1
|
Nolan JJ, Forrest J, Ormondroyd E. Additional findings from the 100,000 Genomes Project: A qualitative study of recipient perspectives. Genet Med 2024; 26:101103. [PMID: 38411041 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Participants in the 100,000 Genomes Project, a clinical/research initiative delivered through the UK National Health Service, were offered screening for "additional findings" (AFs): pathogenic/likely pathogenic secondary findings in genes associated with familial hypercholesterolemia or a cancer predisposition syndrome. Understanding the psychological and behavioral responses to secondary findings can inform the clinical utility of a search and disclose policy. METHODS Thirty-two adult AF recipients took part in semi-structured interviews analyzed using deductive and inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS Five themes were constructed: cognitive responses to an AF, emotional and psychological responses, personal control, perceived risk of AF-associated disease, and family implications. Many participants had misunderstood or incompletely remembered consent for AFs, and most were surprised or shocked to receive an AF. Although many ultimately appreciated knowing about the risk conferred, some struggled to make sense of their disease risk, which complicated decision making about risk management, particularly for women with a BRCA AF. Recipients sought control through seeking clinical evaluation and information, and informing relatives. Difficulties with conceptualizing risk and lack of AF-associated disease family history meant that some hesitated to inform relatives. CONCLUSION Genome sequencing programs offering secondary findings require attention to consent processes. Post-disclosure care should aim to promote recipients' perceived personal control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua J Nolan
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jamie Forrest
- Oxford Centre for Genomic Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom; University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth Ormondroyd
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kwong A, Tan DSP, Ryu JM. Current practices and challenges in genetic testing and counseling for women with breast and ovarian cancer in Asia. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2024. [PMID: 38776249 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.14074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024]
Abstract
AIM This study assesses current practices and challenges in genetic testing and counseling (GT and C) for breast cancer gene (BRCA)1/2 mutations in Asia, considering the increased risk of ovarian cancer (OC) and breast cancer (BC) in women carrying these mutations. METHODS Insights were gathered through a questionnaire from breast surgeons, gynecologists, oncologists, and genetic clinicians in 10 Asian countries: Thailand, Hong Kong, South Korea, India, Vietnam, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan, Singapore, and Indonesia. The questionnaire covered their knowledge, attitudes, and practices in GT and C for BRCA1/2 mutations, along with information on perceived gaps and unmet needs in the region. RESULTS A total of 61 specialists participated in the survey. GT and C for BRCA1/2 mutations were less frequently offered in Asia compared to Western countries. Among the guidelines used, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines alone or in combination with other guidelines (American Society of Clinical Oncology [ASCO], National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence [NICE], and European Society for Medical Oncology [ESMO]) were preferred for both BC and OC. Limited access to genetic counselors posed a significant challenge, resulting in delayed or no GT. Pretest genetic counseling was provided by the respondents themselves. Germline testing was preferred for BC, whereas both germline and somatic testing were preferred for OC, with the most preferred option being a multipanel germline test. CONCLUSION Disparities exist in GT and C practices between Asian and Western countries. To address this, steps, such as patient and doctor education, increased accessibility and affordability of GT and C services, and improved infrastructure for identifying gene mutations, should be taken.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ava Kwong
- Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- The Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, Shau Kei Wan, Hong Kong
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Genetics Center, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - David S-P Tan
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore (NCIS), National University Hospital (NUH), Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jai Min Ryu
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mesa-Chavez F, Chavarri-Guerra Y, Aguilar-y-Mendez D, Becerril-Gaitan A, Vaca-Cartagena BF, Carrillo-Bedoya A, Santiesteban-González S, Aranda-Gutierrez A, Rodríguez-Faure A, Obregon-Leal D, Quintero-Beuló G, Rodriguez-Olivares JL, Miaja M, Weitzel JN, Villarreal-Garza C. Uptake of Risk-Reducing Measures, Cascade Testing, and Related Challenges Among Carriers of Breast Cancer-Associated Germline Pathogenic Variants in Mexico. JCO Glob Oncol 2024; 10:e2300417. [PMID: 38635940 PMCID: PMC11191870 DOI: 10.1200/go.23.00417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Genetic cancer risk assessment (GCRA) provides pathogenic variant (PV) carriers with the invaluable opportunity to undertake timely cancer risk-reducing (RR) measures and initiate cascade testing (CT). This study describes the uptake of these strategies and the related barriers among breast cancer-associated germline PV carriers in Mexico. METHODS Carriers who were at least 6 months after disclosure of genetic test results at two GCRA referral centers were invited to answer a survey assessing sociodemographic characteristics, awareness of their carrier status and its implications, uptake of RR measures according to international guidelines by PV, CT initiation, and associated challenges. RESULTS Of the eligible carriers, 246/384 (64%) answered the survey (median age: 44 years). Most were female (88%), married/in domestic partnership (66%), and had personal breast/ovarian cancer history (61%). PVs included BRCA1/2 (75%), CHEK2 (10%), PALB2 (5%), ATM (5%), NF1 (2%), RAD51C (2%), PTEN (1%), and TP53 (1%). Most (87%) participants were aware of their carrier status. When recommended, 37% underwent RR bilateral mastectomy, 48% RR oophorectomy, 70% annual mammogram, and 20% breast magnetic resonance imaging. Challenges hindering the uptake of RR measures included financial limitations (67%), lack of recommendation by their physician (35%), and fear (24%). Nearly all (98%) claimed sharing their results with their relatives. CT was initiated in 63% of families and was associated with carriers being married/in domestic partnership (P = .04) and believing GCRA was useful (P < .001). CONCLUSION Despite the resource-constrained setting, relevant rates of RR measures and CT were observed. Targeted interventions to reduce out-of-pocket expenses and improve patient-physician communication and patients' understanding on carrier status are warranted to enhance the overall benefit of GCRA and ultimately improve the provision of patient-centered care to both carriers and their at-risk relatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernanda Mesa-Chavez
- Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Yanin Chavarri-Guerra
- Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Dione Aguilar-y-Mendez
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Andrea Becerril-Gaitan
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Bryan F. Vaca-Cartagena
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| | | | | | | | - Andrés Rodríguez-Faure
- Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Daniela Obregon-Leal
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| | | | | | - Melina Miaja
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Jeffrey N. Weitzel
- The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, MO
- Latin American School of Oncology, Sierra Madre, CA
| | - Cynthia Villarreal-Garza
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alves-Nogueira AC, Melo D, Carona C, Figueiredo-Dias M. The Psychosocial Impact of the Decision to Undergo Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy Surgery in BRCA Mutation Carriers and the Role of Physician-Patient Communication. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:2429-2440. [PMID: 36826146 PMCID: PMC9955232 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30020185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is an effective prophylactic surgery provided to premenopausal women carrying BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and presenting an increased risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. This procedure is related to physiological, sexual, and psychosocial distress, which altogether increase uncertainty and complexity in the clinical decision-making process and post-surgery adaptation. Physician-patient communication (PPC) has been pointed out as a determinant factor in the decision-making to undergo RRSO, and the subsequent adjustment of women. However, studies examining the psychosocial impact of the decision-making process have been scarce and often lack clear theoretical frameworks. While the role of PPC in such processes has been highlighted in a few qualitative studies, there is a paucity of quantitative research addressing this question. Therefore, this narrative review, conducted using a multidisciplinary approach, was planned to: (1) present an updated medical background for RRSO; (2) analyze the psychosocial impact of the decision-making process within a theoretical framework of the Health Belief Model; and (3) discuss the role of PPC in such a decision-making process and in post-surgery. The collected research also enabled the recommendation of some additions to the existing clinical guidelines and the outlining of future research directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana C. Alves-Nogueira
- Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive and Behavioral Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Rua do Colégio Novo, s/n, 3000-115 Coimbra, Portugal
- Correspondence:
| | - Daniela Melo
- Gynecology Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3004-531 Coimbra, Portugal
- Gynecology Department, Coimbra University Hospital Centre, 3004-561 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Carlos Carona
- Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive and Behavioral Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra, Rua do Colégio Novo, s/n, 3000-115 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Margarida Figueiredo-Dias
- Gynecology Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3004-531 Coimbra, Portugal
- Gynecology Department, Coimbra University Hospital Centre, 3004-561 Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Psychological factors and the uptake of preventative measures in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers: results of a prospective cohort study. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2022; 20:38. [PMID: 36536421 PMCID: PMC9761978 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-022-00244-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women carrying BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants are exposed to elevated risks of developing breast cancer (BC) and are faced by a complex decision-making process on preventative measures, i.e., risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM), and intensified breast surveillance (IBS). In this prospective cohort study we investigated the effect of anxiety, personality factors and coping styles on the decision-making process on risk management options in women with pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2. METHODS Breast cancer unaffected and affected women with a pathogenic variant in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene were psychologically evaluated immediately before (T0), 6 to 8 weeks (T1) and 6 to 8 months (T2) after the disclosure of their genetic test results. Uptake of RRM and IBS was assessed at T2. Psychological data were gathered using questionnaires on risk perception, personality factors, coping styles, decisional conflict, depression and anxiety, including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). We performed tests on statistical significance and fitted a logistic regression based on significance level. RESULTS A total of 98 women were included in the analysis. Baseline anxiety levels in women opting for RRM were high but decreased over time, while they increased in women opting for intensified breast surveillance (IBS). Elevated levels of anxiety after genetic test result disclosure (T1) were associated with the decision to undergo RRM (p < 0.01; OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.05-1.42), while personal BC history and personality factors seemed to be less relevant. CONCLUSIONS Considering psychosocial factors influencing the decision-making process of women with pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 may help improving their genetic and psychological counselling. When opting for IBS they may profit from additional medical and psychological counselling. TRIAL REGISTRATION Retrospectively registered at the German Clinical Trials Register under DRKS00027566 on January 13, 2022.
Collapse
|
6
|
Herold N, Hellmich M, Lichtenheldt F, Ataseven B, Hillebrand V, Wappenschmidt B, Schmutzler RK, Rhiem K. Satisfaction and Quality of Life of Healthy and Unilateral Diseased BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers after Risk-Reducing Mastectomy and Reconstruction Using the BREAST-Q Questionnaire. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13:genes13081357. [PMID: 36011268 PMCID: PMC9407233 DOI: 10.3390/genes13081357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) is the most efficient form of breast cancer (BC) risk reduction in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant (pV) carriers. However, this intervention in physical integrity is associated with significant morbidity. We assessed long-term perception of satisfaction and health-related quality of life (QoL) after bilateral RRM and reconstruction using the validated BREAST-Q. We searched the prospective database of the Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Cologne for previvors and survivors who underwent bilateral RRM from 1994 to 2015 and evaluated the results of their BREAST-Q scores. The study enrolled 43 previvors and 90 survivors after a mean follow-up of 46.3 ± 45.3 months after RRM. Satisfaction and QoL were independent of the technique of RRM or type of reconstruction but depended on the time of RRM. Compared to survivors, previvors had significantly higher mean satisfaction scores in their psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being (chest) in both modules. Among previvors and survivors, higher psychological well-being correlated with a higher satisfaction with information and higher satisfaction with outcome. As psychological well-being correlated with satisfaction with information and outcome, we developed decision aids to improve shared decision making and long-term satisfaction with the decision and the postoperative outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Herold
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.H.); (F.L.); (V.H.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.)
| | - Martin Hellmich
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Frank Lichtenheldt
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.H.); (F.L.); (V.H.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.)
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany;
- Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, 45136 Essen, Germany
| | - Vanessa Hillebrand
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.H.); (F.L.); (V.H.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.)
| | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.H.); (F.L.); (V.H.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.)
| | - Rita Katharina Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.H.); (F.L.); (V.H.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.)
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (N.H.); (F.L.); (V.H.); (B.W.); (R.K.S.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-221-478-98409
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Surgical Outcome Measures in a Cohort of Patients at High Risk of Breast Cancer Treated by Bilateral Risk Reducing Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 150:496e-505e. [PMID: 35749222 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000009383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Women with breast cancer related genetic pathogenic variants (e.g. BRCA1, BRCA2) or with a strong family history carry lifetime risks of developing breast cancer of up to 80-90%. A significant proportion of these women proceed to bilateral risk reducing mastectomy (RRM). We aimed to document the surgical morbidity of RRM and establish whether a diagnosis of breast cancer at the time of surgery impacted on outcomes. METHODS Clinical details of 445 women identified as having >25% lifetime risk of developing breast cancer who underwent RRM and breast reconstruction were interrogated for surgical outcomes such as planned, unplanned and emergency procedures, complication rates, length of stay and longevity of breast reconstruction. These outcome measures were recorded in women diagnosed with breast cancer perioperatively (cancer group, CG) and those without malignancy (benign group, BG). RESULTS Median follow up was similar in both groups (BG, 70months; CG 73 months). Patients were older in the CG than BG (43y v 39y; p<0.001). Women in the CG required more planned procedures to complete reconstruction than those in the BG (4 v 2; p=0.002). Emergency procedures, unplanned surgical interventions (e.g. capsulectomy) and post reconstruction complication rates were similar between groups.One in five women overall required revisional surgery. Patients with autologous reconstructions had a revision rate of 1.24/1000 person years compared with 2.52 in the implant reconstruction group. CONCLUSION Women contemplating RRM can be reassured that this a safe and effective procedure but will likely take multiple interventions. This knowledge should be integral to obtaining informed consent.
Collapse
|
8
|
Chang YJ, Cho S, Joo J, Ryu KH, Lee S, Cho J, Lim MC, Jung SY, Han JH, Lee ES, Kong SY. Differences in Willingness to Undergo BRCA1/2 Testing and Risk Reducing Surgery among the General Public, Cancer Patients, and Healthcare Professionals: A Large Population-Based Survey. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12050818. [PMID: 35629239 PMCID: PMC9147340 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12050818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
We aimed to understand the decision-making process related to the willingness to undergo BRCA1/2 genetic testing, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), or risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) among the general public, cancer patients, and healthcare professionals in South Korea. In total, 3444 individuals (1496 from the general public, 1500 cancer patients, 108 clinicians, and 340 researchers) completed a survey addressing genetic testing and related risk management options in a hypothetical scenario. Differences in intent and associated factors for undergoing the above procedures or sharing test results were analyzed. Overall, 67% of participants were willing to undergo BRCA1/2 testing, with proportions of the general public (58%), cancer patients (70%), clinicians (88%), and researchers (90%). The willingness to undergo RRSO was highest among clinicians (58%), followed by among patients (38%), the general public (33%), and researchers (32%) (p < 0.001). Gender, age, education level, and household income were associated with willingness to undergo genetic testing, RRM, and RRSO (p < 0.05). The intent for undergo genetic testing, RRM, and RRSO were affected by many factors. Finally, 69% of the general public intended to share information with family, while this percentage was 92%, 91%, and 94% for patients, clinicians, and researchers, respectively (p < 0.05). These results highlight the requirement for developing targeted educational materials and counseling strategies for facilitating informed decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoon Jung Chang
- Division of Cancer Control & Policy, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (Y.J.C.); (S.C.)
- Department of Cancer Control and Policy, National Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, Goyang 10408, Korea;
- Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Branch, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Seungyeon Cho
- Division of Cancer Control & Policy, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea; (Y.J.C.); (S.C.)
| | - Jungnam Joo
- Office of Biostatistics Research, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20852, USA;
| | - Kum Hei Ryu
- Center for Cancer Prevention & Detection, National Cancer Center Hospital, Goyang 10408, Korea;
| | - Sangwon Lee
- Cancer Data Center, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea;
| | - Juhee Cho
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea;
- Department of Clinical Research Design and Evaluation, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
- Departments of Health, Behavior and Society and Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Myong Cheol Lim
- Department of Cancer Control and Policy, National Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, Goyang 10408, Korea;
- Immuno-Oncology Branch, Division of Rare and Refractory Cancer, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea;
- Center for Gynecologic Cancer, National Cancer Center Hospital, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - So-Youn Jung
- Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center Hospital, Goyang 10408, Korea; (S.-Y.J.); (J.H.H.)
- Department of Cancer Biomedical Science, National Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, Goyang 10408, Korea
- Cancer Outcome & Quality Improvement Branch, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Jai Hong Han
- Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center Hospital, Goyang 10408, Korea; (S.-Y.J.); (J.H.H.)
| | - Eun Sook Lee
- Immuno-Oncology Branch, Division of Rare and Refractory Cancer, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea;
- Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center Hospital, Goyang 10408, Korea; (S.-Y.J.); (J.H.H.)
| | - Sun-Young Kong
- Cancer Outcome & Quality Improvement Branch, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
- Targeted Therapy Branch, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Goyang 10408, Korea
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +82-31-920-1735
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Berhe R, Spigt M, Schneider F, Paintain L, Adera C, Nigusie A, Gizaw Z, Tesfaye YA, Elnaiem DEA, Alemayehu M. Understanding the risk perception of visceral leishmaniasis exposure and the acceptability of sandfly protection measures among migrant workers in the lowlands of Northwest Ethiopia: a health belief model perspective. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:989. [PMID: 35578331 PMCID: PMC9112482 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13406-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is the leading cause of health concerns among Ethiopian migrant workers. Understanding risk perception and health-protective behavior are significant challenges in the prevention and eradication of the disease. As a result, studies are required to assess these important epidemiological factors, which will provide guidance on how to assist migrant workers in taking preventive measures against VL. Method We conducted qualitative research among migrant workers on seasonal agricultural farms in Northwest Ethiopia between June and November 2019 to assess their perception of the risk of contracting VL and their willingness to use protective measures against the disease. Seventeen focus group discussions and 16 key informant interviews were conducted to study migrant workers’ risk perception in relation to sandfly bite exposure and use of sandfly control measures. For analysis, all interviews were recorded, transcribed, and translated. ATLASti was used to perform qualitative content analysis on the data. Result Migrant workers are fearful of VL because of previous exposure and the disease’s prevalence in the area. They believe, however, that VL is a minor illness that is easily treated. While Insecticide Treated Nets (ITNs) are widely accepted as a protective measure, there are still reservations about using them due to the seasonality of the transmission, difficulties in hanging them on farm areas, and a preference for alternative traditional practices. Regardless of perceived self-efficacy, the central cues were the message delivered by the health workers and an increase in sandfly bite irritation. Based on the findings, three levels of intervention modalities are suggested: 1) increasing pre-arrival awareness through outdoor media (posters, stickers, billboards), 2) encouraging proper use of protective measures upon arrival at farm camps, and 3) informing departing workers on disease recognition and best practices for health-seeking continuous use of protective measures at home. Conclusion This finding suggests that VL prevention interventions should focus on individuals’ perceptions in order to promote consistent use of protective measures. The findings are highly useful in planning effective interventions against VL. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13406-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Resom Berhe
- Department of Health Education and Behavioral Sciences, University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Science, Institute of Public Health, Gondar, Ethiopia.
| | - Mark Spigt
- Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Francine Schneider
- Department of Health Promotion, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Lucy Paintain
- Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Adane Nigusie
- Department of Health Education and Behavioral Sciences, University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Science, Institute of Public Health, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Zemichael Gizaw
- Department of Environmental Health and Safety, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Yihenew Alemu Tesfaye
- Department of Social Anthropology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
| | - Dia-Eldin A Elnaiem
- Department of Natural Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD, USA
| | - Mekuriaw Alemayehu
- Department of Environmental Health and Safety, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Søby AKH, Andersen CM, Bille C, Larsen BF, Heidemann LN, Johansen RA, Timm H, Roessler KK. What do women at high risk of breast cancer request of a patient education day? Focus interviews with women before and after deciding about prophylactic interventions. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022; 31:e13588. [PMID: 35396775 PMCID: PMC9539475 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Revised: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Objective At a Danish Hospital, we wished to establish a co‐designed patient education day about prophylactic interventions for women at high risk of developing breast cancer. However, knowledge is lacking on the women's acceptability and requests for content. The objective of this study is to gain knowledge about the acceptability and requests of the content of a patient education day among women at high risk of breast cancer considering prophylactic mastectomy. Methods A user panel consisting of patients and health care professionals developed an interview guide for two focus interviews with two groups of women at high risk of breast cancer; one group had received a prophylactic mastectomy and one group considered it. Thematic analysis was used to explore the participants' acceptability and requests for content. Results Meaningful content was knowledge about prophylactic interventions, how to share knowledge with partners and children, and talking to equals in a safe forum. Not all participants wished to discuss own surgery in a group setting. Conclusion An education day is an acceptable and supportive format for gaining knowledge about surgery, but since some topics may be vulnerable to discuss in a group setting to some women, we suggest the education day as a valuable supplement to the individual consultations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Camilla Bille
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Helle Timm
- National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Investigating men's motivations to engage in genetic screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0265387. [PMID: 35303741 PMCID: PMC8932559 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are associated with an increased risk of developing numerous cancers, including breast, ovarian, pancreatic, melanoma and prostate cancer. Men face BRCA-related cancer risks as women do. However, there is considerably less research on the psychological determinants of men engaging in BRCA1/2-related cancer prevention compared to women. The present research aimed to study the determinants of men’s motivations to engage in genetic screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2 through the lens of the Health Action Process Approach. One hundred and twenty-five men (mean age = 58.53 y/o, SD = 10.37) completed an online survey. The intention to undergo genetic screening for BRCA1/2 mutations in men was significantly and positively associated with self-efficacy and risk perception. Moreover, having offspring positively affected intention as well. The relationships between intention (and planning) and positive outcome expectancies, age, and family history of breast-related cancer were not statistically significant. Most information on BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is tailored to women due to the availability of effective surgical risk reduction procedures for women’s breast and ovarian cancer. Future research should focus on the best methods of communicating informed decision-making for men facing the risk of such mutations.
Collapse
|
12
|
Liu YL, Breen K, Catchings A, Ranganathan M, Latham A, Goldfrank DJ, Grisham RN, Long Roche K, Frey MK, Chi DS, Abu-Rustum N, Aghajanian C, Offit K, Stadler ZK. Risk-Reducing Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy for Ovarian Cancer: A Review and Clinical Guide for Hereditary Predisposition Genes. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:201-209. [PMID: 34582274 PMCID: PMC8932494 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Pathogenic germline variants underlie up to 20% of ovarian cancer (OC) and are associated with varying degrees of risk for OC. For mutations in high-penetrance genes such as BRCA1/2, the role of risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in cancer prevention is well-established and improves mortality. However, in moderate-penetrance genes where the degree of risk for OC is less precisely defined, the role of RRSO is more controversial. Although national guidelines have evolved to incorporate gene-specific recommendations, studies demonstrate significant variations in practice. Given this, our multidisciplinary group has reviewed the available literature on risk estimates for genes associated with OC, incorporated levels of evidence, and set thresholds for consideration of RRSO. We found that the benefit of RRSO is well-established for pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 as well as BRIP1 and RAD51C/D where the risk of OC is elevated beyond our threshold for RRSO. In PALB2, RRSO is particularly controversial as newer studies consistently demonstrate an increased risk of OC that is dependent on family history, making uniform recommendations challenging. Additionally, new guidelines for Lynch syndrome provide gene-specific risks, questioning the role of RRSO, and even hysterectomy, for MSH6 and PMS2 mutation carriers. Given these uncertainties, shared decision making should be used around RRSO with discussion of individual risk factors, family history, and adverse effects of surgery and premature menopause. Herein, we provide a clinical guide and counseling points.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying L. Liu
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY,Ying L. Liu, MD, MPH, Gynecologic Medical Oncology Clinical Genetics Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East 66th St, 1309 New York, NY 10065; e-mail:
| | - Kelsey Breen
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Amanda Catchings
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Megha Ranganathan
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Alicia Latham
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY,General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Deborah J. Goldfrank
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Rachel N. Grisham
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Melissa K. Frey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Dennis S. Chi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Nadeem Abu-Rustum
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Carol Aghajanian
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Zsofia K. Stadler
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Attitude towards hereditary cancer risk management among women with cancer in Taiwan. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:3625-3632. [PMID: 35028717 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06742-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk management intentions prior to genetic counseling predict risk management uptake following genetic testing. Limited studies examined the attitude and understanding towards genetic counseling/testing in underserved countries. The purposes of this study were to explore knowledge and attitude towards genetic counseling, testing, and risk management for breast and ovarian cancer, and to understand the factors influencing risk management intentions in women with cancer in Taiwan. METHODS Cross-sectional with correlational design was used in this study. Participants were enrolled for genetic testing based on clinical criteria suspected of having hereditary cancer. Survey was conducted using a standardized questionnaire including (1) demographics and personal/family history of cancer; (2) prior experience or consideration of genetic testing and reasons for not considering; (3) perception and attitude towards genetic counseling; and (4) intentions for risk management with a hypothetical BRCA1 mutation status. Multinomial logistic regression was used to analyze the predictors of participants' intentions for cancer risk management strategies. RESULTS A total of 430 women with cancer were analyzed in which 51.6% had family history of cancer in first-degree relatives. Only 30.7% had considered genetic testing and 28.4% had known about genetic counseling prior to the study. When prompted with the services of genetic counseling, the attitude towards genetic counseling was fairly positive (score of 19.8 ± 2.9 out of 25). Given hypothetical BRCA1 mutation status, enhanced breast cancer screening with annual breast MRI was much more accepted than cancer risk reducing interventions. More positive attitude towards genetic counseling (each score point increase) was associated with higher odds of intention for breast MRI (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.32) and preventive tamoxifen (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.22). Having considered genetic testing prior to the study was associated with higher odds of intention for all four risk management strategies: breast MRI (OR 2.99, 95% CI 1.46-6.11), preventive tamoxifen (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.00-3.17), risk-reducing mastectomy (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.13-4.42), and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.27-6.93). CONCLUSION Knowledge of genetic testing and positive attitude towards genetic counseling were associated with increased willingness to consider cancer risk management strategies for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Given the limited knowledge on genetic testing and counseling in the studied population, increasing public awareness of these services may increase adoption of the risk management strategies.
Collapse
|
14
|
Jennings B, Ramis MA, Kynoch K, Jagasia N. Information needs of women undergoing gynaecological risk reduction surgery: Applying patient-reported findings to improve service delivery. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2021; 62:286-293. [PMID: 34751946 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women with genetic mutations including BRCA1, BRCA2 and Lynch syndrome are at increased risk of developing gynaecological cancers with management options including surveillance and/or risk reduction surgery. Little is known about the information women require to inform their decisions around having risk reduction surgery, the implication this surgery has for them and the timing preferences to receive this information. AIMS To identify the information needs of women who are considering or who have had risk reduction surgery due to having a diagnosed or suspected genetic mutation with subsequent increased risk of developing gynaecological cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS A pilot survey was undertaken in a tertiary, metropolitan hospital as part of a service improvement project. Women referred to the gynaecology-oncology service for gynaecological risk reduction surgery between January to December 2018 were invited to participate through completing either online or hard copy versions of a 12-item survey. RESULTS A response rate of 60% (n = 32) was obtained from women between 27 and 77 years of age. Key information topics included sexuality and intimacy (90.6%; n = 29), the surgery itself (87.5%; n = 28) and surgical menopause (87.5%; n = 28). Over 90% (n = 31) of respondents stated they preferred to receive information about surgery pre-operatively and in written format (81.3%; n = 26). The importance of a multidisciplinary approach was recognised with women wanting information from allied health practitioners such as physiotherapists and social workers. CONCLUSIONS Findings have enabled a better understanding of the type, timing and content of information desired by women making complex decisions about risk reduction surgery. Results have contributed to developing an information resource which will more adequately assist women to meet their information needs when considering gynaecological risk reduction surgery in our hospital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mary-Anne Ramis
- Mater Health, Raymond Terrace, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kathryn Kynoch
- Evidence in Practice Unit, Mater Health, Raymond Terrace, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Nisha Jagasia
- Mater Health, Raymond Terrace, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Decision-making for Risk-reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in Southeast Asian BRCA Mutation Carriers With Breast Cancer: A Qualitative Study. Int J Behav Med 2021; 29:1-13. [PMID: 33791992 DOI: 10.1007/s12529-021-09984-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in Asian countries is variable despite being the most effective option for ovarian cancer risk reduction in BRCA mutation carriers. Exploration of factors which may impact the RRSO decision-making of BRCA mutation carriers from Malaysia, a developing country in Southeast Asia, was undertaken. METHODS In-depth interviews with 28 Malaysian BRCA mutation carriers with a history of breast cancer were conducted in addition to observing their RRSO decision-making consultations in the clinic. RESULTS The decision-making considerations among the carriers were centered around the overarching theme of "Negotiating cancer risk and womanhood priorities," with the following themes: (1) risk perception, (2) self-preservation, (3) motherhood obligation, and (4) the preciousness of marriage. Cognitive knowledge of BRCA risk was often conceptualized based on personal and family history of cancer, personal beliefs, and faith. Many women reported fears that RRSO would affect them physically and emotionally, worrying about the post-surgical impact on their motherhood responsibilities. Nevertheless, some reported feeling obliged to choose RRSO for the sake of their children. For some, their husband's support and approval were critical, with emotional well-being and sexuality reportedly perceived as important to sustaining married life. Despite reporting hesitancy toward RRSO, women's decisions about choosing this option evolved as their priorities changed at different stages of life. CONCLUSIONS Recognizing during clinic encounters with Malaysian women that RRSO decision-making involves negotiating the likelihood of developing cancer with the societal priorities of being a woman, mother, and wife may serve to support their decision-making.
Collapse
|
16
|
Sa'at H, Lee YK, Yoon SY, Wong SW, Woo YL, Barlow-Stewart K, Mohd Taib NA. The needs of Southeast Asian BRCA mutation carriers considering risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: a qualitative study. Fam Cancer 2021; 21:21-33. [PMID: 33604745 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-021-00232-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
The decision to have risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) by BRCA mutation carriers to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer is difficult. The choice involves trade-offs in terms of its risks and benefits. To date, understanding the decision-making needs of RRSO among Southeast Asian BRCA mutation carriers is limited. This study aimed to explore the decision-making needs of Malaysian BRCA mutation carriers as an exemplar for the Southeast Asian community. In-depth interviews and clinic observations were conducted with 31 BRCA mutation carriers and analysed thematically. The core theme identified was 'Coping with complex information and alleviating uncertainties' with the following subthemes: (1) the need for an adjustment period, (2) information support, (3) social support and, (4) religious support. We found that women required time to accept their BRCA mutation status before they were ready to make a risk-reducing choice; that understanding complex genetic information and multiple risk management options can be an overwhelming experience; and obtaining further information and a second opinion were challenging. Many described the need for experiential information from other peer-carriers who had undergone RRSO. Support from their spouse and family members was thought to be essential for them to feel reassured with their decision. Many relied on religion to positively cope with cancer risk and cancer worry; Muslim BRCA carriers sought religious guidance through prayers and Islamic fatwas to feel more certain about their RRSO decision. These findings underscore the importance of the provision of resources and support that includes input from peers, husband, family members and religion to underpin the decision-making needs of Malaysian BRCA mutation carriers considering RRSO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamizah Sa'at
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Yew-Kong Lee
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Sook-Yee Yoon
- Cancer Research Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Siu Wan Wong
- Cancer Research Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Yin Ling Woo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Kristine Barlow-Stewart
- Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nur Aishah Mohd Taib
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
- University of Malaya Cancer Institute, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Marcinkute R, Woodward ER, Gandhi A, Howell S, Crosbie EJ, Wissely J, Harvey J, Highton L, Murphy J, Holland C, Edmondson R, Clayton R, Barr L, Harkness EF, Howell A, Lalloo F, Evans DG. Uptake and efficacy of bilateral risk reducing surgery in unaffected female BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. J Med Genet 2021; 59:133-140. [PMID: 33568438 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Revised: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women testing positive for BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants have high lifetime risks of breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer. The effectiveness of risk reducing surgery (RRS) has been demonstrated in numerous previous studies. We evaluated long-term uptake, timing and effectiveness of risk reducing mastectomy (RRM) and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in healthy BRCA1/2 carriers. METHODS Women were prospectively followed up from positive genetic test (GT) result to censor date. χ² testing compared categorical variables; Cox regression model estimated HRs and 95% CI for BC/ovarian cancer cases associated with RRS, and impact on all-cause mortality; Kaplan-Meier curves estimated cumulative RRS uptake. The annual cancer incidence was estimated by women-years at risk. RESULTS In total, 887 women were included in this analysis. Mean follow-up was 6.26 years (range=0.01-24.3; total=4685.4 women-years). RRS was performed in 512 women, 73 before GT. Overall RRM uptake was 57.9% and RRSO uptake was 78.6%. The median time from GT to RRM was 18.4 months, and from GT to RRSO-10.0 months. Annual BC incidence in the study population was 1.28%. Relative BC risk reduction (RRM versus non-RRM) was 94%. Risk reduction of ovarian cancer (RRSO versus non-RRSO) was 100%. CONCLUSION Over a 24-year period, we observed an increasing number of women opting for RRS. We showed that the timing of RRS remains suboptimal, especially in women undergoing RRSO. Both RRM and RRSO showed a significant effect on relevant cancer risk reduction. However, there was no statistically significant RRSO protective effect on BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruta Marcinkute
- Clinical Genetics Service, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Emma Roisin Woodward
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Ashu Gandhi
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Sacha Howell
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Breast Centre, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Emma J Crosbie
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, St Mary's Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Julie Wissely
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - James Harvey
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Lindsay Highton
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - John Murphy
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Cathrine Holland
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard Edmondson
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, St Mary's Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard Clayton
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Lester Barr
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Elaine F Harkness
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Anthony Howell
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Breast Centre, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Clinical Genetics Service, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK .,Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Universities Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,NW Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wei G, Kumar A, Lee MC, Wang X. Influential Factors on Risk-reduction Mastectomy in a High-risk Breast Cancer Population With Genetic Predispositions. Clin Breast Cancer 2021; 21:e427-e433. [PMID: 33712364 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Revised: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carriers of deleterious mutations in breast cancer predisposition genes are presented with critical choices regarding cancer risk management. Risk-reduction mastectomy is a major preventative strategy in this population. Understanding the decision-making process for prophylactic mastectomy is essential in patient-centered care for high-risk carriers and patients with breast cancer. We sought to provide insight into influential factors underlying preventative surgery decisions among individuals with high breast cancer risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective chart review of pathogenic carriers of high-risk breast cancer genes who presented to the Moffitt GeneHome clinic between March 2017 and June 2020. Associations between preventative mastectomy choice and influence variables were analyzed via unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models. RESULTS Of 258 high-risk mutation carriers, 104 (40.3%) underwent risk-reduction mastectomy. A significantly higher proportion of mastectomy patients reported prior history of breast cancer (68.9% vs. 16.5%; P < .001) and history of other risk-reduction or noncancer-related surgeries (61.7% vs. 25.8%; P < .001). Significant predictors affecting surgery decision included previous breast cancer history (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 10.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.59-19.63; P < .0001), other risk-reduction or noncancer-related surgical history (aOR, 4.65; 95% CI, 2.28-9.47; P < .0001), and age at presentation to the genetics clinic (< 35 years old: aOR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.04-7.4; P = .042; 35-55 years old: aOR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.19-5.18; P = .016). CONCLUSIONS Preventive mastectomy decisions are highly personal and complex. In our sample, we observed prior history or concurrent breast cancer, history of other risk-reduction surgery or noncancer-related surgery, and younger age at presentation to the GeneHome clinic to be predictive of mastectomy uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Wei
- MD Program, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL
| | - Ambuj Kumar
- Center for Evidence-based Medicine and Health Outcomes Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | - Marie Catherine Lee
- Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Xia Wang
- GeneHome Hereditary Cancer Screening Clinic, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Park SY, Kim Y, Kim S. Factors associated with the decision to undergo risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among women at high risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a systematic review. KOREAN JOURNAL OF WOMEN HEALTH NURSING 2020; 26:285-299. [PMID: 36312308 PMCID: PMC9328615 DOI: 10.4069/kjwhn.2020.11.19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Revised: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This systematic review aims to identify factors associated with risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), including the uptake rate and decision timing, among women at high risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). Methods We found 4,935 relevant studies using MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO on July 6, 2020. Two authors screened the articles and extracted data. Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. Quality assessment of articles was conducted using the Risk of Bias for Nonrandomized Studies tool. Results Five types of factors were identified (demographic factors, clinical factors, family history of cancer, psychological factors, and objective cancer risk). The specific significant factors were older age, having child(ren), being a BRCA1/2 carrier, mastectomy history, perceived risk for ovarian cancer, and perceived advantages of RRSO, whereas objective cancer risk was not significant. The uptake rate of RRSO was 23.4% to 87.2% (mean, 45.2%) among high-risk women for HBOC. The mean time to decide whether to undergo RRSO after BRCA testing was 4 to 34 months. Conclusion RRSO decisions are affected by demographic, clinical, and psychological factors, rather than objective cancer risk. Nonetheless, women seeking RRSO should be offered information about objective cancer risk. Even though decision-making for RRSO is a complex and multifaceted process, the psychosocial factors that may influence decisions have not been comprehensively examined, including family attitudes toward RRSO, cultural norms, social values, and health care providers’ attitudes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sun-young Park
- Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
- National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
| | - Youlim Kim
- Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
- Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute and College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sue Kim
- Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute and College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
- Corresponding author: Sue Kim College of Nursing, Yonsei University, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea Tel: +82-2228-3276 E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Skrovanek E, Dunbar-Jacob J, Dunwoody C, Wesmiller S. Integrative Review of Reproductive Decision Making of Women Who Are BRCA Positive. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2020; 49:525-536. [PMID: 32926832 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogn.2020.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To synthesize research findings about reproductive decision making among women who are BRCA positive. DATA SOURCES PubMed and CINAHL. STUDY SELECTION Articles published in English between 2000 and June 28, 2020, about the reproductive decision making of women with a confirmed BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. DATA EXTRACTION We extracted data about participants, study design, analysis, follow-up, and results. We used the modified Downs and Black checklist and Kennelly's qualitative data analysis to rate studies for quality and applicability by using. DATA SYNTHESIS We included five of 257 screened articles in our synthesis. The total sample size of the five studies was 1,468 women. The most prevalent factors related to reproductive decision making were the impending decisions regarding childbearing and family choices, including decisions about biological children, preventive surgery, preimplantation genetic diagnosis, and prenatal diagnosis to prevent further transmission of a BRCA mutation, and family planning. CONCLUSION A lack of knowledge exists about the reproductive decision-making processes of women who are BRCA positive. A better understanding of this process would provide nurses and other clinicians with the knowledge needed to support these women through their reproductive life choices.
Collapse
|
21
|
Ladd MK, Peshkin BN, Senter L, Baldinger S, Isaacs C, Segal H, Philip S, Phillips C, Shane K, Martin A, Weinstein V, Pilarski R, Jeter J, Sweet K, Hatten B, Wurtmann EJ, Phippen S, Bro D, Schwartz MD. Predictors of risk-reducing surgery intentions following genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Transl Behav Med 2020; 10:337-346. [PMID: 30418620 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/iby101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) and salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) are increasingly used to reduce breast and ovarian cancer risk following BRCA1/BRCA2 testing. However, little is known about how genetic counseling influences decisions about these surgeries. Although previous studies have examined intentions prior to counseling, few have examined RRM and RRSO intentions in the critical window between genetic counseling and test result disclosure. Previous research has indicated that intentions at this time point predict subsequent uptake of surgery, suggesting that much decision-making has taken place prior to result disclosure. This period may be a critical time to better understand the drivers of prophylactic surgery intentions. The aim of this study was to examine predictors of RRM and RRSO intentions. We hypothesized that variables from the Health Belief Model would predict intentions, and we also examined the role of affective factors. Participants were 187 women, age 21-75, who received genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. We utilized multiple logistic regression to identify independent predictors of intentions. 49.2% and 61.3% of participants reported intentions for RRM and RRSO, respectively. Variables associated with RRM intentions include: newly diagnosed with breast cancer (OR = 3.63, 95% CI = 1.20-11.04), perceived breast cancer risk (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.17-1.81), perceived pros (OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.38-2.32) and cons of RRM (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.65-0.996), and decision conflict (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66-0.98). Variables associated with RRSO intentions include: proband status (OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.09-0.89), perceived pros (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.11-1.63) and cons of RRSO (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.59-0.89), and ambiguity aversion (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.65-0.95). These data provide support for the role of genetic counseling in fostering informed decisions about risk management, and suggest that the role of uncertainty should be explored further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Kathleen Ladd
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.,Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Beth N Peshkin
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.,Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Leigha Senter
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine and Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Shari Baldinger
- Virgina Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Claudine Isaacs
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.,Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Hannah Segal
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.,Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Samantha Philip
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.,Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Chloe Phillips
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.,Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Kate Shane
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine and Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Aimee Martin
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.,Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Veronique Weinstein
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.,Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Robert Pilarski
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine and Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Joanne Jeter
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine and Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Kevin Sweet
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine and Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Bonnie Hatten
- Virgina Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN
| | | | - Shanda Phippen
- Virgina Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Della Bro
- Virgina Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Marc D Schwartz
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.,Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wolyniec K, Sharp J, Lazarakis S, Mileshkin L, Schofield P. Understanding and information needs of cancer patients regarding treatment‐focused genomic testing: A systematic review. Psychooncology 2020; 29:632-638. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.5351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Revised: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kamil Wolyniec
- Department of Psychological SciencesSwinburne University of Technology Hawthorn Victoria Australia
- Department of Cancer Experiences ResearchPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Jessica Sharp
- Department of Statistics Data Science and EpidemiologySwinburne University of Technology Hawthorn Victoria Australia
| | - Smaro Lazarakis
- Health Sciences LibraryRoyal Melbourne Hospital Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Linda Mileshkin
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyUniversity of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Psychological SciencesSwinburne University of Technology Hawthorn Victoria Australia
- Department of Cancer Experiences ResearchPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyUniversity of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Parker WM, Hennig K, Burton-Chase AM. For Women, Lynch Syndrome Is About More than Colon Cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2019; 12:831-836. [PMID: 31554630 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-19-0069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Revised: 05/13/2019] [Accepted: 09/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Lynch syndrome, also known as hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, has historically been characterized by a predisposition to colorectal cancer; however, for women with Lynch syndrome, the risks for gynecologic cancers pose an equal or greater risk than colorectal cancer. In addition, the gynecologic cancer is often the first cancer that presents in these patients. Also of importance to women with Lynch syndrome is the efficacy of gynecologic cancer screening being significantly lower than colorectal cancer screening, leading to inconsistency in provider recommendations for gynecologic screening and surveillance. We had the chance to listen to women with Lynch syndrome, in their own words, discuss their health care experiences as they relate to gynecologic cancer risk, and identified several important themes. They describe feeling confused about their screening and surveillance options while also being heavily reliant on their health care providers for guidance. In addition, women with Lynch syndrome discuss attempting to balance medical management of Lynch syndrome with their reproductive choices. Finally, they believe that increased awareness by women and their providers about the gynecologic cancer risks associated with Lynch syndrome should be a higher priority. We view the words of these women as a call to action for Lynch syndrome patients, clinicians, researchers, and advocates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy M Parker
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, New York.
| | - Kelsey Hennig
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, New York
| | - Allison M Burton-Chase
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, New York
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Manoukian S, Alfieri S, Bianchi E, Peissel B, Azzollini J, Borreani C. Risk‐reducing surgery in
BRCA1
/
BRCA2
mutation carriers: Are there factors associated with the choice? Psychooncology 2019; 28:1871-1878. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.5166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Revised: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Siranoush Manoukian
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and HematologyFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Milan Italy
| | - Sara Alfieri
- Clinical Psychlogy UnitFondazione IRCSS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Milan Italy
| | - Elisabetta Bianchi
- Clinical Psychlogy UnitFondazione IRCSS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Milan Italy
| | - Bernard Peissel
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and HematologyFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Milan Italy
| | - Jacopo Azzollini
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and HematologyFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Milan Italy
| | - Claudia Borreani
- Clinical Psychlogy UnitFondazione IRCSS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Milan Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rebitschek FG, Pashayan N, Widschwendter M, Wegwarth O. Do cancer risk and benefit-harm ratios influence women's consideration of risk-reducing mastectomy? A scenario-based experiment in five European countries. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0218188. [PMID: 31188874 PMCID: PMC6561593 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2019] [Accepted: 05/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Personal cancer risk assessments enable stratified care, for example, offering preventive surgical measures such as risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) to women at high risk for breast cancer. In scenario-based experiments, we investigated whether different benefit-harm ratios of RRM influence women's consideration of this, whether this consideration is influenced by women's perception of and desire to know their personal cancer risk, or by their intention to take a novel cancer risk-predictive test, and whether consideration varies across different countries. METHOD In January 2017, 1,675 women 40 to 75 years of age from five European countries-Czech Republic, Germany, UK, Italy, and Sweden-took part in an online scenario-based experiment. Six different scenarios of hypothetical benefit-harm ratios of RRM were presented in accessible fact box formats: Baseline risk/risk reduction pairings were 20/16, 20/4, 10/8, 10/2, 5/4, and 5/1 out of 1,000 women dying from breast cancer. RESULTS Varying the baseline risk of dying from breast cancer and the extent of risk reduction influenced the decision to consider RRM for 23% of women. Decisions varied by country, risk perception, and the intention to take a cancer risk-predictive test. Women who expressed a stronger intention to take such a test were more likely to consider having RRM. The desire to know one's risk of developing any female cancer in general moderated women's decisions, whereas the specific desire to know the risk of breast cancer did not. CONCLUSIONS In this hypothetical scenario-based study, only for a minority of women did the change in benefit-harm ratio inform their consideration of RRM. Because this consideration is influenced by risk perception and the intention to learn one's cancer risks via a cancer risk-predictive test, careful disclosure of different potential preventive measures and their benefit-harm ratios is necessary before testing for individual risk. Furthermore, information on risk testing should acknowledge country-specific sensitivities for benefit-harm ratios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix G. Rebitschek
- Harding Center for Risk Literacy, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Nora Pashayan
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Odette Wegwarth
- Harding Center for Risk Literacy, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
- Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Concerns and Expectations of Risk-Reducing Surgery in Women with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8030313. [PMID: 30841601 PMCID: PMC6463153 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8030313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2018] [Revised: 02/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome (HBOC) carriers face complex decisions, which might affect their fertility and body image. Using an anonymous 40-items questionnaire we evaluated the expectations and concerns about Risk-Reducing Surgery (RRS) in 204 carriers. Participants are well-informed about the options to manage cancer risk, and women with previous cancer are more concerned with screening failure. Satisfaction with RR Mastectomy is high, even if many carriers are unsatisfied with reconstructed breast feel and nipple-areola complex tactile sensation and those with previous breast cancer report a change in their sexual habits. The decrease of libido and vaginal dryness are the most complained symptoms after RR Salpingo-Oophorectomy. Nevertheless, most carriers would choose RRS again, due to cancer risk or screening-related stress reduction. Women who deferred RRS are more afraid of menopausal symptoms and cancer risk than those who had undergone or declined surgery. Women who declined RRS feel well-informed and trust screening procedures. In conclusion, HBOC carriers consider themselves well-informed and able to choose the best option for their condition, would choose RRS again because of cancer risk and screening-related stress reduction, and those who delay RRS face a higher preoperative level of concern and need support.
Collapse
|
27
|
Machirori M, Patch C, Metcalfe A. Black and Minority Ethnic women's decision-making for risk reduction strategies after BRCA testing: Use of context and knowledge. Eur J Med Genet 2018; 62:376-384. [PMID: 30550831 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Revised: 11/30/2018] [Accepted: 12/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Within the field of breast cancer care, women concerned about their family history are offered genetic testing and subsequent treatment options based on several factors which include but are not limited to personal and family cancer disease histories and clinical guidelines. Discussions around decision-making in genetics in Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) groups are rarely documented in literature, and information regarding interactions with genetics services is usually discussed and linked to lack of scientific knowledge. As such, counselling sessions based only on scientific and medical information miss out the many reasons participants consider in making health decisions, information which can be used to encourage BME women to engage in cancer genetics services. 10 BME women with a mixed personal and family history of breast and ovarian cancer backgrounds, were interviewed in a study exploring issues of knowledge about familial breast cancer syndromes, to understand how they created and used familial knowledge for health decisions, with a particular focus on attitudes towards risk reducing strategies. Study results show that our participants are not unique in the ways they make decisions towards the use of cancer genetics and risk reduction strategies and as such, there are no specific ethnically defined pathways for decision-making. Our participants demonstrated mixed biomedical, social and individual cultural reasons for their decision-making towards risk reduction surgeries and treatment options which are similar to women from different ethnicities and are individual rather than group-specific. Narratives about suspicion of scientific utility of genetic knowledge, the perceived predictive value of mutations for future cancers or the origin of mutations and family disease patterns feature heavily in how participants evaluated genetic information and treatment decisions. The diversity of results shows that our participants are interested in engaging with genetic information but use multiple sources for evaluating the extent of involvement in genetic services and the place of genetic information and treatment options for themselves and their families. Genetic information is considered within various bio-social scenarios before decision-making for risk reduction is undertaken. BME women are shown to undertake evaluative processes which clinicians are encouraged to explore for better patient support. Continuing to focus on links between superficial and un-representative meanings of ethnicity, ethnic identity and attitudes and behaviours by only searching for differences between ethnic groups, are unhelpful in further understanding how women from those diverse backgrounds make decisions towards risk reduction interventions. Future research must find ways of investigating and understanding populations in ways that are not focussed solely on ethnic differences but on how meaning is created out of social circumstances and experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mavis Machirori
- King's College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Christine Patch
- King's College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alison Metcalfe
- King's College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, London, United Kingdom; Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Herrmann A, Hall A, Proietto A. Using the Health Belief Model to explore why women decide for or against the removal of their ovaries to reduce their risk of developing cancer. BMC Womens Health 2018; 18:184. [PMID: 30428865 PMCID: PMC6236993 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-018-0673-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Accepted: 10/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women at an increased risk of ovarian cancer often have to decide for or against the surgical removal of their healthy ovaries to reduce their cancer risk. This decision can be extremely difficult. Despite this, there is a lack of guidance on how to best support women in making this decision. Research that is guided by theoretical frameworks is needed to help inform clinical practice. We explored the decision-making process of women who are at an increased risk of developing ovarian cancer and had to decide for or against the removal of their ovaries. METHODS A qualitative study of 18 semi-structured interviews with women who have attended a cancer treatment centre or cancer counselling and information service in New South Wales, Australia. Data collection and analysis were informed by the Health Belief Model (HBM). Data was analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS The paper describes women's decision making with the help of the four constructs of the HBM: perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, and perceived barriers. The more anxious and susceptible women felt about getting ovarian cancer, the more likely they were to have an oophorectomy. Women's anxiety was often fuelled by witnessing family members suffer or die from cancer. Women considered a number of barriers and potential benefits to having the surgery but based their decision on "gut feeling" and experiential factors, rather than statistical risk assessment. Age, menopausal status and family commitments seemed to influence but not determine women's decisions on oophorectomy. Women reported a lack of decision support and appreciated if their doctor explained their treatment choice, provided personalised information, involved their general practitioner in the decision-making process and offered a second consultation to follow-up on any questions women might have. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that deciding on whether to have an oophorectomy is a highly personal decision which can be described with the help of the HBM. The results also highlight the need for tailored decision support which could help improve doctor-patient-communication and patient-centred care related to risk reducing surgery in women at an increased risk of ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Herrmann
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, University of Newcastle and Hunter Medical Research Institute, University Drive, Callaghan, 2308 Australia
| | - Alix Hall
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, University of Newcastle and Hunter Medical Research Institute, University Drive, Callaghan, 2308 Australia
| | - Anthony Proietto
- Cancer Services and Cancer Network, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Graham R, Owens M, Priest H, Hutton S. Constructions of Decision Making for Risk-Reducing Mastectomy. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2018; 28:1595-1609. [PMID: 30016926 DOI: 10.1177/1049732318785372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
This research article explores constructions of the decision-making process for risk-reducing mastectomy and considers the consequent role and responsibility of clinical psychologists. Using a Foucauldian discourse analysis approach, three online newspaper articles, five online forums, and four semi-structured interviews were analyzed. Seven discursive constructions are identified and discussed within three broader discourses of mental illness, risk, and embodied selves. Primary conclusions highlight the role for clinical psychologists and health professionals to incorporate the multiple social and political factors involved in discourses that shape decision making. The role of power is critically considered and there is a need for further analysis of "talk" among health professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Graham
- 1 Staffordshire and Keele Universities, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Marilyn Owens
- 2 Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Stafford, United Kingdom
| | - Helena Priest
- 1 Staffordshire and Keele Universities, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Stephanie Hutton
- 3 North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare NHS Trust, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Inadequate Rates of BRCA Testing with its Negative Consequences for Women with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer and their Families: an Overview of the Literature. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:472-483. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2017] [Accepted: 04/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
31
|
Padamsee TJ, Muraveva A, Yee LD, Wills CE, Paskett ED. Experiencing the cancer of a loved one influences decision-making for breast cancer prevention. J Health Psychol 2017; 25:1064-1075. [PMID: 29243522 DOI: 10.1177/1359105317746480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Prior research demonstrates that family history influences breast cancer prevention decisions among healthy women at elevated risk of the disease. Drawing on in-depth interviews with 50 African American and White women, this study reveals an important psychological mechanism of this relationship: exposure to cancer among loved ones. Four distinct categories of cancer exposure (Abstract, Generalized, Practical, and Traumatic), distinguished by the characteristics of women's experiences with cancer among family members and close friends, are associated with differences in knowledge and decisions about breast cancer prevention options. Racial differences and distinct experiences among those with BRCA mutations are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lisa D Yee
- City of Hope National Medical Center, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Braude L, Kirsten L, Gilchrist J, Juraskova I. A systematic review of women's satisfaction and regret following risk-reducing mastectomy. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2017; 100:2182-2189. [PMID: 28732648 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2017] [Revised: 06/14/2017] [Accepted: 06/25/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies, to describe patient satisfaction and regret associated with risk-reducing mastectomies (RRM), and the patient-reported factors associated with these among women at high risk of developing breast cancer. METHODS Studies were identified using Medline, CINAHL, Embase and PsycInfo databases (1995-2016). Data were extracted and crosschecked for accuracy. Article quality was assessed using standardised criteria. RESULTS Of the 1657 unique articles identified, 30 studies met the inclusion criteria (n=23 quantitative studies, n=3 qualitative studies, n=4 mixed-method studies). Studies included were cross-sectional (n=23) or retrospective (n=7). General satisfaction with RRM, decision satisfaction and aesthetic satisfaction were generally high, although some women expressed regret around their decision and dissatisfaction with their appearance. Factors associated with both patient satisfaction and regret included: post-operative complications, body image changes, psychological distress and perceived inadequacy of information. CONCLUSION While satisfaction with RRM was generally high, some women had regrets and expressed dissatisfaction. Future research is needed to further explore RRM, and to investigate current satisfaction trends given the ongoing improvements to surgical and clinical practice. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Offering pre-operative preparation, decisional support and continuous psychological input may help to facilitate satisfaction with this complex procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Braude
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Laura Kirsten
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Nepean Cancer Care Centre, Sydney West Cancer Network, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Ilona Juraskova
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Successful Repatriation of Breast Cancer Surveillance for High-Risk Women to the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme. Clin Breast Cancer 2017; 18:282-288. [PMID: 29191429 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2017] [Revised: 09/29/2017] [Accepted: 10/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since April 2013, the UK's National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) centers have been obliged to provide services for women at the highest risk of breast cancer, including those carrying highly penetrant single gene mutations (BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53). Since then, such individuals previously undergoing surveillance in the Royal Marsden Hospital were referred to their local NHSBSP centers. We aimed to assess patient experience of surveillance provided by local NHSBSP services at 1 and 3 years after repatriation. PATIENTS AND METHODS High-risk gene mutation carriers referred to the NHSBSP for breast cancer surveillance were identified from a departmental database in the Cancer Genetics Unit and invited to complete questionnaires about their experience of surveillance under this new pathway, first in 2014 and again in 2016. RESULTS Three hundred forty-six individuals were invited to participate in 2014, of whom 182 responded (53%). A total of 464 patients were invited in 2016, of whom 246 (53%) completed the second questionnaire. Ninety-four percent of patients with residual breast tissue received some screening at the first (n = 161) and second (n = 185) time points. Ninety-one percent of patients (n = 146) received at least recommended surveillance in the year preceding the initial survey, a proportion decreasing slightly by the second time point (n = 164, 87%). Seventeen percent of individuals required additional diagnostic investigations, with cancers detected in 2%. These proportions remained stable between surveys. CONCLUSION Repatriation of high-risk individuals from Royal Marsden Hospital to NHSBSP centers has been successfully accomplished. Most individuals received appropriate recommended annual surveillance. Further improvements are required to ensure equal and timely provision of recommended surveillance.
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Women carrying germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 have significantly increased lifetime risks of breast and tubo-ovarian cancer. To manage the breast cancer risk women may elect to have breast screening by MRI/mammogram from age 30, to take risk-reducing medication, or to have a prophylactic bilateral mastectomy. To manage the tubo-ovarian cancer risk, the only effective strategy is to have a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, recommended by age 40 (BRCA1) or 'around' age 40 (BRCA2). Early studies suggested that uptake of these cancer risk-reducing strategies was low. More recent studies have revealed higher rates of uptake, however it is unclear whether uptake is genuinely improving or whether the higher uptake rates reflect changes in the populations studied. In this study we surveyed 193 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers in the state of Tasmania to determine the uptake of cancer risk-reducing strategies and what factors might influence women's decisions in relation to both gynaecological and breast surgery. We observed that uptake of risk management strategies varied depending on the strength of the recommendation in the national guidelines. Uptake rates were > 90% for strategies which are strongly recommended, such as breast screening by MRI/mammogram and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and were unaffected by demographic factors such as socio-economic disadvantage and educational achievement. Uptake rates were much lower for strategies which are presented in the guidelines as options for consideration and where patient choice and shared decision making are encouraged, such as prophylactic mastectomy (29%) and chemoprevention (1%) and in the case of prophylactic mastectomy, were influenced by both socio-economic advantage and educational achievement.
Collapse
|
35
|
A Psychological Perspective on Factors Predicting Prophylactic Salpingo-Oophorectomy in a Sample of Italian Women from the General Population. Results from a Hypothetical Study in the Context of BRCA Mutations. J Genet Couns 2017; 26:1144-1152. [PMID: 28337671 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0093-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2016] [Accepted: 03/06/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess attitudes toward ovarian cancer risk management options for BRCA mutation carriers in healthy Italian women, and to identify predictors of the preference for risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) over surveillance. One hundred eighty-one women aged 30-45 completed a questionnaire about preferences, knowledge, risk perception, and socio-demographic information. Participants were randomly presented with a pamphlet about BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation-specific testing, consequences of testing and preventive options for carriers, and they were stratified by having children or not and by age group. Surveillance was the preferred option (64.6%), followed by RRSO (24.3%). Although RRSO is the only effective strategy available to BRCA carriers, most healthy women faced for the first time with this option may not consider it as their preferred choice. Predictors associated with a higher likelihood to prefer surgery over surveillance were: knowing that life expectancy is longer with surgery, perceived comprehension of the consequences of testing, previous knowledge about BRCA testing, anticipated worry about developing cancer, and feelings of risk. Childbearing intentions and the effect of childbearing intentions on choice were associated with a lower preference for surgery. Further research is needed to confirm the role of the factors identified in this study in order to promote informed decision-making about RRSO.
Collapse
|
36
|
Dean M, Rauscher EA. “It was an Emotional Baby”: Previvors’ Family Planning Decision-Making Styles about Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk. J Genet Couns 2017; 26:1301-1313. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0069-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2016] [Accepted: 01/15/2017] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|
37
|
Amara N, Blouin-Bougie J, Jbilou J, Halilem N, Simard J, Landry R. The knowledge value-chain of genetic counseling for breast cancer: an empirical assessment of prediction and communication processes. Fam Cancer 2016; 15:1-17. [PMID: 26334522 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-015-9835-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this paper is twofold: to analyze the genetic counseling process for breast cancer with a theoretical knowledge transfer lens and to compare generalists, medical specialists, and genetic counselors with regards to their genetic counseling practices. This paper presents the genetic counseling process occurring within a chain of value-adding activities of four main stages describing health professionals' clinical practices: (1) evaluation, (2) investigation, (3) information, and (4) decision. It also presents the results of a cross-sectional study based on a Canadian medical doctors and genetic counselors survey (n = 176) realized between July 2012 and March 2013. The statistical exercise included descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA and post-hoc tests. The results indicate that even though all types of health professionals are involved in the entire process of genetic counseling for breast cancer, genetic counselors are more involved in the evaluation of breast cancer risk, while medical doctors are more active in the decision toward breast cancer risk management strategies. The results secondly demonstrate the relevance and the key role of genetic counselors in the care provided to women at-risk of familial breast cancer. This paper presents an integrative framework to understand the current process of genetic counseling for breast cancer in Canada, and to shed light on how and where health professionals contribute to the process. It also offers a starting point for assessing clinical practices in genetic counseling in order to establish more clearly where and to what extent efforts should be undertaken to implement future genetic services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nabil Amara
- Department of Management, Pavillon Palasis-Prince, Laval University, 2325, rue de la Terrasse, Local 1516, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
| | - Jolyane Blouin-Bougie
- Department of Management, Pavillon Palasis-Prince, Laval University, 2325, rue de la Terrasse, Local 1516, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
| | - Jalila Jbilou
- New Brunswick Medical Training Centre and School of Psychology, University of Monction, Moncton, NB, Canada.
| | - Norrin Halilem
- Department of Management, Pavillon Palasis-Prince, Laval University, 2325, rue de la Terrasse, Local 1516, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
| | - Jacques Simard
- Cancer Genomics Laboratory, Department of Molecular Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.
| | - Réjean Landry
- Department of Management, Pavillon Palasis-Prince, Laval University, 2325, rue de la Terrasse, Local 1516, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
van Driel CMG, Oosterwijk JC, Meijers-Heijboer EJ, van Asperen CJ, Zeijlmans van Emmichoven IA, de Vries J, Mourits MJE, Henneman L, Timmermans DRM, de Bock GH. Psychological factors associated with the intention to choose for risk-reducing mastectomy in family cancer clinic attendees. Breast 2016; 30:66-72. [PMID: 27639031 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2016] [Revised: 08/30/2016] [Accepted: 08/30/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Women seeking counseling because of familial breast cancer occurrence face difficult decisions, such as whether and when to opt for risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) in case of BRCA1/2 mutation. Only limited research has been done to identify the psychological factors associated with the decision for RRM. This study investigated which psychological factors are related to the intention to choose for RRM. MATERIALS & METHODS A cohort of 486 cancer-unaffected women with a family history of breast cancer completed the following questionnaires prior to genetic counseling: the Cancer Worry Scale, Positive And Negative Affect Scale, Perceived Personal Control Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and State Anxiety Scale and questions regarding socio-demographic characteristics, family history, risk perception and RRM intention. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the relation between psychological factors and women's intention to choose for RRM. RESULTS Factors associated with RRM intention were high positive affect (OR = 1.86, 95%CI = 1.12-3.08), high negative affect (OR = 2.52, 95%CI = 1.44-4.43), high cancer worry (OR = 1.65, 95%CI = 1.00-2.72), high perceived personal control (OR = 3.58, 95%CI = 2.18-5.89), high risk-perception (OR = 1.85, 95%CI = 1.15-2.95) and having children (OR = 2.06, 95%CI = 1.21-3.50). CONCLUSION Negative and positive affects play an important role in the intention for RRM. Furthermore, perceived personal control over the situation is associated with an intention for RRM. In addition to focusing on accurate risk communication, counseling should pay attention to the influence of perceived control and emotions to facilitate decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M G van Driel
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - J C Oosterwijk
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - E J Meijers-Heijboer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C J van Asperen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - I A Zeijlmans van Emmichoven
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J de Vries
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - M J E Mourits
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - L Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands; EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D R M Timmermans
- EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Public and Occupational Health, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G H de Bock
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Harmsen MG, Arts-de Jong M, Horstik K, Manders P, Massuger LFAG, Hermens RPMG, Hoogerbrugge N, Woldringh GH, de Hullu JA. Very high uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: A single-center experience. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 143:113-119. [PMID: 27430397 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.07.104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2016] [Revised: 06/09/2016] [Accepted: 07/12/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is the only effective surgical strategy to reduce the increased risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Given the long-term health consequences of premature surgical menopause, we need insight in uptake and timing of RRSO to guide us in improving healthcare. METHODS A single-center retrospective cohort study of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers diagnosed and counseled at the multidisciplinary Family Cancer Clinic of the Radboud university medical center in Nijmegen, The Netherlands, between 1999 and 2014. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze uptake and timing of RRSO. RESULTS Data of 580 BRCA1/2 were analyzed. The uptake of RRSO among mutation carriers who are currently above the upper limit of the recommended age for RRSO, is 98.5% and 97.5% for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, respectively. The vast majority undergoes RRSO ≤40 (BRCA1) or ≤45 (BRCA2) years of age, provided that mutation status is known by that age: 90.8% and 97.3% of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The uptake of RRSO among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers who were counseled at our Family Cancer Clinic is extremely high. High uptake might be largely attributed to the directive and uniform way of counseling by professionals at our Family Cancer Clinic. Given the fact that RRSO is often undergone at premenopausal age in our population, future research should focus on minimizing long-term health consequences of premature surgical menopause either by optimization of hormone replacement therapy or by investigating alternative strategies to RRSO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M G Harmsen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - M Arts-de Jong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - K Horstik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - P Manders
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - L F A G Massuger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - R P M G Hermens
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - N Hoogerbrugge
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - G H Woldringh
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J A de Hullu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Smits S, Boivin J, Menon U, Brain K. The double-edged sword of ovarian cancer information for women at increased risk who have previously taken part in screening. Ecancermedicalscience 2016; 10:650. [PMID: 27433283 PMCID: PMC4929978 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2016.650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women at increased risk who decide not to have, or to delay, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy have to rely on early diagnosis through symptom awareness and presenting to primary care as soon as possible in the absence of screening. However, little is known about the acceptability to women of this strategy. We aimed to gain an in-depth understanding of women's perceptions and previous experiences of ovarian cancer symptom management, and the influences on ovarian cancer awareness and anticipated symptom presentation. METHOD Qualitative interviews were conducted with eight women at increased risk of ovarian cancer who had previously taken part in ovarian cancer screening and analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). RESULTS Familial experience of ovarian cancer and perceived personal risk shaped women's perceptions and behavioural responses to disease threat. Ovarian cancer information was perceived to be a double-edged sword, regarded as either useful for increasing knowledge and confidence in discussing symptom concerns with health professionals or to be avoided due to fears about cancer. CONCLUSION Women may be cautious about searching for information independently and in the absence of routine ovarian screening. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Thought needs to be given to how best to create and disseminate credible ovarian cancer symptom information materials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Smits
- Divison of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Neuadd, Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4YS, United Kingdom
| | - Jacky Boivin
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, United Kingdom
| | - Usha Menon
- Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London W1T 7DN, United Kingdom
| | - Kate Brain
- Divison of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Neuadd, Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4YS, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Seenandan-Sookdeo KAI, Hack TF, Lobchuk M, Murphy L, Marles S. Parental Decision Making Regarding the Disclosure or Nondisclosure of a Mutation-Positive BRCA1/2 Test Result to Minors. Oncol Nurs Forum 2016; 43:330-41. [PMID: 27105194 DOI: 10.1188/16.onf.330-341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES To gain insight into parental decision making regarding the disclosure or nondisclosure of a mutation-positive BRCA1/2 test result to minors.
. RESEARCH APPROACH A qualitative study based on Heidegger hermeneutic phenomenology was undertaken to explore the lived experience of parental decision making regarding high-risk BRCA1/2 disclosure.
. SETTING The study's recruitment site was a western Canadian hereditary breast and ovarian cancer clinic.
. PARTICIPANTS Fifteen female mutation-positive BRCA1/2 carriers who had at least one child aged 6-18 years.
. METHODOLOGIC APPROACH The use of a demographic questionnaire, semistructured interviews, and conversation summaries were employed to gain an understanding of participants' lived experience. van Manen's selective approach was used to conduct a thematic analysis.
. FINDINGS Collectively, parents wanted clinicians to discuss implications of disclosing and not disclosing a mutation-positive BRCA1/2 test result to minors in greater detail. The findings were categorized under the following emergent themes. CONCLUSIONS Participants' stories identified the need for auxiliary support pertaining to the decision-making process and suggested ways in which parental support may be coordinated.
. INTERPRETATION Oncology nurses with advanced genetics training should assist mutation-positive BRCA1/2 carriers in meeting their genetic risk information needs; this requires nurses to stay informed about a multitude of issues that affect this population of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas F Hack
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Vetter L, Keller M, Bruckner T, Golatta M, Eismann S, Evers C, Dikow N, Sohn C, Heil J, Schott S. Adherence to the breast cancer surveillance program for women at risk for familial breast and ovarian cancer versus overscreening: a monocenter study in Germany. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 156:289-99. [PMID: 26960712 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3748-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2016] [Accepted: 03/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the leading cancer among women worldwide and in 5-10 % of cases is of hereditary origin, mainly due to BRCA1/2 mutations. Therefore, the German Consortium for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) with its 15 specialized academic centers offers families at high risk for familial/hereditary cancer a multimodal breast cancer surveillance program (MBCS) with regular breast MRI, mammography, ultrasound, and palpation. So far, we know a lot about the psychological effects of genetic testing, but we know little about risk-correlated adherence to MBCS or prophylactic surgery over time. The aim of this study was to investigate counselees' adherence to recommendations for MBCS in order to adjust the care supply and define predictors for incompliance. All counselees, who attended HBOC consultation at the University Hospital Heidelberg between July 01, 2009 and July 01, 2011 were eligible to participate. A tripartite questionnaire containing sociodemographic information, psychological parameters, behavioral questions, and medical data collection from the German consortium were used. A high participation rate was achieved among the study population, with 72 % returning the questionnaire. This study showed a rate of 59 % of full-adherers to the MBCS. Significant predictors for partial or full adherence were having children (p = 0.0221), younger daughters (p = 0.01795), a higher awareness of the topic HBOC (p = 0.01795, p < 0.0001), a higher perceived breast cancer risk (p < 0.0001), and worries (p = 0.0008)/impairment (p = 0.0257) by it. Although the current data suggest a good adherence of MBCS, prospective studies are needed to understand counselees' needs to further improve surveillance programs and adherence to them. Adherence to the breast cancer surveillance program for women at risk for familial breast and ovarian cancer versus overscreening-a monocenter study in Germany.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Vetter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Monika Keller
- Department of Psychosomatic, Internal Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Bruckner
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Golatta
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sabine Eismann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christina Evers
- Institute of Human Genetics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nicola Dikow
- Institute of Human Genetics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christof Sohn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sarah Schott
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- DKTK, German Cancer Research Center, DKFZ Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kelly KM, Ellington L, Schoenberg N, Jackson T, Dickinson S, Porter K, Leventhal H, Andrykowski M. Genetic counseling content: How does it impact health behavior? J Behav Med 2015; 38:766-76. [PMID: 25533642 PMCID: PMC4478279 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-014-9613-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2014] [Accepted: 12/08/2014] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Women with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer face decisions about screening (transvaginal ultrasound, CA125, mammography, breast exams) and proactive (before cancer) or reactive (after cancer) surgery (oophorectomy, mastectomy). The content of genetic counseling and its relation to these key health behaviors is largely unexamined. Ashkenazi Jewish women (n = 78) were surveyed through the process of genetic testing and had audiorecorded counseling sessions available for Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count analysis. Proportions for participant and counselor cognitive and affective content during sessions were used as primary predictor variables in linear mixed models for change in intentions for screening and treatment and in self-reported screening. Cognitive and affective content were important predictors of behavior. Counselor cognitive content was associated with ovarian screening. An interaction effect also emerged for CA-125, such that counselor cognitive content plus participant cognitive content or counselor affective content were associated with more screening. Teasing out the factors in risk communication that impact decision-making are critical, and affect from a risk communicator can spur action, such as cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly M Kelly
- Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center and School of Pharmacy, Health Science Center, West Virginia University, PO Box 9510, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.
| | - Lee Ellington
- College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Nancy Schoenberg
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Thomas Jackson
- Department of Statistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | | | - Kyle Porter
- Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Howard Leventhal
- Institute for Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Michael Andrykowski
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Etchegary H, Dicks E, Watkins K, Alani S, Dawson L. Decisions about prophylactic gynecologic surgery: a qualitative study of the experience of female Lynch syndrome mutation carriers. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2015; 13:10. [PMID: 25806095 PMCID: PMC4371629 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-015-0031-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2014] [Accepted: 03/10/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Women who carry a mutation for Lynch syndrome face complex decisions regarding strategies for managing their increased cancer risks. At present, there is limited understanding of the factors influencing women’s prophylactic surgery decisions. Methods As part of an exploratory pilot project, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 women who were Lynch syndrome mutation carriers and had made prophylactic surgery decisions. Nine of 10 women had chosen to undergo prophylactic hysterectomy and/or oophorectomy as a means of managing their increased gynecological cancer risks. Results Study findings revealed that surgery decisions were influenced by multiple factors, including demographic variables such as age and parity, as well as psychosocial factors such as cancer worry, in addition to personal and social knowledge of gynecological cancer. While all women were satisfied with their surgery decision, some reported they were not fully informed about the negative impact on their quality of life post-surgery (e.g., complications of surgically-induced menopause), nor about the potential for, or risks and benefits of, hormone replacement therapy. Conclusions Study findings highlight some of the factors associated with prophylactic surgery decisions and women’s perceptions about pre-surgical information provision and needs. Suggestions are made for improving the information and support provided to female carriers of a Lynch syndrome mutation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Etchegary
- Division of Medicine, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Memorial University Health Sciences Centre, Patient Research Centre, Room 1414 300 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John's, A1B 3V6 NL Canada
| | - Elizabeth Dicks
- Center for Health Informatics & Analytics (CHIA) Health Sciences Centre, Room 1756 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. John's, A1B 3V6 NL Canada
| | - Kathy Watkins
- Centre for Nursing Studies, Southcott Hall, 100 Forest Road, St. John's, A1A 1E5 NL Canada
| | - Sabrina Alani
- Department of Oncology, Memorial University, St. John's, A1B 3V6 NL Canada
| | - Lesa Dawson
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Memorial University, 300 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John's, A1B 3V6 NL Canada
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Witt J, Elwyn G, Wood F, Rogers MT, Menon U, Brain K. Adapting the coping in deliberation (CODE) framework: a multi-method approach in the context of familial ovarian cancer risk management. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2014; 97:200-210. [PMID: 25064250 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2013] [Revised: 06/28/2014] [Accepted: 07/03/2014] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To test whether the coping in deliberation (CODE) framework can be adapted to a specific preference-sensitive medical decision: risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in women at increased risk of ovarian cancer. METHODS We performed a systematic literature search to identify issues important to women during deliberations about RRSO. Three focus groups with patients (most were pre-menopausal and untested for genetic mutations) and 11 interviews with health professionals were conducted to determine which issues mattered in the UK context. Data were used to adapt the generic CODE framework. RESULTS The literature search yielded 49 relevant studies, which highlighted various issues and coping options important during deliberations, including mutation status, risks of surgery, family obligations, physician recommendation, peer support and reliable information sources. Consultations with UK stakeholders confirmed most of these factors as pertinent influences on deliberations. Questions in the generic framework were adapted to reflect the issues and coping options identified. CONCLUSIONS The generic CODE framework was readily adapted to a specific preference-sensitive medical decision, showing that deliberations and coping are linked during deliberations about RRSO. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Adapted versions of the CODE framework may be used to develop tailored decision support methods and materials in order to improve patient-centred care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Witt
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- Dartmouth Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Hanover, NH, USA; Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Fiona Wood
- Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Usha Menon
- Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kate Brain
- Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ristevski E, Regan M, Birks D, Steers N, Byrne A. A qualitative study of rural women's views for the treatment of early breast cancer. Health Expect 2014; 18:2928-40. [PMID: 25267503 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/05/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Identify what factors rural women perceived to influence their surgical choice for EBC. BACKGROUND Higher rates of mastectomy still remain for women with early breast cancer (EBC) in rural areas. While access to radiotherapy is a commonly identified barrier, there is growing debate around other factors which are also important influences on surgical choice. METHODS Qualitative study with 70 interviews with women diagnosed with EBC in rural Gippsland, Australia. Twenty-nine women had a mastectomy and 41 had breast conserving surgery (BCS). RESULTS Patient led psychosocial and surgeon led factors influenced surgical choice. Psychosocial factors were a greater influence for the mastectomy group. These included a high fear of cancer recurrence and radiotherapy, negative views of the body and breast, a family history of cancer, wanting to avoid the negative treatment experiences they had seen significant others go through, and not wanting to travel for treatment. Surgeon led factors were a greater influence for the BCS group, in particular, the direct recommendation made by the surgeon for BCS. For both groups, urgency to act was a shared psychosocial factor. Trust and confidence in the expertise and reputation of the surgeon and their consultation style were surgeon led factors shared by the groups. CONCLUSIONS To ensure women achieve the best treatment outcome, patients and clinicians need to work together to identify how important and influential the various factors are for the women and, if necessary, to seek support to ensure informed decisions are made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eli Ristevski
- Monash University, School of Rural Health - Monash University Department of Rural and Indigenous Health, Moe, Victoria, Australia
| | - Melanie Regan
- Monash University, School of Rural Health - Monash University Department of Rural and Indigenous Health, Moe, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Birks
- Monash University, School of Rural Health - Churchill, Churchill, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nicole Steers
- Latrobe Community Health Service, Morwell, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anny Byrne
- West Gippsland HealthCare Group, Warragul, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Jbilou J, Halilem N, Blouin-Bougie J, Amara N, Landry R, Simard J. Medical genetic counseling for breast cancer in primary care: a synthesis of major determinants of physicians' practices in primary care settings. Public Health Genomics 2014; 17:190-208. [PMID: 24993835 DOI: 10.1159/000362358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2013] [Accepted: 03/20/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This paper aims to identify relevant potential predictors of medical genetic counseling for breast cancer (MGC-BC) in primary care and to develop a comprehensive questionnaire to study MGC-BC. METHODS A scoping review was conducted to identify the predictors of MGC-BC among primary care physicians. Relevant articles were identified in selected databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, ISI Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Cochrane CENTRAL) and 4 selected relevant electronic journals. RESULTS An inductive analysis of the 193 quantitatively tested variables, conducted by 3 researchers, showed that 6 conceptual categories of determinants, namely (1) demographic, (2) organizational, (3) experiential, (4) professional, (5) psychological, and (6) cognitive, influence MGC-BC practices. CONCLUSION There is a scarcity of literature addressing the medical behavior determinants of MGC-BC. Future research is needed to identify effective strategies put into action to support the integration of MGC-BC in primary care medical practices and routines. However, our results shed light on 2 levels of actions that could improve genetic counseling services in primary care: (1) medical training and educational efforts emphasizing family history collection (individual level), and (2) clarification of roles and responsibilities in ordering and referral practices in genetic counseling and genetic testing for better healthcare management (organizational level).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jalila Jbilou
- Centre de formation médicale du Nouveau-Brunswick, Université de Moncton, Moncton, N.B., Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Underhill ML, Crotser CB. Seeking balance: decision support needs of women without cancer and a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. J Genet Couns 2014; 23:350-62. [PMID: 24271037 PMCID: PMC4138835 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9667-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2013] [Accepted: 10/30/2013] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Recommendations for women with a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation include complex medical approaches related to cancer risk reduction and detection. Current science has not yet fully elucidated decision support needs that women face when living with medical consequences associated with known hereditary cancer risk. The purpose of this study was to describe health communication and decision support needs in healthy women with BRCA1/2 gene mutations. The original researchers completed an interpretive secondary qualitative data analysis of 23 phenomenological narratives collected between 2008 and 2010. The Ottawa Decision Support and Patient Centered Communication frameworks guided the study design and analysis. Women described a pattern wherein breast and ovarian cancer risk, health related recommendations and decisions, and personal values were prioritized over time based on life contexts. Knowing versus acting on cancer risk was not a static process but an ongoing balancing act of considering current and future personal and medical values, further compounded by the complexity of recommendations. Women shared stories of anticipatory, physical and psychosocial consequences of the decision making experience. The findings have potential to generate future research questions and guide intervention development. Importantly, findings indicate a need for ongoing, long-term, support from genetics professionals and decision support interventions, which challenges the current practice paradigm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan L Underhill
- The Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing & Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, L522, Boston, MA, 02115, USA,
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Jeffers L, Morrison PJ, McCaughan E, Fitzsimons D. Maximising survival: the main concern of women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer who undergo genetic testing for BRCA1/2. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2014; 18:411-8. [PMID: 24731853 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2014] [Revised: 03/10/2014] [Accepted: 03/13/2014] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Little is known about how women with hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer who test positive for a BRCA gene manage the impact of a positive test result on their everyday lives and in the longer term. This study defined the experience and needs of women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and a positive BRCA test over time. METHODS A grounded theory approach was taken using qualitative interviews (n = 49) and reflective diaries. Data collected from December 2006 until March 2010 was analysed using the constant comparative technique to trace the development of how women manage their concerns of inherited cancer. RESULTS A four stage substantive theory of maximising survival was generated that defines the experience of women and how they resolve their main concerns. The process of maximising survival begins prior to genetic testing in women from high risk families as they expect to get a cancer diagnosis at some time. Women with cancer felt they had experienced the worst with a cancer diagnosis and altruistically tested for the sake of their children but a positive test result temporarily shifted their focus to decision-making around their personal health needs. CONCLUSION This study adds to clinical practice through raising awareness and adding insights into how women cope with living with inherited cancer risk and the personal and familial ramifications that ensue from it. A clear multi-professional structured care pathway for women from genetic testing result disclosure to undergoing risk-reducing surgery and/or surveillance should be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Jeffers
- Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Department of Genetics, Belfast City Hospital, Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AB, UK.
| | - Patrick J Morrison
- Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Department of Genetics, Belfast City Hospital, Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AB, UK
| | - Eilis McCaughan
- Institute of Nursing Research, University of Ulster, Coleraine BT52 1SA, UK
| | - Donna Fitzsimons
- Institute of Nursing Research, University of Ulster, Jordanstown BT37 0QB, UK; Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast City Hospital, Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because of the significantly increased lifetime risk of ovarian cancer associated with inheritance of a germline mutation in the BRCA1/2 genes, women with a deleterious mutation are recommended to undergo risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy at age 35 years or once child-bearing is complete. Significant time is often spent by nurses trained in genetics providing counseling to improve the decision-making process. The decision to undergo surgery is complex and laden with several sources of uncertainty. OBJECTIVE We conducted a qualitative study among female carriers of deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations to address these uncertainties. METHODS Twelve qualitative interviews were conducted with women who had received a positive BRCA1/2 test result to explore their understanding of ovarian cancer risk, prevention options, and resource needs. Qualitative content analysis was performed. RESULTS Significant information gaps in level of risk, other factors associated with ovarian cancer, and details of prophylactic oophorectomy were identified. Personal experience with cancer colored the degree of risk perception associated with the inherited mutation. Fear of the adverse effects of surgical menopause, both physiological and psychosocial, was common. Women expressed interest in hearing from other women facing the same decision. CONCLUSIONS Women facing the decision to undergo risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy have several information gaps and unmet needs despite comprehensive counseling. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Based on our findings, we make specific recommendations that will guide nursing practice and future research.
Collapse
|