Estimation of potential arsenic leaching from its phases in excavated sedimentary and metamorphic rocks

Investigation on the leaching behavior of natural aggregates using percolation test and total content

In the construction industry, environmental behavior of aggregates has been monitored thanks to leaching tests, especially for alternative aggregates obtained from waste (e.g., construction and demolition waste, MSWI). Few studies were carried on the leaching behavior of natural aggregates, which are often not regulated for their substance release in most EU member states (as France). Leachable content of some heavy metals, halides, and sulfates on natural aggregates was investigated using up-flow percolation test EN 16637-3 and compared to threshold values. Only three samples (NS2, NG1, and NG8) show one element which exceeded threshold values (As, Zn, As, respectively), among the 19 natural aggregates tested for leaching. In this study, three natural aggregates (NG1, NS1, NS2) have been chosen because of their measurable leaching values. Total content was obtained through acid digestion. Influence of grain size on leaching results was investigated. Predominant release mechanisms were determined using EN 16637-3 - Annex D, based on percolation results such as pH, electrical conductivity, and leached content, and were then discussed. Detailed results for releases of As, Ba, Ni, Zn, SO42-, and F- were investigated. EN 16637-3 - Annex D shows some limits, especially for trace elements. The pH was found to be one of the most important factors influencing leaching release of most elements, being more important than grain size. By comparing total content with released quantities, it has been shown that As and Mo in NS2 are easily leached, hence present in a very soluble chemical form. Determining release mechanisms accurately in this study seems only possible for elements present in significant amounts.

Assessment of effectiveness in stabilization/solidification of arsenic-contaminated soil: long-term leaching test and geophysical measurement

This study focused on evaluating the effectiveness of stabilizer/binding agents in immobilizing arsenic (As) in contaminated soil using both geochemical and geophysical monitoring methods. The effluent from the stabilizer/binding agent's application and control columns was analyzed, and the status of the columns was monitored using electrical resistivity (ER) and induced polarization (IP) methods. As stabilizers/binder, acid mine drainage sludge (AMDS) and steel slag (SS) were used, which delayed As and Ca leaching time and significantly reduced As leaching amount. Determination coefficients for As and Fe leaching exhibited elevated values (control column, R2 = 0.955; AMDS column, R2 = 0.908; and SS column, R2 = 0.833). A discernible decline in the concentration of leached Fe was accompanied by a corresponding reduction in IP. The determination coefficients correlating IP and Fe leaching remained substantial (control column, R2 = 0.768; AMDS column, R2 = 0.807; and SS column, R2 = 0.818). Such IP measurements manifest as instrumental tools in monitoring and assessing the retention capacity of applied stabilizer/binding agents in As-affected soils, thereby furnishing crucial data for the enduring surveillance of stabilization/solidification locales. This research posits a swift and continuous monitoring method for solidification/stabilization locales in situ.

Management of arsenic-contaminated excavated soils: A review

Ongoing global sustainable development and underground space utilization projects have inadvertently exposed many excavated soils naturally contaminated with geogenic arsenic (As). Recent investigations have revealed that As in certain excavated soils, especially those originating from deep construction projects, has exceeded regulatory limits, threatening the environment and human health. While numerous remediation techniques exist for treating As-contaminated soil, the unique characteristics of geogenic As contamination in excavated soil require specific measures when leachable As content surpasses established regulatory limits. Consequently, several standard leaching tests have been developed globally to assess As leaching from contaminated soil. However, a comprehensive comparative analysis of these methods and their implementation in contaminated excavated soils remains lacking. Furthermore, the suitability and efficacy of most conventional and advanced techniques for remediating As-contaminated excavated soils remained unexplored. Therefore, this study critically reviews relevant literature and summarize recent research findings concerning the management and mitigation of geogenic As in naturally contaminated excavated soil. The objective of this study was to outline present status of excavated soil globally, the extent and mode of As enrichment, management and mitigation approaches for As-contaminated soil, global excavated soil recycling strategies, and relevant soil contamination countermeasure laws. Additionally, the study provides a concise overview and comparison of standard As leaching tests developed across different countries. Furthermore, this review assessed the suitability of prominent and widely accepted As remediation techniques based on their applicability, acceptability, cost-effectiveness, duration, and overall treatment efficiency. This comprehensive review contributes to a more profound comprehension of the challenges linked to geogenic As contamination in excavated soils.

Impact of arsenic releaching from excavated rock after once-arsenic leaching on potential arsenic leaching

Massive quantities of naturally arsenic-containing rocks are excavated from urbanized and mountainous areas for construction. Treatments such as chemical immobilization are applied to such excavated rocks for reuse. To design such treatments, determining the potentially leachable arsenic amounts in excavated rocks is imperative. This study aims to understand whether the arsenic releached amount from the excavated rock after once-arsenic leaching should be included in the potentially leachable arsenic amount or estimated using the sequential extraction procedure (SEP). Arsenic was releached at exceeding 0.01 mg L^-1, even from the excavated rock that leached arsenic to less than 0.01 mg L^-1, and this amount corresponded to approximately 12% of that of arsenic leached from the arsenic non-leached rock. The arsenic (re)leached amount corresponded to 84-116% (102 ± 7%) of that of arsenic in the readily soluble fraction using SEP, regardless of whether the arsenic was leached or not. These results indicate that the source of arsenic (re)leached from the excavated rock is arsenic extracted as the readily soluble fraction through SEP, regardless of whether the rock was arsenic-leached or not. This study's findings suggest that the arsenic releached amount from the excavated rock should be considered in the potentially leachable arsenic amount. In addition, the potentially leachable arsenic amount can be relatively and readily estimated by performing SEP.

Suppression of arsenic leaching from excavated soil and the contribution of soluble and insoluble components in steel slag on arsenic immobilization

A huge amount of soil is excavated by tunnel and road construction projects in urban, coastal, and mountainous regions. These projects enable the effective use of underground spaces, and generally, the excavated soil is expected to be reused after treatment, which is required due to the potential release of geogenic arsenic from the soil. The present study investigated the level of water-soluble arsenic and arsenic phases in excavated soil in order to identify how arsenic is immobilized by soluble calcium and insoluble components in steel slag. The soluble calcium was found to suppress the level of water-soluble arsenic as well as arsenic in fraction 1 (nonspecifically bound) identified by sequential extraction from the soil but increased the level of fraction 2: specifically bound arsenic. The insoluble component did not suppress the level of water-soluble arsenic, but decreased and increased the arsenic levels in fractions 2 and 3 (amorphous iron/aluminum oxide bound), respectively. A column percolation test demonstrated that the arsenic that was inhibited from leaching by the addition of steel slag was the fractions 1 and 2 arsenic. The amounts of arsenic released in the serial batch leaching test were comparable with levels leached regardless of the addition of steel slag. These results indicate that both soluble calcium and insoluble components of steel slag have different roles in suppressing arsenic leaching from excavated soil. Based on these results, it is suggested that steel slag could be utilized to suppress arsenic release, thus enabling the reuse of excavated soil.

Characteristics of the immobilization process of arsenic depending on the size fraction released from excavated rock/sediment after the addition of immobilization materials

Chemical immobilization is an effective technique to suppress the release of arsenic from naturally arsenic-containing excavated rock/sediment. For designing the chemical immobilization technique, it is important to understand that the immobilization of arsenic depends on the sizes of ionic arsenic and arsenic retained on the colloids and suspended particles that are released from the excavated rock/sediment. Tests on the size fractionation of the arsenic released and the subsequent immobilization were conducted. The total amount of the size fraction of arsenic released from six excavated rock/sediment ranged from 0.16 to 0.75 mg kg^-1. The distributions of size fraction of arsenic released were categorized into three types: the dominant fraction was suspended particle fraction (SP-F) and ionic fraction (I-F), and a compatible amount of SP-F and I-F was included. Steel slag, calcium oxide, and ferrihydrite, which can effectively and stably immobilize ionic arsenic with different mechanisms, decreased the total amounts of the size fraction of arsenic released at 28%-84%, 59%-83%, and 57%-84%, respectively. Ferrihydrite and calcium oxide greatly reduced the I-F and the small and large colloid fractions. The steel slag was effective in reducing the SP-F at >86 %. In most arsenic fractions, the immobilized arsenic was not re-released at <7 %. This study provides the first experimental evidence of the variation in the released arsenic size depending on the excavated rock/sediment. In addition, the size fraction of the arsenic that could be immobilized depended on the immobilizing material. Thus, it is suggested that the combined application of immobilization materials would present a useful approach for immobilizing various released arsenic phases and preventing immobilized arsenic from re-release.

Effects of Environmental Factors on the Leaching and Immobilization Behavior of Arsenic from Mudstone by Laboratory and In Situ Column Experiments

Hydrothermally altered rocks generated from underground/tunnel projects often produce acidic leachate and release heavy metals and toxic metalloids, such as arsenic (As). The adsorption layer and immobilization methods using natural adsorbents or immobilizer as reasonable countermeasures have been proposed. In this study, two sets of column experiments were conducted, of which one was focused on the laboratory columns and other on the in situ columns, to evaluate the effects of column conditions on leaching of As from excavated rocks and on adsorption or immobilization behavior of As by a river sediment (RS) as a natural adsorbent or immobilizer. A bottom adsorption layer consisting of the RS was constructed under the excavated rock layer or a mixing layer of the excavated rock and river sediment was packed in the column. The results showed that no significant trends in the adsorption and immobilization of As by the RS were observed by comparing laboratory and in situ column experiments because the experimental conditions did not influence significant change in the leachate pH which affects As adsorption or immobilization. However, As leaching concentrations of the in situ experiments were higher than those of the laboratory column experiments. In addition, the lower pH, higher Eh and higher coexisting sulfate ions of the leachate were observed for the in situ columns, compared to the results of the laboratory columns. These results indicate that the leaching concentration of As became higher in the in situ columns, resulting in higher oxidation of sulfide minerals in the rock. This may be due to the differences in conditions, such as temperature and water content, which induce the differences in the rate of oxidation of minerals contained in the rock. On the other hand, since the leachate pH affecting As adsorption or immobilization was not influenced significantly, As adsorption or immobilization effect by the RS were effective for both laboratory and in situ column experiments. These results indicate that both in situ and laboratory column experiments are useful in evaluating leaching and adsorption of As by natural adsorbents, despite the fact that the water content which directly affects the rate of oxidation is sensitive to weathering conditions.

Suppression of arsenic release from alkaline excavated rock by calcium dissolved from steel slag

Massive quantities of alkaline rocks are excavated from urban coastal and mountain areas to make underground spaces available for infrastructure projects; however, such excavated rock often releases arsenic. In the present study, arsenic release from the excavated rocks with steel slag was investigated using dialysis and batch leaching tests to understand where arsenic is immobilized and which components in the steel slag suppress arsenic release from the excavated rock. Dialysis test indicated that the addition of steel slag at 10 wt% could suppress arsenic release at a level greater than 66%. The total arsenic content in the steel slag did not increase as compared with that before the test. Sequential extraction analysis indicated that the arsenic released during the dialysis test is mainly derived from arsenic fraction 1 (nonspecifically bound) due to the higher amount of this arsenic fraction in the excavated rock with the steel slag. Moreover, the steel slag extract could suppress arsenic release from the excavated rock and remove the arsenic from aqueous solution. The pH dependence test further indicated that the arsenic immobilized by the steel slag extract was stable under alkaline pH conditions. The levels of arsenic release decreased with increasing calcium release from the steel slag regardless of the type of excavated rock with an alkaline pH and were particularly seen at calcium released > 500 mg kg^-1. These results indicate that the arsenic immobilization could be occurred not on the surface of steel slag, but on the excavated rock, and the calcium dissolved from the steel slag regulates the behavior of arsenic release from the surface of excavated rock. The findings of the present study suggest that the steel slag could be utilized to enable the reuse of excavated sedimentary and metamorphic rock of alkaline pH for the control of arsenic release.