Outcomes of toric IOL implantation guided by iris-registered femtosecond laser capsulotomy markings

Clinical outcomes and rotational stability after implantation of a monofocal toric intraocular lens with textured haptics in normal vs high axial lengths

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcomes and rotational stability after implantation of a toric intraocular lens (IOL) with textured haptics in eyes with normal vs high axial lengths (ALs).

SETTING

Nethradhama Superspeciality Eye Hospital, Bangalore, India.

DESIGN

2-arm, retrospective comparative study.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 114 eyes of 114 patients who underwent femtolaser cataract surgery followed by implantation of the HOYA Vivinex Toric monofocal IOL (Model XY1A-SP), of which 62 and 52 eyes belonged to normal (≤23.9 mm) and high (≥24 mm) AL groups, respectively. 1 week and 3 months postoperatively, clinical outcomes and rotational stability of the toric IOL was evaluated.

RESULTS

3 months postoperatively, % eyes achieving refractive astigmatism accuracy within ≤0.50 diopter, was 100% (n = 62) in the normal vs 94% (n = 49) in the high AL group. All eyes that is, 100% (n = 62) in the normal and 96.15% (n = 50) eyes in the high myopia group were <5 degrees of the intended axis. The mean change in postoperative rotation from 1 week to 3 months was 0.28 ± 0.09 degrees in the normal, and 0.30 ± 1.11 degrees in the high AL group ( P = .80). No significant correlation was observed between AL and white-to-white diameter with 1-week postoperative rotation values. No eye required repositioning of toric IOL for significant misalignment.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences were observed for clinical outcomes and postoperative rotational stability between eyes with normal and high ALs, suggesting excellent rotational stability of the Vivinex Toric IOL with textured haptics in all eyes, irrespective of the preoperative AL measurements.

Comparison of toric intraocular lens alignment between femtosecond laser-assisted capsular marking and digital marking

PURPOSE

To compare the accuracy of toric intraocular lens (IOL) alignment between femtosecond laser-assisted capsular marking and digital marking.

SETTING

Ruhr University Eye Clinic, Bochum, Germany.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical trial.

METHODS

In this study, 28 eyes of 23 patients, who underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with implantation of a toric IOL, were included. Intraoperatively, both femtosecond laser-assisted capsular marking and digital marking were applied simultaneously and compared in every case. The toric IOL was aligned to the capsular markings. Postoperatively, the axis of the capsular markings and toric IOL alignment was examined. Visual acuity and refractive outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Both alignment methods were performed without intraoperative complications in all cases. 25 eyes were included in the final analysis. Misalignment was significantly lower with femtosecond laser-assisted capsular marking than with digital marking (1.71 ± 1.25 degrees vs 2.64 ± 1.70 degrees, P = .016). Deviation from the target axis of the toric IOL was 1.62 ± 1.24 degrees 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively. Postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity was 0.14 ± 0.13 logMAR, and residual astigmatism was 0.3 ± 0.23 diopter (D) with an astigmatism ≤0.5 D in 93% of eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Both methods showed excellent results for the alignment of toric IOLs. However, femtosecond laser-assisted capsular marking was significantly more precise than digital marking and showed good refractive results. In addition, capsular marking offers the possibility to avoid parallax error and evaluating postoperative IOL rotation.

Cataract surgery using two 3D visualization systems: Complication rates, surgical duration & comparison with traditional microscopes

PURPOSE

To compare the complication rates and surgical duration of cataract surgery using two 3D visualization systems and a traditional binocular microscope among experienced and inexperienced surgeons.

METHODS

This retrospective case series included 571 eyes that received cataract surgery using either heads up cataract surgery, via a 3D head mounted system (N = 148-Group 1) or a 3D display screen (N = 338 eyes-Group 2), or traditional binocular microscope (N = 85 eyes-Group 3). The surgical records of consecutive patients who underwent cataract surgery by two groups of surgeons (experienced and inexperienced) were reviewed. Patients in all groups received either femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) or traditional phacoemulsification. Complication rate, as well as duration of cataract surgery were evaluated between all three visualization approaches, between experienced and inexperienced surgeons.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in duration of surgery between all 3 visualization approaches for both experienced and inexperienced surgeons (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the type of surgical technique (manual or FLACS) did not affect the surgical duration for both experienced and inexperienced surgeons (p < 0.05). No intraoperative complications were demonstrated in the current cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of heads up-3D visualization either through a screen or a head mounted platform for cataract surgery seems to offer similar safety and efficiency as the traditional binocular microscope, and both experienced and inexperienced surgeons demonstrate the same outcomes in terms of safety and efficiency.