1
|
Hemodynamic profiling by critical care echocardiography could be more accurate than invasive techniques and help identify targets for treatment. Sci Rep 2022; 12:7187. [PMID: 35504927 PMCID: PMC9065036 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-11252-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
In this prospective observational study, non-invasive critical care echocardiography (CCE) was used to obtain quantitative hemodynamic parameters in 107 intensive care unit (ICU) patients; the parameters were then visualized in a novel web graph approach to increase the understanding and impact of CCE abnormalities, as an alternative to thermodilution techniques. Visualizing the CCE hemodynamic data in six-dimensional web graph plots was feasible in almost all ICU patients. In 23.1% of patients, significant tricuspid regurgitation prevented correlation between thermodilution techniques and echocardiographic hemodynamics. Two parameters of longitudinal right ventricular function (TAPSE and S') did not correlate in ICU patients. Clinical surrogate parameters of hemodynamic compromise did not correlate with measured hemodynamics. 26.2% of the patients with mean arterial pressures above 60 mmHg had cardiac indices (CI) below 2.5 L min-1·m-2. A CI below 2.2 L·min-1·m-2 was associated with a significant ICU survival disadvantage. CCE was feasible in addition or as an alternative to thermodilution techniques for the hemodynamic evaluation of ICU patients. Six-dimensional web graph plots visualized the hemodynamic states and were especially useful in conditions in which thermodilution methods were not reliable. Hemodynamic CCE identified patients with previously unknown low CI, which correlated with a higher ICU mortality.
Collapse
|
2
|
Jessen MK, Vallentin MF, Holmberg MJ, Bolther M, Hansen FB, Holst JM, Magnussen A, Hansen NS, Johannsen CM, Enevoldsen J, Jensen TH, Roessler LL, Lind PC, Klitholm MP, Eggertsen MA, Caap P, Boye C, Dabrowski KM, Vormfenne L, Høybye M, Henriksen J, Karlsson CM, Balleby IR, Rasmussen MS, Pælestik K, Granfeldt A, Andersen LW. Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy during general anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2022; 128:416-433. [PMID: 34916049 PMCID: PMC8900265 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.10.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Revised: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND During general anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery, there remain knowledge gaps regarding the effect of goal-directed haemodynamic therapy on patient-centred outcomes. METHODS Included clinical trials investigated goal-directed haemodynamic therapy during general anaesthesia in adults undergoing noncardiac surgery and reported at least one patient-centred postoperative outcome. PubMed and Embase were searched for relevant articles on March 8, 2021. Two investigators performed abstract screening, full-text review, data extraction, and bias assessment. The primary outcomes were mortality and hospital length of stay, whereas 15 postoperative complications were included based on availability. From a main pool of comparable trials, meta-analyses were performed on trials with homogenous outcome definitions. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). RESULTS The main pool consisted of 76 trials with intermediate risk of bias for most outcomes. Overall, goal-directed haemodynamic therapy might reduce mortality (odds ratio=0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 1.09) and shorten length of stay (mean difference=-0.72 days; 95% CI, -1.10 to -0.35) but with low certainty in the evidence. For both outcomes, larger effects favouring goal-directed haemodynamic therapy were seen in abdominal surgery, very high-risk surgery, and using targets based on preload variation by the respiratory cycle. However, formal tests for subgroup differences were not statistically significant. Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy decreased risk of several postoperative outcomes, but only infectious outcomes and anastomotic leakage reached moderate certainty of evidence. CONCLUSIONS Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy during general anaesthesia might decrease mortality, hospital length of stay, and several postoperative complications. Only infectious postoperative complications and anastomotic leakage reached moderate certainty in the evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie K Jessen
- Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mikael F Vallentin
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mathias J Holmberg
- Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Cardiology, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark
| | - Maria Bolther
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Johanne M Holst
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Niklas S Hansen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | - Thomas H Jensen
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of North Norway, Narvik, Norway
| | - Lara L Roessler
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Peter C Lind
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Maibritt P Klitholm
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mark A Eggertsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Philip Caap
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Caroline Boye
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Karol M Dabrowski
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lasse Vormfenne
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Maria Høybye
- Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jeppe Henriksen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Carl M Karlsson
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Ida R Balleby
- National Hospital of the Faroe Islands, Torshavn, Faroe Islands, Denmark
| | - Marie S Rasmussen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Kim Pælestik
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark
| | - Asger Granfeldt
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lars W Andersen
- Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chappell D, van der Linden P, Ripollés-Melchor J, James MFM. Safety and efficacy of tetrastarches in surgery and trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Anaesth 2021; 127:556-568. [PMID: 34330414 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.06.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Revised: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130 is a frequently used fluid to replace intravascular losses during surgery or trauma. In the past years, several trials performed in critically ill patients have raised questions regarding the safety of this product. Our aim in this meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 6% HES during surgery and in trauma. METHODS This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42018100379). We included 85 fully published articles from 1980 to June 2018 according to the protocol and three additional recent articles up to June 2020 in English, French, German, and Spanish reporting on prospective, randomised, and controlled clinical trials applying volume therapy with HES 130/0.4 or HES 130/0.42, including combinations with crystalloids, to patients undergoing surgery. Comparators were albumin, gelatin, and crystalloids only. A meta-analysis could not be performed for the two trauma studies as there was only one study that reported data on endpoints of interest. RESULTS Surgical patients treated with HES had lower postoperative serum creatinine (P<0.001) and showed no differences in renal dysfunction, renal failure, or renal replacement therapy. Although there was practically no further difference in the colloids albumin or gelatin, the use of HES improved haemodynamic stability, reduced need for vasopressors (P<0.001), and decreased length of hospital stay (P<0.001) compared with the use of crystalloids alone. CONCLUSIONS HES was shown to be safe and efficacious in the perioperative setting. Results of the present meta-analysis suggest that when used with adequate indication, a combination of intravenous fluid therapy with crystalloids and volume replacement with HES as colloid has clinically beneficial effects over using crystalloids only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Chappell
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Philippe van der Linden
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Brugmann University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Javier Ripollés-Melchor
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Infanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Fluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Group of the Hemostasia, Transfusion Medicine, Fluid Therapy Section of the Spanish Society of Anesthesia and Critical Care (SEDAR), Madrid, Spain
| | - Michael F M James
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Variation in Fluid and Vasopressor Use in Shock With and Without Physiologic Assessment: A Multicenter Observational Study. Crit Care Med 2021; 48:1436-1444. [PMID: 32618697 PMCID: PMC10072792 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000004429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To characterize the association between the use of physiologic assessment (central venous pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, stroke volume variation, pulse pressure variation, passive leg raise test, and critical care ultrasound) with fluid and vasopressor administration 24 hours after shock onset and with in-hospital mortality. DESIGN Multicenter prospective cohort study between September 2017 and February 2018. SETTINGS Thirty-four hospitals in the United States and Jordan. PATIENTS Consecutive adult patients requiring admission to the ICU with systolic blood pressure less than or equal to 90 mm Hg, mean arterial blood pressure less than or equal to 65 mm Hg, or need for vasopressor. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS Of 1,639 patients enrolled, 39% had physiologic assessments. Use of physiologic assessment was not associated with cumulative fluid administered within 24 hours of shock onset, after accounting for baseline characteristics, etiology and location of shock, ICU types, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III, and hospital (beta coefficient, 0.04; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.15). In multivariate analysis, the use of physiologic assessment was associated with a higher likelihood of vasopressor use (adjusted odds ratio, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.45-2.71) and higher 24-hour cumulative vasopressor dosing as norepinephrine equivalent (beta coefficient, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.19-0.55). The use of vasopressor was associated with increased odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.27-2.78). In-hospital mortality was not associated with the use of physiologic assessment (adjusted odds ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.63-1.18). CONCLUSIONS The use of physiologic assessment in the 24 hours after shock onset is associated with increased use of vasopressor but not with fluid administration.
Collapse
|
5
|
Virág M, Leiner T, Rottler M, Ocskay K, Molnar Z. Individualized Hemodynamic Management in Sepsis. J Pers Med 2021; 11:157. [PMID: 33672267 PMCID: PMC7926902 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11020157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 02/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hemodynamic optimization remains the cornerstone of resuscitation in the treatment of sepsis and septic shock. Delay or inadequate management will inevitably lead to hypoperfusion, tissue hypoxia or edema, and fluid overload, leading eventually to multiple organ failure, seriously affecting outcomes. According to a large international survey (FENICE study), physicians frequently use inadequate indices to guide fluid management in intensive care units. Goal-directed and "restrictive" infusion strategies have been recommended by guidelines over "liberal" approaches for several years. Unfortunately, these "fixed regimen" treatment protocols neglect the patient's individual needs, and what is shown to be beneficial for a given population may not be so for the individual patient. However, applying multimodal, contextualized, and personalized management could potentially overcome this problem. The aim of this review was to give an insight into the pathophysiological rationale and clinical application of this relatively new approach in the hemodynamic management of septic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcell Virág
- Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary; (M.V.); (T.L.); (M.R.); (K.O.)
- Szent György University Teaching Hospital of Fejér County, 8000 Székesfehérvár, Hungary
| | - Tamas Leiner
- Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary; (M.V.); (T.L.); (M.R.); (K.O.)
- Anaesthetic Department, North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust, Hinchingbrooke Hospital, Huntingdon PE29 6NT, UK
| | - Mate Rottler
- Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary; (M.V.); (T.L.); (M.R.); (K.O.)
- Szent György University Teaching Hospital of Fejér County, 8000 Székesfehérvár, Hungary
| | - Klementina Ocskay
- Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary; (M.V.); (T.L.); (M.R.); (K.O.)
| | - Zsolt Molnar
- Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary; (M.V.); (T.L.); (M.R.); (K.O.)
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznan, Poland
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Markusovszky Teaching Hospital, 9700 Szombathely, Hungary
- Multidisciplinary Doctoral School, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Saugel B, Flick M, Bendjelid K, Critchley LAH, Vistisen ST, Scheeren TWL. Journal of clinical monitoring and computing end of year summary 2018: hemodynamic monitoring and management. J Clin Monit Comput 2019; 33:211-222. [PMID: 30847738 PMCID: PMC6420447 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-019-00297-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Hemodynamic management is a mainstay of patient care in the operating room and intensive care unit (ICU). In order to optimize patient treatment, researchers investigate monitoring technologies, cardiovascular (patho-) physiology, and hemodynamic treatment strategies. The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing (JCMC) is a well-established and recognized platform for publishing research in this field. In this review, we highlight recent advancements and summarize selected papers published in the JCMC in 2018 related to hemodynamic monitoring and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernd Saugel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Centre of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg- Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Moritz Flick
- Department of Anesthesiology, Centre of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg- Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Karim Bendjelid
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Lester A H Critchley
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shantin, N.T., Hong Kong.,The Belford Hospital, Fort William, The Highlands, Scotland, UK
| | - Simon T Vistisen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Thomas W L Scheeren
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mohindra R, Patel M, Lin S. A new paradigm of resuscitation: Perfusion-guided cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2018; 135:230-231. [PMID: 30445168 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2018] [Accepted: 11/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rohit Mohindra
- Jewish General Hospital Department of Emergency Medicine, 3755 Ch de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Critical Care Research, McGill University, 845 Sherbrook St. W, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| | - Matthew Patel
- The Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephens Green, Dublin 2, D02 YN77, Ireland.
| | - Steve Lin
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond St., Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College St., Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 200 Elizabeth Street, Suite RFE 3-805, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kaufmann T, Clement RP, Scheeren TWL, Saugel B, Keus F, Horst ICC. Perioperative goal-directed therapy: A systematic review without meta-analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2018; 62:1340-1355. [PMID: 29978454 DOI: 10.1111/aas.13212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2018] [Accepted: 06/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative goal-directed therapy aims to optimise haemodynamics by titrating fluids, vasopressors and/or inotropes to predefined haemodynamic targets. Perioperative goal-directed therapy is a complex intervention composed of several independent component interventions. Trials on perioperative goal-directed therapy show conflicting results. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the benefits and harms of perioperative goal-directed therapy. METHODS PubMED, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched. Trials were included if they had a perioperative goal-directed therapy protocol. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The first secondary outcome was serious adverse events excluding mortality. Risk of bias was assessed, and GRADE was used to evaluate quality of evidence. RESULTS One hundred and twelve randomised trials were included of which one trial (1%) had low risk of bias. Included trials varied in patients: types of surgery which was expected due to inclusion criteria; in intervention and comparison: timing of intervention, monitoring devices, haemodynamic variables, target values, use of fluids, vasopressors and/or inotropes as well as combinations of these within protocols; and in outcome: mortality was reported in 87 trials (78%). Due to substantial clinical heterogeneity also within the various types of surgery a meta-analysis of data, including subgroup analyses, as defined in our protocol was considered inappropriate. CONCLUSION Clinical heterogeneity in patients, interventions and outcomes in perioperative goal-directed therapy trials is too large to perform meta-analysis on all trials. Future trials and meta-analyses highly depend on universally agreed definitions on aspects beyond type of surgery of the complex intervention and its evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Kaufmann
- Department of Anesthesiology University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Ramon P. Clement
- Department of Anesthesiology University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Thomas W. L. Scheeren
- Department of Anesthesiology University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Bernd Saugel
- Department of Anesthesiology University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
| | - Frederik Keus
- Department of Critical Care University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Iwan C. C. Horst
- Department of Critical Care University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Perner A, Cecconi M, Cronhjort M, Darmon M, Jakob SM, Pettilä V, van der Horst ICC. Expert statement for the management of hypovolemia in sepsis. Intensive Care Med 2018; 44:791-798. [PMID: 29696295 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5177-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2018] [Accepted: 04/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Hypovolemia is frequent in patients with sepsis and may contribute to worse outcome. The management of these patients is impeded by the low quality of the evidence for many of the specific components of the care. In this paper, we discuss recent advances and controversies in this field and give expert statements for the management of hypovolemia in patients with sepsis including triggers and targets for fluid therapy and volumes and types of fluid to be given. Finally, we point to unanswered questions and suggest a roadmap for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Perner
- Department of Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Maurizio Cecconi
- Department Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Units, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Cronhjort
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Michael Darmon
- Medical ICU, Saint-Louis University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
- ECSTRA Team, Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology, UMR 1153 (Center of Epidemiology and Biostatistic Sorbonne Paris Cité, CRESS), INSERM, Paris, France
- Paris-7 Medical School, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Stephan M Jakob
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bern (Inselspital), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ville Pettilä
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Iwan C C van der Horst
- Department of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pikoulis E, Salem KM, Avgerinos ED, Pikouli A, Angelou A, Pikoulis A, Georgopoulos S, Karavokyros I. Damage Control for Vascular Trauma from the Prehospital to the Operating Room Setting. Front Surg 2017; 4:73. [PMID: 29312951 PMCID: PMC5742177 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2017.00073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2017] [Accepted: 11/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Early management of vascular injury, starting at the field, is imperative for survival no less than any operative maneuver. Contemporary prehospital management of vascular trauma, including appropriate fluid and volume infusion, tourniquets, and hemostatic agents, has reversed the historically known limb hemorrhage as a leading cause of death. In this context, damage control (DC) surgery has evolved to DC resuscitation (DCR) as an overarching concept that draws together preoperative and operative interventions aiming at rapidly reducing bleeding from vascular disruption, optimizing oxygenation, and clinical outcomes. This review addresses contemporary DCR techniques from the prehospital to the surgical setting, focusing on civilian vascular injuries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanouil Pikoulis
- 1st Department of Surgery, Laiko Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Karim M Salem
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Efthymios D Avgerinos
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Anastasia Pikouli
- 1st Department of Surgery, Laiko Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Anastasios Angelou
- 1st Department of Surgery, Laiko Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Antreas Pikoulis
- 1st Department of Surgery, Laiko Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Sotirios Georgopoulos
- 1st Department of Surgery, Laiko Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Karavokyros
- 1st Department of Surgery, Laiko Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Saugel B, Michard F, Scheeren TWL. Goal-directed therapy: hit early and personalize! J Clin Monit Comput 2017; 32:375-377. [PMID: 28653134 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-017-0043-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2017] [Accepted: 06/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Bernd Saugel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| | | | - Thomas W L Scheeren
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|