance, which suggested the need to develop novel alternative therapeutic options, such as poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). Herein, we provide an overview on PARPi, mechanisms of action and the role of biomarkers in PARPi sensitivity trials, clinical advances in PARPi therapy for TNBC patients based on the most recent studies and findings of clinical trials, and challenges that prevent PARP inhibitors from achieving high efficacy such as resistance and overlapping toxicities with other chemotherapies.

DATA SOURCES

Searching for relevant articles was done using PubMed and Cochrane Library databases by using the keywords including TNBC; chemotherapy; PARPi; BRCA; homologous recombination repair (HRR). Studies had to be published in full-text in English in order to be considered.

DATA SUMMARY

Although PARPi have been used in the treatment of local/metastatic breast malignancies that are HER2 negative and has a germline BRCA mutation, several questions are still to be answered in order to maximize the clinical benefit of PARP inhibitors in TNBC treatment, such as questions related to the optimal use in the neoadjuvant and metastatic settings as well as the best combinations with various chemotherapies.

CONCLUSIONS

PARPi are emerging treatment options for patients with gBRCA1/2 mutations. Determining patients that are most likely to benefit from PARPi and identifying the optimal treatment combinations with high efficacy and fewer side effects are currently ongoing.

Major adverse cardiac events and cardiovascular toxicity with PARP inhibitors-based therapy for solid tumors: a systematic review and safety meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) provided significant antitumor activity in various tumors, mainly carrying deleterious mutations of BRCA1/BRCA2 genes. Only few data are available regarding the cardiac and vascular safety profile of this drug class. We carried out a meta-analysis for assessing the incidence and relative risk (RR) of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), hypertension, and thromboembolic events in patients with solid tumors treated with PARPi-based therapy.

METHODS

Prospective studies were identified by searching the Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ASCO Meeting abstracts. Data extraction was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Combined odds ratios (ORs), RRs, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects methods, depending on studies heterogeneity. RevMan software for meta-analysis (v.5.2.3) was used to carry out statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies were selected for the final analysis. The incidence of PARPi-related MACEs of any and high grade was 5.0% and 0.9%, respectively, compared with 3.6% and 0.9% in the control arms, corresponding to a significant increased risk of MACEs of any grade (Peto OR 1.62; P = 0.0009) but not of high grade (P = 0.49). The incidence of hypertension of any grade and high grade was 17.5% and 6.0% with PARPi, respectively, compared with 12.6% and 4.4% in the controls. Treatment with PARPi significantly increased the risk of hypertension of any grade (random-effects, RR = 1.53; P = 0.03) but not of high grade (random-effects, RR = 1.47; P = 0.09) compared with controls. Finally, PARPi-based therapies significantly increased the risk of thromboembolic events of any grade (Peto OR = 1.49, P = 0.004) and not of high grade (Peto OR = 1.31; P = 0.13) compared with controls.

CONCLUSIONS

PARPi-based therapy is associated with a significantly increased risk of MACEs, hypertension, and thromboembolic events of any grade compared with controls. The lack of a significant increased risk of high-grade events together with the absolute low incidence of these adverse events led not to consider routine cardiovascular monitoring as recommended in asymptomatic patients.

PARP inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy is the standard treatment for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Whether the addition of PARP inhibitors improves treatment efficacy remains controversial clinically. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of combination treatment (PC) and chemotherapy alone (CA).

METHODS

Relevant studies were identified through searches of 7 databases. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

We screened 317 studies and included seven RCTs involving 2091 patients in the final analysis. PC tended to have better efficacy than CA according to PFS (HR [hazard ratio]: 0.83 [0.75, 0.93], p = 0.001), OS (HR: 0.89 [0.76,1.03], p = 0.11) and overall response rate (ORR) (RR [risk ratio]: 1.19 [0.97,1.46], p = 0.10). However, grade 3-5 AEs (RR: 1.50 [0.87,2.61], p = 0.15) were observed in the PC group. In the PC arm, the 10 most-reported grade 3-5 AEs were neutropenia (62.8%), anemia (28.5%), thrombocytopenia (26.4%), lymphopenia (19.05%), leukopenia (16.9%), fatigue (5%), heart failure (4.76%), lung infection (4.76%), thromboembolic events (4.76%) and ventricular tachycardia (4.76%). Similar results for pathological complete response (pCR), total AEs, rate of complete response (CR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD), breast conservation rate (BCR), and drug discontinuation (DD) rate were found between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For TNBC treatment, the combination of PARP inhibitors and chemotherapy appears to be superior to chemotherapy alone with better antitumor efficacy. However, its higher rate of AEs needs to be taken seriously. More high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm these results.

Efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors in the treatment of BRCA-mutated breast cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) have emerged as a new class of therapeutic agents for breast cancer patients with breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutations. However, the efficacy and toxicity of PARPis have not been clearly established.

METHODS

This study comprehensively evaluated the efficacy and safety of PARPis in patients with BRCA-mutated breast cancer. Online databases were systematically searched, and six clinical trials were included. The primary endpoint of efficacy was progression-free survival (PFS), whereas the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR). Additionally, we assessed the safety of PARPis.

RESULTS

The results of the meta-analysis showed that PARPis can effectively improve the PFS and OS in patients compared with the control group. The pooled HR (PARPi vs control groups) was 0.63 (95% CI, 0.55 - 0.73) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.73 to -0.95) for PFS and OS, respectively. In safety, PARPis demonstrated controllable adverse reactions. There were no significant differences in overall AEs or grade ≥3 AEs between the PARP inhibitor and control arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm the efficacy and safety of PARPis in patients with BRCA-mutated breast cancer, and more specifically clarify the efficacy of PARPis alone or in combination with other chemotherapy drugs. [Figure: see text].

Combining Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase (PARP) Inhibitors with Chemotherapeutic Agents: Promise and Challenges

Better understanding of molecular drivers and dysregulated pathways has furthered the concept of precision oncology and rational drug development. The role of DNA damage response (DDR) pathways has been extensively studied in carcinogenesis and as potential therapeutic targets to improve response to chemotherapy or overcome resistance. Treatment with small molecule inhibitors of PARP has resulted in clinical response and conferred survival benefit to patients with ovarian cancer, BRCA-mutant breast cancer, HRD-deficient prostate cancer and BRCA-mutant pancreatic cancer, leading to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals. However, the observed clinical benefit with single agent PARP inhibitors is limited to few tumor types within the relevant genetic context. Since DDR pathways are essential for repair of damage caused by cytotoxic agents, PARP inhibitors have been evaluated in combination with various chemotherapeutic agents to broaden the therapeutic application of this class of drugs. In this chapter, we discuss the combination of PARP inhibitors with different chemotherapeutics agents, clinical experience to date, lessons learnt, and future directions for this approach.

The triple negative breast cancer drugs graveyard: a review of failed clinical trials 2017-2022

INTRODUCTION

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 15-20% of breast cancers (BC) and has the worst prognosis. It is characterized by the absence of both hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). TNBC has more limited therapeutic options compared to other subtypes, meaning that there is still a long way to go to discover target treatments.

AREAS COVERED

Our review aims to summarize phase II/III clinical trials enrolling patients with TNBC that have been published between 2017 and 2022 but failed to reach their primary endpoint. We here try to emphasize the limitations and weaknesses noted in negative studies and to point out unexpected results which might be useful to enhance the therapeutic approach to TNBC disease.

EXPERT OPINION

A deeper understanding of the mechanisms behind TNBC heterogeneity allowed to enhance the knowledge of new prognostic and predictive biomarkers of response. However, it is also through several failed clinical trials that we were able to define new therapeutic approaches which improved TNBC patients' clinical outcomes. Nowadays, we still need to overcome several difficulties to fully recognize different intracellular and extracellular pathways that crosstalk in TNBC and the mechanisms of resistance to identify novel tailored-patients' therapies.

Current Research Status of Metronomic Chemotherapy in Combination Treatment of Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Metronomic chemotherapy (MCT), termed sustained low-dose administration with minimal toxicity, is a new modality of conventional chemotherapy, a verified therapy alternative, and has acquired significant recognition and interest in oncology. Numerous clinical trials of MCT in combination with other treatments, including targeted therapies, biologics, and endocrine therapy, are in progress to obtain better results.

SUMMARY

We comprehensively described the clinical benefits of MCT in combination with other treatments in different molecular subtypes of breast cancer and assessed the feasibility of its adoption in varying phases of treatment. Due to the promising preclinical and clinical investigations, it is expected that MCT in combination with other treatments will enhance the advantages of this strategy and apply it to clinical practice.

KEY MESSAGE

MCT, in combination with other therapeutic interventions, will fully exploit the benefits of this strategy, ushering in a new paradigm in oncology treatment and driving the transformation of cancer into a more manageable chronic disease using newly developed treatment approaches.

Metronomic Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer Treatment: Clinical and Preclinical Data between Lights and Shadows

Metronomic chemotherapy (mCHT), defined as continuous administration of low-dose chemotherapeutic agents with no or short regular treatment-free intervals, was first introduced to the clinic in international guidelines in 2017, and, since then, has become one of the available strategies for the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC). Despite recent successes, many unsolved practical and theoretical issues remain to be addressed. The present review aims to identify the "lights and shadows" of mCHT in preclinical and clinical settings. In the preclinical setting, several findings indicate that one of the most noticeable effects of mCHT is on the tumor microenvironment, which, over the last twenty years, has been demonstrated to be pivotal in supporting tumor cell survival and proliferation. On the other hand, the direct effects on tumor cells have been less well-defined. In addition, critical items to be addressed are the lack of definition of an optimal biological dose (OBD), the method of administration of metronomic schedules, and the recognition and validation of predictive biomarkers. In the clinical context-where mCHT has mainly been used in a metastatic setting-low toxicity is the most well-recognised light of mCHT, whereas the type of study design, the absence of randomised trials and uncertainty in terms of doses and drugs remain among the shadows. In conclusion, growing evidence indicates that mCHT is a suitable treatment option for selected metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Moreover, given its multimodal mechanisms of action, its addition to immunological and targeted therapies might represent a promising new approach to the treatment of MBC. More preclinical data are needed in this regard, which can only be obtained through support for translational research as the key link between basic science and patient care.

Heterogeneity of triple-negative breast cancer: understanding the Daedalian labyrinth and how it could reveal new drug targets

INTRODUCTION

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is considered the most aggressive breast cancer subtype with the least favorable outcomes. However, recent research efforts have generated an enhanced knowledge of the biology of the disease and have provided a new, more comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted ecosystem that underpins TNBC.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors illustrate the principal biological characteristics of TNBC, the molecular driver alterations, targetable genes, and the biomarkers of immune engagement that have been identified across the subgroups of TNBC. Accordingly, the authors summarize the landscape of the innovative and investigative biomarker-driven therapeutic options in TNBC that emerge from the unique biological basis of the disease.

EXPERT OPINION

The therapeutic setting of TNBC is rapidly evolving. An enriched understanding of the tumor spatial and temporal heterogeneity and the surrounding microenvironment of this complex disease can effectively support the development of novel and tailored opportunities of treatment.

Medulloblastoma and the DNA Damage Response

Medulloblastoma (MB) is the most common malignant brain tumor in children with standard of care consisting of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Recent molecular profiling led to the identification of four molecularly distinct MB subgroups – Wingless (WNT), Sonic Hedgehog (SHH), Group 3, and Group 4. Despite genomic MB characterization and subsequent tumor stratification, clinical treatment paradigms are still largely driven by histology, degree of surgical resection, and presence or absence of metastasis rather than molecular profile. Patients usually undergo resection of their tumor followed by craniospinal radiation (CSI) and a 6 month to one-year multi-agent chemotherapeutic regimen. While there is clearly a need for development of targeted agents specific to the molecular alterations of each patient, targeting proteins responsible for DNA damage repair could have a broader impact regardless of molecular subgrouping. DNA damage response (DDR) protein inhibitors have recently emerged as targeted agents with potent activity as monotherapy or in combination in different cancers. Here we discuss the molecular underpinnings of genomic instability in MB and potential avenues for exploitation through DNA damage response inhibition.

Metronomic Chemotherapy for Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Literature Review

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is the ultimately lethal form of prostate cancer. Docetaxel chemotherapy was the first life-prolonging treatment for mCRPC; however, the standard maximally tolerated dose (MTD) docetaxel regimen is often not considered for patients with mCRPC who are older and/or frail due to its toxicity. Low-dose metronomic chemotherapy (LDMC) is the frequent administration of typically oral and off-patent chemotherapeutics at low doses, which is associated with a superior safety profile and higher tolerability than MTD chemotherapy. We conducted a systematic literature review using the PUBMED, EMBASE, and MEDLINE electronic databases to identify clinical studies that examined the impact of LDMC on patients with advanced prostate cancer. The search identified 30 reports that retrospectively or prospectively investigated LDMC, 29 of which focused on mCRPC. Cyclophosphamide was the most commonly used agent integrated into 27/30 (90%) of LDMC regimens. LDMC resulted in a clinical benefit rate of 56.8 ± 24.5% across all studies. Overall, there were only a few non-hematological grade 3 or 4 adverse events reported. As such, LDMC is a well-tolerated treatment option for patients with mCRPC, including those who are older and frail. Furthermore, LDMC is considered more affordable than conventional mCRPC therapies. However, prospective phase III trials are needed to further characterize the efficacy and safety of LDMC in mCRPC before its use in practice.

Associations with response to Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in patients with metastatic breast cancer

PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have modest antitumor activity in patients with advanced breast cancer and mutation in BRCA. It is unclear whether some subgroups derive greater benefit from treatment. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from inception to March 2021 to identify trials of PARPi in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Objective response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) to PARPi were extracted and pooled in a meta-analysis using the Mantel Haenszel random effects model. Meta-regression explored the influence of patient and tumor characteristics on ORR and CBR. For randomized trials, hazard ratio comparing PARPi to control therapy were pooled using inverse variance and random effects. Analysis included 43 studies comprising 2409 patients. Among these, 1798 (75%) patients had BRCA mutations and 1146 (48%) were triple negative. In 10 studies (28%; n = 680 patients), the PARPi was given in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy. Weighted mean ORR was 45%; 64% when combined with platinum vs 37% with PARPi monotherapy (p < 0.001). Previous platinum-based chemotherapy was associated with lower ORR (p = 0.02). Compared to standard chemotherapy, progression-free survival was improved (HR 0.64, p < 0.001), but there was no difference in overall survival (HR 0.87, p = 0.06). There were no differences in ORR or CBR between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. PARPi are more active in combination with platinum than as monotherapy, with lower response if given as monotherapy after platinum exposure. Significant improvements in ORR translated to modest improvement in progression-free, but not overall survival. There was no association between ORR and BRCA mutations.

A phase I study of veliparib with cyclophosphamide and veliparib combined with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in advanced malignancies

PURPOSE

Veliparib (V), an oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, potentiates effects of alkylating agents and topoisomerase inhibitors in preclinical tumor models. We conducted a phase I trial of V with iv cyclophosphamide (C) and V plus iv doxorubicin (A) and C.

METHODS

Objectives were to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combinations, characterize V pharmacokinetics (PK) in the presence and absence of C, measure PAR in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and γH2AX in circulating tumor cells (CTCs). In Group 1, dose escalations of V from 10 to 50 mg every 12 h Days 1-4 plus C 450 to 750 mg/m² Day 3 in 21-day cycles were evaluated. In Group 2, V doses ranged from 50 to 150 mg every 12 h Days 1-4 with AC (60/600 mg/m²) Day 3 in 21-day cycles. In Group 3, patients received AC Day 1 plus V Days 1-7, and in Group 4, AC Day 1 plus V Days 1-14 was given in 21-day cycles to evaluate effects on γH2AX foci.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were enrolled. MTD was not reached for V and C. MTD for V and AC was V 100 mg every 12 h Days 1-4 with AC (60/600 mg/m2) Day 3 every 21 days. V PK appears to be dose-dependent and has no effect on the PK of C. Overall, neutropenia and anemia were the most common adverse events. Objective response in V and AC treated groups was 22% (11/49). Overall clinical benefit rate was 31% (25/80). PAR decreased in PBMCs. Percentage of γH2AX-positive CTCs increased after treatment with V and AC.

CONCLUSION

V and AC can be safely combined. Activity was observed in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Targeting the DNA damage response: PARP inhibitors and new perspectives in the landscape of cancer treatment

Cancer derives from alterations of pathways responsible for cell survival, differentiation and proliferation. Dysfunctions of mechanisms protecting genome integrity can promote oncogenesis but can also be exploited as therapeutic target. Poly-ADP-Ribose-Polymerase (PARP)-inhibitors, the first approved targeted agents able to tackle DNA damage response (DDR), have demonstrated antitumor activity, particularly when homologous recombination impairment is present. Despite the relevant results achieved, a large proportion of patients fail to obtain durable responses. The development of innovative treatments, able to overcome resistance and ensure long-lasting benefit for a wider population is still an unmet need. Moreover, improvement in biomarker assays is necessary to properly identify patients who can benefit from DDR targeting agents. Here we summarize the main DDR pathways, explain the current role of PARP inhibitors in cancer therapy and illustrate new therapeutic strategies targeting the DDR, focusing on the combinations of PARP inhibitors with other agents and on cell-cycle checkpoint inhibitors.

Metronomic Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

As disease control and quality of life play a leading role in metastatic breast cancer (MBC), metronomic chemotherapy (MCT) is gaining popularity alongside conventional chemotherapy (CCT) and targeted therapies.

SUMMARY

MCT, defined as continuous administration of low-dose chemotherapeutic agents, is accepted as a therapy that exerts its effects via immunomodulation, anti-angiogenesis and direct cytotoxic effects. Oral administration of MCT is safe, easy to handle, and allows for flexible drug dosing. Dose accumulations associated with non-tolerable side effects are rare, so the medication can be administered for longer periods of time. Patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic disease resistant to endocrine-based therapy and not requiring rapid tumor response are generally suitable for MCT. However, MCT may also be promising in patients with triple-negative and HER2-positive tumors without aggressive disease who prefer a lower toxicity profile compared to CCT. The most commonly used agents are cyclophosphamide (CTX), methotrexate (MTX), capecitabine (CAPE), and vinorelbine (VRL), whereby a combination of agents is frequently applied. Key Messages: Based on the growing body of evidence, MCT can be considered as a suitable treatment option in selected MBC patients. Nevertheless, there is an urgent need for randomized controlled trials comparing MCT with CCT, but also with best supportive care. Due to the multimodal mechanisms of action, the combination with targeted and immunological therapies may represent a new promising approach for the treatment of MBC.

Efficacy and Safety of PARP Inhibitors in Advanced or Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have shown promising results in metastatic triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs). We therefore performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this drug in patients with advanced or metastatic TNBC.

Methods

A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for synonyms of "PARP inhibitors" and "breast cancer" was carried out. All published phase II/III clinical studies of PARP inhibitors in patients with advanced/metastatic TNBC were screened. Data were extracted independently by two authors and analyzed using Review Manager software version 5.3. End points include overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events.

Results

Ten clinical trials were identified, with a total of 1,495 patients included. Pooled analyses showed that PARP inhibitors could provide a significant improvement of ORR [risk ratio (RR) = 2.00; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.14-3.50; p = 0.02) and PFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.68; 95%Cl, 0.59-0.77; p < 0.0001) compared to chemotherapy in the whole population. In subgroup analysis, patients with BRCA mutation had a higher objective response to PARP inhibitor, with an RR of 2.85 (95%CI, 1.34-6.06; p = 0.007) compared to BRCA wild-type patients. However, no significant difference in ORR was observed between the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) positive and non-HRD subgroups (RR = 1.82; 95%CI, 0.81-4.08; p = 0.14). Hematological toxicity is a common adverse event of PARP inhibitors.

Conclusions

PARP inhibitors are effective options for the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic TNBC. Compared with patients without germline BRCA mutation, patients with germline BRCA mutation could benefit more from PARP inhibitors. In clinical setting, hematological toxicity associated with PARP inhibitors should be monitored regularly.

Risk of fatigue with PARP inhibitors in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 29 phase II/III randomized controlled trials

Fatigue was a frequently reported adverse event associated with the use of PARP inhibitors. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to fully investigate the fatigue of PARP inhibitors in cancer patients. Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) treated with PARP inhibitors till July 2020. Twenty-nine RCTs and 9479 patients were included. This meta-analysis suggests that the use of PARP inhibitors significantly increase the risk of developing all-grade (RR, 1.25; 95%CI, 1.20-1.31; p < 0.00001; I2 = 48%) and high-grade fatigue (RR, 1.92; 95%CI, 1.51-2.45; p < 0.00001; I2 = 11%). Veliparib was associated with a relatively lower risk of fatigue. Patients with ovarian cancer tend to be associated with a higher risk of fatigue than those with non-ovarian cancer. Longer duration of therapy was associated with a higher risk of all-grade fatigue. Patients receiving PARP inhibitor monotherapy tends to be associated with a higher risk of all-grade fatigue than those receiving combination treatment.

Phase II trial of veliparib and temozolomide in metastatic breast cancer patients with and without BRCA1/2 mutations

PURPOSE

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of poly-(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) 1 and 2 inhibitor veliparib and temozolomide in metastatic breast cancer patients with and without germline BRCA1/2 mutations.

METHODS

In this single-arm phase II trial, patients with metastatic breast cancer received veliparib 30 to 40 mg twice daily on days 1 to 7 with concurrent temozolomide 150 mg/m² on days 1 to 5 of a 28-day cycle. The primary cohort was unselected for BRCA mutation status, and an expansion cohort enrolled only BRCA1/2 carriers. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in each cohort. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and evaluation of safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

In the primary cohort of 41 unselected patients, which included 9 BRCA mutation carriers, the ORR was 10% and clinical benefit rate at 4 months (CBR) was 27%. In the expansion cohort of 21 BRCA1/2 carriers, the ORR was 14% and CBR was 43%. Among all 30 BRCA1/2 carriers, the ORR was 23% versus 0% among non-carriers. In the subset of BRCA1/2 carriers, the ORR was 32% among platinum-naïve patients versus 9% among platinum-exposed patients. The median PFS was 3.3 months among BRCA1/2 carriers compared to 1.8 months among non-carriers (HR: 0.48, p = 0.006). A longer median PFS of 6.2 months was observed among BRCA1/2 carriers who had no prior platinum therapy. The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were thrombocytopenia (32%) and neutropenia (21%) that generally improved with dose modifications.

CONCLUSION

Veliparib and temozolomide demonstrated clinical activity in platinum-naïve BRCA-associated metastatic breast cancer with manageable toxicity at doses of veliparib well below the single-agent active dose. Although the study did not meet its primary endpoint in unselected nor BRCA-associated breast cancer, this regimen was further evaluated in the BROCADE 2 study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01009788 (ClinicalTrials.gov), November 9, 2009.

Harnessing DNA Repair Defects to Augment Immune-Based Therapies in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has poor prognosis with limited treatment options, with little therapeutic progress made during the past several decades. DNA damage response (DDR) associated therapies, including radiation and inhibitors of DDR, demonstrate potential efficacy against TNBC, especially under the guidance of genomic subtype-directed treatment. The tumor immune microenvironment also contributes greatly to TNBC malignancy and response to conventional and targeted therapies. Immunotherapy represents a developing trend in targeted therapies directed against TNBC and strategies combining immunotherapy and modulators of the DDR pathways are being pursued. There is increasing understanding of the potential interplay between DDR pathways and immune-associated signaling. As such, the question of how we treat TNBC regarding novel immuno-molecular strategies is continually evolving. In this review, we explore the current and upcoming treatment options of TNBC in the context of DNA repair mechanisms and immune-based therapies, with a focus on implications of recent genomic analyses and clinical trial findings.

Investigational Drug Treatments for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer (BC) and accounts for 10–20% of cases. Due to the lack of expression of several receptors, hormone therapy is largely ineffective for treatment purposes. Nevertheless, TNBC often responds very well to chemotherapy, which constitutes the most often recommended treatment. New beneficial targeted therapies are important to be investigated in order to achieve enhanced outcomes in patients with TNBC. This review will focus on recent therapeutic innovations for TNBC, focusing on various inhibitors such as phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway inhibitors, poly-ADP-ribosyl polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, aurora kinase inhibitors, histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs), and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Many breast cancer clinical trials with PARPi have been completed or are currently carried out, either by monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of PARPi in breast cancer patients as compared to chemotherapy.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, conference meetings and clinical trial registry was performed. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR). The secondary outcome was safety profile. The comparative effects were measured using hazard ratio (HR) or relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on types of intervention and baseline characteristics of patients.

RESULTS

Six RCTs (n = 1953) were included. Two RCTs were recognized as high risk. PARPi was associated with an improved PFS (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.56-0.74), OS (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.73-1.01), and a higher ORR (RR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.05-1.82). PARPi, however, significantly increased risk of grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (RR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.06-2.52). Monotherapy was observed with lower risk of disease progression and higher ORR rate than combination therapy, 0.56 to 0.65 and 2.21 to 1.05, respectively. For patients without prior platinum treatment, PARPi significantly improved PFS (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

PARPi was observed with a significantly improved efficacy in aspects of PFS and ORR, but also higher risk of grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia as compared to chemotherapy. PARPi was a better choice for patients who had not received previous platinum treatment.

PARP (Poly ADP-Ribose Polymerase) inhibitors for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer remains a challenge to treat. With emerging study results, it is important to interpret the available clinical data and apply the evidence offering the most effective treatment to the right patient. Poly(ADP Ribose) Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are a new class of drug and their role in the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer is being established.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy, safety profile, and potential harms of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. The primary outcome of interest was overall survival; secondary outcomes included progression-free survival, tumour response rate, quality of life, and adverse events.

SEARCH METHODS

On 8 June 2020, we searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE via OvidSP, Embase via OvidSP, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) search portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also searched proceedings from the major oncology conferences as well as scanned reference lists from eligible publications and contacted corresponding authors of trials for further information, where needed.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials on participants with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer comparing 1) chemotherapy in combination with PARP inhibitors, compared to the same chemotherapy without PARP inhibitors or 2) treatment with PARP inhibitors, compared to treatment with other chemotherapy. We included studies that reported on our primary outcome of overall survival and secondary outcomes including progression-free survival, tumour response rate, quality of life, and adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures defined by Cochrane. Summary statistics for the endpoints used hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall survival and progression-free survival, and odds ratios (OR) for response rate (RR) and toxicity.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 49 articles for qualitative synthesis, describing five randomised controlled trials that were included in the quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis). A sixth trial was assessed as eligible but had ended prematurely and no data were available for inclusion in our meta-analysis. Risk of bias was predominately low to unclear across all studies except in regards to performance bias (3/5 high risk) and detection bias for the outcomes of quality of life (2/2 high risk) and reporting of adverse events (3/5 high risk). High-certainty evidence shows there may be a small advantage in overall survival (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.00; 4 studies; 1435 patients). High-certainty evidence shows that PARP inhibitors offer an improvement in PFS in locally advanced/metastatic HER2-negative, BRCA germline mutated breast cancer patients (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.71; 5 studies; 1474 patients). There was no statistical heterogeneity for these outcomes. Subgroup analyses for PFS outcomes based on trial level data were performed for triple-negative breast cancer, hormone-positive and/or HER2-positive breast cancer, BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations, and patients who had received prior chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer or not. The subgroup analyses showed a persistent PFS benefit regardless of the subgroup chosen. Pooled analysis shows PARP inhibitors likely result in a moderate improvement in tumour response rate compared to other treatment arms (66.9% vs 48.9%; RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.54; 5 studies; 1185 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The most common adverse events reported across all five studies included neutropenia, anaemia and fatigue. Grade 3 or higher adverse events probably occur no less frequently in patients receiving PARP inhibitors (59.4% for PARP arm versus 64.5% for non-PARP arm, RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.04; 5 studies; 1443 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Only two studies reported quality of life outcomes so this was not amenable to meta-analysis. However, both studies that did assess quality of life showed PARP inhibitors were superior compared to physician's choice of chemotherapy in terms of participant-reported outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In people with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-negative, BRCA germline mutated breast cancer, PARP inhibitors offer an improvement in progression-free survival, and likely improve overall survival and tumour response rates. This systematic review provides evidence supporting the use of PARP inhibitors as part of the therapeutic strategy for breast cancer patients in this subgroup. The toxicity profile for PARP inhibitors is probably no worse than chemotherapy but more information is required regarding quality of life outcomes, highlighting the importance of collecting such data in future studies. Future studies should also be powered to detect clinically important differences in overall survival and could focus on the role of PARP inhibitors in other relevant breast cancer populations, including HER2-positive, BRCA-negative/homologous recombination repair-deficient and Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PDL1) positive.

PARP inhibitor treatment of advanced breast cancer beyond the BRCA-mutated type: a meta-analysis

Background: We conducted this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors with or without chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced breast cancer. Methods: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis were performed using RevMan 5.2 analysis software. Results: Six eligible randomized clinical trials involving 2080 patients were included. Regimens containing PARP inhibitors were significantly associated with higher objective response rate, longer progression-free survival and overall survival. The PARP inhibitor regimen group had a significantly higher rate of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia than the chemotherapy-only group. Conclusion: Regimens containing PARP inhibitors are effective and safe for BRCA-mutated advanced breast cancer patients. The efficacy appears to be only marginal in patients with BRCA status unselected.

DNA damage response inhibitors: An avenue for TNBC treatment

The DNA damage response (DDR) is critical for the maintenance of genomic stability by sensing DNA damage, regulating cell cycle and initiating DNA repair. Drugs targeting DDR pathways have been increasingly exploited in treating various tumors. Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly heterogeneous and aggressive tumor with constitutive activation of oncogenes, inducing replication stress and DNA damage, which require the DDR for survival. In addition, emerging studies have demonstrated that TNBC harbors aberrant genetic alterations in DDR pathways, such as a high frequency of p53 dysfunction and BRCA1/2 mutations. DDR alterations force TNBC to rely on the existing DDR pathways for survival, and make TNBC particularly sensitive to specific DDR inhibitors, such as high sensitivity of TNBC with BRCA1/2 mutations to PARP inhibitors. This review first and comprehensively covers the current status of the development of DDR inhibitors and discusses the mechanism of targeting the DDR in TNBC. Preclinical and clinical studies on inhibitors of the ATR-CHK1-WEE1 pathway and PARP inhibitors, the most studied inhibitors, and some other DDR inhibitors as monotherapy or combination therapy in TNBC are summarized. We also highlight the possible predictive biomarkers for these DDR inhibitors and their potential combination strategies with chemotherapy, radiotherapy or other targeted agents to optimize the efficacy of DDR inhibitors in TNBC treatment. In conclusion, this review discussed the recent considerations related to the use of DDR inhibitors for TNBC and provides a perspective to address future directions and potential therapeutic strategies for patients with TNBC.

Deep exploration of PARP inhibitors in breast cancer: monotherapy and combination therapy

OBJECTIVE

Nearly 5% of patients with breast cancer carry germline BRCA mutations, which are more common in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Previous clinical trials demonstrated the therapeutic efficacy of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) against BRCA-mutated metastatic breast cancer. The current study conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis of the clinical efficiency and safety of PARPis, either alone or combined with chemotherapy, in patients with TNBC.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify randomized controlled trials comparing PARPi therapy with chemotherapy, and comparisons of chemotherapy plus PARPis with chemotherapy alone were included. The study endpoints included the clinical response, progression-free survival, and adverse event rates.

RESULTS

PARPi therapy was revealed to improve progression-free survival in patients with advanced breast cancer, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Subgroup analysis illustrated that patients with mutant BRCA1 and mutant BRCA2 and those who had not been treated with platinum-based agents could specifically benefit from PARPis.

CONCLUSION

PARPi monotherapy can significantly improve clinical outcomes in patients with advanced breast cancer, especially those with TNBC, those who had not previously received platinum therapy, and those with mutant BRCA1/2. PARPis combined with chemotherapy represent new treatment options for patients with advanced cancer.

Haematologic toxicities with PARP inhibitors in cancer patients: an up-to-date meta-analysis of 29 randomized controlled trials

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have emerged as one of the most exciting new treatments for patients with certain types of cancer. Haematologic toxicities are common adverse events (AEs) for all PARP inhibitors. We conducted a meta-analysis to fully investigate the haematologic toxicities of PARP inhibitors in cancer patients.

STUDY DESIGN

PubMed/Medline and Embase were searched for articles published till September 2020. The relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in cancer patients treated with PARP inhibitors were retrieved, and the systematic evaluation was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine RCTs and 9247 patients were included. The current meta-analysis suggests that the use of PARP inhibitors significantly increases the risk of all-grade anaemia (RR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.78-3.01; p < 0.00001), neutropenia (RR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.38-2.07; p < 0.00001) and thrombocytopenia (RR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.87-3.45; p < 0.00001). The use of these agents also significantly increased the risk of high-grade anaemia (RR, 3.06; 95% CI, 2.11-4.43; p < 0.00001), neutropenia (RR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.33-2.07; p < 0.00001) and thrombocytopenia (RR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.83-4.16; p < 0.00001). Anaemia was the most common haematologic toxicity, and all the five included PARP inhibitors were associated with a significant increased risk of anaemia. Combination treatment may reduce the risk of anaemia and thrombocytopenia compared to those receiving PARP inhibitor monotherapy.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The available data suggested that the use of PARP inhibitors was associated with a significantly increased risk of haematologic toxicities.

Myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia in patients treated with PARP inhibitors: a safety meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and a retrospective study of the WHO pharmacovigilance database

BACKGROUND

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have shown efficacy and acceptable safety in a range of neoplasms, particularly in ovarian cancers. However, some concerns have emerged regarding rare and delayed adverse events including cases of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia, for which data are scarce. The aim of this study was to estimate the risk of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia related to PARP inhibitors, via a systematic review and safety meta-analysis, and to describe clinical features of PARP inhibitor-related myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia cases reported in WHO's pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase).

METHODS

We systematically reviewed randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PARP inhibitor therapy versus control treatments (placebo and non-placebo) in adults (age ≥18 years) treated for cancer in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry with ongoing surveillance up to May 31, 2020. The date range for included studies was not restricted. By a stepwise method to capture all available adverse events, we first extracted data on myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia cases from ClinicalTrials.gov. If cases were not available, we extracted them from published manuscripts, or subsequently contacted corresponding authors or sponsors to provide data. RCTs without available data from ClinicalTrials.gov, publications, or corresponding authors or sponsors were excluded. The primary outcome was the summary risk of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia related to PARP inhibition versus placebo treatment in RCTs. We used a fixed-effects meta-analysis to obtain Peto odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs. In a separate observational, retrospective, cross-sectional pharmacovigilance study of VigiBase, cases of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia related to PARP inhibitor therapy were extracted on May 3, 2020, and clinical features summarised with a focus on median duration of PARP inhibitor exposure, median latency period between first drug exposure and diagnosis, and proportion of cases resulting in death. Our systematic review and safety meta-analysis were registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020175050. Our retrospective pharmacovigilance study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04326023.

FINDINGS

For our safety meta-analysis, initial searches identified 1617 citations, and 31 RCTs were systematically reviewed for eligibility. 28 RCTs with available adverse events were analysed (18 placebo and ten non-placebo RCTs), with 5693 patients in PARP inhibitor groups and 3406 patients in control groups. Based on the 18 placebo RCTs (n=7307 patients), PARP inhibitors significantly increased the risk of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia compared with placebo treatment (Peto OR 2·63 [95% CI 1·13-6·14], p=0·026) with no between-study heterogeneity (I²=0%, χ² p=0·91). The incidence of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia across PARP inhibitor groups was 0·73% (95% CI 0·50-1·07; I²=0%, χ² p=0·87; 21 events out of 4533 patients) and across placebo groups was 0·47% (0·26-0·85; I²=0%, χ² p=1·00; three events out of 2774 patients). All 28 RCTs were rated as having unclear risk of bias. In VigiBase, 178 cases of myelodysplastic syndrome (n=99) and acute myeloid leukaemia (n=79) related to PARP inhibitor therapy were extracted. In cases with available data, median treatment duration was 9·8 months (IQR 3·6-17·4; n=96) and median latency period since first exposure to a PARP inhibitor was 17·8 months (8·4-29·2; n=58). Of 104 cases that reported outcomes, 47 (45%) resulted in death.

INTERPRETATION

PARP inhibitors increased the risk of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia versus placebo treatment. These delayed and often lethal adverse events should be studied further to improve clinical understanding, particularly in the front-line maintenance setting.

FUNDING

None.

Gastrointestinal events with PARP inhibitors in cancer patients: A meta-analysis of phase II/III randomized controlled trials

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

PARP inhibitors are currently one of the most promising PARP targeted drugs for patients with certain types of cancer. Gastrointestinal (GI) events are common adverse events for all PARP inhibitors. We conducted this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to fully investigate the incidence and the relative risk of GI events in cancer patients receiving PARP inhibitors.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trials in cancer patients treated with PARP inhibitors were retrieved, and the systematic evaluation was conducted. Embase and PubMed/Medline were searched for articles published till July 2020.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine RCTs and 9529 patients were included. The present meta-analysis suggests that the use of PARP inhibitors significantly increases the risk of developing all-grade nausea (RR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.29-1.66; p < .00001), vomiting (RR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.17-1.64; p = .0001), diarrhoea (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.06-1.23; p = .0003) and decreased appetite (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.14-1.36; p < .00001), but not for constipation. And the use of these agents significantly increased the risk of high-grade nausea (RR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.44-2.74; p < .0001), vomiting (RR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.11-2.14; p = .01) and decreased appetite (RR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.22-3.40; p = .007), except for diarrhoea and constipation. Nausea was the most common GI event for these agents. Patients receiving veliparib were associated with a relatively lower risk of all-grade nausea and vomiting. Patients with ovarian cancer tend to have a higher risk of all-grade nausea and vomiting than those with non-ovarian cancer. The risk of all-grade nausea and vomiting tended to be higher when PARP inhibitors treatment was longer.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

PARP inhibitors were associated with a significant increased risk of GI events. Clinicians should be aware of these risks and perform regular monitoring.

Evaluation of the contribution of randomised cancer clinical trials evaluating agents without documented single-agent activity

BACKGROUND

With the development of targeted agents, the approach to combination cancer therapy has evolved to focus on identifying ways in which pathway inhibition by one agent may enhance the activity of other agents. In theory, this implies that under this new paradigm, agents are no longer required to show single-agent activity, as the pathway inhibited by the targeted agent may only have a therapeutic effect when given with other agents. This raises the question of the extent to which anticancer agents without single-agent activity can contribute to effective combination regimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed outcomes of randomised phase 2 combination trials sponsored by the National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program that were activated in 2008 to 2017 and noted the single-agent activity of the experimental agents.

RESULTS

Fifty-three trials were identified, and 50 had available results: 7 (14%), 15 (30%) and 28 (56%) had experimental agents with single-agent activity classified as active, inactive and indeterminate, respectively. Thirteen per cent (95% CI=1.7% to 40.5%) of trials evaluating inactive agents and 11.6% (95% CI=3.9% to 25.1%) of trials evaluating agents without known single-agent activity (pooled inactive and indeterminate) were positive, compared with 42.9% (95% CI=9.9% to 81.6%) for agents with single-agent activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating agents without documented single-agent activity into treatment regimens is unlikely to produce meaningful improvements in activity unless there is compelling biological rationale. This finding has important implications for the prioritisation of anticancer agents for combination testing, and for the allocation of clinical trial resources.

PARP Inhibition in Cancer: An Update on Clinical Development

PARP (poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase) inhibitors represent a novel class of anti-cancer therapy; they take advantage of synthetic lethality and induce cell death by exploiting a defect in DNA repair. This class of medication was initially evaluated in patients with BRCA-associated tumors, but efficacy was also demonstrated in other populations. Since 2014, four PARP inhibitors have been approved in various indications: olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib in high-grade serous ovarian cancer, and olaparib and talazoparib in metastatic breast cancer. The exact indications and study populations vary slightly between the different approvals in both disease states but there is significant overlap. PARP inhibitors continue to be investigated in ongoing clinical trials. In line with other targeted therapies, benefit appears to be strongest in a distinct population of patients with BRCA mutations or other defects in homologous recombination repair. Combination therapies, which include anti-angiogenesis agents and immunotherapy, show promise as a strategy to broaden efficacy for unselected patients. Initial studies of PARP inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy were limited by toxicity, but further studies are underway. To date, head-to-head trials comparing various PARP inhibitors have not been conducted, so questions remain in terms of choosing a PARP inhibitor to administer when indications overlap, as well as how to sequence these medications. Here we review both completed and ongoing clinical trials involving PARP inhibitors and mechanisms of resistance to this class of drugs.

Recent clinical evidence on metronomic dosing in controlled clinical trials: a systematic literature review

Introduction: Metronomic dosing is used to give continuous chemotherapy at low doses. The low doses have minimal side effects and may enable cancer treatment to be remodeled toward the management of chronic disease.Methods: We searched PubMed database to obtain relevant clinical trials studying metronomic chemotherapy (MCT). Our main focus was to find controlled phase II and phase III trials.Results: This systematic review summarizes the results of 91 clinical reports focusing on randomized phase II and phase III clinical studies between 2012 and 2018. During that time, nine randomized phase II and 10 randomized phase III studies were published. In the majority of the studies, MCT was well tolerated, and major side effects were rarely seen. Altogether, 4 phase III studies and 4 randomized phase II studies presented positive results and some clinical benefit.Discussion: Most of the studies did not show significantly improved overall survival or progression-free survival. Typically, the metronomic dosing was explored in a maintenance setup and was added to other agents given within normal high doses, whereas no trial was performed challenging metronomic dosing and best supportive care in later treatment lines. Therefore, there is no definite evidence on the efficacy of single metronomic dosing and firm evidence of metronomic dosing is still missing. There is a need for further confirmation of the usefulness of this approach in clinical practice.

Therapeutic Potential of the miRNA-ATM Axis in the Management of Tumor Radioresistance

The ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) protein kinase is widely known for its function as a chief mobilizer of the DNA damage response (DDR) upon DNA double-strand breaks. ATM orchestrates the DDR by modulating the expression of various miRNAs through several mechanisms. On the other hand, a set of miRNAs contribute to tight regulation of ATM by directly targeting the 3'-untranslated region of ATM mRNA. This review addresses the therapeutic application and molecular mechanisms that underlie the intricate interactions between miRNAs and ATM. It also describes therapeutic delivery of miRNAs in different environments such as hypoxic tumor microenvironments.

The role of metronomic chemotherapy in the era of cancer immunotherapy: an oncologist's perspective

Metronomic chemotherapy (MCTX) encompasses a set of chemotherapy (CTX) doses significantly below the conventional maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and delivered largely continually (without the prolonged drug-free breaks typical of MTD CTX). [...]

The Use of Immunotherapy to Treat Metastatic Breast Cancer

This article reviews the principal attempts of immune-modulation or immune therapy in metastatic breast cancer. It considers their rationale and reports on results from the relevant key clinical trials. Immune-modulatory or immune-stimulating cytokines used alone or combined with conventional therapies is among the principal approaches of immune manipulation in breast cancer. As this issue has recently been reviewed by us, the aim of the current article is to discuss our updated and unpublished data on this topic. Overall survival in luminal (28 patients) and non-luminal (9 patients) molecular subtypes is 91 and 59 months respectively that is about two and half or three times longer than expected. Thereafter, we focus on monoclonal antibodies (mAb) based-therapies including novel strategies to overcome resistance to anti-HER2 mAb. The main vaccine platforms in different molecular subtypes and immune therapies in triple negative metastatic breast cancer (m-TNBC) are discussed in the last sections. Some phase III investigations have already changed the current clinical practice. In fact, pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and docetaxel is the recommended first line regimen in HER2 positive locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer and bevacizumab plus paclitaxel or docetaxel is a reasonable option for m-TNBC. In some other observational or phase I/II studies on first-line trastuzumab plus chemotherapy and hormonal therapy and in that on HER2 peptide/protein vaccines promising although preliminary findings have been reported to be further validated. In the remaining studies, results were disappointing. In the future, finding new predictive biomarkers and exploring more suitable synergizing combinations, time and dose-dependent-scheduled sequences of currently and further investigated immunological approaches are main challenges.

Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibition for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Meta-Analysis of Placebo-Controlled Trials

Background: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy is characterized by pain, numbness, and tingling in the hands and feet and by diminished quality of life. Multiple previous studies, mostly preclinical, suggest that poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors may help with these symptoms. Objective: To assess the relationship between PARP inhibition and prevention/palliation of peripheral neuropathy in a clinical setting. Design: Meta-analysis of placebo-controlled clinical trials with PARP inhibitors. Setting/Subjects: We conducted 9 literature searches that included PubMed and other sources to compile fully published placebo-controlled clinical trials that tested PARP inhibitors and that reported on peripheral neuropathy. Measurements: The relative risks for neuropathy of all grades based on PARP inhibition were calculated for each trial. Each trial was weighted by its respective sample size. A forest plot was constructed. Results: Five trials, inclusive of 843 patients, met this study's eligibility criteria. Four included a concomitant PARP inhibitor (either olaparib or veliparib) and paclitaxel, a neuropathy-causing chemotherapy agent; the remaining trial evaluated long-term monotherapy with olaparib. The pooled overall relative risk for the development of neuropathy with PARP inhibition was 1.06 (95% confidence interval: 1-1.4). Conclusions: PARP inhibition does not appear to reduce the risk of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Whether PARP inhibitors may palliate (rather than prevent) neuropathy remains an area in need of further investigation.

Pan-European Expert Meeting on the Use of Metronomic Chemotherapy in Advanced Breast Cancer Patients: The PENELOPE Project

INTRODUCTION

Metronomic chemotherapy (mCHT) is a treatment regimen in which drugs are administered frequently or continuously and that maintains low, prolonged, and pharmacologically active plasma concentrations of drugs to avoid toxicity associated with traditional chemotherapy regimens, while achieving tumor response. Despite the increasing use of mCHT in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and the endorsement of mCHT in guidelines, no consensus exists about which patients may substantially benefit from mCHT, which agents can be recommended, and in which treatment setting mCHT is most appropriate.

METHODS

In October 2017, ten international experts in the management of breast cancer convened to develop a report describing the current status of the use of mCHT for the treatment of advanced breast cancer, based not only on current literature but also on their opinion. The Delphi method was used to reach consensus.

RESULTS

A full consensus was reached concerning the acknowledgement that mCHT is not simply a different way of administering chemotherapy but a truly new treatment option. The best-known effect of mCHT is on angiogenesis inhibition, but exciting new data are on the way regarding potential activity on immune system activation. The experts strongly suggest that the ideal patients for mCHT are those with hormone receptor (HR)-positive tumors or those with triple-negative disease. Independently of HR status, mCHT could be an advantageous option for elderly patients, who are often under-treated simply because of their age.

CONCLUSION

Current data support the use of mCHT in selected patients with MBC.

FUNDING

Pierre Fabre.

A Bayesian network meta-analysis of the efficacy of targeted therapies and chemotherapy for treatment of triple-negative breast cancer

Triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease with poorer prognosis than other subtypes, yet effective therapies are still not available. We aimed to compare the efficacy of various targeted therapies with chemotherapy (CT) in TNBC patients using a network meta‐analysis. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. A total of 27 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), involving 6924 TNBC patients, were included. Olaparib significantly improved PFS (0.43, 0.29‐0.64) and ORR (2.57, 1.31‐5.09) in comparison with CT. As for bevacizumab + CT, it showed a significant improvement of PFS (0.66, 0.55‐0.80) and ORR (2.15, 1.16‐4.05) compared with CT + placebo. It was also superior to CT alone in PFS (0.48, 0.35‐0.65) and pCR (1.30, 1.13‐1.49 for breast and axillary nodes and 1.26, 1.11‐1.44 for breast). Other targeted agents like iniparib, sorafenib, cetuximab, and ipatasertib combined with CT showed significant superiority in PFS compared with CT alone, and the HRs were 0.75 (0.62‐0.90), 0.44 (0.21‐0.91), 0.67 (0.47‐0.96), and 0.44 (0.24‐0.81), respectively, while some other agents such as sunitinib and cetuximab had the lowest SUCRA in OS, PFS, or ORR without any benefits. In conclusion, our results indicated that the addition of bevacizumab to CT was beneficial for TNBC patients, and olaparib had a great effect in PFS and ORR, especially for those with BRCA mutations. When combined with CT, targeted agents including iniparib, sorafenib, cetuximab, and ipatasertib may have better efficacies for treating TNBC.

Clinical Efficacy of a Novel Therapeutic Principle, Anakoinosis

Classic tumor therapy, consisting of cytotoxic agents and/or targeted therapy, has not overcome therapeutic limitations like poor risk genetic parameters, genetic heterogeneity at different metastatic sites or the problem of undruggable targets. Here we summarize data and trials principally following a completely different treatment concept tackling systems biologic processes: the principle of communicative reprogramming of tumor tissues, i.e., anakoinosis (ancient greek for communication), aims at establishing novel communicative behavior of tumor tissue, the hosting organ and organism via re-modeling gene expression, thus recovering differentiation, and apoptosis competence leading to cancer control - in contrast to an immediate, "poisoning" with maximal tolerable doses of targeted or cytotoxic therapies. Therefore, we introduce the term "Master modulators" for drugs or drug combinations promoting evolutionary processes or regulating homeostatic pathways. These "master modulators" comprise a broad diversity of drugs, characterized by the capacity for reprogramming tumor tissues, i.e., transcriptional modulators, metronomic low-dose chemotherapy, epigenetically modifying agents, protein binding pro-anakoinotic drugs, such as COX-2 inhibitors, IMiDs etc., or for example differentiation inducing therapies. Data on 97 anakoinosis inducing schedules indicate a favorable toxicity profile: The combined administration of master modulators, frequently (with poor or no monoactivity) may even induce continuous complete remission in refractory metastatic neoplasia, irrespectively of the tumor type. That means recessive components of the tumor, successively developing during tumor ontogenesis, are accessible by regulatory active drug combinations in a therapeutically meaningful way. Drug selection is now dependent on situative systems characteristics, to less extent histology dependent. To sum up, anakoinosis represents a new substantive therapy principle besides novel targeted therapies.

Inhibitors targeting CDK4/6, PARP and PI3K in breast cancer: a review

Breast cancer is the global leading cause of cancer-related death in women and it represents a major health burden worldwide. One of the promising breast cancer therapeutic avenues is through small molecule inhibitors (SMIs) which have undergone rapid progress with successful clinical trials. Recently, three emerging and vital groups of proteins are targeted by SMIs for breast cancer treatment, namely cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6), poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K). Several of these inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of breast cancer patients or progressed into late-stage clinical trials. Thus, modeling from these successful clinical trials, as well as their limitations, is pivotal for future development and trials of other inhibitors or therapeutic regimens targeting breast cancer patients. In this review, we discuss eight recently approved or novel SMIs against CDK4/6 (palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib), PARP (olaparib, veliparib and talazoparib), and PI3K (buparlisib and alpelisib). The mechanisms of action, series of clinical trials and limitations are described for each inhibitor.

Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (PPAR)γ Agonists as Master Modulators of Tumor Tissue

In most clinical trials, thiazolidinediones do not show any relevant anti-cancer activity when used as mono-therapy. Clinical inefficacy contrasts ambiguous pre-clinical data either favoring anti-tumor activity or tumor promotion. However, if thiazolidinediones are combined with additional regulatory active drugs, so-called ‘master modulators’ of tumors, i.e., transcriptional modulators, metronomic low-dose chemotherapy, epigenetically modifying agents, protein binding pro-anakoinotic drugs, such as COX-2 inhibitors, IMiDs, etc., the results indicate clinically relevant communicative reprogramming of tumor tissues, i.e., anakoinosis, meaning ‘communication’ in ancient Greek. The concerted activity of master modulators may multifaceted diversify palliative care or even induce continuous complete remission in refractory metastatic tumor disease and hematologic neoplasia by establishing novel communicative behavior of tumor tissue, the hosting organ, and organism. Re-modulation of gene expression, for example, the up-regulation of tumor suppressor genes, may recover differentiation, apoptosis competence, and leads to cancer control—in contrast to an immediate, ‘poisoning’ with maximal tolerable doses of targeted/cytotoxic therapies. The key for uncovering the therapeutic potential of Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) agonists is selecting the appropriate combination of master modulators for inducing anakoinosis: Now, anakoinosis is trend setting by establishing a novel therapeutic pillar while overcoming classic obstacles of targeted therapies, such as therapy resistance and (molecular-)genetic tumor heterogeneity.

Poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase as therapeutic target: lessons learned from its inhibitors

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases are a family of DNA-dependent nuclear enzymes catalyzing the transfer of ADP-ribose moieties from cellular nicotinamide-adenine-dinucleotide to a variety of target proteins. Although they have been considered as resident nuclear elements of the DNA repair machinery, recent works revealed a more intricate physiologic role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases with numerous extranuclear activities. Indeed, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases participate in fundamental cellular processes like chromatin remodelling, transcription or regulation of the cell-cycle. These new insight into the physiologic roles of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases widens the range of human pathologies in which pharmacologic inhibition of these enzymes might have a therapeutic potential. Here, we overview our current knowledge on extranuclear functions of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases with a particular focus on the mitochondrial ones and discuss potential fields of future clinical applications.

How shall we treat early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): from the current standard to upcoming immuno-molecular strategies

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a long-lasting orphan disease in terms of little therapeutic progress during the past several decades and still the standard of care remains chemotherapy. Experimental discovery of molecular signatures including the ‘BRCAness’ highlighted the innate heterogeneity of TNBC, generating the diversity of TNBC phenotypes. As it contributes to enhancing genomic instability, it has widened the therapeutic spectrum of TNBC. In particular, unusual sensitivity to DNA damaging agents was denoted in patients with BRCA deficiency, suggesting therapeutic benefit from platinum and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. However, regardless of enriched chemosensitivity and immunogenicity, majority of patients with TNBC still suffer from dismal clinical outcomes including early relapse and metastatic spread. Therefore, efforts into more precise and personalised treatment are critical at this point. Accordingly, the advance of multiomics has revealed novel actionable targets including PI3K-Akt-mTOR and epidermal growth factor receptor signalling pathways, which might actively participate in modulating the chemosensitivity and immune system. Also, TNBC has long been considered a potential protagonist of immunotherapy in breast cancer, supported by abundant tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and heterogeneous tumour microenvironment. Despite that, earlier studies showed somewhat unsatisfactory results of monotherapy with immune-checkpoint inhibitors, consistently durable responses in responders were noteworthy. Based on these results, further combinatorial trials either with other chemotherapy or targeted agents are underway. Incorporating immune-molecular targets into combination as well as refining the standard chemotherapy might be the key to unlock the future of TNBC. In this review, we share the current and upcoming treatment options of TNBC in the framework of scientific and clinical data, especially focusing on early stage of TNBC.

Metronomic Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: The Future Is Now?

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) shows a very bad prognosis, even in early stages of disease. Metronomic chemotherapy refers to the minimum biologically effective dose of a chemotherapy agent given as a continuous dosing regimen with no prolonged drug-free breaks that leads to antitumor activity. In the present article, we review preclinical and clinical data of metronomic administration of chemotherapy agents with or without biological agents in TNBC cell lines and patients, contextually reporting data from the VICTOR-2 study in the subgroup of patients with TNBC, in order to stimulate new ideas for the design of clinical trials in this subset of patients.