Comparison of visual and refractive results after transepithelial and mechanical photorefractive keratectomy in myopia

Investigation of corneal epithelial thickness and irregularity by optical coherence tomography after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Corneal epithelial healing after refractive surgery is a clinically significant issue, especially for surface ablation procedures, and this can be monitored using optical coherence tomography (OCT).

BACKGROUND

The aim of this work is to investigate the corneal epithelial thickness and irregularity by OCT after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (t-PRK) and analyse its correlation with visual and refractive outcomes.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥18 years with myopia, with or without astigmatism, who underwent t-PRK between May 2020 and August 2021 were included. All participants were subjected to complete ophthalmic examinations and OCT pachymetry at every follow-up visit. Patients were followed up at 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 67 patients (126 eyes) were enrolled in this study. One month postoperatively, spherical equivalent refraction and visual acuity achieved preliminary stability. However, central corneal epithelial thickness (CCET) and standard deviation of the corneal epithelial thickness (SDcet) took 3-6 months to progressive recovery. Patients with higher baseline spherical equivalent refraction were associated with slower epithelial recovery. At every follow-up time point, a significant superior-inferior difference in the minimum corneal epithelial thickness area was observed. Higher stromal haze was correlated with higher spherical equivalent refraction (both baseline and residual) but had no relation with visual outcomes. There was a significant correlation between higher CCET with a better uncorrected distance visual acuity and lower corneal epithelial thickness irregularity.

CONCLUSIONS

CCET and SDcet measured by OCT seem to be a good auxiliary indicator for reflecting the status of corneal wound recovery after t-PRK surgery. However, a well-designed randomised control study is needed to confirm the study results.

Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy: a prospective randomized comparative study between the two-step and the single-step techniques

OBJECTIVES

To assess and compare the six-month outcome of the two-step transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy- photorefractive keratectomy (PTK-PRK) and the single-step transepithelial PRK for myopia and myopic astigmatism.

METHODS

A prospective randomized study. The study enrolled 100 eyes of 50 patients with mild to moderate myopia or myopic astigmatism stratified into two groups, PTK-PRK (n = 50 eyes) and single step PRK (n = 50 eyes). Primary outcome measures were visual acuity and manifest refraction. Secondary outcome measures were epithelial healing duration, post-PRK pain scores and 3-month postoperative haze grading.

RESULTS

Preoperative characteristics were similar in both groups (p value > 0.05). The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) at 1 week, 1 month, 3 and 6 months was significantly better in the single-step PRK group than in the two-step PTK-PRK group (p < 0.001). The mean manifest sphere, cylinder and spherical equivalent showed a significant difference at all follow up visits in favour of the single-step PRK (p value < 0.001). Epithelial healing duration was faster in single-step PRK (p value < 0.001). Pain scores were significantly lower following single-step PRK at 8 h, 1 day, 3 days (p value < 0.001) but were similar at the 7th day. Haze scores showed no statistical difference between the two groups at 3-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The two transepithelial PRK techniques were effective in correcting mild to moderate myopia and myopic astigmatism. However, Single-step transepithelial PRK achieved faster visual recovery, better refractive outcome and shorter epithelial healing time with less post-PRK pain.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY

(Clinical Trials.gov Identifier): NCT04710082.

Comparison of transepithelial and conventional photorefractive keratectomy in myopic and myopic astigmatism patients: a randomized contralateral trial

Background

To assess transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK) in terms of corneal epithelial healing rate, postoperative pain, postoperative discomfort, and visual and refraction outcomes compared to mechanical epithelial debridement PRK (mPRK) and alcohol-assisted PRK (aaPRK).

Methods

In this double-masked, randomized clinical trial, thirty-nine patients underwent tPRK in one eye and mPRK in the fellow eye (arm A), and 33 patients underwent tPRK in one eye and aaPRK in the contralateral eye (arm B). All surgical procedures were done using the Schwind Amaris excimer laser. The area of corneal epithelial defect in all eyes was captured and analyzed using ImageJ software.

Results

Mean epithelial healing time was respectively 3.74 ± 0.82 and 3.59 ± 0.79 days in tPRK versus mPRK (P = 0.21) in arm A, and 3.67 ± 0.92 and 3.67 ± 0.74 days in tPRK versus aaPRK (P = 1.00) in arm B. Accounting for the initial corneal epithelial defect area, the epithelial healing rate was faster in conventional PRK groups compared to tPRK (both P<0.001) in both arms. However, there was no significant difference in safety, efficacy, spherical equivalent refractive accuracy, or corneal haze development between tPRK and conventional PRK groups (all P > 0.05).

Conclusions

All three methods are effective in terms of visual and refractive outcomes. However, although time to complete re-epithelialization was similar with the three methods, the epithelial healing rate was faster in conventional PRK considering the initial corneal epithelial defect area, and the patients experienced less pain and discomfort in the first postoperative day.

Trial registration

IRCT, IRCT20200317046804N1. Retrospectively registered 5 May 2020.

Effect of the Optical Zone Ablation Diameter on Higher Order Aberrations After Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

To study the effect of the optical zone diameter of ablation on higher order aberrations after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy for myopia and myopic astigmatism.

METHODS

In this historical cohort study in 2019, patients were grouped into 7-mm (Gr-1) and 6.5-mm optical zones of ablation (Gr-2). Topographic and higher order aberrations at analysis diameters of 2, 4, and 6 mm were measured before and six months after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy. The changes in the five types of higher order aberrations in the 6.5 mm and 7 mm groups were compared. The pupillary diameter was correlated with the change in the higher order aberrations.

RESULTS

We had 24 eyes of 12 patients in Gr-1 and 80 eyes of 40 patients in Gr-2. The trefoil type of higher order aberrations at 6 mm was significantly more prevalent in Gr-2 than in Gr-1 before surgery (p = 0.038). The change in spherical aberration six months after surgery compared with before was significantly more at 6 mm in the eyes of Gr-2 patients (p = 0.02). For the eyes managed by the 7-mm optical zone of ablation for transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy, the decline in the different types of higher order aberrations was significant. The pupillary diameter was positively correlated with the change in the third-order coma in Gr-2 (Spearman coefficient, p = 0.005). All the eyes had an uncorrected visual acuity of 0.0 LogMAR in Gr-1 and 95% in Gr-2 after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The higher order aberrations six months after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy were similar in eyes managed with 7-mm and 6.5-mm optical zone for ablation. But a lower aberration coefficient in eyes was managed by the 7-mm zone than the 6.5-mm zone of optical ablation at 6-mm analysis diameter.

Efficacy, safety, and predictability of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy: meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and predictability of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) for correcting myopia, astigmatism, and hyperopia.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis of retrospective or prospective studies.

METHODS

Relevant studies were collected from Medline and included when meeting the following predefined criteria: randomized controlled trials, at least 1 of the main outcome measures as efficacy, safety, or predictability, and 1 common TransPRK laser (Schwind Amaris). The parameters estimates and 95% CI were derived from random-effects meta-analysis to account for possible heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Because hyperopia studies did not meet the inclusion criteria, the results are centered on myopia and astigmatism. Sixteen studies with a total of 1924 treated eyes were included in the meta-analysis. The mean efficacy, safety, and predictability had a probability of 94% (CI, 0.86-0.97), 0% (CI, 0.00-0.03), and 89% (CI, 0.82-0.93), respectively. The mean correction index, difference vector, and index of success had a value of 1.01 (CI, 1.01-1.02), 0.20 (CI, 0.06-0.34), and 0.12 (CI, 0.07-0.18), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This summary estimate showed that TransPRK was highly effective, safe, and predictable in correcting myopia and/or astigmatism.

Prognostic factors of visual quality after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in patients with low-to-moderate myopia

Purpose:

The aim of this study was to evaluate visual quality after high-frequency transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (t-PRK) by assessing the relationship between the operational parameters and the first-year postoperative corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs).

Methods:

This was a retrospective study of low-to-moderate myopic eyes treated with t-PRK. The files of 46 low-to-moderate myopic patients (90 eyes; myopia up to −5D) were included in the study. Eyes having a cylindrical refractive error more than 2D and the patients not having completed a 1-year follow-up were excluded from the study. Factors including age, preoperative mean spherical equivalent (MSE), mean keratometry (Km), central corneal thickness (CCT), scotopic pupil, optical zone (OZ), transition zone (TZ), ablation zone (AZ), central ablation depth (CAD), and static cyclotorsion correction (SCC) were analyzed for association with the first-year postoperative corneal HOAs.

Results:

Corneal HOAs were found to be increased postoperatively with a 6-mm pupil (P < 0.05). The increased spherical aberration had a positive correlation with patient age, preoperative MSE, Km, TZ, and CAD, whereas it had a negative relationship with OZ and AZ (P < 0.05). The corneal coma had a significantly positive correlation with preoperative MSE and a significantly negative relationship with OZ (P < .05).

Conclusion:

Postoperatively induced corneal HOAs may affect patients' scotopic vision (night time driving, cinema) when the pupils get larger. The relationship between patient age, preoperative MSE, Km, CAD, TZ, OZ, AZ, and postoperative corneal HOAs underlines the need to consider the effects of these parameters on the final vision quality.

Clinical outcomes of mechanical and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in low myopia with a large ablation zone

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes, vector parameters, and aberrations between mechanical photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and transepithelial PRK in eyes with low myopia.

SETTING

Yonsei University College of Medicine and Eyereum Eye Clinic, Seoul, Korea.

DESIGN

Retrospective, comparative case series.

METHODS

Eighty-four eyes of 84 patients with low myopia (≤2.00 diopters) were treated with mechanical or transepithelial PRK (41 eyes and 43 eyes, respectively), with the application of a large optical zone (OZ). Visual acuity, manifest refraction, slitlamp evaluation, autokeratometry, corneal topography, and the evaluation of corneal wavefront aberrations were measured preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. The efficacy, predictability, vector parameters, corneal aberrations, and safety at 6 months after surgery were compared between the two treatment groups.

RESULTS

The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was comparable, at -0.13 ± 0.05 (SD) and -0.15 ± 0.05, in the mechanical and transepithelial PRK groups, respectively, at 6 months after surgery. The safety and efficacy indices, vector parameters, and aberrometric values were also comparable between the two groups. The OZ was large in both groups (7.09 ± 0.20 mm and 7.12 ± 0.27 mm in the mechanical PRK and transepithelial PRK groups, respectively), and showed no significant difference between groups. The corneal total root-mean-square higher-order aberrations and coma significantly reduced after treatment in both groups, and spherical aberrations significantly decreased after transepithelial PRK.

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanical and transepithelial PRK with a large OZ provided effective and safe outcomes for the correction of low myopia without differences in visual acuity and refractive outcomes between procedures.

Single-step Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in the treatment of mild, moderate, and high myopia: six month results

Background

To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and the refractive outcomes of single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) for the correction of mild, moderate, and high myopia.

Methods

This study consecutively recruited 32 high myopic eyes, 32 mild myopic and 32 moderate myopic eyes. Eyes with myopia that had undergone TransPRK treatment. Pre- and post-operative visual and refractive data, corneal Higher Order Aberration (HOA) as well as safety and efficacy indices were analyzed at 6 months postoperatively.

Results

Six months after TransPRK, the manifest refraction spherical equivalent (SE) was not significantly between high myopia group and moderate myopia group (p = 0.636). No eyes lost ≥2 lines of corrected distant visual acuity (CDVA) in high myopic eyes. The uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was significantly higher in low and moderate myopia groups than the high myopia group (P < 0.001; P = 0.002). The CDVA was not significantly different between moderate and high myopia groups (P = 0.057). There was no significant difference in mean safety index between high myopia group (1.01 ± 0.14) and mild myopia group (1.08 ± 0.15) (P > 0.05). The mean safety index was significantly higher in the moderate myopia group (1.16 ± 0.23) than in the high myopia group (1.01 ± 0.14) (P = 0.002). The efficacy index was significantly higher in the moderate myopia group (1.05 ± 0.20) than in the high myopia group (0.89 ± 0.17) (P = 0.02), and there was no significant difference between the high myopia group (0.89 ± 0.17) and the low myopia group (0.96 ± 0.16) (P = 0.14).

Conclusions

The mean safety index was over 1.0 in the three groups. TransPRK showed acceptable safety and efficacy in the moderate myopic eyes, as well as mild and high myopic eyes. High myopic eyes got very similar refractive results with moderate myopic eyes six months postoperatively. The safety and efficacy indexes were not significantly different between the high myopia group and the low myopia group.