Microsurgical removal of craniopharyngioma: endoscopic and transcranial techniques for complication avoidance

Endoscopic and exoscopic surgery for brain tumors

Nerves and blood vessels must be protected during brain tumor surgery, which has traditionally relied on microscopes. In the 2000s, endoscopes and related equipment were developed for neurosurgery. In this review, we aim to outline the role of endoscopes in brain tumor surgery and discuss the emerging use of exoscopes. The primary use of endoscopes in brain tumor surgery is in endoscopic endonasal surgery for pituitary tumors. By using the space within the sphenoid sinus, surgeons can insert an endoscope and instruments such as forceps or scissors through the nose to access and remove the tumor. Compared to microscopes, endoscopes can get closer to tumors, nerves, and blood vessels. They enable wide-angle observation of the skull base, making them valuable for skull base tumors as well as pituitary tumors. Endoscopes are also used in cases where a brain tumor is associated with hydrocephalus, allowing surgeons to correct obstructive hydrocephalus and perform tumor biopsies simultaneously. Exoscopy, a newer technique introduced in recent years, involves surgeons wearing special glasses and removing the tumor while viewing a three-dimensional monitor. This approach reduces surgeon fatigue and allows for more natural positioning during lengthy brain tumor surgeries. Future brain tumor surgeries will likely involve robotic surgery, which is already used for other organs. This is expected to make brain tumor removal safer and more accurate.

The role of endoscopic endonasal salvage surgery in recurrent or residual craniopharyngioma after a transcranial approach: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The management of craniopharyngiomas is challenging due to their high rate of recurrence following resection. Excision of recurrent tumors poses further surgical challenges due to loss of arachnoidal planes and adherence to anatomical structures. The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) offers a favorable alternative to transcranial approaches for primary craniopharyngiomas. However, the safety and efficacy of EEA for recurrent tumors, specifically after a prior transcranial approach, needs further investigation.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review using PubMed to develop a database of cases of recurrent craniopharyngiomas previously treated with a transcranial approach.

RESULTS

Fifteen articles were included in this review with a total of 75 cases. There were 50 males and 25 females with a mean age of 38 years (range 2-80). One prior transcranial surgery was done in 80.0% of cases, while 8.0% had two and 12.0% had more than two prior surgeries. Radiotherapy after transcranial resection was given in 18 cases (24.0%). Following EEA, vision improved in 60.0% of cases, and vision worsened in 8.6% of the cases. Of cases, 64.4% had pre-existing anterior hypopituitarism, and 43.8% had diabetes insipidus prior to EEA. New anterior hypopituitarism and diabetes insipidus developed in 24.6% and 21.9% of cases, respectively following EEA. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 64.0%, subtotal resection in 32.0%, and partial resection in 4.0% revision EEA cases. GTR rate was higher in cases with no prior radiotherapy compared to cases with prior radiotherapy (72.0% vs 39.0%, p = 0.0372). The recurrence rate was 17.5% overall but was significantly lower at 10.0% following GTR (p = 0.0019). The average follow-up length was 41.2 months (range, 1-182 months).

CONCLUSION

The EEA can be utilized for resection of recurrent or residual craniopharyngiomas previously managed by a transcranial approach.

Surgical Treatment of Craniopharyngiomas in Adults: Comparison between Primary Surgery and Surgery for Recurrence

OBJECTIVE

Few studies have investigated the differences in outcomes between primary and repeat surgery for a craniopharyngioma in adults. As a result, a treatment concept for adult patients with a craniopharyngioma has not yet been established. The present study aimed to retrospectively analyze adult patients with craniopharyngioma to compare surgical outcomes between primary surgery and surgery for recurrence.

METHODS

The demographic and clinical data of 68 adult patients with craniopharyngioma who had primary surgery (n=50) or surgery for recurrence (n=18) were retrospectively analyzed. In addition, the patients were followed up for an average of 38.6 months (range: 1-133 months).

RESULTS

The cohorts of patients undergoing primary surgery or repeat surgery did not differ preoperatively in terms of demographic data, or radiological tumor features. However, patients with recurrent craniopharyngioma had significantly more pituitary hormone deficits and hypothalamo-pituitary disorders before surgery compared with patients with newly diagnosed craniopharyngioma. The success rate of complete resection in primary surgery was 53.2%. Even after repeat surgery, a satisfactory rate of complete resection of 35.7% was achieved. Operative morbidity was increased neither in patients with repeat surgery compared with those with primary surgery (postoperative bleeding P=0.560; meningitis P=1.000; CSF leak P=0.666; visual disturbance P=0.717) nor in patients with complete resection compared with those with partial resection. We found no difference in recurrence-free survival between initial surgery and repeat surgery (P=0.733). The recurrence rate was significantly lower after complete resection (6.9%) than after partial resection (47.8%; P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Attempting complete resection is justified for not only those with newly diagnosed craniopharyngioma but also for those with recurrent craniopharyngioma. However, the surgeon must settle for less than total resection if postoperative morbidity is anticipated.

Comparison between extended transsphenoidal and transcranial surgery for craniopharyngioma: focus on hypothalamic function and obesity

PURPOSE

Patients suffering from craniopharyngiomas currently have good survival rates, but long-term sequelae, such as development of obesity, worsen their quality of life. Optimal treatment is still controversial and changed during the decades, becoming less aggressive. Transcranial (TC) surgery was the first approach to be used, followed by extended transsphenoidal (eTNS) access. This study aims to compare the two approaches in terms of risk of hypothalamic damage leading to obesity.

METHODS

This is a monocentric retrospective analysis of post-puberal patients treated for primary craniopharyngioma. Postoperative obesity and percentual postsurgical BMI variation were considered proxy for hypothalamic function and used to fit regression models with basal BMI, type of surgery, tumor volume and hypothalamic involvement (anterior vs. anteroposterior).

RESULTS

No difference in radicality was observed between the two approaches; eTNS was more effective in ameliorating visual function but was significantly associated with CSF leaks. The TC approach was associated with a higher incidence of diabetes insipidus. Regression analysis showed only tumor volume and basal BMI resulted as independent predictors for both postoperative obesity (respectively, OR 1.15, P = 0.041, and OR 1.57, P < 0.001) and percentual BMI variation (respectively, + 0.92%, P = 0.005, and - 1.49%, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Larger lesions portend a higher risk to develop postoperative obesity, independently of hypothalamic involvement. Interestingly, basal BMI is independent of lesional volume and is associated with postoperative obesity, but lesser postoperative BMI variation. The surgical approach does not influence the obesity risk. However, eTNS proves valid in managing large tumors with important hypothalamic invasion.

Aggressive resection of craniopharyngioma achieved by drilling the tuberculum sellae/planum sphenoidale using a frontal basal interhemispheric approach: A review of 55 cases

OBJECTIVE

The frontal basal interhemispheric approach (FBIA) is preferable for resection of craniopharyngioma (CP), achieving desirable total resection rates in early reports of lesions located in the suprasellar region to the third ventricle. For tumours that have created a larger obstruction of the tuberculum sellae and planum sphenoidale, aggressive resection in the intrasellar region and medial wall of the cavernous sinus is not feasible compared to improving tumour visualization by drilling the tuberculum sellae and planum sphenoidale. In a report of drilling the sellar tuberculum and sphenoid planum, drilling allowed the direct visualization of tumours invading the intrasellar region and medial wall of the cavernous sinus. Reconstructing the opening of the sellar-sphenoid cavity is achieved by microsuturing a piece of the pericranium/dura around the dural edge of the defective dura of the open sphenoid sinus and sellar cavity to prevent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The FBIA with drilling of the tuberculum sellae and planum sphenoidale was performed to remove the tumours that invaded the intrasellar region and cavernous sinus in 55 patients from January 2014 to October 2019 at our institution. The pre- and postoperative pituitary hormone levels and vision were evaluated as effective standards after surgery and compared using paired t-tests. The different rates of CSF leakage between the packing and microsuture groups were compared by χ² test, p < 0.05.

RESULTS

In all patients with a mean 37-month follow-up (range, 3-2 months), 43 (78.2%) patients returned to their normal life or school independently, 7 (12.7%) patients were able to perform normal activities with minor complaints or effort, and 4 (7.3%) patients could care for themselves or only required occasional assistance. One (1.8%) death occurred, attributed to CSF leak-related meningitis at 5 months after surgery. Postoperative CSF leakage occurred in eight (19.0%) of 42 patients with packed bone wax or pieces of muscle to the sphenoid sinus. Of 13 patients with a piece of the periosteum/dura microsutured around the defective dura of the sellar region and open sphenoid sinus, one (7.7%) of 13 patients experienced CSF leakage in the perioperative period. With statistical analysis, there was a potential risk for postoperative CSF leakage in the bone wax and muscle piece in the open sphenoid sinus, whereas microsuture manoeuvres were effective for avoiding the risk of postoperative CSF leakage (χ² = 8.865, p < 0.005). The microsutures closed the open sphenoid sinus such that it was water-tight. Postoperative visual acuity and the visual field were not affected by the increased intrasellar exposure or the open sphenoid sinus achieved by drilling the tuberculum sellae and planum sphenoidale.

CONCLUSION

Tuberculum sellae/planum sphenoidale drilling via FBIA is feasible to enhance the direct visualization of CP resection, which expands the intrasellar region with a direct resection of recurrent tumours in the sellar cavity and adhering to the medial wall of the cavernous sinus. The potential risk of a CSF leakage seemed to be mitigated when using water-tight microsutures on a piece of the pericranium/dura around the edge of the defective dura in the sellar region and the open sphenoid sinus cavity.

Surgical management of craniopharyngiomas in adult patients: a systematic review and consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Craniopharyngiomas are locally aggressive neuroepithelial tumors infiltrating nearby critical neurovascular structures. The majority of published surgical series deal with childhood-onset craniopharyngiomas, while the optimal surgical management for adult-onset tumors remains unclear. The aim of this paper is to summarize the main principles defining the surgical strategy for the management of craniopharyngiomas in adult patients through an extensive systematic literature review in order to formulate a series of recommendations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The MEDLINE database was systematically reviewed (January 1970-February 2019) to identify pertinent articles dealing with the surgical management of adult-onset craniopharyngiomas. A summary of literature evidence was proposed after discussion within the EANS skull base section.

RESULTS

The EANS task force formulated 13 recommendations and 4 suggestions. Treatment of these patients should be performed in tertiary referral centers. The endonasal approach is presently recommended for midline craniopharyngiomas because of the improved GTR and superior endocrinological and visual outcomes. The rate of CSF leak has strongly diminished with the use of the multilayer reconstruction technique. Transcranial approaches are recommended for tumors presenting lateral extensions or purely intraventricular. Independent of the technique, a maximal but hypothalamic-sparing resection should be performed to limit the occurrence of postoperative hypothalamic syndromes and metabolic complications. Similar principles should also be applied for tumor recurrences. Radiotherapy or intracystic agents are alternative treatments when no further surgery is possible. A multidisciplinary long-term follow-up is necessary.

Endoscopic endonasal surgery outcomes for pediatric craniopharyngioma: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to systematically review the outcomes of endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) for pediatric craniopharyngiomas so as to assess its safety and efficacy.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed using the PubMed and MEDLINE databases for studies published between 1986 and 2019. All studies assessing outcomes following EES for pediatric craniopharyngiomas were included.

RESULTS

Of the total 48 articles identified in the original literature search, 13 studies were ultimately selected. This includes comparative studies with other surgical approaches, retrospective cohort studies, and case series.

CONCLUSIONS

EES for pediatric craniopharyngiomas is a safe and efficacious alternative to other surgical approaches. Achieving gross-total resection with minimal complications is feasible with EES and is comparable, if not superior in some cases, to traditional means of resection. Ideally, a randomized controlled trial might be implemented in the future to further elucidate the effectiveness of EES for resection of craniopharyngiomas.

Lessons learned in the evolution of endoscopic skull base surgery

OBJECTIVEEndoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) is a relatively recent addition to the neurosurgical armamentarium. As with many new approaches, there has been significant controversy regarding its value compared with more traditional approaches to ventral skull base pathology. Although early enthusiasm for new approaches that appear less invasive is usually high, these new techniques require rigorous study to ensure that widespread implementation is in the best interest of patients.METHODSThe authors compared surgical results for ESBS with transcranial surgery (TCS) for several different pathologies over two different time periods (prior to 2012 and 2012-2017) to see how results have evolved over time. Pathologies examined were craniopharyngioma, anterior skull base meningioma, esthesioneuroblastoma, chordoma, and chondrosarcoma.RESULTSESBS offers clear advantages over TCS for most craniopharyngiomas and chordomas. For well-selected cases of planum sphenoidale and tuberculum sellae meningiomas, ESBS has similar rates of resection with higher rates of visual improvement, and more recent results with lower CSF leaks make the complication rates similar between the two approaches. TCS offers a higher rate of resection with fewer complications for olfactory groove meningiomas. ESBS is preferred for lower-grade esthesioneuroblastomas, but higher-grade tumors often still require a craniofacial approach. There are few data on chondrosarcomas, but early results show that ESBS appears to offer clear advantages for minimizing morbidity with similar rates of resection, as long as surgeons are familiar with more complex inferolateral approaches.CONCLUSIONSESBS is maturing into a well-established approach that is clearly in the patients' best interest when applied by experienced surgeons for appropriate pathology. Ongoing critical reevaluation of outcomes is essential for ensuring optimal results.

Microsurgical treatment of craniopharyngioma: Experiences on 183 consecutive patients

This study aimed to summarize the clinical experiences and postoperative effects of microsurgical approaches for craniopharyngioma.A total of 183 craniopharyngioma patients who underwent microsurgical treatment since March 2009 to March 2015 in our hospital were included in current research. Surgical approaches were selected based on preoperative evaluations, including tumor locations, sizes, and growth patterns. Active measurements to manage water-electrolyte disorder and insipidus were taken for postoperative treatments. During the follow-up, patients were monitored for residual or recurrent tumor by postoperative contrast MRI scans done 1 to 3 months after surgery.The used surgical approaches were as follows: frontopterional approach (76 cases), anterior interhemispheric approach (58 cases), transcallosal approach (10 cases), transsphenoidal approach (15 cases), unilateral subfrontal approach (15 cases), and combined approaches (9 cases). Around 124 cases (72.7%) received total tumor resection, 37 patients (20.2%) underwent subtotal resection, and 13 patients (7.1%) underwent partial removal. No significant difference was found on the postoperative complications among the different microsurgical approaches (all, P > .05). A total of 111 cases had an intact pituitary stalk preservation and 26 cases had partially preserved stalks during surgery. Visual improvement was achieved in 54 patients and visual deterioration occurred in 22 cases. Postoperative insipidus appeared in 114 cases and water-electrolyte disorder occurred in 99 cases. The postsurgical follow-up ranged from 3 to 69 months with a mean duration of 27.3 months and 23 patients suffered recurrence.Based on careful preoperative evaluation, microsurgical treatments may be safe and effective approach to improve postoperative outcomes of craniopharyngioma patients.

The supraorbital eyebrow approach for removal of craniopharyngioma in children: a case series

OBJECTIVE

Craniopharyngiomas can be a surgical challenge for the pediatric neurosurgeon. Ideally, total removal must be achieved. However, the need to reduce surgical morbidity and preserve quality of life has led to a number of neurosurgical approaches in order to attain this goal. The aim of this article is to present an alternative surgical approach to these lesions and to provide the rationale for this technique.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Medical charts and operative records of eight pediatric patients harboring craniopharyngiomas who underwent surgical treatment using a supraorbital eyebrow approach (SOA) were reviewed from 2014 to 2016. Only patients younger than 18 years with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were included in this study. Using pre-operative magnetic resonance (MRI) scans, tumors were classified according to their degree of hypothalamic involvement. The surgical technique is also described in detail.

RESULTS

The study group included six males and two females with a mean age of 10 years (range, 2-16 years). The SOA was used successfully in elective surgery of eight craniopharyngiomas. The hypothalamus was displaced by the tumor in three patients and severely involved in five patients. Subtotal resection was undertaken in six patients, whereas gross-total resection was achieved in two. Endoscopic assistance was used after standard microscopic visualization in two out of eight cases. Cosmetic outcomes were excellent, and the complication rate related to the surgical procedure was quite low, apart from diabetes insipidus (which occurred in three out of the eight patients). In one patient, a large subdural collection needed surgery for evacuation. Mean follow-up was 23.2 months (range, 12-36 months). Additionally, no CSF leak or wound infection was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The supraorbital eyebrow approach is an alternative route to operate on craniopharyngiomas in properly selected cases of all pediatric age ranges, from infants to teenagers. There is sufficient working space for the endoscope and all instruments, allowing for endoscopic assistance and bimanual surgical technique. Cosmetic results are excellent, and complications related to the approach are minimal.

Is the chiasm-pituitary corridor size important for achieving gross-total resection during endonasal endoscopic resection of craniopharyngiomas?

OBJECTIVE Craniopharyngiomas arise from the pituitary stalk, and in adults they are generally located posterior to the chiasm extending up into the third ventricle. The extended endonasal approach (EEA) can provide an ideal corridor between the bottom of the optic chiasm and the top of the pituitary gland (chiasm-pituitary corridor [CPC]) for their removal. A narrow CPC in patients with a prefixed chiasm and a large tumor extending up and behind the chiasm has been considered a contraindication to EEA, with a high risk of visual deterioration and subtotal resection. METHODS A database of all patients treated in the authors' center (Weill Cornell Medical College, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital) between July 2004 and August 2016 was reviewed. Patients with craniopharyngiomas who underwent EEA with the goal of gross-total resection (GTR) were included in the study. Patients with postfixed chiasm or limited available preoperative imaging were excluded. Using preoperative contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sagittal midline MR images, the authors calculated the CPC as well as the distance from the chiasm to the top of the tumor (CTOT). From these numbers, they calculated a ratio of the CPC to the CTOT as a measure of difficulty in removing the tumors through the EEA and called this ratio the corridor index (CI). The relationship between the CI and the ability to achieve GTR and visual outcome were measured. RESULTS Thirty-four patients were included in the study. The mean CPC was 10.1 mm (range 5.2-19.1 mm). The mean CTOT was 12.8 mm (range 0-28.3 mm). The median CI was 0.8; the CI ranged from 0.4 to infinity (for tumors with a CTOT of 0). Thirty-two patients had GTR (94.1%) and 2 had subtotal resection. The CPC value had no relationship with our ability to achieve GTR and no effect on visual or endocrine outcome. CONCLUSIONS EEA for craniopharyngioma is generally considered the first-line surgical approach. Although a narrow corridor between the top of the pituitary gland and the bottom of the chiasm may seem to be a relative contraindication to surgery for larger tumors, the authors' data do not bear this out. EEA appears to be a successful technique for the majority of midline craniopharyngiomas.

Frontal burr hole approach for neuroendoscopic resection of craniopharyngioma with the NICO Myriad device: report of two cases

OBJECTIVE

Craniopharyngiomas are challenging tumors to resect due to their deep location and proximity to vital structures. The perceived benefit of gross total resection may be tempered by the possibility of permanent disability. Minimally invasive techniques may reduce surgical morbidity while still allowing effective resection. The authors describe their initial experience with a neuroendoscopic transcortical, transventricular approach to two craniopharyngiomas. The surgeries were performed through a right frontal burr hole using the NICO Myriad, a side-cutting, aspiration device that fits through the working channel of a standard neuroendoscope.

METHODS

The imaging and medical records of two children (a 5-year-old male and a 9-year-old female) undergoing endoscopic resection of a craniopharyngioma with this technique were reviewed. Outcomes, results, and complications were noted.

RESULTS

A gross total resection was achieved in both patients. The operative time was 180 and 143 min, respectively. The estimated blood loss was 20 and 50 cm³, respectively. Both patients required a cerebrospinal fluid shunt. There were no surgical complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The NICO Myriad is an effective tool that allows a safe minimally invasive endoscopic resection of craniopharyngiomas in patients with amenable anatomy. Surgeons with experience in neuroendoscopy may be able to achieve a gross total resection of these challenging tumors through a minimally invasive burr hole approach.