Resistance to obinutuzumab-induced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity caused by abnormal Fas signaling is overcome by combination therapies

Steroid Premedication and Monoclonal Antibody Therapy: Should We Reconsider?

OPINION STATEMENT

Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy is now considered a main component of cancer therapy in Australia. Although traditionally thought of as pure signalling inhibitors, a large proponent of these medications function through antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC). Currently, most protocols and institutional guidelines for ADCC-mediated mAbs promote the use of corticosteroids as premedication: this is implemented to reduce infusion-related reactions (IRRs) and antiemesis prophylaxis and combat concurrently administered chemotherapy-related syndromes. Concerningly, the inhibitory effects of ADCC by corticosteroids are well documented; henceforth, it is possible the current standard of care is misaligned to the literature surrounding ADCC. Subsequently, clinicians' decisions to act in contrast to this literature may be reducing the efficacy of mAbs. The literature suggests that the redundant use of corticosteroids should be cautioned against when used in conjunction with ADCC-mediated mAbs-this is due to the consequent reduction in anti-tumour activity. Owing to the fact IRRs typically occur upon initial infusion, the authors advocate for individual clinicians and institutional protocols to considering augmenting their practice to corticosteroid premedication at the first dose only, unless clinically indicated. Additionally, product information (PI) and consumer medicine information (CMI) documents distributed by Australian and international regulatory agencies should consider disclosing the risk of concurrent steroids with these medications. Moreover, the authors suggest considering alternative medications for the management of side effects.

Risk of Infections Secondary to the Use of Targeted Therapies in Hematological Malignancies

Concurrent infections in hematological malignancies (HM) are major contributors to adverse clinical outcomes, including prolonged hospitalization and reduced life expectancy. Individuals diagnosed with HM are particularly susceptible to infectious pathogens due to immunosuppression, which can either be inherent to the hematological disorder or induced by specific therapeutic strategies. Over the years, the treatment paradigm for HM has witnessed a tremendous shift, from broad-spectrum treatment approaches to more specific targeted therapies. At present, the therapeutic landscape of HM is constantly evolving due to the advent of novel targeted therapies and the enhanced utilization of these agents for treatment purposes. By initiating unique molecular pathways, these agents hinder the proliferation of malignant cells, consequently affecting innate and adaptive immunity, which increases the risk of infectious complications. Due to the complexity of novel targeted therapies and their associated risks of infection, it often becomes a daunting task for physicians to maintain updated knowledge in their clinical practice. The situation is further aggravated by the fact that most of the initial clinical trials on targeted therapies provide inadequate information to determine the associated risk of infection. In such a scenario, a cumulative body of evidence is paramount in guiding clinicians regarding the infectious complications that can arise following targeted therapies. In this review, I summarize the recent knowledge on infectious complications arising in the context of targeted therapies for HM.

Improved Therapy of B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma by Obinutuzumab-Dianthin Conjugates in Combination with the Endosomal Escape Enhancer SO1861

Immunotoxins do not only bind to cancer-specific receptors to mediate the elimination of tumor cells through the innate immune system, but also increase target cytotoxicity by the intrinsic toxin activity. The plant glycoside SO1861 was previously reported to enhance the endolysosomal escape of antibody-toxin conjugates in non-hematopoietic cells, thus increasing their cytotoxicity manifold. Here we tested this technology for the first time in a lymphoma in vivo model. First, the therapeutic CD20 antibody obinutuzumab was chemically conjugated to the ribosome-inactivating protein dianthin. The cytotoxicity of obinutuzumab-dianthin (ObiDi) was evaluated on human B-lymphocyte Burkitt’s lymphoma Raji cells and compared to human T-cell leukemia off-target Jurkat cells. When tested in combination with SO1861, the cytotoxicity for target cells was 131-fold greater than for off-target cells. In vivo imaging in a xenograft model of B-cell lymphoma in mice revealed that ObiDi/SO1861 efficiently prevents tumor growth (51.4% response rate) compared to the monotherapy with ObiDi (25.9%) and non-conjugated obinutuzumab (20.7%). The reduction of tumor volume and overall survival was also improved. Taken together, our results substantially contribute to the development of a combination therapy with SO1861 as a platform technology to enhance the efficacy of therapeutic antibody-toxin conjugates in lymphoma and leukemia.

Coadministration with bendamustine restores the antitumor activity of obinutuzumab in obinutuzumab-resistant tumors

BACKGROUND

The glycoengineered, humanized anti-CD20 antibody obinutuzumab is indicated for previously untreated or relapsed/refractory CD20-positive follicular lymphoma (FL). However, the effectiveness of obinutuzumab retreatment in relapsed/refractory FL after prior obinutuzumab-containing therapy is unclear. To address this issue, we investigated the antitumor activity of obinutuzumab plus bendamustine in obinutuzumab-resistant tumors established from a human non-Hodgkin lymphoma xenograft model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Obinutuzumab-resistant tumors (SU-DHL-4-OR-18-8) were established from an SU-DHL-4 xenograft model by repeated administration of obinutuzumab. Antitumor activity was evaluated based on tumor volume after treatment with obinutuzumab on Day 1, 8, and 15 and/or bendamustine on Day 1 and 2. Intratumoral natural killer (NK) cells/macrophages were evaluated by immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry.

RESULTS

In SU-DHL-4-OR-18-8 xenografted tumors, intratumoral NK cells/macrophages after obinutuzumab treatment were significantly decreased compared with parent tumors on Day 4. The endoplasmic reticulum stress sensor phospho-IRE1 was also decreased. In SU-DHL-4-OR-18-8 tumors, bendamustine treatment increased phospho-IRE1 on Day 4 and intratumor NK cells/macrophages on Day 10. Obinutuzumab combined with bendamustine significantly increased antitumor activity compared with each single agent on Day 29, with an increase in chemoattractant CCL6 expression on Day 10.

CONCLUSIONS

Coadministration of bendamustine in obinutuzumab retreatment may be effective against obinutuzumab-resistant tumors.