1
|
Rosu-Bubulac M, Trankle CR, Mankad P, Grizzard JD, Ellenbogen KA, Jordan JH, Weiss E. Institutional experience report on the target contouring workflow in the radiotherapy department for stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation delivered on conventional linear accelerators. Strahlenther Onkol 2024; 200:83-96. [PMID: 37872398 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02159-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR), the target is defined using multiple imaging studies and a multidisciplinary team consisting of electrophysiologist, cardiologist, cardiac radiologist, and radiation oncologist collaborate to identify the target and delineate it on the imaging studies of interest. This report describes the workflow employed in our radiotherapy department to transfer the target identified based on electrophysiology and cardiology imaging to the treatment planning image set. METHODS The radiotherapy team was presented with an initial target in cardiac axes orientation, contoured on a wideband late gadolinium-enhanced (WB-LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) study, which was subsequently transferred to the computed tomography (CT) scan used for treatment planning-i.e., the average intensity projection (AIP) image set derived from a 4D CT-via an axial CMR image set, using rigid image registration focused on the target area. The cardiac and the respiratory motion of the target were resolved using ciné-CMR and 4D CT imaging studies, respectively. RESULTS The workflow was carried out for 6 patients and resulted in an internal target defined in standard anatomical orientation that encompassed the cardiac and the respiratory motion of the initial target. CONCLUSION An image registration-based workflow was implemented to render the STAR target on the planning image set in a consistent manner, using commercial software traditionally available for radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihaela Rosu-Bubulac
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
| | - Cory R Trankle
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
- Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Pranav Mankad
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
- Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - John D Grizzard
- Department of Radiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Kenneth A Ellenbogen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
- Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Jennifer H Jordan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
- Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Elisabeth Weiss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dacher JN, Langguth P, Adam D, Winkler WB, Martí-Almor J, Prenner G, Trucco ME, Kol A, Xiang M, Melissano D, Fawaz H, Lau DH. Safety and performance of MR-conditional pacing systems with automated MRI mode at 1.5 and 3 Tesla. Eur Radiol 2023; 33:6948-6958. [PMID: 37195432 PMCID: PMC10189234 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09650-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Revised: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate at 1.5 and 3 T MRI the safety and performance of trademarked ENO®, TEO®, or OTO® pacing systems with automated MRI Mode and the image quality of non-enhanced MR examinations. METHODS A total of 267 implanted patients underwent MRI examination (brain, cardiac, shoulder, cervical spine) at 1.5 (n = 126) or 3 T (n = 141). MRI-related device complications, lead electrical performances stability at 1-month post-MRI, proper functioning of the automated MRI mode and image quality were evaluated. RESULTS Freedom from MRI-related complications at 1 month post-MRI was 100% in both 1.5 and 3 T arms (both p < 0.0001). The stability of pacing capture threshold was respectively at 1.5 and 3 T (atrial:: 98.9% (p = 0.001) and 100% (p < 0.0001); ventricular: both 100% (p < 0001)). The stability of sensing was respectively at 1.5 and 3 T (atrial: 100% (p = 0.0001) and 96.9% (p = 0.01); ventricular: 100% (p < 0.0001) and 99.1% (p = 0.0001)). All devices switched automatically to the programmed asynchronous mode in the MRI environment and to initially programmed mode after the MRI exam. While all MR examinations were assessed as interpretable, artifacts deteriorated a subset of examinations including mostly cardiac and shoulder ones. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the safety and electrical stability of ENO®, TEO®, or OTO® pacing systems at 1 month post-MRI at 1.5 and 3 T. Even if artifacts were noticed in a subset of examinations, overall interpretability was preserved. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT ENO®, TEO®, and OTO® pacing systems switch to MR-mode when detecting magnetic field and switch back on conventional mode after MRI. Their safety and electrical stability at 1 month post MRI were shown at 1.5 and 3 T. Overall interpretability was preserved. KEY POINTS • Patients implanted with an MRI conditional cardiac pacemaker can be safely scanned under 1.5 or 3 Tesla MRI with preserved interpretability. • Electrical parameters of the MRI conditional pacing system remain stable after a 1.5 or 3 Tesla MRI scan. • The automated MRI mode enabled the automatic switch to asynchronous mode in the MRI environment and to initial settings after the MRI scan in all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Nicolas Dacher
- Department of Radiology, Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN INSERM U1096 and CHU Rouen, 37 Boulevard Gambetta, 76000, Rouen, France.
| | - Patrick Langguth
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - David Adam
- Monash Cardiac Rhythm Management Department, Monash Heart, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Walther-Benedikt Winkler
- Medical Department II With Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Klinik Landstrasse, Vienna, Austria
| | - Julio Martí-Almor
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital del Mar (IMAS-UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Günther Prenner
- Universitätsklinik Für Innere Medizin, Klinische Abteilung Für Kardiologie, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - María Emilce Trucco
- Arrhythmia Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitari Doctor Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - Amir Kol
- Department of Cardiology, San Camillo De Lellis Hospital, ASL Rieti, Rieti, Italy
| | - Meixiang Xiang
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | | | - Hanan Fawaz
- Clinical Affairs, MicroPort CRM, Clamart, France
| | - Dennis H Lau
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fluschnik N, Tahir E, Erley J, Müllerleile K, Metzner A, Wenzel JP, Guerreiro H, Adam G, Blankenberg S, Kirchhof P, Tönnis T, Nikorowitsch J. 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a single centre experience. Europace 2022; 25:571-577. [PMID: 36413601 PMCID: PMC9935018 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Three Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides critical imaging information for many conditions. Owing to potential interactions of the magnetic field, it is largely withheld from patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Therefore, we assessed the safety of 3T MRI in patients with '3T MRI-conditional' and 'non-3T MRI-conditional' CIEDs. METHODS AND RESULTS We performed a retrospective single-centre analysis of clinically indicated 3T MRI examinations in patients with conventional pacemakers, cardiac resynchronization devices, and implanted defibrillators from April 2020 to May 2022. All CIEDs were interrogated and programmed before and after scanning. Adverse events included all-cause death, arrhythmias, loss of capture, inappropriate anti-tachycardia therapies, electrical reset, and lead or generator failure during or shortly after MRI. Changes in signal amplitude and lead impedance were systematically assessed. Statistics included median and interquartile range. A total of 132 MRI examinations were performed on a 3T scanner in 97 patients. Thirty-five examinations were performed in patients with 'non-3T MRI-conditional' CIEDs. Twenty-six scans were performed in pacemaker-dependent patients. No adverse events occurred during or shortly after MRI. P-wave or R-wave reductions ≥ 50 and ≥ 25%, respectively, were noted after three (2.3%) scans, all in patients with '3T MRI-conditional' CIEDs. Pacing and shock impedance changed by ± 30% in one case (0.7%). Battery voltage and stimulation thresholds did not relevantly change after MRI. CONCLUSION Pending verification in independent series, our data suggest that clinically indicated MRI scans at 3T field strength should not be withheld from patients with cardiac pacemakers or defibrillators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Fluschnik
- Corresponding author. Phone: +49 (0) 40 7410 18576, Fax: +49 (0) 40 7410 58206, E-mail address:
| | - Enver Tahir
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr 52, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jennifer Erley
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr 52, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kai Müllerleile
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Metzner
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jan-Per Wenzel
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20251 Hamburg, Germany,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Luebeck, Martinistr 52, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Helena Guerreiro
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gerhard Adam
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr 52, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Blankenberg
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20251 Hamburg, Germany,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Luebeck, Martinistr 52, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Paulus Kirchhof
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20251 Hamburg, Germany,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Luebeck, Martinistr 52, 20251 Hamburg, Germany,Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Tobias Tönnis
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Julius Nikorowitsch
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20251 Hamburg, Germany,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Luebeck, Martinistr 52, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|