Intraarterial drug delivery for glioblastoma mutiforme: Will the phoenix rise again?

Focused Delivery of Chemotherapy to Augment Surgical Management of Brain Tumors

Chemotherapy as an adjuvant therapy that has largely failed to significantly improve outcomes for aggressive brain tumors; some reasons include a weak blood brain barrier penetration and tumor heterogeneity. Recently, there has been interest in designing effective ways to deliver chemotherapy to the tumor. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of focused chemotherapies that are currently under investigation. Nanoparticle delivery demonstrates both a superior permeability and retention. However, thus far, it has not demonstrated a therapeutic efficacy for brain tumors. Convection-enhanced delivery is an invasive, yet versatile method, which appears to have the greatest potential. Other vehicles, such as angiopep-2 decorated gold nanoparticles, polyamidoamine dendrimers, and lipid nanostructures have demonstrated efficacy through sustained release of focused chemotherapy and have either improved cell death or survival in humans or animal models. Finally, focused ultrasound is a safe and effective way to disrupt the blood brain barrier and augment other delivery methods. Clinical trials are currently underway to study the safety and efficacy of these methods in combination with standard of care.

Involvement of Resveratrol against Brain Cancer: A Combination Strategy with a Pharmaceutical Approach

A brain tumor (BT) is a condition in which there is growth or uncontrolled development of the brain cells, which usually goes unrecognized or is diagnosed at the later stages. Since the mechanism behind BT is not clear, and the various physiological conditions are difficult to diagnose, the success rate of BT is not very high. This is the central issue faced during drug development and clinical trials with almost all types of neurodegenerative disorders. In the first part of this review, we focus on the concept of brain tumors, their barriers, and the types of delivery possible to target the brain cells. Although various treatment methods are available, they all have side effects or toxic effects. Hence, in the second part, a correlation was made between the use of resveratrol, a potent antioxidant, and its advantages for brain diseases. The relationship between brain disease and the blood–brain barrier, multi-drug resistance, and the use of nanomedicine for treating brain disorders is also mentioned. In short, a hypothetical concept is given with a background investigation into the use of combination therapy with resveratrol as an active ingredient, the possible drug delivery, and its formulation-based approach.

Glioblastoma: Current Status, Emerging Targets, and Recent Advances

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly malignant brain tumor characterized by a heterogeneous population of genetically unstable and highly infiltrative cells that are resistant to chemotherapy. Although substantial efforts have been invested in the field of anti-GBM drug discovery in the past decade, success has primarily been confined to the preclinical level, and clinical studies have often been hampered due to efficacy-, selectivity-, or physicochemical property-related issues. Thus, expansion of the list of molecular targets coupled with a pragmatic design of new small-molecule inhibitors with central nervous system (CNS)-penetrating ability is required to steer the wheels of anti-GBM drug discovery endeavors. This Perspective presents various aspects of drug discovery (challenges in GBM drug discovery and delivery, therapeutic targets, and agents under clinical investigation). The comprehensively covered sections include the recent medicinal chemistry campaigns embarked upon to validate the potential of numerous enzymes/proteins/receptors as therapeutic targets in GBM.

Drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier for the treatment of pediatric brain tumors - An update

Even though the last decade has seen a surge in the identification of molecular targets and targeted therapies in pediatric brain tumors, the blood brain barrier (BBB) remains a significant challenge in systemic drug delivery. This continues to undermine therapeutic efficacy. Recent efforts have identified several strategies that can facilitate enhanced drug delivery into pediatric brain tumors. These include invasive methods such as intra-arterial, intrathecal, and convection enhanced delivery and non-invasive technologies that allow for transient access across the BBB, including focused ultrasound and nanotechnology. This review discusses current strategies that are being used to enhance delivery of different therapies across the BBB to the tumor site - a major unmet need in pediatric neuro-oncology.

Modulating the Blood-Brain Barrier: A Comprehensive Review

The highly secure blood-brain barrier (BBB) restricts drug access to the brain, limiting the molecular toolkit for treating central nervous system (CNS) diseases to small, lipophilic drugs. Development of a safe and effective BBB modulator would revolutionise the treatment of CNS diseases and future drug development in the area. Naturally, the field has garnered a great deal of attention, leading to a vast and diverse range of BBB modulators. In this review, we summarise and compare the various classes of BBB modulators developed over the last five decades-their recent advancements, advantages and disadvantages, while providing some insight into their future as BBB modulators.

Status Quo and Trends of Intra-Arterial Therapy for Brain Tumors: A Bibliometric and Clinical Trials Analysis

Intra-arterial drug delivery circumvents the first-pass effect and is believed to increase both efficacy and tolerability of primary and metastatic brain tumor therapy. The aim of this update is to report on pertinent articles and clinical trials to better understand the research landscape to date and future directions. Elsevier's Scopus and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were reviewed in August 2021 for all possible articles and clinical trials of intra-arterial drug injection as a treatment strategy for brain tumors. Entries were screened against predefined selection criteria and various parameters were summarized. Twenty clinical trials and 271 articles satisfied all inclusion criteria. In terms of articles, 201 (74%) were primarily clinical and 70 (26%) were basic science, published in a total of 120 different journals. Median values were: publication year, 1986 (range, 1962-2021); citation count, 15 (range, 0-607); number of authors, 5 (range, 1-18). Pertaining to clinical trials, 9 (45%) were phase 1 trials, with median expected start and completion years in 2011 (range, 1998-2019) and 2022 (range, 2008-2025), respectively. Only one (5%) trial has reported results to date. Glioma was the most common tumor indication reported in both articles (68%) and trials (75%). There were 215 (79%) articles investigating chemotherapy, while 13 (65%) trials evaluated targeted therapy. Transient blood-brain barrier disruption was the commonest strategy for articles (27%) and trials (60%) to optimize intra-arterial therapy. Articles and trials predominately originated in the United States (50% and 90%, respectively). In this bibliometric and clinical trials analysis, we discuss the current state and trends of intra-arterial therapy for brain tumors. Most articles were clinical, and traditional anti-cancer agents and drug delivery strategies were commonly studied. This was reflected in clinical trials, of which only a single study had reported outcomes. We anticipate future efforts to involve novel therapeutic and procedural strategies based on recent advances in the field.

A Multifaceted Approach to Optimizing AAV Delivery to the Brain for the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases

Despite major advancements in gene therapy technologies, there are no approved gene therapies for diseases which predominantly effect the brain. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors have emerged as the most effective delivery vector for gene therapy owing to their simplicity, wide spread transduction and low immunogenicity. Unfortunately, the blood-brain barrier (BBB) makes IV delivery of AAVs, to the brain highly inefficient. At IV doses capable of widespread expression in the brain, there is a significant risk of severe immune-mediated toxicity. Direct intracerebral injection of vectors is being attempted. However, this method is invasive, and only provides localized delivery for diseases known to afflict the brain globally. More advanced methods for AAV delivery will likely be required for safe and effective gene therapy to the brain. Each step in AAV delivery, including delivery route, BBB transduction, cellular tropism and transgene expression provide opportunities for innovative solutions to optimize delivery efficiency. Intra-arterial delivery with mannitol, focused ultrasound, optimized AAV capsid evolution with machine learning algorithms, synthetic promotors are all examples of advanced strategies which have been developed in pre-clinical models, yet none are being investigated in clinical trials. This manuscript seeks to review these technological advancements, and others, to improve AAV delivery to the brain, and to propose novel strategies to build upon this research. Ultimately, it is hoped that the optimization of AAV delivery will allow for the human translation of many gene therapies for neurodegenerative and other neurologic diseases.

Potentially Detrimental Effects of Hyperosmolality in Patients Treated for Traumatic Brain Injury

Hyperosmotic therapy is commonly used to treat intracranial hypertension in traumatic brain injury patients. Unfortunately, hyperosmolality also affects other organs. An increase in plasma osmolality may impair kidney, cardiac, and immune function, and increase blood–brain barrier permeability. These effects are related not only to the type of hyperosmotic agents, but also to the level of hyperosmolality. The commonly recommended osmolality of 320 mOsm/kg H₂O seems to be the maximum level, although an increase in plasma osmolality above 310 mOsm/kg H₂O may already induce cardiac and immune system disorders. The present review focuses on the adverse effects of hyperosmolality on the function of various organs.

Single-shot bevacizumab for cerebral radiation injury

Background

Cerebral radiation injury, including subacute radiation reactions and later stage radiation necrosis, is a severe side effect of brain tumor radiotherapy. A protocol of four infusions of the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab has been shown to be a highly effective treatment. However, bevacizumab is costly and can cause severe complications including thrombosis, bleeding and gastrointestinal perforations.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients treated in our clinic for cerebral radiation injury who received only a singular treatment with bevacizumab. Single-shot was defined as a singular administration of bevacizumab without a second administration during an interval of at least 6 weeks.

Results

We identified 11 patients who had received a singular administration of bevacizumab to treat cerebral radiation injury. Prior radiation had been administered to treat gliomas (ten patients) or breast cancer brain metastases (one patient). 9 of 10 patients with available MRIs showed a marked reduction of edema at first follow-up. Discontinuation of Dexamethasone was possible in 6 patients and a significant dose reduction could be achieved in all other patients. One patient developed pulmonary artery embolism 2 months after bevacizumab administration. The median time to treatment failure of any cause was 3 months.

Conclusions

Single-shot bevacizumab therefore has meaningful activity in cerebral radiation injury, but durable control is rarely achieved. In patients where a complete protocol of four infusions with bevacizumab is not feasible due to medical contraindications or lack of reimbursement, single-shot bevacizumab treatment may be considered.

Interventional neuro-oncology

Interventional neuro-oncology encompasses an array of image-guided therapies-intra-arterial chemotherapy, regional drug delivery, chemoembolization, tumor ablation-along with techniques to improve therapy delivery such as physical or chemical blood-brain barrier disruption and percutaneous catheter placement. Endovascular and percutaneous image-guided approaches to the treatment of the brain, eye, and other head and neck tumors will be discussed.

Pharmacokinetic Principles and Their Application to Central Nervous System Tumors

Despite increasing knowledge of the biologic drivers of central nervous system tumors, most targeted agents trialed to date have not shown activity against these tumors in clinical trials. To effectively treat central nervous system tumors, an active drug must achieve and maintain an effective exposure at the tumor site for a long enough period of time to exert its intended effect. However, this is difficult to assess and achieve due to the constraints of drug delivery to the central nervous system. To address this complex problem, an understanding of pharmacokinetic principles is necessary. Pharmacokinetics is classically described as the quantitative study of drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination. The innate chemical properties of a drug, its administration (dose, route and schedule), and host factors all influence these four key pharmacokinetic phases. The central nervous system adds a level of complexity to standard plasma pharmacokinetics as it is a coupled drug compartment. This review will discuss special considerations of pharmacokinetics in the context of therapeutic development for central nervous system tumors.

Severe Periocular Edema after Intraarterial Carboplatin Chemotherapy for Retinoblastoma in a Rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) Model

Endovascular microcatheter-based intraarterial (ophthalmic artery) chemotherapy is becoming widely used for the clinical treatment of intraocular retinoblastoma due to its apparent increased efficacy compared with traditional intravenous chemotherapy; however local ocular complications are not uncommon. Carboplatin is a chemotherapeutic agent used in both intravenous and intraarterial chemotherapy. We used rabbits to assess pharmacokinetics and ocular and systemic toxicity after intraarterial carboplatin infusion. Subsequent to unilateral intraarterial administration of carboplatin, severe unilateral or bilateral periocular edema occurred in 6 adult male New Zealand white rabbits. Time to onset varied from less than 4 h after administration (n = 3, 50 mg) to approximately 24 h afterward (n = 3, 25 mg). After becoming symptomatic, 5 of the 6 animals were promptly euthanized, and the remaining animal (25 mg treatment) was medically managed for 4 d before being euthanized due to intractable edema-related lagophthalmos. Globes and orbits from all 6 euthanized rabbits were harvested en bloc; whole-mount sections were prepared for histologic evaluation, which revealed drug-induced vasogenic edema in confined spaces as the main underlying pathogenesis. Transient and self-limiting periocular edema is a common side effect of intraarterial chemotherapy but is thought to occur predominantly with melphalan monotherapy or combination therapy using melphalan, carboplatin, and topotecan. The severity of this adverse consequence in rabbits was unexpected, and its use in the study was subsequently discontinued. Although the definitive cause for this vasotoxicity and striking clinical presentation is unknown, we suspect species-specific anatomic features and sensitivity might have contributed to amplified complications after intraarterial carboplatin chemotherapy of the eye. Due to the adverse effects of intraarterial carboplatin chemotherapy that we observed in 2 experimental cohorts of rabbits, we recommend caution regarding its use in this species.

Overview of Current Drug Delivery Methods Across the Blood-Brain Barrier for the Treatment of Primary Brain Tumors

Existing drug delivery methods have not led to a significant increase in survival for patients with malignant primary brain tumors. While the combination of conventional therapies consisting of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy has improved survival for some types of brain tumors (e.g., WNT medulloblastoma), other types of brain tumors (e.g., glioblastoma and diffuse midline glioma) still have a poor prognosis. The reason for the differences in response can be largely attributed to the blood-brain barrier (BBB), a specialized structure at the microvasculature level that regulates the transport of molecules across the blood vessels into the brain parenchyma. This structure hampers the delivery of most chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of primary brain tumors. Several drug delivery methods such as nanoparticles, convection enhanced delivery, focused ultrasound, intranasal delivery, and intra-arterial delivery have been developed to overcome the BBB in primary brain tumors. However, prognosis of most primary brain tumors still remains poor. The heterogeneity of the BBB in primary brain tumors and the distinct vasculature of tumors make it difficult to design a drug delivery method that targets the entire tumor. Drug delivery methods that combine strategies such as focused ultrasound and nanoparticles might be a more successful approach. However, more research is needed to optimize and develop new drug delivery techniques to improve survival of patients with primary brain tumors.

Combined high-dose intra-arterial and intrathecal chemotherapy for the treatment of a case of extraocular retinoblastoma

Patients with retinoblastoma and central nervous system (CNS) involvement are rarely curable with available treatments. We designed a high-dose intra-arterial regimen targeting the ophthalmic artery and chiasm combined with intrathecal chemotherapy to treat a 4-year-old patient with retinoblastoma metastasized to the CNS. After three cycles of this regimen, including carboplatin, melphalan, and intrathecal topotecan, a partial response of the orbital tumor mass and chiasmatic lesion, and complete response in the cerebrospinal fluid and bone marrow were achieved. This new treatment strategy may be explored as a treatment component for patients with overt extraocular retinoblastoma and CNS dissemination.

Challenges in the Treatment of Glioblastoma: Multisystem Mechanisms of Therapeutic Resistance

Glioblastoma is one of the most lethal human cancers, with poor survival despite surgery, radiation treatment, and chemotherapy. Advances in the treatment of this type of brain tumor are limited because of several resistance mechanisms. Such mechanisms involve limited drug entry into the central nervous system compartment by the blood-brain barrier and by actions of the normal brain to counteract tumor-targeting medications. In addition, the vast heterogeneity in glioblastoma contributes to significant therapeutic resistance by preventing adequate control of the entire tumor mass by a single drug and by facilitating escape mechanisms from targeted agents. The stem cell-like characteristics of glioblastoma promote resistance to chemotherapy, radiation, and immunotherapy through upregulation of efflux transporters, promotion of glioblastoma stem cell proliferation in neurogenic zones, and immune suppression, respectively. Metabolic cascades in glioblastoma prevent effective treatments through the optimization of glucose use, the use of alternative nutrient precursors for energy production, and the induction of hypoxia to enhance tumor growth. In the era of precision medicine, an assortment of molecular techniques is being developed to target an individual's unique tumor, with the hope that this personalized strategy will bypass therapeutic resistance. Although each resistance mechanism presents an array of challenges to effective treatment of glioblastoma, as the field recognizes and addresses these difficulties, future treatments may have more efficacy and promise for patients with glioblastoma.

A Distinct Advantage to Intraarterial Delivery of 89Zr-Bevacizumab in PET Imaging of Mice With and Without Osmotic Opening of the Blood-Brain Barrier

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive and common type of brain cancer. Five-year survival rates are below 12%, even with the most aggressive trimodal therapies. Poor blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability of therapeutics is a major obstacle to efficacy. Intravenous administration of bevacizumab is the standard treatment for GBM. It has been recently demonstrated that a single intraarterial infusion of bevacizumab provides superior therapeutic outcomes in patients with recurrent GBM. Further GBM treatment benefits can be achieved through opening of the BBB before intraarterial infusion of bevacizumab. However, a rationale for intraarterial delivery and BBB opening when delivering antibodies is lacking. A method facilitating quantification of intraarterial delivery of bevacizumab is needed for more effective and personalized GBM treatment. Here, we demonstrate such a method using PET imaging of radiolabeled bevacizumab. Methods: Bevacizumab was conjugated with deferoxamine and subsequently radiolabeled with ⁸⁹Zr. ⁸⁹Zr-bevacizumab deferoxamine (⁸⁹Zr-BVDFO) was prepared with a specific radioactivity of 81.4 ± 7.4 MBq/mg (2.2 ± 0.2 μCi/mg). Brain uptake of ⁸⁹Zr-BVDFO on carotid artery and tail vein infusion with an intact BBB or with BBB opening with mannitol was initially monitored by dynamic PET, followed by whole-body PET/CT at 1 and 24 h after infusion. Th ex vivo biodistribution of ⁸⁹Zr-BVDFO was also determined. Results: Intraarterial administration of ⁸⁹Zr-BVDFO resulted in gradual accumulation of radioactivity in the ipsilateral hemisphere, with 9.16 ± 2.13 percentage injected dose/cm³ at the end of infusion. There was negligible signal observed in the contralateral hemisphere. BBB opening with mannitol before intraarterial infusion of ⁸⁹Zr-BVDFO resulted in faster and higher uptake in the ipsilateral hemisphere (23.58 ± 4.46 percentage injected dose/cm³) and negligible uptake in the contralateral hemisphere. In contrast, intravenous infusion of ⁸⁹Zr-BVDFO and subsequent BBB opening did not lead to uptake of radiotracer in the brain. The ex vivo biodistribution results validated the PET/CT studies. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that intraarterial delivery of bevacizumab into the brain across an osmotically opened BBB is effective, in contrast to the intravenous route.

Computational pharmacokinetic rationale for intra-arterial delivery to the brain

Intra-arterial (IA) drug delivery has been proposed for the treatment of a wide range of brain diseases, including malignant brain tumors. However, pharmacokinetic optimization for IA drug delivery to the brain remains a challenge. In this report, we apply and expand the well-established Dedrick model of IA drug delivery to the brain and test the effects of modifying drug and delivery parameters. These simulations show that altering the properties of candidate drugs and physiological variables can have profound effects on regional deposition after IA injections. We show that drug and physiological optimization aimed at rapid drug extraction and sustained retention is necessary to maximize regional deposition after of IA injections.

Flow arrest intra-arterial delivery of small TAT-decorated and neutral micelles to gliomas

The cell-penetrating trans-activator of transcription (TAT) is a cationic peptide derived from human immunodeficiency virus-1. It has been used to facilitate macromolecule delivery to various cell types. This cationic peptide is capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier and therefore might be useful for enhancing the delivery of drugs that target brain tumors. Here we test the efficiency with which relatively small (20 nm) micelles can be delivered by an intra-arterial route specifically to gliomas. Utilizing the well-established method of flow-arrest intra-arterial injection we compared the degree of brain tumor deposition of cationic TAT-decorated micelles versus neutral micelles. Our in vivo and post-mortem analyses confirm glioma-specific deposition of both TAT-decorated and neutral micelles. Increased tumor deposition conferred by the positive charge on the TAT-decorated micelles was modest. Computational modeling suggested a decreased relevance of particle charge at the small sizes tested but not for larger particles. We conclude that continued optimization of micelles may represent a viable strategy for targeting brain tumors after intra-arterial injection. Particle size and charge are important to consider during the directed development of nanoparticles for intra-arterial delivery to brain tumors.

Advances in drug delivery to high grade gliomas

If cancer is hard to be treated, brain cancer is even more, caused by the inability of many effective drugs given systemically to cross the blood brain and blood tumor barriers and reach adequate concentrations at the tumor sites. Effective delivery of drugs to brain cancer tissues is thus a necessary, albeit not sufficient, condition to effectively target the disease. In order to analyze the current status of research on drug delivery to high grade gliomas (HGG-WHO grades III and IV), the most frequent and aggressive brain cancers, a literature search was conducted in PubMed using the terms: "drug delivery and brain tumor" over the publication year 2015. Currently explored drug delivery techniques for HGG include the convection and permeabilization-enhanced deliveries, drug-releasing depots and Ommaya reservoirs. The efficacy/safety ratio widely varies among these techniques and the success of current efforts to increase this ratio widely varies as well.

Cationizable lipid micelles as vehicles for intraarterial glioma treatment

The relative abundance of anionic lipids on the surface of endothelia and on glioma cells suggests a workable strategy for selective drug delivery by utilizing cationic nanoparticles. Furthermore, the extracellular pH of gliomas is relatively acidic suggesting that tumor selectivity could be further enhanced if nanoparticles can be designed to cationize in such an environment. With these motivating hypotheses the objective of this study was to determine whether nanoparticulate (20 nm) micelles could be designed to improve their deposition within gliomas in an animal model. To test this, we performed intra-arterial injection of micelles labeled with an optically quantifiable dye. We observed significantly greater deposition (end-tissue concentration) of cationizable micelles as compared to non-ionizable micelles in the ipsilateral hemisphere of normal brains. More importantly, we noted enhanced deposition of cationizable as compared to non-ionizable micelles in glioma tissue as judged by semiquantitative fluorescence analysis. Micelles were generally able to penetrate to the core of the gliomas tested. Thus we conclude that cationizable micelles may be constructed as vehicles for facilitating glioma-selective delivery of compounds after intraarterial injection.

Reassessing the Role of Intra-Arterial Drug Delivery for Glioblastoma Multiforme Treatment

Effective treatment for glioblastoma (GBM) will likely require targeted delivery of several specific pharmacological agents simultaneously. Intra-arterial (IA) delivery is one technique for targeting the tumor site with multiple agents. Although IA chemotherapy for glioblastoma (GBM) has been attempted since the 1950s, the predicted benefits remain unproven in clinical practice. This review focuses on innovative approaches to IA drug delivery in treating GBM. Guided by novel in vitro and in vivo optical measurements, newer pharmacokinetic models promise to better define the complex relationship between background cerebral blood flow and drug injection parameters. Advanced optical technologies and tracers, unique nanoparticles designs, new cellular targets, and rational drug formulations are continuously modifying the therapeutic landscape for GBM. Personalized treatment approaches are emerging; however, such tailored approaches will largely depend on effective drug delivery techniques and on the ability to simultaneously deliver multidrug regimens. These new paradigms for tumor-selective drug delivery herald dramatic improvements in the effectiveness of IA chemotherapy for GBM. Therefore, within this context of so-called "precision medicine," the role of IA delivery for GBM is thoroughly reassessed.