1
|
Kahl KH, Krauss PE, Neu M, Maurer CJ, Schill-Reiner S, Roushan Z, Laukmanis E, Dobner C, Janzen T, Balagiannis N, Sommer B, Stüben G, Shiban E. Intraoperative radiotherapy after neurosurgical resection of brain metastases as institutional standard treatment- update of the oncological outcome form a single center cohort after 117 procedures. J Neurooncol 2024; 169:187-193. [PMID: 38963657 PMCID: PMC11269407 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04691-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is the predominant method for the irradiation of resection cavities after resection of brain metastases (BM). Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with 50 kV x-rays is an alternative way to irradiate the resection cavity focally. We have already reported the outcome of our first 40 IORT patients treated until 2020. Since then, IORT has become the predominant cavity treatment in our center due to patients´ choice. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of all patients who underwent resection of BM and IORT between 2013 and August 2023 at Augsburg University Medical Center (UKA). RESULTS We identified 105 patients with 117 resected BM treated with 50 kV x-ray IORT. Median diameter of the resected metastases was 3.1 cm (range 1.3 - 7.0 cm). Median applied dose was 20 Gy. All patients received standardized follow-up (FU) including three-monthly MRI of the brain. Mean FU was 14 months, with a median MRI FU for patients alive of nine months. Median overall survival (OS) of all treated patients was 18.2 months (estimated 1-year OS 57.7%). The observed local control (LC) rate of the resection cavity was 90.5% (estimated 1-year LC 84.2%). Distant brain control (DC) was 61.9% (estimated 1-year DC 47.9%). Only 16.2% of all patients needed WBI in the further course of disease. The observed radio necrosis rate was 2.6%. CONCLUSION After 117 procedures IORT still appears to be a safe and appealing way to perform cavity RT after neurosurgical resection of BM with low toxicity and excellent LC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus-Henning Kahl
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio- Oncology, University Medical Center Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
| | - Philipp E Krauss
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Maria Neu
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio- Oncology, University Medical Center Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Christoph J Maurer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Sabine Schill-Reiner
- Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, University Medical Center Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Zoha Roushan
- Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, University Medical Center Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Eva Laukmanis
- Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, University Medical Center Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Christian Dobner
- Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, University Medical Center Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Tilman Janzen
- Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, University Medical Center Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Balagiannis
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio- Oncology, University Medical Center Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Björn Sommer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Georg Stüben
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio- Oncology, University Medical Center Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ehab Shiban
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Palavani LB, de Barros Oliveira L, Reis PA, Batista S, Santana LS, de Freitas Martins LP, Rabelo NN, Bertani R, Welling LC, Figueiredo EG, Paiva WS, Neville IS. Efficacy and Safety of Intraoperative Radiotherapy for High-Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Neurosurg Rev 2024; 47:47. [PMID: 38221545 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-02279-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are aggressive tumors of the central nervous system that cause significant morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in surgery and radiation therapy (RT), HGG still has a high incidence of recurrence and treatment failure. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach to achieve local tumor control while sparing normal brain tissue from radiation-induced damage. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the use of IORT for HGG. Eligible studies were included based on specific criteria, and data were independently extracted. Outcomes of interest included complications, IORT failure, survival rates at 12 and 24 months, and mortality. RESULTS Sixteen studies comprising 436 patients were included. The overall complication rate after IORT was 17%, with significant heterogeneity observed. The IORT failure rate was 77%, while the survival rates at 12 and 24 months were 74% and 24%, respectively. The mortality rate was 62%. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis suggests that IORT may be a promising adjuvant treatment for selected patients with HGG. Despite the high rate of complications and treatment failures, the survival outcomes were comparable or even superior to conventional methods. However, the limitations of the study, such as the lack of a control group and small sample sizes, warrant further investigation through prospective randomized controlled trials to better understand the specific patient populations that may benefit most from IORT. However, the limitations of the study, such as the lack of a control group and small sample sizes, warrant further investigation. Notably, the ongoing RP3 trial (NCT02685605) is currently underway, with the aim of providing a more comprehensive understanding of IORT. Moreover, future research should focus on managing complications associated with IORT to improve its safety and efficacy in treating HGG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Pedro Abrahão Reis
- Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Savio Batista
- Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
| | | | | | - Nicollas Nunes Rabelo
- Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Raphael Bertani
- Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo
- Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Wellingson S Paiva
- Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Iuri Santana Neville
- Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo - Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bao H, Ai S, Wang G, Yi L, Lai J, Wang S, Lv Z, Li C, Liu Q, Zhao X, Wu C, Liu C, Mi S, Sun X, Hao C, Liang P. Intraoperative radiotherapy in recurrent IDH-wildtype glioblastoma with gross total resection: A single-center retrospective study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2024; 236:108103. [PMID: 38199118 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.108103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Isocitrate dehydrogenase-wildtype (IDHwt) glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most aggressive primary brain tumors. The recurrence of GBM is almost inevitable. As an adjuvant option to surgery, intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is gaining increasing attention in the treatment of glioma. This study is aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of IORT on recurrent IDHwt GBM. METHODS In total, 34 recurrent IDHwt GBM patients who received a second surgery were included in the analysis (17 in the surgery group and 17 in the surgery + IORT group). RESULTS The progression-free survival and overall survival after the second surgery were defined as PFS2 and OS2, respectively. The median PFS2 was 7.3 months (95% CI: 6.3-10.5) and 10.6 months (95% CI: 9.3-14.6) for those patients who received surgery and surgery + IORT, respectively. Patients in the surgery + IORT group also had a longer OS2 (12.8 months, 95% CI: 11.4-17.2) than those in the surgery group (9.3 months, 95% CI: 8.9-12.9). The Kaplan-Meier survival curves, analyzed by log-rank test, revealed a statistically significant difference in PFS2 and OS2 between both groups, suggesting that IORT plays an active role in the observed benefits for PFS2 and OS2. The effects of IORT on PFS2 and OS2 were further confirmed by multivariate Cox hazards regression analysis. Two patients in the surgery group developed distant glioma metastases, and no radiation-related complications were observed in the IORT group. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that low-dose IORT may improve the prognosis of recurrent IDHwt GBM patients. Future prospective large-scale studies are needed to validate the efficacy and safety of IORT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongbo Bao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China; Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Siqi Ai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China; Department of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Gang Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Liye Yi
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Jiacheng Lai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Shuai Wang
- Department of Imaging Center, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Zhonghua Lv
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Chenlong Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Qing Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Xinyu Zhao
- Department of Radiotherapy, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Chou Wu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Chang Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Shan Mi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Xiaoyang Sun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Chuncheng Hao
- Department of Radiotherapy, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
| | - Peng Liang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Krauss P, Kahl KH, Bonk MN, Wolfert C, Sommer B, Stueben G, Shiban E. Intraoperative radiotherapy after resection of brain metastases located in the posterior fossa. Analysis of postoperative morbidity and mortality in a single center cohort. J Clin Neurosci 2023; 118:1-6. [PMID: 37832264 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2023.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In order to improve surgical outcome and accelerate the adjuvant oncologic therapy, intraoperative Radiotherapy (IORT) has become a treatment option in oncologic surgery for various diseases including glioma and brain metastasis (BM). BMs are often located in the cranial posterior fossa (PF) requiring specific surgical considerations due to its complex anatomy. Up until now, data on IORT for BMs is limited and detailed description in the use of IORT for lesions in the PF is lacking. Our aim is to provide more insight into this emerging treatment strategy. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of patients receiving surgery for BMs and undergoing IORT at our institution. Each patient was discussed at the interdisciplinary tumor board decision before the intervention. Patient characteristics, functional status (Karnofsky Performance Score, KPS) before and after surgery, disease (recursive partitioning analysis, lesion size) and operative parameters were analyzed. Adverse events (AE) were recorded up until 30 days after the intervention and rated according to the Clavien Dindo Rating scale. RESULTS Nine patients (5 female) were included. None underwent prior radiotherapy (RT). Mean age was 66 ± 11 years. Preoperative median KPS was 80%. Mean BM diameter was 3.2 ± 0.9 cm. There was no statistically significant deterioration of the functional status after the intervention. Two patients experienced AEs with both of them needing revision surgery. CONCLUSION Surgery for BMs with IORT in the PF seems safe and feasible. Further studies are needed to evaluate the influence of IORT on long-term outcome after BM surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Krauss
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
| | - Klaus Henning Kahl
- Department of Radiooncology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niklas Bonk
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Christina Wolfert
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Bjoern Sommer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Georg Stueben
- Department of Radiooncology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ehab Shiban
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstrasse 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dejonckheere CS, Layer JP, Hamed M, Layer K, Glasmacher A, Friker LL, Potthoff AL, Zeyen T, Scafa D, Koch D, Garbe S, Holz JA, Kugel F, Grimmer M, Schmeel FC, Gielen GH, Forstbauer H, Vatter H, Herrlinger U, Giordano FA, Schneider M, Schmeel LC, Sarria GR. Intraoperative or postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases: time to systemic treatment onset and other patient-relevant outcomes. J Neurooncol 2023; 164:683-691. [PMID: 37812290 PMCID: PMC10589145 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04464-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has become a viable treatment option for resectable brain metastases (BMs). As data on local control and radiation necrosis rates are maturing, we focus on meaningful secondary endpoints such as time to next treatment (TTNT), duration of postoperative corticosteroid treatment, and in-hospital time. METHODS Patients prospectively recruited within an IORT study registry between November 2020 and June 2023 were compared with consecutive patients receiving adjuvant stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) of the resection cavity within the same time frame. TTNT was defined as the number of days between BM resection and start of the next extracranial oncological therapy (systemic treatment, surgery, or radiotherapy) for each of the groups. RESULTS Of 95 BM patients screened, IORT was feasible in 84 cases (88%) and ultimately performed in 64 (67%). The control collective consisted of 53 SRT patients. There were no relevant differences in clinical baseline features. Mean TTNT (range) was 36 (9 - 94) days for IORT patients versus 52 (11 - 126) days for SRT patients (p = 0.01). Mean duration of postoperative corticosteroid treatment was similar (8 days; p = 0.83), as was mean postoperative in-hospital time (11 versus 12 days; p = 0.97). Mean total in-hospital time for BM treatment (in- and out-patient days) was 11 days for IORT versus 19 days for SRT patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION IORT for BMs results in faster completion of interdisciplinary treatment when compared to adjuvant SRT, without increasing corticosteroid intake or prolonging in-hospital times. A randomised phase III trial will determine the clinical effects of shorter TTNT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cas S Dejonckheere
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
| | - Julian P Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Motaz Hamed
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Katharina Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Andrea Glasmacher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Lea L Friker
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Germany
- Institute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Zeyen
- Division of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - David Koch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Stephan Garbe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jasmin A Holz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Fabian Kugel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Molina Grimmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Gerrit H Gielen
- Institute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Hartmut Vatter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Ulrich Herrlinger
- Division of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Matthias Schneider
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Diehl CD, Giordano FA, Grosu AL, Ille S, Kahl KH, Onken J, Rieken S, Sarria GR, Shiban E, Wagner A, Beck J, Brehmer S, Ganslandt O, Hamed M, Meyer B, Münter M, Raabe A, Rohde V, Schaller K, Schilling D, Schneider M, Sperk E, Thomé C, Vajkoczy P, Vatter H, Combs SE. Opportunities and Alternatives of Modern Radiation Oncology and Surgery for the Management of Resectable Brain Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3670. [PMID: 37509330 PMCID: PMC10377800 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Postsurgical radiotherapy (RT) has been early proven to prevent local tumor recurrence, initially performed with whole brain RT (WBRT). Subsequent to disadvantageous cognitive sequalae for the patient and the broad distribution of modern linear accelerators, focal irradiation of the tumor has omitted WBRT in most cases. In many studies, the effectiveness of local RT of the resection cavity, either as single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or hypo-fractionated stereotactic RT (hFSRT), has been demonstrated to be effective and safe. However, whereas prospective high-level incidence is still lacking on which dose and fractionation scheme is the best choice for the patient, further ablative techniques have come into play. Neoadjuvant SRS (N-SRS) prior to resection combines straightforward target delineation with an accelerated post-surgical phase, allowing an earlier start of systemic treatment or rehabilitation as indicated. In addition, low-energy intraoperative RT (IORT) on the surgical bed has been introduced as another alternative to external beam RT, offering sterilization of the cavity surface with steep dose gradients towards the healthy brain. This consensus paper summarizes current local treatment strategies for resectable brain metastases regarding available data and patient-centered decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian D Diehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 München, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 München, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Medical Faculty, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Ille
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany
| | - Klaus-Henning Kahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Julia Onken
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Niedersachsen (CCC-N), 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Ehab Shiban
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Arthur Wagner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany
| | - Jürgen Beck
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Stefanie Brehmer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Oliver Ganslandt
- Neurosurgical Clinic, Klinikum Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Motaz Hamed
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 München, Germany
| | - Marc Münter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Stuttgart Katharinenhospital, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Andreas Raabe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Veit Rohde
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Karl Schaller
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Geneva Medical Center & Faculty of Medicine, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Daniela Schilling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 München, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Schneider
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Elena Sperk
- Mannheim Cancer Center, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Claudius Thomé
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Hartmut Vatter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, 81675 München, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Carconi C, Cerreti M, Roberto M, Arrivi G, D'Ambrosio G, De Felice F, Di Civita MA, Iafrate F, Lucatelli P, Magliocca FM, Picchetto A, Picone V, Catalano C, Cortesi E, Tombolini V, Mazzuca F, Tomao S. The Management of Oligometastatic Disease in Colorectal Cancer: Present Strategies and Future Perspectives. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 186:103990. [PMID: 37061075 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.103990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Oligometastatic disease has been described as an intermediate clinical state between localized cancer and systemically metastasized disease. Recent clinical studies have shown prolonged survival when aggressive locoregional approaches are added to systemic therapies in patients with oligometastases. The aim of this review is to outline the newest options to treat oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), also considering its molecular patterns. We present an overview of the available local treatment strategies, including surgical procedures, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), thermal ablation, as well as trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT). Moreover, since imaging methods provide crucial information for the early diagnosis and management of oligometastatic CRC, we discuss the role of modern radiologic techniques in selecting patients that are amenable to potentially curative locoregional treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catia Carconi
- Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Micaela Cerreti
- Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Michela Roberto
- UOC Oncologia A, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
| | - Giulia Arrivi
- Oncology Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giancarlo D'Ambrosio
- Department of General Surgery, Surgical Specialties and Organ Transplantation, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca De Felice
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Mattia Alberto Di Civita
- UOC Oncologia A, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Franco Iafrate
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Pierleone Lucatelli
- Vascular and Interventional radiology Unit, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Massimo Magliocca
- Vascular and Interventional radiology Unit, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Picchetto
- Emergency Department, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Picone
- UOC Oncologia B, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Catalano
- Vascular and Interventional radiology Unit, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Cortesi
- UOC Oncologia B, Department of radiological, Oncological and Anathomo-patological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Tombolini
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Mazzuca
- Oncology Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Silverio Tomao
- Oncology Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lozares-Cordero S, Ibáñez-Carreras R, García-Barrios A, Castro-Moreno R, González-Rodríguez A, Sánchez-Casi M, Campos-Boned A, Gandía-Martínez A, Antonio Font-Gómez J, Jiménez-Puertas S, Villa-Gazulla D, Díez-Chamarro J, Hernández-Hernández M, González-Pérez V, Cisneros-Gimeno AI. End-To-End Procedure For IORT in Brain Metastases and Film Dosimetry. J Med Phys 2023; 48:175-180. [PMID: 37576088 PMCID: PMC10419752 DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_18_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 05/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The study is intended to perform an end-to-end test of the entire intraoperative process using cadaver heads. A simulation of tumor removal was performed, followed by irradiation of the bed and measurement of absorbed doses with radiochromic films. Materials and Methods Low-energy X-ray intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) was used for irradiation. A computed tomography study was performed at each site and the absorbed doses calculated by the treatment planning system, as well as absorbed doses with radiochromic films, were studied. Results The absorbed doses in the organs at risk (OAR) were evaluated in each case, obtaining maximum doses within the tolerance limits. The absorbed doses in the target were verified and the deviations were <1%. Conclusions These tests demonstrated that this comprehensive procedure is a reproducible quality assurance tool which allows continuous assessment of the dosimetric and geometric accuracy of clinical brain IORT treatments. Furthermore, the absorbed doses measured in both target and OAR are optimal for these treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Lozares-Cordero
- Department of Physics and Radiation Protection, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Reyes Ibáñez-Carreras
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Alberto García-Barrios
- Department of Anatomy and Histology, School of Medicine, University of Zaragoza, Valencia, Spain
| | - Raquel Castro-Moreno
- Department of Physics and Radiation Protection, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | - Marta Sánchez-Casi
- Department of Physics and Radiation Protection, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Arantxa Campos-Boned
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Almudena Gandía-Martínez
- Department of Physics and Radiation Protection, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - José Antonio Font-Gómez
- Department of Physics and Radiation Protection, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Sara Jiménez-Puertas
- Department of Physics and Radiation Protection, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - David Villa-Gazulla
- Department of Physics and Radiation Protection, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Javier Díez-Chamarro
- Department of Physics and Radiation Protection, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
de Castro DG, Sanematsu PI, Pellizzon ACA, Suzuki SH, Fogaroli RC, Dias JES, Gondim GRM, Estrada DA, Silva MLG, Rassi MS, Chen MJ, Giacomelli R, Ramos H, Neto ES, Abrahão CH, Coelho TM, Yu LS, de Queiroz Tannous C, Calsavara VF, Giordano FA, de Oliveira JG. Intraoperative radiotherapy for brain metastases: first-stage results of a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial. J Neurooncol 2023; 162:211-215. [PMID: 36826700 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04266-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Focal stereotactic radiosurgery to the surgical cavity lowers local recurrence after resection of brain metastases (BM). To evaluate local control (LC) and brain disease control (BDC) after intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for resected BM. METHODS Adult patients with completely resected single supratentorial BM were recruited and underwent IORT to the cavity with a prescribed dose of 18 Gy to 1 mm-depth. Primary endpoints were actuarial LC and BDC. Local failure (LF) and distant brain failure (DBF), with death as a competing risk, were estimated. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and incidence of radiation necrosis (RN). Simon's two-stage design was used and estimated an accrual of 10 patients for the first-stage analysis and a LC higher than 63% to proceed to second stage. We report the final analysis of the first stage. RESULTS Between June 2019 to November 2020, 10 patients were accrued. Median clinical and imaging FU was 11.2 and 9.7 months, respectively. Median LC was not reached and median BDC was 5 months. The 6-month and 12-month LC was 87.5%. The 6-month and 12-month BDC was 39% and 13%, respectively. Incidence of LF at 6 and 12 months was 10% and of DBF at 6 and 12 months was 50% and 70%, respectively. Median OS was not reached. The 6-month and 12-month OS was 80%. One patient had asymptomatic RN. CONCLUSION IORT for completely resected BM is associated with a potential high local control and low risk of RN, reaching the pre-specified criteria to proceed to second stage and warranting further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Ricardo Cesar Fogaroli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, 01509-001, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Marcio Saquy Rassi
- Department of Neurosurgery, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Michael Jenwei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, 01509-001, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Richard Giacomelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Henderson Ramos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, 01509-001, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Elson Santos Neto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, 01509-001, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Liao Shin Yu
- Department of Imaging, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Frank Anton Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, DKFZ-Hector Cancer Institute, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jean Gonçalves de Oliveira
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lehrer EJ, Kowalchuk RO, Ruiz-Garcia H, Merrell KW, Brown PD, Palmer JD, Burri SH, Sheehan JP, Quninoes-Hinojosa A, Trifiletti DM. Preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of brain metastases and gliomas. Front Surg 2022; 9:972727. [PMID: 36353610 PMCID: PMC9637863 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.972727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is the delivery of a high dose ionizing radiation in a highly conformal manner, which allows for significant sparing of nearby healthy tissues. It is typically delivered in 1-5 sessions and has demonstrated safety and efficacy across multiple intracranial neoplasms and functional disorders. In the setting of brain metastases, postoperative and definitive SRS has demonstrated favorable rates of tumor control and improved cognitive preservation compared to conventional whole brain radiation therapy. However, the risk of local failure and treatment-related complications (e.g. radiation necrosis) markedly increases with larger postoperative treatment volumes. Additionally, the risk of leptomeningeal disease is significantly higher in patients treated with postoperative SRS. In the setting of high grade glioma, preclinical reports have suggested that preoperative SRS may enhance anti-tumor immunity as compared to postoperative radiotherapy. In addition to potentially permitting smaller target volumes, tissue analysis may permit characterization of DNA repair pathways and tumor microenvironment changes in response to SRS, which may be used to further tailor therapy and identify novel therapeutic targets. Building on the work from preoperative SRS for brain metastases and preclinical work for high grade gliomas, further exploration of this treatment paradigm in the latter is warranted. Presently, there are prospective early phase clinical trials underway investigating the role of preoperative SRS in the management of high grade gliomas. In the forthcoming sections, we review the biologic rationale for preoperative SRS, as well as pertinent preclinical and clinical data, including ongoing and planned prospective clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J. Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Roman O. Kowalchuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Henry Ruiz-Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Kenneth W. Merrell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Paul D. Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Joshua D. Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Stuart H. Burri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, United States
| | - Jason P. Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | | | - Daniel M. Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States,Correspondence: Daniel M. Trifiletti
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Steininger K, Kahl KH, Konietzko I, Wolfert C, Motov S, Krauß PE, Bröcheler T, Hadrawa M, Sommer B, Stüben G, Shiban E. Intraoperative radiotherapy during awake craniotomies: preliminary results of a single-center case series. Neurosurg Rev 2022; 45:3657-3663. [PMID: 35881316 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-022-01838-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Awake craniotomies are performed to avoid postoperative neurological deficits when resecting lesions in the eloquent cortex, especially the speech area. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has recently focused on optimizing the oncological treatment of primary malignant brain tumors and metastases. Herein, for the first time, we present preliminary results of IORT in the setting of awake craniotomies. From 2021 to 2022, all patients undergoing awake craniotomies for tumor resection combined with IORT were analyzed retrospectively. Demographical and clinical data, operative procedure, and treatment-related complications were evaluated. Five patients were identified (age (mean ± standard deviation (SD): 65 ± 13.5 years (y)). A solid left frontal metastasis was detected in the first patient (female, 49 y). The second patient (male, 72 y) presented with a solid metastasis on the left parietal lobe. The third patient (male, 52 y) was diagnosed with a left temporoparietal metastasis. Patient four (male, 74 y) was diagnosed with a high-grade glioma on the left frontal lobe. A metastasis on the left temporooccipital lobe was detected in the fifth patient (male, 78 y). After awake craniotomy and macroscopic complete tumor resection, intraoperative tumor bed irradiation was carried out with 50 kV x-rays and a total of 20 Gy for 16.7 ± 2.5 min. During a mean follow-up of 6.3 ± 2.6 months, none of the patients developed any surgery- or IORT-related complications or disabling permanent neurological deficits. Intraoperative radiotherapy in combination with awake craniotomy seems to be feasible and safe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Steininger
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
| | - K H Kahl
- Department of Radiation Therapy, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - I Konietzko
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany
| | - C Wolfert
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany
| | - S Motov
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany
| | - P E Krauß
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany
| | - T Bröcheler
- Department of Anesthesia, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - M Hadrawa
- Department of Anesthesia, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - B Sommer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany
| | - G Stüben
- Department of Radiation Therapy, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - E Shiban
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hamed M, Potthoff AL, Layer JP, Koch D, Borger V, Heimann M, Scafa D, Sarria GR, Holz JA, Schmeel FC, Radbruch A, Güresir E, Schäfer N, Schuss P, Garbe S, Giordano FA, Herrlinger U, Vatter H, Schmeel LC, Schneider M. Benchmarking Safety Indicators of Surgical Treatment of Brain Metastases Combined with Intraoperative Radiotherapy: Results of Prospective Observational Study with Comparative Matched-Pair Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061515. [PMID: 35326666 PMCID: PMC8946541 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 03/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Patients with brain metastasis (BM) are at advanced stages of metastatic cancer, and surgical resection is often required in order to avoid severe neurologic deficits. After surgery, patients are usually committed to postoperative radiotherapy. In recent years, intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has been proposed as an alternative to conventional postsurgical radiation approaches. This possibility has several advantages, e.g., as IORT is administered only once during the surgical procedure, patients do not have to attend several radiotherapy sessions afterward. However, the application of radiation therapy directly into the open brain during surgery might be accompanied by severe perioperative complications and, therefore, might negatively impact the overall benefit. In the present study, we show that patients who underwent surgery for BM combined with IORT do not suffer from elevated levels of perioperative complications compared to patients without IORT. Therefore, IORT constitutes a safe treatment strategy for cancer patients with BM. Abstract Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) of the operative cavity for surgically treated brain metastasis (BM) has gained increasing prominence with respect to improved local tumor control. However, IORT immediately performed at the time of surgery might be associated with increased levels of perioperative adverse events (PAEs). In the present study, we performed safety metric profiling in patients who had undergone surgery for BM with and without IORT in order to comparatively analyze feasibility of IORT as an adjuvant radiation approach. Between November 2020 and October 2021, 35 patients were surgically treated for BM with IORT at our neuro-oncological center. Perioperative complication profiles were collected in a prospective observational cohort study by means of patient safety indicators (PSIs), hospital-acquired conditions (HACs), and specific cranial-surgery-related complications (CSCs) as high-standard quality metric tools and compared to those of an institutional cohort of 388 patients with BM resection without IORT in a balanced comparative matched-pair analysis. Overall, 4 out of 35 patients (11%) with IORT in the course BM resection suffered from PAEs, accounting for 3 PSIs (9%) and 1 HAC (3%). Balanced matched-pair analysis did not reveal significant differences in the perioperative complication profiles between the cohorts of patients with and without IORT (p = 0.44). Thirty-day mortality rates were 6% for patients with IORT versus 8% for patients without IORT (p = 0.73). The present study demonstrates that IORT constitutes a safe and clinically feasible adjuvant treatment modality in patients undergoing surgical resection of BM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Motaz Hamed
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (M.H.); (V.B.); (M.H.); (E.G.); (P.S.); (H.V.)
| | - Anna-Laura Potthoff
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (M.H.); (V.B.); (M.H.); (E.G.); (P.S.); (H.V.)
- Correspondence: (A.-L.P.); (M.S.)
| | - Julian P. Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (J.P.L.); (D.K.); (D.S.); (G.R.S.); (J.A.H.); (S.G.); (F.A.G.); (L.C.S.)
| | - David Koch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (J.P.L.); (D.K.); (D.S.); (G.R.S.); (J.A.H.); (S.G.); (F.A.G.); (L.C.S.)
| | - Valeri Borger
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (M.H.); (V.B.); (M.H.); (E.G.); (P.S.); (H.V.)
| | - Muriel Heimann
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (M.H.); (V.B.); (M.H.); (E.G.); (P.S.); (H.V.)
| | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (J.P.L.); (D.K.); (D.S.); (G.R.S.); (J.A.H.); (S.G.); (F.A.G.); (L.C.S.)
| | - Gustavo R. Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (J.P.L.); (D.K.); (D.S.); (G.R.S.); (J.A.H.); (S.G.); (F.A.G.); (L.C.S.)
| | - Jasmin A. Holz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (J.P.L.); (D.K.); (D.S.); (G.R.S.); (J.A.H.); (S.G.); (F.A.G.); (L.C.S.)
| | | | - Alexander Radbruch
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (F.C.S.); (A.R.)
| | - Erdem Güresir
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (M.H.); (V.B.); (M.H.); (E.G.); (P.S.); (H.V.)
| | - Niklas Schäfer
- Division of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (N.S.); (U.H.)
| | - Patrick Schuss
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (M.H.); (V.B.); (M.H.); (E.G.); (P.S.); (H.V.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, BG Klinikum Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, 12683 Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephan Garbe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (J.P.L.); (D.K.); (D.S.); (G.R.S.); (J.A.H.); (S.G.); (F.A.G.); (L.C.S.)
| | - Frank A. Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (J.P.L.); (D.K.); (D.S.); (G.R.S.); (J.A.H.); (S.G.); (F.A.G.); (L.C.S.)
| | - Ulrich Herrlinger
- Division of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (N.S.); (U.H.)
| | - Hartmut Vatter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (M.H.); (V.B.); (M.H.); (E.G.); (P.S.); (H.V.)
| | - Leonard Christopher Schmeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (J.P.L.); (D.K.); (D.S.); (G.R.S.); (J.A.H.); (S.G.); (F.A.G.); (L.C.S.)
| | - Matthias Schneider
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; (M.H.); (V.B.); (M.H.); (E.G.); (P.S.); (H.V.)
- Correspondence: (A.-L.P.); (M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cifarelli CP, Jacobson GM. Intraoperative Radiotherapy in Brain Malignancies: Indications and Outcomes in Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors. Front Oncol 2021; 11:768168. [PMID: 34858846 PMCID: PMC8631760 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.768168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the continued controversy over defining an optimal delivery mechanism, the critical role of adjuvant radiation in the management of surgically resected primary and metastatic brain tumors remains one of the universally accepted standards in neuro-oncology. Local disease control still ranks as a significant predictor of survival in both high-grade glioma and treated intracranial metastases with radiation treatment being essential in maximizing tumor control. As with the emergence and eventual acceptance of cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) following an era dominated by traditional radiotherapy, evidence to support the use of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) in brain tumors requiring surgical intervention continues to accumulate. While the clinical trial strategies in treating glioblastoma with IORT involve delivery of a boost of cavitary radiation prior to the planned standard external beam radiation, the use of IORT in metastatic disease offers the potential for dose escalation to the level needed for definitive adjuvant radiation, eliminating the need for additional episodes of care while providing local control equal or superior to that achieved with SRS in a single fraction. In this review, we explore the contemporary clinical data on IORT in the treatment of brain tumors along with a discussion of the unique dosimetric and radiobiological factors inherent in IORT that could account for favorable outcome data beyond those seen in other techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher P Cifarelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States.,Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States
| | - Geraldine M Jacobson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Intraoperative radiotherapy with low-energy x-rays after neurosurgical resection of brain metastases-an Augsburg University Medical Center experience. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:1124-1130. [PMID: 34415358 PMCID: PMC8604815 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01831-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Purpose External-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is the predominant method for localized brain radiotherapy (LBRT) after resection of brain metastases (BM). Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with 50-kV x‑rays is an alternative way to focally irradiate the resection cavity after BM surgery, with the option of shortening the overall treatment time and limiting normal tissue irradiation. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of all patients who underwent neurosurgical resection of BM and 50-kV x‑ray IORT between 2013 and 2020 at Augsburg University Medical Center. Results We identified 40 patients with 44 resected BM treated with 50-kV x‑ray IORT. Median diameter of the resected metastases was 2.8 cm (range 1.5–5.9 cm). Median applied dose was 20 Gy. All patients received standardized follow-up (FU) including 3‑monthly MRI of the brain. Mean FU was 14.4 months, with a median MRI FU for alive patients of 12.2 months. Median overall survival (OS) of all treated patients was 26.4 months (estimated 1‑year OS 61.6%). The observed local control (LC) rate of the resection cavity was 88.6% (estimated 1‑year LC 84.3%). Distant brain control (DC) was 47.5% (estimated 1‑year DC 33.5%). Only 25% of all patients needed WBI in the further course of disease. The observed radionecrosis rate was 2.5%. Conclusion IORT with 50-kV x‑rays is a safe and appealing way to apply LBRT after neurosurgical resection of BM, with low toxicity and excellent LC. Close MRI FU is paramount to detect distant brain failure (DBF) early.
Collapse
|
15
|
Sarria GR, Cifarelli CP, Kahl H, Giordano FA. In regard to Minniti et al.: Current status and recent advances in resection cavity irradiation of brain metastases-roundup to cover all angles. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:127. [PMID: 34246284 PMCID: PMC8272371 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01854-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
We read with great interest the recent review, entitled "Current status and recent advances in resection cavity irradiation of brain metastases". It is a comprehensive summary of currently available techniques for treatment of post-resection cavity in patients with this diagnosis. We would like to complement this manuscript by including intraoperative techniques as other viable approaches in the management of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1 Building 55, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Christopher P Cifarelli
- Department of Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Henning Kahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1 Building 55, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cifarelli CP, Brehmer S, Vargo JA, Hack JD, Kahl KH, Sarria-Vargas G, Giordano FA. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for surgically resected brain metastases: outcome analysis of an international cooperative study. J Neurooncol 2019; 145:391-397. [PMID: 31654248 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03309-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 10/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The ideal delivery of radiation to the surgical cavity of brain metastases (BMs) remains the subject of debate. Risks of local failure (LF) and radiation necrosis (RN) have prompted a reappraisal of the timing and/or modality of this critical component of BM management. IORT delivered at the time of resection for BMs requiring surgery offers the potential for improved local control (LC) afforded by the elimination of delay in time to initiation of radiation following surgery, decreased uncertainty in target delineation, and the possibility of dose escalation beyond that seen in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). This study provides a retrospective analysis with identification of potential predictors of outcomes. METHODS Retrospective data was collected on patients treated with IORT immediately following surgical resection of BMs at three institutions according to the approval of individual IRBs. All patients were treated with 50kV portable linear accelerator using spherical applicators ranging from 1.5 to 4.0 cm. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS with endpoints of LC, DBC, incidence of RN, and overall survival (OS) and p < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS 54 patients were treated with IORT with a median age of 64 years. The most common primary diagnosis was non-small cell lung cancer (40%) with the most common location in the frontal lobe (38%). Median follow-up was 7.2 months and 1-year LC, DBC, and OS were 88%, 58%, and 73%, respectively. LMD was identified in 2 patients (3%) and RN present in 4 patients (7%). The only predictor of LC was extent of resection with 1-year LC of 94% for GTR versus 62% for STR (p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS IORT is a safe and effective means of delivering adjuvant radiation to the BM resection cavities with high rates of LC and low incidence of RN. Further studies are warranted directly comparing LC outcomes to SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher P Cifarelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, 1 Medical Center Drive, Suite 4300, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
| | - Stefanie Brehmer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - Joshua D Hack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Klaus Henning Kahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Gustavo Sarria-Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Yuan M, Behrami E, Pannullo S, Schwartz TH, Wernicke AG. The Relationship Between Tumor Volume and Timing of Post-resection Stereotactic Radiosurgery to Maximize Local Control: A Critical Review. Cureus 2019; 11:e5762. [PMID: 31723521 PMCID: PMC6825444 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.5762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
After maximally safe neurosurgical resection of brain metastases, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is now recommended as an alternative to whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), which has been associated with cognitive decline. One complicating factor associated with SRS is that postoperative cavity dynamics can change dramatically, creating significant variability in the recommended timing of SRS. While SRS has been shown to improve local control (LC) in smaller tumor cavities, achieving excellent LC rates still remains a challenge in larger ones. Furthermore, factors predicting the optimal timing of SRS in relation to the cavity size need to be defined and implemented. Variables such as the delay between postoperative MRI and treatment are critical but poorly understood. One potential treatment option that may improve outcomes is brachytherapy, but the widespread implementation of this technique has been slow. This critical review analyzes the relationship between preoperative tumor volume, resection cavity size, and timing of SRS and explores how these variables must be understood in order to achieve the highest LC possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Yuan
- Neurological Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - Eltion Behrami
- Radiation Oncology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - Susan Pannullo
- Neurological Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, USA
| | | | - A Gabriella Wernicke
- Radiation Oncology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Traylor JI, Habib A, Patel R, Muir M, Gadot R, Briere T, Yeboa DN, Li J, Rao G. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for local control of resected brain metastases. J Neurooncol 2019; 144:343-350. [PMID: 31313060 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03233-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been shown to establish local control in patients with resected brain metastases, yet its efficacy may be limited, particularly for resected lesions with large post-operative resection cavities. We describe the efficacy of postoperative fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) for local control in patients who have undergone resection for brain metastases. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed patients who received FSRT for resected brain metastases in 3 or 5 fractions. Time to local recurrence was the primary endpoint in this study. RESULTS Sixty-seven patients (n = 29 female, n = 38 male) met study criteria for review. The median age of the cohort was 62 years (range 18-79 years). Median preoperative tumor volume was 11.1 cm3 (range 0.4-77.0 cm3). The rate of local control was 91.0% at 6 months, 85.1% at 12 months, and 85.1% at 18 months. Estimates of freedom from local recurrence at 6 and 12 months were 90.9% and 84.3%, respectively. Higher biologically equivalent doses (BED10) were found to be predictive of longer freedom from local recurrence on univariate and multivariable analysis. Larger cavity volumes were found to correspond to longer time to local recurrence on univariate and multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that postoperative FSRT may be an effective method for providing local control to the surgical bed in patients with resected brain metastases, particularly for larger tumors not amenable to conventional, single-fraction SRS. Additional prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey I Traylor
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ahmed Habib
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rajan Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthew Muir
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ron Gadot
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tina Briere
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Debra N Yeboa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ganesh Rao
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. .,Department of of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Room FC7.2000, Unit 853, Houston, TX, 77030-4009, USA.
| |
Collapse
|