Perceived Vulnerability to Disease, Knowledge and Preventive Behavior Related to COVID-19 in Farsi and Arabic Speaking Refugees

Antecedents and Consequences of Health Literacy among Refugees and Migrants during the First Two Years of COVID-19: A Scoping Review

Supporting refugee and migrant health has become a critical focus of healthcare policy. Developing and designing health literacy interventions that meet the needs of refugees and migrants is core to achieving this objective. This literature review sought to identify antecedents and consequences of health literacy among refugees and migrants during the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic. We systematically searched nine electronic databases and numerous grey literature sources to identify studies published between December 2019 and March 2022. The antecedents (societal and environmental determinants, situational determinants, and personal determinants) and consequences of health literacy among refugees and migrants were mapped to a validated integrated health literacy model. Social and environmental determinants (n = 35) were the most reported antecedent influencing health literacy among refugees and migrants during the first two years of COVID-19. Language (n = 26) and culture (n = 16) were these determinants' most frequently reported aspects. Situational determinants (n = 24) and personal determinants (n = 26) were less frequently identified factors influencing health literacy among refugees and migrants. Literacy (n = 11) and socioeconomic status (n = 8) were the most frequently reported aspects of personal determinants. Media use (n = 9) and family and peer influence (n = 7) were the most cited situational determinants reported. Refugees and migrants with higher levels of health literacy were more likely to use healthcare services, resulting in better health outcomes. The findings of this review reveal personal and situational factors that impacted health literacy among refugees and migrants during COVID-19 that require attention. However, the inadequate adaptation of health literacy interventions for linguistic and cultural diversity was a greater problem. Attention to this well-known aspect of public health preparedness and tailoring health literacy interventions to the needs of refugees and migrants during pandemics and other public health emergencies are paramount.

Exploring refugees' health care access in times of COVID-19: a quantitative study in the Lisbon region, Portugal

Background

To address the health needs of refugees, health services must be culturally competent and facilitate this population's access to health care, especially in a context prone to the amplification of social inequities, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. However, few quantitative studies exist in the European Union, and to the extent of our knowledge, there are no published quantitative studies exploring refugees' access to health care during the pandemic in Portugal. The objective of this study is to describe the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of refugees living in Lisbon and to explore their healthcare access patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional, descriptive, and quantitative study from May to November 2022. Using Levesque' s theory on health care access, we designed and applied a 38-item questionnaire through face-to-face interviews with refugees living in Lisbon for at least 12 months, and used descriptive statistics to characterize sociodemographic and healthcare access profiles during the pandemic.

Results

The mean age of the 36 recruited refugees was 35 years (SD = 10.24), the majority were male (56%), married (72%), had at least a secondary education (69%), were unemployed (77.8%), and had a median length of stay in Portugal of 17 months (IQR = 45). All were registered in a primary care center, and 94% used healthcare services during the pandemic. The majority never tested positive for the coronavirus (58%) and one out of the positive was admitted to hospital due to severe COVID-19. A total of 97% received COVID-19 vaccination, of which 69% had an incomplete schedule. A quarter of the participants did not have access to information about COVID-19 in a language they understood, and although 97% needed health care during the pandemic, more than half (63%) did not seek it because of structural and cultural barriers. Half of the respondents had difficulty getting medical advice by phone or email, and 39.4% could not afford a medical examination or treatment. Only 18.2% sought counseling services. A total of 58.8% of the participants felt like healthcare professionals did not always show respect towards their culture, and 64.7% reported that healthcare professionals did not always discuss treatment options with them.

Conclusion

This study's findings highlight the need to endow inclusive communication, cultural competency, and patient involvement in health care, alongside improving the socioeconomic condition of refugees. Identified population characteristics and barriers to health care access by refugees in this study may inform future research on the health care needs of refugees in Portugal and ultimately assist in the devising of strategies to reduce inequalities in health care access.

A Mobile-Based Preventive Program for Young, Arabic-Speaking Asylum Seekers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany: Design, Feasibility, and Implementation

BACKGROUND

A majority of individuals seeking asylum in Germany are living in collective housings and thus exposed to a higher risk of contagion during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE

To test feasibility and efficacy of a culture-sensitive approach combining mobile app-based interventions and a face-to-face group intervention to improve knowledge about COVID-19 and promote vaccination readiness among collectively accommodated Arabic-speaking adolescents and young adults.

METHODS

We developed a mobile app that was composed of short video clips to explain the biological basis of COVID-19, demonstrate behavior to prevent transmission, and combat misconceptions and myths about vaccination. Explanations were given in a YouTube-like interview setting by a native Arabic-speaking physician. Elements of gamification (quizzes, rewards for solving test items) were also used. Consecutive videos and quizzes were presented over an intervention period of six weeks, the group intervention was scheduled as an add-on for half of participants in week 6. The manual of the group intervention was designed to provide actual behavior planning on the basis of the health action process approach. Sociodemographic information, mental health status, and knowledge about Covid-19 and available vaccines were assessed with questionnaire-based interviews at baseline and after six weeks. Interpreters assisted with the interviews in all cases.

RESULTS

Enrollment in the study proved to be very challenging as among other things, the housing facilities allowed contact with potentially eligible participants only during certain periods because of the pandemic situation. Also due to tightened contact restrictions, the face-to-face group interventions could not be held as planned. A total of 88 participants from 8 collective housing institutions were included in the study. 61 participants completed the full intake interview. Most participants had already been vaccinated at study enrollment (76.5%). They also yet claimed to comply with preventive measures to a very high extent (e.g., "always wearing masks" was indicated by 66% of participants), but practicing behavior that was not considered as effective against Covid-19 transmission was also frequently reported as a preventive measure (e.g., mouth rinsing). On the other hand, factual disease knowledge for COVID-19 was limited. Preoccupation with the information materials presented in the app steeply declined after study enrollment (e.g., 19% of participants watched the videos scheduled for week 3). Only 18 participants could be reached for the follow-up interview. Their COVID-19 disease knowledge did not shown to have increased after the intervention period (p=0.558).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that vaccine uptake was high and seemed to be depending on organizational determinants for the target group. The current mobile app-based intervention demonstrated low feasibility, which might have been related to various obstacles faced during the delivery: Learning from mobile phone content based on short videos requires a basic understanding of biological and IT-aspects as well as sufficient literacy and a living situation enabling the practical application of the learned behavioral prevention strategies. Therefore, in case of future pandemics, transmission prevention in the specific target group should rely more on structural aspects instead on sophisticated psychological interventions.

CLINICALTRIAL

https://www.drks.de, identifier: DRKS00028825.

Asylum Seekers' Responses to Government COVID-19 Recommendations: A Cross-sectional Survey in a Swiss Canton

Asylum seekers face multiple language, cultural and administrative barriers that could result in the inappropriate implementation of COVID-19 measures. This study aimed to explore their knowledge and attitudes to recommendations about COVID-19. We conducted a cross-sectional survey among asylum seekers living in the canton of Vaud, Switzerland. We used logistic regressions to analyze associations between knowledge about health recommendations, the experience of the pandemic and belief to rumors, and participant sociodemographic characteristics. In total, 242 people participated in the survey, with 63% of men (n = 150) and a median age of 30 years old (IQR 23-40). Low knowledge was associated with linguistic barriers (aOR 0.36, 95% CI 0.14-0.94, p = 0.028) and living in a community center (aOR 0.43, 95% CI 0.22-0.85, p = 0.014). Rejected asylum seekers were more likely to believe COVID-19 rumors (aOR 2.81, 95% CI 1.24-6.36, p = 0.013). This survey underlines the importance of tailoring health recommendations and interventions to reach asylum seekers, particularly those living in community centers or facing language barriers.