Interchromosomal effect in carriers of translocations and inversions assessed by preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR)

The Relationship Between Chromosomal Polymorphism and Male Reproductive Abnormalities

This study aims to investigate the association between chromosomal polymorphisms and abnormalities in male reproductive health. Within the period from January 2018 to December 2022, a cohort of 10,827 males seeking fertility services at our reproductive center was selected for inclusion in this study. Peripheral blood chromosomal karyotype analysis was conducted for each participant to identify carriers of chromosomal polymorphisms, who were subsequently categorized into a polymorphism group. Additionally, a control group was constituted by randomly selecting 1,630 patients exhibiting normal chromosomal karyotypes. The study conducted statistical analyses to compare clinical outcomes between the two groups, focusing on infertility, history of spontaneous miscarriage in partners, anomalies in reproductive development, fetal abnormalities, and sperm quality metrics. (1) Among the cohort of 10,827 males, chromosomal polymorphisms were identified in 1,622 participants, yielding a detection rate of 14.98%. This rate is significantly elevated in comparison to the baseline prevalence of 1.77% observed in the general population. (2) The predominant variant among these polymorphisms was related to the Y chromosome, accounting for 1,082 cases (66.71% of the polymorphic findings), corresponding to a detection rate of 9.99%. This is markedly higher than the approximate 0.09% prevalence noted within a normative demographic. (3) Statistical analysis revealed significant disparities between the chromosomal polymorphism group and the control group in several clinical outcomes. Notably, the rates of spontaneous abortion (18.06% vs. 1.35%), fetal anomalies (1.97% vs. 0.25%), and poor sperm quality (41.74% vs. 7.18%) were markedly higher in the polymorphism group. Additionally, incidences of testicular dysgenesis (2.28% vs. 0.92%) and hypogonadism in partners (0.62% vs. 0.37%) also demonstrated significant differences, underscoring the potential reproductive implications of chromosomal polymorphisms. The study establishes a significant link between chromosomal polymorphisms and critical reproductive outcomes, including male infertility, spontaneous miscarriages in partners, fetal anomalies, and reduced sperm quality. These findings highlight the clinical relevance of chromosomal polymorphisms in reproductive health assessments and suggest the necessity for their consideration in the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for male reproductive disorders.

Which factors affect the live birth outcome of the first single euploid frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer in couples with balanced chromosomal translocations?

Objective

The objective of this study is to investigate the factors that influence the live birth rate (LBR) of the first single euploid frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer (FBT) cycles after preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) in couples with balanced chromosomal translocations (BCT).

Design

Single center, retrospective and observational study.

Methods

A total of 336 PGT-SR and the first single euploid FBT cycles between July 2016 and December 2022 were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the live birth outcomes. The parameters of the study population, controlled ovarian stimulation cycles, and FBT cycles were analyzed. Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed to find the factors that affected the LBR.

Results

The percentage of blastocysts at developmental stage Day 5 compared to Day 6 (51.8% vs. 30.8%; P<0.001) and with morphology ≥BB compared to

Conclusion

The developmental stage and morphology of blastocyst affect the live birth outcome of the first single euploid FBT in BCT carriers undergoing PGT-SR.

Collapse

Key Words

• balanced chromosomal translocations
• euploid
• frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer
• live birth
• preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR)

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Female
• Pregnancy
• Retrospective Studies
• Live Birth
• Translocation, Genetic
• Adult
• Embryo Transfer/methods
• Male
• Cryopreservation
• Pregnancy Rate
• Preimplantation Diagnosis/methods
• Birth Rate
• Fertilization in Vitro/methods
• Pregnancy Outcome
• Blastocyst
• Ovulation Induction/methods

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Ruixiao Zhang Reproductive Medicine Center, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China Reproductive Medicine Center, Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China Reproductive Medicine Center, Henan University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Yahui Hu Reproductive Medicine Center, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China Reproductive Medicine Center, Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China Reproductive Medicine Center, Henan University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Chenchen Cui Reproductive Medicine Center, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China Reproductive Medicine Center, Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China Reproductive Medicine Center, Henan University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Cuilian Zhang Reproductive Medicine Center, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China Reproductive Medicine Center, Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China Reproductive Medicine Center, Henan University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China

Collapse

Robust evidence reveals the reliable rate of normal/balanced embryos for identifying reciprocal translocation and Robertsonian translocation carriers

We aimed to evaluate the reliable rate of normal/balanced embryos for reciprocal translocation and Robertsonian translocation carriers and to provide convincing evidence for clinical staff to conduct genetic counselling regarding common structural rearrangements to alleviate patient anxiety. The characteristics of 39,459 embryos that were sourced from unpublished data and literature were analyzed. The samples consisted of 17,536 embryo karyotypes that were not published and 21,923 embryo karyotypes obtained from the literature. Using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases, specific keywords were used to screen the literature for reciprocal translocation and Robertsonian translocation. The ratio of normal/balanced embryos in the overall data was calculated and analyzed, and we grouped the results according to gender to confirm if there were gender differences. We also divided the data into the cleavage stage and blastocyst stage according to the biopsy period to verify if there was a difference in the ratio of normal/balanced embryos. By combining the unpublished data and data derived from the literature, the average rates of normal/balanced embryos for reciprocal translocation and Robertsonian translocation carriers were observed to be 26.96% (7953/29,495) and 41.59% (4144/9964), respectively. Reciprocal translocation and Robertson translocation exhibited higher rates in male carriers than they did in female carriers (49.60% vs. 37.44%; 29.84% vs. 27.67%). Additionally, the data for both translocations exhibited differences in the normal/balanced embryo ratios between the cleavage and blastocyst stages of carriers for both Robertsonian translocation and reciprocal translocation (36.07% vs 43.43%; 24.88% vs 27.67%). The differences between the two location types were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The normal/balanced ratio of embryos in carriers of reciprocal and RobT was higher than the theoretical ratio, and the values ranged from 26.96% to 41.59%. Moreover, the male carriers possessed a higher number of embryos that were normal or balanced. The ratio of normal/balanced embryos in the blastocyst stage was higher than that in the cleavage stage. The results of this study provide a reliable suggestion for future clinic genetic consulting regarding the rate of normal/balanced embryos of reciprocal translocation and Robertsonian translocation carriers.

Detection of chromosome aberrations in 17 054 individuals with fertility problems and their subsequent assisted reproductive technology treatments in Central China

STUDY QUESTION

How do the types and frequency of chromosome aberrations in couples in central China affect fertility and ART treatment?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Men with chromosome aberrations or polymorphisms have an increased risk of semen quality impairment and infertility, and couples affected by reciprocal translocations had a lower pregnancy rate compared with other chromosome aberrations.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Karyotyping is crucial for patients affected by infertility as chromosome aberrations play an important role in the etiology of male infertility. However, the influence of chromosome aberrations and polymorphisms on sperm motility and morphology remains controversial. Data on ART treatment outcomes in infertile couples affected by chromosome aberrations are insufficient.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

We conducted a retrospective study involving 17 054 patients affected by infertility who underwent karyotyping in our center between January 2020 and May 2022.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Karyotyping was performed on 17 054 patients with reproductive failure. All patients were from the central regions of China. The following data were collected from a medical records system using patient identification numbers: couples' ages, history of pregnancy and childbirth, type of infertility, years of infertility, cause of infertility, chromosome karyotypes, semen analysis results, assisted reproductive techniques performed, and treatment outcomes of ART.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The incidence of chromosome aberrations was 2.04%; 2.49% in men and 1.57% in women. By analyzing the relationships between chromosome aberrations/polymorphisms and abnormal semen parameters, we found that there were significantly higher rates of asthenozoospermia, oligospermia, and teratozoospermia among men with Robertsonian translocations and sex chromosomal structural aberrations compared with those with normal karyotypes. Higher rates of asthenozoospermia and teratozoospermia were also observed among men with autosomal reciprocal translocations. The incidence of chromosome aberrations in azoospermic men (13.75%), and in men with cryptozoospermia or severe oligospermia (6.97%) was significantly higher than that in men with mild oligospermia or normospermia (0.88-2.12%). In addition, we found that the progressive movement of sperm is impaired in men with Chromosome 21 polymorphisms compared with men with normal karyotypes (39.46% ± 20.51% vs 48.61% ± 18.76%, P = 0.026). The percentage of morphologically normal forms was lower in the chromosomal polymorphism group than in the normal karyotype group (5.01% ± 2.41% vs 5.59% ± 2.14%, P = 0.001), especially in men with polymorphisms on Chromosome 9 (enlarged Chromosome 9 heterochromatin [9qh+]: 4.48% ± 2.22% vs 5.59% ± 2.14%, P = 0.006; pericentric inversion of Chromosome 9 [inv(9)]: 5.09% ± 3.11% vs 5.59% ± 2.14%, P = 0.008). ART treatment was successful in 36.00% of couples affected by chromosome aberrations. However, couples affected by reciprocal translocations achieved a lower pregnancy rate (24.07%), which may be due to the lower euploidy rates (27.31%) when compared with that in other chromosome aberrations.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

First, although the initial cohort was large, chromosome aberrations were identified in a small number of patients. Second, the observational nature of the study design is limiting. Third, the couples affected by infertility in this study were all outpatients that did not undergo identical comprehensive examinations except for karyotyping, leading to the incomplete collection of medical records. Also, the population included in this study mainly focused on couples affected by infertility, which may not be included in the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommendation on male infertility.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Men with chromosome aberrations or polymorphisms have an increased risk of semen quality impairment and infertility. Constitutional chromosome analysis is recommended for men affected by infertility and severe oligospermia or azoospermia to facilitate early and appropriate guidance for the most suitable treatment. Carriers of chromosome aberrations can achieve acceptable pregnancy outcomes through IVF. However, couples affected by reciprocal translocations have lower pregnancy rates, and more treatment cycles are needed before a successful pregnancy. A possible explanation may be the fewer euploid embryos obtained.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This work was supported by Grant 2021YFC2700603 from the National Key Research & Development Program of China. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Effects of chromosomal translocation characteristics on fertilization and blastocyst development - a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of different translocation characteristics on fertilization rate and blastocyst development in chromosomal translocation patients.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University From January 2017 to December 2022.All couples were diagnosed as reciprocal translocation or Robertsonian translocation by karyotype of peripheral blood lymphocytes test. After adjusting for confounding factors, the effect of chromosomal rearrangement characteristics, such as carrier sex, translocation type, chromosome length and break sites, on fertilization rate and embryo development were analysed separately using multiple linear regression.

RESULTS

In cases of Robertsonian translocation (RobT), the carrier sex plays an independent role in fertilization rate, and the male carriers was lower than that of female carriers (76.16% vs.86.26%, P = 0.009). In reciprocal translocation (RecT), the carrier sex, chromosome types and break sites had no influence on fertilization rate, blastocyst formation rate (P > 0.05). However, patients with human longer chromosomal (chromosomes 1-5) translocation have a lower available blastocyst formation rate (Group AB vs. Group CD: 41.49%vs.46.01%, P = 0.027). For male carriers, the translocation types was an independent factor affecting the fertilization rate, and the RobT was the negative one (B = - 0.075, P = 0 0.009). In female carriers, we did not observe this difference (P = 0.227).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with chromosomal translocation, the fertilization rate may be influenced by carrier sex and translocation type, chromosomes 1-5 translocation may adversely affect the formation of available blastocysts. Break sites have no role in fertilization and blastocyst development.

Retrospective Analysis of Meiotic Segregation Pattern and Reproductive Outcomes in Blastocysts from Robertsonian Preimplantation Genetic Testing Cycles

In this retrospective study, 120 heterozygous Robertsonian translocation carriers undergoing preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) were included, between January 2018 and September 2021. Meiotic segregation patterns of 462 embryos from 51 female carriers and 69 male carriers were analyzed according to chromosome type, carrier's sex, and female age. The proportion of alternate embryos in female carriers was slightly lower than that in male carriers [P < 0.001, odds ratio (OR) = 0.512]. By contrast, no difference was observed among Rob (13;14), Rob (14;21), and rare RobT groups. Stratification analysis of female carriers' age doses showed no significant increase in unbalanced chromosomal abnormalities. Reproductive outcomes of 144 frozen-thawed cycles were analyzed. All 144 blastocysts were transferred, and there were no significant differences in the clinical pregnancy rates per transfer (CPR), miscarriage rates (MR), live birth rates per transfer (LBR), and cumulative live birth rates between female carriers and male carriers. In addition, couples in Rob (13;14), Rob (14;21), and rare RobTs groups had comparative clinical pregnancy rates per transfer (CPR), miscarriage rates (MR), live birth rates per transfer (LBR), and cumulative live birth rates. Our study demonstrated that the meiotic segregation pattern of Robertsonian translocations carriers is associated with the carrier's sex, but not the carrier's translocation type and female age. In addition, the sex of translocation carriers only affects the meiotic segregation pattern but does not influence the subsequent viability of normal embryos and live birth.

Does reciprocal translocation affect the meiotic segregation products of non-translocation chromosomes?

This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the effect of chromosomal reciprocal translocation on meiotic segregation products of non-translocation chromosomes. A total of 744 reciprocal translocation carriers and 875 non-carriers were included in this study. A total of 6,832 blastocysts were biopsied and tested by next-generation sequencing. Blastocysts from the carrier group were classified into five subgroups according to the theoretical segregation pattern of quadrivalent structure. For carrier patients, normal meiotic segregation products of the non-translocation chromosome were classified after excluding the segregation modes of the quadrivalent structure. The proportion of normal non-translocation chromosome meiotic segregation products was similar between the carrier and noncarrier groups (p = 0.69). The generalized Estimation Equation revealed that there was no correlation between reciprocal translocation and meiotic segregation products of non-translocation chromosomes. Moreover, subgroup analyses showed that the segregation modes of quadrivalent structure (p = 0.00) and carrier's gender (p = 0.00) may affect the meiotic segregation products of non-translocation chromosomes. In conclusion, reciprocal translocation does not directly reduce the proportion of normal segregation products of non-translocation chromosomes. The difference among subgroups of different quadrivalent segregation patterns implied that interchromosomal effect may exist but the high incidence of chromosomal abnormalities for reciprocal translocation carriers should not be attributed to interchromosomal effect.

The effect of carrier characteristics and female age on preimplantation genetic testing results of blastocysts from Robertsonian translocation carriers

PURPOSE

To analyze factors affecting segregation and ploidy results from Robertsonian carriers, and determine chromosomes involved impact chromosome stability during meiosis and mitosis.

METHODS

This retrospective study include 928 oocyte retrieval cycles from 763 couples with Robertsonian translocations undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) using next-generation sequencing (NGS) between December 2012 and June 2020.The segregation patterns of the trivalent of 3423 blastocysts were analyzed according to the carrier's sex and age. A total of 1492 couples who received preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) were included as the control group and matched according to maternal age and testing time stage.

RESULTS

A total of 1728 (50.5%) normal/balanced embryos were identified from 3423 embryos diagnosed. The rate of alternate segregation in male Robertsonian translocation carriers was significantly higher than that in female carriers (82.3% vs. 60.0%, P < 0.001). However, the segregation ratio exhibited no difference between young and older carriers. Further, increasing maternal age decreased the proportion of transferable embryo cycle in both female and male carriers. And the ratio of chromosome mosaic from the Robertsonian translocation carrier group was significantly higher than that in the PGT-A control group (1.2% vs. 0.5%, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The meiotic segregation modes were affected by the carrier sex and were independent of the carrier's age. Advanced maternal age decreased the probability of obtaining a normal/balanced embryo. In additional, the Robertsonian translocation chromosome could increase the possibility of chromosome mosaicism during mitosis in blastocysts.

Polymorphic Rearrangements of Human Chromosome 9 and Male Infertility: New Evidence and Impact on Spermatogenesis

Chromosomal polymorphisms are structural variations in chromosomes that define the genomic variance of a species. These alterations are recurrent in the general population, and some of them appear to be more recurrent in the infertile population. Human chromosome 9 is highly heteromorphic, and how its rearrangement affects male fertility remains to be fully investigated. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association between the polymorphic rearrangements of chromosome 9 and male infertility via an Italian cohort of male infertile patients. Cytogenetic analysis was carried out, along with Y microdeletion screening, semen analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and TUNEL assays using spermatic cells. Chromosome 9 rearrangements were observed in six patients: three of them showed a pericentric inversion, while the others showed a polymorphic heterochromatin variant 9qh. Of these, four patients exhibited oligozoospermia associated with teratozoospermia, along with a percentage of aneuploidy in the sperm of above 9%, in particular, an increase in XY disomy. Additionally, high values for sperm DNA fragmentation (≥30%) were observed in two patients. None of them had microdeletions to the AZF loci on chromosome Y. Our results suggest that polymorphic rearrangements of chromosome 9 might be associated with abnormalities in sperm quality due to incorrect spermatogenesis regulation.

Comparing the advantages, disadvantages and diagnostic power of different non-invasive pre-implantation genetic testing: A literature review

To improve embryo transfer success and increase the chances of live birth in assisted reproductive methods, there is a growing demand for the use of pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT). However, the invasive approaches used in PGT have led to in vitrofertilization failure and abortions, increasing anxiety levels for parents. To address this, non-invasive PGT methods have been introduced, such as the detection of DNA in blastocoel fluid of blastocysts and spent culture media (SCM). These methods have proven to be minimally invasive and effective in detecting aneuploidy in the chromosomes of human embryos. This review aims to explore the different approaches to pre-implantation diagnosis, including invasive and non-invasive methods, with a particular focus on non-invasive PGT (niPGT). The search strategy involved gathering data from scientific databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct using relevant keywords. The search was conducted until January 2023. In total, 22 studies have successfully reported the detection and amplification of cell-free DNA in the embryonic SCM. It is important to note that niPGT has some limitations, which include differences in indicators such as cell-free DNA amplification rate, concordance, level of maternal DNA contamination, sensitivity, and specificity between SCM samples and biopsied cells. Therefore, more extensive and detailed research is needed to fully understand niPGT's potential for clinical applications.

Do chromosomal inversion carriers really need preimplantation genetic testing?

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the rates of euploidy, aneuploidy, and mosaicism in preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) cycles from chromosomal inversion carriers. In addition, this work also focused on assessing the impact of some contributors on the incidence of parental originating aneuploidy and mosaicism.

METHODS

This retrospective review enrolled chromosomal inversion carrier couples of whom the females were under 38 years old undergoing PGT-SR at a single academic reproductive center. Subgroups were divided according to the gender of carriers, the inversion type, and the semen parameters of male carriers (male factor infertility (MF) or non-MF). Patient demographics, cycle characteristics, and PGT-SR outcomes were compared among subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 71 PGT-SR cycles from 57 inversion carrier couples were included for analysis. Among the 283 blastocysts, 48.4% were identified as euploidy, 27.9% as aneuploidy, and the remaining 23.7% as mosaicism. Only 32.9% of aneuploid embryos and 1.5% of mosaic embryos involved the parental inversion chromosomes. Notably, the female inversion carriers seemed to produce more parental originating aneuploid embryos than male inversion carriers (45.5% vs 23.9%, p = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

The type of inversion and sperm parameters of male chromosomal inversion carriers did not affect the ploidy status of embryos. The incidence of parental originating aneuploidy in inversion carrier couples is lower than expected. For male chromosomal inversion carriers with normal sperm condition whose female partners are under 38 years old, natural conception combined with prenatal diagnosis could be provided as an option during fertility counseling.

Are ovarian responses and the number of transferable embryos different in females and partners of male balanced translocation carriers?

PURPOSE

To compare ovarian response and the number of transferable embryos between women with balanced autosomal translocations and women whose partners carry the translocation (control group). To investigate the predictive value of metaphase II (MII) oocyte number and biopsied embryo number for gaining at lowest one transferable embryo.

DESIGN

We retrospectively analyzed 1942 preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) cycles of 1505 balanced autosomal translocation couples over 8 years. All cycles were divided into two subgroups: Robertsonian and reciprocal translocations (ROBT and ReBT). Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to ascertain a cutoff of MII oocytes and biopsied embryos as predictors of gaining at lowest one transferable embryo.

RESULT

There were no statistical differences in baseline features or ovarian response indicators regarding the number of retrieved/MII oocytes, E2 level on the day of HCG, and ovarian sensitivity index (OSI) between women with balanced autosomal translocations and control group (P > 0.05). A decreased number of transferable embryos were found in women with balanced autosomal translocations regardless of the type of translocation. The cutoff values for gaining at lowest one transferable embryo are 12.5 MII oocytes and 4.5 biopsied embryos, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Women with balanced autosomal translocations have a normal ovarian response, but fewer transferable embryos, meaning that higher gonadotropin (Gn) doses may be required to increase transferable embryos. When fewer than 12.5 MII oocytes or 4.5 blastocysts are obtained in a PGT-SR cycle, couples should be notified that the likelihood of gaining a transferable embryo is low.

PGT for structural chromosomal rearrangements in 300 couples reveals specific risk factors but an interchromosomal effect is unlikely

RESEARCH QUESTION

What factors affect the proportion of chromosomally balanced embryos in structural rearrangement carriers? Is there any evidence for an interchromosomal effect (ICE)?

DESIGN

Preimplantation genetic testing outcomes of 300 couples (198 reciprocal, 60 Robertsonian, 31 inversion and 11 complex structural rearrangement carriers) were assessed retrospectively. Blastocysts were analysed either by array-comparative genomic hybridization or next-generation sequencing techniques. ICE was investigated using a matched control group and sophisticated statistical measurement of effect size (φ).

RESULTS

300 couples underwent 443 cycles; 1835 embryos were analysed and 23.8% were diagnosed as both normal/balanced and euploid. The overall cumulative clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were 69.5% and 55.8%, respectively. Complex translocations and female age (≥35) were found to be risk factors associated with lower chance of having a transferable embryo (P < 0.001). Based on analysis of 5237 embryos, the cumulative de-novo aneuploidy rate was lower in carriers compared to controls (45.6% versus 53.4%, P < 0.001) but this was a 'negligible' association (φ < 0.1). A further assessment of 117,033 chromosomal pairs revealed a higher individual chromosome error rate in embryos of carriers compared to controls (5.3% versus 4.9%), which was also a 'negligible' association (φ < 0.1), despite a P-value of 0.007.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that rearrangement type, female age and sex of the carrier have significant impacts on the proportion of transferable embryos. Careful examination of structural rearrangement carriers and controls indicated little or no evidence for an ICE. This study helps to provide a statistical model for investigating ICE and an improved personalized reproductive genetics assessment for structural rearrangement carriers.

Identifying Balanced Chromosomal Translocations in Human Embryos by Oxford Nanopore Sequencing and Breakpoints Region Analysis

Background: Balanced chromosomal aberrations, especially balanced translocations, can cause infertility, recurrent miscarriage or having chromosomally defective offspring. Preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangement (PGT-SR) has been widely implemented to improve the clinical outcomes by selecting euploid embryos for transfer, whereas embryos with balanced translocation karyotype were difficult to be distinguished by routine genetic techniques from those with a normal karyotype.

Method: In this present study, we developed a clinically applicable method for reciprocal translocation carriers to reduce the risk of pregnancy loss. In the preclinical phase, we identified reciprocal translocation breakpoints in blood of translocation carriers by long-read Oxford Nanopore sequencing, followed by junction-spanning polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Sanger sequencing. In the clinical phase of embryo diagnosis, aneuploidies and unbalanced translocations were screened by comprehensive chromosomal screening (CCS) with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray, carrier embryos were diagnosed by junction-spanning PCR and family haplotype linkage analysis of the breakpoints region. Amniocentesis and cytogenetic analysis of fetuses in the second trimester were performed after embryo transfer to conform the results diagnosed by the presented method.

Results: All the accurate reciprocal translocation breakpoints were effectively identified by Nanopore sequencing and confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Twelve embryos were biopsied and detected, the results of junction-spanning PCR and haplotype linkage analysis were consistent. In total, 12 biopsied blastocysts diagnosed to be euploid, in which 6 were aneuploid or unbalanced, three blastocysts were identified to be balanced translocation carriers and three to be normal karyotypes. Two euploid embryos were subsequently transferred back to patients and late prenatal karyotype analysis of amniotic fluid cells was performed. The outcomes diagnosed by the current approach were totally consistent with the fetal karyotypes.

Conclusions: In summary, these investigations in our study illustrated that chromosomal reciprocal translocations in embryos can be accurately diagnosed. Long-read Nanopore sequencing and breakpoint analysis contributes to precisely evaluate the genetic risk of disrupted genes, and provides a way of selecting embryos with normal karyotype, especially for couples those without a reference.

Analysis of clinical outcomes and meiotic segregation modes following preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements using aCGH/NGS in couples with balanced chromosome rearrangement

Purpose

To retrospectively evaluate the effectiveness of PGT‐SR by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) or next‐generation sequencing (NGS) in preventing recurrent miscarriages.

Methods

Thirty one couples with balanced translocation who underwent 68 PGT‐SR cycles between 2012 and 2020 were evaluated. A total of 242 blastocysts were biopsied for aCGH or NGS. The genetically transferable blastocysts were transferred in the subsequent frozen‐thawed single embryo transfer cycle.

Results

The genetically transferable blastocyst rate was 21.2% (51/241). Thirty five genetically transferable blastocysts were transferred into the uterine cavity. The clinical pregnancy rate was 57.1% (20/35), and the ongoing pregnancy rate was 100.0% (20/20). The incidence of interchromosomal effect (ICE) was influenced by ovarian stimulation protocol, female age, and carrier's gender, but dependent on the types of balanced translocation carriers. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in meiotic segregation modes in ovarian stimulation protocols and carrier's gender. Interestingly, the incidence of adjacent‐1 segregation in ≧40 years group increased significantly compared with <35 years group.

Conclusions

For the first time in Japan, we show the effectiveness of PGT‐SR using aCGH or NGS, which enables comprehensive analysis of chromosomes, in the prevention of recurrent miscarriages. Furthermore, our results may support better genetic counseling of balanced translocation carriers for PGT‐SR cycles.

Reproductive outcomes in individuals with chromosomal reciprocal translocations

PURPOSE

Patients with reciprocal balanced translocations (RBT) have a risk for recurrent pregnancy losses (RPL), affected child, and infertility. Currently, genetic counseling is based on karyotypes found among the products of conception (POC), although factors influencing the success of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in RBT couples are not established.

METHODS

Cytogenetic results from 261 POC and offspring of the parents (113 women and 90 men) with RBT were evaluated. Chromosome segregation modes and number of euploid embryos were assessed in couples undergoing in vitro fertilization.

RESULTS

Patients with translocations involving an acrocentric chromosome have a higher risk of unbalanced gametes caused by a 3:1 segregation. Female RBT patients have a statistically higher risk of aneuploidy due to an interchromosomal effect. The rate of euploid embryos is low due to meiosis I malsegregation of RBT, meiosis II nondisjunction, additional whole chromosome or segmental aneusomies. RBT patients with RPL have a higher rate of miscarriage of euploid fetuses with RBT.

CONCLUSION

Chromosome-specific factors, female gender, age, and history of RPL are the risk elements influencing pregnancy and in vitro fertilization success in RBT patients. Chromosomal microarray analysis of POC is necessary to provide an accurate and timely diagnosis for patients with adverse reproductive outcomes.

Blastocyst conversion rate and ploidy in patients with structural rearrangements

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to test the hypotheses that compared to IVF cycles undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) with or without testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M), IVF cycles undergoing PGT for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) will have (1) a poorer blastocyst conversion rate and (2) fewer usable blastocysts available for transfer. Secondarily, the study aimed to compare pregnancy outcomes among PGT groups.

PATIENTS

Retrospective cohort study including cycles started from January 1, 2012, to March 30, 2020, with the intent of pursuing PGT-A, PGT-A with PGT-M, and PGT-SR, with trophectoderm biopsy on days 5 or 6.

RESULTS

A total of 658 women underwent 902 cycles, including 607 PGT-A, 216 PGT-A&M, and 79 PGT-SR cycles. When compared with the blastocyst conversion rate for the PGT-A group (59.4%), and after adjustment for patient age, total number of mature oocytes, BMI, and ICSI, there were no significant differences for either the PGT-A&M (69.7%, aRR 1.03, 95% CI 0.96-1.10) or PGT-SR (63.2%, aRR1.04, 95% CI 0.96-1.13) groups. Compared to the PGT-A group, the proportion of usable blastocysts was statistically significantly lower in the PGT-SR group: 35.1% versus 24.4% (aRR 0.57, 95% CI 0.46-0.71) and the PGT-A&M group: 35.1% versus 31.5% (aRR 0.68, 95% CI 0.58-0.81). Implantation, pregnancy, and miscarriage rates were equivalent for all groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients with structural rearrangements have similar blastocyst development but significantly fewer usable blastocysts available for transfer compared to PGT-A testers. Nevertheless, with the transfer of a usable embryo, PGT-SR testers perform as well as those testing for PGT-A.

A Rapid NGS-Based Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Chromosomal Abnormalities in Day-3 Blastomere Biopsy Allows Embryo Transfer Within the Same Treatment Cycle

Nowadays, most of the preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is performed with a strategy of comprehensive chromosome screening and trophectoderm biopsy. Nevertheless, patients with ovarian insufficiency may not have competent blastocysts. In the present study, we aimed to establish the value of multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycle (MALBAC)-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) for PGT in day-3 embryos. A total of 94.3% (1168/1239) of embryos yielded informative results, and the overall embryo euploid rate was 21.9% (256/1168). Overall, 225 embryos were transferred in 169 cycles with a clinical pregnancy rate of 49.1% (83/169). The live birth and implantation rates were 47.3% (80/169) and 44.4% (100/225), respectively. Double embryos transfer showed higher clinical pregnancy and live birth rates compared with single embryo transfer, but the implantation rates were similar (44.2% vs. 44.6%, P > 0.05). The euploid rate for reciprocal translocations (16.1%) was significantly lower than that for Robertsonian translocations (28.0%, P < 0.01) and inversions (28.0%, P < 0.01). However, higher percentages of embryos with de novo abnormalities were observed with Robertsonian translocations (23.3%, P < 0.01) and inversions (30.5%, P < 0.01) than with reciprocal translocations (11.6%). We demonstrated that NGS for PGT on day-3 embryos is an effective clinical application, particularly for patients with a diminished ovarian reserve and limited embryos.

Evaluation of chromosomal abnormalities from preimplantation genetic testing to the reproductive outcomes: a comparison between three different structural rearrangements based on next-generation sequencing

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine factors affecting the chromosome imbalance in blastocysts and reproductive outcomes by a comparison between the reciprocal translocation (REC), inversion (INV), and Robertsonian translocation (ROB) carriers.

METHODS

Couples with one partner carrying translocation or inversion underwent preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural rearrangement (PGT-SR) cycles, including 215 PGT-SR cycles performed in subsequent 164 frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles and 61 prenatal diagnoses of fetuses and 59 normal live birth babies. A total of 899 samples were processed by whole-genome amplification followed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). Karyotype and chromosome microarray analyses were used to confirm the PGT results from the amniotic fluid samples.

RESULTS

A total of 843 blastocysts from 124 REC, 21 INV, and 35 ROB carriers were diagnosed by PGT-SR. The percentage of unbalanced blastocysts was significantly higher in REC than in INV and ROB carriers (64.31% vs. 28.05% vs. 37.02%). Stratification analysis of female carrier age and gonadotropin doses showed no significant increase in unbalanced chromosomal abnormalities in the three groups. Also, the different breakpoints in chromosomal arms did not affect the rate of unbalanced chromosomes in the embryos. Logistic regression indicated blastocyst quality as a statistically significant risk factor associated with unbalanced chromosomal abnormalities from translocation carriers (P < 0.001). The source of abnormalities in the three groups showed significant differences such that the abnormalities in REC mostly originated from parental translocation but the abnormalities in INV were mainly de novo variations. 164 blastocysts were transferred, and there were no significant differences in the clinical pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate. A total of 59 healthy babies were born, and there were no significant differences in the gender ratio and birth height, except the birth weight of boys between INV and ROB groups (P = 0.02). The results of amniocentesis revealed that more fetuses have normal chromosomal karyotypes than balanced carriers, particularly in the REC group.

CONCLUSIONS

Reciprocal translocation carriers have more risk of unbalanced rearrangement, but embryonic chromosome abnormalities of inversion carriers come mainly from de novo variations. This is the first study specifically comparing three different PGT-SRs using the NGS method and evaluating their reproductive outcomes. Our findings will provide the reciprocal translocation, inversion, and Robertsonian translocation carrier couples with more accurate genetic counseling on the reproductive risk of chromosomal imbalance.

The impact of patient, embryo, and translocation characteristics on the ploidy status of young couples undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) by next generation sequencing (NGS)

PURPOSE

To evaluate the factors that affect the incidence of euploid balanced embryos and interchromosomal effect (ICE) in carriers of different structural rearrangements.

METHODS

This retrospective study includes 95 couples with reciprocal translocations (RecT) and 36 couples with Robertsonian translocations (RobT) undergoing Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Structural Rearrangements (PGT-SR) between March 2016 and July 2019. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was the technique used coupled with trophectoderm (TE) biopsy. Only cases with females under 38 years were included. A total of 532 blastocysts were evaluated.

RESULTS

The euploidy rate was similar in RobT when compared with RecT carriers [57/156 (36.5%) vs. 112/376 (29.8%), p = 0.127]. The pure ICE rate was significantly higher in RobT carriers [48/156 (30.8%) vs. 53/376 (14.1%), p < 0.001] than it was in RecT carriers. Female age was the independent factor for the probability of obtaining a euploid embryo in RecT and RobT carriers, and increasing female age decreases the probability of obtaining a euploid embryo. In RecT carriers, no significant differences were observed in euploidy rates, pure ICE, or combined ICE according to the length of the translocated fragment and the chromosome group. However, total ICE was significantly lower when there was a breakpoint in the short chromosome arm together with a breakpoint in the long arm [(44/158 (27.8%) for pq or qp, 51/155 (32.9%) for pp and 30/63 (47.6%) for qq; p = 0.02].

CONCLUSION

The incidence of euploid/balanced blastocysts was similar in both types of translocations. However, there was a significant increase in pure ICE in RobT compared to RecT carriers. In RecT carriers, the presence of the breakpoints in the long arm of the chromosomes involved in the rearrangement resulted in a higher total ICE.

The Interchromosomal Effect: Different Meanings for Different Organisms

The term interchromosomal effect was originally used to describe a change in the distribution of exchange in the presence of an inversion. First characterized in the 1920s by early Drosophila researchers, it has been observed in multiple organisms. Nearly half a century later, the term began to appear in the human genetics literature to describe the hypothesis that parental chromosome differences, such as translocations or inversions, may increase the frequency of meiotic chromosome nondisjunction. Although it remains unclear if chromosome aberrations truly affect the segregation of structurally normal chromosomes in humans, the use of the term interchromosomal effect in this context persists. This article explores the history of the use of the term interchromosomal effect and discusses how chromosomes with structural aberrations are segregated during meiosis.

Sperm chromosome abnormalities in patients with normal karyotype and in translocation carriers: clinical relevance for assisted reproductive technology

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the proportion of chromosomally abnormal spermatozoa in men with a history of reproductive failure, including patients with normal karyotype and carriers of translocations? Should this analysis be included in a clinical setting to define the best treatment options for infertile couples?

DESIGN

Aneuploidy for chromosomes XY, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22 was tested by fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) in 1665 samples from couples with normal karyotype having had at least three previous IVF failures, miscarriages, or both (group-A). A FISH test was also carried out in 76 samples from carriers of translocations (group B) to detect the proportion of spermatozoa with unbalanced rearrangement.

RESULTS

In group A, the lowest incidence of aneuploid sperm cells was found in men with normozoospermia (1.3%, range 0.09-6.31%) compared with men with moderate oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (2.1%, range 0.41-16.6%, P < 0.001), severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (4.7%, range 0.53-30.77, P < 0.001), microepididymal sperm aspiration (3.1%, range 1.19-24.24, P < 0.001) and testicular sperm extraction samples (5.8%, range 1.54-33.3, P < 0.001). In group B, the proportion of spermatozoa with unbalanced rearrangement was significantly higher in reciprocal (63%, range 10.0-87.6%) than in Robertsonian translocations (16%, range 4.3-51.0%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with poor prognosis of term pregnancy tend to generate high proportions of chromosomally abnormal spermatozoa, especially in severe male factor cases. Corresponding frequencies occur at wide ranges; therefore, the FISH test is needed to assess the proportion of spermatozoa with altered chromosome condition. A flowchart, which included the FISH test, was designed to assist clinicians guide couples with poor prognosis of pregnancy, on the most indicated treatment options.

In vitro fertilization outcomes after preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural rearrangements comparing fluorescence in-situ hybridization, microarray comparative genomic hybridization, and next-generation sequencing

Objective

To compare in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes for preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) using various testing platforms.

Design

Retrospective cohort.

Setting

Large academic IVF center.

Patient(s)

Fifty-one balanced translocation carriers undergoing IVF with PGT-SR who completed a total of 91 cycles, including 31 fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), 24 microarray comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), and 36 next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing cycles.

Intervention(s)

PGT-SR.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Primary outcome of live-birth rate and secondary outcomes including implantation rate, clinical loss rate, and percentages of normal or balanced, unbalanced, and aneuploid embryos detected.

Result(s)

There was no statistically significant difference in LBR, though there was a tendency toward a higher LBR for NGS testing (14 of 19, 73.7%) compared with FISH (8 of 18, 44.4%) and aCGH (10 of 20, 50.0%). The implantation rate was statistically significantly higher for NGS (16 of 20, 80.0%) compared with FISH (11 of 25, 44.0%) and aCGH (16 of 30, 53.3%). There was no statistically significant difference in clinical pregnancy losses. There was a lower percentage of normal or balanced embryos with FISH (12.5%) compared with aCGH (23.7%) and with NGS (20.7%).

Conclusion(s)

This is the first report of PGT-SR outcomes for translocation carriers directly comparing PGT-SR using FISH, aCGH, and NGS. Our findings suggest an improvement in pregnancy outcomes parallel to the advancement in technology and are reassuring for continued use of NGS for this population.

Investigation of the interchromosomal effects in male carriers with structural chromosomal abnormalities using FISH

OBJECTIVE

The interchromosomal effect (ICE) refers to the uncertainty during meiosis where the rearrangement of the chromosomes affects the segregation of the chromosomes that are not involved in the structural chromosomal abnormalities. The aim of this study is to investigate the existence of ICE in the sperm nuclei of the males who have structural chromosomal abnormalities.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Nine male individuals who are the carriers of the structural chromosomal abnormalities (patient group) and 14 male individuals who did not have any chromosomal abnormalities (control group) were diagnosed by the classical cytogenetic analysis. The aneuploidy of chromosomes 2, 3, 12, 13, 17, 18, 21, X, and Y in the sperm nuclei was investigated using the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method in these individuals. The patient group included 5 Robertsonian translocation (ROB) carriers, 3 reciprocal translocation (RCP) carriers, and 1 inversion carrier.

RESULTS

A total of 51921 sperm nuclei were analyzed (19484 from the patient group and 32437 from the control group). While ICE was determined in 4 of 5 patients who were the carriers of ROB and an inversion carrier patient, it was not determined in the patient carrier of RCP.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that there is ICE in the male carriers with a structural chromosomal abnormality, which appears to be translocation, breakpoint, chromosome, and patient dependent.

Analysis of the Number of Euploid Embryos in Preimplantation Genetic Testing Cycles With Early-Follicular Phase Long-Acting Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Long Protocol

Studies have shown that early-follicular phase long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist long protocol (EFLL), a popular controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocol widely used in China, leads to higher rates of implantation and clinical pregnancy, as well as lower rates of spontaneous abortion and ectopic pregnancy in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment. However, the impact of EFLL on euploid embryos and its underlying mechanisms remain unclear. To address these gaps of knowledge, we conducted a retrospective comparative study of 310 preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles with a total of 1,541 embryos using the EFLL protocol or midluteal short-acting GnRH agonist long protocol (MLSL). Patients were matched by PGT subtype [aneuploidies (PGT-A) vs. PGT for chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR)], age (±2 years), and body mass index (±1 kg/m²). For PGT-A, there was no significant difference in the number of euploid embryos (1.80 ± 1.47 for EFLL vs. 1.84 ± 2.03 for MLSL, p > 0.05) or the rate of euploidy (44.6 vs. 36.9%, p > 0.05). For PGT-SR, the number of euploid embryos in the EFLL group was significantly higher than that in the MLSL group (1.76 ± 1.54 vs. 1.21 ± 1.24, p < 0.05). A higher euploidy rate was also observed with the EFLL protocol compared with that obtained in MLSL (31.9 vs. 25.7%), although the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Compared with the MLSL protocol, more euploid embryos were achieved when using the EFLL protocol in PGT-SR, demonstrating the value in PGT-SR. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first one to compare embryonic outcomes between EFLL and MLSL, providing key insights into the clinical application of EFLL in PGT cycles. In the light of the limited sample size of our study, we recommend that these questions be explored using a larger prospective study.