Femoral vascular complications following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

Ultrasound-Guided Access Reduces Vascular Complications in Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation for Cardiac Arrhythmias

Background: Femoral vascular access using the standard anatomic landmark-guided method is often limited by peripheral artery disease and obesity. We investigated the effect of ultrasound-guided vascular puncture (UGVP) on the rate of vascular complications in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial or ventricular arrhythmias. Methods: The data of 479 patients (59% male, mean age 68 years ± 11 years) undergoing catheter ablation for left atrial (n = 426; 89%), right atrial (n = 28; 6%) or ventricular arrhythmias (n = 28; 6%) were analyzed. All patients were on uninterrupted oral anticoagulants and heparin was administered intravenously during the procedure. Femoral access complications were compared between patients undergoing UGVP (n = 320; 67%) and patients undergoing a conventional approach (n = 159; 33%). Complication rates were also compared between patients with a BMI of >30 kg/m2 (n = 136) and patients with a BMI < 30 kg/m2 (n = 343). Results: Total vascular access complications including mild hematomas were n = 37 (7.7%). In the conventional group n = 17 (10.7%) and in the ultrasound (US) group n = 20 (6.3%) total vascular access complications occurred (OR 0.557, 95% CI 0.283−1.096). UGVP significantly reduced the risk of hematoma > 5 cm (OR 0.382, 95% CI 0.148, 0.988) or pseudoaneurysm (OR 0.160, 95% CI 0.032, 0.804). There was no significant difference between the groups regarding retroperitoneal hematomas or AV fistulas (p > 0.05). In patients with BMI > 30 kg/m2, UGVP led to a highly relevant reduction in the risk of total vascular access complications (OR 0.138, 95% CI 0.027, 0.659), hematomas > 5 cm (OR 0.051, 95% CI 0.000, 0.466) and pseudoaneurysms (OR 0.051, 95% CI 0.000, 0.466). Conclusion: UGVP significantly reduces vascular access complications. Patients with a BMI > 30 kg/m2 seem to particularly profit from a UGVP approach.

Near zero vascular complications using echo-guided puncture during catheter ablation of arrhythmias: A retrospective study and literature review

Background

Catheter ablation (CA) is routinely used for the treatment of arrhythmias. Vascular complications are the most common complications during these procedures. Previous data reported that ultrasound (US)-guided puncture is a useful method to avoid vascular complications. We reported our experience using US-guided puncture in patients undergoing CA for arrhythmias.

Methods

A total of 273 patients (mean age 57 ± 17 years; 58% male) were referred to our center for CA of arrhythmias from January 2016 to December 2019. All procedures were performed by expert operators, and US-guided vascular access was performed on all patients. Doppler sonography was performed the day after the procedure on all patients.

Results

Eighty-four patients (31%) underwent atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia ablation, 49 patients (18%) atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia ablation, 14 patients (5%) atrial tachycardia ablation, 25 patients (9%) atrial flutter ablation, 63 patients (23%) atrial fibrillation ablation, and 38 patients (14%) ventricular tachycardia ablation. Vascular pseudo-aneurysms and arteriovenous fistula were defined as major complications; furthermore, venous thrombosis and inguinal hematomas were as defined minor complications. The percentage of major vascular complications was 0.3% (1 arteriovenous fistula) and the percentage of minor vascular complications was 0.3% (1 venous thrombosis).

Discussion

Ultrasound-guided vascular puncture in patients undergoing CA is useful to improve procedural success and reduce complications.

[Comparative efficacy and safety of enoxaparin followed by warfarin and rivaroxaban monotherapy in the treatment of venous thrombosis in patients after intracardiac catheter interventions]

AIM

to compare two anticoagulant therapy (ACT) regimens in the treatment of venous thrombosis (VT) in patients after catheter interventions - electrophysiological studies (EFIs) and ablations: enoxaparin followed by warfarin, and rivaroxaban monotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included patients from 18 years and older with heart rhythm disorders and planned catheter ablation. When parietal venous thrombosis (VT) were detected at the femoral vein puncture site, all patients were randomly assigned to two treatment groups. In group I enoxaparin 1 mg/kg was prescribed every 12 hours with switching to warfarin after 7 days with maintenance of the target INR values (2.0-3.0). In group II rivaroxaban therapy was started at a dose of 15 mg twise/day for 21 days with a further transition to a dose of 20 mg/day. The total period of observation and treatment of patients was at least 3 months.

RESULTS

408 patients were observed, 42 (10.3%) patients with parietal VT were divided into two treatment groups. In group I (n=16) complete lysis of VT was noted by the 7th day of treatment in 7 (58.3%) patients, however this scheme was associated with a greater risk of complications (р=0.003) at the puncture site in the form of arteriovenous fistulae (n=1; 8.3%) and intermuscular hematomas (n=4; 25%). In group II (n=26), no complications were noted, the lysis time of VT was on average 21 days (n=18; 69.2%). Complete lysis of VT was noted in both groups at the time of the control observation point (3rd month).

CONCLUSION

The efficiency of the two VT treatment regimens was comparable. Enoxaparin therapy is associated with a high risk of local complications, namely intermuscular hematomas (n=4; 25%) and arteriovenous fistulas (n=1; 8.3%). Rivaroxaban monotherapy is safer (p=0.003); in Group II none of the patients had any complications.

Prevalence and Characteristics of Venous Thrombosis after Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Receiving Periprocedural Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Background

Periprocedural venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) area rare occurrence but a critical complication after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF).The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of symptomatic deep vein thromboses (DVTs) and pulmonary thromboembolisms (PTEs) in patients who underwent AF catheter ablation and received periprocedural oral anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).

Methods and Results

A total of 2,193 consecutive patients undergoing AF catheter ablation with periprocedural DOACs were retrospectively analyzed.Two patients (0.091%) experienced symptomatic DVTs after the ablation, and no patients had any PTEs. One patient was a 72-year-old female who underwent cryoballoon ablation with periprocedural apixaban at a dose of 2.5 mg twice daily. The other patient was a 74-year-old male who underwent a Hot Balloon ablation and thereafter radiofrequency catheter ablation for recurrent AF with edoxaban at30 mg once daily. Both DVT patients underwent AF ablation by the right femoral vein approach, and after discharge had right leg pain and swelling on post-procedural days 4 and 8, respectively. TheDVT was treated by increasing the dose of apixaban and changing it from 30 mg/day of edoxaban to 15-30 mg/day of rivaroxaban, and the thrombi completely disappeared in both patients without any thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications.

Conclusions

AF catheter ablation with periprocedural DOAC treatment revealed anextremely low incidence of symptomatic VTEs, which may be successfully treated by increasing the DOAC dose or changing the DOAC type.

Venous Thrombosis After Electrophysiology Procedures: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Femoral venous access for catheter introduction represents the cornerstone of electrophysiology (EP) procedures. Limited data are available regarding postprocedure VTE. The aim of this systematic review is to determine the incidence of DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE) associated with femoral vein catheterization during EP procedures.

METHODS

An electronic search was conducted for studies documenting the incidence of DVT and PE after EP procedures. Studies were classified as atrial fibrillation (AF) or non-AF ablation procedures.

RESULTS

Two thousand eight-hundred sixty-four studies were evaluated, 16 of which were included in the analysis. The incidence of DVT after AF and non-AF ablations reached as high as 0.33% and 2.38%, respectively, with a pooled incidence of 0% (95% CI, 0%-0.0003%) and 0.24% (95% CI, 0.08%-0.39%), respectively. The incidence of PE was 0.29% after AF ablation and ranged from 0% to 1.67% for non-AF procedures; the pooled incidence after non-AF ablations was 0.12% (95% CI, 0%-0.25%). Asymptomatic DVT was documented in up to 21.2% of patients. Hematomas occurred in 1.05% of AF ablations (95% CI, 0.30%-1.8%) and 0.3% of non-AF ablations (95% CI, 0.09%-0.51%).

CONCLUSIONS

A lower incidence of symptomatic DVT and PE was observed after AF ablations as opposed to non-AF ablations, likely due to the use of routine periprocedural anticoagulation. Asymptomatic DVTs appear to be common, although their significance is unclear. Future studies are required to weigh the risk of hematoma against the risk of VTE associated with the use of prophylactic anticoagulation after non-AF ablation procedures.

Complications associated with radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary veins

OBJECTIVE

Radiofrequency ablation is an efficacious alternative in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation who do not respond to or are intolerant to at least one class I or class III antiarrhythmic drug. Although radiofrequency ablation is a safe procedure, complications can occur. Depending on the location, these complications can be classified into those that affect the pulmonary veins themselves, cardiac complications, extracardiac intrathoracic complications, remote complications, and those that result from vascular access. The most common complications are hematomas, arteriovenous fistulas, and pseudoaneurysms at the puncture site. Some complications are benign and transient, such as gastroparesis or diaphragmatic elevation, whereas others are potentially fatal, such as cardiac tamponade.

CONCLUSION

Radiologists must be familiar with the complications that can occur secondary to pulmonary vein ablation to ensure early diagnosis and treatment.

Usefulness of dabigatran etexilate as periprocedural anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation ablation

BACKGROUND

The usefulness of dabigatran etexilate for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has been reported.

OBJECTIVES

In this study the efficacy and safety of dabigatran etexilate for anticoagulation for AF ablation were examined.

METHOD

Patients were divided into three groups: Group 1, interrupted warfarin bridged by heparin between pre- and post-ablation; Group 2, continuous warfarin therapy; and Group 3, dabigatran etexilate therapy. Anticoagulation therapy with warfarin or dabigatran etexilate was performed from 30 days before to at least 90 days after AF ablation. Dabigatran etexilate was administered at 110 or 150 mg twice daily, depending on renal function and age.

RESULTS

Patients' clinical characteristics, associated disorders, echocardiographic parameters and arrhythmia status were not different among the three groups. Procedural parameters such as procedural time and radiofrequency energy supply were also not different among the three groups. The dabigatran etexilate group and the warfarin groups had no embolic complications (stroke, cerebral transient ischaemic attack, deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism). No pericardial tamponade was observed in the dabigatran etexilate group, while two patients in each of Group 1 (2/194, 1.0 %) and Group 2 (2/203, 0.98 %) developed cardiac tamponade, though the differences were not significant. Pericardial effusion and groin haematoma were observed in one patient each (1/105, 0.9 %) in the dabigatran etexilate group, and the incidences were not different from the warfarin group (Group 1: 4/194, 2.1 % and 2/194, 1.0 %; Group 2: 3/203, 1.5 % and 2/203, 1.0 %, respectively). As a whole, the safety outcomes did not differ among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

Dabigatran etexilate is an effective and safe anticoagulation therapy for AF ablation. Thus, dabigatran etexilate appears to be useful as an alternative anticoagulant therapy to warfarin for AF ablation.

Dabigatran in the peri-procedural period for radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: efficacy, safety, and impact on duration of hospital stay

Purpose

Dabigatran is effective for both the prevention of stroke and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the safety and efficacy of the use of dabigatran in the peri-procedural period for radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of AF is unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of dabigatran in the peri-procedural period for RFCA of AF and the duration of hospital stay.

Methods

Consecutive patients (n = 227) who underwent RFCA for AF were prospectively analyzed. Peri-procedural anticoagulant therapy with dabigatran (n = 101, D group) was compared with warfarin and heparin bridging (n = 126, W group). Dabigatran was discontinued 12–24 h before and restarted 3 h after the procedure. Warfarin was stopped 3 days before the procedure and unfractionated heparin was administered.

Results

Ischemic stroke occurred in one patient of the D group (0.8 %). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of major bleeding (three cases of cardiac tamponade in each group and one case of intracranial bleeding in the W group, p = 0.93) or minor bleeding (five cases in the D group vs. five in the W group, p = 0.54). The duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the D group than in the W group (7.2 vs. 10.3 days, p = 0.0001).

Conclusions

Peri-procedural anticoagulation therapy with dabigatran for RFCA of AF was equally safe and effective compared with warfarin and heparin bridging. The use of dabigatran for RFCA of AF shortened the duration of hospital stay.

Real-time ultrasound guidance reduces total and major vascular complications in patients undergoing pulmonary vein antral isolation on therapeutic warfarin

BACKGROUND

Vascular complications are a known risk of catheter-based pulmonary vein antral isolation (PVAI). Procedure-related thromboembolic events necessitate full-dose anticoagulation, which worsens outcomes in the event of vascular access injury.

OBJECTIVE

Real-time ultrasound allows direct visualization of vascular structures. We hypothesized that ultrasound use with venipuncture reduces vascular complications associated with PVAI.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all adverse events occurring with PVAI was performed during two periods: 2005-2006 when ultrasound was not used and 2008-2010 when ultrasound was routinely employed. All patients received full-dose IV heparin during PVAI. In the no ultrasound cohort, only 14 % underwent PVAI without stopping warfarin, while 91 % of patients in the ultrasound cohort were on continued warfarin. Only patients deemed at high risk for thromboembolism with a periprocedural international normalized ratio (INR) less than 2 were bridged with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin.

RESULTS

Ultrasound reduced total vascular complications (1.7 vs. 0.5 %, p < 0.01) and decreased the incidence of major vascular complications by sevenfold. Warfarin with INR ≥ 1.2 on the day of PVAI was associated with more vascular complications (4.3 vs. 1.2 %, p < 0.01). Ultrasound guidance overcame the risk associated with warfarin therapy. Vascular complications in anticoagulated patients with INR ≥ 1.2 using ultrasound guidance were two- and ninefold lower than those in patients not using ultrasound with an INR < 1.2 (0.5 vs. 1.2 %, p < 0.05) and INR ≥ 1.2 (0.5 vs. 4.3 %, p < 0.01), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided venipuncture improves the safety profile of PVAI, reducing vascular complications in patients on warfarin to levels below those with no ultrasound and off warfarin.

Complications from catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia requiring treatment that is encountered in clinical practice. Recent advances in the understanding of underlying mechanisms of AF have led to the increased use of catheter ablation (CA) as a treatment modality for paroxysmal, persistent, or long-standing persistent AF in patients with symptomatic AF despite treatment with antiarrhythmic medications. Because of the complexity in technique and anatomic location of the ablation sites, it is not surprising that CA of AF is associated with a greater risk of procedural complications compared with simpler cardiac ablation procedures. Major and minor complications, including life-threatening complications, have been described and quantified. This systematic review describes the potential risks of CA that have been reported over a period and provides insights into the evolving strategies to minimize these complications, thus making CA techniques safer and potentially more efficacious for AF.

Peri-procedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation

Radiofrequency catheter ablation is being used with increasing frequency as a strategy to manage atrial fibrillation. Patients undergoing this procedure are at increased short-term risk of thromboembolism for several days and up to 4 weeks or longer after their ablation, and anticoagulation management surrounding the ablation procedure remains controversial. Although no conclusive recommendations can be made, published guidelines and data support therapeutic anticoagulation with warfarin for 3 weeks prior and intravenous heparin during the ablation. Warfarin may either be continued through the ablation or stopped 2-5 days prior. If the latter approach is chosen, a pre-ablation bridging strategy of enoxaparin 1mg/kg twice daily is reasonable in selected patients unless the patient's bleeding risk dictates using a lower dose regimen (0.5mg/kg twice daily) or avoiding bridging altogether. Fewer data are available for post-ablation management strategies, and current practice patterns are based largely on single-center experiences in smaller, non-randomized studies. For lower risk patients (CHADS(2) 0-1), either warfarin or aspirin may be utilized without bridging. In higher thromboembolic risk patients (CHADS(2) >or=2), either enoxaparin (1mg/kg twice daily) or heparin may be started within the first 12-24h post-procedure. For patients with bleeding risk factors, enoxaparin may be subsequently reduced to 0.5mg/kg until the INR is therapeutic, although the efficacy of this lower dosing regimen has not been well studied. In accordance with national guidelines, warfarin should be continued post-ablation for a minimum of 2 months and then indefinitely in patients with a CHADS(2) score >or= 2.