ABL1 tyrosine kinase domain mutations in chronic myeloid leukemia treatment resistance

Current and emerging tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in young adults

INTRODUCTION

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is more common in older adults, but nearly 15-20% of the patients is between 15 and 39 years of age. In this age group, patients may seek clinical care a much later period of the disease and they may have a heavier burden of disease. In addition, young patients with CML may face unique challenges related to their age, such as concerns about health care, fertility, or careers. The current standard of care for CML is the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which induce remission in most young patients and can achieve long-term disease control.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes age-specific treatment-related conditions, as well as the effectiveness of TKI therapy in this age group. PubMed, Google Scholar, clinicaltrials.gov and other abstract databases were used while preparing this review. The period of 2001-2023 was chosen as the search window.

EXPERT OPINION

Although we do not have sufficient data, young adult population has a special importance for TKI treatment. Clinical features, efficacy of treatments, and specific conditions in this age group should attract more attention of clinicians and more intensive studies should be conducted in the future.

The Clinical Significance of BCR-ABL1 Mutations in Patients With Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Underwent Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

The global standard therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). One of the causes of therapeutic resistance to some TKIs corresponds to point mutations in the BCR-ABL1 fusion gene. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a treatment option for high-risk CML, including TKI resistance. Although BCR-ABL1 point mutations comprise a major factor in the assessment of the indications for HCT, there is limited evidence for their significance in relation to transplant outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the profiles and transplant outcomes of BCR-ABL1 mutations in allografted patients with CML. The retrospective study used a nationwide registry data including adult patients with CML who underwent their first HCT between 2006 and 2016. The inclusion criterion was the evaluation of the status of the BCR-ABL1 mutation before HCT. The cohort included 315 patients with a median age of 44 years (range 16-70 years). Point mutations were detected in 152 patients, of which 101 (66%) harbored T315I mutations and 51 harbored mutations other than T315I (non-T315I). With a median follow-up period of 38 months (range 2-114 months), overall survival (OS) at 3 years was worse in the mutation group than in the no-mutation group (53% versus 71%; P = .002), which was validated by multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-2.2; P = .038); this difference was remarkable in the chronic phase of CML. OS in the non-T315I group was significantly worse than that in the no-mutation group (HR = 1.69; 95% CI, 1.0-2.8; P = .035). The nationwide study has successfully evaluated the BCR-ABL1 mutational profile and its outcomes in patients with CML who received HCT. The mortality risk was significantly higher in patients with the BCR-ABL1 mutation than in patients without the mutation. These findings would be useful to understand the clinical significance of various BCR-ABL1 mutations in CML and provide insight into the on mid need for treatment strategies for cases of CML with BCR-ABL1 mutations.

Practical Laboratory Tools for Monitoring of BCR-ABL1 Transcripts and Tyrosine Kinase (TK) Domain Mutations in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Undergoing TK Inhibitor Therapy: A Single-Center Experience in Thailand

Objective:

The genetic hallmark of CML is known as the appearance of t(9;22)(q34.1;q11.2) (BCR-ABL1) which is present in more than 95% of cases. Here, we demonstrated practical laboratory tools for monitoring of BCR-ABL1 transcripts in chronic myeloid leukemia patients undergoing TK inhibitor therapy.

Methods:

Real time quantitative PCR and direct sequencing were performed for monitoring of BCR-ABL1 transcripts in 245 treated CML.

Results:

At month 3 after first time point of monitoring, we found that 89% (218/245), 2% (5/245), and 9% (22/245) of patients are determined as optimal, warning, and failure response, respectively. The responses to TKI were slightly decreased at months 6 as following 73% optimal (180/245), 18% warning (43/245), and 9% failure response (22/245). Additionally, responses to TKI were gradually decreased at month 12 after first time point of monitoring as following 65% optimal (160/245), 13% warning (31/245), and 22% failure (54/245). We could detect 20% (49/245) of patients positive for BCR-ABL1 TKD mutations. Interestingly, one third (17 of 49) of TKD mutated cases were positive for compound/polyclonal mutation patterns. While major molecular response were observed in the majority of patients without TKD mutation, resistant to TKI were detected in patients with T315I mutation (n = 9; % mean IS = 8.1510, % median IS = 9.7000), compound/polyclonal mutations with T315I (n = 9; % mean IS = 13.0779, % median IS = 5.404), and other TKD mutations (n = 14; % mean IS = 8.1416, % median IS = 1.060), respectively.

Conlusion:

These practical laboratory techniques provided a more comprehensive understanding of CML progression during drug therapy and could be of benefit in earlier prognosis.