Acutely decompensated versus acute heart failure: two different entities

High ADMA Is Associated with Worse Health Profile in Heart Failure Patients Hospitalized for Episodes of Acute Decompensation

Background and Objectives: episodes of acute decompensation in chronic heart failure (ADHF), a common health problem for the growing elderly population, pose a significant socio-economic burden on the public health systems. Limited knowledge is available on both the endothelial function in and the cardio-metabolic health profile of old adults hospitalized due to ADHF. This study aimed to investigate the connection between asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA)-a potent inhibitor of nitric oxide-and key health biomarkers in this category of high-risk patients. Materials and Methods: this pilot study included 83 individuals with a known ADHF history who were admitted to the ICU due to acute cardiac decompensation. Selected cardiovascular, metabolic, haemogram, renal, and liver parameters were measured at admission to the ICU. Key renal function indicators (serum creatinine, sodium, and potassium) were determined again at discharge. These parameters were compared between patients stratified by median ADMA (114 ng/mL). Results: high ADMA patients showed a significantly higher incidence of ischemic cardiomyopathy and longer length of hospital stay compared to those with low ADMA subjects. These individuals exhibited significantly higher urea at admission and creatinine at discharge, indicating poorer renal function. Moreover, their lipid profile was less favorable, with significantly elevated levels of total cholesterol and HDL. However, no significant inter-group differences were observed for the other parameters measured. Conclusions: the present findings disclose multidimensional, adverse ADMA-related changes in the health risk profile of patients with chronic heart failure hospitalized due to recurrent decompensation episodes.

Cardiac autonomic plexus neuromodulation for decompensated heart failure: An updated review on the positive inotropic technique based on the DRI2P2S classification

Current pharmacological regimen is unable to improve adverse outcomes such as mortality post hospitalization for Acutely Decompensated Heart Failure (ADHF) patients. Ongoing research is directed towards managing ADHF patients with Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System (CANS) excitatory interventions having long-term prognosis benefits. Recently, a novel treatment coined as Cardiac Pulmonary Nerve Stimulation (CPNS) has reproducibly shown increased inotropy with no change in heart rate. However, there are some potential limitations associated with the neurostimulation of the parasympathetic component of the CANS plexus. The INOVATE-HF trial involved the vagus nerve only. The early termination of the INOVATE-HF trial gave valuable insights into the cardio-protective effect of simultaneously stimulating the sympathetic and parasympathetic components of the CANS plexus done in CPNS. It is essential to individualize the treatment protocol keeping in mind patient selection. Ongoing trials assessing the efficacy and safety of the CPNS technique in ADHF patients shall set the tone for such innovative techniques in times to come.

Hemodynamic Differences between Patients Hospitalized with Acutely Decompensated Chronic Heart Failure and De Novo Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is associated with high mortality, morbidity, and frequent hospitalizations due to acute HF (AHF) and requires immediate diagnosis and individualized therapy. Some differences between acutely decompensated chronic heart failure (ADCHF) and de novo HF (dnHF) patients in terms of clinical profile, comorbidities, and outcomes have been previously identified, but the hemodynamics related to both of these clinical states are still not well recognized.

PURPOSE

To compare patients hospitalized with ADCHF to those with dnHF, with a special emphasis on hemodynamic profiles at admission and changes due to hospital treatment.

METHODS

This study enrolled patients who were at least 18 years old, hospitalized due to AHF (both ADCHF and dnHF), and who underwent detailed assessments at admission and at discharge. The patients' hemodynamic profiles were assessed by impedance cardiography (ICG) and characterized in terms of heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), cardiac index (CI), stroke index (SI), and thoracic fluid content (TFC).

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 102 patients, most of whom were men (76.5%), with a mean left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) of 37.3 ± 14.1%. The dnHF patients were younger than the ADCHF group and more frequently presented with palpitations (p = 0.041) and peripheral hypoperfusion (p = 0.011). In terms of hemodynamics, dnHF was distinguished by higher HR (p = 0.029), diastolic BP (p = 0.029), SVRI (p = 0.013), and TFC (only numeric, p = 0.194) but lower SI (p = 0.043). The effect of hospital treatment on TFC was more pronounced in dnHF than in ADCHF, and this was also true of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and body mass. Some intergroup differences in the hemodynamic profile observed at admission persisted until discharge: higher HR (p = 0.002) and SVRI (trend, p = 0.087) but lower SI (p < 0.001) and CI (p = 0.023) in the dnHF group.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison to ADCHF, dnHF is associated with greater tachycardia, vasoconstriction, depressed cardiac performance, and congestion. Despite more effective diuretic therapy, other unfavorable hemodynamic features may still be present in dnHF patients at discharge.

The impact of the stress hyperglycemia ratio on mortality and rehospitalization rate in patients with acute decompensated heart failure and diabetes

BACKGROUND

The relationship between stress hyperglycemia and long-term prognosis in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) patients is unknown. This study investigated the associations of stress hyperglycemia with mortality and rehospitalization rates among ADHF patients with diabetes.

METHODS

We consecutively enrolled 1904 ADHF patients. Among them, 780 were with diabetes. Stress hyperglycemia was estimated using the stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR), which was calculated by the following formula: SHR = admission blood glucose/[(28.7 × HbA1c%) - 46.7]. All diabetic ADHF subjects were divided into quintiles according to the SHR. The primary endpoint was all-cause death at the 3-year follow-up. The secondary endpoints were cardiovascular (CV) death and heart failure (HF) rehospitalization at the 3-year follow-up. A Cox proportional hazards model and restricted cubic spline analysis were used to elucidate the relationship between the SHR and the endpoints in diabetic ADHF patients. Further analyses were performed to examine the relationships between SHR and the outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

RESULTS

A total of 169 all-cause deaths were recorded during a median follow-up of 3.24 years. Restricted cubic spline analysis suggested a U-shaped association between the SHR and the mortality and rehospitalization rates. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed the lowest mortality in the 2nd quintile (P = 0.0028). Patients categorized in the highest range (5th quintile) of SHR, compared to those in the 2nd quintile, exhibited the greatest susceptibility to all-cause death (with a hazard ratio [HR] of 2.76 and a 95% confidence interval [CI] of 1.63-4.68), CV death (HR 2.81 [95% CI 1.66-4.75]) and the highest rate of HF rehospitalization (HR 1.54 [95% CI 1.03-2.32]). Similarly, patients in the lowest range (1st quintile) of SHR also exhibited significantly increased risks of all-cause death (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.35-4.02) and CV death (HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.35-4.00). Further analyses indicated that the U-shape association between the SHR and mortality remained significant in both HFpEF and HFrEF patients.

CONCLUSION

Both elevated and reduced SHRs indicate an unfavorable long-term prognosis in patients with ADHF and diabetes.

Acute mitral regurgitation with and without acute heart failure

Acute severe mitral regurgitation (MR) is rare, but often leads to cardiogenic shock, pulmonary edema, or both. Most common causes of acute severe MR are chordae tendineae (CT) rupture, papillary muscle (PM) rupture, and infective endocarditis (IE). Mild to moderate MR is often seen in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). CT rupture in patients with floppy mitral valve/mitral valve prolapse is the most common etiology of acute severe MR today. In IE, native or prosthetic valve damage can occur (leaflet perforation, ring detachment, other), as well as CT or PM rupture. Since the introduction of percutaneous revascularization in AMI, the incidence of PM rupture has substantially declined. In acute severe MR, the hemodynamic effects of the large regurgitant volume into the left atrium (LA) during left ventricular (LV) systole, and in turn back into the LV during diastole, are profound as the LV and LA have not had time to adapt to this additional volume. A rapid, but comprehensive evaluation of the patient with acute severe MR is essential in order to define the underline cause and apply appropriate management. Echocardiography with Doppler provides vital information related to the underlying pathology. Coronary arteriography should be performed in patients with an AMI to define coronary anatomy and need for revascularization. In acute severe MR, medical therapy should be used to stabilize the patient before intervention (surgery, transcatheter); mechanical support is often required. Diagnostic and therapeutic steps should be individualized, and a multi-disciplinary team approach should be utilized.

Mortality After the First Hospital Admission for Acute Heart Failure, De Novo Versus Acutely Decompensated Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

It is not clear to date whether a first admission in heart failure (HF) marks a worse evolution in patients not previously diagnosed with HF ("de novo HF") than those already diagnosed as outpatients ("acutely decompensated HF"). The aim of the study was to analyze whether survival in patients admitted for de novo HF differs from the survival in those admitted for a first episode of decompensation but with a previous diagnosis of HF. This study includes an analysis of 1,728 patients admitted for decompensated HF during 9 years. Readmissions and patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% were excluded (finally, 524 patients analyzed). We compared de novo HF (n = 186) in patients not diagnosed with HF, although their structural heart disease was defined, versus acutely decompensated HF (n = 338). The clinical profiles in both groups were similar. The de novo HF group more frequently presented with normal right ventricular function, with less presence of severe tricuspid regurgitation. The probability of survival was low in both groups. Thus, the median life in the de novo HF group was 2.1 years and in the acutely decompensated HF group, 3.5 years. There was a lower probability of long-term survival in the de novo HF group (p = 0.035). The variables associated with mortality were age (p <0.0001), ischemic heart disease (p <0.0001), hypertension (p = 0.009), obesity (p = 0.025), diabetes (p = 0.001), and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide at admission (p <0.0001). A higher glomerular filtration rate was associated with better survival (p = 0.033). De novo HF was associated with a higher mortality than chronic HF with acute decompensation (hazard ratio 1.53, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 2.27, p = 0.036). In conclusion, the first admission for HF decompensation in patients with no previous diagnosis of HF identifies a subgroup of patients with higher long-term mortality.

Device-based therapy for decompensated heart failure: An updated review of devices in development based on the DRI2P2S classification

Congestive heart failure (HF) is a devastating disease leading to prolonged hospitalization, high morbidity and mortality rates, and increased costs. Well-established treatments for decompensated or unstable patients include medications and mechanical cardiac support devices. For acute HF decompensation, new devices are being developed to help relieve symptoms and recover heart and renal function in these patients. A recent device-based classification scheme, collectively classified as DRI2P2S, has been proposed to better describe these new device-based therapies based on their mechanism: dilators (increase venous capacitance), removers (direct removal of sodium and water), inotropes (increase left ventricular contractility), interstitials (accelerate removal of lymph), pushers (increase renal arterial pressure), pullers (decrease renal venous pressure), and selective (selective intrarenal drug infusion). In this review, we describe the new class of medical devices with the most current results reported in preclinical models and clinical trials.

Coexisting Morbidity Burden in Hospitalized Elderly Patients with New-Onset Heart Failure vs Acutely Decompensated Chronic Heart Failure

Coexisting morbidities (CM) are common in patients with heart failure (HF). This study evaluated the CM burden and its clinical significance in elderly hospitalized patients with new-onset (De-novo) HF (n = 84) and acutely decompensated chronic HF (ADCHF) (n = 122). All had HF symptoms associated with: (a) LVEF <50%, or, (b) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50% and NT-proBNP ≥300 pg/mL. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death/HF rehospitalization at 6 months. Age was similar between patients with new-onset HF and ADCHF [82 (12.5) vs 80 (11) years, respectively; P = .549]. The CM burden was high in both groups. However, the number of CM [3 (2) vs 4 (1.75)] and the prevalence of multimorbidity [CM ≥2; 65 (77.4%) vs 108 (88.5%)] were lower in new-onset HF ( P = .016 and P = .035, respectively). The survival probability without the primary endpoint was higher in new-onset HF than in ADCHF ( P = .001) driven by less rehospitalizations ( P = .001). In the total study population significant primary endpoint predictors were red blood cell distribution width (RDW), urea, and coronary artery disease (CAD) prevalence (AUC of the model =.7685), whereas significant death predictors were RDW, urea, and the number of CM (AUC = .7859), all higher in ADCHF. Thus, the higher CM burden in ADCHF than in new-onset HF most likely contributed to the worse outcome.

Impact of NT-proBNP on prognosis of acute decompensated chronic heart failure versus de novo heart failure

BACKGROUND

NT-pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is a powerful prognostic factor for acute heart failure. We investigated whether NT-proBNP levels differ based on the type of heart failure present.

METHODS

Using the Korean Acute Heart Failure Registry, a prospective, multicenter cohort, we categorized patients into two groups: de novo heart failure (DNHF, n = 1617) and acute decompensated chronic heart failure (ADHF, n = 1212). NT-proBNP levels were measured on admission. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcomes were re-hospitalization for heart failure and a composite of all-cause mortality or re-hospitalization for heart failure at 90 days and 1 year.

RESULTS

NT-proBNP levels were significantly lower in patients with DNHF than in those with ADHF (median 4213 vs. 5523 ng/L, p < 0.001). Compared to patients with DNHF, patients with ADHF had a significantly worse prognosis for 1-year all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.46 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.07-1.98], p = 0.017). A higher NT-proBNP level was associated with higher 1-year all-cause mortality for both heart failure types (adjusted HR = 2.00, p = 0.002 in ADHF; adjusted HR = 2.41, p = 0.003 in DNHF). However, all-cause mortality risk was always higher in patients with ADHF than in those with DNHF for any given NT-proBNP level.

CONCLUSION

NT-proBNP levels are an important prognostic factor for both DNHF and ADHF. Notably, patients with ADHF had consistently higher risks than those with DNHF with the same NT-proBNP level for 1-year all-cause mortality.

Clinical Characteristics of De Novo Heart Failure and Acute Decompensated Chronic Heart Failure: Are They Distinctive Phenotypes That Contribute to Different Outcomes?

Heart failure is currently one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality. Patients with heart failure often present with acute symptoms and may have a poor prognosis. Recent evidence shows differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes between de novo heart failure (DNHF) and acute decompensated chronic heart failure (ADCHF). Based on a better understanding of the distinct pathophysiology of these two conditions, new strategies may be considered to treat heart failure patients and improve outcomes. In this review, the authors elaborate distinctions regarding the clinical characteristics and outcomes of DNHF and ADCHF and their respective pathophysiology. Future clinical trials of therapies should address the potentially different phenotypes between DNHF and ADCHF if meaningful discoveries are to be made.

Coexisting Morbidities in Heart Failure: No Robust Interaction with the Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Heart failure (HF) patients often present with multiple coexisting morbidities. In this review, we contend that coexisting morbidities are highly prevalent and clinically important regardless of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

RECENT FINDINGS

Multimorbidity is prevalent in the ambulatory subjects of the community and increases with age. Differences in the prevalence of coexisting morbidities between HF with preserved LVEF (> 50%), mid-range LVEF (40-50%), and reduced LVEF (< 40%) are either not demonstrable or whenever present are small and unrelated to morbidity and mortality. The constellation of coexisting morbidities together with the disease modifiers (age, sex, genes, other) defines the HF phenotype and outcome. There is no robust evidence supporting an interaction in HF patients between the prevalence and clinical significance of coexisting morbidities and the LVEF.