1
|
Maksoud Z, Schmidt MA, Huang Y, Rutzner S, Mansoorian S, Weissmann T, Bert C, Distel L, Semrau S, Lettmaier S, Eyüpoglu I, Fietkau R, Putz F. Transient Enlargement in Meningiomas Treated with Stereotactic Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061547. [PMID: 35326697 PMCID: PMC8946188 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Accurate assessment of treatment efficacy is a prerequisite for the improvement in therapeutic outcomes in clinical trials. However, it is very challenging to accurately track the size of meningiomas after radiotherapy, because of their complex shapes and often slow growth. Measuring the whole tumor volume as opposed to simple diameter measurements to assess treatment efficacy, therefore, is very promising but little is known on expected volumetric changes of meningiomas following radiotherapy. Therefore, in this study, we meticulously investigated volumetric changes in meningiomas following radiotherapy incorporating volumetric measurements from 468 MRI studies and evaluated newly proposed RANO volumetric criteria in the context of radiotherapy. We found that temporary tumor enlargement after radiotherapy overall was rare but occurred significantly more frequently after high than after low single doses of radiation, represented an important differential diagnosis to tumor progression and would have skewed results in a clinical trial if not accounted for. Abstract To investigate the occurrence of pseudoprogression/transient enlargement in meningiomas after stereotactic radiotherapy (RT) and to evaluate recently proposed volumetric RANO meningioma criteria for response assessment in the context of RT. Sixty-nine meningiomas (benign: 90%, atypical: 10%) received stereotactic RT from January 2005–May 2018. A total of 468 MRI studies were segmented longitudinally during a median follow-up of 42.3 months. Best response and local control were evaluated according to recently proposed volumetric RANO criteria. Transient enlargement was defined as volumetric increase ≥20% followed by a subsequent regression ≥20%. The mean best volumetric response was −23% change from baseline (range, −86% to +19%). According to RANO, the best volumetric response was SD in 81% (56/69), MR in 13% (9/69) and PR in 6% (4/69). Transient enlargement occurred in only 6% (4/69) post RT but would have represented 60% (3/5) of cases with progressive disease if not accounted for. Transient enlargement was characterized by a mean maximum volumetric increase of +181% (range, +24% to +389 %) with all cases occurring in the first year post-RT (range, 4.1–10.3 months). Transient enlargement was significantly more frequent with SRS or hypofractionation than with conventional fractionation (25% vs. 2%, p = 0.015). Five-year volumetric control was 97.8% if transient enlargement was recognized but 92.9% if not accounted for. Transient enlargement/pseudoprogression in the first year following SRS and hypofractionated RT represents an important differential diagnosis, especially because of the high volumetric control achieved with stereotactic RT. Meningioma enlargement during subsequent post-RT follow-up and after conventional fractionation should raise suspicion for tumor progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziad Maksoud
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (Z.M.); (Y.H.); (S.R.); (S.M.); (T.W.); (C.B.); (L.D.); (S.S.); (S.L.); (R.F.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (M.A.S.); (I.E.)
| | - Manuel Alexander Schmidt
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (M.A.S.); (I.E.)
- Department of Neuroradiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Yixing Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (Z.M.); (Y.H.); (S.R.); (S.M.); (T.W.); (C.B.); (L.D.); (S.S.); (S.L.); (R.F.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (M.A.S.); (I.E.)
| | - Sandra Rutzner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (Z.M.); (Y.H.); (S.R.); (S.M.); (T.W.); (C.B.); (L.D.); (S.S.); (S.L.); (R.F.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (M.A.S.); (I.E.)
| | - Sina Mansoorian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (Z.M.); (Y.H.); (S.R.); (S.M.); (T.W.); (C.B.); (L.D.); (S.S.); (S.L.); (R.F.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (M.A.S.); (I.E.)
| | - Thomas Weissmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (Z.M.); (Y.H.); (S.R.); (S.M.); (T.W.); (C.B.); (L.D.); (S.S.); (S.L.); (R.F.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (M.A.S.); (I.E.)
| | - Christoph Bert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (Z.M.); (Y.H.); (S.R.); (S.M.); (T.W.); (C.B.); (L.D.); (S.S.); (S.L.); (R.F.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (M.A.S.); (I.E.)
| | - Luitpold Distel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (Z.M.); (Y.H.); (S.R.); (S.M.); (T.W.); (C.B.); (L.D.); (S.S.); (S.L.); (R.F.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (M.A.S.); (I.E.)
| | - Sabine Semrau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (Z.M.); (Y.H.); (S.R.); (S.M.); (T.W.); (C.B.); (L.D.); (S.S.); (S.L.); (R.F.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (M.A.S.); (I.E.)
| | - Sebastian Lettmaier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (Z.M.); (Y.H.); (S.R.); (S.M.); (T.W.); (C.B.); (L.D.); (S.S.); (S.L.); (R.F.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (M.A.S.); (I.E.)
| | - Ilker Eyüpoglu
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (M.A.S.); (I.E.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (Z.M.); (Y.H.); (S.R.); (S.M.); (T.W.); (C.B.); (L.D.); (S.S.); (S.L.); (R.F.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (M.A.S.); (I.E.)
| | - Florian Putz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (Z.M.); (Y.H.); (S.R.); (S.M.); (T.W.); (C.B.); (L.D.); (S.S.); (S.L.); (R.F.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (M.A.S.); (I.E.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-9131-853-4080
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim M, Chang JH, Lee NK. Quantitative analysis of extraocular muscle volume and exophthalmos reduction after radiation therapy to treat Graves' ophthalmopathy: A pilot study. Eur J Ophthalmol 2019; 31:340-345. [PMID: 31496266 DOI: 10.1177/1120672119873841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to provide radiological information on the inherent response of Graves' ophthalmopathy after radiation therapy. METHODS Quantitative analysis of extraocular muscle volume was performed on 96 involved extraocular muscles in a total of 16 patients. A total of 48 computed tomography images were analyzed. Exophthalmos was also measured. The percentage reductions in extraocular muscle volume and exophthalmos length were determined and compared to the pre-radiation therapy values at 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 21.5 months (range: 7.2-29.4 months). The mean reduction in relative tumor volume compared to the pre-radiation therapy extraocular muscle volume was 46.1% (range: 33.3%-58.8%). The mean relative extraocular muscle volumes were 71.5% at 6 months, 59.2% at 12 months, and 54.3% at 24 months after radiation therapy. The volume of the involved extraocular muscles decreased rapidly within the first 12 months of follow-up. The mean pre-radiation therapy length of exophthalmos was 21.7 mm (range: 17.6-26.1 mm). The mean percentages of exophthalmos length by comparison with the pre-radiation therapy length were 96.7% at 6 months, 92.3% at 12 months, and 88.5% at 24 months after radiation therapy. Exophthalmos decreased slowly and steadily during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION Quantitative volumetric analysis of the pattern of extraocular muscle volume reduction and exophthalmos length reduction in response to radiation therapy will allow clinicians to better understand the effect of radiotherapy on Graves' ophthalmopathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myungsoo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ji Hyun Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Nam Kwon Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Medical Center, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brahimi Y, Antoni D, Srour R, Wagner P, Proust F, Thiery A, Labani A, Noël G. [Skull base meningioma: Clinical and radiological efficacy based on a quantitative volumetric analysis]. Cancer Radiother 2019; 23:290-295. [PMID: 31128988 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2018.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2017] [Revised: 06/23/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To date, no correlation has been found between clinical and radiological efficacy after irradiation of skull base meningiomas. However, the evaluation of the radiological response was most often made by questionable methods that may have underestimated the radiological effectiveness of radiotherapy. The objective of this work is to verify this hypothesis by quantitative volumetric analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data from 35 patients treated with either helical tomotherapy (45.7%) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (54.3%) were retrospectively analysed. These were mainly women (94%) aged 59 (43-81) with lesions mainly of the cavernous sinus (60%). There was a median of 2 (1-4) symptoms and the main symptoms were visual impairment (39%), cranial nerve deficits (23.4%) and headaches (17.2%). RESULTS Median tumour volume decreased significantly (P<0.05) from 9.6mL (0.3-36.6) to 6.8mL (0.1-26.5) after median follow-up of 44 months (24-77). Sixty-three percent of patients had an improvement of at least one symptom. In univariate analysis, clinical efficacy (P<0.05), radiotherapy technique (P<0.05), tumor topography (P<0.05) and initial tumor volume (P<0.05) were predictive factors for radiological response. In multivariate analysis, only the inverse correlation between radiological response and initial tumor volume remained significant (ρ: -0.47 95% CI -3.2 to 5.7; P<0.05). CONCLUSION The quantitative volumetric monitoring demonstrates a major radiological efficiency of radiotherapy. However, no clear correlation between clinical and radiological efficacy was found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Brahimi
- University radiation oncology department, centre Paul-Strauss, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - D Antoni
- University radiation oncology department, centre Paul-Strauss, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France; Laboratory of radiobiology, EA 3430, Federation of translational medicine, Strasbourg (FMTS), Strasbourg university, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - R Srour
- Neurosurgery department, hôpital Pasteur, 39, avenue de la Liberté, 68000 Colmar, France
| | - P Wagner
- Department of radiology, centre Paul-Strauss, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - F Proust
- Neurosurgery department, CHU de Strasbourg, 1, rue Molière, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - A Thiery
- Epidemiology and biostatistics department, centre Paul-Strauss, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - A Labani
- Department of radiology, CHU de Strasbourg, 1, place de l'Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - G Noël
- University radiation oncology department, centre Paul-Strauss, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France; Laboratory of radiobiology, EA 3430, Federation of translational medicine, Strasbourg (FMTS), Strasbourg university, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Brahimi Y, Antoni D, Srour R, Proust F, Cebula H, Labani A, Noël G. [Base of the skull meningioma: Efficacy, clinical tolerance and radiological evaluation after radiotherapy]. Cancer Radiother 2018; 22:264-286. [PMID: 29773473 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2017] [Revised: 09/15/2017] [Accepted: 09/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Skull base meningioma leads to functional disturbances, which can significantly alter the quality of life. The optimal management of these lesions, whose goals are neurological preservation and tumour local control, is not yet clearly established. It is widely recognized that the goal of a radical excision should be abandoned despite the advances in the field of microsurgery of skull base lesions. Although less morbid, partial tumour excision would be associated with increased risk of local tumour recurrence. Although discussed both exclusive and adjuvant have proven to be highly successful in terms of clinical improvement and local control. Various radiation techniques have demonstrated their efficacy in the management of this pathology. However, high rates of clinical improvement are in contrast with low rates of radiological improvement. The notion of clinical and radiological dissociation appeared. However, in most of these studies, the analysis of the radiological response could be subject of legitimate criticism. This work proposes to review the local control, the efficacy and the clinical tolerance and the radiological response of the various radiation techniques for the meningioma of the base of the skull and to demonstrate the interest of quantitative volumetric analyses in the follow-up of meningioma after radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Brahimi
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - D Antoni
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France; Laboratoire de radiobiologie, UMR 7178 institut pluridisciplinaire Hubert-Curien (IPHC), université de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France; CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - R Srour
- Service de neurochirurgie, hôpital Pasteur, 39, avenue de la Liberté, 68024 Colmar cedex, France
| | - F Proust
- Service de neurochirurgie, hôpital universitaire de Strasbourg, 1, rue Molière, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - H Cebula
- Service de neurochirurgie, hôpital universitaire de Strasbourg, 1, rue Molière, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - A Labani
- Service de radiologie, hôpital universitaire de Strasbourg, 1, place de l'Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - G Noël
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France; Laboratoire de radiobiologie, UMR 7178 institut pluridisciplinaire Hubert-Curien (IPHC), université de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France; CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
| |
Collapse
|