LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery versus hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy delivered in 3 or 5 fractions for vestibular schwannomas: comparative assessment from a single institution

Comparison of Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Hypofractionated Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas: A Meta-Analysis of Available Literature

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and recently, hypofractionated radiosurgery (hSRS) are increasingly utilized as treatment for vestibular schwannomas (VS). We performed a meta-analysis of literature comparing these modalities.

METHODS

The PubMed database of articles was searched for studies that compared SRS and hSRS in patients with VS. Variables analyzed include tumor control, hearing preservation, facial nerve preservation, trigeminal nerve preservation, and total complications. Heterogeneity across the studies was gauged using Higgins's inconsistency index. Funnel plots and Egger's regression intercept test were used to address the publication bias.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies that satisfied the search criteria were selected for meta-analysis. The studies identified in our study included 353 SRS and 511 hSRS-treated patients. Analysis of heterogeneity showed that hSRS is employed for relatively larger tumor sizes in comparison to SRS. Pooled meta-analysis estimates showed no significant differences between SRS and hSRS in terms of tumor control (odds ratio [OR], 0.620; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-1.86, P = 0.39), hearing preservation (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.59-1.93, P = 0.83), facial nerve preservation (OR, 0.53; 5% CI, 0.23-1.21, P = 0.13), or trigeminal nerve preservation (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.24-1.89, P = 0.49) at a mean follow-up of 39 months. Statistically significant heterogeneity was found across the studies only for tumor diameter (Higgins's inconsistency index = 65.69%, P = 0.003) but not for other variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Meta-analysis of thirteen studies comparing SRS and hSRS as treatment for VS showed comparable tumor control, hearing preservation, facial nerve preservation, and trigeminal nerve preservation.

Single Fraction and Hypofractionated Radiation Cause Cochlear Damage, Hearing Loss, and Reduced Viability of Merlin-Deficient Schwann Cells

BACKGROUND

Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign intracranial tumors caused by loss of function of the merlin tumor suppressor. We tested three hypotheses related to radiation, hearing loss (HL), and VS cell survival: (1) radiation causes HL by injuring auditory hair cells (AHC), (2) fractionation reduces radiation-induced HL, and (3) single fraction and equivalent appropriately dosed multi-fractions are equally effective at controlling VS growth. We investigated the effects of single fraction and hypofractionated radiation on hearing thresholds in rats, cell death pathways in rat cochleae, and viability of human merlin-deficient Schwann cells (MD-SC).

METHODS

Adult rats received cochlear irradiation with single fraction (0 to 18 Gray [Gy]) or hypofractionated radiation. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing was performed for 24 weeks. AHC viabilities were determined using immunohistochemistry. Neonatal rat cochleae were harvested after irradiation, and gene- and cell-based assays were conducted. MD-SCs were irradiated, and viability assays and immunofluorescence for DNA damage and cell cycle markers were performed.

RESULTS

Radiation caused dose-dependent and progressive HL in rats and AHC losses by promoting expression of apoptosis-associated genes and proteins. When compared to 12 Gy single fraction, hypofractionation caused smaller ABR threshold and pure tone average shifts and was more effective at reducing MD-SC viability.

CONCLUSIONS

Investigations into the mechanisms of radiation ototoxicity and VS radiobiology will help determine optimal radiation regimens and identify potential therapies to mitigate radiation-induced HL and improve VS tumor control.

Early Translabyrinthine Surgery for Small- and Medium-Sized Vestibular Schwannomas: Consecutive Cohort Analysis of Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Reappraisal of the role of translabyrinthine (TLAB) surgery in small- and medium-sized vestibular schwannomas (VSs).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

A total of 330 consecutive patients diagnosed between 1973 and 2019 with small- and medium-sized VS up to 20 mm in the extrameatal portion submitted to surgical treatment.

INTERVENTIONS

VS removal through microscopic TLAB approach.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Facial nerve function according to the House-Brackmann scale at 12-month follow-up, postoperative complications and entity of tumor resection assessed with postoperative MRI. A comparative analysis of outcomes between two groups of patients was further conducted, according to tumor size: Group A, small-sized (intrameatal or ≤10 mm extrameatal tumors) and Group B, medium-sized VSs (extrameatal between 11 and 20 mm).

RESULTS

Complete tumor removal was achieved in all cases. The overall complication rate was 5.5%, being cerebrospinal fluid leak the most frequent. Patients with small-sized VS (n = 121) presented a significantly better facial nerve function than patients with medium-sized tumors (n = 209), showing House-Brackmann Grades I to II in 92.6% versus 73.6% of cases, respectively ( p < 0.001). A nearly 4.5-fold higher risk of poor facial nerve function at 12 months affects patients with medium-sized tumors (odds ratio, 4.473; 95% confidence interval, 2.122-9.430; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In the current scenario of multioptional VS management, when hearing preservation is not feasible, early TLAB approach as first-line treatment for small-sized VSs showed favorable results. Factors supporting such proactive surgical treatment include long-term definitive cure, no major complications, good facial nerve outcomes, and the possibility of simultaneous hearing rehabilitation with a cochlear implant.

Safety and Efficacy of Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Facial Nerve Schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

In the current era of modern neurosurgery, the treatment strategies have been shifted to "nerve-preservation approaches" for achieving a higher facial and hearing function preservation rate following facial nerve tumors. We have conducted this novel report on determining the outcome of patients with facial nerve schwannomas (FNS) treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (hfSRS).

PATIENTS

Retrospective chart review of a prospectively maintained database search was conducted.

INTERVENTION

Patients who underwent hfSRS CyberKnife (Accuray Inc, Sunnyvale, CA, U.S.A.) for FNS were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcomes consisted of tumor control, facial and hearing nerve function as graded by House-Brackmann and American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery recommendations, and adverse radiation effects.

RESULTS

With an institutional board review approval, we retrospectively identified five patients with FNS (four intracranial [80%] and one extracranial [20%]) treated with hfSRS (2011-2019). Patients received definitive SRS in three patients (60.0%), whereas adjuvant to surgical resection in two patients (40.0%). A median tumor volume of 7.5 cm3 (range, 1.5-19.6 cm3) received a median prescription dose of 23.2 Gy (range, 21-25 Gy) administered in median of three fractions (range, three to five sessions). With a median radiographic follow-up of 31.4 months (range, 13.0-71.0 mo) and clinical follow-up of 32.6 months (range, 15.1-72.0 mo), the local tumor control was 100.0%. At the last clinical follow-up, the facial nerve function improved or remained unchanged House-Brackmann I-II in 80.0% of the patients, whereas the hearing nerve function improved or remained stable in 100.0% of the patients. Temporary clinical toxicity was observed in three patients (60.0%), which resolved. None of the patients developed adverse radiation effect.

CONCLUSION

From our case series, hfSRS in FNS seems to be safe and efficacious in terms of local tumor control, and improved facial and hearing nerve function.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is characterized by often bilateral vestibular schwannomas (VS) that result in progressive hearing loss and compression of nearby brainstem structures causing cranial nerve palsies. Treatment of these tumors remains challenging, as both surgical removal and expectant management can result in symptom progression. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been investigated for the management of NF2-associated VS; however, the role, promises, and pitfalls of this treatment modality remain unclear.

METHODS

Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Reviews were searched for studies assessing SRS outcome in NF2-associated VS only. Primary endpoints included tumor control, serviceable hearing, presence of tinnitus, and cranial nerve V and VII symptoms.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies (589 patients harboring 750 tumors) were analyzed. Clinical tumor control was achieved in 88% of cases (95% CI 80-95%); salvage surgery was needed in 8% (95% CI 4-13%) of cases. Treatment resulted in a worsening of pre-treatment serviceable hearing (OR = 0.26, p < 0.01), increased facial nerve (OR = 1.62, p < 0.01) and trigeminal nerve (OR = 1.42, p = 0.07) impairment. The incidence of vestibular symptoms and hydrocephalus were not consistently reported and thus could not be assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of NF2-associated VS continues to pose a challenge, as current SRS regimens result in impaired hearing and worse cranial nerve comorbidities, despite achieving high tumor control. It remains unclear if these findings have to be regarded as treatment complications or, rather, continued disease progression.

Effect of Anatomic Segment Involvement on Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Facial Nerve Schwannomas: An International Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Facial nerve schwannomas are rare, challenging tumors to manage due to their nerve of origin. Functional outcomes after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are incompletely defined.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effect of facial nerve segment involvement on functional outcome for these tumors.

METHODS

Patients who underwent single-session SRS for facial nerve schwannomas with at least 3 mo follow-up at 11 participating centers were included. Preoperative and treatment variables were recorded. Outcome measures included radiological tumor response and neurological function.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients (34 females) were included in the present study. In total, 75% had preoperative facial weakness. Mean tumor volume and margin dose were 2.0 ± 2.4 cm3 and 12.2 ± 0.54 Gy, respectively. Mean radiological follow-up was 45.5 ± 38.9 mo. Progression-free survival at 2, 5, and 10 yr was 98.1%, 87.2%, and 87.2%, respectively. The cumulative proportion of patients with regressing tumors at 2, 5, and 10 yr was 43.1%, 63.6%, and 63.6%, respectively. The number of involved facial nerve segments significantly predicted tumor progression (P = .04). Facial nerve function was stable or improved in 57 patients (90%). Patients with involvement of the labyrinthine segment of the facial nerve were significantly more likely to have an improvement in facial nerve function after SRS (P = .03). Hearing worsened in at least 6% of patients. Otherwise, adverse radiation effects included facial twitching (3 patients), facial numbness (2 patients), and dizziness (2 patients).

CONCLUSION

SRS for facial nerve schwannomas is effective and spares facial nerve function in most patients. Some patients may have functional improvement after treatment, particularly if the labyrinthine segment is involved.