Quantitative characterization of in vitro bystander effect of antibody-drug conjugates

Case report: Successful treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma with trophoblastic differentiation using Tislelizumab and Disitamab vedotin

Background

Urothelial carcinoma with trophoblastic differentiation represents an uncommon and aggressive malignancy for which there is currently no established standard treatment. Systemic chemotherapy as the main treatment has limited efficacy. However, recent research has demonstrated significant improvements in patient survival with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates. To our knowledge, this case represents the first successful application of an immune checkpoint inhibitor (Tislelizumab) combined with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (Disitamab vedotin) in the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma with trophoblastic differentiation.

Case report

We describe the case of a 36-year-old male patient diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma with trophoblastic differentiation, showing high expression of programmed death-ligand 1. Tumor progression occurred after six cycles of Tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy (gemcitabine and cisplatin) followed by five cycles of Tislelizumab monotherapy. Re-biopsy confirmed metastatic urothelial carcinoma with trophoblastic differentiation, now with epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression. Treatment with Disitamab vedotin in combination with Tislelizumab resulted in a biochemical and imaging complete response, leading to an overall survival exceeding 24 months. Notably, no grade 3 or 4 adverse events were observed during treatment.

Discussion

The prognosis of advanced urothelial carcinoma with trophoblastic differentiation is unfavorable, and the available therapeutic options are limited. Combining Tislelizumab with Disitamab vedotin presents a promising anti-tumor strategy that warrants further investigation.

Novel antibody-drug conjugates based on DXd-ADC technology

In recent years, antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) technology, which uses monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to specifically deliver effective cytotoxic payloads to tumor cells, has become a promising method of tumor targeted therapy. ADCs are a powerful class of biopharmaceuticals that link antibodies targeting specific antigens and small molecule drugs with potent cytotoxicity via a linker, thus enabling selective destruction of cancer cells while minimizing systemic toxicity. DXd is a topoisomerase I inhibitor that induces DNA damage leading to cell cycle arrest, making it an option for ADC payloads. The DXd-ADC technology, developed by Daiichi Sankyo, is a cutting-edge platform that produces a new generation of ADCs with improved therapeutic metrics and has shown significant therapeutic potential in various types of cancer. This review provides a comprehensive assessment of drugs developed with DXd-ADC technology, with a focus on mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics studies, preclinical data, and clinical outcomes for DS-8201a, U3-1402, DS-1062a, DS-7300a, DS-6157a, and DS-6000a. By integrating existing data, we aim to provide valuable insights into the current therapeutic status and future prospects of these novel agents.

T cell receptor-directed antibody-drug conjugates for the treatment of T cell-derived cancers

T cell-derived cancers are hallmarked by heterogeneity, aggressiveness, and poor clinical outcomes. Available targeted therapies are severely limited due to a lack of target antigens that allow discrimination of malignant from healthy T cells. Here, we report a novel approach for the treatment of T cell diseases based on targeting the clonally rearranged T cell receptor displayed by the cancerous T cell population. As a proof of concept, we identified an antibody with unique specificity toward a distinct T cell receptor (TCR) and developed antibody-drug conjugates, precisely recognizing and eliminating target T cells while preserving overall T cell repertoire integrity and cellular immunity. Our anti-TCR antibody-drug conjugates demonstrated effective receptor-mediated cell internalization, associated with induction of cancer cell death with strong signs of apoptosis. Furthermore, cell proliferation-inhibiting bystander effects observed on target-negative cells may contribute to the molecules' anti-tumor properties precluding potential tumor escape mechanisms. To our knowledge, this represents the first anti-TCR antibody-drug conjugate designed as custom-tailored immunotherapy for T cell-driven pathologies.

Beyond cytotoxic potency: disposition features required to design ADC payload

1. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have demonstrated impressive clinical usefulness in treating several types of cancer, with the notion of widening of the therapeutic index of the cytotoxic payload through the minimisation of the systemic toxicity. Therefore, choosing the most appropriate payload molecule is a particularly important part of the early design phase of ADC development, especially given the highly competitive environment ADCs find themselves in today.2. The focus of the current review is to describe critical attributes/considerations needed in the discovery and ultimately development of cytotoxic payloads in support of ADC design. In addition to potency, several key dispositional characteristics including solubility, permeability and bystander effect, pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and drug-drug interactions, are described as being an integral part of the integrated activities required in the design of clinically safe and useful ADC therapeutic agents.

Single-Domain Antibodies as Antibody-Drug Conjugates: From Promise to Practice-A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent potent cancer therapies that deliver highly toxic drugs to tumor cells precisely, thus allowing for targeted treatment and significantly reducing off-target effects. Despite their effectiveness, ADCs can face limitations due to acquired resistance and potential side effects.

OBJECTIVES

This study focuses on advances in various ADC components to improve both the efficacy and safety of these agents, and includes the analysis of several novel ADC formats. This work assesses whether the unique features of VHHs-such as their small size, enhanced tissue penetration, stability, and cost-effectiveness-make them a viable alternative to conventional antibodies for ADCs and reviews their current status in ADC development.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, this study focused on VHHs as components of ADCs, examining advancements and prospects from 1 January 2014 to 30 June 2024. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect and LILACS using specific terms related to ADCs and single-domain antibodies. Retrieved articles were rigorously evaluated, excluding duplicates and non-qualifying studies. The selected peer-reviewed articles were analyzed for quality and synthesized to highlight advancements, methods, payloads, and future directions in ADC research.

RESULTS

VHHs offer significant advantages for drug conjugation over conventional antibodies due to their smaller size and structure, which enhance tissue penetration and enable access to previously inaccessible epitopes. Their superior stability, solubility, and manufacturability facilitate cost-effective production and expand the range of targetable antigens. Additionally, some VHHs can naturally cross the blood-brain barrier or be easily modified to favor their penetration, making them promising for targeting brain tumors and metastases. Although no VHH-drug conjugates (nADC or nanoADC) are currently in the clinical arena, preclinical studies have explored various conjugation methods and linkers.

CONCLUSIONS

While ADCs are transforming cancer treatment, their unique mechanisms and associated toxicities challenge traditional views on bioavailability and vary with different tumor types. Severe toxicities, often linked to compound instability, off-target effects, and nonspecific blood cell interactions, highlight the need for better understanding. Conversely, the rapid distribution, tumor penetration, and clearance of VHHs could be advantageous, potentially reducing toxicity by minimizing prolonged exposure. These attributes make single-domain antibodies strong candidates for the next generation of ADCs, potentially enhancing both efficacy and safety.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates: A promising breakthrough in cancer therapy

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) provide effective cancer treatment through the selective delivery of cytotoxic payloads to the cancer cells. They offer unparalleled precision and specificity in directing drugs to cancer cells while minimizing off-target effects. Despite several advantages, there is a requirement for innovations in the molecular design of ADC owing to drug resistance, cancer heterogeneity along the adverse effects of treatment. The review critically analyses ADC function mechanisms, unraveling the intricate interplay between antibodies, linkers, and payloads in facilitating targeted drug delivery to cancer cells. The article also highlights notable advancements in antibody engineering, which aid in creating highly selective and potent ADCs. Additionally, the review details significant progress in clinical ADC development with an in-depth examination of pivotal trials and approved formulations. Antibody Drug Conjugates (ADCs) are a ground-breaking approach to targeted drug delivery, especially in cancer treatment. They offer unparalleled precision and specificity in directing drugs to cancer cells while minimizing off-target effects. This review provides a comprehensive examination of the current state of ADC development, covering their design, mechanisms of action, and clinical applications. The article emphasizes the need for greater precision in drug delivery and explains why ADCs are necessary.

The potential roles of antibody-drug conjugates in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the actual antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) tested for patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), outlining the results of safety and efficacy through published clinical trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

ADCs combine the specificity of mAbs with the cytotoxic drug (known as payload) via a chemical linker and it is designed to selectively deliver the ultratoxic payload directly to the target cancer cells. To date, various ADCs have been investigated in multiple solid malignancies and others are in clinical development. In this study, we provide an overview of the structure and biology of ADC and we review recent clinical experience with the ADC in patients with advanced HNSCC, followed by a brief discussion of the evolvement of ADC conception, drug resistance and future perspectives.

SUMMARY

ADC strategy is emerging as a potential active treatment in previously treated patients with advanced HNSCC. However, the recent improvement in the bioengineering of ADC and a better comprehension of sequencing and association strategies could provide more benefit to HNSCC patients in need of innovative therapy.

Applications of Flow Cytometry in Drug Discovery and Translational Research

Flow cytometry is a mainstay technique in cell biology research, where it is used for phenotypic analysis of mixed cell populations. Quantitative approaches have unlocked a deeper value of flow cytometry in drug discovery research. As the number of drug modalities and druggable mechanisms increases, there is an increasing drive to identify meaningful biomarkers, evaluate the relationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD), and translate these insights into the evaluation of patients enrolled in early clinical trials. In this review, we discuss emerging roles for flow cytometry in the translational setting that supports the transition and evaluation of novel compounds in the clinic.

Development and Validation of a Cell-Based Binding Neutralizing Antibody Assay for an Antibody-Drug Conjugate

The utilization of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) has gained considerable attention in the field of targeted cancer therapy due to their ability to synergistically combine the specificity of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and the potency of small molecular drugs. However, the immunogenic nature of the antibody component within ADCs warrants the need for robust immunogenicity testing, including a neutralizing antibody (NAb) assay. Since the mechanism of action (MOA) of the ADC is to first bind to the target cells and then release the payload intracellularly to kill the cells, the most relevant NAb assay format would be a cell-based killing assay. However, in this paper, we present a case where a cell-based killing assay could not be developed after multiple cell lines and NAb-positive controls (PC) had been tested. Surprisingly, contrary to our expectations, all NAb PCs tested exhibited an increased killing effect on the target cells, instead of the expected protective response. This unexpected phenomenon most likely is due to the non-specific internalization of drug/NAb complexes via FcγRs, as an excessive amount of human IgG1 and mouse IgG2a, but not mouse IgG1, greatly inhibited drug or drug/NAb complexes induced cell death. To overcome this obstacle, we implemented a novel cell-based binding assay utilizing the Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) platform. We also propose that an in vitro cell killing NAb assay is limited to at best monitoring the target binding and internalization induced cell death, but not by-stander killing induced by prematurely released or dead-cell released payload, hence cannot really mimic the in vivo MOA of ADC.

Drug conjugates for the treatment of lung cancer: from drug discovery to clinical practice

A drug conjugate consists of a cytotoxic drug bound via a linker to a targeted ligand, allowing the targeted delivery of the drug to one or more tumor sites. This approach simultaneously reduces drug toxicity and increases efficacy, with a powerful combination of efficient killing and precise targeting. Antibody‒drug conjugates (ADCs) are the best-known type of drug conjugate, combining the specificity of antibodies with the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs to reduce adverse reactions by preferentially targeting the payload to the tumor. The structure of ADCs has also provided inspiration for the development of additional drug conjugates. In recent years, drug conjugates such as ADCs, peptide‒drug conjugates (PDCs) and radionuclide drug conjugates (RDCs) have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The scope and application of drug conjugates have been expanding, including combination therapy and precise drug delivery, and a variety of new conjugation technology concepts have emerged. Additionally, new conjugation technology-based drugs have been developed in industry. In addition to chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy, drug conjugate therapy has undergone continuous development and made significant progress in treating lung cancer in recent years, offering a promising strategy for the treatment of this disease. In this review, we discuss recent advances in the use of drug conjugates for lung cancer treatment, including structure-based drug design, mechanisms of action, clinical trials, and side effects. Furthermore, challenges, potential approaches and future prospects are presented.

Current and emerging treatment approaches for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer

In the past decade, significant progress was made in treating hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC), but many clinical questions remain. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors are now widely used in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) as standard of care, having demonstrated significant progression-free survival versus ET, and also significant overall survival benefits in the metastatic setting. Inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR intracellular signaling pathway coupled with ET typically follows first-line therapies. Novel endocrine options including oral selective estrogen receptor down-regulators (SERDs) are in late phases of development, with elacestrant being the first oral SERD to be approved for ESR1-mutant mBC. However, endocrine-refractory disease is inevitable in most patients and represents an area of unmet need, with current recommended options offering poor efficacy, undesirable toxicity, and reduced quality of life. Breakthrough advances in the metastatic setting came via the development of antibody-drug conjugates, which have the advantage of delivering cytotoxic payloads to tumor cells with higher tumor selectivity. Trastuzumab deruxtecan offers a novel therapeutic option for patients with HR+/HER2-low mBC and sacituzumab govitecan is a novel therapeutic option for patients with HR+/HER2- mBC, including those with unmet treatment need in the later-line endocrine-refractory setting. Data gaps still exist regarding optimal sequencing of these novel agents; additional studies into mechanisms of resistance in the metastatic setting would provide further insights. Herein, we describe the current treatment options for HR+/HER2- mBC, including the latest practice-impacting data, and provide commentary on future directions.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antibody-drug conjugates for the treatment of patients with breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Currently three antibody-drug-conjugates (ADC) are approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for treatment of breast cancer (BC) patient: trastuzumab-emtansine, trastuzumab-deruxtecan and sacituzumab-govitecan. ADC are composed of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting a specific antigen, a cytotoxic payload and a linker. Pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) distinguish ADC from conventional chemotherapy and must be understood by clinicians.

AREAS COVERED

Our review delineates the PK/PD profiles of ADC approved for the treatment of BC with insight for future development. This is an expert opinion literature review based on the EMA's Assessment Reports, enriched by a comprehensive literature search performed on Medline in August 2023.

EXPERT OPINION

All three ADC distributions are described by a two-compartment structure: tissue and serum. Payload concentration peak is immediate but remains at low concentration. The distribution varied for all ADC only with body weight. mAb will be metabolised firstly by the saturable complex formation of ADC/Tumour-Receptor and secondly by binding of FcgRs in immune cells. They are all excreted in the bile and faeces with minimal urine elimination. Dose adjustments, apart from weight, are not recommended. Novel ADC are composed of cleavable linkers with various targets/payloads with the same PK/PD properties, but novel structures of ADC are in development.

An auristatin-based antibody-drug conjugate targeting EphA2 in pancreatic cancer treatment

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, a highly aggressive form of cancer with a poor prognosis, necessitates the development of innovative treatment strategies. Our prior research showcased the growth-inhibiting effects of the anti-EphA2 antibody drug hSD5 on pancreatic cancer tumors. This antibody targets and induces the degradation of the EphA2 receptor while also prompting the antibody's internalization. A deeper dive into the hSD5 Fab crystallographic structure and docking studies revealed that hSD5's CDRH3 drives the primary interaction between hSD5 and the EphA2 active site. In this study, we developed a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC)-the auristatin-based hSD5-vedotin specifically targeting EphA2 in pancreatic cancer cells. This ADC aims at the tumor-specific antigen EphA2, triggering endocytosis and releasing the conjugated payload molecule Monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), amplifying the tumor-killing effect. Upon cellular entry, hSD5-vedotin demonstrated an impressive tumor-killing response, inhibiting tumor cell growth and promoting apoptosis even at lower antibody concentrations. In a pancreatic cancer xenograft animal model, hSD5-vedotin showcased the potential to suppress tumor growth entirely. Notably, potential immune resistance responses were also observed in recurrent pancreatic cancer tumors. Our empirical results underscore the possibility of developing hSD5-vedotin further, which we anticipate will have a broader and more potent therapeutic impact on pancreatic cancer and other EphA2-related cancers.

Efficacy and safety analysis of a HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugate combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors: a real-world study

BACKGROUND

Disitamab Vedotin is a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) drug targeting HER2, which has shown a potential synergistic effect between Disitamab Vedotin and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Therefore, we plan to conduct a retrospective real-world study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Disitamab Vedotin monotherapy or combined with ICIs in the treatment of advanced or metastatic solid tumors.

METHODS

This retrospective study involved patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors who were treated with Disitamab Vedotin monotherapy or combined with ICIs at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from July 2019 to June 2023. The observation items included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).

RESULTS

This study included 49 patients, out of which 34 patients were treated with Disitamab Vedotin plus ICIs and 15 patients received Disitamab Vedotin alone. In all patients, the median PFS was 10 months. The 6-month and 1-year OS rates were 91.1% and 82.3%, respectively. Eighteen (36.7%) patients achieved a partial response, and sixteen (32.7%) patients had stable disease. The combination therapy of Disitamab Vedotin plus ICIs showed a higher ORR (44.1% vs. 20.0%) and a longer median PFS (14 vs. 8 months) compared to Disitamab Vedotin alone. The median PFS for patients expressed with HER2 2+/3+ was 10 months and was not reached for patients expressed with HER2 0/1+. Grade 3-4 TRAEs occurred in 14.7% of patients who received the combination treatment and in 26.7% of patients who received Disitamab Vedotin alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that Disitamab-Vedotin-based treatment, alone or in combination with ICIs, exerted considerable prognosis and good tolerance in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors, regardless of the HER2 expression levels. Whether combination therapy with ICIs provides greater therapeutic benefits compared to monotherapy needs to be further explored through randomized controlled trials.

Novel Thienoduocarmycin-Trastuzumab ADC Demonstrates Strong Antitumor Efficacy with Favorable Safety Profile in Preclinical Studies

New antibodies-drug conjugate (ADC) payloads overcoming chemoresistance and killing also poorly proliferating tumors at well-tolerated doses are much desired. Duocarmycins are a well-known class of highly potent cytotoxic agents, with DNA minor groove-binding and alkylation properties, active also in chemoresistant tumors. Although different duocarmycin derivatives have been used during the years as payloads for ADC production, unfavorable physicochemical properties impaired the production of ADCs with optimal features. Optimization of the toxin to balance reactivity and stability features and best linker selection allowed us to develop the novel duocarmycin-like payload-linker NMS-P945 suitable for conjugation to mAbs with reproducible drug-antibody ratio (DAR) >3.5. When conjugated to trastuzumab, it generated an ADC with good internalization properties, ability to induce bystander effect and immunogenic cell death. Moreover, it showed strong target-driven activity in cells and cytotoxic activity superior to trastuzumab deruxtecan tested, in parallel, in cell lines with HER2 expression. High in vivo efficacy with cured mice at well-tolerated doses in HER2-driven models was also observed. A developed pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model based on efficacy in mice and cynomolgus monkey PK data, predicted tumor regression in patients upon administration of 2 doses of trastuzumab-NMS-P945-ADC at 0.5 mg/kg. Thus, considering the superior physicochemical features for ADC production and preclinical results obtained with the model trastuzumab ADC, including bystander effect, immunogenic cell death and activity in chemoresistant tumors, NMS-P945 represents a highly effective, innovative payload for the creation of novel, next-generation ADCs.

RC48-ADC treatment for patients with HER2-expressing locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors: a real-world study

BACKGROUND

RC48-antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) link humanized anti-HER2 immunoglobulin with monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE). Clinical trials suggest promising antitumor activity in HER2-expressing solid tumors. This study probes RC48-ADC's efficacy and safety in patients with HER2-expressing advanced or metastatic solid tumors.

METHOD

Data was collected from 23 advanced cancer patients treated with RC48-ADC at our oncology center between July 2021 and December 2022. These patients exhibited at least 1 + expression of HER2 immunohistochemistry, had previously experienced at least one failed systemic chemotherapy, and were treated with RC48-ADC until the occurrence of intolerable adverse reactions or disease progression. The primary endpoint was the disease control rate (DCR), and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety.

RESULTS

23 of 25 screened patients received RC48 treatment. The ORR was 43.5% (95% CI, 23.2-63.7%) with a median PFS of 6.0 months (95% CI, 4.8-7.4). In the low-to-medium HER2 expression subgroup, ORR was 37.5%, median PFS 5.75 months. In the high HER2 expression subgroup, ORR was 57.1%, median PFS 7 months. For the cohort combining RC48 with PD-1 inhibitors, ORR was 53.8%, median PFS 8 months. In the concurrent local radiation therapy subgroup, ORR was 40.0%, median PFS 6.0 months. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were anemia (60.8%), leukopenia (56.2%), raised transaminases (52.17%), and neutropenia (43.5%). Five patients (21.7%) experienced Grade 3 symptoms, including anemia (21.7%) and neutropenia (14.0%). No Grade 4 adverse reactions or deaths were reported.

CONCLUSION

RC48-ADC shows promising efficacy and manageable safety in HER2-expressing advanced or metastatic solid tumor patients.

Antibody-drug conjugates in HER-2 negative breast cancers with poor prognosis

Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) comprise a rapidly growing class of targeted drugs that selectively deliver a cytotoxic agent to cancer cells, reducing the side effects associated with conventional chemotherapy. Breast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous entity. The need for effective therapies for HER-2 negative BCs with poor prognosis, such as triple-negative or endocrine-resistant BC, remains unmet due to the lack of potential targets for treatments. These BC subtypes are not candidates for hormonal or anti-HER-2 agents. However, ongoing clinical trials exploring the use of ADCs with a wide range of targets have shown potential for this treatment modality. In this review, we present the current state of knowledge regarding the role of ADC and speculate on novel approaches including ADC combination therapies, new molecular targets, and the role of other subclasses of ADCs (bicycle drug conjugates, bispecific ADCs, immune modulating ADCs) in this clinical scenario.

Use of Payload Binding Selectivity Enhancers to Improve Therapeutic Index of Maytansinoid-Antibody-Drug Conjugates

Systemic exposure to released cytotoxic payload contributes to the dose-limiting off-target toxicities of anticancer antibody-drug conjugates (ADC). In this work, we present an "inverse targeting" strategy to optimize the therapeutic selectivity of maytansinoid-conjugated ADCs. Several anti-maytansinoid sdAbs were generated via phage-display technology with binding IC50 values between 10 and 60 nmol/L. Co-incubation of DM4 with the anti-maytansinoid sdAbs shifted the IC50 value of DM4 up to 250-fold. Tolerability and efficacy of 7E7-DM4 ADC, an anti-CD123 DM4-conjugated ADC, were assessed in healthy and in tumor-bearing mice, with and without co-administration of an anti-DM4 sdAb. Co-administration with anti-DM4 sdAb reduced 7E7-DM4-induced weight loss, where the mean values of percentage weight loss at nadir for mice receiving ADC+saline and ADC+sdAb were 7.9% ± 3% and 3.8% ± 1.3% (P < 0.05). In tumor-bearing mice, co-administration of the anti-maytansinoid sdAb did not negatively affect the efficacy of 7E7-DM4 on tumor growth or survival following dosing of the ADC at 1 mg/kg (P = 0.49) or at 10 mg/kg (P = 0.9). Administration of 7E7-DM4 at 100 mg/kg led to dramatic weight loss, with 80% of treated mice succumbing to toxicity before the appearance of mortality relating to tumor growth in control mice. However, all mice receiving co-dosing of 100 mg/kg 7E7-DM4 with anti-DM4 sdAb were able to tolerate the treatment, which enabled reduction in tumor volume to undetectable levels and to dramatic improvements in survival. In summary, we have demonstrated the utility and feasibility of the application of anti-payload antibody fragments for inverse targeting to improve the selectivity and efficacy of anticancer ADC therapy.

Towards a platform quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) model for preclinical to clinical translation of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs)

A next generation multiscale quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) model for antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) is presented, for preclinical to clinical translation of ADC efficacy. Two HER2 ADCs (trastuzumab-DM1 and trastuzumab-DXd) were used for model development, calibration, and validation. The model integrates drug specific experimental data including in vitro cellular disposition data, pharmacokinetic (PK) and tumor growth inhibition (TGI) data for T-DM1 and T-DXd, as well as system specific data such as properties of HER2, tumor growth rates, and volumes. The model incorporates mechanistic detail at the intracellular level, to account for different mechanisms of ADC processing and payload release. It describes the disposition of the ADC, antibody, and payload inside and outside of the tumor, including binding to off-tumor, on-target sinks. The resulting multiscale PK model predicts plasma and tumor concentrations of ADC and payload. Tumor payload concentrations predicted by the model were linked to a TGI model and used to describe responses following ADC administration to xenograft mice. The model was translated to humans and virtual clinical trial simulations were performed that successfully predicted progression free survival response for T-DM1 and T-DXd for the treatment of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, including differential efficacy based upon HER2 expression status. In conclusion, the presented model is a step toward a platform QSP model and strategy for ADCs, integrating multiple types of data and knowledge to predict ADC efficacy. The model has potential application to facilitate ADC design, lead candidate selection, and clinical dosing schedule optimization.

Antibody-drug conjugates: the paradigm shifts in the targeted cancer therapy

Cancer is one of the deadliest diseases, causing million of deaths each year globally. Conventional anti-cancer therapies are non-targeted and have systemic toxicities limiting their versatile applications in many cancers. So, there is an unmet need for more specific therapeutic options that will be effective as well as free from toxicities. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are suitable alternatives with the right potential and improved therapeutic index for cancer therapy. The ADCs are highly precise new class of biopharmaceutical products that covalently linked a monoclonal antibody (mAb) (binds explicitly to a tumor-associated surface antigen) with a customized cytotoxic drug (kills cancer cells) and tied via a chemical linker (releases the drug). Due to its precise design, it brings about the target cell killing sparing the normal counterpart and free from the toxicities of conventional chemotherapy. It has never been so easy to develop potential ADCs for successful therapeutic usage. With relentless efforts, it took almost a century for scientists to advance the formula and design ADCs for its current clinical applications. Until now, several ADCs have passed successfully through preclinical and clinical trials and because of proven efficacy, a few are approved by the FDA to treat various cancer types. Even though ADCs posed some shortcomings like adverse effects and resistance at various stages of development, with continuous efforts most of these limitations are addressed and overcome to improve their efficacy. In this review, the basics of ADCs, physical and chemical properties, the evolution of design, limitations, and future potentials are discussed.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Solid Tumor Oncology: An Effectiveness Payday with a Targeted Payload

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are at the forefront of the drug development revolution occurring in oncology. Formed from three main components-an antibody, a linker molecule, and a cytotoxic agent ("payload"), ADCs have the unique ability to deliver cytotoxic agents to cells expressing a specific antigen, a great leap forward from traditional chemotherapeutic approaches that cause widespread effects without specificity. A variety of payloads can be used, including most frequently microtubular inhibitors (auristatins and maytansinoids), as well as topoisomerase inhibitors and alkylating agents. Finally, linkers play a critical role in the ADCs' effect, as cleavable moieties that serve as linkers impact site-specific activation as well as bystander killing effects, an upshot that is especially important in solid tumors that often express a variety of antigens. While ADCs were initially used in hematologic malignancies, their utility has been demonstrated in multiple solid tumor malignancies, including breast, gastrointestinal, lung, cervical, ovarian, and urothelial cancers. Currently, six ADCs are FDA-approved for the treatment of solid tumors: ado-trastuzumab emtansine and trastuzumab deruxtecan, both anti-HER2; enfortumab-vedotin, targeting nectin-4; sacituzuzmab govitecan, targeting Trop2; tisotumab vedotin, targeting tissue factor; and mirvetuximab soravtansine, targeting folate receptor-alpha. Although they demonstrate utility and tolerable safety profiles, ADCs may become ineffective as tumor cells undergo evolution to avoid expressing the specific antigen being targeted. Furthermore, the current cost of ADCs can be limiting their reach. Here, we review the structure and functions of ADCs, as well as ongoing clinical investigations into novel ADCs and their potential as treatments of solid malignancies.

Biparatopic anti-HER2 drug radioconjugates as breast cancer theranostics

BACKGROUND

HER2 is overexpressed in 25-30% of breast cancer. Multiple domains targeting of a receptor can have synergistic/additive therapeutic effects.

METHODS

Two domain-specific ADCs trastuzumab-PEG6-DM1 (domain IV) and pertuzumab-PEG6-DM1 (domain II) were developed, characterised and radiolabeled to obtain [89Zr]Zr-trastuzumab-PEG6-DM1 and [67Cu]Cu-pertuzumab-PEG6-DM1 to study their in vitro (binding assay, internalisation and cytotoxicity) and in vivo (pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and immunoPET/SPECT imaging) characteristics.

RESULTS

The ADCs had an average drug-to-antibody ratio of 3. Trastuzumab did not compete with [67Cu]Cu-pertuzumab-PEG6-DM1 for binding to HER2. The highest antibody internalisation was observed with the combination of ADCs in BT-474 cells compared with single antibodies or ADCs. The combination of the two ADCs had the lowest IC50 compared with treatment using the single ADCs or controls. Pharmacokinetics showed biphasic half-lives with fast distribution and slow elimination, and an AUC that was five-fold higher for [89Zr]Zr-trastuzumab-PEG6-DM1 compared with [67Cu]Cu-pertuzumab-PEG6-DM1. Tumour uptake of [89Zr]Zr-trastuzumab-PEG6-DM1 was 51.3 ± 17.3% IA/g (BT-474), and 12.9 ± 2.1% IA/g (JIMT-1) which was similarly to [67Cu]Cu-pertuzumab-PEG6-DM1. Mice pre-blocked with pertuzumab had [89Zr]Zr-trastuzumab-PEG6-DM1 tumour uptakes of 66.3 ± 33.9% IA/g (BT-474) and 25.3 ± 4.9% IA/g (JIMT-1) at 120 h p.i.

CONCLUSION

Using these biologics simultaneously as biparatopic theranostic agents has additive benefits.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Lung Cancer: Recent Advances and Implementing Strategies

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are one of the fastest-growing oncology therapeutics, merging the cytotoxic effect of conjugated payload with the high specific ability and selectivity of monoclonal antibody targeted on a specific cancer cell membrane antigen. The main targets for ADC development are antigens commonly expressed by lung cancer cells, but not in normal tissues. They include human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 3, trophoblast cell surface antigen 2, c-MET, carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 5, and B7-H3, each with one or more specific ADCs that showed encouraging results in the lung cancer field, more in non-small-cell lung cancer than in small-cell lung cancer histology. To date, multiple ADCs are under evaluation, alone or in combination with different molecules (eg, chemotherapy agents or immune checkpoint inhibitors), and the optimal strategy for selecting patients who may benefit from the treatment is evolving, including an improvement of biomarker understanding, involving markers of resistance or response to the payload, besides the antibody target. In this review, we discuss the available evidence and future perspectives on ADCs for lung cancer treatment, including a comprehensive discussion on structure-based drug design, mechanism of action, and resistance concepts. Data were summarized by specific target antigen, biology, efficacy, and safety, differing among ADCs according to the ADC payload and their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics properties.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates for Lung Cancer: Payloads and Progress

Antibody Drug Conjugates (ADCs) are a novel class of therapeutic that structurally comprise an antibody directed at a tumor epitope connected via a linker to a cytotoxic payload that have shown significant antitumor activity across a range of malignancies including lung cancer. In this article we review the pharmacology of ADCs, describe results of trials with ADCs directed at targets in lung cancer including Trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2(TROP2), HER3, MET, Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecular 5(CECAM-5) and HER2. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (also known as DS-8201a or T-DXd) an ADC directed at HER2 recently became the first ADC to receive FDA approval in lung cancer, on the basis of its activity in tumors with HER2 mutations, demonstrated in the Destiny-Lung01 and Lung02 trials.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Antibody-Drug Conjugates Administered via Subcutaneous and Intratumoral Routes

We hypothesize that different routes of administration may lead to altered pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) behavior of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and may help to improve their therapeutic index. To evaluate this hypothesis, here we performed PK/PD evaluation for an ADC administered via subcutaneous (SC) and intratumoral (IT) routes. Trastuzumab-vc-MMAE was used as the model ADC, and NCI-N87 tumor-bearing xenografts were used as the animal model. The PK of multiple ADC analytes in plasma and tumors, and the in vivo efficacy of ADC, after IV, SC, and IT administration were evaluated. A semi-mechanistic PK/PD model was developed to characterize all the PK/PD data simultaneously. In addition, local toxicity of SC-administered ADC was investigated in immunocompetent and immunodeficient mice. Intratumoral administration was found to significantly increase tumor exposure and anti-tumor activity of ADC. The PK/PD model suggested that the IT route may provide the same efficacy as the IV route at an increased dosing interval and reduced dose level. SC administration of ADC led to local toxicity and reduced efficacy, suggesting difficulty in switching from IV to SC route for some ADCs. As such, this manuscript provides unprecedented insight into the PK/PD behavior of ADCs after IT and SC administration and paves the way for clinical evaluation of these routes.

Payload-Binding Fab Fragments Increase the Therapeutic Index of MMAE Antibody-Drug Conjugates

Monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) is a potent tubulin inhibitor that is used as the payload for four FDA-approved antibody-drug conjugates (ADC). Deconjugated MMAE readily diffuses into untargeted cells, resulting in off-target toxicity. Here, we report the development and evaluation of a humanized Fab fragment (ABC3315) that enhances the therapeutic selectivity of MMAE ADCs. ABC3315 increased the IC50 of MMAE against human cancer cell lines by > 500-fold with no impact on the cytotoxicity of MMAE ADCs, including polatuzumab vedotin (PV) and trastuzumab-vc-MMAE (TvcMMAE). Coadministration of ABC3315 did not reduce the efficacy of PV or TvcMMAE in xenograft tumor models. Coadministration of ABC3315 with 80 mg/kg TvcMMAE significantly (P < 0.0001) increased the cumulative amount of MMAE that was excreted in urine 0 to 4 days after administration from 789.4±19.0 nanograms (TvcMMAE alone) to 2625±206.8 nanograms (for mice receiving TvcMMAE with coadministration of ABC3315). Mice receiving 80 mg/kg TvcMMAE and PBS exhibited a significant drop in white blood cell counts (P = 0.025) and red blood cell counts (P = 0.0083) in comparison with control mice. No significant differences, relative to control mice, were found for white blood cell counts (P = 0.15) or for red blood cell counts (P = 0.23) for mice treated with 80 mg/kg TvcMMAE and ABC3315. Coadministration of ABC3315 with 120 mg/kg PV significantly (P = 0.045) decreased the percentage body weight loss at nadir for treated mice from 11.9%±7.0% to 4.1%±2.1%. Our results demonstrate that ABC3315, an anti-MMAE Fab fragment, decreases off-target toxicity while not decreasing antitumor efficacy, increasing the therapeutic window of MMAE ADCs.

Mechanisms of ADC Toxicity and Strategies to Increase ADC Tolerability

Anti-cancer antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) aim to expand the therapeutic index of traditional chemotherapy by employing the targeting specificity of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to increase the efficiency of the delivery of potent cytotoxic agents to malignant cells. In the past three years, the number of ADCs approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has tripled. Although several ADCs have demonstrated sufficient efficacy and safety to warrant FDA approval, the clinical use of all ADCs leads to substantial toxicity in treated patients, and many ADCs have failed during clinical development due to their unacceptable toxicity profiles. Analysis of the clinical data has demonstrated that dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) are often shared by different ADCs that deliver the same cytotoxic payload, independent of the antigen that is targeted and/or the type of cancer that is treated. DLTs are commonly associated with cells and tissues that do not express the targeted antigen (i.e., off-target toxicity), and often limit ADC dosage to levels below those required for optimal anti-cancer effects. In this manuscript, we review the fundamental mechanisms contributing to ADC toxicity, we summarize common ADC treatment-related adverse events, and we discuss several approaches to mitigating ADC toxicity.

NAV-001, a high-efficacy antibody-drug conjugate targeting mesothelin with improved delivery of a potent payload by counteracting MUC16/CA125 inhibitory effects

Subsets of tumor-produced cell surface and secreted proteins can bind to IgG1 type antibodies and suppress their immune-effector activities. As they affect antibody and complement-mediated immunity, we call these proteins humoral immuno-oncology (HIO) factors. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) use antibody targeting to bind cell surface antigens, internalize into the cell, then kill target cells upon liberation of the cytotoxic payload. Binding of the ADC antibody component by a HIO factor may potentially hamper ADC efficacy due to reduced internalization. To determine the potential effects of HIO factor ADC suppression, we evaluated the efficacy of a HIO-refractory, mesothelin-directed ADC (NAV-001) and a HIO-bound, mesothelin-directed ADC (SS1). The HIO factor MUC16/CA125 binding to SS1 ADC was shown to have a negative effect on internalization and tumor cell killing. The MUC16/CA125 refractory NAV-001 ADC was shown to have robust killing of MUC16/CA125 expressing and non-expressing tumor cells in vitro and in vivo at single, sub-mg/kg dosing. Moreover, NAV-001-PNU, which contains the PNU-159682 topoisomerase II inhibitor, demonstrated good stability in vitro and in vivo as well as robust bystander activity of resident cells while maintaining a tolerable safety profile in vivo. Single-dose NAV-001-PNU demonstrated robust tumor regression of a number of patient-derived xenografts from different tumor types regardless of MUC16/CA125 expression. These findings suggest that identification of HIO-refractory antibodies to be used in ADC format may improve therapeutic efficacy as observed by NAV-001 and warrants NAV-001-PNU's advancement to human clinical trials as a monotherapy to treat mesothelin-positive cancers.

Case report: The remarkable response of pembrolizumab combined with RC48 in the third-line treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Systemic chemotherapy has been the mainstay treatment for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). In the past few years, novel immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have improved the treatment of advanced UC.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here, we report systemic therapy of a 68-year-old male diagnosed with HER2 positive (immunohistochemistry 3+), programmed cell death ligand 1(PD-L1) negative metastatic UC, and renal insufficiency. He had encountered numerous metastases and failed first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and second-line treatment with pembrolizumab and trastuzumab. During third-line treatment with RC48 (a HER2 targeting ADC) combined with pembrolizumab, he achieved a rapid partial response (PR) in the first evaluation and subsequent complete response (CR) on PET/CT and long-term progression-free survival (>12 months) at the last follow-up on 25 August 2022. There are no grade 3 or 4 adverse events or aggravations of renal insufficiency during the third-line therapy.

DISCUSSION

RC48 combined with pembrolizumab demonstrated outstanding efficacy and safety in this HER2-positive metastatic UC patient. ADC combined with ICI is a promising anti-tumor strategy that deserves further exploration in advanced UC.

Learn from antibody–drug conjugates: consideration in the future construction of peptide-drug conjugates for cancer therapy

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide due to high heterogeneity. Although chemotherapy remains the mainstay of cancer therapy, non-selective toxicity and drug resistance of mono-chemotherapy incur broad criticisms. Subsequently, various combination strategies have been developed to improve clinical efficacy, also known as cocktail therapy. However, conventional “cocktail administration” is just passable, due to the potential toxicities to normal tissues and unsatisfactory synergistic effects, especially for the combined drugs with different pharmacokinetic properties. The drug conjugates through coupling the conventional chemotherapeutics to a carrier (such as antibody and peptide) provide an alternative strategy to improve therapeutic efficacy and simultaneously reduce the unspecific toxicities, by virtue of the advantages of highly specific targeting ability and potent killing effect. Although 14 antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) have been approved worldwide and more are being investigated in clinical trials so far, several limitations have been disclosed during clinical application. Compared with ADCs, peptide-drug conjugates (PDCs) possess several advantages, including easy industrial synthesis, low cost, high tissue penetration and fast clearance. So far, only a handful of PDCs have been approved, highlighting tremendous development potential. Herein, we discuss the progress and pitfalls in the development of ADCs and underline what can learn from ADCs for the better construction of PDCs in the future.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates for Melanoma and Other Skin Malignancies

OPINION STATEMENT

While most skin malignancies are successfully treated with surgical excision, advanced and metastatic skin malignancies still often have poor long-term outcomes despite therapeutic advances. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) serve as a potentially promising novel therapeutic approach to treat advanced skin cancers as they combine antibody-associated antigen specificity with cytotoxic anti-tumor effects, thereby maximizing efficacy and minimizing systemic toxicity. While no ADCs have gained regulatory approval for advanced skin cancers, several promising agents are undergoing preclinical and clinical investigation. In addition to identifying and validating skin cancer antigen targets, the key to maximizing therapeutic success is the careful development of each component of the ADC complex: antibodies, cytotoxic drugs, and linkers. It is the optimization of each of these components that will be integral in overcoming resistance, maximizing safety, and improving long-term clinical outcomes.

Potential of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) for cancer therapy

The primary purpose of ADCs is to increase the efficacy of anticancer medications by minimizing systemic drug distribution and targeting specific cells. Antibody conjugates (ADCs) have changed the way cancer is treated. However, because only a tiny fraction of patients experienced long-term advantages, current cancer preclinical and clinical research has been focused on combination trials. The complex interaction of ADCs with the tumor and its microenvironment appear to be reliant on the efficacy of a certain ADC, all of which have significant therapeutic consequences. Several clinical trials in various tumor types are now underway to examine the potential ADC therapy, based on encouraging preclinical results. This review tackles the potential use of ADCs in cancer therapy, emphasizing the essential processes underlying their positive therapeutic impacts on solid and hematological malignancies. Additionally, opportunities are explored to understand the mechanisms of ADCs action, the mechanism of resistance against ADCs, and how to overcome potential resistance following ADCs administration. Recent clinical findings have aroused interest, leading to a large increase in the number of ADCs in clinical trials. The rationale behind ADCs, as well as their primary features and recent research breakthroughs, will be discussed. We then offer an approach for maximizing the potential value that ADCs can bring to cancer patients by highlighting key ideas and distinct strategies.

HER2 Inhibition in Gastric Cancer-Novel Therapeutic Approaches for an Established Target

Gastric cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression of HER2 gene amplification is present in 20% of gastric cancers and defines a subset amenable to HER2-directed therapeutics. The seminal ToGA study led to routine use of the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab in conjunction to platinum-fluoropyridimine first-line chemotherapy for HER2-positive gastric cancers as standard-of-care. Although limited progress was made in the decade following ToGA, there is now an abundance of novel therapeutic approaches undergoing investigation in parallel. Additionally, new data from randomised trials have indicated efficacy of the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan in chemorefractory patients and increased responses with the addition of first-line immune checkpoint blockade to trastuzumab and chemotherapy. This review will outline the data supporting HER2 targeting in gastric cancers, discuss mechanisms of response and resistance to HER2-directed therapies and summarise the emerging therapies under clinical evaluation that may evolve the way we manage this subset of gastric cancers in the future.

Development of and insights from systems pharmacology models of antibody‐drug conjugates

Antibody‐drug conjugates (ADCs) have gained traction in the oncology space in the past few decades, with significant progress being made in recent years. Although the use of pharmacometric modeling is well‐established in the drug development process, there is an increasing need for a better quantitative biological understanding of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationships of these complex molecules. Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) approaches can assist in this endeavor; recent computational QSP models incorporate ADC‐specific mechanisms and use data‐driven simulations to predict experimental outcomes. Various modeling approaches and platforms have been developed at the in vitro, in vivo, and clinical scales, and can be further integrated to facilitate preclinical to clinical translation. These new tools can help researchers better understand the nature and mechanisms of these targeted therapies to help achieve a more favorable therapeutic window. This review delves into the world of systems pharmacology modeling of ADCs, discussing various modeling efforts in the field thus far.

Structure-Activity Relationships of Antibody-Drug Conjugates: A Systematic Review of Chemistry on the Trastuzumab Scaffold

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a rapidly growing class of cancer therapeutics that seek to overcome the low therapeutic index of conventional cytotoxic agents. However, realizing this goal has been a significant challenge. ADCs comprise several independently modifiable components, including the antibody, payload, linker, and bioconjugation method. Many approaches have been developed to improve the physical properties, potency, and selectivity of ADCs. The anti-HER-2 antibody trastuzumab, first approved in 1998, has emerged as an exceptional targeting agent for ADCs, as well as a broadly used platform for testing new technologies. The extensive work in this area enables the comparison of various linker strategies, payloads, drug-to-antibody ratios (DAR), and mode of attachment. In this review, these conjugates, ranging from the first clinically approved trastuzumab ADC, ado-trastuzumab emtansine (Kadcyla), to the latest variants are described with the goal of providing a broad overview, as well as enabling the comparison of existing and emerging conjugate technologies.

Nano-Based Approved Pharmaceuticals for Cancer Treatment: Present and Future Challenges

Cancer is one of the main causes of death worldwide. To date, and despite the advances in conventional treatment options, therapy in cancer is still far from optimal due to the non-specific systemic biodistribution of antitumor agents. The inadequate drug concentrations at the tumor site led to an increased incidence of multiple drug resistance and the appearance of many severe undesirable side effects. Nanotechnology, through the development of nanoscale-based pharmaceuticals, has emerged to provide new and innovative drugs to overcome these limitations. In this review, we provide an overview of the approved nanomedicine for cancer treatment and the rationale behind their designs and applications. We also highlight the new approaches that are currently under investigation and the perspectives and challenges for nanopharmaceuticals, focusing on the tumor microenvironment and tumor disseminate cells as the most attractive and effective strategies for cancer treatments.

Therapeutic efficacy of antibody-drug conjugates targeting GD2-positive tumors

BACKGROUND

Both ganglioside GD2-targeted immunotherapy and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have demonstrated clinical success as solid tumor therapies in recent years, yet no research has been carried out to develop anti-GD2 ADCs against solid tumors. This is the first study to analyze cytotoxic activity of clinically relevant anti-GD2 ADCs in a wide panel of cell lines with varying GD2 expression and their effects in mouse models of GD2-positive solid cancer.

METHODS

Anti-GD2 ADCs were generated based on the GD2-specific antibody ch14.18 approved for the treatment of neuroblastoma and commonly used drugs monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) or F (MMAF), conjugated via a cleavable linker by thiol-maleimide chemistry. The antibody was produced in a mammalian expression system, and its specific binding to GD2 was analyzed. Antigen-binding properties and biodistribution of the ADCs in mice were studied in comparison with the parent antibody. Cytotoxic effects of the ADCs were evaluated in a wide panel of GD2-positive and GD2-negative tumor cell lines of neuroblastoma, glioma, sarcoma, melanoma, and breast cancer. Their antitumor effects were studied in the B78-D14 melanoma and EL-4 lymphoma syngeneic mouse models.

RESULTS

The ch14.18-MMAE and ch14.18-MMAF ADCs retained antigen-binding properties of the parent antibody. Direct dependence of the cytotoxic effect on the level of GD2 expression was observed in cell lines of different origin for both ADCs, with IC50 below 1 nM for the cells with high GD2 expression and no cytotoxic effect for GD2-negative cells. Within the analyzed cell lines, ch14.18-MMAF was more effective in the cells overexpressing GD2, while ch14.18-MMAE had more prominent activity in the cells expressing low GD2 levels. The ADCs had a similar biodistribution profile in the B78-D14 melanoma model compared with the parent antibody, reaching 7.7% ID/g in the tumor at 48 hours postinjection. The average tumor size in groups treated with ch14.18-MMAE or ch14.18-MMAF was 2.6 times and 3.8 times smaller, respectively, compared with the control group. Antitumor effects of the anti-GD2 ADCs were also confirmed in the EL-4 lymphoma model.

CONCLUSION

These findings validate the potential of ADCs targeting ganglioside GD2 in treating multiple GD2-expressing solid tumors.

Development and Biochemical Characterization of Self-Immolative Linker Containing GnRH-III-Drug Conjugates

The human gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH-I) and its sea lamprey analogue GnRH-III specifically bind to GnRH receptors on cancer cells and can be used as targeting moieties for targeted tumor therapy. Considering that the selective release of drugs in cancer cells is of high relevance, we were encouraged to develop cleavable, self-immolative GnRH-III-drug conjugates which consist of a p-aminobenzyloxycarbonlyl (PABC) spacer between a cathepsin B-cleavable dipeptide (Val-Ala, Val-Cit) and the classical anticancer drugs daunorubicin (Dau) and paclitaxel (PTX). Alongside these compounds, non-cleavable GnRH-III-drug conjugates were also synthesized, and all compounds were analyzed for their antiproliferative activity. The cleavable GnRH-III bioconjugates revealed a growth inhibitory effect on GnRH receptor-expressing A2780 ovarian cancer cells, while their activity was reduced on Panc-1 pancreatic cancer cells exhibiting a lower GnRH receptor level. Moreover, the antiproliferative activity of the non-cleavable counterparts was strongly reduced. Additionally, the efficient cleavage of the Val-Ala linker and the subsequent release of the drugs could be verified by lysosomal degradation studies, while radioligand binding studies ensured that the GnRH-III-drug conjugates bound to the GnRH receptor with high affinity. Our results underline the high value of GnRH-III-based homing devices and the application of cathepsin B-cleavable linker systems for the development of small molecule drug conjugates (SMDCs).

Drug Conjugation via Maleimide-Thiol Chemistry Does Not Affect Targeting Properties of Cysteine-Containing Anti-FGFR1 Peptibodies

With a wide range of available cytotoxic therapeutics, the main focus of current cancer research is to deliver them specifically to the cancer cells, minimizing toxicity against healthy tissues. Targeted therapy utilizes different carriers for cytotoxic drugs, combining a targeting molecule, typically an antibody, and a highly toxic payload. For the effective delivery of such cytotoxic conjugates, a molecular target on the cancer cell is required. Various proteins are exclusively or abundantly expressed in cancer cells, making them a possible target for drug carriers. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) overexpression has been reported in different types of cancer, but no FGFR1-targeting cytotoxic conjugate has been approved for therapy so far. In this study, the FGFR1-targeting peptide previously described in the literature was reformatted into a peptibody-peptide fusion with the fragment crystallizable (Fc) domain of IgG1. PeptibodyC19 can be effectively internalized into FGFR1-overexpressing cells and does not induce cells' proliferation. The main challenge for its use as a cytotoxic conjugate is a cysteine residue located within the targeting peptide. A standard drug-conjugation strategy based on the maleimide-thiol reaction involves modification of cysteines within the Fc domain hinge region. Applied here, however, may easily result in the modification of the targeting peptide with the drug, limiting its affinity to the target and therefore the potential for specific drug delivery. To investigate if this is the case, we have performed conjugation reactions with different auristatin derivatives (PEGylated and unmodified) under various conditions. By controlling the reduction conditions and the type of cytotoxic payload, different numbers of cysteines were substituted, allowing us to avoid conjugating the drug to the targeting peptide, which could affect its binding to FGFR1. The optimized protocol with PEGylated auristatin yielded doubly substituted peptibodyC19, showing specific cytotoxicity toward the FGFR1-expressing lung cancer cells, with no effect on cells with low FGFR1 levels. Indeed, additional cysteine poses a risk of unwanted modification, but changes in the type of cytotoxic payload and reaction conditions allow the use of standard thiol-maleimide-based conjugation to achieve standard Fc hinge region cysteine modification, analogously to antibody-drug conjugates.

Bystander effect of antibody-drug conjugates: fact or fiction?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Summarizing the current preclinical and clinical evidence about bystander effect of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in solid tumors.

RECENT FINDINGS

One of the main challenges of treating solid tumors with ADCs is the heterogeneous expression of the target antigen (Ag), which however may be overcome by the so-called bystander killing effect. This unique, but still debated, feature of certain ADCs is represented by the unintentional payload diffusion from Ag-positive tumor cells to adjacent Ag-negative tumor cells. Some pharmacological characteristics, such as a hydrophobic payload or a cleavable linker, seem to play a major role in this effect. Abundant preclinical evidence of the bystander effect has emerged, and the clinical activity of ADCs in tumors with a heterogeneous Ag expression suggests the relevance of this feature. Additional studies are required to investigate if the bystander effect is necessary for achieving a solid activity with ADCs.

Actively Targeted Nanomedicines in Breast Cancer: From Pre-Clinal Investigation to Clinic

Simple Summary

Despite all the efforts and advances made in the treatment of breast cancer, this pathology continues to be one of the main causes of cancer death in women, particularly triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and, although to a lesser degree, HER-2 receptor-positive tumors. Chemotherapy is one of the main treatments available. However, it shows numerous limitations due to its lack of selectivity. In this sense, the selective delivery of antineoplastics to cancer cells can reduce their adverse effects and increase their efficacy. The use of active targeted nanomedicine is a good strategy to achieve this selective chemotherapy. In fact, in recent decades, several active targeted nanoformulations have been approved or reached clinical investigation with excellent results. Among all nanomedicines, antibody-drug conjugates are the most promising.

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed tumors and the second leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide. The use of nanosystems specifically targeted to tumor cells (active targeting) can be an excellent therapeutic tool to improve and optimize current chemotherapy for this type of neoplasm, since they make it possible to reduce the toxicity and, in some cases, increase the efficacy of antineoplastic drugs. Currently, there are 14 nanomedicines that have reached the clinic for the treatment of breast cancer, 4 of which are already approved (Kadcyla^®, Enhertu^®, Trodelvy^®, and Abraxane^®). Most of these nanomedicines are antibody–drug conjugates. In the case of HER-2-positive breast cancer, these conjugates (Kadcyla^®, Enhertu^®, Trastuzumab-duocarmycin, RC48, and HT19-MMAF) target HER-2 receptors, and incorporate maytansinoid, deruxtecan, duocarmicyn, or auristatins as antineoplastics. In TNBC these conjugates (Trodelvy^®, Glembatumumab-Vedotin, Ladiratuzumab-vedotin, Cofetuzumab-pelidotin, and PF-06647263) are directed against various targets, in particular Trop-2 glycoprotein, NMB glycoprotein, Zinc transporter LIV-1, and Ephrin receptor-4, to achieve this selective accumulation, and include campthotecins, calicheamins, or auristatins as drugs. Apart from the antibody–drug conjugates, there are other active targeted nanosystems that have reached the clinic for the treatment of these tumors such as Abraxane^® and Nab-rapamicyn (albumin nanoparticles entrapping placlitaxel and rapamycin respectively) and various liposomes (MM-302, C225-ILS-Dox, and MM-310) loaded with doxorubicin or docetaxel and coated with ligands targeted to Ephrin A2, EPGF, or HER-2 receptors. In this work, all these active targeted nanomedicines are discussed, analyzing their advantages and disadvantages over conventional chemotherapy as well as the challenges involved in their lab to clinical translation. In addition, examples of formulations developed and evaluated at the preclinical level are also discussed.

Development of a Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Whole-Body Disposition of MMAE Containing Antibody-Drug Conjugate in Mice

PURPOSE

To quantitate and mathematically characterize the whole-body pharmacokinetics (PK) of different ADC analytes following administration of an MMAE-conjugated ADC in tumor-bearing mice.

METHODS

The PK of different ADC analytes (total antibody, total drug, unconjugated drug) was measured following administration of an MMAE-conjugated ADC in tumor-bearing mice. The PK of ADC analytes was compared with the whole-body PK of the antibody and drug obtained following administration of these molecules alone. An ADC PBPK model was developed by linking antibody PBPK model with small-molecule PBPK model, where the drug was assumed to deconjugate in DAR-dependent manner.

RESULTS

Comparison of antibody biodistribution coefficient (ABC) values for total antibody suggests that conjugation of drug did not significantly affect the PK of antibody. Comparison of tissue:plasma AUC ratio (T/P) for the conjugated drug and total antibody suggests that in certain tissues (e.g., spleen) ADC may demonstrate higher deconjugation. It was observed that the tissue distribution profile of the drug can be altered following its conjugation to antibody. For example, MMAE distribution to the liver was found to increase while its distribution to the heart was found to decrease upon conjugation to antibody. MMAE exposure in the tumor was found to increase by ~20-fold following administration as conjugate (i.e., ADC). The PBPK model was able to a priori predict the PK of all three ADC analytes in plasma, tissues, and tumor reasonably well.

CONCLUSIONS

The ADC PBPK model developed here serves as a platform for translational and clinical investigations of MMAE containing ADCs.

Antibody-drug conjugate and free geldanamycin combination therapy enhances anti-cancer efficacy

Antibody drug-conjugates (ADCs) targeting human epidermal growth factor (HER2) are a rapidly expanding class of cancer therapeutics. Such ADCs are known to suffer from inefficient trafficking to the lysosome due to HER2 endosomal recycling, leaving most bound ADCs at the cell surface or in early endosomes. This study aims to increase the maximum cytotoxicity of ADC treatment by co-delivering a small molecule inhibitor targeting the primary chaperone of HER2, heat shock protein 90 (HSP90). We hypothesized that inhibiting HSP90 could aid ADC cytotoxicity by overcoming HER2 endosomal recycling. Flow cytometric studies tracking HER2 surface expression revealed ∼ 10 nM geldanamycin (GA) as the threshold for inhibiting HSP90 mediated HER2 recycling. Cytotoxicity studies in HER2 overexpressing cancer cell lines NCI-N87, MDA-MB-453, and SKOV3 demonstrated that co-administration of ADC alongside 100 nM GA significantly increased cytotoxicity compared to ADC alone. In all cases, baseline cytotoxicity was observed even in low HER2 expressing line MDA-MB-231 cells, indicating possible off-target effects. To mitigate this baseline cytotoxicity, a "pulse treatment" regime was adopted where cells are pre-loaded with T-DM1 or T-MMAE ADCs for 4 h, followed by a 4-hour pulse treatment with ADC and 100 nM GA to initiate trafficking of HER2 bound ADC to the lysosome. Afterwards, GA is removed, and ADC treatment is continued. GA pulse co-treatment decreased the amount of ADC required to achieve maximum cytotoxicity while minimizing baseline cytotoxicity. No such co-treatment regime featuring a pulse sequence has been explored before. Such co-treatments could offer a viable solution to increase ADC efficacy in hard to treat or resistant HER2-positive cancers.

Pharmacokinetics of Monoclonal Antibody and Antibody Fragments in the Mouse Eye Following Systemic Administration

The ocular pharmacokinetics (PK) of antibody-based therapies are infrequently studied in mice due to the technical difficulties in working with the small murine eye. This study is the first of its kind to quantitatively measure the PK of variously sized proteins in the plasma, cornea/ICB, vitreous humor, retina, and posterior cup (including choroid) of the mouse and to evaluate the relationship between molecular weight (MW) and antibody biodistribution coefficient (BC) to the eye. Proteins analyzed include trastuzumab (150 kDa), trastuzumab-vc-MMAE (T-vc-MMAE, 155 kDa), F(ab)₂ (100 kDa), Fab (50 kDa), and scFv (27 kDa). As expected, ocular PK mirrored the systemic PK as plasma was the driving force for ocular exposure. For trastuzumab, T-vc-MMAE, F(ab)₂, Fab, and scFv, respectively, the BCs in the cornea/ICB were 0.610%, 0.475%, 1.74%, 3.39%, and 13.7%; the BCs in the vitreous humor were 0.0198%, 0.0427%, 0.0934%, 0.234%, and 5.56%; the BCs for the retina were 0.539%, 0.230%, 0.704%, 2.44%, and 20.4%; the BCs for the posterior cup were 0.557%, 0.650%, 1.47%, 4.06%, and 13.9%. The relationship between BC and MW was best characterized by a log–log regression in which BC decreased as MW increased, with every doubling in MW leading to a decrease in BC by a factor of 3.44 × , 6.76 × , 4.74 × , and 3.43 × in cornea/ICB, vitreous humor, retina, and posterior cup, respectively. In analyzing the disposition of protein therapeutics to the eye, these findings enhance our understanding of the potential for ocular toxicity of systemically administered protein therapeutics and may aid in the discovery of systemically administered protein therapeutics for ocular disorders.

Antibody-Antineoplastic Conjugates in Gynecological Malignancies: Current Status and Future Perspectives

In the last decade, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), normally formed by a humanized antibody and a small drug via a chemical cleavable or non-cleavable linker, have emerged as a potential treatment strategy in cancer disease. They allow to get a selective delivery of the chemotherapeutic agents at the tumor level, and, consequently, to improve the antitumor efficacy and, especially to decrease chemotherapy-related toxicity. Currently, nine antibody-drug conjugate-based formulations have been already approved and more than 80 are under clinical trials for the treatment of several tumors, especially breast cancer, lymphomas, and multiple myeloma. To date, no ADCs have been approved for the treatment of gynecological formulations, but many formulations have been developed and have reached the clinical stage, especially for the treatment of ovarian cancer, an aggressive disease with a low five-year survival rate. This manuscript analyzes the ADCs formulations that are under clinical research in the treatment of gynecological carcinomas, specifically ovarian, endometrial, and cervical tumors.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Functional Principles and Applications in Oncology and Beyond

In the era of precision medicine, antibody-based therapeutics are rapidly enriched with emerging advances and new proof-of-concept formats. In this context, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have evolved to merge the high selectivity and specificity of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with the cytotoxic potency of attached payloads. So far, ten ADCs have been approved by FDA for oncological indications and many others are currently being tested in clinical and preclinical level. This paper summarizes the essential components of ADCs, from their functional principles and structure up to their limitations and resistance mechanisms, focusing on all latest bioengineering breakthroughs such as bispecific mAbs, dual-drug platforms as well as novel linkers and conjugation chemistries. In continuation of our recent review on anticancer implication of ADC's technology, further insights regarding their potential usage outside of the oncological spectrum are also presented. Better understanding of immunoconjugates could maximize their efficacy and optimize their safety, extending their use in everyday clinical practice.

Targeting nectin-4 by antibody-drug conjugates for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Nectin-4 is a tumor-associated antigen overexpressed in urothelial carcinoma and several other malignancies. It has emerged as a compelling target for novel tumor-directed therapies, particularly as a component of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), a growing class of anti-cancer therapeutic agents. Development of nectin-4-directed therapies has been led by enfortumab vedotin (EV), an ADC comprised of a fully human monoclonal antibody specific for nectin-4 conjugated via a cleavable linker to the microtubule inhibitor MMAE. EV was approved in 2019 as a first-in-class agent for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma.

AREAS COVERED

This article discusses general principles relevant to ADC design and our current understanding of nectin-4 in normal physiology and malignancy, followed by a review of the development of EV as well as additional drug conjugate strategies targeting nectin-4.

EXPERT OPINION

EV offers proof-of-concept for the clinical utility of nectin-4-directed therapies and provides further support for ADCs as an important class of anti-cancer agents. Future development of nectin-4-targeted approaches will benefit from a deeper understanding of nectin-4 biology in both health and disease, as well as a detailed exploration of the mechanisms underlying therapeutic activity and resistance.

Uncialamycin-based antibody-drug conjugates: Unique enediyne ADCs exhibiting bystander killing effect

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as valuable targeted anticancer therapeutics with at least 11 approved therapies and over 80 advancing through clinical trials. Enediyne DNA-damaging payloads represented by the flagship of this family of antitumor agents, N-acetyl calicheamicin [Formula: see text], have a proven success track record. However, they pose a significant synthetic challenge in the development and optimization of linker drugs. We have recently reported a streamlined total synthesis of uncialamycin, another representative of the enediyne class of compounds, with compelling synthetic accessibility. Here we report the synthesis and evaluation of uncialamycin ADCs featuring a variety of cleavable and noncleavable linkers. We have discovered that uncialamycin ADCs display a strong bystander killing effect and are highly selective and cytotoxic in vitro and in vivo.

Antibody-drug conjugates, immune-checkpoint inhibitors, and their combination in breast cancer therapeutics

INTRODUCTION

Advanced breast cancer (aBC) remains incurable and the quest for more effective systemic anticancer agents continues. Promising results have led to the FDA approval of three antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and two immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to date for patients with aBC.

AREAS COVERED

With the anticipated emergence of newer ADCs and ICIs for patients with several subtypes of breast cancer, and given their potential synergy, their use in combination is of clinical interest. In this article, we review the use of ADCs and ICIs in patients with breast cancer, assess the scientific rationale for their combination, and provide an overview of ongoing trials and some early efficacy and safety results of such dual therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Improvement in the medicinal chemistry of next-generation ADCs, their rational combination with ICIs and other agents, and the development of multiparametric immune biomarkers could help to significantly improve the outlook for patients with refractory aBC.

Unlocking the potential of antibody-drug conjugates for cancer therapy

Nine different antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are currently approved as cancer treatments, with dozens more in preclinical and clinical development. The primary goal of ADCs is to improve the therapeutic index of antineoplastic agents by restricting their systemic delivery to cells that express the target antigen of interest. Advances in synthetic biochemistry have ushered in a new generation of ADCs, which promise to improve upon the tissue specificity and cytotoxicity of their predecessors. Many of these drugs have impressive activity against treatment-refractory cancers, although hurdles impeding their broader use remain, including systemic toxicity, inadequate biomarkers for patient selection, acquired resistance and unknown benefit in combination with other cancer therapies. Emerging evidence indicates that the efficacy of a given ADC depends on the intricacies of how the antibody, linker and payload components interact with the tumour and its microenvironment, all of which have important clinical implications. In this Review, we discuss the current state of knowledge regarding the design, mechanism of action and clinical efficacy of ADCs as well as the apparent limitations of this treatment class. We then propose a path forward by highlighting several hypotheses and novel strategies to maximize the potential benefit that ADCs can provide to patients with cancer.