Oral formulation of bendamustine hydrochloride for patients with advanced solid tumors; a phase 1 study

Comparable efficacy of oral bendamustine versus intravenous administration in treating hematologic malignancies

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze potential differences in antitumor efficacy and pharmacokinetics between intravenous (IV) bendamustine and a novel orally administered (PO) bendamustine agent that is utilizing the beneficial properties of superstaturated solid dispersions formulated in nanoparticles.

METHODS

Pharmacokinetics of IV versus PO bendamustine were determined by analysis of plasma samples collected from NSG mice treated with either IV or PO bendamustine. Plasma samples were analyzed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry following a liquid-liquid extraction to determine peak bendamustine concentration, area under the concentration-time curve, and the half-life in-vivo. In-vitro cytotoxicity of bendamustine against human non-Hodgkin Burkitt's Lymphoma (Raji), multiple myeloma (MM.1s), and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (RS4;11) cell lines was determined over time using MTS assays. Luciferase-tagged versions of the aforementioned cell lines were used to determine in-vivo bendamustine cytotoxicity of IV versus PO bendamustine at two different doses.

RESULTS

Bendamustine at a high dose in-vitro causes cell death. There was no significant difference in antitumor activity between IV and novel PO bendamustine at a physiologically relevant concentration in all three xenograft models. In-vivo pharmacokinetics showed the oral bioavailability of bendamustine in mice to be 51.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel oral bendamustine agent tested exhibits good oral bioavailability and systemic exposure for in-vivo antitumor efficacy comparable to IV bendamustine. An oral bendamustine formulation offers exciting clinical potential as an additional method of administration for bendamustine and warrants further evaluation in clinical studies.

Comparable Efficacy of Oral Bendamustine versus Intravenous Administration in Treating Hematologic Malignancies

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to analyze potential differences in antitumor efficacy and pharmacokinetics between intravenous (IV) bendamustine (BEN) and a novel orally administered bendamustine agent (PO) that is utilizing the beneficial properties of superstaturated solid dispersions formulated in nanoparticles.

Methods

Pharmacokinetics of IV versus PO BEN were determined by analysis of plasma samples collected from NSG mice treated with either IV or PO BEN. Plasma samples were analyzed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) following a liquid-liquid extraction to determine peak BEN concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and the half-life (t1/2) in-vivo. in-vitro cytotoxicity of BEN against human non-Hodgkin's Burkitt's Lymphoma (Raji), multiple myeloma (MM.1s), and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (RS4;11) cell lines was determined over time using MTS assays. Luciferase-tagged versions of the aforementioned cell lines were used to determine in-vivo BEN cytotoxicity of IV versus PO BEN at two different doses.

Results

Bendamustine at a high dose in-vitro causes cell death. There was no significant difference in antitumor efficacy between IV and novel PO BEN at a physiologically relevant concentration in all three xenograft models. In-vivo pharmacokinetics showed the oral bioavailability of BEN in mice to be 51.4%.

Conclusions

The novel oral BEN agent tested exhibits good oral bioavailability and systemic exposure for in-vivo antitumor efficacy comparable to IV BEN. An oral BEN formulation offers exciting clinical potential as an additional method of administration for bendamustine and warrants further evaluation in clinical studies.