Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol in cancer patients undergoing major lung surgery

Personalized Medicine for Classical Anesthesia Drugs and Cancer Progression

In this review, we aim to discuss the use and effect of five different drugs used in the induction of anesthesia in cancer patients. Propofol, fentanyl, rocuronium, sugammadex, and dexamethasone are commonly used to induce anesthesia and prevent pain during surgery. Currently, the mechanisms of these drugs to induce the state of anesthesia are not yet fully understood, despite their use being considered safe. An association between anesthetic agents and cancer progression has been determined; therefore, it is essential to recognize the effects of all agents during cancer treatment and to evaluate whether the treatment provided to the patients could be more precise. We also highlight the use of in silico tools to review drug interaction effects and safety, as well as the efficacy of the treatment used according to different subgroups of patients.

Influence of Bayesian optimization on the performance of propofol target-controlled infusion

Background

Target controlled infusion (TCI) systems use population-based pharmacokinetic (PK) models that do not take into account inter-individual residual variation. This study compares the bias and inaccuracy of a population-based vs a personalized TCI propofol titration using Bayesian adaptation. Haemodynamic and hypnotic stability, and the prediction probability of alternative PK models, was studied.

Methods

A double-blinded, prospective randomized controlled trial of 120 subjects undergoing cardiac surgery was conducted. Blood samples were obtained at 10, 35, 50, 65, 75 and 120 min and analysed using a point-of-care propofol blood analyser. Bayesian adaptation of the PK model was applied at 60 min in the intervention group. Median (Absolute) Performance Error (Md(A)PE) was used to evaluate the difference between bias and inaccuracy of the models. Haemodynamic (mean arterial pressure [MAP], heart rate) and hypnotic (bispectral index [BIS]) stability was studied. The predictive performance of four alternative propofol PK models was studied.

Results

MdPE and MdAPE did not differ between groups during the pre-adjustment period (control group: 6.3% and 16%; intervention group: 5.4% and 18%). MdPE differed in the post-adjustment period (12% vs. -0.3%), but MdAPE did not (18% vs. 15%). No difference in heart rate, MAP or BIS was found. Compared with the other models, the Eleveld propofol PK model (patients) showed the best prediction performance.

Conclusions

When an accurate population-based PK model was used for propofol TCI, Bayesian adaption of the model improved bias but not precision.

Clinical trial registration

Dutch Trial Registry NTR4518.

Development of a highly sensitive gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method preceded by solid-phase microextraction for the analysis of propofol in low-volume cerebral microdialysate samples

To date, the commonly used intravenous anesthetic propofol has been widely studied, and fundamental pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characteristics of the drug are known. However, propofol has not yet been quantified in vivo in the target organ, the human brain. Here, cerebral microdialysis offers the unique opportunity to sample propofol in the living human organism. Therefore, a highly sensitive analytical method for propofol quantitation in small sample volumes of 30 μL, based on direct immersion solid‐phase microextraction was developed. Preconcentration was followed by gas chromatographic separation and mass spectrometric detection of the compound. This optimized method provided a linear range between the lower limit of detection (50 ng/L) and 200 μg/L. Matrix‐matched calibration was used to compensate recovery issues. A precision of 2.7% relative standard deviation between five consecutive measurements and an interday precision of 6.4% relative standard deviation could be achieved. Furthermore, the permeability of propofol through a cerebral microdialysate system was tested. In summary, the developed method to analyze cerebral microdialysate samples, allows the in vivo quantitation of propofol in the living human brain. Additionally the calculation of extracellular fluid levels is enabled since the recovery of the cerebral microdialysis regarding propofol was determined.

Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of propofol in adolescents undergoing scoliosis surgery with intraoperative wake-up test: a study using Bispectral index and composite auditory evoked potentials as pharmacodynamic endpoints

BACKGROUND

In adolescents limited data are available on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of propofol. In this study we derived a PK-PD model for propofol in adolescents undergoing idiopathic scoliosis surgery with an intraoperative wake-up test with reinduction of anesthesia using both Bispectral Index (BIS) and composite A-line ARX index (cAAI) as endpoints.

METHODS

Fourteen adolescents (9.8-20.1 years) were evaluated during standardized propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for idiopathic scoliosis surgery with an intraoperative wake-up test with reinduction of anesthesia. BIS and cAAI were continuously measured and blood samples collected. A propofol PKPD model was developed using NONMEM.

RESULTS

The time courses of propofol concentrations, BIS and cAAI values during anesthesia, intra-operative wakeup and reduction of anesthesia were best described by a two-compartment PK model linked to an inhibitory sigmoidal Emax PD model. For the sigmoidal Emax model, the propofol concentration at half maximum effect (EC₅₀) was 3.51 and 2.14 mg/L and Hill coefficient 1.43 and 6.85 for BIS and cAAI, respectively. The delay in PD effect in relation to plasma concentration was best described by a two compartment effect-site model with a ke_o of 0.102 min^- 1, ke₁₂ of 0.121 min^- 1 and ke₂₁ of 0.172 min^- 1.

CONCLUSIONS

A population PKPD model for propofol in adolescents was developed that successfully described the time course of propofol concentration, BIS and cAAI in individuals upon undergoing scoliosis surgery with intraoperative wake-up test and reinduction of anesthesia. Large differences were demonstrated between both monitors. This may imply that BIS and cAAI measure fundamentally different endpoints in the brain.

Utilization of data below the analytical limit of quantitation in pharmacokinetic analysis and modeling: promoting interdisciplinary debate

Traditionally, bioanalytical laboratories do not report actual concentrations for samples with results below the LOQ (BLQ) in pharmacokinetic studies. BLQ values are outside the method calibration range established during validation and no data are available to support the reliability of these values. However, ignoring BLQ data can contribute to bias and imprecision in model-based pharmacokinetic analyses. From this perspective, routine use of BLQ data would be advantageous. We would like to initiate an interdisciplinary debate on this important topic by summarizing the current concepts and use of BLQ data by regulators, pharmacometricians and bioanalysts. Through introducing the limit of detection and evaluating its variability, BLQ data could be released and utilized appropriately for pharmacokinetic research.

An Allometric Model of Remifentanil Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

BACKGROUND

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models are used to predict and explore drug infusion schemes and their resulting concentration profiles for clinical application. Our aim was to develop a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for remifentanil that is accurate in patients with a wide range of age and weight.

METHODS

Remifentanil pharmacokinetic data were obtained from three previously published studies of adults and children, one of which also contained pharmacodynamic data from adults. NONMEM was used to estimate allometrically scaled compartmental pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models. Weight, age, height, sex, and body mass index were explored as covariates. Predictive performance was measured across young children, children, young adults, middle-aged, and elderly.

RESULTS

Overall, 2,634 remifentanil arterial concentration and 3,989 spectral-edge frequency observations from 131 individuals (55 male, 76 female) were analyzed. Age range was 5 days to 85 yr, weight range was 2.5 to 106 kg, and height range was 49 to 193 cm. The final pharmacokinetic model uses age, weight, and sex as covariates. Parameter estimates for a 35-yr-old, 70-kg male (reference individual) are: V1, 5.81 l; V2, 8.82 l; V3, 5.03 l; CL, 2.58 l/min; Q2, 1.72 l/min; and Q3, 0.124 l/min. Parameters mostly increased with fat-free mass and decreased with age. The pharmacodynamic model effect compartment rate constant (ke0) was 1.09 per minute (reference individual), which decreased with age.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model to predict remifentanil concentration and effect for a wide range of patient ages and weights. Performance exceeded the Minto model over a wide age and weight range.

Characterizing the time-course of antihypertensive activity and optimal dose range of fimasartan via mechanism-based population modeling

Fimasartan is a novel angiotensin II receptor blocker. Our aims were to characterize the time-course of the antihypertensive activity of fimasartan via a new population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model and to define its optimal dose range. We simultaneously modelled all fimasartan plasma concentrations and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) data from 39 patients with essential hypertension and 56 healthy volunteers. Patients received placebo, 20, 60, or 180mg fimasartan every 24h for 28days and healthy volunteers received placebo or 20 to 480mg as a single oral dose or as seven doses every 24h. External validation was performed using data on 560 patients from four phase II or III studies. One turnover model each was used to describe diastolic and systolic blood pressure. The input rates into these compartments followed a circadian rhythm and were inhibited by fimasartan. The average predicted (observed) diastolic blood pressure over 24-h in patients decreased by 10.1±7.5 (12.6±9.2; mean±SD)mmHg for 20mg, 14.2±7.0 (15.1±9.3) mmHg for 60mg, and 15.9±6.8 (11.5±9.9)mmHg for 180mg daily relative to placebo. The model explained the saturation of antihypertensive activity by counter-regulation at high fimasartan concentrations. Drug effect was maximal at approximately 23ng/mL fimasartan for diastolic and 12ng/mL for systolic blood pressure. The proposed mechanism-based population model characterized the circadian rhythm of ABPM data and the antihypertensive effect of fimasartan. After internal and external model validation, 30 to 60mg oral fimasartan given once daily was predicted as optimal dose range.

Propofol target-controlled infusion modeling in rabbits: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis

This study aimed to establish a new propofol target-controlled infusion (TCI) model in animals so as to study the general anesthetic mechanism at multi-levels in vivo. Twenty Japanese white rabbits were enrolled and propofol (10 mg/kg) was administrated intravenously. Artery blood samples were collected at various time points after injection, and plasma concentrations of propofol were measured. Pharmacokinetic modeling was performed using WinNonlin software. Propofol TCI within the acquired parameters integrated was conducted to achieve different anesthetic depths in rabbits, monitored by narcotrend. The pharmacodynamics was analyzed using a sigmoidal inhibitory maximal effect model for narcotrend index (NI) versus effect-site concentration. The results showed the pharmacokinetics of propofol in Japanese white rabbits was best described by a two-compartment model. The target plasma concentrations of propofol required at light anesthetic depth was 9.77±0.23 μg/mL, while 12.52±0.69 μg/mL at deep anesthetic depth. NI was 76.17±4.25 at light anesthetic depth, while 27.41±5.77 at deep anesthetic depth. The effect-site elimination rate constant (ke0) was 0.263/min, and the propofol dose required to achieve a 50% decrease in the NI value from baseline was 11.19 μg/mL (95% CI, 10.25-13.67). Our results established a new propofol TCI animal model and proved the model controlled the anesthetic depth accurately and stably in rabbits. The study provides a powerful method for exploring general anesthetic mechanisms at different anesthetic depths in vivo.

Adaptive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling to predict propofol effect using BIS-guided anesthesia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Propofol is widely used for hypnosis induction and maintenance of general anesthesia. Its effect can be assessed using the bispectral index (BIS). Many automatic infusion systems are based in pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) models to predict the response of the patient to the drug. However, all these models do not take into account intra and inter-patient variability. An adjusted intraoperative drug administration allows faster recovery and provides post-operative side-effect mitigation

METHODS

BIS evolution and surgery-recorded propofol infusion data of a group of 60 adult patients (30 males/30 females) with ASA I/II physical status were used to test a real time PK/PD compartmental model. This new algorithm tunes three model parameters (ce50, γ and ke0), minimizing a performance function online.

RESULTS

The error in the BIS signal predicted by the real time PK/PD model was smaller than the error measured with fixed parameter equations. This model shows that ce50, γ and ke0 change with time and patients, given a mean (95% confidence interval) of 3.89 (3.52-4.26)mg/l, 4.63 (4.13-5.13) and 0.36 (0.31-0.4)min(-1), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The real time PK/PD model proposed provides a closer description of the patient real state at each sample time. This allows for greater control of the drug infusion, and thus the quantity of drug administered can be titrated to achieve the desired effect for the desired duration, and reduce unnecessary waste or post-operative effects.