1
|
Hajikarimloo B, Kavousi S, Jahromi GG, Mehmandoost M, Oraee-Yazdani S, Fahim F. Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy as an Alternative Therapeutic Option for Radiation-Induced Necrosis Following Radiotherapy for Intracranial Pathologies. World Neurosurg 2024; 186:51-61. [PMID: 38325705 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.01.161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy (RT) is a feasible adjuvant therapeutic option for managing intracranial pathologies. One of the late complications of RT that frequently develops within months following RT is radiation necrosis (RN). Corticosteroids are the first-line therapeutic option for RNs; however, in case of unfavorable outcomes or intolerability, several other options, including bevacizumab, laser interstitial thermal therapy, surgery, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). Our goal was to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of the application of HBOT in RNs following RT and help physicians make decisions based on the latest data in the literature. METHODS We provide a comprehensive review of the literature on the current issues of utilization of HBOT in RNs. RESULTS We included 11 studies with a total of 46 patients who underwent HBOT. Most of the cases were diagnosed with brain tumors or arteriovenous malformations. Improvement was achieved in most of the cases. DISCUSSION HBOT is a noninvasive therapeutic intervention that can play a role in adjuvant therapy concurrent with RT and chemotherapy and treating RNs. HBOT resolves the RN through 3 mechanisms, including angiogenesis, anti-inflammatory modulation, and cellular repair. Previous studies demonstrated that HBOT is a feasible and well-tolerated therapeutic option that has shown promising results in improving clinical and radiological outcomes in intracranial RNs. Complications of HBOT are usually mild and reversible. CONCLUSIONS HBOT is a feasible and effective therapeutic option in steroid-refractory RNs and is associated with favorable outcomes and a low rate of side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bardia Hajikarimloo
- Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shohada Tajrish Comprehensive Neurosurgical Center of Excellence, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Neurosurgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shahin Kavousi
- Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shohada Tajrish Comprehensive Neurosurgical Center of Excellence, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ghazaleh Ghaffaripour Jahromi
- Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shohada Tajrish Comprehensive Neurosurgical Center of Excellence, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahdi Mehmandoost
- Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shohada Tajrish Comprehensive Neurosurgical Center of Excellence, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Saeed Oraee-Yazdani
- Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shohada Tajrish Comprehensive Neurosurgical Center of Excellence, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Neurosurgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Tehran, Iran
| | - Farzan Fahim
- Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shohada Tajrish Comprehensive Neurosurgical Center of Excellence, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Neurosurgery, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ajithkumar T, Avanzo M, Yorke E, Tsang DS, Milano MT, Olch AJ, Merchant TE, Dieckmann K, Mahajan A, Fuji H, Paulino AC, Timmermann B, Marks LB, Bentzen SM, Jackson A, Constine LS. Brain and Brain Stem Necrosis After Reirradiation for Recurrent Childhood Primary Central Nervous System Tumors: A PENTEC Comprehensive Review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:655-668. [PMID: 38300187 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Reirradiation is increasingly used in children and adolescents/young adults (AYA) with recurrent primary central nervous system tumors. The Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) reirradiation task force aimed to quantify risks of brain and brain stem necrosis after reirradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS A systematic literature search using the PubMed and Cochrane databases for peer-reviewed articles from 1975 to 2021 identified 92 studies on reirradiation for recurrent tumors in children/AYA. Seventeen studies representing 449 patients who reported brain and brain stem necrosis after reirradiation contained sufficient data for analysis. While all 17 studies described techniques and doses used for reirradiation, they lacked essential details on clinically significant dose-volume metrics necessary for dose-response modeling on late effects. We, therefore, estimated incidences of necrosis with an exact 95% CI and qualitatively described data. Results from multiple studies were pooled by taking the weighted average of the reported crude rates from individual studies. RESULTS Treated cancers included ependymoma (n = 279 patients; 7 studies), medulloblastoma (n = 98 patients; 6 studies), any CNS tumors (n = 62 patients; 3 studies), and supratentorial high-grade gliomas (n = 10 patients; 1 study). The median interval between initial and reirradiation was 2.3 years (range, 1.2-4.75 years). The median cumulative prescription dose in equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD22; assuming α/β value = 2 Gy) was 103.8 Gy (range, 55.8-141.3 Gy). Among 449 reirradiated children/AYA, 22 (4.9%; 95% CI, 3.1%-7.3%) developed brain necrosis and 14 (3.1%; 95% CI, 1.7%-5.2%) developed brain stem necrosis with a weighted median follow-up of 1.6 years (range, 0.5-7.4 years). The median cumulative prescription EQD22 was 111.4 Gy (range, 55.8-141.3 Gy) for development of any necrosis, 107.7 Gy (range, 55.8-141.3 Gy) for brain necrosis, and 112.1 Gy (range, 100.2-117 Gy) for brain stem necrosis. The median latent period between reirradiation and the development of necrosis was 5.7 months (range, 4.3-24 months). Though there were more events among children/AYA undergoing hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated reirradiation, the differences were not statistically significant (P = .46). CONCLUSIONS Existing reports suggest that in children/AYA with recurrent brain tumors, reirradiation with a total EQD22 of about 112 Gy is associated with an approximate 5% to 7% incidence of brain/brain stem necrosis after a median follow-up of 1.6 years (with the initial course of radiation therapy being given with conventional prescription doses of ≤2 Gy per fraction and the second course with variable fractionations). We recommend a uniform approach for reporting dosimetric endpoints to derive robust predictive models of late toxicities following reirradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thankamma Ajithkumar
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| | - Michele Avanzo
- Division of Medical Physics, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico Aviano IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Ellen Yorke
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Derek S Tsang
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael T Milano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Arthur J Olch
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Thomas E Merchant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Karin Dieckmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Hiroshi Fuji
- National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, West German Cancer Center, Essen, Germany
| | - Lawrence B Marks
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Soren M Bentzen
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Radiation Oncology, and University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Andrew Jackson
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York; Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mayo ZS, Billena C, Suh JH, Lo SS, Chao ST. The dilemma of radiation necrosis from diagnosis to treatment in the management of brain metastases. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:S56-S65. [PMID: 38437665 PMCID: PMC10911797 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or whole brain radiation therapy is a mainstay of treatment for patients with brain metastases. The use of SRS in the management of brain metastases is becoming increasingly common and provides excellent local control. Cerebral radiation necrosis (RN) is a late complication of radiation treatment that can be seen months to years following treatment and is often indistinguishable from tumor progression on conventional imaging. In this review article, we explore risk factors associated with the development of radiation necrosis, advanced imaging modalities used to aid in diagnosis, and potential treatment strategies to manage side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary S Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Cole Billena
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - John H Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Samuel T Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zaghloul MS, Hunter A, Mostafa AG, Parkes J. Re-irradiation for recurrent/progressive pediatric brain tumors: from radiobiology to clinical outcomes. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2023; 23:709-717. [PMID: 37194207 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2215439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Brain tumors are the most common solid tumors in children. Neurosurgical excision, radiotherapy, and/or chemotherapy represent the standard of care in most histopathological types of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Even though the successful cure rate is reasonable, some patients may develop recurrence locally or within the neuroaxis. AREA COVERED The management of these recurrences is not easy; however, significant advances in neurosurgery, radiation techniques, radiobiology, and the introduction of newer biological therapies, have improved the results of their salvage treatment. In many cases, salvage re-irradiation is feasible and has achieved encouraging results. The results of re-irradiation depend upon several factors. These factors include tumor type, extent of the second surgery, tumor volume, location of the recurrence, time that elapses between the initial treatment, the combination with other treatment agents, relapse, and the initial response to radiotherapy. EXPERT OPINION Reviewing the radiobiological basis and clinical outcome of pediatric brain re-irradiation revealed that re-irradiation is safe, feasible, and indicated for recurrent/progressive different tumor types such as; ependymoma, medulloblastoma, diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) and glioblastoma. It is now considered part of the treatment armamentarium for these patients. The challenges and clinical results in treating recurrent pediatric brain tumors were highly documented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed S Zaghloul
- Radiation Oncology department. National Cancer Institute, Cairo University & Children's Cancer Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Alistair Hunter
- Division of Radiobiology, Radiation Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Ayatullah G Mostafa
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Egypt and Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Cairo University, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Jeannette Parkes
- Radiation Oncology Department, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
DEGRO practical guideline for central nervous system radiation necrosis part 2: treatment. Strahlenther Onkol 2022; 198:971-980. [PMID: 36038670 PMCID: PMC9581806 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01973-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The Working Group for Neurooncology of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO; AG NRO) in cooperation with members of the Neurooncological Working Group of the German Cancer Society (DKG-NOA) aimed to define a practical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of radiation-induced necrosis (RN) of the central nervous system (CNS). Methods Panel members of the DEGRO working group invited experts, participated in a series of conferences, supplemented their clinical experience, performed a literature review, and formulated recommendations for medical treatment of RN, including bevacizumab, in clinical routine. Conclusion Diagnosis and treatment of RN requires multidisciplinary structures of care and defined processes. Diagnosis has to be made on an interdisciplinary level with the joint knowledge of a neuroradiologist, radiation oncologist, neurosurgeon, neuropathologist, and neurooncologist. If the diagnosis of blood–brain barrier disruptions (BBD) or RN is likely, treatment should be initiated depending on the symptoms, location, and dynamic of the lesion. Multiple treatment options are available (such as observation, surgery, steroids, and bevacizumab) and the optimal approach should be discussed in an interdisciplinary setting. In this practice guideline, we offer detailed treatment strategies for various scenarios.
Collapse
|
6
|
Dashti SR, Kadner RJ, Folley BS, Sheehan JP, Han DY, Kryscio RJ, Carter MB, Shields LBE, Plato BM, La Rocca RV, Spalding AC, Yao TL, Fraser JF. Single low-dose targeted bevacizumab infusion in adult patients with steroid-refractory radiation necrosis of the brain: a phase II open-label prospective clinical trial. J Neurosurg 2022; 137:1676-1686. [DOI: 10.3171/2022.2.jns212006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
There is an unmet need for safe and rapidly effective therapies for refractory brain radiation necrosis (RN). The aim of this prospective single-arm phase II trial was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a single low-dose targeted bevacizumab infusion after blood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD) in adult patients with steroid-refractory brain RN.
METHODS
Ten adults with steroid-refractory, imaging-confirmed brain RN were enrolled between November 2016 and January 2018 and followed for 12 months after treatment. Bevacizumab 2.5 mg/kg was administered as a one-time targeted intra-arterial infusion immediately after BBBD. Primary outcomes included safety and > 25% decrease in lesion volume. Images were analyzed by a board-certified neuroradiologist blinded to pretrial diagnosis and treatment status. Secondary outcomes included changes in headache, steroid use, and functional status and absence of neurocognitive sequelae. Comparisons were analyzed using the Fisher exact test, Mann-Whitney U-test, linear mixed models, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and repeated-measures 1-way ANOVA.
RESULTS
Ten adults (mean ± SD [range] age 35 ± 15 [22–62] years) participated in this study. No patients died or exhibited serious adverse effects of systemic bevacizumab. At 3 months, 80% (95% CI 44%–98%) and 90% (95% CI 56%–100%) of patients demonstrated > 25% decrease in RN and vasogenic edema volume, respectively. At 12 months, RN volume decreased by 74% (median [range] 76% [53%–96%], p = 0.012), edema volume decreased by 50% (median [range] 70% [−11% to 83%], p = 0.086), and headache decreased by 84% (median [range] 92% [58%–100%], p = 0.022) among the 8 patients without RN recurrence. Only 1 (10%) patient was steroid dependent at the end of the trial. Scores on 12 of 16 (75%) neurocognitive indices increased, thereby supporting a pattern of cerebral white matter recovery. Two (20%) patients exhibited RN recurrence that required further treatment at 10 and 11 months, respectively, after bevacizumab infusion.
CONCLUSIONS
For the first time, to the authors’ knowledge, the authors demonstrated that a single low-dose targeted bevacizumab infusion resulted in durable clinical and imaging improvements in 80% of patients at 12 months after treatment without adverse events attributed to bevacizumab alone. These findings highlight that targeted bevacizumab may be an efficient one-time treatment for adults with brain RN. Further confirmation with a randomized controlled trial is needed to compare the intra-arterial approach with the conventional multicycle intravenous regimen.
Clinical trial registration no.: NCT02819479 (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shervin R. Dashti
- Cerebrovascular & Endovascular Neurosurgery Institute, Norton Neuroscience Institute, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, Kentucky
| | | | - Bradley S. Folley
- Norton Neuroscience Institute, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, Kentucky
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Jason P. Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Dong Y. Han
- Department of Neurology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Richard J. Kryscio
- Department of Statistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
- Sanders Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
- Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | | | | | - Brian M. Plato
- Headache Medicine, Norton Neuroscience Institute, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Renato V. La Rocca
- Precision Medicine, Norton Cancer Institute, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, Kentucky
- Kentucky Cancer Group, LLC, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Aaron C. Spalding
- Radiation Oncology, Norton Cancer Institute, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, Kentucky; and
| | - Tom L. Yao
- Cerebrovascular & Endovascular Neurosurgery Institute, Norton Neuroscience Institute, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Justin F. Fraser
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
- Department of Neurology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
- Departments of Radiology and
- Neuroscience, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
da Silva SC, da Silva Beggiora P, Catalão CHR, Dutra M, Matias Júnior I, Santos MV, Machado HR, da Silva Lopes L. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy associated with ventricular-subcutaneous shunt promotes neuroprotection in young hydrocephalic rats. Neuroscience 2022; 488:77-95. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2022.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
8
|
Lanier CM, Lecompte M, Glenn C, Hughes RT, Isom S, Jenkins W, Cramer CK, Chan M, Tatter SB, Laxton AW. A Single-Institution Retrospective Study of Patients Treated With Laser-Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Radiation Necrosis of the Brain. Cureus 2021; 13:e19967. [PMID: 34984127 PMCID: PMC8714182 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.19967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Object Laser-interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has been proposed as an alternative treatment to surgery for radiation necrosis (RN) in patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases. The present study sought to retrospectively analyze LITT outcomes in patients with RN from SRS. Methods This was a single-institution retrospective study of 30 patients treated from 2011-2018 with pathologically-proven RN after SRS for brain metastases (n=28) or proximally treated extracranial lesions treated with external beam radiotherapy (n=2). Same-day biopsy was performed in all cases. Patients were prospectively followed with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Brain (FACT-Br), EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) and clinical history and examination. Adjusted means, standard errors and tests comparing visits to pre-LITT were generated. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate time overall survival. Competing risk analysis was used to estimate cumulative incidence of LITT failure. Results In our patient population, median time from radiotherapy to LITT was 13.1 months. Median SRS dose and median LITT treatment target volume were 20 Gy (IQR 18-22) and 3.5 cc (IQR 2.2-4.6), respectively. Seventy-seven percent of our patients tapered off steroids within one month. There were only two instances of RN recurrence after LITT, with recurrence defined as recurrence of symptoms after initial improvement. These recurrences occurred at 1.9 and 3.4 months. The three-, six- and nine-month freedom from recurrence rates were 95.7%, 90.9%, and 90.9%. Median survival in our patient population with pathologically confirmed RN treated with LITT was 2.1 years. Regarding the quality of life questionnaires with which some patients were followed as part of different prospective studies, completion rates were 22/30 for FACT-Br, 16/30 for the EQ-5D and 8/30 for HVLT. Quality of life questionnaire results were overall stable from baseline. Mean FACT-Br scores were stable from baseline (17.9, 16.6, 21.4 and 22.8) to three months (18.8, 15.4, 18.4 and 23.4) (p=0.38, 0.53, 0.09 and 0.59). The mean EQ-5D Aggregate score was stable from baseline (7.1) to one month (7.6) (p=0.25). Mean HVLT-R Total Recall was stable from baseline (20.6) to three months (18.4) (p=0.09). There was a statistically significant decrease in mean Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score from baseline (84) to three-month follow-up (75) (p=0.03). Conclusions LITT represents a safe and durably effective treatment option for RN in the brain. Results demonstrate a median survival of 2.1 years from LITT with only two recurrences, both within four months of treatment and salvageable. Patient-reported outcomes showed no severe declines after LITT. Quality of life questionnaires demonstrated stable well-being and functionality from baseline. LITT should be considered for definitive treatment of RN, especially in cases where patients have significant side effects from standards medical therapies such as steroids or if steroids are minimally effective.
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Gliomas are common brain mass with a high mortality rate. Patients with gliomas have a severely bad outcome, with an average survive duration less 15 months because of high recurrent rate and being resistant to radio-therapy and chemistry drugs therapy. Hyperbaric oxygen is extensively taken as an adjuvant treatment for various disease conditions. To know the characteristics of hyperbaric oxygen as a remedy for gliomas, we find that, in general, hyperbaric oxygen shows an obviously positive effect on the treatment of gliomas, and it can also relieve the complications caused by postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy of gliomas. Whereas, several researches have shown that hyperbaric oxygen promotes glioma progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Jie Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery & Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Jia-Sheng Ding
- Department of Neurosurgery & Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Qing Sun
- Department of Neurosurgery & Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Xiang Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery & Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Gang Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery & Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Puthenpura V, DeNunzio NJ, Zeng X, Giantsoudi D, Aboian M, Ebb D, Kahle KT, Yock TI, Marks AM. Radiation Necrosis with Proton Therapy in a Patient with Aarskog-Scott Syndrome and Medulloblastoma. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:58-65. [PMID: 35127977 PMCID: PMC8768897 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-21-00013.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Medulloblastoma is known to be associated with multiple cancer-predisposition syndromes. In this article, we explore a possible association among a patient's Aarskog-Scott syndrome, development of medulloblastoma, and subsequent brainstem radiation necrosis. Case Presentation A 5-year-old male with Aarskog-Scott syndrome initially presented to his pediatrician with morning emesis, gait instability, and truncal weakness. He was ultimately found to have a posterior fossa tumor with pathology consistent with group 3 medulloblastoma. After receiving a gross total resection and standard proton beam radiation therapy with concurrent vincristine, he was noted to develop brainstem radiation necrosis, for which he underwent therapy with high-dose dexamethasone, bevacizumab, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy with radiographic improvement and clinical stabilization. Conclusion Based on several possible pathologic correlates in the FDG1 pathway, there exists a potential association between this patient's Aarskog-Scott syndrome and medulloblastoma, which needs to be investigated further. In patients with underlying, rare genetic syndromes, further caution should be taken when evaluating chemotherapy and radiation dosimetry planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vidya Puthenpura
- Section of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Nicholas J. DeNunzio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Xue Zeng
- Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Drosoula Giantsoudi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mariam Aboian
- Section of Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - David Ebb
- Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kristopher T. Kahle
- Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Torunn I. Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Asher M. Marks
- Section of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Patel S, Vargo JA, Olson A, Mahajan A. Supportive care for toxicities in children undergoing radiation therapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68 Suppl 2:e28597. [PMID: 33818886 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2020] [Revised: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) is an integral part of the management of many pediatric tumors; however, it is associated with both acute and permanent adverse events that can significantly impact a child's quality of life, lead to treatment delays, and potentially affect outcomes of cancer therapy. Prevention, early detection, and optimal management of these adverse effects will help reduce their impact on the patients' quality of life and overall well-being. Unfortunately, there has not been a coordinated effort to study the etiology, evaluate risk factors, and explore novel treatments for these conditions. Studies of supportive care for children undergoing RT are often small and uncontrolled. This review will focus on the impact of irradiation on the different organ systems and their current management. Further studies are required to improve our understanding of the contributing factors and explore novel treatment options for these adverse effects and to enable children and their families to better cope with some of the unavoidable toxicities following multimodality therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samir Patel
- Divisions of Radiation Oncology and Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, University of Alberta, Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Canada
| | - John Austin Vargo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Adam Olson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburg, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Baroni LV, Alderete D, Solano-Paez P, Rugilo C, Freytes C, Laughlin S, Fonseca A, Bartels U, Tabori U, Bouffet E, Huang A, Laperriere N, Tsang DS, Sumerauer D, Kyncl M, Ondrová B, Malalasekera VS, Hansford JR, Zápotocký M, Ramaswamy V. Bevacizumab for pediatric radiation necrosis. Neurooncol Pract 2020; 7:409-414. [PMID: 32765892 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npz072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Radiation necrosis is a frequent complication occurring after the treatment of pediatric brain tumors; however, treatment options remain a challenge. Bevacizumab is an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody that has been shown in small adult cohorts to confer a benefit, specifically a reduction in steroid usage, but its use in children has not been well described. Methods We describe our experience with bevacizumab use for symptomatic radiation necrosis at 5 institutions including patients treated after both initial irradiation and reirradiation. Results We identified 26 patients treated with bevacizumab for symptomatic radiation necrosis, with a wide range of underlying diagnoses. The average age at diagnosis of radiation necrosis was 10.7 years, with a median time between the last dose of radiation and the presentation of radiation necrosis of 3.8 months (range, 0.6-110 months). Overall, we observed that 13 of 26 patients (50%) had an objective clinical improvement, with only 1 patient suffering from significant hypertension. Radiological improvement, defined as reduced T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery signal and mass effect, was observed in 50% of patients; however, this did not completely overlap with clinical response. Both early and late radiation necrosis responded equally well to bevacizumab therapy. Overall, bevacizumab was very well tolerated, permitting a reduction of corticosteroid dose and/or duration in the majority of patients. Conclusions Bevacizumab appears to be effective and well-tolerated in children as treatment for symptomatic radiation necrosis and warrants more robust study in the context of controlled clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorena V Baroni
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Service of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital JP Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, Programme in Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel Alderete
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Service of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital JP Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Palma Solano-Paez
- Service of Pediatric Oncology, Hospital Infantil Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
| | - Carlos Rugilo
- Service of Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital JP Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Candela Freytes
- Service of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital JP Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Suzanne Laughlin
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Adriana Fonseca
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ute Bartels
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Uri Tabori
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Eric Bouffet
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Annie Huang
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Normand Laperriere
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Derek S Tsang
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David Sumerauer
- Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Second Medical School, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Kyncl
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Motol, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Jordan R Hansford
- Children's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,Division of Cancer, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michal Zápotocký
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vijay Ramaswamy
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, Programme in Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mendel JT, Jaster AW, Yu FF, Morris LC, Lynch PT, Shah BR, Agarwal A, Timmerman RD, Nedzi LA, Raj KM. Fundamentals of Radiation Oncology for Neurologic Imaging. Radiographics 2020; 40:827-858. [PMID: 32216705 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2020190138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Although the physical and biologic principles of radiation therapy have remained relatively unchanged, a technologic renaissance has led to continuous and ever-changing growth in the field of radiation oncology. As a result, medical devices, techniques, and indications have changed considerably during the past 20-30 years. For example, advances in CT and MRI have revolutionized the treatment planning process for a variety of central nervous system diseases, including primary and metastatic tumors, vascular malformations, and inflammatory diseases. The resultant improved ability to delineate normal from abnormal tissue has enabled radiation oncologists to achieve more precise targeting and helped to mitigate treatment-related complications. Nevertheless, posttreatment complications still occur and can pose a diagnostic challenge for radiologists. These complications can be divided into acute, early-delayed, and late-delayed complications on the basis of the time that they manifest after radiation therapy and include leukoencephalopathy, vascular complications, and secondary neoplasms. The different irradiation technologies and applications of these technologies in the brain, current concepts used in treatment planning, and essential roles of the radiation oncologist in the setting of brain disease are reviewed. In addition, relevant imaging findings that can be used to delineate the extent of disease before treatment, and the expected posttreatment imaging changes are described. Common and uncommon complications related to radiation therapy and the associated imaging manifestations also are discussed. Familiarity with these entities may aid the radiologist in making the diagnosis and help guide appropriate management. ©RSNA, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Travis Mendel
- From the Departments of Radiation Oncology (J.T.M., P.T.L., R.D.T., L.A.N.) and Radiology (A.W.J., F.F.Y., L.C.M., B.R.S., A.A., K.M.R.), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390
| | - Adam W Jaster
- From the Departments of Radiation Oncology (J.T.M., P.T.L., R.D.T., L.A.N.) and Radiology (A.W.J., F.F.Y., L.C.M., B.R.S., A.A., K.M.R.), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390
| | - Fang F Yu
- From the Departments of Radiation Oncology (J.T.M., P.T.L., R.D.T., L.A.N.) and Radiology (A.W.J., F.F.Y., L.C.M., B.R.S., A.A., K.M.R.), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390
| | - Lee C Morris
- From the Departments of Radiation Oncology (J.T.M., P.T.L., R.D.T., L.A.N.) and Radiology (A.W.J., F.F.Y., L.C.M., B.R.S., A.A., K.M.R.), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390
| | - Patrick T Lynch
- From the Departments of Radiation Oncology (J.T.M., P.T.L., R.D.T., L.A.N.) and Radiology (A.W.J., F.F.Y., L.C.M., B.R.S., A.A., K.M.R.), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390
| | - Bhavya R Shah
- From the Departments of Radiation Oncology (J.T.M., P.T.L., R.D.T., L.A.N.) and Radiology (A.W.J., F.F.Y., L.C.M., B.R.S., A.A., K.M.R.), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390
| | - Amit Agarwal
- From the Departments of Radiation Oncology (J.T.M., P.T.L., R.D.T., L.A.N.) and Radiology (A.W.J., F.F.Y., L.C.M., B.R.S., A.A., K.M.R.), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390
| | - Robert D Timmerman
- From the Departments of Radiation Oncology (J.T.M., P.T.L., R.D.T., L.A.N.) and Radiology (A.W.J., F.F.Y., L.C.M., B.R.S., A.A., K.M.R.), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390
| | - Lucien A Nedzi
- From the Departments of Radiation Oncology (J.T.M., P.T.L., R.D.T., L.A.N.) and Radiology (A.W.J., F.F.Y., L.C.M., B.R.S., A.A., K.M.R.), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390
| | - Karuna M Raj
- From the Departments of Radiation Oncology (J.T.M., P.T.L., R.D.T., L.A.N.) and Radiology (A.W.J., F.F.Y., L.C.M., B.R.S., A.A., K.M.R.), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tejada S, Batle JM, Ferrer MD, Busquets-Cortés C, Monserrat-Mesquida M, Nabavi SM, Del Mar Bibiloni M, Pons A, Sureda A. Therapeutic Effects of Hyperbaric Oxygen in the Process of Wound Healing. Curr Pharm Des 2020; 25:1682-1693. [PMID: 31269879 DOI: 10.2174/1381612825666190703162648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Accepted: 06/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Chronic and non-healing wounds, especially diabetic foot ulcers and radiation injuries, imply remarkable morbidity with a significant effect on the quality of life and a high sanitary cost. The management of these wounds requires complex actions such as surgical debris, antibiotic treatment, dressings and even revascularization. These wounds are characterized by poor oxygen supply resulting in inadequate oxygenation of the affected tissue. The adjuvant treatment with hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) may increase tissue oxygenation favoring the healing of wounds which do not respond to the usual clinical care. The increase in the partial pressure of oxygen contributes to cover the energy demands necessary for the healing process and reduces the incidence of infections. Moreover, the increase in oxygen leads to the production of reactive species with hormetic activity, acting on signaling pathways that modulate the synthesis of inflammation mediators, antioxidants and growth factors which can contribute to the healing process. Studies performed with cell cultures and in animal models seem to demonstrate the beneficial effects of HBOT. However, clinical trials do not show such conclusive results; thus, additional randomized placebo-controlled studies are necessary to determine the real efficacy of HBOT and the mechanism of action for various types of wounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Tejada
- Research Group on Community Nutrition and Oxidative Stress, University of Balearic Islands & CIBEROBN (Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition), E-07122, Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain
| | - Juan M Batle
- MEDISUB Recerca (Institut de Recerca Hiperbarica), Cami d´Aucanada 52, E-07410 Pto. de Alcudia, Balearic Islands, Spain
| | - Miguel D Ferrer
- Research Group on Community Nutrition and Oxidative Stress, University of Balearic Islands & CIBEROBN (Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition), E-07122, Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain
| | - Carla Busquets-Cortés
- Research Group on Community Nutrition and Oxidative Stress, University of Balearic Islands & CIBEROBN (Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition), E-07122, Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain
| | - Margalida Monserrat-Mesquida
- Research Group on Community Nutrition and Oxidative Stress, University of Balearic Islands & CIBEROBN (Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition), E-07122, Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain
| | - Seyed M Nabavi
- Applied Biotechnology Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, 14359-16471 Tehran, Iran
| | - Maria Del Mar Bibiloni
- Research Group on Community Nutrition and Oxidative Stress, University of Balearic Islands & CIBEROBN (Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition), E-07122, Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain
| | - Antoni Pons
- Research Group on Community Nutrition and Oxidative Stress, University of Balearic Islands & CIBEROBN (Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition), E-07122, Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain
| | - Antoni Sureda
- Research Group on Community Nutrition and Oxidative Stress, University of Balearic Islands & CIBEROBN (Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition), E-07122, Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Palmer JD, Trifiletti DM, Gondi V, Chan M, Minniti G, Rusthoven CG, Schild SE, Mishra MV, Bovi J, Williams N, Lustberg M, Brown PD, Rao G, Roberge D. Multidisciplinary patient-centered management of brain metastases and future directions. Neurooncol Adv 2020; 2:vdaa034. [PMID: 32793882 PMCID: PMC7415255 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence of brain metastasis is increasing as improvements in systemic therapy lead to increased survival. This provides new and challenging clinical decisions for patients who are trying to balance the risk of recurrence or progression with treatment-related side effects, and it requires appropriate management strategies from multidisciplinary teams. Improvements in prognostic assessment and systemic therapy with increasing activity in the brain allow for individualized care to better guide the use of local therapies and/or systemic therapy. Here, we review the current landscape of brain-directed therapy for the treatment of brain metastasis in the context of recent improved systemic treatment options. We also discuss emerging treatment strategies including targeted therapies for patients with actionable mutations, immunotherapy, modern whole-brain radiation therapy, radiosurgery, surgery, and clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Daniel M Trifiletti
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Vinai Gondi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Radiation Oncology Consultants LLC, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center Warrenville, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Michael Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, San Pietro Hospital FBF, Rome, Italy
| | - Chad G Rusthoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Mark V Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Joseph Bovi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Nicole Williams
- Department of Medical Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Maryam Lustberg
- Department of Medical Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ganesh Rao
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David Roberge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l’ Université de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Shah A, Downey B, Menacho ST. Viable treatment options for patients with symptomatic radiation necrosis treated with stereotactic radiosurgery and immunotherapy. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2019; 184:105444. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2019] [Accepted: 07/13/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|