Opportunity costs and financial incentives for Hispanic youth participating in a family-based HIV and substance use preventive intervention

Start-Up and Implementation Costs for the Trust Based Relational Intervention

Capturing costs associated with prevention activities related to substance use disorders (SUD) and mental health (MH) is critical. In this study, Trust Based Relational Intervention (TBRI®), an attachment-based, trauma-informed intervention, is conceptualized as a preventive intervention to reduce substance and opioid use among youth involved with the legal system. When implemented alongside community reentry, TBRI leverages family systems as youth transition from secure residential care into communities through emotional guidance and role modeling. Activity-based cost (ABC) analysis was used to guide cost data collection and analysis for both start-up and implementation of the TBRI intervention. Start-up costs were estimated using data across eight sites during their start-up phase. All components, activities, personnel involved, and time associated with implementation of TBRI sessions according to protocol were defined. National wages were extracted from O*NET and utilized to calculate total costs for each TBRI component. Total and average TBRI intervention costs were calculated with a breakdown by TBRI sessions and number of staff and participants. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to estimate TBRI implementation costs with travel. The total cost for the TBRI intervention, representing 42 sessions, ranges from $6,927, without travel expenses or $12,298, with travel expenses. The average per family cost ranges from $1,385 (without travel) to $2,460 (with travel). Costs are primarily generated by time investments from primary interventionists. The sensitivity analysis shows costs for responsive coaching would double with travel costs included. Results aim to show that using ABC for prevention activities, like TBRI, to understand cost drivers can facilitate future intervention sustainability.Clinical Trail.gov ID: NCT04678960.

A randomized controlled trial of guided self-change with minority adolescents

OBJECTIVE

Adolescent substance use and abuse is a pressing public health problem and is strongly related to interpersonal aggression. Such problems disproportionately impact minority youth, who have limited access to evidence-based interventions such as ecological family therapies, brief motivational interventions (BMIs), and cognitive behavioral therapies (CBTs). With a predominantly minority sample, our objective was to rigorously evaluate the efficacy of a school-based BMI/CBT, Guided Self-Change (GSC), for addressing substance use and aggressive behavior.

METHOD

We conducted a school-based randomized, controlled trial with 514 high school students (mean age 16.24 years, 41% female, 80% minority) reporting using substances and perpetrating aggression. We used structural equation modeling to compare participants randomly assigned to receive GSC or standard care (SC; education/assessment/referral-only) at posttreatment and at 3 and 6 months posttreatment on alcohol use, drug use, and interpersonal aggression outcomes as assessed by the Timeline Follow-Back.

RESULTS

Compared with SC participants, GSC participants showed significant reductions (p < .05) in total number of alcohol use days (Cohen's d = 0.45 at posttreatment and 0.20 at 3 months posttreatment), drug use days (Cohen's d = 0.22 at posttreatment and 0.20 at 3 months posttreatment), and aggressive behavior incidents (Cohen's d = 0.23 at posttreatment). Moreover, treatment effects did not vary by gender or ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

With minority youth experiencing mild to moderate problems with substance use and aggressive behavior, GSC holds promise as an early intervention approach that can be implemented with success in schools.