Ventricular reverse remodeling and 6-month outcomes in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy: analysis of the MIRACLE study

Hypertension Related Co-Morbidities and Complications in Women of Sub-Saharan Africa: A Brief Review

Hypertension is the leading cause of cardiovascular disease in women, and sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries have some of the highest rates of hypertension in the world. Expanding knowledge of causes, management, and awareness of hypertension and its co-morbidities worldwide is an effective strategy to mitigate its harms, decrease morbidities and mortality, and improve individual quality of life. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDPs) are a particularly important subset of hypertension, as pregnancy is a major stress test of the cardiovascular system and can be the first instance in which cardiovascular disease is clinically apparent. In SSA, women experience a higher incidence of HDP compared with other African regions. However, the region has yet to adopt treatment and preventative strategies for HDP. This delay stems from insufficient awareness, lack of clinical screening for hypertension, and lack of prevention programs. In this brief literature review, we will address the long-term consequences of hypertension and HDP in women. We evaluate the effects of uncontrolled hypertension in SSA by including research on heart disease, stroke, kidney disease, peripheral arterial disease, and HDP. Limitations exist in the number of studies from SSA; therefore, we will use data from countries across the globe, comparing and contrasting approaches in similar and dissimilar populations. Our review highlights an urgent need to prioritize public health, clinical, and bench research to discover cost-effective preventative and treatment strategies that will improve the lives of women living with hypertension in SSA.

Cardiac magnetic resonance defines mechanisms of sex-based differences in outcomes following cardiac resynchronization therapy

Background

Mechanisms of sex-based differences in outcomes following cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are poorly understood.

Objective

To use cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) to define mechanisms of sex-based differences in outcomes after CRT and describe distinct CMR-based phenotypes of CRT candidates based on sex and non-ischemic/ischemic cardiomyopathy type.

Materials and methods

In a prospective study, sex-based differences in three short-term CRT response measures [fractional change in left ventricular end-systolic volume index 6 months after CRT (LVESVI-FC), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) 6 months after CRT, change in peak VO₂ 6 months after CRT], and long-term survival were evaluated with respect to 39 baseline parameters from CMR, exercise testing, laboratory testing, electrocardiograms, comorbid conditions, and other sources. CMR was also used to quantify the degree of left-ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by deriving the circumferential uniformity ratio estimate (CURE-SVD) parameter from displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE) strain imaging. Statistical methods included multivariable linear regression with evaluation of interaction effects associated with sex and cardiomyopathy type (ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy) and survival analysis.

Results

Among 200 patients, the 54 female patients (27%) pre-CRT had a smaller CMR-based LVEDVI (p = 0.04), more mechanical dyssynchrony based on the validated CMR CURE-SVD parameter (p = 0.04), a lower frequency of both late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (p < 0.0001), a greater RVEF (p = 0.02), and a greater frequency of LBBB (p = 0.01). After categorization of patients into four groups based on cardiomyopathy type (ischemic/non-ischemic cardiomyopathy) and sex, female patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy had the lowest CURE-SVD (p = 0.003), the lowest pre-CRT BNP levels (p = 0.01), the lowest post-CRT BNP levels (p = 0.05), and the most favorable LVESVI-FC (p = 0.001). Overall, female patients had better 3-year survival before adjustment for cardiomyopathy type (p = 0.007, HR = 0.45) and after adjustment for cardiomyopathy type (p = 0.009, HR = 0.67).

Conclusion

CMR identifies distinct phenotypes of female CRT patients with non-ischemic and ischemic cardiomyopathy relative to male patients stratified by cardiomyopathy type. The more favorable short-term response and long-term survival outcomes in female heart failure patients with CRT were associated with lower indexed CMR-based LV volumes, decreased presence of scar associated with prior myocardial infarction and ICM, and greater CMR-based dyssynchrony with the CURE-SVD.

Treatment of cardiac resynchronization therapy non-responders: current approaches and new frontiers

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has developed into a very effective technology for patients with decreased systolic function and has substantially improved patients' clinical course. However, non-responsiveness to CRT, described as lack of reverse cardiac chamber remodeling, leading to lack to improve symptoms, heart failure hospitalizations or mortality, is common, rather unpredictable, and not fully understood.

AREAS COVERED

This article aims to discuss key factors that are impacting CRT response; from patient selection to LV lead position, to structured follow-up in CRT clinics. Secondly, common causes and interventions for CRT non-responsiveness are discussed. Next, insight is given into technologies representing new and feasible interventions as well as pacing strategies in this group of patients that remain challenging to treat. Finally, an outlook is given into future scientific development.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the progress that has been made, CRT non-response remains a significant and complex problem. Patient management in interdisciplinary teams including heart failure, imaging, and cardiac arrhythmia experts appears critical as complexity is increasing and CRT non-response often is a multifactorial problem. This will allow optimization of medical therapy, the use of new integrated sensor technologies and telemedicine to ultimately optimize outcomes for all patients in need of CRT.

Inequality between women and men in ICD implantation

Background

The impact of sex on ICD implantation practice and survival remain a topic of controversy. To assess sex-specific differences in ICD implantation practice we compared clinical characteristics and survival in women and men.

Methods

From a nationwide registry, all new ICD implantations performed between 01/02/2010 and 31/01/2019 in Belgian patients were analyzed retrospectively. Baseline characteristics and survival rates were compared between sexes. To identify predictors of mortality, multivariable Cox regression was performed.

Results

Only 3096 (20.9%) of 14,787 ICD implantations were performed in women. Within each type of underlying cardiomyopathy, the proportion women were lower than men. The main indication in men was ischemic vs dilated cardiomyopathy in women. Women were overall younger (59.1 ± 15.1 vs 62.6 ± 13.1 years; p < 0.001) and had less comorbidities except for oncological disease. More women functioned in NYHA-class III (33.6% vs 27.9%; p < 0.001) and had a QRS > 150 ms (29.4% vs 24.3%; p < 0.001), consistent with a higher use of CRT-D devices (31.7% vs 25.1%; p < 0.001). Women had more complications, reflected by the need to more re-interventions within 1 year (4.3% vs 2.7%, p < 0.001). After correction for covariates, sex-category was not a significant predictor of mortality (p = 0.055).

Conclusion

There is a significant sex-disparity in ICD implantation rates, not fully explained by epidemiological differences in the prevalence of cardiomyopathies, which could imply an undertreatment of women. Women differ from men in baseline characteristics at implantation suggesting a selection bias. Further research is necessary to evaluate if women receive equal sudden cardiac death prevention.

Sex-Specific Differences in Ventricular Remodeling and Response After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

In this study, we investigated the baseline characteristics and "trajectories" of clinical response in men and women after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation. Although women enjoy improved echocardiographic response after CRT compared with men, the kinetics of this response and its relation to functional performance and outcomes are less clear. We identified 592 patients who underwent CRT implantation at our center between 2004 and 2017 and were serially followed in a multidisciplinary clinic. Longitudinal linear mixed effects regression for cardiac response was specified, including interaction terms between time after CRT and sex , and Cox regression models were used to assess differences in all-cause mortality by gender after CRT. Women in our cohort were younger than men, had less frequent ischemic etiology of heart failure (24% vs 60% in men), a shorter QRS (151 vs 161 ms) and more frequent left bundle branch block (77% vs 52%) at baseline. Women had a greater improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction that was evident starting at approximately 1-month after CRT. We did not observe effect modification by gender in New York Heart Association class or 6-minute walk distance after CRT. Although women had improved mortality after CRT, after adjustment for potential confounders, gender was not associated with mortality after CRT. In conclusion, women were more likely to have CRT implantation for left bundle branch block and exhibited improved echocardiographic but not functional response within the first year after CRT. Clinical outcomes after CRT were not associated with gender in adjusted analysis.

The importance of early evaluation after cardiac resynchronization therapy to redefine response: Pooled individual patient analysis from 5 prospective studies

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces mortality and improves outcomes in appropriately selected patients with heart failure (HF); however, response may vary.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to correlate 6-month CRT response assessed by clinical composite score (CCS) and left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVi) with longer-term mortality and HF hospitalizations.

METHODS

Individual patient data from 5 prospective CRT studies-MIRACLE, MIRACLE ICD, InSync III Marquis, PROSPECT, and Adaptive CRT-were pooled. Classification of CRT response status using CCS and LVESVi were made at 6 months. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess time to mortality. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to compute hazard ratios (HRs) for the 3 levels of CRT response: improved, stabilized, and worsened. Adjusted models controlled for baseline factors known to influence both CRT response and mortality. HF-related hospitalization was compared between CRT response categories using incidence rate ratios.

RESULTS

Among a total of 1603 patients, 1426 and 1165 were evaluated in the CCS and LVESVi outcome assessments, respectively. Mortality was significantly lower for patients in the improved (CCS: HR 0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-0.31; LVESVi: HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.27-0.60) and stabilized (CCS: HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.24-0.61; LVESVi: HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.25-0.68) groups than in the worsened group for both measures after adjusting for potential confounders.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a worsened CRT response status have a high mortality rate and HF hospitalizations. Stabilized patients have a more favorable prognosis than do worsened patients and thus should not be considered CRT nonresponders.

Aetiology of Heart Failure, Rather than Sex, Determines Reverse LV Remodelling Response to CRT

Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established therapy for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Women appear to respond differently to CRT, yet it remains unclear whether this is inherent to the female sex itself, or due to other patient characteristics. In this study, we aimed to investigate sex differences in response to CRT. Methods: This is a post-hoc analysis of a prospective, multicenter study (MARC) in the Netherlands, studying HFrEF patients with an indication for CRT according to the guidelines (n = 240). Primary outcome measures are left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) at 6 months follow-up. Results were validated in an independent retrospective Belgian cohort (n = 818). Results: In the MARC cohort 39% were women, and in the Belgian cohort 32% were women. In the MARC cohort, 70% of the women were responders (defined as >15% decrease in LVESV) at 6 months, compared to 55% of men (p = 0.040) (79% vs. 67% in the Belgian cohort, p = 0.002). Women showed a greater decrease in LVESV %, LVESV indexed to body surface area (BSA) %, and increase in LVEF (all p < 0.05). In regression analysis, after adjustment for BSA and etiology, female sex was no longer associated with change in LVESV % and LVESV indexed to BSA % and LVEF % (p > 0.05 for all). Results were comparable in the Belgian cohort. Conclusions: Women showed a greater echocardiographic response to CRT at 6 months follow-up. However, after adjustment for BSA and ischemic etiology, no differences were found in LV-function measures or survival, suggesting that non-ischemic etiology is responsible for greater response rates in women treated with CRT.

The Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers Is Associated with the Recovered Ejection Fraction in Patients with Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) have been shown to prevent left ventricular remodeling and improve outcomes of patients with heart failure (HF). This study aimed to investigate whether the use of ACEi/ARB could be associated with HF with recovered ejection fraction (HFrecEF) in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).We collected individual patient data regarding demographics, echocardiogram, and treatment in DCM between 2003 and 2014 from the clinical personal record, a national database of the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40% were included. Eligible patients were divided into two groups according to the use of ACEi/ARB. A propensity score matching analysis was employed. The primary outcome was defined as LVEF ≥ 40% at 3 years of follow-up.Out of 5,955 patients with DCM and LVEF < 40%, propensity score matching yielded 830 pairs. The mean age was 58.8 years, and 1,184 (71.3%) of the patients were male. The primary outcome was observed more frequently in the ACEi/ARB group than in the no ACEi/ARB group (57.0% versus 49.3%; odds ratio 1.36; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-1.65; P = 0.002). Subgroup analysis revealed that the use of ACEi and ARB was associated with recovery of LVEF regardless of atrial fibrillation. The change in LVEF from baseline to 3 years of follow-up was greater in the ACEi-ARB group (14.9% ± 0.6% versus 12.3% ± 0.5%; P = 0.001).The use of ACEi/ARB is associated with HFrecEF in patients with DCM and reduced LVEF.

Sex Influence on Heart Failure Prognosis

Heart failure (HF) affects 1-2% of the population in developed countries and ~50% of patients living with it are women. Compared to men, women are more likely to be older and suffer hypertension, valvular heart disease, and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Since the number of women included in prospective HF studies has been low, much information regarding HF in women has been inferred from clinical trials observations in men and data obtained from registries. Several relevant sex-related differences in HF patients have been described, including biological mechanisms, age, etiology, precipitating factors, comorbidities, left ventricular ejection fraction, treatment effects, and prognosis. Women have greater clinical severity of HF, with more symptoms and worse functional class. However, females with HF have better prognosis compared to males. This survival advantage is particularly impressive given that women are less likely to receive guideline-proven therapies for HF than men. The reasons for this better prognosis are unknown but prior pregnancies may play a role. In this review article we aim to describe sex-related differences in HF and how these differences might explain why women with HF can expect to survive longer than men.

Feasibility and potential benefit of pre-procedural CMR imaging in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy undergoing cardiac resynchronisation therapy

Aim

To determine the feasibility and potential benefit of a full cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) work-up for assessing the location of scarred myocardium and the region of latest contraction (LCR) in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) undergoing cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT).

Methods

In 30 patients, scar identification and contraction timing analysis was retrospectively performed on CMR images. Fluoroscopic left ventricular (LV) lead positions were scored with respect to scar location, and when placed outside scar, with respect to the LCR. The association between the lead position with respect to scar, the LCR and echocardiographic LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) reduction was subsequently evaluated.

Results

The CMR work-up was feasible in all but one patient, in whom image quality was poor. Scar and contraction timing data were succesfully displayed on 36-segment cardiac bullseye plots. Patients with leads placed outside scar had larger LVESV reduction (−21 ± 21%, n = 19) compared to patients with leads within scar (1 ± 25%, n = 11), yet total scar burden was higher in the latter group. There was a trend towards larger LVESV reduction in patients with leads in the scar-free LCR, compared to leads situated in scar-free segments but not in the LCR (−34 ± 14% vs −15 ± 21%, p = 0.06).

Conclusions

The degree of reverse remodelling was larger in patients with leads situated in a scar-free LCR. In patients with leads situated within scar there was a neutral effect on reverse remodelling, which can be caused both by higher scar burden or lead position. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of a CMR work-up and potential benefit in ICM patients undergoing CRT.

Sex-Specific Differences in Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With or Without Defibrillation

Background

Women are underrepresented in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) trials. Some studies suggest that women fare better than men after CRT. We sought to explore clinical outcomes in women and men undergoing CRT‐defibrillation or CRT‐pacing in real‐world clinical practice.

Methods and Results

A national database (Hospital Episode Statistics for England) was used to quantify clinical outcomes in 43 730 patients (women: 10 890 [24.9%]; men: 32 840 [75.1%]) undergoing CRT over 7.6 years, (median follow‐up 2.2 years, interquartile range, 1–4 years). In analysis of the total population, the primary end point of total mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.69–0.76) and the secondary end point of total mortality or heart failure hospitalization (aHR, 0.79, 95% CI 0.75–0.82) were lower in women, independent of known confounders. Total mortality (aHR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.70–0.76) and total mortality or heart failure hospitalization (aHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.75–0.82) were lower for CRT‐defibrillation than for CRT‐pacing. In analyses of patients with (aHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80–0.98) or without (aHR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.66–0.73) a myocardial infarction, women had a lower total mortality. In sex‐specific analyses, total mortality was lower after CRT‐defibrillation in women (aHR, 0.83; P=0.013) and men (aHR, 0.69; P<0.001).

Conclusions

Compared with men, women lived longer and were less likely to be hospitalized for heart failure after CRT. In both sexes, CRT‐defibrillation was superior to CRT‐pacing with respect to survival and heart failure hospitalization. The longest survival after CRT was observed in women without a history of myocardial infarction.

Incremental Value of Implantable Cardiac Device Diagnostic Variables Over Clinical Parameters to Predict Mortality in Patients With Mild to Moderate Heart Failure

Background

Heart failure remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Clinical prediction models provide suboptimal estimates of mortality in this population. We sought to determine the incremental value of implantable device diagnostics over clinical prediction models for mortality.

Methods and Results

RAFT (Resynchronization/Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial) patients with implanted devices capable of device diagnostic monitoring were included, and demographic and clinical parameters were used to compute Meta‐Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) heart failure risk scores. Patients were classified according to MAGGIC score into low (0–16), intermediate (17–24), or high (>24) risk groups. Mortality was evaluated from 6 months postimplant in accordance with the RAFT protocol. In a subset of 1036 patients, multivariable analysis revealed that intermediate and high MAGGIC scores, fluid index, atrial fibrillation, and low activity flags were independent predictors of mortality. A device‐integrated diagnostic parameter that included a fluid index flag and either a positive atrial fibrillation flag or a positive activity flag was able to significantly differentiate higher from lower risk for mortality in the intermediate MAGGIC cohort. The effect was more pronounced in the high‐risk MAGGIC cohort, in which device‐integrated diagnostic–positive patients had a shorter time to death than those who were device‐integrated diagnostic negative.

Conclusions

Device diagnostics using a combination of fluid index trends, atrial fibrillation burden, and patient activity provide significant incremental prognostic value over clinical heart failure prediction scores in higher‐risk patients. This suggests that combining clinical and device diagnostic parameters may lead to models with better predictive power. Whether this risk is modifiable with early medical intervention would warrant further studies.

Clinical Trial Registration

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00251251.

Gender-Based Differences in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to have a multitude of beneficial effects in select patients with systolic heart failure, by enhancing reverse remodeling, improving quality of life and functional status, reducing risk of heart failure admission, and most importantly, improving survival. Although women were underrepresented in the clinical trials, they were demonstrated to derive greater therapeutic benefit from CRT compared with men. Importantly, women were noted to derive benefit at a lesser degree of QRS prolongation than men, well below the now generally accepted cutoff of QRS ≥150 milliseconds.

Electrical remodelling post cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure

BACKGROUND

The beneficial effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure are largely considered to be due to improved mechanical contractility. The contributory role of electrical remodelling is less clear. We sought to evaluate the impact of electrical remodelling in these patients.

METHODS

33 patients with conventional indications for CRT and with ischemic (ICM) (n = 17) and non-ischemic (NICM) (n = 16) aetiologies for heart failure were prospectively recruited. Functional parameters of peak exercise oxygen consumption (VO₂max) and Minnesota quality of life (QOL) score, echocardiographic measures of LV functions and parameters of electrical remodelling, e.g. intrinsic QRS duration (iQRSD), intracardiac conduction times of LV pacing to RV electrocardiogram (LVp-RVegm), were measured at CRT implant and after 6 months.

RESULTS

Only two electrical parameters predicted functional or symptomatic improvement. LVp-RVegm reduction significantly correlated with improvement in VO₂max (r = -0.42, p = 0.03 while reduction in iQRSD significantly correlated with improvement in QOL score (r = 0.39, p = 0.04). The extent of changes in LVp-RVegm and iQRSD was significantly greater in NICM than in ICM patients (p = 0.017 and p = 0.042 for heterogeneity). There was also significant differential impact on QOL score in the NICM relative to the ICM group (p = 0.003) but none with VO₂max. On multivariate analysis, only non-ischemic aetiology was a significant determinant of reduction in iQRSD.

CONCLUSION

CRT induces potentially beneficial reduction in LVp-RVegm and iQRSD, which are seen selectively in NICM rather than ICM patients. The extent of improvement in these markers is associated with some functional and symptomatic measures of CRT efficacy.

Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Women

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices have been prescribed for patients with heart failure for several decades. Factors leading to increased usage include significant enhancements in technology and availability of multiple randomized clinical trials demonstrating their benefit with improved implementation of evidence-based guidelines. Despite these advances, gaps still exist in the utilization and referral of these devices, particularly among women. This article reviews the literature on these devices with a focus on gender differences and proposes reasons for why they exist.

The effects of gender on electrical therapies for the heart: procedural considerations, results and complications: A report from the XII Congress of the Italian Association on Arrhythmology and Cardiostimulation (AIAC)

Use of cardiac implantable devices and catheter ablation is steadily increasing in Western countries following the positive results of clinical trials. Despite the advances in scientific knowledge, tools development, and techniques improvement we still have some grey area in the field of electrical therapies for the heart. In particular, several reports highlighted differences both in medical behaviour and procedural outcomes between female and male candidates. Women are referred later for catheter ablation of supraventricular arrhythmias, especially atrial fibrillation, leading to suboptimal results. On the opposite females present greater response to cardiac resynchronization, while the benefit of implantable defibrillator in primary prevention seems to be less pronounced. Differences on aetiology, clinical profile, and development of myocardial scarring are the more plausible causes. This review will discuss all these aspects together with gender-related differences in terms of acute/late complications. We will also provide useful hints on plausible mechanisms and practical procedural aspects.

Cardiac implantable electrical devices in women

Clinical trials have demonstrated the benefits of cardiac implantable electrical devices, which include pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), with respect to key clinical outcomes and survival. Women more often require permanent pacing for sick sinus syndrome, whereas atrioventricular block is more common in men. Women appear to have a higher incidence of complications with pacemaker implantation, as well as with ICD and CRT implantation. The indications for ICDs and CRT do not have any distinctions based on sex, and outcomes are comparable in men and women. In fact, women often seem to have better outcomes with CRT compared with men. Despite the demonstrated benefits of these devices, ICDs and CRT are underutilized in women. In this review, we explore sex differences in utilization, outcomes, and complications with pacemakers, ICDs, and CRT.

Utilization of cardiac resynchronization therapy in eligible patients hospitalized for heart failure and its association with patient outcomes

OBJECTIVES

We examined trends in CRT utilization overall and by sex and race and to assess whether CRT use is associated with a reduction in HF hospitalization and mortality.

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether underutilization and race/sex-based differences in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) use have persisted. The association between CRT and heart failure (HF) hospitalization and mortality in real-world practice remains unclear.

METHODS

We linked 72,008 HF patients from 388 hospitals participating in Get With The Guidelines HF eligible for CRT with Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services data to assess CRT utilization trends, HF hospitalization rates, and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

From 2005-2014, 18,935 (26.3%) eligible patients had CRT in place, implanted, or prescribed. The majority were male (60.0%) and white (61.9%). CRT utilization increased during the study period (P = .0002) especially in the early period. Women were less likely to receive CRT, and this difference increased over time (interaction P = .0037) despite greater mortality risk reduction (interaction P = .0043). Black patients were less likely than white patients to have CRT throughout the study period (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.79; 95% CI 0.74-0.85). Patients with CRT implanted during the index hospitalization had lower mortality (adjusted HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.59-0.71) and were less likely to be readmitted for HF than patients without CRT (adjusted HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.58-0.71).

CONCLUSIONS/RELEVANCE

CRT use has increased in all populations, but it remains underutilized. CRT remains more common among white than black HF patients, and women were less likely than men to receive CRT despite deriving greater benefit.

Effect of Gender on Outcomes After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With a Narrow QRS Complex

Background—

In EchoCRT, a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with a QRS duration of <130 ms and echocardiographic evidence of left ventricular dyssynchrony, the primary outcome (death from any cause or first hospitalization for worsening heart failure) occurred more frequently in the CRT-ON when compared with the control group. In this prespecified subgroup analysis, we evaluated the effect of sex on clinical outcome in EchoCRT.

Methods and Results—

In EchoCRT, 585 (72%) of included patients were men. At baseline, male patients had a higher incidence of ischemic cardiomyopathy and longer QRS duration. On uni- and multivariable analysis, no significant interaction was observed regarding sex for the primary or any of the secondary end points. Numerically, a higher all-cause mortality was observed in male patients randomized to CRT-ON versus CRT-OFF on univariable analysis (hazard ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.08–3.12); however, no statistically significant interaction compared with females randomized to CRT-ON versus CRT-OFF was noted (hazard ratio, 0.99; P interaction, 0.56). There was no difference in the primary safety end point of system-related complications, including CRT system- and implantation-related events.

Conclusions—

The largest hazard for all-cause mortality in EchoCRT was observed in men randomized to CRT-ON; the comparison with women did not reach statistical significance, which may be because of the premature termination of the trial and the limited data. These results suggest that male sex may be a risk factor for harm by CRT in patients with narrow QRS width, an observation which deserves further investigation.

Clinical Trial Registration—

URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00683696.

Outcomes in Women Undergoing Electrophysiological Procedures

The number of invasive electrophysiological procedures is steadily increasing in Western countries, as the age of the population increases and technologies advance. In recent years, gender-related differences in cardiac rhythm disorders have been increasingly appreciated, which can potentially have a great impact on the outcomes of invasive electrophysiological procedures. Among supraventricular arrhythmias, women have a higher incidence of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia and a significantly lower incidence of atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia compared with males, and present to ablation procedures later and after having failed more antiarrhythmic drugs. The results of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in women have been reported worse than in men. This finding is possibly due to a later referral of females to ablation procedures, who present older and with a higher incidence of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. With regard to cardiac device implantation procedures, a smaller survival benefit from prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation has been shown in women, essentially due to gender-specific differences in the clinical course of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction, with women dying predominantly from non-arrhythmic causes. On the other side, the clinical outcome of cardiac resynchronisation therapy seems to be more favourable in women, who experience a greater degree of reverse left ventricular remodelling and a striking decrease of heart failure events or mortality after biventricular pacing. This review will summarise the available evidence on gender-related differences in outcomes of invasive electrophysiological procedures.

Cardiac Resynchronization in Different Age Groups: A MADIT-CRT Long-Term Follow-Up Substudy

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization with defibrillators (CRT-D) reduces heart failure and mortality compared with defibrillators alone. Whether this applies to all ages is unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We assessed the association of age on heart failure and death as a post hoc analysis of the MADIT-CRT follow-up study, in which 1,281 patients with class I/II heart failure (HF) were randomized to CRT-D or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators alone. Different age groups (<60, 60-74, and ≥75 years) were evaluated over 7 years for mortality and HF events. Among the 3 age groups, there were 399, 651, and 231 patients, respectively. We compared events with the use of a multivariate regression model. CRT-D compared with defibrillators alone significantly reduced the composite of HF or death across all age groups: <60 years: relative risk reduction (RRR) = 36%; 60-74 years: RRR = 61%; ≥75 years: RRR = 56%. CRT-D significantly reduced HF in all age groups: <60 years: RRR = 49%; 60-74 years: RRR = 62%; ≥75 years: RRR = 74%. CRT-D was associated with significant mortality reduction only in the 60-74 year age group: RRR = 59%.

CONCLUSIONS

CRT-D reduced HF events and the composite of mortality or HF events during long-term follow-up in all age groups. CRT-D reduced mortality only in the 60-74 year age group.

Low-dose dobutamine stress echo for reverse remodeling prediction after cardiac resynchronization

PURPOSE

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a valuable option for patients with heart failure and wide QRS to reduce electromechanical dyssynchrony (DYS). High non-responders rate (30%) urges the need to improve selection of candidates for CRT. We hypothesized that low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) can help unmask dyssynchronous motion. The aim of this study is comparison between dyssynchrony index at rest and during low-dose dobutamine stress to predict left ventricular reverse remodeling after CRT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospectively, 57 consecutive patients (37 male) aged 61.8±9 who qualified for CRT according to current guidelines were enrolled. Two dimensional echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) were performed before and 6 month after CRT to assess reverse remodeling (rLV). Additionally DSE was performed before CRT. DYS was assessed at rest (DYSr) and peak DSE (DYSd) separately, as a difference between time to peak systolic velocity (Ts) of septum and lateral wall. Ts was corrected for heart rate.

RESULTS

rLV defined as decrease ≥15% of LVESV at follow-up was found in 38 (67%) patients. DYSr and DYSd were independent predictors of rLV (OR=1.04, Cl ±1.02-1.06, p<0.02 and OR=1.05, Cl±1.03-1.08, p<0.0002 respectively). ROC analysis found that DYSr>42ms and DYSd>59ms had sensitivity of 70% and 87%, specificity of 61% and 78%, and accuracy of 70% and 84% respectively for prediction of reverse remodeling LV. Area under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve for DYSd was higher than for DYSr (0.89 vs 0.71, p<0.007).

CONCLUSION

Exercise intraventricular dyssynchrony assessed by dobutamine stress echo is a strong independent predictor of cardiac resynchronization therapy response.

Patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy should also undergo implantation of a primary prevention defibrillator: the con perspective

This article describes a 45-year-old lady with longstanding dilated cardiomyopathy, who has progressed to New York Heart Association class III and has failed to respond to optimal pharmacologic therapy. On the basis of gender and the presence of an left bundle branch block, she has good prospects of responding to cardiac resynchronization therapy. In the background of nonischemic cardiomyopathy and the absence of myocardial scarring on cardiovascular magnetic resonance, her annualized risk of sudden cardiac death is low, estimated at 2.6%.

Sex Differences in Utilisation and Response to Implantable Device Therapy

Multiple studies have demonstrated that implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) provide significant mortality and morbidity benefits to eligible patients irrespective of gender. However, female patients are less likely to receive this life-saving therapy and are significantly under-represented in cardiac device trials. Various performance improvement programmes have proved that this gender disparity can be reduced and these therapies should be offered to all eligible patients regardless of sex. Efforts should be made to enrol more women in clinical trials and sex-specific analysis in medical device clinical studies should be encouraged. In this article we review the data on sex differences in clinical outcomes with ICDs and CRT and explore the reasons for this sex-based disparity.

ICD and CRT use in ischemic heart disease in women

Although the role of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in improving outcomes in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) has been described, the data regarding gender-based survival outcomes are limited. There is a higher preponderance of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) in women, and most of the ICM literature is derived from sub-study analysis. This review summarizes the current body of literature on prognosis, pathophysiology, and the present clinical practice for device implantation in women with ICM.

Sex differences in device therapy for heart failure: utilization, outcomes, and adverse events

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies of heart failure patients demonstrated significant improvement in exercise capacity, quality of life, cardiac left ventricular function, and survival from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but the underenrollment of women in these studies is notable. Etiological and pathophysiological differences may result in different outcomes in response to this treatment by sex. The observed disproportionate representation of women suggests that many women with heart failure either do not meet current clinical criteria to receive CRT in trials or are not properly recruited and maintained in these studies.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review through May 2014 of clinical trials and registries of CRT use that stratified outcomes by sex or reported percent women included. One-hundred eighty-three studies contained sex-specific information.

RESULTS

Ninety percent of the studies evaluated included ≤ 35% women. Fifty-six articles included effectiveness data that reported response with regard to specific outcome parameters. When compared with men, women exhibited more dramatic improvement in specific parameters. In the studies reporting hazard ratios for hospitalization or death, women generally had greater benefit from CRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review confirms women are markedly underrepresented in CRT trials, and when a CRT device is implanted, women have a therapeutic response that is equivalent to or better than in men, while there is no difference in adverse events reported by sex.

Differential survival for men and women from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest varies by age: results from the OPALS study

BACKGROUND

The effect of sex on survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is controversial. Some studies report more favorable outcomes in women, while others suggest the opposite, citing disparities in care. Whether sex predicts differential age-specific survival is still uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to study the sex-associated variation in survival to hospital discharge in OHCA patients as well as the relationship between age and sex for predicting survival.

METHODS

The Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support (OPALS) registry, collected in a large study of rapid defibrillation and advanced life support programs, is Utstein-compliant and has data on OHCA patients (1994 to 2002) from 20 communities in Ontario, Canada. All adult OHCAs not witnessed by emergency medical services (EMS) and treated during one of the three main OPALS phases were included. Clinically significant variables were chosen a priori (age, sex, witnessed arrest, initial cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR], shockable rhythm, EMS response interval, and OPALS study phase) and entered into a multivariable logistic regression model with survival to hospital discharge as the outcome, with sex and age as the primary risk factors. Fractional polynomials were used to explore the relationship between age and survival by sex.

RESULTS

A total of 11,479 (out of 20,695) OPALS cases met inclusion criteria and 10,862 (94.6%) had complete data for regression analysis. As a group, women were older than men (median age = 74 years vs. 69 years, p < 0.01), had fewer witnessed arrests (43% vs. 49%; p < 0.01), had fewer initial ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia rhythms (24% vs. 42%; p < 0.01), had a lower rate of bystander CPR (12% vs. 17%; p < 0.01), and had lower survival (1.7% vs. 3.2%; p < 0.01). Survival to hospital admission and return of spontaneous circulation did not differ between women and men (p > 0.05). The relationship between age, sex, and survival to hospital discharge could not be analyzed in a single regression model, as age did not have a linear relationship with survival for men, but did for women. Thus, age was kept as a continuous variable for women but was transformed for men using fractional polynomials [ln(age) + age(3) ]. In sex-stratified regression models, the adjusted probability of survival for women decreased as age increased (adjusted odds ratio = 0.88, 95% confidence interval = 0.81 to 0.96, per 5-year increase in age) while for men, the probability of survival initially increased with age until age 65 years and then decreased with increasing age. Women had a higher probability of survival until age 47 years, after which men maintained a higher probability of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall OHCA survival for women was lower than for men in the OPALS study. Factors related to the sex differences in survival (rates of bystander CPR and shockable rhythms) may be modifiable. The probability of survival differed across age for men and women in a nonlinear fashion. This differential influence of age on survival for men and women should be considered in future studies evaluating survival by sex in OHCA population.

Device therapies: new indications and future directions

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICDs), cardiac resynchronization (CRT) and combination (CRT-D) therapy have become an integral part of the management of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). ICDs treat ventricular arrhythmia and CRTs improve left ventricular systolic function by resynchronizing ventricular contraction. Device therapies (ICD, CRT-D), have been shown to reduce all-cause mortality, including sudden cardiac death. Hospitalizations are reduced with CRT and CRT-D therapy. Major device related complications include device infection, inappropriate shocks, lead malfunction and complications related to extraction of devices. Improvements in device design and implantation have included progressive miniaturization and increasing battery life of the device, optimization of response to CRT, and minimizing inappropriate device therapy. Additionally, better definition of the population with the greatest benefit is an area of active research.

More Favorable Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Women Than in Men

Background—

Data on sex difference in response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remain controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to summarize all published studies to determine whether sex-based differences in response to CRT exist.

Methods and Results—

We performed a literature search using MEDLINE (source PubMed; January 1966 to March 2014) and EMBASE (January 1980 to March 2014) with no restrictions. Pooled effect estimates were obtained by using random-effects meta-analysis. Seventy-two studies involving 33 434 patients were identified. Overall, female patients had better outcomes from CRT compared with male patients, with a significant 33% reduction in the risk of death from any cause (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.61–0.74; P <0.001), 20% reduction in death or hospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.71–0.90; P <0.001), 41% reduction in cardiac death (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.42–0.84; P <0.001), and 41% reduction in ventricular arrhythmias or sudden cardiac death (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.49–0.70; P <0.001). These more favorable responses to CRT in women were consistently associated with greater echocardiographic evidence of reverse cardiac remodeling in women than in men.

Conclusions—

Women obtained greater reductions in the risk of death from any cause, cardiac cause, death or hospitalization for heart failure, and ventricular arrhythmias or sudden cardiac death with CRT therapy compared with men, with consistently greater echocardiographic evidence of reverse cardiac remodeling in women than in men. Further studies are needed to investigate the exact reasons for these results and determine whether indications for CRT in women should be different from men.

Scar tissue-guided left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: an acute pressure-volume loop study

BACKGROUND

Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is hampered by the extent and location of left ventricular (LV) scar tissue. It is commonly advised to avoid scar tissue while placing the LV lead. However, whether individual patients benefit from this strategy remains unclear.

METHODS

Thirty-two CRT candidates with ischemic cardiomyopathy were enrolled from 2 successive clinical trials (TBS and E-pot study). Magnetic resonance imaging with late contrast enhancement was performed to assess location, degree and transmurality of LV scar tissue. Patients underwent invasive pressure-volume loop measurements to assess acute LV pump function changes during pacing at posterolateral (PL) and anterolateral LV sites.

RESULTS

In the study population (26 [81%] men, ejection fraction [EF] 22% ± 8%, QRS 149 ± 20 milliseconds), baseline mean stroke work (SW) and dP/dtmax were 4.4 ± 2.2 L∙mmHg and 849 ± 212 mmHg/s, respectively. The extent of scar tissue was inversely related to the acute increase in SW during pacing (R = -0.53, P = .002). Stimulating PL scar tissue resulted in deterioration of pump function (∆SW -17% ± 17%, P = .018), whereas pacing PL viable tissue led to an increase in pump function (∆SW +62% ± 51%, P < .001). Switching from pacing at the location of scar tissue, irrespective of the scar location, to viable tissue showed a significant increase in SW (-8% ± 20% vs +20 ± 40, P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

The extent of LV scar tissue is inversely related to acute pump function improvement during CRT. Pacing at the location of (transmural) scar tissue at any site of the LV will generally deteriorate LV pump function. Placing the LV lead over viable myocardium significantly improves pump function as compared with pacing at the location of scar tissue in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy: who benefits?

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been well established in multiple large trials to improve symptoms, hospitalizations, reverse remodeling, and mortality in well-selected patients with heart failure when used in addition to optimal medical therapy. Updated consensus guidelines outline patients in whom such therapy is most likely to result in substantial benefit. However, pooled data have demonstrated that only approximately 70% of patients who qualify for CRT based on current indications actually respond favorably. In addition, current guidelines are based on outcomes from the carefully selected patients enrolled in clinical trials, and almost certainly fail to include all patients who might benefit from CRT.

FINDINGS

The identification of patients most likely to benefit from CRT requires consideration of factors beyond these standard criteria, QRS morphology with particular consideration in patients with left bundle-branch block pattern, extent of QRS prolongation, etiology of cardiomyopathy, rhythm, and whether the patient requires or will eventually need antibradycardia pacing. In addition, the baseline severity of functional impairment may influence the type of benefit to be expected from CRT; for example, New York Heart Association class I patients may derive long-term benefit in cardiac structure and function, but no benefit in symptoms or hospitalizations can be reasonably expected. In contrast, certain New York Heart Association class IV patients may be too sick to realize long-term mortality benefits from CRT, but improvements in hemodynamic profile and functional capacity may represent vital advances in this population.

CONCLUSION

This review evaluates the evidence regarding the various factors that can predict positive or even detrimental responses to CRT, to help better determine who benefits most from this evolving therapy.

Optimizing benefit from CRT: role of speckle tracking echocardiography, the importance of LV lead position and scar

Cardiac resynchronization therapy is demonstrated to be effective in patients with advanced heart failure. Correcting mechanical dyssynchrony is proposed as the predominant mechanism of response. Achieving optimum left ventricular lead position, at the site of maximal mechanical dyssynchrony but away from transmural scar, is identified as one of the main determinants of both symptomatic and prognostic benefit. Strategies employing multimodality cardiac imaging techniques have been used to identify this optimal pacing site, in addition to any potential anatomical limitations to successful implantation. Speckle tracking echocardiography offers prospective lead targeting, incorporating pathophysiological determinants of cardiac resynchronization therapy response. This review considers the key factors in defining optimum left ventricular lead location, emphasizing the role of myocardial scar. The use of speckle tracking echocardiography and the potential for this technique to be incorporated into routine practice to guide the implant strategy in an individual patient is discussed.

Sex-Based Differences in Cardiac Arrhythmias, ICD Utilisation and Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy

Many important differences in the presentation and clinical course of cardiac arrhythmias are present between men and women that should be accounted for in clinical practice. In this paper, we review published data on gender differences in cardiac excitable properties, supraventricular tachycardias, ventricular tachycardias, sudden cardiac death, and the utilisation of implantable defibrillators and cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Women have a higher heart rate at rest, and a longer QT interval than men. They further have a narrower QRS complex and lower QRS voltages on the 12-lead ECG with more often non-specific repolarisation abnormalities at rest. Supraventricular tachycardias, such as AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, are twice as frequent in women compared with men. Atrial fibrillation, however, has a 1.5-fold higher prevalence in men. The triggers for idiopathic right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia (VT) initiation are gender specific, i.e. hormonal changes play an important role in the occurrence of these VTs in women. There are clear-cut gender differences in acquired and congenital LQTS. Brugada syndrome affects men more commonly and severely than women. Sudden cardiac death is less prevalent in women at all ages and occurs 10 years later in women than in men. This may be related to the later onset of clinically manifest coronary heart disease in women. Among patients who receive ICDs and CRT devices, women appear to be under-represented, while they may benefit even more from these novel therapies.

Gender disparity in cardiovascular disease: bias or biology?

This article addresses gender disparity in cardiovascular disease, with selected examples used to explore whether these disparities represent bias, biology or both. Gender-specific basic and clinical cardiovascular research is needed to address these issues, with rigorous application required for the emerging knowledge. These explorations offer promise to improve cardiovascular outcomes for women and are the basis for the application of gender-based evaluation of pathophysiology, clinical presentations, preventive interventions, diagnostic strategies, therapies and outcomes of cardiovascular disease in women.

Gender differences in the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and outcomes of ischemic heart failure

Despite advances in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF) remains a frequent acute and long-term outcome of ischemic heart disease (IHD). In response to acute coronary ischemia, women are relatively protected from apoptosis, and experience less adverse cardiac remodeling than men, frequently resulting in preservation of left ventricular size and ejection fraction. Despite these advantages, women are at increased risk for HF- complicating acute MI when compared with men. However, women with HF retain a survival advantage over men with HF, including a decreased risk of sudden death. Sex-specific treatment of HF has been hindered by historical under-representation of women in clinical trials, though recent work has suggested that women may have a differential response to some therapies such as cardiac resynchronization. This review highlights the sex differences in the pathophysiology, clinical presentation and outcomes of ischemic heart failure and discusses key areas worthy of further investigation.

Arrhythmias in women

There are important gender differences in cardiac electrophysiology that affect the epidemiology, presentation, and prognosis of various arrhythmias. Women have been noted to have higher resting heart rates compared to men. They also have a longer QT interval, which puts them at an increased risk for drug-induced torsades de pointes. Women with atrial fibrillation are at a higher risk of stroke, and they are less likely to receive anticoagulation and ablation procedures compared to men. Women have a lower risk of sudden cardiac death and are less likely to have known coronary artery disease at the time of an event compared to men. Both men and women have been shown to derive an equal survival benefit from implantable cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy, although these devices are significantly underutilized in women. Women also appear to have a better response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in terms of reduced numbers of hospitalizations and more robust reverse ventricular remodeling. Further studies are required to elucidate the underlying pathophysiology of these sex differences in cardiac arrhythmias.

Usefulness of left ventricular end-systolic dimension by echocardiography to predict reverse remodeling in patients with newly diagnosed severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction

In many patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction, the LV ejection fraction (LVEF)-a surrogate for reverse remodeling-fails to improve despite optimal medical therapy. The early identification of such patients would allow instituting aggressive treatment, including early therapy with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. We sought to establish the predictors of reverse remodeling in patients with LV systolic dysfunction receiving optimal medical therapy. Patients (n = 568) with newly documented LVEF of ≤0.35, who had ≥1 follow-up echocardiogram after ≥3 months, were evaluated. Reverse remodeling was defined as improvement in LVEF to >0.35. The clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic data were compared between patients with (n = 263) and without (n = 305) reverse remodeling. The mean follow-up was 27 ± 16 months. Patients who demonstrated reverse remodeling had a significantly greater mean follow-up LVEF (0.51 ± 0.09 vs 0.25 ± 0.08; p <0.001). On multivariate analysis, the baseline LV end-systolic diameter index was the strongest predictor of reverse remodeling (odds ratio 5.79; 95% confidence interval 1.82 to 18.46; p <0.001). Other independent predictors of reverse remodeling were female gender (odds ratio 1.88; 95% confidence interval 1.19 to 2.98; p = 0.007), and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (odds ratio 1.65; 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 2.58; p = 0.03). Baseline LVEF was not an independent predictor of reverse remodeling. In conclusion, among patients with newly diagnosed LV systolic dysfunction, the LV end-systolic diameter index, but not the LVEF, at diagnosis, was a strong predictor of reverse remodeling. Patients with a low likelihood of reverse remodeling might benefit from more aggressive heart failure therapy, including the possible early use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Contemporary and future trends in cardiac resynchronization therapy to enhance response

The rationale for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), expectations in terms of patient benefit, patient selection for CRT, selection of a CRT pacemaker (CRT-P) vs CRT plus implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (CRT-D) platform, and studies evaluating device programming to enhance benefit from CRT are reviewed. The notion of an "optimal" left ventricular (LV) pacing site, the rationale for identifying and avoiding LV pacing in regions of scar, the use of anatomic, hemodynamic, and electrical parameters to identify an optimal LV pacing site, and the potential utility of multisite LV pacing to enhance benefit from CRT are discussed. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of the various methods for LV lead delivery are reviewed.