1
|
Berger M. Antibodies to vaccine antigens in pooled polyclonal human IgG products. Transfusion 2019; 58 Suppl 3:3096-3105. [PMID: 30536430 DOI: 10.1111/trf.15017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2018] [Accepted: 10/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Immune-deficient patients depend on the antibodies in pooled human immunoglobulin G (IgG) preparations to remain free from serious infections. The potency of IgG preparations is therefore an ongoing concern. The use of pooled IgG to prevent infection is based on the concept that healthy adults have recovered from infections earlier in life and maintain relatively high antibody titers. In general, vaccine-induced immunity is less robust or long-lasting than immunity after natural infection, and many infectious diseases which were formerly widely prevalent have become much less common due to improved hygiene and vaccines. This raises questions as to the adequacy of protective antibodies in current IgG preparations. This paper reviews available data on antibodies against selected bacterial and virus vaccine antigens in current IgG products. Most products contain sufficient antibody to yield levels above minimal protective concentrations to a broad range of pathogens and toxins. Illustrative examples of effects of vaccines on antibody content of IgG products are also discussed: antibody titers to hepatitis A virus in donor plasma pools in both the US and EU are dropping due to decreased natural infection, but they are still sufficient to provide robust protection. Increasing seroprevalence of hepatitis B virus as a result of immunization suggests that antibody titers against this virus may actually be increasing. Finally, serial studies suggest that pooled IgG provides protection against seasonal influenza viruses despite year-to-year antigenic drift, and is also likely to provide at least some protective antibody against potentially pandemic strains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melvin Berger
- Global Medical Affairs, CSL Behring, LLC, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Parker AR, Bradley C, Harding S, Sánchez-Ramón S, Jolles S, Kiani-Alikhan S. Measurement and interpretation of Salmonella typhi Vi IgG antibodies for the assessment of adaptive immunity. J Immunol Methods 2018; 459:1-10. [PMID: 29800575 DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2018.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2017] [Revised: 04/26/2018] [Accepted: 05/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Response to polysaccharide vaccination can be an invaluable tool for assessing functionality of the adaptive immune system. Measurement of antibodies raised in response to Pneumovax®23 is the current gold standard test, but there are significant challenges and constraints in both the measurement and interpretation of the response. An alternative polysaccharide vaccine approach (Salmonella typhi Vi capsule (ViCPS)) has been suggested. In the present article, we review current evidence for the measurement of ViCPS antibodies in the diagnosis of primary and secondary antibody deficiencies. In particular, we review emerging data suggesting their interpretation in combination with the response to Pneumovax®23 and comment upon the utility of these vaccines to assess humoral immune responses while receiving immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IGRT).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Silvia Sánchez-Ramón
- Department of Clinical Immunology Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Stephen Jolles
- Immunodeficiency Centre for Wales, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Sorena Kiani-Alikhan
- Department of Immunology, Barts and The London National Health Service Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Update: Vaccines in primary immunodeficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2017; 141:474-481. [PMID: 29288077 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.12.980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2017] [Revised: 12/19/2017] [Accepted: 12/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Vaccines were originally developed to prevent or ameliorate infectious disease. As knowledge of immune function and appreciation of immunodeficiency has developed, researchers have used vaccine responses as a tool to characterize the phenotypes of patients exhibiting various syndromes. Thus it has become possible for a clinician to evaluate individual responses to vaccines to interrogate the immunocompetence of their patients. Although there have been many advances in these areas, we still have much to learn about the quantity and quality of humoral and cellular vaccine responses in healthy and immunodeficient subjects and how that knowledge can then be extrapolated to diagnostic purposes. Adverse effects of vaccines have been recognized for many years, especially the occurrence of infections caused by viable vaccine organisms in immunodeficient hosts. Nevertheless, vaccines are essential for disease prevention in immunodeficient patients, just as they are for healthy subjects. Clinicians must understand the appropriate and safe use of vaccines in patients with immunodeficiency. This review highlights some recent advances and ongoing challenges in application of vaccines for the diagnosis and treatment of immunodeficiencies.
Collapse
|
5
|
Sullivan KE, Bassiri H, Bousfiha AA, Costa-Carvalho BT, Freeman AF, Hagin D, Lau YL, Lionakis MS, Moreira I, Pinto JA, de Moraes-Pinto MI, Rawat A, Reda SM, Reyes SOL, Seppänen M, Tang MLK. Emerging Infections and Pertinent Infections Related to Travel for Patients with Primary Immunodeficiencies. J Clin Immunol 2017; 37:650-692. [PMID: 28786026 PMCID: PMC5693703 DOI: 10.1007/s10875-017-0426-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2017] [Accepted: 07/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
In today's global economy and affordable vacation travel, it is increasingly important that visitors to another country and their physician be familiar with emerging infections, infections unique to a specific geographic region, and risks related to the process of travel. This is never more important than for patients with primary immunodeficiency disorders (PIDD). A recent review addressing common causes of fever in travelers provides important information for the general population Thwaites and Day (N Engl J Med 376:548-560, 2017). This review covers critical infectious and management concerns specifically related to travel for patients with PIDD. This review will discuss the context of the changing landscape of infections, highlight specific infections of concern, and profile distinct infection phenotypes in patients who are immune compromised. The organization of this review will address the environment driving emerging infections and several concerns unique to patients with PIDD. The first section addresses general considerations, the second section profiles specific infections organized according to mechanism of transmission, and the third section focuses on unique phenotypes and unique susceptibilities in patients with PIDDs. This review does not address most parasitic diseases. Reference tables provide easily accessible information on a broader range of infections than is described in the text.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen E Sullivan
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3615 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| | - Hamid Bassiri
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3501 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Ahmed A Bousfiha
- Clinical Immunology Unit, Infectious Department, Hopital d'Enfant Abderrahim Harouchi, CHU Ibn Rochd, Laboratoire d'Immunologie Clinique, d'Inflammation et d'Allergie LICIA, Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie, Université Hassan II, Casablanca, Morocco
| | - Beatriz T Costa-Carvalho
- Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of São Paulo, Rua dos Otonis, 725, São Paulo, SP, 04025-002, Brazil
| | - Alexandra F Freeman
- NIAID, NIH, Building 10 Room 12C103, 9000 Rockville, Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - David Hagin
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, University of Tel Aviv, 6 Weizmann St, 64239, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yu L Lau
- Department of Paediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Rm 106, 1/F New Clinical Building, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong.,Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
| | - Michail S Lionakis
- Fungal Pathogenesis Unit, Laboratory of Clinical Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, Room 11C102, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Ileana Moreira
- Immunology Unit, Hospital de Niños Ricardo Gutiérrez, Gallo 1330, 1425, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jorge A Pinto
- Division of Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Av. Alfredo Balena 190, room # 161, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30130-100, Brazil
| | - M Isabel de Moraes-Pinto
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Pedro de Toledo, 781/9°andar, São Paulo, SP, 04039-032, Brazil
| | - Amit Rawat
- Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Shereen M Reda
- Pediatric Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Saul Oswaldo Lugo Reyes
- Immunodeficiencies Research Unit, National Institute of Pediatrics, Av Iman 1, Torre de Investigacion, Piso 9, Coyoacan, 04530, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Mikko Seppänen
- Harvinaissairauksien yksikkö (HAKE), Rare Disease Center, Helsinki University Hospital (HUH), Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mimi L K Tang
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim HW, Lee JH, Cho HK, Lee H, Seo HS, Lee S, Kim KH. Opsonophagocytic Antibodies to Serotype Ia, Ib, and III Group B Streptococcus among Korean Infants and in Intravenous Immunoglobulin Products. J Korean Med Sci 2017; 32:737-743. [PMID: 28378545 PMCID: PMC5383604 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.5.737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2016] [Accepted: 01/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Group B streptococcus (GBS) infection is a leading cause of sepsis and meningitis among infants, and is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality in many countries. Protection against GBS typically involves antibody-mediated opsonization by phagocytes and complement components. The present study evaluated serotype-specific functional antibodies to GBS among Korean infants and in intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) products. An opsonophagocytic killing assay (OPA) was used to calculate the opsonization indices (OIs) of functional antibodies to serotypes Ia, Ib, and III in 19 IVIG products from 5 international manufacturers and among 98 Korean infants (age: 0-11 months). The GBS Ia, Ib, and III serotypes were selected because they are included in a trivalent GBS vaccine formulation that is being developed. The OI values for the IVIG products were 635-5,706 (serotype Ia), 488-1,421 (serotype Ib), and 962-3,315 (serotype III), and none of the IVIG lots exhibited undetectable OI values (< 4). The geometric mean OI values were similar for all 3 serotypes when we compared the Korean manufacturers. The seropositive rate among infants was significantly lower for serotype Ia (18.4%), compared to serotype Ib and serotype III (both, 38.8%). Infant age of ≥ 3 months was positively correlated with the seropositive rates for each serotype. Therefore, only a limited proportion of infants exhibited protective immunity against serotype Ia, Ib, and III GBS infections. IVIG products that exhibit high antibody titers may be a useful therapeutic or preventive measure for infants. Further studies are needed to evaluate additional serotypes and age groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Wool Kim
- Center for Vaccine Evaluation and Study, Medical Research Institute, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hyen Lee
- Center for Vaccine Evaluation and Study, Medical Research Institute, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Pediatrics, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye Kyung Cho
- Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Gachon University, Incheon, Korea
| | - Hyunju Lee
- Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ho Seong Seo
- Biotechnology Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Jeongeup, Korea
| | - Soyoung Lee
- Center for Vaccine Evaluation and Study, Medical Research Institute, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung Hyo Kim
- Center for Vaccine Evaluation and Study, Medical Research Institute, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Pediatrics, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|