Treatment of Neurological Autoimmune Diseases with Immunoglobulins: First Insights from the Prospective SIGNS Registry

Efficacy and patient satisfaction in the use of subcutaneous immunoglobulin immunotherapy for the treatment of auto-immune neuromuscular diseases

We reviewed the efficacy of SCIg administration in terms of muscle strength maintenance and patient satisfaction comparing with IVIg in the treatment of auto-immune neuromuscular diseases. A systematic review was conducted, and identified studies from databases (PUBMED, EMBASE, EBSCO, Web of Science and Google Scholar) which were analyzed. The methodological quality of the selected publications was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were extracted from a total of 11 studies Fixed and random-effect model meta-analyses were performed. For the maintenance of muscle strength, Overall Neuropathy Limitations Scale (ONLS) data from 100 patients diagnosed with multifocal mononeuropathy (MMN) or chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) were pooled together. Switching to subcutaneous immunoglobulin administration led to a significant improvement (fixed effects model, p = 0.002). In data collected using the Medical Research Council Scale for Muscle Strength data from 140 patients with a wider range of disorders, a small but significant improvement in overall strength was observed in the SCIg group (p < 0.0001). In addition, the results of two studies measuring health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction were pooled. Data from 49 patients suffering from MMN, CIDP, and a variety of different myopathies demonstrated a small but significant increase in the mean 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) scores (p < 0.0001). A highly significant difference was revealed when comparing data from 119 patients' responses to the Life Quality Index questionnaire (LQI) assessing patient satisfaction (p < 0.0001). This is the first analysis showing that SCIg is more effective than IVIg in improving Patient Reported Outcomes in auto-immune neuromuscular disease. These results should permit a broad range of patients to self-administer immunoglobulin treatments at home, potentially improving patient acceptability while reducing hospital visits and healthcare costs for the treatment of chronic auto-immune neuropathies.

Human Immunoglobulin Versus Plasmapheresis in Guillain-Barre Syndrome and Myasthenia Gravis: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety over a short time period of human intravenous immunoglobulin versus plasma exchange (PE) in the management of some autoimmune neurologic diseases. In addition, length of hospital stay and duration of ventilator support were compared.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials and analytical observational studies of more than 10 cases were reviewed. Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, HINARI, and Ovid, were searched as data source. Reference lists were examined for further relevant articles. A random-effect model was used to derive a pooled risk ratio.

RESULTS

A total of 552 articles were found and 24 met the criteria for a studied population of 4657 cases: 14 articles were about Guillain-Barré syndrome and 10 of myasthenia gravis. No evidence was found to suggest that PE or intravenous immunoglobulin differed in terms of efficacy or safety to treat any of the 2 diseases. Hospital stay length and ventilatory support time are different in each illness; however, we found no statistical difference in either of the 2 treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence for superiority in the efficacy or safety of immunoglobulin or plasmapheresis in the management of Guillain-Barré syndrome and myasthenia gravis. However, caution should be exercised in the interpretation of these results given the limitations in the quality of the evidence and the heterogeneity of the studies.

Intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of neurologic disorders

Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs) are often used in the treatment of autoimmune disorders and immunodeficiencies, and it has been estimated that neurologic indications can account for up to 43% of IVIG used in clinical practice. In neurologic clinical practice, IVIG is used for acute therapy of newly diagnosed autoimmune disorders or exacerbations of pre-existing conditions, or as long-term maintenance treatment for chronic disorders. IVIG exerts its effects on humoral and cell-based immunity through multiple pathways, without a single dominant mechanism. Clinical use of IVIG has been supported by guidelines from American Academy of Neurology and European Federation of Neurologic Societies. IVIG is generally recommended for the treatment of Guillain-Barre syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy in adults, multifocal motor neuropathy and myasthenia gravis, and should be considered as a treatment option for dermatomyositis in adults and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Additional potential indications include stiff person syndrome, multiple sclerosis during pregnancy or while breastfeeding, refractory autoimmune epilepsy, and paraneoplastic disorders. Clinical use of IVIG is mostly safe but few adverse effects may still occur with potentially severe complications, including aseptic meningitis and thromboembolism. In addition to intravenous route (IVIG), subcutaneous immunoglobulins have been used as an alternative treatment option, especially in patients with limited intravenous access. Treatment with IVIG is effective in various autoimmune diseases, but its broader use is constrained by limited supply. This review evaluates the use of immunoglobulins in treatment of neurologic diseases.

Evaluation of ceftiofur-PHBV microparticles in rats

Despite the high number of antibiotics used for the treatment of infectious disease in animals, the development of slow release formulations presents a significant challenge, particularly in using novel biomaterials with low cost. In this report, we studied the pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and therapeutic activity of ceftiofur–PHBV (ceftiofur–poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)) in rats. The pharmacokinetic study demonstrated a sustained release of ceftiofur into the bloodstream, with detectable levels over the minimum inhibitory concentration for at least 17 days after a single intramuscular injection of ceftiofur–PHBV (10 mg/kg weight). In addition, the toxicological evaluation of biochemical, hematological, and coagulation blood parameters at the therapeutic dose demonstrated the safety of ceftiofur–PHBV, with no adverse effects. In addition, ceftiofur–PHBV exhibited a therapeutic effect for a longer time period than the nonencapsulated ceftiofur in rats challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium. The slow release of ceftiofur from the ceftiofur–PHBV, its low toxicity in the blood parameters evaluated, and the efficacy in the rats infected with Salmonella Typhimurium make ceftiofur–PHBV a strong candidate for biotechnological applications in the veterinary industry.