Systemic relapses of primary CNS lymphomas (PCNSL): a LOC network study

Primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs) classically remain confined within the CNS throughout their evolution for unknown reasons. Our objective was to analyse the rare extracerebral relapses of PCNSL in a nationwide population-based study. We retrospectively selected PCNSL patients who experienced extracerebral relapse during their follow-up from the French LOC database. Of the 1968 PCNSL included in the database from 2011, 30 (1.5%, median age 71 years, median KPS 70) presented an extracerebral relapse, either pure (n = 20) or mixed (both extracerebral and in the CNS) (n = 10), with a histological confirmation in 20 cases. The median delay between initial diagnosis and systemic relapse was 15.5 months [2-121 months]. We found visceral (n = 23, 77%), including testis in 5 (28%) men and breast in 3 (27%) women, lymph node (n = 12, 40%), and peripheral nervous system (PNS) (n = 7, 23%) involvement. Twenty-seven patients were treated with chemotherapy, either with only systemic targets (n = 7) or mixed systemic and CNS targets (n = 20), 4 were consolidated by HCT-ASCT. After systemic relapse, the median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 7 and 12 months, respectively. KPS > 70 and pure systemic relapses were significantly associated with higher OS. Extracerebral PCNSL relapses are rare, mainly extranodal, and frequently involve the testis, breast, and PNS. The prognosis was worse in mixed relapses. Early relapses raise the question of misdiagnosed occult extracerebral lymphoma at diagnostic workup that should systematically include a PET-CT. Paired tumour analysis at diagnosis/relapse would provide a better understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms.

Molecular and clinical diversity in primary central nervous system lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare and distinct entity within diffuse large B-cell lymphoma presenting with variable response rates probably to underlying molecular heterogeneity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To identify and characterize PCNSL heterogeneity and facilitate clinical translation, we carried out a comprehensive multi-omic analysis [whole-exome sequencing, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), methylation sequencing, and clinical features] in a discovery cohort of 147 fresh-frozen (FF) immunocompetent PCNSLs and a validation cohort of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) 93 PCNSLs with RNA-seq and clinico-radiological data.

RESULTS

Consensus clustering of multi-omic data uncovered concordant classification of four robust, non-overlapping, prognostically significant clusters (CS). The CS1 and CS2 groups presented an immune-cold hypermethylated profile but a distinct clinical behavior. The 'immune-hot' CS4 group, enriched with mutations increasing the Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) and nuclear factor-κB activity, had the most favorable clinical outcome, while the heterogeneous-immune CS3 group had the worse prognosis probably due to its association with meningeal infiltration and enriched HIST1H1E mutations. CS1 was characterized by high Polycomb repressive complex 2 activity and CDKN2A/B loss leading to higher proliferation activity. Integrated analysis on proposed targets suggests potential use of immune checkpoint inhibitors/JAK1 inhibitors for CS4, cyclin D-Cdk4,6 plus phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors for CS1, lenalidomide/demethylating drugs for CS2, and enhancer of zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit (EZH2) inhibitors for CS3. We developed an algorithm to identify the PCNSL subtypes using RNA-seq data from either FFPE or FF tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

The integration of genome-wide data from multi-omic data revealed four molecular patterns in PCNSL with a distinctive prognostic impact that provides a basis for future clinical stratification and subtype-based targeted interventions.

P14.48 Extracerebral relapses of primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL): a LOC network retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Classically PCNSL remain confined within the CNS throughout their evolution for reasons still unknown (> 80% cerebral relapses). The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of the rare extracerebral relapses of PCNSL.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a multicenter, retrospective study. We included all immunocompetent patients newly diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell PCNSL registered in the national LOC network database since 2010 and followed prospectively, who presented an extracerebral relapse, pure (extracerebral only site) or associated with concomitant CNS relapse (mixed). All had body scan and/or TEP -CT at diagnosis work up.

RESULTS

Of the 1968 PCNSL included in the database, 29 (1.5%) patients presented a systemic relapse [median age 71 years, median KPS 70% at relapse], either pure (n=19) or mixed (n=10), with a histological confirmation in 19 cases (66%). The median delay between initial diagnosis and systemic relapse was 15 months [2–49 months], with 5 very early relapses (<8 months) and 10 late relapses (>21 months). 27 patients had symptoms, 21 related to the location of relapse and 6 with only general symptoms. The localization was thoracic (n=11), abdominal/pelvic (n=14), head/neck (n=6) and limbs (n=9). We found visceral (n=24, 83%), including testis in 5 (28%) men and breast in 3 (27%) women, lymph node (n=12, 41%) and peripheral nervous system (PNS) (n=8, 28%; 4 plexus and 4 extradural roots) involvement. 27 patients were treated with chemotherapy, either with only systemic target (n=8) (R-CHOP alone) or mixed systemic and CNS target (n=19) (R-CHOP-MTX, R-ICE, GEMOX, RDHAC) and consolidated by high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (HCT-ASCT) in 4 cases [median age 55 years, median KPS 80%], with 34% of complete response. After systemic relapse, median progression-free survival was 8 months and overall survival (OS) was 9 months, 15 months for pure systemic and 4.5 months for mixed relapses. KPS>70%, pure systemic relapses and complete response were significantly associated with higher OS in univariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Extracerebral PCNSL relapses are very rare, mainly extranodal and involve a large spectrum of anatomical sites, the most frequent being testis, breast and PNS. Prognosis was worse in case of mixed relapse than in pure systemic relapse that was similar to non PCNSL lymphomas. Very early relapses raise the question of misdiagnosed occult extracerebral lymphoma at diagnostic work up that should include systematically a FDG PET-CT. More studies are needed to refine their treatment and to specify the role of HCT-ASCT. Paired tumor tissues at diagnosis (CNS)/relapse (extracerebral) analysis would provide a better understanding of underlying molecular mechanisms.

OS3.4 Karnofsky and WHO performance scores of brain tumour patients may limit inclusion in protocols though they depend on clinician status

BACKGROUND

Inclusion criteria for oncological protocols often use the Karnofsky performance score (KPS) >=70 or the WHO performance score (PS) 0–2 as a cut-off value. Inclusion of neuro-oncology patients may be hampered, when general condition is preserved, while performance is decreased due to physical handicap. The goal of this study is to compare the KPS and PS assessments according to the status of the clinician.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted through ANOCEF and EANO networks. Clinicians evaluated KPS and PS in 6 clinical situations concerning neuro oncology patients (from youngest and fittest to oldest, crippled with comorbidities).

RESULTS

The rate of PS <70 or PS> 2 increased significantly from case 1 to 6.

Sex or nationality of the clinicians had no impact when adjusting on clinician characteristics. Conversely, speciality (residents/general practitioner vs neurosurgeons vs neurologists vs oncologists), impacted KPS or PS evaluations (p<.0001 and p=0.0046, respectively). Residents or general practitioner estimate KPS much lower than the others specialities. Neurosurgeons estimate PS more severely. Clinicians who were not used to including patients in clinical trials proposed lower KPS scores (p = 0.0008). This tendancy was not shown on PS. Eldest physicians significantly rated more severely than the youngest (p = 0.0459 and p <.0001 for KPS and PS, respectively).

In a multivariate analysis, age and speciality were correlated with KPS and PS rating even if adjusted on cases.

Discordant decision for protocol inclusion (i:e: (KPS) >=70 vs PS 0–2) showed little discrepancy in case 1 (2.3%), while discrepancy increased to respectively 16, 46, 39, 33 and 43% for cases 2 to 6: in nearly all cases, the KPS would have denied access to a trial, while WHO Ps would have allowed

CONCLUSION

Rating of KP and PS is subjective in neuro oncology patients: influenced by speciality, age and inclusion habit (for KPS) of clinicians, PS 0–2 allows usually more inclusion than KPS>=70 in more severely disabled patients. A Neuro oncology specific KPS and/or PS definition is warranted to allow more widely inclusion of patients with exclusive neurologic handicap.

Long-term survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab: a multicentric retrospective study

PURPOSE

Recurrence of glioblastoma (GB) occurs in most patients after standard concomitant temozolomide-based radiochemotherapy (CTRC). Bevacizumab (BV), an anti-VEGF antibody, has an effect on progression-free survival (PFS) but not on overall survival (OS). However, a small part of the patients experience a survival, longer than expected. This retrospective study aims to characterize long responder (LR) patients treated with BV for a first or second GBM recurrence.

METHODS

Medical records from patients (814) who received BV for a first or second recurrence of primary glioblastoma between September 2010 and September 2015, and initially treated by CTRC were analyzed. Patients, who had at least a stable disease according to RANO criteria at 12 months from the start of BV, were included. Patients who had, a secondary GB, or received BV in neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting were excluded.

RESULTS

We focused on 65 LR patients without progression 12 months after the first injection of BV (8%). Median PFS was 21.7 months [95% CI (19.3; 27.2)] and median OS was 31.1 months [95% CI (24.3; 37.5)] from the start of BV. No prognostic factor was associated with OS in multivariate analysis. Karnofsky performance status, neurological status and corticosteroid dose were stable at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results highlight that among patients receiving bevacizumab in first or second recurrence, one patient out of twelve could be classified as LR. A median OS of 31.1 months from the start of BV could be expected in this subpopulation. These findings reinforce the potential benefit of the use of BV in the situation of recurrence. 256 words.

[Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastasis: Benefit of additional whole brain radiotherapy?]

PURPOSE

To study overall survival, risk of neurological death, local recurrence and development of new brain metastasis in patients treated for brain oligometastases with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with CyberKnife^®, according to the association or not with an additional whole brain irradiation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Institutional retrospective study of 102 patients treated for one to three brain metastasis: 76 with exclusive hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and 26 with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and whole brain irradiation. Objectives were assessed and compared between these two groups according to the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox model.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 18.8 months. There were no difference between exclusive hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with whole brain irradiation for overall survival (respective median 21.5 and 20.1 months), risk of neurological death (respectively 9.2% and 15.4% at one year). At one year: the risk of cerebral progressive disease was greater in the group receiving exclusive hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (respectively 43.4% vs. 26.2%, P=0.043), the risk of local recurrence was 25% versus 17.6% (P=0.28) and the development of new brain metastasis was 23.7% versus 11.5% (P=0.27). After salvage treatments, crude local control was similar in the two groups, respectively 78.6% and 73.5%. Whole brain irradiation has been avoided for 72.4% of patients in the group receving exclusive hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Whole brain irradiation improves local control of brain metastatic disease in addition to hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Sparing whole brain irradiation for salvage treatments only does not affect overall survival or risk of neurological death in selected patients with favourable prognosis.

[Supportive care, cognition and quality of life in brain metastases]

Brain metastases impact on the survival of the patients, but on their quality of life as well. The objective of the management of these patients is then double. Currently, due to medical advances, survivals tend to improve, especially for some tumor subtypes. During the course of the disease, different neurological signs and symptoms can be observed according to the location, the number and the volume of the metastase(s). Patients and caregivers are especially worried about the loss of autonomy and cognitive impairments. A permanent dialogue, during the course of the disease, is mandatory, in order to adapt the management to the objectives determined by the patients and the medical team. These objectives may vary according to the objective response rates of the disease to anticancer therapies, according to the impact of the disease and its management in daily living. Anticancer therapies and supportive care must be appreciated according to their impact on the survival, on the preservation of the functional independence and the quality of life of the patient, on their abilities to preserve the neurological status and delay the apparition of new neurological signs and symptoms, and their adverse events. Supportive care, cognition and quality of life should be regularly evaluated and adapted according to the objectives of the management of brain metastases patients. Different approaches are described in this paper.

Randomized phase II trial of irinotecan and bevacizumab as neo-adjuvant and adjuvant to temozolomide-based chemoradiation compared with temozolomide-chemoradiation for unresectable glioblastoma: final results of the TEMAVIR study from ANOCEF†

BACKGROUND

Prognosis of unresectable glioblastoma (GB) remains poor, despite temozolomide (TMZ)-based chemoradiation. Activity of bevacizumab (BEV) and irinotecan (IRI) has been reported in recurrent disease. We evaluated BEV and IRI as neo-adjuvant and adjuvant treatment combined with TMZ-based chemoradiation for unresectable GB.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with unresectable GB, age 18-70, IK ≥50 were eligible. The experimental arm (BEV/IRI) consisted of neo-adjuvant intravenous BEV, 10 mg/kg, and IRI, 125 mg/m(2), every 2 weeks for four cycles before radiotherapy (RT) (60 Gy), concomitant oral TMZ, 75 mg/m(2)/day, and BEV, 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Adjuvant BEV and IRI were given every 2 weeks for 6 months. The control arm consisted of concomitant oral TMZ, 75 mg/m(2)/day during RT, and 150-200 mg/m(2) for 5 days every 28 days for 6 months. The use of BEV was allowed at progression in the control arm.

RESULTS

Patients (120) were included from April 2009 to January 2011. The working hypothesis was that treatment would increase the progression-free survival at 6 month (PFS-6) from 50% to 66%. The primary objective was not achieved, and only 30 out of 60 patients were alive without progression at 6 months (50.0% [IC95% (36.8; 63.1)] in the BEV/IRI arm when 37 out of 60 patients were required according to the Fleming decision rules. PFS-6 was 7.1 months in BEV/IRI versus 5.2 months in the control arm. The median overall survival was not different between the two arms (11.1 months). Main toxicities were three fatal intracranial bleedings, three bile duct or digestive perforations/infections (1 fatal), and six thrombotic episodes in the BEV/IRI arm, whereas there was one intracranial bleeding, two bile duct or digestive perforations/infections (1 fatal), and one thrombotic episode in the control arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant BEV/IRI, combined with TMZ-radiation, is not recommended for further evaluation in the first-line treatment of unresectable GB.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trial registered under EUDRACT number 2008-002775-28 (NCT01022918).

Improving the time-machine: estimating date of birth of grade II gliomas

OBJECTIVES

Here we present a model aiming to provide an estimate of time from tumour genesis, for grade II gliomas. The model is based on a differential equation describing the diffusion-proliferation process. We have applied our model to situations where tumour diameter was shown to increase linearly with time, with characteristic diametric velocity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We have performed numerical simulations to analyse data, on patients with grade II gliomas and to extract information concerning time of tumour biological onset, as well as radiology and distribution of model parameters.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

We show that the estimate of tumour onset obtained from extrapolation using a constant velocity assumption, always underestimates biological tumour age, and that the correction one should add to this estimate is given roughly by 20/v (year), where v is the diametric velocity of expansion of the tumour (expressed in mm/year). Within the assumptions of the model, we have identified two types of tumour: the first corresponds to very slowly growing tumours that appear during adolescence, and the second type corresponds to slowly growing tumours that appear later, during early adulthood. That all these tumours become detectable around a mean patient age of 30 years could be interesting for formulation of strategies for early detection of tumours.