1
|
Casaletto J, Bernier A, McDougall R, Cline MS. Federated Analysis for Privacy-Preserving Data Sharing: A Technical and Legal Primer. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2023; 24:347-368. [PMID: 37253596 PMCID: PMC10846631 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-110122-084756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Continued advances in precision medicine rely on the widespread sharing of data that relate human genetic variation to disease. However, data sharing is severely limited by legal, regulatory, and ethical restrictions that safeguard patient privacy. Federated analysis addresses this problem by transferring the code to the data-providing the technical and legal capability to analyze the data within their secure home environment rather than transferring the data to another institution for analysis. This allows researchers to gain new insights from data that cannot be moved, while respecting patient privacy and the data stewards' legal obligations. Because federated analysis is a technical solution to the legal challenges inherent in data sharing, the technology and policy implications must be evaluated together. Here, we summarize the technical approaches to federated analysis and provide a legal analysis of their policy implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Casaletto
- Genomics Institute, University of California, Santa Cruz, California, USA; ,
| | - Alexander Bernier
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; ,
| | - Robyn McDougall
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; ,
| | - Melissa S Cline
- Genomics Institute, University of California, Santa Cruz, California, USA; ,
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Makhnoon S, Bednar EM, Krause KJ, Peterson SK, Lopez-Olivo MA. Clinical management among individuals with variant of uncertain significance in hereditary cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Genet 2021; 100:119-131. [PMID: 33843052 PMCID: PMC8672382 DOI: 10.1111/cge.13966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Improper medical use of variant of uncertain significance (VUS) remains a concern in hereditary cancer genetic testing. The goal of this study was to assess the association between pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP), VUS, and benign and likely benign (B/LB) genetic test results and cancer-related surgical and screening management. Systematic searches of Medline, Embase, EBSCO CINAHL Plus, and PsycINFO were conducted from 1946 to August 26, 2020. Eligible studies included individuals with cancer genetic test result and surgical or screening management outcomes. We reviewed 885 abstracts and 22 studies that reported relevant surgical and screening outcomes were included. Meta-analysis revealed significantly higher surgical rates among individuals with P/LP than among those with VUS for therapeutic mastectomy with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (OR = 7.35, 95% CI, 4.14-13.64), prophylactic mastectomy (OR = 3.05, 95% CI, 1.5-6.19), and oophorectomy (OR = 6.46, 95% CI, 3.64-11.44). There were no significant differences in therapeutic mastectomy, or breast conservation or lumpectomy rates between individuals with P/LP and VUS, or in any outcomes between patients with VUS and B/LB. Studies evaluating screening outcomes were limited, and results were conflicting. Comprehensive analysis do not indicate that a significant number of individuals with VUS results undergo inappropriate clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sukh Makhnoon
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Erica M. Bednar
- Clinical Cancer Genetics and the Cancer Prevention and Control Platform, Moon Shots Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kate J. Krause
- Research Medical Library, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Susan K. Peterson
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Maria A. Lopez-Olivo
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mighton C, Shickh S, Uleryk E, Pechlivanoglou P, Bombard Y. Clinical and psychological outcomes of receiving a variant of uncertain significance from multigene panel testing or genomic sequencing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Genet Med 2020; 23:22-33. [PMID: 32921787 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-00957-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
This study systematically reviewed and synthesized the literature on psychological and clinical outcomes of receiving a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) from multigene panel testing or genomic sequencing. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched. Two reviewers screened studies and extracted data. Data were synthesized through meta-analysis and meta-aggregation. The search identified 4539 unique studies and 15 were included in the review. Patients with VUS reported higher genetic test-specific concerns on the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) scale than patients with negative results (mean difference 3.73 [95% CI 0.80 to 6.66] P = 0.0126), and lower than patients with positive results (mean difference -7.01 [95% CI -11.31 to -2.71], P = 0.0014). Patients with VUS and patients with negative results were similarly likely to have a change in their clinical management (OR 1.41 [95% CI 0.90 to 2.21], P = 0.182), and less likely to have a change in management than patients with positive results (OR 0.09 [95% CI 0.05 to 0.19], P < 0.0001). Factors that contributed to how patients responded to their VUS included their interpretation of the result and their health-care provider's counseling and recommendations. Review findings suggest there may be a need for practice guidelines or clinical decision support tools for VUS disclosure and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Mighton
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Salma Shickh
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Petros Pechlivanoglou
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Curated multiple sequence alignment for the Adenomatous Polyposis Coli (APC) gene and accuracy of in silico pathogenicity predictions. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0233673. [PMID: 32750050 PMCID: PMC7402488 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Computational algorithms are often used to assess pathogenicity of Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS) that are found in disease-associated genes. Most computational methods include analysis of protein multiple sequence alignments (PMSA), assessing interspecies variation. Careful validation of PMSA-based methods has been done for relatively few genes, partially because creation of curated PMSAs is labor-intensive. We assessed how PMSA-based computational tools predict the effects of the missense changes in the APC gene, in which pathogenic variants cause Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. Most Pathogenic or Likely Pathogenic APC variants are protein-truncating changes. However, public databases now contain thousands of variants reported as missense. We created a curated APC PMSA that contained >3 substitutions/site, which is large enough for statistically robust in silico analysis. The creation of the PMSA was not easily automated, requiring significant querying and computational analysis of protein and genome sequences. Of 1924 missense APC variants in the NCBI ClinVar database, 1800 (93.5%) are reported as VUS. All but two missense variants listed as P/LP occur at canonical splice or Exonic Splice Enhancer sites. Pathogenicity predictions by five computational tools (Align-GVGD, SIFT, PolyPhen2, MAPP, REVEL) differed widely in their predictions of Pathogenic/Likely Pathogenic (range 17.5–75.0%) and Benign/Likely Benign (range 25.0–82.5%) for APC missense variants in ClinVar. When applied to 21 missense variants reported in ClinVar and securely classified as Benign, the five methods ranged in accuracy from 76.2–100%. Computational PMSA-based methods can be an excellent classifier for variants of some hereditary cancer genes. However, there may be characteristics of the APC gene and protein that confound the results of in silico algorithms. A systematic study of these features could greatly improve the automation of alignment-based techniques and the use of predictive algorithms in hereditary cancer genes.
Collapse
|
5
|
Wood ME, Garber JE, Isaacs C, Masood S, Bedrosian I, Tung N, Chun J, Schnabel FR, Arun BK. Genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and the USPSTF recommendations. Breast J 2019; 25:575-577. [PMID: 31280501 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marie E Wood
- Department of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Judy E Garber
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Claudine Isaacs
- Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Shahla Masood
- Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Isabelle Bedrosian
- Department of Surgical Oncology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas
| | - Nadine Tung
- Department of Hematology-Oncology Boston, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer Chun
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New york
| | - Freya R Schnabel
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New york
| | - Banu K Arun
- Department of Medical Oncology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang J, Li W, Shi Y, Huang Y, Sun T, Tang L, Lu Q, Lei Q, Liao N, Jin F, Li H, Huang T, Qian J, Pang D, Wang S, Fan P, Wu X, Lin Y, Qin H, Xu B. Germline mutation landscape of Chinese patients with familial breast/ovarian cancer in a panel of 22 susceptibility genes. Cancer Med 2019; 8:2074-2084. [PMID: 30982232 PMCID: PMC6536923 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Revised: 02/25/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Genetic testing for germline mutations in BRCA1/2 of patients with breast cancer (BC) is part of routine patient care. However, BRCA1/2 mutations account only for a fraction of familial BC. A custom panel of 22 gene sequencing was performed on each patient. Among the 481 female patients, 135 patients were detected to carry pathogenic (P)/likely pathogenic (LP) mutations (28.1%), which corresponded to 12 different cancer predisposition genes [14.6% (70/481) on BRCA1 gene, 5.0% (24/481) on BRCA2 gene, 8.5% (41/481) on non‐BRCA1/2 genes]. Moreover, 24.7% (119/481) of patients had mutation of unknown significance (VUS) in these genes. The most common (8/481) pathogenic mutation is BRCA1 c.5470_5477del, while BRIP1 2392 C > T of patients was detected. All the mutations detected were mainly seen in the homologous recombinant repair pathway. Compared to BRCA2 mutation, BRCA1 mutation is higher in younger female patients (P < 0.01). Some pathogenic mutations were detected in the patients’ familiy members without the past history of tumor and 92 novel mutations were detected (31 on BRCA including 2 P, 16 LP, 13 VUS; 61 on non‐BRCA1/2 including 9 LP, 52 VUS). The detection rate of BRCA1/2 mutations was higher in patients with three or more cancer family members than those with one or two. However, the difference was not statistically different. The results suggest that multigene panel testing can increase mutation detection rate for high‐risk BC patients. Detailed family history can help to categorize new mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiayu Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Weiwei Li
- Top Gene Tech (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China
| | - Yujian Shi
- Top Gene Tech (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China
| | - Yan Huang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Liaoning Cancer Hospital, Shenyang, China
| | - Lili Tang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Qing Lu
- Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan university, Chengdu, China
| | - Qiumo Lei
- Department of Breast, The Third Hospital of Nanchang, Nanchang, China
| | - Ning Liao
- Department of Breast, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Feng Jin
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical university, Shenyang, China
| | - Hui Li
- Department of Breast Surgery, SiChuan Cancer Hospital Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Tao Huang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jun Qian
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First affiliated Hospital of bengbu medical college, Benghu, China
| | - Danmei Pang
- Department of breast cancer oncology, Foshan Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen Unversity, Foshan, China
| | | | - Peizhi Fan
- Department of Breast, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xinhong Wu
- Department of Breast, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Benghu, China
| | - Ying Lin
- Department of Breast, the First affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen Unversity, Guangzhou, China
| | - Haiyan Qin
- Top Gene Tech (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China
| | - Binghe Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To introduce genetic testing as it relates to oncology and nursing. DATA SOURCES Peer-reviewed journals, government web sites and resources, published recommendations, and professional experience as a genetic counselor. CONCLUSION Genetic testing is a major component of oncology health care and with the continued expansion of the application of genetic testing, many patients will have genetic testing throughout their cancer journey. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE To provide supportive care for patients with cancer or at risk for cancer, oncology nurses need to appreciate the many and varied genetic testing platforms and testing strategies. Oncology nurses can be a resource for patients and family members regarding testing options, insurance coverage, and understanding medical management decisions.
Collapse
|
8
|
A functional assay-based procedure to classify mismatch repair gene variants in Lynch syndrome. Genet Med 2018; 21:1486-1496. [PMID: 30504929 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0372-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To enhance classification of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes in the cancer predisposition Lynch syndrome, we developed the cell-free in vitro MMR activity (CIMRA) assay. Here, we calibrate and validate the assay, enabling its integration with in silico and clinical data. METHODS Two sets of previously classified MLH1 and MSH2 variants were selected from a curated MMR gene database, and their biochemical activity determined by the CIMRA assay. The assay was calibrated by regression analysis followed by symmetric cross-validation and Bayesian integration with in silico predictions of pathogenicity. CIMRA assay reproducibility was assessed in four laboratories. RESULTS Concordance between the training runs met our prespecified validation criterion. The CIMRA assay alone correctly classified 65% of variants, with only 3% discordant classification. Bayesian integration with in silico predictions of pathogenicity increased the proportion of correctly classified variants to 87%, without changing the discordance rate. Interlaboratory results were highly reproducible. CONCLUSION The CIMRA assay accurately predicts pathogenic and benign MMR gene variants. Quantitative combination of assay results with in silico analysis correctly classified the majority of variants. Using this calibration, CIMRA assay results can be integrated into the diagnostic algorithm for MMR gene variants.
Collapse
|
9
|
Turner SA, Rao SK, Morgan RH, Vnencak-Jones CL, Wiesner GL. The impact of variant classification on the clinical management of hereditary cancer syndromes. Genet Med 2018; 21:426-430. [PMID: 29875428 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0063-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The reclassification of genetic variants poses a significant challenge for laboratories and clinicians. Variant review has resulted in the reclassification of variants of unknown significance as well as the reclassification of previously established pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants. These reclassifications have the potential to alter the clinical management of patients with hereditary cancer syndromes. METHODS Results were reviewed for 1694 patients seen for hereditary cancer evaluation between August 2012 and May 2017 to determine the frequency and types of variant reclassification. Patients with reclassifications with high potential for impact were monitored for alterations in organ surveillance, prophylactic surgery, and cascade testing. RESULTS One hundred forty-two variants were reclassified representing 124/1694 (7.3%) patients; 11.3% of reclassifications (16/142) had a high potential for clinical impact with 94% (15/16) altering clinical management of patients with 56% (9/16) changing multiple areas of management. CONCLUSION While reclassifications are rare, the impact on clinical management is profound. In many cases, patients with downgraded pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants had years of unnecessary organ surveillance and underwent unneeded surgical intervention. In addition, cascade testing misidentified those at risk for developing cancers, thereby altering the management across generations. The frequency and types of alterations to clinical management highlight the need for timely variant reclassification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott A Turner
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
| | - Smita K Rao
- Vanderbilt Clinical and Translational Hereditary Cancer Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - R Hayes Morgan
- Vanderbilt Clinical and Translational Hereditary Cancer Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Cindy L Vnencak-Jones
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Georgia L Wiesner
- Vanderbilt Clinical and Translational Hereditary Cancer Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rana HQ, Cochrane SR, Hiller E, Akindele RN, Nibecker CM, Svoboda LA, Cronin AM, Garber JE, Lathan CS. A comparison of cancer risk assessment and testing outcomes in patients from underserved vs. tertiary care settings. J Community Genet 2017; 9:233-241. [PMID: 29151150 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-017-0347-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2017] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
In cancer genetics, technological advances (next generation sequencing) and the expansion of genetic test options have resulted in lowered costs and increased access to genetic testing. Despite this, the majority of patients utilizing cancer genetics services lack diversity of gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Through retrospective chart review, we compared outcomes of cancer genetics consultations at a tertiary cancer center and a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) (58 tertiary and 23 FQHC patients) from 2013 to 2015. The two groups differed in race, ethnicity, use of translator services, and type of insurance coverage. There were also significant differences in completeness of family history information, with more missing information about relatives in the FQHC group. In spite of these differences, genetic testing rates among those offered testing were comparable across the two groups with 74% of tertiary patients and 60% of FQHC patients completing testing. Implementation of community-based cancer genetics outreach clinics represents an opportunity to improve access to genetic counseling services, but more research is needed to develop effective counseling models for diverse patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huma Q Rana
- Center for Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave DA 1122, Boston, MA, USA. .,Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - Sarah R Cochrane
- Center for Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave DA 1122, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elaine Hiller
- Center for Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave DA 1122, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ruth N Akindele
- Center for Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave DA 1122, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Callie M Nibecker
- Center for Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave DA 1122, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ludmila A Svoboda
- Center for Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave DA 1122, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Angel M Cronin
- Center for Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave DA 1122, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Judy E Garber
- Center for Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave DA 1122, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Christopher S Lathan
- Center for Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave DA 1122, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Placing negative multi-gene panel results into clinical context. Fam Cancer 2017; 16:595. [DOI: 10.1007/s10689-017-9974-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
12
|
Patients with negative multi-gene panel testing: a back to the future paradox? Fam Cancer 2017; 16:459. [DOI: 10.1007/s10689-017-9967-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|