Optimizing bevacizumab dosing in glioblastoma: less is more

Bevacizumab exerts dose-dependent risk for intracranial hemorrhage in patients with malignant gliomas

PURPOSE

Bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody, has become a mainstay therapeutic in the management of malignant glioma. It is unknown if the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), a major complication associated with bevacizumab use, is dose-dependent.

METHODS

This was a single institution retrospective analysis of patients treated with bevacizumab for the management of gliomas between 2009 and 2022. Incidence rates of ICH between patients receiving low-dose (< 5 mg/kg/week) and conventional-dose (5 mg/kg/week) bevacizumab regimens were compared via competing risk analysis over time. We evaluated post-progression survival (PPS) as a secondary outcome using multivariate Cox regression.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-three patients were identified (low-dose group, n = 51, conventional-dose group, n = 122) for inclusion in our analysis. Cumulative incidence rates of all cases of ICH and clinically symptomatic cases of ICH were higher in the conventional-dose (17.2% for all cases, 13.7% for symptomatic) relative to the low-dose group (3.9% for all cases, 2.0% for symptomatic); p-value 0.0296 for all cases, p-value 0.0274 for symptomatic cases. On multivariate Fine-Gray regression, conventional-dose bevacizumab therapy remained significantly associated with increased risk for symptomatic ICH (SHR 8.0560; p-value 0.0442). No difference in PPS was observed between the low-dose versus conventional-dose groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional-dose bevacizumab therapy (5 mg/kg/week) is associated with increased incidence of ICH in patients with malignant glioma compared to lower dose bevacizumab (< 5 mg/kg/week) in this single center retrospective cohort. No difference in PPS was observed between the low-dose versus conventional-dose groups.

The efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy followed by bevacizumab and temozolomide in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma: a case report

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive malignant brain tumor among adults. Despite advancements in multimodality therapy for GBM, the overall prognosis remains poor, with an extremely high risk of recurrence. Currently, there is no established consensus on the optimal treatment option for recurrent GBM, which may include reoperation, reirradiation, chemotherapy, or a combination of the above. Bevacizumab is considered a first-line treatment option for recurrent GBM, as is temozolomide. However, in recurrent GBM, it is necessary to balance the risks and benefits of reirradiation in combination with bevacizumab and temozolomide. Herein, we report the case of a patient with recurrent GBM after standard treatment who benefited from stereotactic radiotherapy followed by bevacizumab and temozolomide maintenance therapy. Following 16 months of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), the patient was diagnosed with recurrent GBM by a 3-T contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The addition of localized radiotherapy to the ongoing treatment regimen of bevacizumab, in combination with temozolomide therapy, prolonged the patient's disease-free survival to over 2 years, achieving a significant long-term outcome, with no notable adverse effects observed. This clinical case may provide a promising new option for patients with recurrent GBM.

The Effects of Drug Exposure and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms on Aaptinib-Induced Severe Toxicities in Solid Tumors

To investigate the value of drug exposure and host germline genetic factors in predicting apatinib (APA)-related toxicities.

METHOD

In this prospective study, plasma APA concentrations were quantified using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, and 57 germline mutations were genotyped in 126 advanced solid tumor patients receiving 250 mg daily APA, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor II inhibitor. The correlation between drug exposure, genetic factors, and the toxicity profile was analyzed.

RESULTS

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was more prone to APA-related toxicities and plasma concentrations of APA, and its main metabolite M1-1 could be associated with high-grade adverse events (AEs) (P < 0.01; M1-1, P < 0.01) and high-grade antiangiogenetic toxicities (APA, P = 0.034; P < 0.05), including hypertension, proteinuria, and hand-foot syndrome, in the subgroup of NSCLC. Besides, CYP2C9 rs34532201 TT carriers tended to have higher levels of APA (P < 0.001) and M1-1 (P < 0.01), whereas CYP2C9 rs1936968 GG carriers were predisposed to higher levels of M1-1 (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Plasma APA and M1-1 exposures were able to predict severe AEs in NSCLC patients. Dose optimization and drug exposure monitoring might need consideration in NSCLC patients with CYP2C9 rs34532201 TT and rs1936968 GG.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

Apatinib is an anti-VEGFR2 inhibitor for the treatment of multiple cancers. Though substantial in response, apatinib-induced toxicity has been a critical issue that is worth clinical surveillance. Few data on the role of drug exposure and genetic factors in apatinib-induced toxicity are available. Our study demonstrated a distinct drug-exposure relationship in NSCLC but not other tumors and provided invaluable evidence of drug exposure levels and single nucleotide polymorphisms as predictive biomarkers in apatinib-induced severe toxicities.

Polymorphism at codon 31 of CDKN1A (p21) as a predictive factor for bevacizumab therapy in glioblastoma multiforme

Glioblastoma (GBM), a prevalent and malignant brain tumor, poses a challenge in surgical resection due to its invasive nature within the brain parenchyma. CDKN1A (p21, Waf-1), a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, plays a pivotal role in regulating cell growth arrest, terminal differentiation, and apoptosis. The existence of natural variants of CDKN1A has been associated with specific cancer types. In this retrospective study, our objective was to identify polymorphic variants of CDKN1A, specifically c.93C > A (codon 31 Ser31Arg), and investigate its potential impact within the scope of bevacizumab therapy for glioblastoma multiforme. This study involved a cohort of 139 unrelated adult Chinese GBM patients in Taiwan. Genomic DNA extracted from tumor samples was utilized for genotyping using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) restriction fragment length polymorphism method (PCR-RFLP analysis). Through unconditional logistic regression analysis, odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Our findings unveiled that among these GBM patients, the distribution of codon 31 polymorphisms was as follows: 23.02% were Serine homozygotes (Ser/Ser), 27.34% were Arginine homozygotes (Arg/Arg), and 49.64% were Serine/Arginine heterozygotes (Ser/Arg). While CDKN1A c.93C > A polymorphisms did not exhibit a direct association with overall survival in GBM patients, noteworthy survival benefits emerged among individuals with Arg/Arg and Arg/Ser genotypes who received combined concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and bevacizumab treatment compared to those who underwent CCRT alone. Our findings indicate a significant involvement of the CDKN1A c.93C > A polymorphism in the development and onset of GBM, offering potential implications for the early prognostication of bevacizumab therapy outcomes.

Dose-dependent efficacy of bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab (BEV), at a standard dose of 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks is associated with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) but no improvement in overall survival (OS) in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). Few studies have examined the potential dose-dependent efficacy of BEV. In Ontario, reimbursement for the costs of BEV varies, and as a result, our practice began to routinely use lower dose regimens. The main aim of this study was to ensure that there was no harm to patients who received the low dose protocol.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective study of patients given BEV for rGBM between 2015 and 2020 was performed. Clinical and treatment data including BEV dose regimen [SD (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) vs. LD (5 mg/kg every 2-3 weeks or 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks)] received at the time of rGBM diagnosis were captured. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) on BEV were compared using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. Log-rank test was used to compare potential predictive factors. Cox regression model was performed for multivariable analysis of OS and PFS.

RESULTS

A total of 96 patients were included with a median follow-up duration of 6.84 months (range 1.12-50.63 months) from the date of the first infusion. The LD group consisted of 55 of the 96 patients. By virtue of funding mechanisms for BEV, the median age in the LD group was significantly higher (62 vs. 54 years p = 0.009). There was no difference in MGMT status between the two groups (p = 0.60). The LD group had prolonged median PFS (5.89 months versus 3.22 months; p = 0.0112) and OS (10.23 months versus 6.28 months; p = 0.0010). Multivariable analysis including the dose of BEV, the extent of resection, gender, and age revealed that standard dose of BEV, subtotal resection, and female sex were associated with worse overall survival. Nine patients in the SD group vs. 18 patients in the LD group reported an adverse event related to BEV.

CONCLUSION

For patients with recurrent GBM, we found that a low dose regimen of BEV was associated with prolonged OS and PFS compared to the standard dose regimen. Lower dose schedules may be a better and more cost-effective option for patients with rGBM. Lower costs might provide more equitable access to this very important palliative drug.

A systematic review of targeted therapy for vestibular schwannoma in patients with NF2-related schwannomatosis

Background

One of the hallmarks of NF2-related Schwannomatosis (NF2-related SWN) is bilateral vestibular schwannomas (VS) that can cause progressive hearing impairment in patients. This systematic review was performed to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of tested targeted agents.

Methods

The systematic search was conducted on PubMed and EMBASE Ovid databases from inception to October 2022, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The incidence of outcomes in studies involving bevacizumab and other targeted therapies was extracted. The bevacizumab results were pooled, and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated.

Results

Sixteen studies (8 prospective and 8 retrospective) testing 6 drugs were selected out of 721 search results. There were 10 studies concerning bevacizumab, with a total of 200 patients. The pooled radiographic response rate (RR) was 38% (95% CI: 31 - 45%) and the pooled hearing response rate (HR) was 45% (95% CI: 36 - 54%). The most frequent bevacizumab-related toxicities were hypertension and menorrhagia. Of other targeted therapies showing activity, lapatinib had a RR of 6% and a HR of 31%. A VEGFR vaccine showed RR in 29% and HR in 40% of patients. Both agents had a manageable safety profile.

Conclusions

Bevacizumab, in comparison to other targeted agents, showed the highest efficacy. Lower dosage of bevacizumab shows comparable efficacy and may reduce toxicity. Other targeted agents, administered alone or as combination therapy, have the potential to improve outcomes for VS in patients with NF2-related SWN, but future clinical studies are needed.

Single-shot bevacizumab for cerebral radiation injury

Background

Cerebral radiation injury, including subacute radiation reactions and later stage radiation necrosis, is a severe side effect of brain tumor radiotherapy. A protocol of four infusions of the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab has been shown to be a highly effective treatment. However, bevacizumab is costly and can cause severe complications including thrombosis, bleeding and gastrointestinal perforations.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients treated in our clinic for cerebral radiation injury who received only a singular treatment with bevacizumab. Single-shot was defined as a singular administration of bevacizumab without a second administration during an interval of at least 6 weeks.

Results

We identified 11 patients who had received a singular administration of bevacizumab to treat cerebral radiation injury. Prior radiation had been administered to treat gliomas (ten patients) or breast cancer brain metastases (one patient). 9 of 10 patients with available MRIs showed a marked reduction of edema at first follow-up. Discontinuation of Dexamethasone was possible in 6 patients and a significant dose reduction could be achieved in all other patients. One patient developed pulmonary artery embolism 2 months after bevacizumab administration. The median time to treatment failure of any cause was 3 months.

Conclusions

Single-shot bevacizumab therefore has meaningful activity in cerebral radiation injury, but durable control is rarely achieved. In patients where a complete protocol of four infusions with bevacizumab is not feasible due to medical contraindications or lack of reimbursement, single-shot bevacizumab treatment may be considered.

Update on Chemotherapeutic Approaches and Management of Bevacizumab Usage for Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma, the most common primary brain tumor in adults, has one of the most dismal prognoses in cancer. In 2009, bevacizumab was approved for recurrent glioblastoma in the USA. To evaluate the clinical impact of bevacizumab as a first-line drug for glioblastoma, two randomized clinical trials, AVAglio and RTOG 0825, were performed. Bevacizumab was found to improve progression-free survival (PFS) and was reported to be beneficial for maintaining patient performance status as an initial treatment. These outcomes led to bevacizumab approval in Japan in 2013 as an insurance-covered first-line drug for glioblastoma concurrently with its second-line application. However, prolongation of overall survival was not evinced in these clinical trials; hence, the clinical benefit of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastomas remains controversial. A recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of bevacizumab combined with temozolomide in recurrent glioblastoma also showed an effect only on PFS, and the benefit of bevacizumab even for recurrent glioblastoma is controversial. Here, we discuss the clinical impact of bevacizumab for glioblastoma treatment by reviewing previous clinical trials and real-world evidence by focusing on Japanese experiences. Moreover, the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab are summarized, and we provide suggestions for updating the approaches and management of bevacizumab.

Reduced-dose bevacizumab vs. standard-dose bevacizumab in recurrent high-grade glioma: Which one is better? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Based on the effective radiological responses, bevacizumab (BEV) has been widely used in the treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma. Although the current standard dose is 5 mg/kg/week, the optimal dosage of BEV is controversial, as few dose-response studies have been performed in recent years. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to explore the value of reduced-dose bevacizumab versus standard-dose bevacizumab in recurrent high-grade glioma treatment.

METHODS

Three major electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library) were searched for eligible documents published before February 2020. Literature on low-dose bevacizumab versus conventional dose in progressive high-grade glioma was included, and the endpoints of eligible researches should be progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). All available data were collected and then analyzed with Stata software.

RESULTS

Four cohort studies were evaluated, including 552 patients (reduced-dose BEV group: 257, standard-dose BEV group: 295). Low dose BEV seems to slightly improve survival compared to conventional dose as HR < 1 indicates a protective effect, but no significant differences in OS (HR 0.77; 95 % CI 0.53-1.10; P = 0.151) and PFS (HR 0.66; 95 % CI 0.37-1.20; P = 0.175) were found between the two groups in this study.

CONCLUSION

Reduced-dose bevacizumab schedule resulted in similar OS and PFS to standard-dose bevacizumab in recurrent high-grade glioma, with less side effects and less cost of treatment. Therefore, low-dose bevacizumab represents a promising therapeutic option for recurrent high-grade glioma patients. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm our results.

Bevacizumab dose adjustment to improve clinical outcomes of glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most aggressive and vascularized brain tumors in adults, with a median survival of 20.9 months. In newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM, bevacizumab demonstrated an increase in progression-free survival, but not in overall survival.

METHODS

We conducted an in silico analysis of VEGF expression, in a cohort of 1082 glioma patients. Then, to determine whether appropriate bevacizumab dose adjustment could increase the anti-angiogenic response, we used in vitro and in vivo GBM models. Additionally, we analyzed VEGFA expression in tissue, serum, and plasma in a cohort of GBM patients before and during bevacizumab treatment.

RESULTS

We identified that 20% of primary GBM did not express VEGFA suggesting that these patients would probably not respond to bevacizumab therapy as we proved in vitro and in vivo. We found that a specific dose of bevacizumab calculated based on VEGFA expression levels increases the response to treatment in cell culture and serum samples from mice bearing GBM tumors. Additionally, in a cohort of GBM patients, we observed a correlation of VEGFA levels in serum, but not in plasma, with bevacizumab treatment performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that bevacizumab dose adjustment could improve clinical outcomes in Glioblastoma treatment.

T-Cell based therapies for overcoming neuroanatomical and immunosuppressive challenges within the glioma microenvironment

Glioblastoma remains as the most common and aggressive primary adult brain tumor to date. Within the last decade, cancer immunotherapy surfaced as a broadly successful therapeutic approach for a variety of cancers. However, due to the neuroanatomical and immunosuppressive nature of malignant gliomas, conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatments garner limited efficacy in patients with these tumors. The intricate structure of the blood brain barrier restricts immune accessibility into the tumor microenvironment, and malignant gliomas can activate various adaptive responses to subvert anticancer immune responses and reinstate an immunosuppressive milieu. Yet, evidence of lymphocyte infiltration within the brain and recent advancements made in cell engineering technologies implicate the vast potential in the future of neuro-oncological immunotherapy. Previous immunotherapy platforms have paved way to improved modalities, which includes but is not limited to personalized vaccines and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. This review will cover the various neuroanatomical and immunosuppressive features of central nervous system tumors and highlight the innovations made in T-cell based therapies to overcome the challenges presented by the glioblastoma microenvironment.

Similar overall survival with reduced vs. standard dose bevacizumab monotherapy in progressive glioblastoma

INTRODUCTION

Bevacizumab has demonstrated activity in glioblastoma (GBM), but the true benefits and optimal dose-schedule are debated. A lower dose-schedule than standard-dose bevacizumab (10 mg/kg 2-weekly) might offer similar benefits with lower costs. At our Institution, patients are randomly assigned at time of primary diagnosis to Neuro-Oncologists, who have varying practices in terms of bevacizumab dose-schedule upon progression.

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis we examined overall survival (OS), measured from first administered bevacizumab dose until death, according to dose-schedule. Patients with de novo WHO Grade IV GBM who received standard- or reduced-dose (5 mg/kg 2-weekly) bevacizumab were included. MGMT methylation status and time from diagnosis to bevacizumab start were examined as prognostic variables. Clinical benefit and a comparative cost analysis were assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 1127 bevacizumab doses were administered to 118 patients [Median: 7, Range: 1-44]. Median OS (mOS) was 5.8 months. 69 (59%) patients received standard-dose bevacizumab (mOS: 5.97 months) and 49 patients received reduced-dose (mOS: 5.7 months). No statistically significant difference in OS between dosing schedule was seen (HR: 1.11, P-value: .584). Patients with MGMT methylated tumors (43%) had improved OS compared to those with unmethylated tumors; 7.03 vs 4.97 months (HR: 0.61, P-value: .027). If all patients were treated with reduced-dose bevacizumab, an estimated €2.4M cost reduction would be observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, reduced-dose bevacizumab schedule resulted in similar OS to standard-dose bevacizumab monotherapy with substantial cost savings. MGMT methylation appears to convey a survival benefit in the setting of bevacizumab treatment for progressive GBM.

Long-term survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab: a multicentric retrospective study

PURPOSE

Recurrence of glioblastoma (GB) occurs in most patients after standard concomitant temozolomide-based radiochemotherapy (CTRC). Bevacizumab (BV), an anti-VEGF antibody, has an effect on progression-free survival (PFS) but not on overall survival (OS). However, a small part of the patients experience a survival, longer than expected. This retrospective study aims to characterize long responder (LR) patients treated with BV for a first or second GBM recurrence.

METHODS

Medical records from patients (814) who received BV for a first or second recurrence of primary glioblastoma between September 2010 and September 2015, and initially treated by CTRC were analyzed. Patients, who had at least a stable disease according to RANO criteria at 12 months from the start of BV, were included. Patients who had, a secondary GB, or received BV in neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting were excluded.

RESULTS

We focused on 65 LR patients without progression 12 months after the first injection of BV (8%). Median PFS was 21.7 months [95% CI (19.3; 27.2)] and median OS was 31.1 months [95% CI (24.3; 37.5)] from the start of BV. No prognostic factor was associated with OS in multivariate analysis. Karnofsky performance status, neurological status and corticosteroid dose were stable at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results highlight that among patients receiving bevacizumab in first or second recurrence, one patient out of twelve could be classified as LR. A median OS of 31.1 months from the start of BV could be expected in this subpopulation. These findings reinforce the potential benefit of the use of BV in the situation of recurrence. 256 words.

Current State of Immunotherapy for Treatment of Glioblastoma

OPINION STATEMENT

At this time, there are no FDA-approved immune therapies for glioblastoma (GBM) despite many unique therapies currently in clinical trials. GBM is a highly immunosuppressive tumor and there are limitations to a safe immune response in the central nervous system. To date, there have been several failures of phase 3 immune therapy clinical trials in GBM. These trials have targeted single components of an antitumor immune response. Learning from these failures, the future of immunotherapy for GBM appears most hopeful for combination of immune therapies to overcome the profound immunosuppression of this disease. Understanding biomarkers for appropriate patient selection as well as tumor progression are necessary for implementation of immunotherapy for GBM.