Health-related quality of life, cognitive screening, and functional status in a randomized phase III trial (EF-14) of tumor treating fields with temozolomide compared to temozolomide alone in newly diagnosed glioblastoma

A review on potential heterocycles for the treatment of glioblastoma targeting receptor tyrosine kinases

Glioblastoma, the most aggressive form of brain tumor, poses significant challenges in terms of treatment success and patient survival. Current treatment modalities for glioblastoma include radiation therapy, surgical intervention, and chemotherapy. Unfortunately, the median survival rate remains dishearteningly low at 12-15 months. One of the major obstacles in treating glioblastoma is the recurrence of tumors, making chemotherapy the primary approach for secondary glioma patients. However, the efficacy of drugs is hampered by the presence of the blood-brain barrier and multidrug resistance mechanisms. Consequently, considerable research efforts have been directed toward understanding the underlying signaling pathways involved in glioma and developing targeted drugs. To tackle glioma, numerous studies have examined kinase-downstream signaling pathways such as RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK-MPAK. By targeting specific signaling pathways, heterocyclic compounds have demonstrated efficacy in glioma therapeutics. Additionally, key kinases including phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), serine/threonine kinase, cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase (CTK), receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) and lipid kinase (LK) have been considered for investigation. These pathways play crucial roles in drug effectiveness in glioma treatment. Heterocyclic compounds, encompassing pyrimidine, thiazole, quinazoline, imidazole, indole, acridone, triazine, and other derivatives, have shown promising results in targeting these pathways. As part of this review, we propose exploring novel structures with low toxicity and high potency for glioma treatment. The development of these compounds should strive to overcome multidrug resistance mechanisms and efficiently penetrate the blood-brain barrier. By optimizing the chemical properties and designing compounds with enhanced drug-like characteristics, we can maximize their therapeutic value and minimize adverse effects. Considering the complex nature of glioblastoma, these novel structures should be rigorously tested and evaluated for their efficacy and safety profiles.

Tumor treating fields for the treatment of glioblastoma: Current understanding and future perspectives

Background

This review focuses on the recently published evidence on tumor treating fields (TTFields) administered alone or in combination with locoregional and systemic options for treating glioblastoma (GBM) in the past ten years. The aim is to critically summarize the novelty and results obtained with this innovative tool, which is becoming part of the armamentarium of neurosurgeons and neuro-oncologists.

Methods

A comprehensive search and analysis were conducted on pivotal studies published in the past ten years. Furthermore, all completed clinical trials, whose results were published on clinicaltrials.gov, were examined and included in the present review, encompassing both recurrent (r) and newly diagnosed (n) GBM. Finally, an additional examination of the ongoing clinical trials was also conducted.

Results

Recent trials have shown promising results both in patients with nGBM and rGBM/progressive (rGBM), leading to Food and Drug Administration approval in selected patients and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons to include TTFields into current guidelines on the management of GBM (P100034/S001-029). Recently, different randomized trials have demonstrated promising results of TTFields in combination with standard treatment of n- and rGBM, especially when considering progression-free and overall survival, maintaining a low rate of mild to moderate adverse events.

Conclusion

Optimal outcomes were obtained in nGBM and progressive disease. A possible future refinement of TTFields could significantly impact the treatment of rGBM and the actual standard of care for GBM, given the better safety profile and survival effects.

Initial Treatment of IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma in Adults Older Than 70 Years

The incidence of glioblastoma, the most common malignant primary brain tumour in adults, increases after the age of 40 and peaks in adults aged 75-84 years. Initial management involves maximising surgical resection while preserving neurologic function. IDH mutations and MGMT promoter methylation should be checked in tumour samples. Radiation and temozolomide constitute initial treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients with good functional status. It is suggested that patients who have received concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide treatment should undergo six cycles of adjuvant monthly temozolomide, as opposed to a more extended treatment regimen. Low-intensity alternating electric field therapy improved survival in a large randomised trial. We provide a detailed review, providing the latest treatment viewpoint for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma and including the current situation of immunotherapy. The treatment ideas and methods reviewed here would be of help to physicians when they encounter patients with this kind of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma in clinical practice.

Meta-Analysis of Modulated Electro-Hyperthermia and Tumor Treating Fields in the Treatment of Glioblastomas

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma is one of the most difficult to treat and most aggressive brain tumors, having a poor survival rate. The use of non-invasive modulated electro-hyperthermia (mEHT) and Tumor Treating Fields (TTF) devices has been introduced in the last few decades, both of which having proven anti-tumor effects.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies about mEHT and TTF was conducted.

RESULTS

A total of seven and fourteen studies about mEHT and TTF were included, with a total number of 450 and 1309 cases, respectively. A 42% [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 25-59%] 1-year survival rate was found for mEHT, which was raised to 61% (95% CI: 32-89%) if only the studies conducted after 2008 were investigated. In the case of TTF, 1-year survival was 67% (95% CI: 53-81%). Subgroup analyses revealed that newly diagnosed patients might get extra benefits from the early introduction of the devices (mEHT all studies: 73% vs. 37%, p = 0.0021; mEHT studies after 2008: 73% vs. 54%, p = 0.4214; TTF studies: 83% vs. 52%, p = 0.0083), compared with recurrent glioblastoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis showed that both mEHT and TTF can improve glioblastoma survival, and the most benefit may be achieved in newly diagnosed cases.

Anti-cancer mechanisms of action of therapeutic alternating electric fields (tumor treating fields [TTFields])

Despite improved survival outcomes across many cancer types, the prognosis remains grim for certain solid organ cancers including glioblastoma and pancreatic cancer. Invariably in these cancers, the control achieved by time-limited interventions such as traditional surgical resection, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy is short-lived. A new form of anti-cancer therapy called therapeutic alternating electric fields (AEFs) or tumor treating fields (TTFields) has been shown, either by itself or in combination with chemotherapy, to have anti-cancer effects that translate to improved survival outcomes in patients. Although the pre-clinical and clinical data are promising, the mechanisms of TTFields are not fully elucidated. Many investigations are underway to better understand how and why TTFields is able to selectively kill cancer cells and impede their proliferation. The purpose of this review is to summarize and discuss the reported mechanisms of action of TTFields from pre-clinical studies (both in vitro and in vivo). An improved understanding of how TTFields works will guide strategies focused on the timing and combination of TTFields with other therapies, to further improve survival outcomes in patients with solid organ cancers.

Re-examining popular screening measures in neuro-oncology: MMSE and RBANS

BACKGROUND

The Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) is routinely used in neuro-oncology clinics to rule out cognitive impairment. However, the MMSE is known to have poor sensitivity to mild cognitive impairment, raising concern regarding its continued use. More comprehensive cognitive screeners are available, such as the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), and may be better able to assess for cognitive dysfunction.

METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional study compared the relative rates of impairment using the MMSE-2 and RBANS in a sample of neuro-oncology patients (N = 81). A preliminary analysis of the sensitivity and specificity of the MMSE-2 to the level of cognitive impairment identified on the RBANS was conducted; in addition, we examined whether an adjustment of the MMSE-2 cut-off score improved consensus with a positive screening on the RBANS.

RESULTS

The MMSE-2 failed to identify over half of the patients with cognitive dysfunction that were identified on the RBANS. Further analysis showed limited sensitivity of the MMSE-2 to the level of impairment detected on the RBANS, and an adjustment of the cut-off score did not improve the sensitivity or specificity of the MMSE-2.

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide caution for neuro-oncology clinics using the MMSE. If providers continue to rely on the MMSE to screen for cognitive impairment alone, they may fail to identify individuals with mild cognitive impairments.

Obstacles to Glioblastoma Treatment Two Decades after Temozolomide

Simple Summary

Glioblastomas are the most common and aggressive brain tumors in adults, with a median survival of 15 months. Treatment is surgical removal, followed by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Current chemotherapeutics do not kill all the tumor cells and some cells survive, leading to the appearance of a new tumor resistant to the treatment. These treatment-resistant cells are called tumor stem cells. In addition, glioblastoma cells have a high capacity for migration, forming new tumors in areas distant from the original tumor. Studies are now focused on understanding the molecular mechanisms of chemoresistance and controlling drug entry into the brain to improve drug performance. Another promising therapeutic approach is the use of viruses that specifically destroy glioblastoma cells, preserving the neural tissue around the tumor. In this review, we summarize the main biological features of glioblastoma and the therapeutic targets that are currently under study for new clinical trials.

Abstract

Glioblastomas are considered the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor in adults, with an average of 15 months’ survival rate. The treatment is surgery resection, followed by chemotherapy with temozolomide, and/or radiotherapy. Glioblastoma must have wild-type IDH gene and some characteristics, such as TERT promoter mutation, EGFR gene amplification, microvascular proliferation, among others. Glioblastomas have great heterogeneity at cellular and molecular levels, presenting distinct phenotypes and diversified molecular signatures in each tumor mass, making it difficult to define a specific therapeutic target. It is believed that the main responsibility for the emerge of these distinct patterns lies in subcellular populations of tumor stem cells, capable of tumor initiation and asymmetric division. Studies are now focused on understanding molecular mechanisms of chemoresistance, the tumor microenvironment, due to hypoxic and necrotic areas, cytoskeleton and extracellular matrix remodeling, and in controlling blood brain barrier permeabilization to improve drug delivery. Another promising therapeutic approach is the use of oncolytic viruses that are able to destroy specifically glioblastoma cells, preserving the neural tissue around the tumor. In this review, we summarize the main biological characteristics of glioblastoma and the cutting-edge therapeutic targets that are currently under study for promising new clinical trials.

The Routine Application of Tumor-Treating Fields in the Treatment of Glioblastoma WHO° IV

Introduction:

Tumor-treating fields (TTFs) are a specific local oncological treatment modality in glioblastoma multiforme WHO° IV (GBM). Their mechanism of action is based on the effect of electrical fields interfering with the mitotic activity of malignant cells. Prospective studies have demonstrated efficacy, but TTF benefits are still controversially discussed. This treatment was implemented in our center as the standard of care in January 2016. We thus discuss the current state of the art and our long-term experience in the routine application of TTF.

Methods

The data of 48 patients suffering from GBM and treated with TTF were assessed and compared with previously published studies. Up-to-date information from open sources was evaluated.

Results

A total of 31 males and 17 females harboring a GBM were treated with TTF, between January 2016 and August 2021, in our center. In 98% of cases, TTFs were started within 6 weeks after concomitant radiochemotherapy (Stupp protocol). Mean overall survival was 22.6 months (95% CI: 17.3–27.9). Current indications, benefits, and restrictions were evaluated. Future TTF opportunities and ongoing studies were reviewed.

Conclusion

TTFs are a feasible and routinely applicable specific oncological treatment option for glioblastoma multiforme WHO° IV. Further research is ongoing to extend the indications and the efficacy of TTF.

The Anti-Glioma Effect of Juglone Derivatives through ROS Generation

Juglone has been extensively reported as a natural antitumor pigment. However, it is easy to be oxidized due to active hydroxy in the quinone. Here, we designed some new juglone derivatives, as the hydroxy was replaced by methyl (D1), allyl (D2), butyl (D3), and benzyl (D4) groups. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectra and mass spectrometry were applied to confirm the derivatives and oxidative products of juglone. U87 and U251 cell lines were used for tests in vitro, and primary human glioblastoma cells were applied for in vivo experiments. The CCK8 and EdU assay demonstrated the anti-tumor effect of the four derivatives, and IC50 for U87 was 3.99, 3.28, 7.60, and 11.84 μM, respectively. In U251, IC50 was 7.00, 5.43, 8.64, and 18.05 μM, respectively. D2 and D3 were further selected, and flow cytometry showed that apoptosis rates were increased after D2 or D3 treatment via ROS generation. Potential targets were predicted by network pharmacology analysis, most of which were associated with apoptosis, cell cycle, and metabolism pathway. CDC25B and DUSP1 were two of the most likely candidates for targets. The orthotopic glioblastoma model was established to evaluate the anti-glioma effect and side-effect of juglone derivatives, and the in vivo experiments confirmed the anti-glioma effects of juglone derivatives. In conclusion, new derivatives of juglone were created via chemical group substitution and could inhibit glioma cell viability and proliferation and induce apoptosis rate via ROS generation.

Optimal managements of elderly patients with glioblastoma

Optimizing the management of elderly patients with glioblastoma is an ongoing task in neuro-oncology. The number of patients with this tumor type is gradually increasing with the aging of the population. Although available data and practice recommendations remain limited, the current strategy is maximal safe surgical resection followed by radiotherapy in combination with temozolomide. However, survival is significantly worse than that in the younger population. Surgical resection provides survival benefit in patients with good performance status. Hypofractionated radiotherapy decreases toxicities while maintaining therapeutic efficacy, thus improving treatment adherence and subsequently leading to better quality of life. The intensity of these treatments should be balanced with patient-specific factors and consideration of quality of life. This review discusses the current optimal management in terms of efficacy and safety, as well as future perspectives.

Corticosteroids use and neurocognitive functioning in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: evidence from European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial 26101

Background

In patients with recurrent glioblastoma, corticosteroids are frequently used to mitigate intracranial pressure and to improve patient neurological functioning. To date, in these patients, no systematic studies have been performed to assess neurocognitive functioning (NCF) in relation to corticosteroid treatment.

Methods

Using baseline data (ie, prior to randomization) of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial 26101, we performed regression analysis to assess the predictive value of corticosteroid intake on performance of the EORTC brain tumor clinical trial NCF test battery. The battery is comprised of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test—Revised (HVLT-R), Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWA), and Trail Making Test (A and B).

Results

Out of 321 patients, 148 (46.1%) were not using corticosteroids, and 173 were using dexamethasone (34.3%), methylprednisolone (9.7%), or other corticosteroids (9.9%). Patients on corticosteroids had worse performance on all neurocognitive tests. Regression analyses demonstrated a negative association between corticosteroids use and the HVLT-R free recall score (R² change = 0.034, F change (1, 272) = 13.392, P < .001) and HVLT-R Delayed Recall score (R² change = 0.028, F change (1, 270) = 10.623, P = .002). No statistically significant association was found for HVLT-R Delayed recognition, COWA, TMT part A and TMT part B (P > .05).

Conclusions

Glioblastoma patients prescribed with corticosteroids show poorer memory functions, expressive language, visual-motor scanning speed, and executive functioning than patients not using corticosteroids. Furthermore, we found a negative association between corticosteroid intake and memory functions. The possibility of deleterious effects of corticosteroids on NCF should be considered during clinical decision making.

Pretreatment patient-reported cognitive function in patients with diffuse glioma

Purpose

Cognitive function is frequently assessed with objective neuropsychological tests, but patient-reported cognitive function is less explored. We aimed to investigate the preoperative prevalence of patient-reported cognitive impairment in patients with diffuse glioma compared to a matched reference group and explore associated factors.

Methods

We included 237 patients with diffuse glioma and 474 age- and gender-matched controls from the general population. Patient-reported cognitive function was measured using the cognitive function subscale in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 questionnaire. The transformed scale score (0–100) was dichotomized, with a score of ≤ 75 indicating clinically important patient-reported cognitive impairment. Factors associated with preoperative patient-reported cognitive impairment were explored in a multivariable regression analysis.

Results

Cognitive impairment was reported by 49.8% of the diffuse glioma patients and by 23.4% in the age- and gender-matched reference group (p < 0.001). Patients with diffuse glioma had 3.2 times higher odds (95% CI 2.29, 4.58, p < 0.001) for patient-reported cognitive impairment compared to the matched reference group. In the multivariable analysis, large tumor volume, left tumor lateralization, and low Karnofsky Performance Status score were found to be independent predictors for preoperative patient-reported cognitive impairment.

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate that patient-reported cognitive impairment is a common symptom in patients with diffuse glioma pretreatment, especially in patients with large tumor volumes, left tumor lateralization, and low functional levels. Patient-reported cognitive function may provide important information about patients’ subjective cognitive health and disease status and may serve as a complement to or as a screening variable for subsequent objective testing.

Health-Related Quality of Life for Patients Receiving Tumor Treating Fields for Glioblastoma

Background

To date, there has been no large-scale, real-world study of the health-related quality of life outcomes for patients using tumor treating fields (TTFields) therapy for glioblastoma (GBM) treatment.

Methods

A survey was mailed to 2,815 patients actively using TTFields for treatment of GBM in the USA (n = 2,182) and Europe (n = 633). The survey included patient-reported demographic and clinical information, as well as EuroQol’s EQ-5D-5L and visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) overall health score.

Results

A total of 1,106 applicable patients responded to the survey (USA = 782 and Europe = 324), with a mean age of 58.6 years (SD = 12.3). The average time since diagnosis and time using TTFields were 21.5 months (SD = 25.1) and 13.5 months (SD = 13.2), respectively. Over 61% of patients had been diagnosed at least 1 year prior and 28.4% at least 2 years prior; 45 patients (4.2%) had been diagnosed at least 5 years prior. Progressed disease was reported in 307 patients, while 690 reported non-progressed disease. Regression analyses showed that GBM disease progression and older age had predictable negative associations (p < 0.001) with most EQ-5D-5L dimensions and the EQ-VAS. However, longer time since diagnosis was associated with improved self-care (p < 0.05), usual activities (p < 0.01), and EQ-VAS (p < 0.05) overall and in patients with progressed disease (p < 0.01, p < 0.05, and p < 0.01, respectively). Additionally, longer time using TTFields was associated with improved mobility (p < 0.05), self-care (p < 0.001), usual activities (p < 0.01), and EQ-VAS (p < 0.01) overall; with improved EQ-VAS in progression-free patients (p < 0.05); and with improved mobility (p < 0.05), self-care (p < 0.01), usual activities (p < 0.05), and EQ-VAS (p < 0.05) in patients with progressed disease.

Conclusion

This is the largest real-world study of patient-reported quality of life in GBM and TTFields treatment to date. It shows unsurprising negative associations between quality of life and disease progression and older age, as well as more novel, positive associations between quality of life and longer time since diagnosis and time using TTFields therapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) in Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: Subgroup Analysis of the Phase 3 EF-14 Clinical Trial

Background

Understudied elderly patients comprise a large segment of high-risk patients with glioblastoma (GBM) that are challenging to treat. Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) is a locoregional, noninvasive, antimitotic therapy delivering low-intensity, intermediate-frequency alternating electric fields to the tumor. In the phase 3 EF-14 clinical trial, TTFields (200 kHz) improved median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) in patients with newly diagnosed GBM (ndGBM) when added concomitantly to maintenance temozolomide (TMZ). This EF-14 subgroup analysis evaluated the safety and efficacy of TTFields in elderly patients.

Methods

All 134 patients who are ≥65 years of age were included (TTFields/TMZ combination, n=89; TMZ monotherapy, n=45; 2:1 ratio of randomization). PFS and OS were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methodology (α=0.05). Health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality-of-life questionnaire QLQ-C30 supplemented with the brain tumor module (QLQ-BN20). Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v4.0.

Results

The PFS was 6.5 months in patients randomized to the treatment group with TTFields/TMZ combination versus 3.9 months in patients treated with TMZ monotherapy (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.30-0.74; P=0.0236). The OS was 17.4 months in patients treated with TTFields/TMZ combination versus 13.7 months in patients treated with TMZ monotherapy (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.33-0.77; P=0.0204). Annual survival rates with TTFields/TMZ versus TMZ monotherapy were 39% (95% CI, 29-50%) versus 27% (95% CI, 15-41%; P=0.072) at 2 years, 19% (95% CI, 11-29%) versus 11% (95% CI, 4-23%; P=0.135) at 3 years, and 15% (95% CI, 7-25%) versus 0% at 5 years, respectively. There were no significant differences between groups in the preselected items of HRQoL assessment. Grade ≥3 systemic AEs were 46% in the TTFields/TMZ group versus 40% in the TMZ monotherapy group, without statistically significant difference between the two groups. The only TTFields-related AEs were reversible scalp skin reactions, with grades 1-2 and grade 3 skin reactions reported by 51% and 2% of patients, respectively.

Conclusions

Combining TTFields with maintenance TMZ significantly improved PFS and OS in elderly patients with ndGBM in the phase 3 EF-14 clinical trial, without significant increases in systemic toxicity or negatively affecting patient HRQoL. TTFields-related skin AEs were low-grade and manageable.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00916409, identifier: NCT00916409.

Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Early Recurrence in Glioblastoma Patients: A Glance Towards Precision Medicine

BACKGROUND

Ability to thrive and time-to-recurrence following treatment are important parameters to assess in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), given its dismal prognosis. Though there is an ongoing debate whether it can be considered an appropriate surrogate endpoint for overall survival in clinical trials, progression-free survival (PFS) is routinely used for clinical decision-making.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether machine learning (ML)-based models can reliably stratify newly diagnosed GBM patients into prognostic subclasses on PFS basis, identifying those at higher risk for an early recurrence (≤6 mo).

METHODS

Data were extracted from a multicentric database, according to the following eligibility criteria: histopathologically verified GBM and follow-up >12 mo: 474 patients met our inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Relevant demographic, clinical, molecular, and radiological variables were selected by a feature selection algorithm (Boruta) and used to build a ML-based model.

RESULTS

Random forest prediction model, evaluated on an 80:20 split ratio, achieved an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77; 0.83) demonstrating high discriminative ability. Optimizing the predictive value derived from the linear and nonlinear combinations of the selected input features, our model outperformed across all performance metrics multivariable logistic regression.

CONCLUSION

A robust ML-based prediction model that identifies patients at high risk for early recurrence was successfully trained and internally validated. Considerable effort remains to integrate these predictions in a patient-centered care context.

Tumor treating fields combined with a poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor during radiotherapy for rapidly progressing IDH-wildtype diffuse astrocytoma: a case report

A 57-year-old woman was diagnosed with IDH-wildtype (IDHwt) astrocytoma (World Health Organization grade II) with the molecular characteristics of glioblastoma. She underwent concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy according to the Stupp protocol in combination with a multi-target antiangiogenic drug and additional intrathecal chemotherapy using methotrexate. During treatment, the patient’s tumor showed rapid progression. The chemotherapy with temozolomide was stopped and replaced with radiotherapy combined with tumor treating fields (TTF), the poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor niraparib, and anlotinib. After the radiotherapy was completed, the symptoms of increased intracranial pressure and epilepsy were well controlled. Considering the patient’s tolerance to the treatment, the combined therapy of TTF and anlotinib was continued, and osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor–tyrosine kinase inhibitor with good permeability of the blood–brain barrier, was added. The patient was regularly followed up and had no obvious adverse drug reactions. Head magnetic resonance imaging (plain scan + enhanced scan) suggested that the lesions were stable. For rapidly progressing glioblastomas or histological grade II/III IDHwt astrocytomas, the combination of TTF and a PARP inhibitor during radiotherapy may have a synergistic effect on tumor control and is well tolerated by patients.

Challenges and Perspectives of Standard Therapy and Drug Development in High-Grade Gliomas

Despite their low incidence rate globally, high-grade gliomas (HGG) remain a fatal primary brain tumor. The recommended therapy often is incapable of resecting the tumor entirely and exclusively targeting the tumor leads to tumor recurrence and dismal prognosis. Additionally, many HGG patients are not well suited for standard therapy and instead, subjected to a palliative approach. HGG tumors are highly infiltrative and the complex tumor microenvironment as well as high tumor heterogeneity often poses the main challenges towards the standard treatment. Therefore, a one-fit-approach may not be suitable for HGG management. Thus, a multimodal approach of standard therapy with immunotherapy, nanomedicine, repurposing of older drugs, use of phytochemicals, and precision medicine may be more advantageous than a single treatment model. This multimodal approach considers the environmental and genetic factors which could affect the patient's response to therapy, thus improving their outcome. This review discusses the current views and advances in potential HGG therapeutic approaches and, aims to bridge the existing knowledge gap that will assist in overcoming challenges in HGG.

Tumour treating fields therapy for glioblastoma: current advances and future directions

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumour in adults and continues to portend poor survival, despite multimodal treatment using surgery and chemoradiotherapy. The addition of tumour-treating fields (TTFields)-an approach in which alternating electrical fields exert biophysical force on charged and polarisable molecules known as dipoles-to standard therapy, has been shown to extend survival for patients with newly diagnosed GBM, recurrent GBM and mesothelioma, leading to the clinical approval of this approach by the FDA. TTFields represent a non-invasive anticancer modality consisting of low-intensity (1-3 V/cm), intermediate-frequency (100-300 kHz), alternating electric fields delivered via cutaneous transducer arrays configured to provide optimal tumour-site coverage. Although TTFields were initially demonstrated to inhibit cancer cell proliferation by interfering with mitotic apparatus, it is becoming increasingly clear that TTFields show a broad mechanism of action by disrupting a multitude of biological processes, including DNA repair, cell permeability and immunological responses, to elicit therapeutic effects. This review describes advances in our current understanding of the mechanisms by which TTFields mediate anticancer effects. Additionally, we summarise the landscape of TTFields clinical trials across various cancers and consider how emerging preclinical data might inform future clinical applications for TTFields.

Machine Learning-Based Prediction of 6-Month Postoperative Karnofsky Performance Status in Patients with Glioblastoma: Capturing the Real-Life Interaction of Multiple Clinical and Oncologic Factors

OBJECTIVE

Ability to thrive after invasive and intensive treatment is an important parameter to assess in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) is used to identify those patients suitable for postoperative radiochemotherapy. The aim of the present study is to investigate whether machine learning (ML)-based models can reliably predict patients' KPS 6 months after surgery.

METHODS

A cohort of 416 patients undergoing surgery for a histopathologically confirmed GBM were collected from a multicentric database and split into a training and hold-out test set in an 80:20 ratio. Worsening of KPS at 6 months after surgery (compared with preoperative KPS) occurred in 138 patients (33.2%). Relevant preoperative, intraoperative, and immediately postoperative variables were selected by a recursive features selection algorithm (Boruta) and used to build 2 ML-based predictive models.

RESULTS

A random forest classifier and a random forest regressor were trained to predict 6 months postoperative KPS as a categorical (worsening vs. stable/improving) and continuous variables; they achieved, respectively, an area under the curve of 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.84) and a mean absolute error of 4.4 (95% confidence interval, 4.0-4.7). Leveraging the predictive value resulting from the combination of independent variables, the random forest classifier outperformed conventional statistics (area under the curve improvement of +21%).

CONCLUSIONS

Two robust ML-based prediction models were successfully trained and internally validated. Considerable effort remains to improve the interpretation of the results when these predictions are used in a patient-centered care context.

Advances in radiotherapy and comprehensive treatment of high-grade glioma: immunotherapy and tumor-treating fields

High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are the most common primary malignant brain tumors. They have a high degree of malignancy and show invasive growth. The personal treatment plan for HGG is based on the patient's age, performance status, and degree of tumor invasion. The basic treatment plan for HGG involves tumor resection, radiotherapy (RT) with concomitant temozolomide (TMZ), and adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy. The basic radiation technology includes conventional RT, three-dimensional conformal RT, intensity-modulated RT, and stereotactic RT. As our understanding of tumor pathogenesis has deepened, so-called comprehensive treatment schemes have attracted attention. These combine RT with chemotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, immunotherapy, or tumor-treating fields. These emerging treatments are expected to improve the prospects of patients with HGG. In the present article, we review the recent advances in RT and comprehensive treatment for patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent HGG.

Optimal treatment strategy for adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

To compare the efficacy and safety of treatments based on the Stupp protocol for adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and to determine the optimal treatment option for patients with different O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation statuses. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and odds ratios (ORs) for adverse events of grade 3 or higher (AEs ≥ 3). Twenty-one randomized controlled trials involving 6478 patients treated with 21 different treatment strategies were included. Results of the pooled HRs indicated tumor-treating fields (TTF) combined with the Stupp protocol resulted in the most favorable OS for patients with and without MGMT promoter methylation. Subgroup analyses by the two MGMT promoter statuses indicated that lomustine-temozolomide plus radiotherapy or TTF combination therapy was associated with the best OS for patients with methylated MGMT promoter (HR, 1.03; 95% credible interval [CI], 0.54-1.97), and standard cilengitide combination therapy or TTF combination treatment was associated with the best OS for patients with unmethylated MGMT promoter (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.67-1.64). Regarding AEs ≥ 3, there were no significant differences in pooled ORs. However, Bayesian ranking profiles that demonstrated intensive cilengitide combination therapy and TTF combination therapy have a similar possibility to cause the least toxicity. These results indicated that TTF combination therapy was associated with increased survival, irrespective of the MGMT promoter methylation status, and a relatively tolerated safety profile compared with other combination treatments. The optimal treatment option for glioblastoma patients with different MGMT promoter methylation statuses was different.

Impact of neurosurgical enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program on health-related quality of life in glioma patients: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

A novel neurosurgical enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program shortens postoperative hospital stay and accelerates functional recovery in elective craniotomy patients. There is a need to evaluate the impact of ERAS program on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

METHODS

In a single-center randomized controlled trial, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive perioperative ERAS or conventional care. As a secondary outcome, HRQOL was measured with the EORTC QLQ-C30/BN20 prior to randomization (baseline), at discharge, and at 3- and 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 65 patients (ERAS: n = 36, conventional care: n = 29) with pathologically confirmed glioma (WHO grade 2-4) were included in the analysis. Progression-free survival at 6 months and HRQOL at baseline were similar between the two groups. Changes of scores did not vary significantly over time, but differed significantly between intervention groups. A clinically relevant better QoL (at 3-month follow-up), physical functioning (at 6-month follow-up) and role functioning (at discharge) was observed in patients in the ERAS group. Symptom scores of constipation (at discharge), motor dysfunction (at discharge, 3- and 6-month follow-up), drowsiness (at 3- and 6-month follow-up), weakness of legs (at 3-month follow-up), and nausea/vomiting (at discharge and 6-month follow-up) were significantly lower in the ERAS group.

CONCLUSIONS

The neurosurgical ERAS program seems to improve functioning and symptoms scores in glioma patients within 6-month follow-up compared with conventional care. The intervention has a significant main effect HRQOL changes without significant interaction with time. Future well-powered multicenter studies are warranted to confirm this result and address long-term benefits. This study has been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=16480 ) with registration number ChiCTR-INR-16009662.

Sensitivity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in screening for cognitive impairment in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma

INTRODUCTION

Cognitive impairment is frequent in patients with high-grade glioma and requires cognitive follow-up. Cognitive screening tools such as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) have been used to assess cognition in these patients. Here we assessed the sensitivity of the MoCA in screening for cognitive impairment in a cohort of 156 patients with newly-diagnosed high-grade glioma, after surgery and before radiochemotherapy.

METHODS

We assessed cognitive performance with the MoCA and a neuropsychological battery. Cognitive scores were analyzed in terms of a previously validated framework designed to control false positives and data for 1003 control participants from the GRECOGVASC study. After comparison of performance on the tests, we used stepwise logistic regression to produce a cognitive summary score from the neuropsychological battery. Then we analyzed sensitivity and specificity of the MoCA with receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

Both raw and adjusted MoCA scores showed only moderate sensitivity. The area under the ROC curve was 0.759 (95% CI 0.703-0.815) for the raw score and 0.788 (95% CI 0.734-0.842) for the adjusted score. Optimal discrimination was obtained with a raw score ≤ 25 (sensitivity: 0.526; specificity: 0.832; positive predictive value: 0.2; negative predictive value: 0.96) and an adjusted score - 0.603 (sensitivity: 0.716; specificity: 0.768; positive predictive value: 0.24; negative predictive value: 0.96).

CONCLUSION

The moderate sensitivity of MoCA indicates that it is not a suitable screening tool for detecting cognitive impairment in patients with newly-diagnosed high-grade glioma.

Treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in the elderly: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A glioblastoma is a fatal type of brain tumour for which the standard of care is maximum surgical resection followed by chemoradiotherapy, when possible. Age is an important consideration in this disease, as older age is associated with shorter survival and a higher risk of treatment-related toxicity.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the most effective and best-tolerated approaches for the treatment of elderly people with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. To summarise current evidence for the incremental resource use, utilities, costs and cost-effectiveness associated with these approaches.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched electronic databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and Embase to 3 April 2019, and the NHS Economic Evaluation Database (EED) up to database closure. We handsearched clinical trial registries and selected neuro-oncology society conference proceedings from the past five years.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials (RCTs) of treatments for glioblastoma in elderly people. We defined 'elderly' as 70+ years but included studies defining 'elderly' as over 65+ years if so reported.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods for study selection and data extraction. Where sufficient data were available, treatment options were compared in a network meta-analysis (NMA) using Stata software (version 15.1). For outcomes with insufficient data for NMA, pairwise meta-analysis were conducted in RevMan. The GRADE approach was used to grade the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 12 RCTs involving approximately 1818 participants. Six were conducted exclusively among elderly people (either defined as 65 years or older or 70 years or older) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, the other six reported data for an elderly subgroup among a broader age range of participants. Most participants were capable of self-care. Study quality was commonly undermined by lack of outcome assessor blinding and attrition. NMA was only possible for overall survival; other analyses were pair-wise meta-analyses or narrative syntheses. Seven trials contributed to the NMA for overall survival, with interventions including supportive care only (one trial arm); hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT40; four trial arms); standard radiotherapy (RT60; five trial arms); temozolomide (TMZ; three trial arms); chemoradiotherapy (CRT; three trial arms); bevacizumab with chemoradiotherapy (BEV_CRT; one trial arm); and bevacizumab with radiotherapy (BEV_RT). Compared with supportive care only, NMA evidence suggested that all treatments apart from BEV_RT prolonged survival to some extent. Overall survival High-certainty evidence shows that CRT prolongs overall survival (OS) compared with RT40 (hazard ratio (HR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56 to 0.80) and low-certainty evidence suggests that CRT may prolong overall survival compared with TMZ (TMZ versus CRT: HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.98). Low-certainty evidence also suggests that adding BEV to CRT may make little or no difference (BEV_CRT versus CRT: HR 0.83, 95% CrI 0.48 to 1.44). We could not compare the survival effects of CRT with different radiotherapy fractionation schedules (60 Gy/30 fractions and 40 Gy/15 fractions) due to a lack of data. When treatments were ranked according to their effects on OS, CRT ranked higher than TMZ, RT and supportive care only, with the latter ranked last. BEV plus RT was the only treatment for which there was no clear benefit in OS over supportive care only.   One trial comparing tumour treating fields (TTF) plus adjuvant chemotherapy (TTF_AC) with adjuvant chemotherapy alone could not be included in the NMA as participants were randomised after receiving concomitant chemoradiotherapy, not before. Findings from the trial suggest that the intervention probably improves overall survival in this selected patient population. We were unable to perform NMA for other outcomes due to insufficient data. Pairwise analyses were conducted for the following. Quality of life Moderate-certainty narrative evidence suggests that overall, there may be little difference in QoL between TMZ and RT, except for discomfort from communication deficits, which are probably more common with RT (1 study, 306 participants, P = 0.002). Data on QoL for other comparisons were sparse, partly due to high dropout rates, and the certainty of the evidence tended to be low or very low. Progression-free survival High-certainty evidence shows that CRT increases time to disease progression compared with RT40 (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.61); moderate-certainty evidence suggests that RT60 probably increases time to disease progression compared with supportive care only (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.46), and that BEV_RT probably increases time to disease progression compared with RT40 alone (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.78). Evidence for other treatment comparisons was of low- or very low-certainty. Severe adverse events Moderate-certainty evidence suggests that TMZ probably increases the risk of grade 3+ thromboembolic events compared with RT60 (risk ratio (RR) 2.74, 95% CI 1.26 to 5.94; participants = 373; studies = 1) and also the risk of grade 3+ neutropenia, lymphopenia, and thrombocytopenia. Moderate-certainty evidence also suggests that CRT probably increases the risk of grade 3+ neutropenia, leucopenia and thrombocytopenia compared with hypofractionated RT alone. Adding BEV to CRT probably increases the risk of thromboembolism (RR 16.63, 95% CI 1.00 to 275.42; moderate-certainty evidence). Economic evidence There is a paucity of economic evidence regarding the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in the elderly. Only one economic evaluation on two short course radiotherapy regimen (25 Gy versus 40 Gy) was identified and its findings were considered unreliable.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

For elderly people with glioblastoma who are self-caring, evidence suggests that CRT prolongs survival compared with RT and may prolong overall survival compared with TMZ alone. For those undergoing RT or TMZ therapy, there is probably little difference in QoL overall. Systemic anti-cancer treatments TMZ and BEV carry a higher risk of severe haematological and thromboembolic events and CRT is probably associated with a higher risk of these events. Current evidence provides little justification for using BEV in elderly patients outside a clinical trial setting. Whilst the novel TTF device appears promising, evidence on QoL and tolerability is needed in an elderly population. QoL and economic assessments of CRT versus TMZ and RT are needed. More high-quality economic evaluations are needed, in which a broader scope of costs (both direct and indirect) and outcomes should be included.

Tumor treating fields in the management of Glioblastoma: opportunities for advanced imaging

Alternating electric fields have been successfully applied to cancer cells in-vitro to disrupt malignant progression and this antimitotic therapy has now been proven to be efficacious in Phase II and Phase III randomized clinical trials of patients with glioblastoma. With additional clinical trials ongoing in a number of other malignancies, there is a crucial need for a better understanding of the radiographic predictors of response and standardization of surveillance imaging interpretation. However, many radiologists have yet to become familiarized with this emerging cancer therapy and there is little active investigation to develop prognostic or predictive imaging biomarkers. This article provides an overview of the pre-clinical data that elucidate the biologic mechanisms of alternating electric fields as a cancer therapy. Results from clinical trials in patients with glioblastoma are then reviewed while elaborating on the several limitations to adoption of this promising line of treatment. Finally, a proposal for the development of imaging markers as a means of overcoming some of these limitations is made, which may improve treatment utilization by augmenting patient selection not only in glioblastoma, but also other malignant conditions for which this therapy is currently being evaluated.

Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Among High-Grade Glioma Patients Receiving TTFields Treatment: A Two Center Observational Study

Study design: A two center, observational study. Introduction: Patient reported outcome (PRO) plays an increasingly important role in the evaluation of novel therapies for tumor patients. It has been shown that tumor treating fields (TTFields) in combination with standard therapy prolong survival in high-grade glioma (hgG) patients. But critics claim that TTFields significantly impacts patients' everyday life due to side effects and average daily time on therapy (18 h) in a patient population with very limited life expectancy and high symptom burden. However, very limited data exist on PRO for TTFields treatment. Methods: This two center, observational study describes PRO of 30 hgG patients receiving TTFields in combination with chemotherapy. We introduced a device-specific questionnaire (DSQ) addressing device-specific restrictions and impact on daily live after 2 months of therapy. Additionally following questionnaires were used: EORTC (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer), QLQ-30 (Quality of life of cancer patients), QLQ BN20 (Quality of life brain cancer module), QLQ FA13 (Cancer-related fatigue), and SSUK-8 (social support). Results: Surveys have been completed by 91% of enrolled patients. EORTC QLQ-30 revealed better physical, emotional, and cognitive function than social and role function of study cohort. TTFields users reported frequently on positive social support and a low level of detrimental interactions. Seventy one percent of patients felt affected in daily life due to TTFields at least 2-3 times per week up to several times per day while maintaining high therapy compliance. Most frequent device-specific restrictions were duration of therapy (74%), size (66%), and weight (70%) of the device and changing time and bonding of the transducer arrays (66%, mean duration: 43.6 min). Restrictions on exercise of hobbies/work (63%/61%), body care (71%), and sexuality/relationship (64%) were most relevant. Seventy percent would recommend TTFields to others and 67% would reuse TTFields treatment again based on their current experience. Conclusion: The study shows that although TTFields treatment frequently affects everyday life in all aspects, therapy compliance was high and 67% of patients would reconsider TTFields for themselves. We propose that findings of PRO be taken into account for medical consultation about TTFields and in future device development to deliver high-value patient-centered care.

Current clinical management of patients with glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GB) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor, historically resistant to treatment, and with overall fatal outcome.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently, several molecular subgroups and rare genetic alterations have been described in GB. In this review article, we will describe the current clinical management of patients with GB in the United States, discuss selected next-generation molecular-targeted therapies in GB, and present ongoing clinical trials for patients with GB. This review is intended for clinical and preclinical researchers who conduct work on GB and would like to understand more about the current standard of treatment of GB patients, historical perspectives, current challenges, and ongoing and upcoming clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

GB is an extremely complex disease, and despite recent progress and advanced therapeutic strategies, the overall patient's prognosis remains dismal. Innovative strategies and integrative ways of approach to disease are urgently needed.

Glioblastoma Treatment Modalities besides Surgery

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is commonly known as the most aggressive primary CNS tumor in adults. The mean survival of it is 14 to 15 months, following the standard therapy from surgery, chemotherapy, to radiotherapy. Efforts in recent decades have brought many novel therapies to light, however, with limitations. In this paper, authors reviewed current treatments for GBM besides surgery. In the past decades, only radiotherapy, temozolomide (TMZ), and tumor treating field (TTF) were approved by FDA. Though promising in preclinical experiments, therapeutic effects of other novel treatments including BNCT, anti-angiogenic therapy, immunotherapy, epigenetic therapy, oncolytic virus therapy, and gene therapy are still either uncertain or discouraging in clinical results. In this review, we went through current clinical trials, underlying causes, and future therapy designs to present neurosurgeons and researchers a sketch of this field.

Long-term neurocognitive and other side effects of radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy, for glioma

BACKGROUND

Gliomas are brain tumours arising from glial cells with an annual incidence of 4 to 11 people per 100,000. In this review we focus on gliomas with low aggressive potential in the short term, i.e. low-grade gliomas. Most people with low-grade gliomas are treated with surgery and may receive radiotherapy thereafter. However, there is concern about the possible long-term effects of radiotherapy, especially on neurocognitive functioning.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the long-term neurocognitive and other side effects of radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy) compared with no radiotherapy, or different types of radiotherapy, among people with glioma (where 'long-term' is defined as at least two years after diagnosis); and to write a brief economic commentary.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases on 16 February 2018 and updated the search on 14 November 2018: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2018, Issue 11) in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE via Ovid; and Embase via Ovid. We also searched clinical trial registries and relevant conference proceedings from 2014 to 2018 to identify ongoing and unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and non-randomised trials, and controlled before-and-after studies (CBAS). Participants were aged 16 years and older with cerebral glioma other than glioblastoma. We included studies where patients in at least one treatment arm received radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy, and where neurocognitive outcomes were assessed two or more years after treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We assessed the certainty of findings using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

The review includes nine studies: seven studies were of low-grade glioma and two were of grade 3 glioma. Altogether 2406 participants were involved but there was high sample attrition and outcome data were available for a minority of people at final study assessments. In seven of the nine studies, participants were recruited to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which longer-term follow-up was undertaken in a subset of people that had survived without disease progression. There was moderate to high risk of bias in studies due to lack of blinding and high attrition, and in two observational studies there was high risk of selection bias. Paucity of data and risk of bias meant that evidence was of low to very low certainty. We were unable to combine results in meta-analysis due to diversity in interventions and outcomes.The studies examined the following five comparisons.Radiotherapy versus no adjuvant treatmentTwo observational studies contributed data. At the 12-year follow-up in one study, the risk of cognitive impairment (defined as cognitive disability deficits in at least five of 18 neuropsychological tests) was greater in the radiotherapy group (risk ratio (RR) 1.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02 to 3.71; n = 65); at five to six years the difference between groups did not reach statistical significance (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.06; n = 195). In the other study, one subject in the radiotherapy group had cognitive impairment (defined as significant deterioration in eight of 12 neuropsychological tests) at two years compared with none in the control group (very low certainty evidence).With regard to neurocognitive scores, in one study the radiotherapy group was reported to have had significantly worse mean scores on some tests compared with no radiotherapy; however, the raw data were only given for significant findings. In the second study, there were no clear differences in any of the various cognitive outcomes at two years (n = 31) and four years (n = 15) (very low certainty evidence).Radiotherapy versus chemotherapyOne RCT contributed data on cognitive impairment at up to three years with no clear difference between arms (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.36 to 5.70, n = 117) (low-certainty evidence).High-dose radiotherapy versus low-dose radiotherapyOnly one of two studies reporting this comparison contributed data, and at two and five years there were no clear differences between high- and low-dose radiotherapy arms (very low certainty evidence).Conventional radiotherapy versus stereotactic conformal radiotherapyOne study involving younger people contributed limited data from the subgroup aged 16 to 25 years. The numbers of participants with neurocognitive impairment at five years after treatment were two out of 12 in the conventional arm versus none out of 11 in the stereotactic conformal radiotherapy arm (RR 4.62, 95% CI 0.25 to 86.72; n = 23; low-certainty evidence).Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapyTwo RCTs tested for cognitive impairment. One defined cognitive impairment as a decline of more than 3 points in MMSE score compared with baseline and reported data from 2-year (110 participants), 3-year (91 participants), and 5-year (57 participants) follow-up with no clear difference between the two arms at any time point. A second study did not report raw data but measured MMSE scores over five years in 126 participants at two years, 110 at three years, 69 at four years and 53 at five years. Authors concluded that there was no difference in MMSE scores between the two study arms (P = 0.4752) (low-certainty evidence).Two RCTs reported quality of life (QoL) outcomes for this comparison. One reported no differences in Brain-QoL scores between study arms over a 5-year follow-up period (P = 0.2767; no raw data were given and denominators were not stated). The other trial reported that the long-term results of health-related QoL showed no difference between the arms but did not give the raw data for overall HRQoL scores (low-certainty evidence).We found no comparative data on endocrine dysfunction; we planned to develop a brief economic commentary but found no relevant economic studies for inclusion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy for gliomas with a good prognosis may increase the risk of neurocognitive side effects in the long term; however the magnitude of the risk is uncertain. Evidence on long-term neurocognitive side effects associated with chemoradiotherapy is also uncertain. Neurocognitive assessment should be an integral part of long-term follow-up in trials involving radiotherapy for lower-grade gliomas to improve the certainty of evidence regarding long-term neurocognitive effects. Such trials should also assess other potential long-term effects, including endocrine dysfunction, and evaluate costs and cost effectiveness.

A systematic review of cognitive function in patients with glioblastoma undergoing surgery

Background

Patients with glioblastoma (GB) are more likely to suffer cognitive deficits with poor quality of life as compared with lower-grade glioma patient groups, for whom cognition research is plentiful. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the cognitive function of patients with GB before and after surgery.

Methods

This review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO. PubMed and EMBASE searches were performed, most recently March 15, 2018. Inclusion criteria were adult patients, histologically confirmed GB, and cognitive tests conducted before and/or after surgery. Screening and data extraction were carried out independently by 2 authors.

Results

A total of 512 abstracts were screened. Nineteen studies were included with 902 participants, of whom only 423 had histologically confirmed GB. Only 11 studies tested cognitive function both before and after surgery. A total of 114 different cognitive tests were used. The most common test was used in only 9 studies; 82 tests were used only once. Follow-up time ranged from 1 week to 16 months with extremely high dropout rates. Eighteen of 19 studies reported cognitive deficits in their samples, with prevalence ranging from 22% to 100% (median 64%, interquartile range 42%). Only 1/11 longitudinal studies reported normal cognitive function, 3/11 reported initial deficits with improvement after surgery, 3/11 reported static deficits, and 4/11 reported deterioration.

Conclusion

There is a consistently high risk of cognitive deficit for patients with GB undergoing surgery. The included studies showed marked heterogeneity in study design, case-mix of included diagnoses, and the type and timing of cognitive tests used. We highlight considerations for the design of future studies to avoid such bias.

Triple-drug Therapy With Bevacizumab, Irinotecan, and Temozolomide Plus Tumor Treating Fields for Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Retrospective Study

Clinical studies treating pediatric and adult solid tumors, such as glioblastoma (GBM), with a triple-drug regimen of temozolomide (TMZ), bevacizumab (BEV), and irinotecan (IRI) [TBI] have demonstrated various efficacies, but with no unexpected toxicities. The TBI regimen has never been studied in recurrent GBM (rGBM) patients. In this retrospective study, we investigated the outcomes and side effects of rGBM patients who had received the TBI regimen. We identified 48 adult rGBM patients with a median age of 56 years (range: 26-76), who received Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) treatment for 30 days or longer, and concurrent salvage chemotherapies. The patients were classified into two groups based on chemotherapies received: TBI with TTFields (TBI+T, N = 18) vs. bevacizumab (BEV)-based chemotherapies with TTFields (BBC+T, N = 30). BBC regimens were either BEV monotherapy, BEV+IRI or BEV+CCNU. Patients in TBI+T group received on average 19 cycles of TMZ, 26 and 21 times infusions with BEV and IRI, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for rGBM (OS-R and PFS-R) patients who received TBI+T were 18.9 and 10.7 months, respectively. In comparison, patients who received BBC+T treatment had OS-R and PFS-R of 11.8 (P > 0.05) and 4.7 (P < 0.05) months, respectively. Although the median PFS results were significantly different by 1.5 months (6.6 vs. 5.1) between TBI+T and BBC+T groups, the median OS difference of 14.7 months (32.5 vs. 17.8) was more pronounced, P < 0.05. Patients tolerated TBI+T or BBC+T treatments well and there were no unexpected toxicities. The most common side effects from TBI+T treatment included grade III hypertension (38.9%) and leukopenia (22.2%). In conclusion, the TBI regimen might play a role in the improvement of PFS-R and OS-R among rGBM patients. Prospective studies with a larger sample size are warranted to study the efficacy and toxicity of TBI+T regimen for rGBM.

Tumor Treating Fields for Glioblastoma Treatment: Patient Satisfaction and Compliance With the Second-Generation Optune® System

Background:

Tumor treating fields (TTFields) are a non-invasive antimitotic therapy that delivers alternating electric fields via the Optune^® system. The Phase III EF-14 trial in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) showed significantly improved progression-free, overall and long-term survival when Optune was used together with maintenance temozolomide (TMZ) compared with TMZ alone. Compliance (average monthly use) was associated with better clinical outcome. The first-generation Optune system weighed approximately 6 pounds (~2.7 kg). The second-generation redesigned Optune system weighs 2.7 pounds (~1.2 kg). We tested and compared GBM patient experience with the second-generation system versus the first-generation system.

Methods:

Ten newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM patients in Germany (median age: 52.9 years [31-79]) were prospectively monitored over the first month of transitioning from the first-generation to the second-generation Optune system. Questionnaires using a numerical analog scale assessed feedback at baseline (first generation) and after 1 month of second-generation use.

Results:

After transitioning to the second-generation system, compliance improved by more than 10% in four patients, was maintained in five patients and decreased by more than 10% in one patient. Following transition, eight out of nine patients reported a reduction in the triggering of malfunction alarms. Self-reported patient feedback showed improved handling and portability (weight, mobility) of the second- versus the first-generation Optune system.

Conclusions:

This patient user survey suggests that patient satisfaction with the second-generation Optune system is improved versus the first-generation system. Improved features of the new system help patients achieve and maintain a higher rate of treatment compliance.

Effects of tumor treating fields (TTFields) on glioblastoma cells are augmented by mitotic checkpoint inhibition

Tumor treating fields (TTFields) are approved for glioblastoma (GBM) therapy. TTFields disrupt cell division by inhibiting spindle fiber formation. Spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) inhibition combined with antimitotic drugs synergistically decreases glioma cell growth in cell culture and mice. We hypothesized that SAC inhibition will increase TTFields efficacy. Human GBM cells (U-87 MG, GaMG) were treated with TTFields (200 kHz, 1.7 V/cm) and/or the SAC inhibitor MPS1-IN-3 (IN-3, 4 µM). Cells were counted after 24, 48, and 72 h of treatment and at 24 and 72 h after end of treatment (EOT). Flow cytometry, immunofluorescence microscopy, Annexin-V staining and TUNEL assay were used to detect alterations in cell cycle and apoptosis after 72 h of treatment. The TTFields/IN-3 combination decreased cell proliferation after 72 h compared to either treatment alone (−78.6% vs. TTFields, P = 0.0337; −52.6% vs. IN-3, P = 0.0205), and reduced the number of viable cells (62% less than seeded). There was a significant cell cycle shift from G1 to G2/M phase (P < 0.0001). The apoptotic rate increased to 44% (TTFields 14%, P = 0.0002; IN-3 4%, P < 0.0001). Cell growth recovered 24 h after EOT with TTFields and IN-3 alone, but the combination led to further decrease by 92% at 72 h EOT if IN-3 treatment was continued (P = 0.0288). The combination of TTFields and SAC inhibition led to earlier and prolonged effects that significantly augmented the efficacy of TTFields and highlights a potential new targeted multimodal treatment for GBM.

Radiotherapy of Glioblastoma 15 Years after the Landmark Stupp's Trial: More Controversies than Standards?

Background

The current standard of care of glioblastoma, the most common primary brain tumor in adults, has remained unchanged for over a decade. Nevertheless, some improvements in patient outcomes have occurred as a consequence of modern surgery, improved radiotherapy and up-to-date management of toxicity. Patients from control arms (receiving standard concurrent chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide) of recent clinical trials achieve better outcomes compared to the median survival of 14.6 months reported in Stupp’s landmark clinical trial in 2005. The approach to radiotherapy that emerged from Stupp’s trial, which continues to be a basis for the current standard of care, is no longer applicable and there is a need to develop updated guidelines for radiotherapy within the daily clinical practice that address or at least acknowledge existing controversies in the planning of radiotherapy.

The goal of this review is to provoke critical thinking about potentially controversial aspects in the radiotherapy of glioblastoma, including among others the issue of target definitions, simultaneously integrated boost technique, and hippocampal sparing.

Conclusions

In conjunction with new treatment approaches such as tumor-treating fields (TTF) and immunotherapy, the role of adjuvant radiotherapy will be further defined. The personalized approach in daily radiotherapy practice is enabled with modern radiotherapy systems.