Comparison of perinatal outcomes between spontaneous vs. commissioned cycles in gestational carriers for single and same-sex male intended parents

Reproduction as a window to future health in women

Cultivating awareness for reproduction as a window to future health presents an opportunity for early identification and modification of risk factors that can affect both individual and population-level morbidity and mortality. Infertility could serve as both a window into future health as well as a pathway to future pathology. The underlying mechanisms of infertility may share common pathways with long-term risk for health and well-being. Making this identification early in the disease process may improve opportunities for intervention, and deepen our understanding of long-term risk. Additionally, fertility treatments may increase individual risk. Only by making these associations and designing studies to understand how disease and treatment risk impact health can we truly fulfill our goal of building healthy families. The aim of this review is to discuss the short-term impact of fertility challenges and treatment, long-term associations of infertility with morbidity and mortality, and the role of parity in modifying these risk associations.

Pathways to fatherhood: clinical experiences with assisted reproductive technology in single and coupled intended fathers

Objective

To explore the cycle characteristics and outcomes of single and coupled intended fathers (SCIFs) using assisted reproductive technology.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

Multicenter, fertility practices from 2016 to 2020.

Patients

In this study, cycles among SCIFs with access to fertility coverage from 2016 to 2020 were included.

Interventions

None.

Main Outcome Measures

Our primary outcome was live birth rate. The secondary outcomes included the number of embryos transferred, miscarriage rate, and incidence of multifetal birth.

Results

Five single and 39 coupled intended fathers completed an in vitro fertilization cycle with a majority using egg donation and an agency-based gestational carrier (69.7%, 83/119). In most couples, both partners wanted to serve as the sperm source (64.4%, 29/45). The vast majority (97.7%, 43/44) also used preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. Among the embryo transfer (ET) cycles (n = 27), most consisted of a single euploid ET (74.07%, 20/27), whereas the remaining consisted of a double euploid ET (25.92%, 7/27). The SCIFs had high rates of success, with a live birth rate of 85.19% (23/27). A mean of 1.26 ± 0.44 embryos were transferred, with a majority resulting in singleton birth (70.37%, 19/27).

Conclusions

Our study of SCIFs using assisted reproductive technology in the United States demonstrates that this population shares similar preferences for sperm source and the use of preimplantation genetic testing. Clinical outcomes suggest that this population is successful at achieving a live birth when using egg donation and a gestational carrier.

Medical and mental health implications of gestational surrogacy

Gestational surrogacy in the United States has quadrupled since 1999, but to date, only a few states explicitly permit compensated gestational surrogacy. Current legal prohibitions are often influenced by outdated and stereotyped understandings of surrogacy. It is increasingly important to understand the current literature about the medical and mental health impacts of surrogacy and how state legislatures have addressed compensated gestational surrogacy in recent years. Based on this review, we found no evidence of substantial adverse medical or psychological outcomes among women who are gestational carriers or among the children they give birth to. The literature suggests that gestational surrogacy is a safe and increasingly popular option for families as long as rigorous screening and medical, psychological, and social supports are equitably provided. As states move to responsibly legalize and regulate gestational surrogacy, there is a continued need for further longitudinal studies on the health and psychological outcomes of gestational surrogacy.

Is a Surrogate Pregnancy a High-Risk Pregnancy?

Importance

As assisted reproductive technology has advanced, there has been an increase in gestational carriers/surrogate pregnancies. Information is needed to determine if these pregnancies are high-risk pregnancies and should be managed by maternal fetal medicine or if they are not high risk and should be cared for by residency-trained obstetricians and gynecologists.

Objective

In this review of the literature, we explore whether surrogate pregnancies should be classified as high-risk pregnancies and managed by subspecialists.

Evidence Acquisition, Results

Our literature search discovered 28 relevant studies that evaluated surrogate pregnancy and pregnancy complications/outcomes. We learned that the overall risk by using artificial reproductive technology and risks for hypertension, preterm delivery, cesarean delivery, low birth weight neonate, fetal anomalies, and stillbirth did not seem to increase maternal/perinatal risk to the level where a subspecialist was required for the inclusive management of a gestational surrogate. Given that the ideal gestational carrier is healthy, has previously had a term pregnancy, has a single embryo implanted, and has had no more than 3 prior cesarean deliveries, these pregnancies should be lower-risk pregnancies.

Conclusions

We recommend that close monitoring and high index of suspicion should be maintained for complications, but care for the surrogate pregnancy can be accomplished by a residency-trained obstetrician-gynecologist.

Relevance

An uncomplicated surrogate pregnancy can be managed by a residency-trained obstetrician-gynecologist and does not need to be managed by high-risk obstetric subspecialists.

Gestational carrier pregnancy outcomes from frozen embryo transfer depending on the number of embryos transferred and preimplantation genetic testing: a retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare gestational age, birth weight (BW), and live birth rates in gestational carriers (GC) after the transfer of 1 or 2 frozen embryo(s) with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), with the understanding that several social and economic factors may motivate intended parents to request the transfer of 2 embryos and/or PGT-A when using a GC.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study SETTING: An assisted reproductive technology practice.

PATIENT(S)

All frozen blastocyst transfers with GCs from 2009-2018.

INTERVENTION(S)

One or 2 embryo frozen embryo transfers with and without PGT-A.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Live birth, preterm birth, and low BW.

RESULTS

A total of 583 frozen embryo transfer cycles with vitrified high-grade blastocysts (grade BB or higher) to GCs were analyzed. Although the live birth rate was significantly greater in frozen embryo transfers with 2 embryos, after single embryo transfer (SET), the mean gestational age and BW of live births were statistically significantly greater than those of double embryo transfer (DET). The rate of multiple births was 1.9% for SET compared to 20.0% for DET per transfer. Only 3.8% of live births from SET experienced low BW and 0.6% had very low or extremely low BW. By comparison, 12.5% of DET live births were low BW and 5% were very low BW. After SET, 13.4% of live births were preterm, compared with 40% in DET. The analysis also included a total of 194 transfers with PGT-A compared to 389 cycles without. Overall, live births per transfer were not significantly different between these latter 2 subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Frozen embryo transfer cycles in GCs with DET were associated with more preterm births and lower birth weights compared with those of SET. Intended parents and GCs should be counseled that DET is associated with greater risks of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes, which mitigates higher live birth rates. The use of PGT-A did not appear to improve the live birth rate.