Postoperative eccentric macular holes after vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling

Anatomical and functional changes after internal limiting membrane peeling

Internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling has been an acceptable step in vitrectomy surgeries for various retinal diseases such as macular hole, chronic macular edema following epiretinal membrane (ERM), and vitreoretinal traction. Despite all the benefits, this procedure has some side effects, which may lead to structural damage and functional vision loss. Light and dye toxicity may induce reversible and irreversible retina damage, which will be observed in postoperative optical coherence tomography scans. Retinal nerve fiber layer damage is attributed to ganglion cell degeneration and axonal transport alteration and dissociated optic nerve fiber layer is due to Müller cell damage. Eccentric MHs and recurrence of previous MHs may also lead to vision loss. Iatrogenic retinal damage may cause structural retinal changes without significant vision loss or progression to choroidal neovascularization. The mechanism of persistent macular edema after membrane peeling is still unclear, but it has been related to tractional trauma and blood-retina barrier damage. The reappearance of ERM is another cause of decreased vision after ILM peeling, which might be secondary to incomplete membrane removal. In glaucoma patients, ILM peeling is associated with significantly worsening the mean deviation on the visual field test after the surgery. We discussed various causes of vision loss and structural changes following ILM peeling. These causes may be attributed to the surgical procedure itself or the associated steps, instruments, and dyes used during the ILM peeling procedure.

Time course of eccentric macular hole formation after pars plana vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane detected by optical coherence tomography

Purpose

This case report aims to describe the detailed time course of eccentric macular hole (MH) formation following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for epiretinal membrane (ERM) treatment, using optical coherence tomography (OCT) images.

Observations

A 60-year-old male patient presented to our hospital with complaints of blurred vision and distortion in his left eye. He was diagnosed with an ERM in the affected eye and subsequently underwent PPV with internal limiting membrane peeling. The patient's initial postoperative course was unremarkable; however, one month later, macular edema worsened, as evidenced by OCT findings. Initially, the edema was observed in both nasal and temporal to the fovea. However, four months postoperatively, the retina fluid in the area nasal to the fovea resolved, and the resolution was delayed in the area temporal to the fovea. At 18 months postoperatively, an eccentric macular hole was detected in the temporal to the fovea. The patient remained asymptomatic, and at the two-year follow-up, the eccentric macular hole demonstrated no signs of enlargement.

Conclusions and Importance

This case demonstrates the progression of an unusual asymptomatic parafoveal full-thickness retinal hole after PPV for ERM treatment. Since the development of this condition may occur over a more extended postoperative period than previously reported, long-term patient monitoring is essential following ERM or MH surgery.

Development of an Eccentric Macular Hole Followed by Reopening of the Original Macular Hole as a Long-term Sequelae of Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Focal Laser Photocoagulation: A Case Report

A macular hole (MH) is a widely known disease among ophthalmologists. Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling is a standard technique for full-thickness MHs. However, the recurrence of MHs is sometimes seen. In addition, an eccentric MH is known to rarely occur after vitrectomy. An eccentric MH has been considered to require no therapeutic intervention because of its lack of increase in size. This study reports a case of two MHs (a recurrent MH and an enlarged eccentric MH) developed after laser photocoagulation around the injured retina caused by ILM peeling at the initial surgery. A 56-year-old woman presented with an idiopathic MH in her left eye and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was decreased to 20/80. She underwent phacoemulsification and vitrectomy combined with posterior hyaloid removal, ILM peeling, and 20% sulfur hexafluoride gas tamponade.  During the ILM peeling, we performed laser photocoagulation around the injured retina within the arcade. The MH was successfully closed and her BCVA was improved to 20/20 one month after surgery. Eight months after surgery, an eccentric MH occurred next to the photocoagulation spots. However, her BCVA remained 20/20; thus, we just followed up on her eye. Six years after surgery, her BCVA was decreased to 20/200. The eccentric MH increased in size and the original MH re-opened. The second vitrectomy was performed, but ILM had been already peeled within the arcade during the previous surgery and a usable sufficient size of ILM which could be auto-transplanted to the holes was not obtained. Thus, free flaps of the posterior lens capsule were harvested and placed within each hole. Two holes were successfully closed and her BCVA improved to 10/20 at three months after the surgery. Laser photocoagulation around the injured retina derived from ILM peeling may be a risk for recurrent MHs. .

Post-vitrectomy delayed retinal breaks in proliferative diabetic retinopathy

PURPOSE

To report a series of cases of post-operative new secondary retinal breaks following vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).

METHODS

This retrospective case series included data of patients diagnosed with post-operative retinal breaks following uneventful vitrectomy surgery for PDR from January 2018 to December 2021.

RESULTS

New post-vitrectomy retinal breaks in PDR were seen in 7% of eyes (n = 10/148 eyes; 10 patients). Age of study patients ranged from 45 to 69 years and there were 8 males. Vitreous surgery was performed for vitreous hemorrhage in six eyes, macular tractional retinal detachment in three eyes and epiretinal membrane in one eye. Tractional fibrovascular proliferation near the retinal break prior to its development was noted either pre- or intra-operatively in 8 eyes. Mean time interval between the vitreous surgery and secondary retinal break development was 6.4 months. Residual fibrous tissue post-surgery adjacent to the break was noted in 4 cases. Sclerosed retinal vessel was noted in 4 eyes and associated inner retinal thinning or schisis in 5 eyes. No retinal detachment was noted in any case. Prophylactic barrage was done in 4 eyes. Last follow-up interval ranged from 4 to 53 months and visual acuity ranged from 6/6 to 6/60. No subretinal fluid, traction or break enlargement was noted at the last visit.

CONCLUSION

Delayed post-operative retinal breaks following vitrectomy are uncommon in PDR eyes. Careful preoperative evaluation of the retinal proliferations, intraoperative dissection of the membranes and regular post-operative reviews are vital in anticipating the development of delayed post-vitrectomy retinal breaks. Observation could be the management strategy for these breaks.

Sudden branch macular artery avulsion during internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular hole: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Macular Holes (MH) are variable thickness openings of the retina that develop in the fovea. This case presents a branch macular artery avulsion during internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for idiopathic macular hole management in an adult patient. The proper management of this complication along with the preventive measures is mentioned.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 65-year-old woman developed a branch macular artery avulsion during ILM peeling for MH. After cataract extraction by phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation and pars plana vitrectomy, during ILM peeling, a multifocal bleeding along a macular artery was noted indicating its avulsion. The intraocular pressure was raised to control hemorrhage, blood remnants were passively aspirated and ILM peeling was kindly completed under adequate visualization.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Branch macular artery avulsion is a potential complication even for experienced surgeons. Proper management of this complication involves the increase of intraocular pressure for hemostasia. If hemostasia and proper visualization are achieved, the surgery could be completed, and if it is not the case, the ILM peeling could be completed in a second procedure. This complication might be avoided by initiating the ILM peeling away from the macular vessels.

CONCLUSION

Branch macular artery avulsion is an intraoperative complication that might be avoided by initiating the ILM peeling away from the macular vessels.

Secondary Macular Holes Post Pars Plana Vitrectomy

Purpose

To report incidence, clinical presentation, and treatment outcome of full-thickness macular hole (FTMHs) diagnosed post pars plana vitrectomy.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the demographics, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), indication for the primary vitrectomy, time to diagnose the secondary FTMH, optical coherence tomographic (OCT) appearance, and treatment outcome of FTMHs, occurring after vitrectomy performed between January 2019 and December 2020.

Results

Six of 523 vitrectomized eyes developed FTMHs, an incidence of 1.1%. There were five females and one male, mean age of 56.5 years (range 37–85). The indication for primary vitrectomy was rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) in three eyes, one eye each for sub internal limiting membrane hemorrhage from a ruptured macroaneurysm, vitreous hemorrhage from polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), and pre-insertion of Ahmed glaucoma drainage device (GDD). FTMHs occurred within one week to three months after vitrectomy (time from primary vitrectomy to the identification of the secondary MH was a mean of 1.03 months). Mean BCVA in all six MH eyes was log MAR 0.9 (Snellen: 6/54). Anatomical closure was achieved after one surgery in three eyes, two surgeries in 1 eye, after photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the PCV eye, and one patient declined surgery. The mean BCVA in the four surgically closed MH eyes improved marginally from log MAR 0.82 (Snellen: 6/38) to log MAR 0.72 (Snellen: 6/30), mean follow-up 7.6 months.

Conclusion

Post-vitrectomy FTMH is rare, and RRD was the commonest indication for initial vitrectomy. We observed that all secondary MHs were closed successfully using the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique with limited improvement in vision. The visual outcome of these secondary MHs trails behind that of idiopathic MHs.

Factors Associated with Anatomic Failure and Hole Reopening after Macular Hole Surgery

A macular hole (MH), particularly an idiopathic macular hole (IMH), is a common cause of central vision loss. Risk factors for nonidiopathic MH include high myopia, cystoid macular edema, inflammation, and trauma. MH is primarily diagnosed using slit-lamp microscopy and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Half of the patients with stage I MHs are treated conservatively and may show spontaneous resolution. The main treatment methods for MHs currently include vitrectomy and stripping of the internal limiting membrane (ILM). However, in some patients, surgery does not lead to anatomical closure. In this review, we summarize the factors influencing the anatomical closure of MHs and analyze the potential underlying mechanisms.

EFFECT OF LASER PHOTOCOAGULATION ON MACULAR EDEMA ASSOCIATED WITH MACULAR HOLES

PURPOSE

To report the outcomes of laser therapy to barricade eccentric full-thickness macular hole with associated cystoid macular edema.

METHODS

We report two patients who developed an eccentric full-thickness macular hole with persistent cystoid macular edema after pars plan vitrectomy with and without internal limiting membrane peel for epiretinal membrane and the results of argon laser therapy.

RESULTS

Barricade argon laser therapy was applied concentric to the full-thickness macular hole. Associated cystoid macular edema was noted to resolve within 1 to 3 months of therapy in both cases.

CONCLUSION

Barricade laser therapy surrounding a macular hole can lead to resolution of associated cystoid macular edema. Pathogenic mechanisms to explain this favorable outcome are discussed.

Assessment of Vascular Changes in Patients after Pars Plana Vitrectomy Surgery Due to Macula-Off Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in the retinal capillary plexuses in patients after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), which is used for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). In this study, we included the results of 114 patients who underwent PPV after total retinal detachment (RRD; retinal detachment group). It should be kept in mind that to qualify for the study group, there was a condition that retinal detachment be only present in one eye, allowing the fellow healthy eye to be used for the control group, and the study, therefore, did not include cases where retinal detachment occurred binocularly. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT-A images were taken at 9 ± 2 months (median 10 months) after the surgery, with the study conducted in the years 2017–2019. OCT was used to examine the external limiting membrane (ELM), central macular thickness (CMT) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), while OCT-angiography (OCT-A) was used to examine the extent of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) in the deep and superficial capillary plexuses. Changes in the FAZ area of the superficial plexus (SCP) between the study and control groups were analyzed over 346 ± 50 days. In our study, we observed changes in the FAZ area between the RRD and control groups in the SCP (203.65 ± 31.69 μm² vs. 215.30 ± 35.82 μm²; p = 0.28733) and DCP (284.79 ± 35.82 µm² vs. 336.84 ± 32.23 µm²; p = 0.00924). Changes in the RNFL thickness between the study and control groups over 346 ± 50 days were as follows: 90.15 μm vs. 82.44 μm; p = 0.19773. Disruption of the external limiting membrane was observed in 78.95% (90 eyes) of the study group. In the control group, it was undamaged, and no integrity disorder was observed. In the RRD, changes occurred in the FAZ of both the SCP and the DCP, which reduced the extent of this zone, an effect that was more pronounced in DCPs. A better understanding of the anatomical and hemodynamic changes taking place in the retina after macula-off RRD might be helpful in answering the question as to why BCVA in these cases is “only” or “as much as” from 0.4 to 0.1, namely, that it might be related to changes in the neurosensory retina after macular peeling.

ATYPICAL MACULAR HOLES

PURPOSE

To study the etiology, clinical features, management options, and visual prognosis in various types of atypical macular holes (MHs).

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed, which focused on the etiopathogenesis of atypical or secondary MHs, their differentiating clinical features, management strategies, and varied clinical outcomes. Idiopathic or age-related, myopic, and traumatic MHs were excluded.

RESULTS

Atypical or secondary MHs arise out of concurrent ocular pathologies (dystrophy, degeneration, or infections) and laser/surgery. The contributing factors may be similar to those responsible for idiopathic or typical MHs, i.e., tangential or anteroposterior vitreofoveal traction or cystoid degeneration. The management is either observation or treatment of the underlying cause. The prognosis depends on the background pathology, duration of disease, and baseline visual acuity governed by the size of MH and morphologic health of underlying RPE and photoreceptors. The closer the morphology of atypical MH is to that of an idiopathic MH, the better the surgical outcome is.

CONCLUSION

With the advancements in retinal imaging, atypical MHs are now more frequently recognized. With increasing understanding of the underlying disease processes, and improvement in investigations and surgical treatment, management of atypical MHs may improve in the future.

Spontaneous closure of secondary eccentric macular holes following vitreoretinal surgery

PURPOSE

To report two cases of secondary eccentric macular holes that developed following vitrectomy and present their outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational case report CASE DESCRIPTION:: A 69-year-old female and a 57-year-old male developed secondary paracentral retinal hole following vitrectomy surgery for stage 4 macular hole and proliferative diabetic retinopathy respectively. In case 1, the hole was left untreated while in case 2, laser photocoagulation was done around the paracentral retinal hole. In both cases, spontaneous closure of the paracentral retinal holes was noted 12-week and 3-week following presentation respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary eccentric retinal holes are extremely rare following vitrectomy. The pathogenesis of MHs in our cases is most consistent with contraction of the residual ILM or preretinal fibrous tissue. Spontaneous closure of small eccentric retinal holes can occur as well which to the best of our knowledge has not yet been reported in literature.

Successful Treatment of a Retinal Detachment Secondary to Multiple Eccentric Macular Holes With Autologous Lens Capsular Flap Transplantation

The authors report a case of a retinal detachment secondary to multiple eccentric macular holes (MEMHs) following an uneventful pars plana vitrectomy and epiretinal membrane peel, successfully treated by autologous lens capsule graft. Anatomical and functional changes were also evaluated. Autologous lens capsule graft is a safe and effective treatment for MEMHs that may improve anatomical and functional results. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2018;49:901-903.].

Multiple extrafoveal macular holes following internal limiting membrane peeling

Objective

Internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling has been the standard of treatment for macular holes. Besides, causing retinal nerve fiber layer surface abnormality, postoperative extrafoveal multiple retinal holes is a rare phenomenon following ILM peeling. We report an unusual complication of eight extrafoveal macular holes occurring following ILM peeling.

Case presentation

A 60-year-old male presented with complaints of decreased and distorted vision in the right eye. He was diagnosed as having epiretinal membrane with lamellar macular hole. He underwent 23G pars plana vitrectomy, brilliant blue assisted ILM peeling and fluid gas exchange. Intraoperatively, ILM was found to be adherent to the underlying neurosensory retina. One month after cataract surgery, he underwent YAG capsulotomy in the right eye. He complained of visual distortion. His fundus evaluation in the right eye showed multiple (eight) extrafoveal retinal holes temporal to the macula clustered together.

Conclusion

This case demonstrated that peeling of ILM, especially when it is adherent to the underlying neurosensory retina, may cause unwanted mechanical trauma to the inner retina. Glial apoptosis and neuronal degeneration may presumably play a role in delayed appearance of multiple (eight) extrafoveal macular holes, which has not been reported earlier.

Eccentric Macular Hole after Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Epiretinal Membrane Without Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling: A Case Report

Introduction

Postoperative eccentric macular hole formation is an uncommon complication after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for the treatment of epiretinal membrane (ERM). We present a case of eccentric macular hole formation after PPV for ERM without ILM peeling.

Case report

A 68-year-old male patient presented with ERM and visual acuity of 6/24 in his left eye. He underwent 23-gauge PPV without ILM peeling for treatment of ERM. One week postoperatively the retina was attached and the epiretinal membrane was successfully removed, while visual acuity was 6/9. One month after PPV, a single eccentric retinal hole below the macula was detected using fundoscopy and subsequently confirmed by optical coherence tomography. At this time the visual acuity was 6/9 and the patient reported no symptoms. No further intervention was attempted and at the 9-month follow-up, the visual acuity and the size of the eccentric macular hole remained stable.

Conclusion

Eccentric macular holes can be developed after PPV even without ILM peeling and are usually managed conservatively by observation.

Eccentric Macular Hole after Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Idiopathic Macular Hole: A Case Report

Introduction

Postoperative eccentric macular hole (MH) formation is an uncommon complication after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for epiretinal membrane or MH treatment. Herein, we present a case of eccentric MH formation after PPV with ILM peeling for MH.

Case Description

A 72-year-old female patient underwent 23-gauge PPV with ILM peeling for idiopathic MH in her right eye. The visual acuity was 6/24 in the right eye. One week postoperatively the retina was attached and the MH seemed to be closed, while visual acuity was 6/12. One month after PPV, there was a single eccentric retinal hole below the macula, which was detected at the fundoscopy and was confirmed by OCT. The visual acuity was 6/9 and the patient referred no symptoms. No further intervention was attempted, and at the 6-month follow-up the visual acuity and the size of the eccentric MH remained stable.

Conclusions

Eccentric MHs can develop after PPV and are usually managed conservatively by observation.