Unravelling the Complexities of Workplace Disclosure Among Persons with Non-Visible Disabilities and Illnesses: A Qualitative Meta-Ethnography

Exploring the employment experiences of young adults with multiple minoritized identities: A qualitative study focusing on race and non-apparent disabilities

Youth with disabilities often encounter many challenges in securing employment. Although the common barriers that youth face are well documented, little is known about the experiences of youth who have multiple minoritized identities in finding and maintaining employment. Youth with disabilities who belong to racial minoritized groups may encounter ableism and racism and other forms of discrimination at work. Exploring the experiences of racial minoritized youth with non-apparent disabilities is important given the growing concern about social inequities that are linked to disadvantage and differential access to resources such as employment. We used a qualitative design involving semi-structured interviews with 19 youth (13 women, 3 non-binary, 3 men), aged 17-30 (mean 23.5 years). An inductive thematic analysis was applied to analyze the data. We identified the following themes: (1) challenges finding and maintaining employment; (2) the extent of safety and comfort with disclosing minoritized identities in the workplace (i.e., comfortable disclosing; uncomfortable disclosing; did not need to disclose and/or hiding identities); (3) workplace discrimination based on minoritized identities (i.e., ableism, racism, ableist racism, gendered ableism, racist and gendered ableism); (4) impact of discrimination (i.e., negative affective outcomes, social and work adjustment, impact on professional development) and coping strategies (i.e., advocacy, networking, peer support); and (5) advice for youth and employers. Our study highlights the extent of racism and ableism that racial minoritized youth with non-apparent disabilities experience in the workplace and the importance of rehabilitation clinicians supporting their inclusion.

Individual and relational factors related to disclosure of epilepsy in the workplace

BACKGROUND

The decision to disclose epilepsy in the workplace is complex, as it entails both advantages and disadvantages. In this study, we aimed to identify the factors associated with disclosure of epilepsy in the workplace based on the disclosure decision-making model for patients who required underwent comprehensive assessment in the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 193 patients with epilepsy (112 men, aged 18-66 years) who underwent comprehensive assessment, including long-term video-EEG monitoring, neuroimaging studies, and neuropsychological and psychosocial assessment in the Tohoku University Hospital EMU. Data were obtained from the medical records and self-reported questionnaires at our EMU. The outcome variable was disclosure of epilepsy. Predictive variables were selected based on the disclosure decision-making model: individual factors (i.e., age, sex, age at onset of epilepsy, seizure frequency, generalized tonic-clonic seizures or focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures in the last 2 years, experiences of viewing own seizure, and felt stigma), and relational factors (i.e., experiences of discrimination, enacted stigma, and social support). Data were analyzed using a logistic regression analysis model.

RESULTS

Our results indicated that 43.5% of patients disclosed epilepsy to their employer. The factors that associated with disclosure of epilepsy were experiences of discrimination (odds ratio [OR], 7.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.84-21.34, p < 0.01), experiences of viewing own seizure (OR, 3.51; 95% CI, 1.27-9.72, p < 0.05), and level of enacted stigma (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.48-0.99, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study indicated that the decision to disclose epilepsy was associated with both individual factors, such as experience of viewing own seizures, and relational factors, such as experience of discrimination and enacted stigma.

"I Wish This Tool Was Available to Me Sooner": Piloting a Workplace Autism Disclosure Decision-Aid Tool for Autistic Youth and Young Adults

Background

For autistic youth and young adults, deciding whether to disclose their autism at work may be complex since they are newly entering the workforce and are at an impressionable developmental period. Decision-aid tools can help someone make a choice regarding a topic/situation. We developed a workplace autism disclosure decision-aid tool called DISCLOSURE (Do I Start the Conversation and Let On, Speak Up, and REveal?) to support autistic youth and young adults navigate disclosure decision-making. In this study, we aimed to assess the DISCLOSURE tool's (1) impact on decision-making and self-determination capabilities and (2) usability, feasibility, and acceptability.

Methods

This was a single-arm pre-post pilot study. The DISCLOSURE tool comprises three interactive PDF documents and videos. Thirty participants (mean age of 23.5 years) completed online surveys before and after interacting with the DISCLOSURE tool. We used descriptive statistics for usability, feasibility, and acceptability. We calculated the Wilcoxon signed rank and paired t-tests to determine pre-post changes in decision-making and self-determination capabilities (Decisional Conflict Scale-Low Literacy Version [DCS-LL]; adapted Arc's Self-Determination Scale). We analyzed open-ended data using conventional (inductive) content analysis.

Results

There were significant decreases in DCS-LL total and subscale scores (p < 0.0001) and a significant increase in Arc's total score (p = 0.01), suggesting important improvements. There were no significant increases for Arc's psychological empowerment and self-realization subscales (p = 0.05; p = 0.09). Median scores (4.0/5.0) indicate that participants agreed that the DISCLOSURE tool is acceptable, feasible, and meets the usability criteria. We developed four categories to describe the open-ended data: (1) disclosure capabilities, (2) the role of others, (3) positive tool impact and feedback, and (4) minimal tool impact and constructive feedback.

Discussion

Findings are suggestive of the DISCLOSURE tool's ability to support workplace autism disclosure decision-making. Future studies should ascertain the DISCLOSURE tool's effectiveness, explore others' feedback (e.g., employers), and how to incorporate the tool into relevant employment and vocational programs.

Applying an intersectional ecological framework to understand ableism and racism in employment among youth and young adults with disabilities

PURPOSE

Youth with disabilities often face many barriers in finding employment. A knowledge gap exists surrounding the experiences of racially minoritized youth with disabilities who arguably encounter multiple and complex forms of discrimination. The purpose of this study was to understand the experiences of ableism and racism in employment among racially minoritized youth and young adults with non-apparent disabilities.

METHODS

Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 racially minoritized participants aged 17-30 with non-apparent disabilities. Data were analyzed using a deductive thematic analysis approach informed by an intersectional ecological framework.

RESULTS

Themes that affected racially minoritized youth's employment included: (1) microsystems (i.e., individual barriers and facilitators to employment); (2) mesosystems (i.e., peers, family, disability, race/ethnicity, and work); (3) exosystems (i.e., workplace policies, healthcare system, educational institutions, community organizations); (4) macrosystems (i.e., ableism, racism, gendered discrimination and intersectional forms of discrimination); (5) the chronosystem (i.e., timing of obtaining employment, diagnosis and discrimination); and (6) ecological niche, which involved the extent to which work environments were safe and inclusive.

CONCLUSION

Applying an intersectional ecological framework facilitates our understanding of ableism and racism in employment among youth and young adults with disabilities. Further attention is urgently needed to minimize discrimination and enhance supportive, inclusive and psychologically safe, work environments for minoritized youth with disabilities.

A Codeveloped Web-Based Disability Disclosure Toolkit for Youth With Disabilities: Mixed Methods Pilot Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Youth and young adults with disabilities experience many barriers in securing employment such as discrimination, inaccessible environments, and lack of support. Youth often need to decide whether and how they should disclose their need for accommodations to employers, which can help them to do their best at work. However, few evidence-based toolkits focusing on disability disclosure exist for youth with various types of disabilities. Supporting youth to develop self-advocacy skills is salient because they are an underrepresented and marginalized group in the labor market.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to conduct a pilot evaluation of a web-based toolkit to enhance disability disclosure for youth and young adults helping to advocate for their needs and request workplace accommodations.

METHODS

We conducted 2 in-person focus groups to codevelop a web-based disability disclosure toolkit, which was followed by a pilot evaluation with a pre-post survey. Primary outcomes focused on the relevance of the toolkit content, preliminary perceived impact on knowledge and confidence, and open-ended feedback on the usefulness of the toolkit. Secondary outcomes focused on effectiveness (ie, measures of self-determination).

RESULTS

A total of 14 youths with various types of disabilities took part in the study (aged 20-25 years; n=11, 78% female) including 3 who participated in the codevelopment focus group sessions and 11 youths who participated in the surveys. Our findings involved three main themes in the codevelopment sessions that included (1) disability disclosure and workplace accommodation experiences (ie, knowing when, whether, and how to disclose their disability and request workplace accommodations), (2) usefulness of the tool (ie, relatable content, format and design, and suggestions for further development), and (3) perceived impact of the toolkit (ie, navigating disclosure decisions and how to approach employers and develop other relevant employment skills). The survey findings showed that the majority of participants (10/11, 91%) reported that the toolkit increased or changed their knowledge or understanding of disability disclosure. Most participants (8/11, 73%) reported that the toolkit helped to increase their perceived confidence in their daily activities. The majority of participants (8/11, 73%) agreed or strongly agreed that the toolkit was easy to understand and comprehensive. Regarding the preliminary impact of the toolkit, participants did not demonstrate any significant improvements in self-determination (all P>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings emphasize the importance of codeveloping a disability disclosure toolkit with youth to enhance its relevance for their needs. Our toolkit indicates preliminary potential as an educational resource for youth and young adults with disabilities as they search for and secure employment. Further research is needed to assess the impact of the tool with larger samples to understand the impact of workplace disability disclosure decisions for youth with disabilities.

Ableism and Workplace Discrimination Among Youth and Young Adults with Disabilities: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Young people with disabilities are persistently under-employed and experience concerning rates of discrimination and ableism in looking for work and within the workplace. Focusing on youth is salient because rates of ableism are often higher among younger ages compared to older. The objective of this systematic review was to explore the experiences and impact of workplace discrimination and ableism among youth and young adults with disabilities.

METHODS

Systematic searches of seven databases from 2000 to 2021 were conducted. Four reviewers independently applied the inclusion criteria, extracted the data and rated the study quality.

RESULTS

Of the 39 studies meeting our inclusion criteria, they represented 516,281 participants across eight countries over a 20-year period. The findings highlight the rates of workplace ableism, factors affecting workplace ableism (i.e., type of disability, gender, education level, lack of employers' knowledge about disability), ableism in job searching and anticipated ableism. The review also noted the impact of workplace ableism, which included pay discrimination, lack of job supports and social exclusion, job turnover and unemployment, and discrimination allegations and charges.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings reveal the stark prevalence of workplace ableism among youth and young adults with disabilities. There is an urgent need for further in-depth research to understand youth's lived experiences of ableism and the development of solutions to address it so they can be included in a meaningful and respectful way in the workplace.

Employment and accommodation needs and the effect of COVID-19 on men and women with traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) impacts an individual's workforce involvement post-injury. Support services and workplace accommodations that can help with work re-integration post-TBI may differ based on a person's sex and gender. The added impact of COVID-19 remains under-explored.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the support services and workplace accommodation needs and the impact of COVID-19 on work and mental health for persons with TBI, considering sex and gender.

METHODS

A cross-sectional online survey was distributed. Descriptive and regression analyses were applied to uncover sex and gender differences, along with content analysis for open-ended responses.

RESULTS

Thirty-two persons with TBI (62% women, 38% men) participated. Physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and counselling services were indicated as the most needed services by women and men. Modified hours/days and modified/different duties were the most needed workplace accommodations. Mental challenges impacting well-being was a highlighted concern for both men and women. Women scored poorer on the daily activity domain of the Quality of Life after Brain Injury - Overall Scale (p = 0.02). Assistance with daily activities was highlighted by women for a successful transition to work, including housekeeping and caregiving. Men were more likely than women to experience change in employment status because of COVID-19 (p = 0.02). Further, a higher percentage of men expressed concern about the inability to pay for living accommodations, losing their job, and not having future job prospects.

CONCLUSION

Findings reveal important differences between men and women when transitioning to work post-TBI and emphasize the need for sex and gender considerations.