1
|
Gebremeskel TG, Romeo F, Shama AT, Bonevski B, Trigg J. Facilitators and Barriers to Lung Cancer Screening during Long COVID: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Study Synthesis of Qualitative Research. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 21:534. [PMID: 38791759 PMCID: PMC11121223 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21050534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 12/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
Background: Participation in targeted screening reduces lung cancer mortality by 30-60%, but screening is not universally available. Therefore, the study aimed to synthesize the evidence and identify facilitators and barriers to lung cancer screening participation globally. Methods: Two reviewers screened primary studies using qualitative methods published up to February 2023. We used two-phase synthesis consistent with a meta-study methodology to create an interpretation of lung cancer screening decisions grounded in primary studies, carried out a thematic analysis of group themes as specific facilitators and barriers, systematically compared investigations for similarities and differences, and performed meta-synthesis to generate an expanded theory of lung cancer screening participation. We used the Social Ecological Model to organize and interpret the themes: individual, interpersonal, social/cultural, and organizational/structural levels. Results: Fifty-two articles met the final inclusion criteria. Themes identified as facilitating lung cancer screening included prioritizing patient education, quality of communication, and quality of provider-initiated encounter/coordination of care (individual patient and provider level), quality of the patient-provider relationship (interpersonal group), perception of a life's value and purpose (cultural status), quality of tools designed, and care coordination (and organizational level). Themes coded as barriers included low awareness, fear of cancer diagnosis, low perceived benefit, high perceived risk of low-dose computerized tomography, concern about cancer itself, practical obstacle, futility, stigma, lack of family support, COVID-19 fear, disruptions in cancer care due to COVID-19, inadequate knowledge of care providers, shared decision, and inadequate time (individual level), patient misunderstanding, poor rapport, provider recommendation, lack of established relationship, and confusing decision aid tools (interpersonal group), distrust in the service, fatalistic beliefs, and perception of aging (cultural level), and lack of institutional policy, lack of care coordinators, inadequate infrastructure, absence of insurance coverage, and costs (and organizational status). Conclusions: This study identified critical barriers, facilitators, and implications to lung cancer screening participation. Therefore, we employed strategies for a new digital medicine (artificial intelligence) screening method to balance the cost-benefit, "workdays" lost in case of disease, and family hardship, which is essential to improve lung cancer screening uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teferi Gebru Gebremeskel
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute (FHMRI), College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, P.O. Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; (B.B.)
- Department of Reproductive Health, College of Health Sciences, Aksum University, Aksum P.O. Box 1010, Tigray, Ethiopia
| | - Frank Romeo
- S.H.R.O SBARRO Organization, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, RM 00196 Roma, Italy
- Department of Public Health, Health Institute, Wollega University, Nekemte P.O. Box 395, Wollega, Ethiopia;
| | - Adisu Tafari Shama
- Department of Public Health, Health Institute, Wollega University, Nekemte P.O. Box 395, Wollega, Ethiopia;
| | - Billie Bonevski
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute (FHMRI), College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, P.O. Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; (B.B.)
| | - Joshua Trigg
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute (FHMRI), College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, P.O. Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; (B.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lei F, Chen WT, Brecht ML, Zhang ZF, Hu Y, Xu T, Wang S, Lee E. Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Lung Cancer Screening Health Belief Scale in Chinese Americans: A Methodological Study. J Nurs Meas 2023; 31:489-501. [PMID: 37871962 DOI: 10.1891/jnm-2021-0093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
Background and Purpose: The purpose of this study is to report the process of adapting the existing Lung Cancer Screening Health Belief Scale to be used in Chinese Americans. Methods: Guided by Flaherty et al.'s cross-cultural equivalency model, the methodology used in the adaptation process consists of four steps, including preliminary modification after a comprehensive literature review, forward and backward translation, expert review, and cognitive interviews among participants. Results: The modified culturally fitted Lung Cancer Screening Health Belief Scale included 57 items and 6 subscales, which proved highly reliable and valid through the expert review and participants' review. Conclusions: This study provided an example for a novice cross-cultural researcher to adapt an instrument to be used in another population with a different language. Further research is needed to work out a standard guideline for cross-cultural instrument adaptation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Lei
- University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, MN, USA
| | - Wei-Ti Chen
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Zuo-Feng Zhang
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yuhe Hu
- Charles B. Wang Health Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tuzhen Xu
- Texas Woman's University, Denton, TX, USA
| | - Siqian Wang
- Case Western Reverse University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Eunice Lee
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lin YA, Hong YT, Lin XJ, Lin JL, Xiao HM, Huang FF. Barriers and facilitators to uptake of lung cancer screening: A mixed methods systematic review. Lung Cancer 2022; 172:9-18. [PMID: 35963208 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Numerous factors contribute to the low adherence to lung cancer screening (LCS) programs. A theory-informed approach to identifying the obstacles and facilitators to LCS uptake is required. This study aimed to identify, assess, and synthesize the available literature at the individual and healthcare provider (HCP) levels based on a social-ecological model and identify gaps to improve practice and policy decision-making. Systematic searches were conducted in nine electronic databases from inception to December 31, 2020. We also searched Google Scholar and manually examined the reference lists of systematic reviews to include relevant articles. Primary studies were scored for quality assessment. Among 3938 potentially relevant articles, 36 studies, including 25 quantitative and 11 qualitative studies, were identified for inclusion in the review. Fifteen common factors were extracted from 34 studies, including nine barriers and six facilitators. The barriers included individual factors (n = 5), health system factors (n = 3), and social/environmental factors (n = 1). The facilitators included only individual factors (n = 6). However, two factors, age and screening harm, remain mixed. This systematic review identified and combined barriers and facilitators to LCS uptake at the individual and HCP levels. The interaction mechanisms among these factors should be further explored, which will allow the construction of tailored LCS recommendations or interventions for the Chinese context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-An Lin
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Yu Ting Hong
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Xiu Jing Lin
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Jia Ling Lin
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Hui Min Xiao
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Fei Fei Huang
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sedani AE, Davis OC, Clifton SC, Campbell JE, Chou AF. Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening: A Framework-Driven Systematic Review. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022; 114:1449-1467. [PMID: 35993616 PMCID: PMC9664175 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djac154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study is to undertake a comprehensive systematic review to describe multilevel factors (barriers and facilitators) that may influence the implementation of low-dose chest computed tomography for lung cancer screening in the United States. METHODS Systematic literature searches were performed using 6 online databases and citation indexes for peer-reviewed studies, for articles published from 2013 to 2021. Studies were classified into 3 perspectives, based on the study's unit of analysis: system, health-care provider, and patient. Barriers and facilitators identified for each study included in our final review were then coded and categorized using the Consolidate Framework for Implementation Research domains. RESULTS At the system level, the 2 most common constructs were external policy and incentives and executing the implementation process. At the provider level, the most common constructs were evidence strength and quality of the intervention characteristics, patient needs and resources, implementation climate, and an individual's knowledge and beliefs about the intervention. At the patient level, the most common constructs were patient needs and resources, individual's knowledge and beliefs about the intervention, and engaging in the implementation process. These constructs can act as facilitators or barriers to lung cancer screening implementation. CONCLUSIONS Applying the Consolidate Framework for Implementation Research domains and constructs to understand and specify factors facilitating uptake of lung cancer screening as well as cataloging the lessons learned from previous efforts helps inform the development and implementation processes of lung cancer screening programs in the community setting. REGISTRATION PROSPERO, CRD42021247677.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ami E Sedani
- Correspondence to: Ami E. Sedani, MPH, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Hudson College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 801 NE 13th Street, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA (e-mail: )
| | - Olivia C Davis
- College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Shari C Clifton
- Robert M. Bird Health Sciences Library, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Janis E Campbell
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Hudson College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Ann F Chou
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Leng J, Li R, Lui F, Gany F. Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Adapting a Community Health Worker Model to Facilitate Lung Cancer Screening for Chinese For-Hire Vehicle Drivers. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2022; 37:311-318. [PMID: 32583351 PMCID: PMC7759596 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-020-01813-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Chinese immigrant for-hire vehicle (FHV) drivers who smoke or smoked are at high risk for lung cancer due to the combined impact of tobacco use and air pollution exposure yet underutilize lung cancer screening (LCS). Community Health Worker (CHW) programs have been effective at improving cancer screening rates. This study describes a community needs assessment to inform the adaptation of an existing CHW intervention to facilitate LCS among Chinese FHV drivers. Interviews were conducted until saturation with 13 Chinese-serving health professionals to determine the community's needs, priorities, and preferences. Transcripts were qualitatively analyzed using Atlas.ti. Seven frequently occurring themes were identified: knowledge of guidelines/access to LCS, acceptability of CHW program, CHW role in screening process, qualities of an ideal CHW, barriers to LCS, challenges to implementing a CHW program, and adaptations to CHW program. The adapted CHW intervention should include culturally tailored health education to increase LCS knowledge for patients and providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Leng
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Immigrant Health and Cancer Disparities Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Ave., 2nd Floor, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
| | - Randall Li
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Florence Lui
- City College & The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Francesca Gany
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Immigrant Health and Cancer Disparities Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Ave., 2nd Floor, New York, NY, 10017, USA
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10017, USA
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, 10017, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang YX, Zou JY, Hu LF, Liu Q, Huang RL, Tang T, Yue QQ, Sun YX, Xiao Q, Zeng X, Zeng Y. What is the general Chinese public's awareness of and attitudes towards Helicobacter pylori screening and associated health behaviours? A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e057929. [PMID: 35078854 PMCID: PMC8796245 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the general population's awareness of and attitudes toward Helicobacter pylori (HP) screening and health behaviours. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING Hengyang, Hunan Province, China. PARTICIPANTS Using stratified cluster random sampling, a pretested structured questionnaire was used to interview members of the general population aged ≥18 years. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Knowledge of and attitudes toward HP screening and associated health behaviours, sociodemographic factors associated with HP knowledge, and screening behaviours. RESULTS This study featured 1042 participants. The average knowledge score was 11 (QL=4, QU=20, range 0-29). Approximately 68.9% of the participants said they had heard of HP, but 67.5% had never had an HP test. The most common reasons for not undergoing screening were 'no symptoms' (55.7%) and 'lack of knowledge regarding the benefits of the test' (21.1%). Independent factors related to knowledge included age, education level, occupation, HP infection, frequency of drinking unboiled water (p<0.05). Factors independently associated with screening behaviour included occupation, average monthly income, presence/absence of indigestion, stomach discomfort or pain, and/or stomach disease and knowledge score (p<0.05). Overall, 941 (90.3%) participants never used anti-HP toothpaste, and 442 (40.5%) never used serving spoons or chopsticks. The risk factors for HP infection included eating out and eating in groups (p<0.05). CONCLUSION In China, the general population has poor knowledge of HP, but most people have a positive attitude towards HP screening. Being asymptomatic and lacking knowledge about testing were the main reasons for reluctance to be screened. These results highlight the urgent need for educational activities to raise awareness, enhance screening rates for HP, and encourage people to adopt a healthy lifestyle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying-Xin Wang
- Hengyang Medical School, School of Nursing, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China
| | - Jin-Yu Zou
- Hengyang Medical School, School of Nursing, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China
| | - Li-Feng Hu
- Hengyang Medical School, School of Nursing, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China
| | - Qi Liu
- Hengyang Medical School, School of Nursing, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China
- School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Ruo-Lin Huang
- Hengyang Medical School, School of Nursing, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China
| | - Tian Tang
- Hengyang Medical School, School of Nursing, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China
| | - Qian-Qian Yue
- Hengyang Medical School, School of Nursing, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China
| | - Ying-Xue Sun
- Hengyang Medical School, School of Nursing, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China
| | - Qiao Xiao
- Hengyang Medical School, School of Nursing, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China
| | - Xi Zeng
- Hengyang Medical School, Hunan Province Key Laboratory of Tumor Cellular & Molecular Pathology, Cancer Research Institute, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China
- Hengyang Medical School, Hunan Province Cooperative Innovation Center for Molecular Target New Drug Study, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China
| | - Ying Zeng
- Hengyang Medical School, School of Nursing, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China
- Hengyang Medical School, Hunan Province Key Laboratory of Tumor Cellular & Molecular Pathology, Cancer Research Institute, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Van Hal G, Diab Garcia P. Lung cancer screening: targeting the hard to reach-a review. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2021; 10:2309-2322. [PMID: 34164279 PMCID: PMC8182716 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-20-525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer death in the USA for both men and women, and also worldwide, it is the commonest cause of cancer death. The five-year survival rate for LC depends on the stage at which it is diagnosed. It is over 50% for cases detected in a localized stage but when the disease has spread to other organs, the five-year survival rate is only 5%. Unfortunately, only 16% of LC cases are diagnosed at an early stage. In 2013, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended annual LC screening with low dose chest computed tomography (CT) in adults aged 55 to 80 years who have a 30 pack-year smoking history and currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years, based on the evidence from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) in the USA. When it comes to recruiting the target group for lung cancer screening (LCS), there are several barriers to overcome, such as whom exactly to include, where to find the target group, how to convince the target to participate or how to attract participants from all socioeconomic groups. The aim of this review is to find out what is already known about how the target group for LCS can be contacted and how participation can be improved, since uptake is a key issue in every (cancer) screening program. A review of the literature was conducted using ‘lung cancer screening and participation and uptake’ as search string. We searched in Web of Science and PubMed for reviews, systematic reviews and articles, published between 2015 and 2020. Compared to the target groups for screening in the long-running cancer screening programs of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer, there are several additional obstacles regarding defining, locating and recruiting of the target group for LCS. Shared decision-making is crucial when we want to reach the hard to reach for LCS and it should be improved, by educating primary care practitioners about LCS guidelines and providing them with the necessary tools, such as decision aids, to facilitate their job in this respect. Moreover, the information materials should be more tailored to specific groups who participate least.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Van Hal
- Department of Social Epidemiology and Health Policy, University of Antwerp, Belgium, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Paloma Diab Garcia
- Department of Social Epidemiology and Health Policy, University of Antwerp, Belgium, Antwerpen, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Percac-Lima S, Ashburner JM, Atlas SJ, Rigotti NA, Flores EJ, Kuchukhidze S, Park ER. Barriers to and Interest in Lung Cancer Screening Among Latino and Non-Latino Current and Former Smokers. J Immigr Minor Health 2020; 21:1313-1324. [PMID: 30701427 DOI: 10.1007/s10903-019-00860-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer death in Latinos. In a telephone survey, we assessed perceptions about lung cancer and awareness of, interest in, and barriers to lung screening among older current and former smokers. We compared Latino and non-Latino responses adjusting for age, sex, education, and smoking status using logistic regression models. Of the 460 patients who completed the survey (51.5% response rate), 58.0% were women, 49.3% former smokers, 15.7% Latino, with mean age 63.6 years. More Latinos believed that lung cancer could be prevented compared to non-Latinos (74.6% vs. 48.2%, OR 3.07, CI 1.89-5.01), and less worried about developing lung cancer (34.8% vs. 50.3%, OR 0.44, CI 0.27-0.72). Most participants were not aware of lung screening (44.1% Latinos vs. 34.3% Non-Latinos, OR 1.24, CI 0.79-1.94), but when informed, more Latinos wanted to be screened (90.7% vs. 67%, OR 4.58, CI 2.31-9.05). Latinos reported fewer barriers to lung screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanja Percac-Lima
- Division of General Internal Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital, 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 1647, 02114, Boston, MA, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Mongan Institute for Health Policy Center Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Jeffrey M Ashburner
- Division of General Internal Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital, 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 1647, 02114, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Steven J Atlas
- Division of General Internal Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital, 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 1647, 02114, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Mongan Institute for Health Policy Center Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nancy A Rigotti
- Division of General Internal Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital, 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 1647, 02114, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Mongan Institute for Health Policy Center Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Efren J Flores
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Elyse R Park
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Mongan Institute for Health Policy Center Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
|