1
|
Schindl M, Zipko H, Bethge M. Reproducibility of improvements in patient-reported functional ability following functional capacity evaluation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:258. [PMID: 35296299 PMCID: PMC8928652 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05208-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Performance of functional capacity evaluation (FCE) may affect patients, self-efficacy to complete physical activity tasks. First evidence from a diagnostic before-after study indicates a significant increase of patient-reported functional ability. Our study set out to test the reproducibility of these results. Methods Patients with musculoskeletal trauma and an unclear return to work prognosis were recruited in a trauma rehabilitation center in Lower Austria. We included patient cohorts of three consecutive years (2016: n = 161, 2017: n = 140; 2018: n = 151). Our primary outcome was patient-reported functional ability, measured using the Spinal Function Sort (SFS). SFS scores were assessed before and after performing an FCE to describe the change in patient-reported functional ability (cohort study). We investigated whether the change in SFS scores observed after performing an FCE in our first cohort could be replicated in subsequent cohorts. Results Demographic data (gender, age and time after trauma) did not differ significantly between the three patient cohorts. Correlation analysis showed highly associated before and after SFS scores in each cohort (2016: rs = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.79 to 0.89; 2017: rs = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.91; 2018: rs = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.82 to 0.91). Improvements in SFS scores were consistent across the cohorts, with overlapping 95% confidence intervals (2016: 14.8, 95% CI: 11.3 to 18.2; 2017: 14.8, 95% CI: 11.5 to 18.0; 2018: 15.2, 95% CI: 12.0 to 18.4). Similarity in SFS scores and SFS differences were also supported by non-significant Kruskal–Wallis H tests (before FCE: p = 0.517; after FCE: p = 0.531; SFS differences: p = 0.931). Conclusions A significant increase in patient-reported functional ability after FCE was found in the original study and the results could be reproduced in two subsequent cohorts. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05208-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Schindl
- Rehab Center Weißer Hof, AUVA, Holzgasse 350, Klosterneuburg , A-3400, Austria.
| | - Harald Zipko
- FH Campus Wien, Favoritenstrasse 226, Wien, 1100, Austria
| | - Matthias Bethge
- Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Lübeck, 23562, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Durand MJ, Coutu MF, Berbiche D. Validation of the Work Disability Diagnosis Interview for Musculoskeletal and Mental Disorders. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2021; 31:232-242. [PMID: 32712758 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-020-09916-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Purpose The Work Disability Diagnosis Interview (WoDDI) consists of a semi-structured interview designed to help clinicians systematically identify the factors contributing to a work disability. The aim was to validate two versions of the WoDDI (construct validity, internal consistency, interrater reliability) developed for individuals absent from work due to a musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) or common mental disorder (CMD). Methods A convenience sample of workers absent from work for at least three months due to an MSD or a CMD and enrolled in a rehabilitation program was recruited. To assess interrater reliability for the MSD and CMD versions, six occupational therapists by sub-group scored the WoDDI based on case histories. Results A total of 290 male and female workers (140 MSD, 150 CMD) were recruited. Exploratory factor analysis revealed similar dimensions in both versions, specifically, illness representation, clinical judgment of the complexity of the medical condition, and high level of work demands. It allowed items to be reduced by approximately 20 and 40% respectively for the CMD and MSD versions. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) varied from 0.40 to 0.75 and 0.75 to 0.80 for the CMD and MSD versions respectively, while interrater reliability (Cohen's kappa coefficients) varied from 0.51 to 0.57 and 0.27 to 0.44 for the two versions respectively. Conclusion Despite some limitations, the WoDDI's factors correspond to those in the current scientific literature. The varying results for internal consistency suggest limitations mainly for the CMD version. Interrater reliability was found overall to be fair. The next step will be to revise and retest this version.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-José Durand
- Centre d'action en prévention et réadaptation de l'incapacité au travail (CAPRIT), Université de Sherbrooke, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Suite 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada.
- Centre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne-Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean sur les innovations en santé (CR-CSIS), Université de Sherbrooke, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Suite 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada.
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Suite 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada.
| | - Marie-France Coutu
- Centre d'action en prévention et réadaptation de l'incapacité au travail (CAPRIT), Université de Sherbrooke, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Suite 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada
- Centre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne-Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean sur les innovations en santé (CR-CSIS), Université de Sherbrooke, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Suite 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Suite 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada
| | - Djamal Berbiche
- Centre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne-Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean sur les innovations en santé (CR-CSIS), Université de Sherbrooke, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Suite 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Edelaar MJA, Oesch PR, Gross DP, James CL, Reneman MF. Functional Capacity Evaluation Research: Report from the Fourth International Functional Capacity Evaluation Research Meeting. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2020; 30:475-479. [PMID: 32034571 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-020-09876-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To summarize progress of functional capacity evaluation (FCE) research based on the proceedings of the Fourth International FCE Research Conference held in Switzerland on September 21 and 22, 2018. Methods A scientific committee identified key issues in FCE research and developed the program including key note presentations, a call for abstracts, and round table discussions over 2 days. Highlights of the presentations and discussions are summarized in this article. Results Seventy-nine participants from 11 countries attended the conference where 10 keynote lectures and 21 abstracts were presented. There was also an open discussion regarding the need for an International FCE clinical practice guideline (CPG), methods for developing such a guideline, and practical next steps. Full program details and abstracts from this Fourth International FCE Research Conference are available from https://www.sar-reha.ch/interessengemeinschaften/ig-ergonomie.html . Conclusions Researchers and clinicians continue to increase the body of knowledge in the FCE field. A major finding of this conference is the diversity across the different FCE protocols and research groups as well as of the different uses of FCE across cultural and social economic systems. Next steps will include exploring the development of an international, interdisciplinary, evidence-based FCE clinical practice guideline by a committee formed at the conference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J A Edelaar
- Rehabilitation Center Heliomare, Wijk aan zee, The Netherlands.
| | - P R Oesch
- Work Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Centre Valens, Valens, Switzerland
| | - D P Gross
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - C L James
- School of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
| | - M F Reneman
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schindl M, Wassipaul S, Wagner T, Gstaltner K, Bethge M. Impact of Functional Capacity Evaluation on Patient-Reported Functional Ability: An Exploratory Diagnostic Before-After Study. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2019; 29:711-717. [PMID: 30796579 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-019-09829-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Work capacity in patients with orthopedic trauma and long-lasting inactivity is significantly reduced. Functional capacity evaluation (FCE) is a diagnostic approach for developing recommendations for a return to work and further occupational rehabilitation when the ability to carry out previous job demands is uncertain. However, FCE may also have direct effects on the patients' appraisal of their functional ability. Our study therefore evaluated the change in patient-reported functional ability after the performance of an FCE. Methods We performed a diagnostic before-after study in 161 consecutively recruited patients with trauma who were referred for FCE at the end of an interdisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation program in Austria. Patients completed the Spinal Function Sort to assess patient-reported functional ability both prior to the FCE and after completing it. Results Patient-reported functional ability (0-200 points) improved by 14.8 points (95% CI 11.3-18.2). The number of participants who rated their functional ability below their functional capacity as observed by the FCE decreased from 82.6 to 64.6% by about 18 percentage points. Conclusions The performance of the FCE in patients with trauma was associated with an improvement of patient-reported functional ability. The performance of an FCE in trauma rehabilitation may possibly have a direct therapeutic effect on the patient by allowing a more realistic appraisal of the ability to perform relevant work activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Schindl
- Rehabilitationszentrum Weißer Hof, AUVA, Holzgasse 350, 3400, Klosterneuburg, Austria.
| | - Sylvia Wassipaul
- Rehabilitationszentrum Weißer Hof, AUVA, Holzgasse 350, 3400, Klosterneuburg, Austria
| | - Tanja Wagner
- Abteilung Statistik, Hauptstelle AUVA, A. Stifter-Straße 65, 1200, Wien, Austria
| | - Karin Gstaltner
- Rehabilitationszentrum Weißer Hof, AUVA, Holzgasse 350, 3400, Klosterneuburg, Austria
| | - Matthias Bethge
- Institut für Sozialmedizin und Epidemiologie, Universität zu Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bieleman HJ, Stewart R, Reneman MF, van Ittersum WM, van der Schans CP, Drossaers-Bakker KW, Oosterveld FGJ. Trajectories of Physical Work Capacity in Early Symptomatic Osteoarthritis of Hip and Knee: Results from the Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee (CHECK) Study. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2019; 29:483-492. [PMID: 30151630 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-018-9809-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the 5-year course of physical work capacity of participants with early symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip and/or the knee; to identify trajectories and explore the relationship between trajectories and covariates. Methods In a prospective cohort study, physical work capacity was measured at baseline, using a test protocol (functional capacity evaluation) consisting of work-related physical activities. Participants were invited to participate in 1, 2 and 5 year follow-up measurements. Multilevel analysis and latent classes analysis were performed, in models with test performances as dependent variables and age, sex, work status, self-reported function (Western Ontario McMasters Arthritis Scale-WOMAC), body mass index (BMI) and time as independent variables. Multiple imputation was used to control for the influence of missing data. Results At baseline and after 1, 2 and 5 years there were 96, 64, 61 and 35 participants. Mean (SD) age at baseline was 56 (4.9) years, 84% were females. There was no statistically significant change in test performances (lifting low and high, carrying, static overhead work, repetitive bending, repetitive rotations) between the 4 measurements. Male sex, younger age and better self-reported function were statistically significant (p < 0.05) determinants of higher performance on most of the tests; having a paid job, BMI and progression of time were not. Three trajectories were identified: 'weak giving way', 'stable and able', and 'strong with decline'. Discussion In subgroups of participants with early symptomatic OA, determined by age, sex and self-reported function, physical work capacity seems to be a stable characteristic over 5 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H J Bieleman
- Saxion Universities of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 70.000, 7500 KB, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| | - R Stewart
- University Medical Centre, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - M F Reneman
- University Medical Centre, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - W M van Ittersum
- Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - F G J Oosterveld
- Saxion Universities of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 70.000, 7500 KB, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fong J, Ocampo R, Gros DP, Tavakoli M. A Robot with an Augmented-Reality Display for Functional Capacity Evaluation and Rehabilitation of Injured Workers. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2019; 2019:181-186. [PMID: 31374627 DOI: 10.1109/icorr.2019.8779417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Occupational rehabilitation is an integral part of the recovery process for workers who have sustained injuries at the workplace. It often requires the injured worker to engage in functional tasks that simulate the workplace environment to help regain their functional capabilities and allow for a return to employment. We present a system comprised of a robotic arm for recreating the physical dynamics of functional tasks and a 3D Augmented Reality (AR) display for immersive visualization of the tasks. While this system can be used to simulate a multitude of occupational tasks, we focus on one specific functional task. Participants perform a virtual version of the task using the robot-AR system, and a physical version of the same task without the system. This study shows the results for two able-bodied users to determine if the robot-AR system produces upper-limb movements similar to the real-life equivalent task. The similarity between relative joint positions, i.e., hand-to-elbow (H2E) and elbow-to-shoulder (E2S) displacements, is evaluated within clusters based on the spatial position of the user's hand. The H2E displacements for approximately 50% of hand position clusters were consistent between the robot-AR and real-world conditions and approximately 30% for E2S displacements. The similar clusters are distributed across the entire task space however, indicating the robot-AR system has the potential to properly simulate real-world equivalent tasks.
Collapse
|
7
|
James C, MacKenzie L, Capra M. Content validity of the WorkHab functional capacity evaluation. Aust Occup Ther J 2019; 66:380-392. [DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Carole James
- School of Health Sciences University of Newcastle CallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Lynette MacKenzie
- Faculty of Health Sciences University of Sydney Lidcombe New South Wales Australia
| | - Mike Capra
- School of Geography, Planning and Environment Queensland University Brisbane Queensland Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Edelaar MJA, Gross DP, James CL, Reneman MF. Functional Capacity Evaluation Research: Report from the Third International Functional Capacity Evaluation Research Meeting. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2018; 28:130-134. [PMID: 28389973 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-017-9707-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Based on the success of the first two conferences the Third International FCE Research Conference was held in The Netherlands on September 29, 2016. The aim was to provide ongoing opportunity to share and recent FCE research and discuss its implications. Methods Invitations and call for abstracts were sent to previous attendees, researchers, practicing FCE clinicians and professionals. Fifteen abstracts were selected for presentation. The FCE research conference contained two keynote lectures. Results 54 participants from 12 countries attended the conference where 15 research projects and 2 keynote lectures were presented. The conference provided an opportunity to present and discuss recent FCE research, and provided a forum for discourse related to FCE use. Conference presentations covered aspects of practical issues in administration and interpretation; protocol reliability and validity; consideration of specific injury populations; and a focused discussion on proposed inclusion of work physiology principles in FCE testing with the Heart Rate Reserve Method. Details of this Third International FCE Research Conference are available from http://repro.rcnheliomare.nl/FCE.pdf . Conclusions Researchers, clinicians, and other professionals in the FCE area have a common desire to further improve the content and quality of FCE research and to collaborate to further develop research across systems, cultures and countries. A fourth, 2-day, International FCE research conference will be held in Valens, Switzerland in August or September 2018. A 'FCE research Society' will be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J A Edelaar
- Rehabilitation Center Heliomare, Wijk aan zee, The Netherlands.
| | - D P Gross
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - C L James
- School of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
| | - M F Reneman
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sinden KE, McGillivary TL, Chapman E, Fischer SL. Survey of kinesiologists' functional capacity evaluation practice in Canada. Work 2017; 56:571-580. [PMID: 28339418 DOI: 10.3233/wor-172519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Canada, functional capacity evaluations (FCEs) are commonly administered by several health care professions including kinesiologists. Kinesiologists have been recently regulated as health care professionals in Ontario and we know little about their demographics, the frequency of FCE administration, or the types of FCEs used by this group. OBJECTIVE The purposes of this study were to identify: 1) the demographic characteristics and FCE education of kinesiology FCE practitioners; 2) the FCE systems most used by these practitioners and 3) the constructs from assessments used to determine functional capacity. METHODS A survey was distributed to members of the Canadian Kinesiology Alliance. Descriptive statistics and frequency distributions were calculated from the survey responses (n = 77). RESULTS FCE practitioners were represented by kinesiologists (79%) practicing more than 15 years and 1-5 years, who received FCE training from a certification course. ARCON (23%) was the most common FCE system used. Low-level lifting (43%), mid-lift (38%), pulling (38%) and walking (38%) are the most common FCE task components used to assess functional capacity. Although kinesiologists consider multiple factors when making decisions about task component endpoints, biomechanical observations/body mechanics are the primary methods used. CONCLUSIONS Kinesiologists are conducting FCEs for the primary purpose of preparing return-to-work or workplace accommodation recommendations. Although functional capacity is determined using multiple factors, there is an emphasis on biomechanics and body mechanics. Focusing FCE training and research on these constructs may provide opportunities to further strengthen the reliability and validity of FCE outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn E Sinden
- School of Kinesiology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Steven L Fischer
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.,School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|