1
|
Tung N, Ricker C, Messersmith H, Balmaña J, Domchek S, Stoffel EM, Almhanna K, Arun B, Chavarri-Guerra Y, Cohen SA, Cragun D, Crew KD, Hall MJ, Idos G, Lopez G, Pal T, Pirzadeh-Miller S, Pritchard C, Rana HQ, Swami U, Vidal GA. Selection of Germline Genetic Testing Panels in Patients With Cancer: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2400662. [PMID: 38759122 DOI: 10.1200/jco.24.00662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To guide use of multigene panels for germline genetic testing for patients with cancer. METHODS An ASCO Expert Panel convened to develop recommendations on the basis of a systematic review of guidelines, consensus statements, and studies of germline and somatic genetic testing. RESULTS Fifty-two guidelines and consensus statements met eligibility criteria for the primary search; 14 studies were identified for Clinical Question 4. RECOMMENDATIONS Patients should have a family history taken and recorded that includes details of cancers in first- and second-degree relatives and the patient's ethnicity. When more than one gene is relevant based on personal and/or family history, multigene panel testing should be offered. When considering what genes to include in the panel, the minimal panel should include the more strongly recommended genes from Table 1 and may include those less strongly recommended. A broader panel may be ordered when the potential benefits are clearly identified, and the potential harms from uncertain results should be mitigated. Patients who meet criteria for germline genetic testing should be offered germline testing regardless of results from tumor testing. Patients who would not normally be offered germline genetic testing based on personal and/or family history criteria but who have a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant identified by tumor testing in a gene listed in Table 2 under the outlined circumstances should be offered germline testing.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/molecular-testing-and-biomarkers-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Tung
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Sharon, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Banu Arun
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Yanin Chavarri-Guerra
- Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición, Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | | | | | - Gregory Idos
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Ghecemy Lopez
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Tuya Pal
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Sara Pirzadeh-Miller
- Simmons Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | - Umang Swami
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Gregory A Vidal
- The West Cancer Center and Research Institute and The University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Germantown, TN
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rodriguez NJ, Syngal S. Expanding access to genetic testing for pancreatic cancer. Fam Cancer 2024:10.1007/s10689-024-00389-w. [PMID: 38733419 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-024-00389-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
Among individuals with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) 5-10% have a pathogenic germline variant (PGV) in a PDAC susceptibility gene. Guidelines recommend genetic testing among all individuals with PDAC. Additionally, at-risk relatives of PDAC patients benefit from their own genetic education, risk assessment, and testing. Multigene panel testing (MGPT) can identify individuals with inherited cancer risk who can benefit from early cancer surveillance and risk reduction strategies. This manuscript discusses various healthcare delivery models for MGPT including traditional in-person genetic counseling, novel integrated in-person infrastructures, telemedicine genetics care via telephone- or video-visits and direct-to-consumer testing. Barriers and facilitators to care on the individual, provider, and system level are also outlined including specific considerations for historically marginalized communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolette Juliana Rodriguez
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy | Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Instructor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Sapna Syngal
- Center for Cancer Genetics and Prevention Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Gastrointestinal Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Klatte DCF, Starr JS, Clift KE, Hardway HD, van Hooft JE, van Leerdam ME, Potjer TP, Presutti RJ, Riegert-Johnson DL, Wallace MB, Bi Y. Utilization and Outcomes of Multigene Panel Testing in Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. JCO Oncol Pract 2024:OP2300447. [PMID: 38621197 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Guidelines recommend germline genetic testing (GT) for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study aims to evaluate the utilization and outcomes of multigene panel GT in patients with PDAC. METHODS This retrospective, multisite study included patients with PDAC diagnosed between May 2018 and August 2020 at Mayo Clinic Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota. Discussion, uptake, and outcomes of GT were compared before (May 1, 2018-May 1, 2019) and after (August 1, 2019-August 1, 2020) the guideline update, accounting for a transition period. RESULTS The study identified 533 patients with PDAC, with 321 (60.2%) preguideline and 212 (39.8%) postguideline. Patient characteristics did not differ between the preguideline and postguideline periods. GT was discussed in 34.3% (110 of 321) of preguideline and 39.6% (84 of 212) of postguideline patients (odds ratio [OR], 1.26 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.80]) and subsequently performed in 80.9% (89 of 110) of preguideline and 75.0% (63 of 84) of postguideline patients (OR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.75 to 1.61]). Of 152 tested patients, 26 (17.1%) had a pathogenic variant (PV), of whom 17 (11.2%; 17 of 152) were PDAC-associated. Over the entire study period, GT was more likely in younger patients (65 v 70 years; P < .001), those seen by a medical oncologist (82.9% v 69.0%; P < .001), and those surviving more than 12 months from diagnosis (70.4% v 43.4%; P < .001). Demographics and personal/family cancer history were comparable between patients with and without a PDAC PV. CONCLUSION GT remains underutilized despite National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline recommendations. Given the poor prognosis of PDAC and potential implications of GT, efforts to increase utilization are needed to provide surveillance and support to both patients with PDAC and at-risk family members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derk C F Klatte
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jason S Starr
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Kristin E Clift
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Heather D Hardway
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas P Potjer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - R John Presutti
- Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | | | - Michael B Wallace
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Yan Bi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kurian AW, Bedrosian I, Kohlmann WK, Somerfield MR, Robson ME. Germline Testing in Patients With Breast Cancer: ASCO-Society of Surgical Oncology Guideline Q and A. JCO Oncol Pract 2024; 20:466-471. [PMID: 38252903 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Wendy K Kohlmann
- University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - Mark E Robson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dragojlovic N, Borle K, Kopac N, Nisselle A, Nuk J, Jevon M, Friedman JM, Elliott AM, Lynd LD. Workforce Implications of Increased Referrals to Hereditary Cancer Services in Canada: A Scenario-Based Analysis. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:7241-7251. [PMID: 37623006 PMCID: PMC10453026 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30080525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the last decade, utilization of clinical genetics services has grown rapidly, putting increasing pressure on the workforce available to deliver genetic healthcare. To highlight the policy challenges facing Canadian health systems, a needs-based workforce requirements model was developed to determine the number of Canadian patients in 2030 for whom an assessment of hereditary cancer risk would be indicated according to current standards and the numbers of genetic counsellors, clinical geneticists and other physicians with expertise in genetics needed to provide care under a diverse set of scenarios. Our model projects that by 2030, a total of 90 specialist physicians and 326 genetic counsellors (1.7-fold and 1.6-fold increases from 2020, respectively) will be required to provide Canadians with indicated hereditary cancer services if current growth trends and care models remain unchanged. However, if the expansion in eligibility for hereditary cancer assessment accelerates, the need for healthcare providers with expertise in genetics would increase dramatically unless alternative care models are widely adopted. Increasing capacity through service delivery innovation, as well as mainstreaming of cancer genetics care, will be critical to Canadian health systems' ability to meet this challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick Dragojlovic
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada; (N.D.)
| | - Kennedy Borle
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada; (N.D.)
| | - Nicola Kopac
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada; (N.D.)
| | - Amy Nisselle
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Jennifer Nuk
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1J2, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada
| | - Mandy Jevon
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1J2, Canada
| | - Jan M. Friedman
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada
- BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada
| | - Alison M. Elliott
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada
- BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada
- Women’s Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada
| | - Larry D. Lynd
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada; (N.D.)
- Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, Providence Health, Vancouver, BC V6Z IY6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stadler ZK, Schrag D. Genetic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility. JAMA 2023:2805797. [PMID: 37276548 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.9474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Zsofia K Stadler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Associate Editor, JAMA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mighton C, Shickh S, Aguda V, Krishnapillai S, Adi-Wauran E, Bombard Y. From the patient to the population: Use of genomics for population screening. Front Genet 2022; 13:893832. [PMID: 36353115 PMCID: PMC9637971 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.893832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 10/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Genomic medicine is expanding from a focus on diagnosis at the patient level to prevention at the population level given the ongoing under-ascertainment of high-risk and actionable genetic conditions using current strategies, particularly hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), Lynch Syndrome (LS) and familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). The availability of large-scale next-generation sequencing strategies and preventive options for these conditions makes it increasingly feasible to screen pre-symptomatic individuals through public health-based approaches, rather than restricting testing to high-risk groups. This raises anew, and with urgency, questions about the limits of screening as well as the moral authority and capacity to screen for genetic conditions at a population level. We aimed to answer some of these critical questions by using the WHO Wilson and Jungner criteria to guide a synthesis of current evidence on population genomic screening for HBOC, LS, and FH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Mighton
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Salma Shickh
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vernie Aguda
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Centre for Medical Education, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Suvetha Krishnapillai
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ella Adi-Wauran
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|