Minimally invasive versus conventional continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation for heart failure: a meta-analysis

Prediction, prevention, and management of right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: A comprehensive review

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly common across the heart failure population. Right ventricular failure (RVF) is a feared complication that can occur in the early post-operative phase or during the outpatient follow-up. Multiple tools are available to the clinician to carefully estimate the individual risk of developing RVF after LVAD implantation. This review will provide a comprehensive overview of available tools for RVF prognostication, including patient-specific and right ventricle (RV)-specific echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters, to provide guidance in patient selection during LVAD candidacy. We also offer a multidisciplinary approach to the management of early RVF, including indications and management of right ventricular assist devices in this setting to provide tools that help managing the failing RV.

Right heart failure after left ventricular assist device: From mechanisms to treatments

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy is a lifesaving option for patients with medical therapy-refractory advanced heart failure. Depending on the definition, 5-44% of people supported with an LVAD develop right heart failure (RHF), which is associated with worse outcomes. The mechanisms related to RHF include patient, surgical, and hemodynamic factors. Despite significant progress in understanding the roles of these factors and improvements in surgical techniques and LVAD technology, this complication is still a substantial cause of morbidity and mortality among LVAD patients. Additionally, specific medical therapies for this complication still are lacking, leaving cardiac transplantation or supportive management as the only options for LVAD patients who develop RHF. While significant effort has been made to create algorithms aimed at stratifying risk for RHF in patients undergoing LVAD implantation, the predictive value of these algorithms has been limited, especially when attempts at external validation have been undertaken. Perhaps one of the reasons for poor performance in external validation is related to differing definitions of RHF in external cohorts. Additionally, most research in this field has focused on RHF occurring in the early phase (i.e., ≤1 month) post LVAD implantation. However, there is emerging recognition of late-onset RHF (i.e., > 1 month post-surgery) as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Late-onset RHF, which likely has a unique physiology and pathogenic mechanisms, remains poorly characterized. In this review of the literature, we will describe the unique right ventricular physiology and changes elicited by LVADs that might cause both early- and late-onset RHF. Finally, we will analyze the currently available treatments for RHF, including mechanical circulatory support options and medical therapies.

Minimally invasive apical cannulation and cannula design for short-term mechanical circulatory support devices

BACKGROUND

Refractory cardiogenic shock is still a major clinical challenge with high mortality rates, although several devices can be used to conquer this event. These devices have different advantages and disadvantages originating from their insertion or cannulation method, therefore many complications can occur during their use. The aim of our study was to develop and create prototypes of a novel minimal invasively insertable, transapical cannula for surgical ventricular assist devices, which uniquely incorporates the inflow and outflow routes for the blood of the patient in itself, therefore it enables the use for only one cannula for patients in cardiogenic shock.

METHODS

To define the available space for the planned cannula in the left ventricle and ascending aorta, we analyzed computed tomography scans of 24 heart failure patients, who were indicated to left ventricular assist device therapy. Parallel to these measurements, hydrodynamical calculations were performed to determine the sizes of the cannulas, which were necessary to provide effective cardiac output.

RESULTS

After the designing steps, we produced prototypes of double-lumened, tube-in-tube apically insertable devices for three different patient groups, which included a separated venous and an arterial part using 3D modelling and printing technology. All the created cannulas are able to provide 5 l/min circulatory support.

CONCLUSION

As a result of our research we created a sizing method based on the specific analysis of computed tomography pictures of end stage heart failure patients and a cannula concept, which can provide effective antegrade flow for patients in cardiogenic shock. We believe the improved version of our tool could have a significant therapeutic role in the future after further development based on animal and in vivo tests.