1
|
Dharnipragada R, Shah RA, Reynolds M, Dusenbery K, Chen CC. Laser interstitial thermal therapy followed by consolidation stereotactic radiosurgery (LITT-cSRS) in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis. J Neurooncol 2024; 169:155-163. [PMID: 38865010 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04712-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The efficacy and safety of laser interstitial thermal therapy followed by consolidation radiosurgery (LITT-cSRS) was previously studied in brain metastasis that recurs locally after initial radiosurgery (BMRS). Here, we characterize the clinical outcome of LITT-cSRS in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis. METHODS Between 2017 and 2023, ten consecutive cancer patients with newly diagnosed brain mass of unclear etiology who underwent stereotactic needle biopsy (SNB) and LITT in the same setting followed by consolidation SRS (cSRS) with > 6 months follow-up were identified retrospectively. Clinical and imaging outcomes were collected. RESULTS The histology of the BM were: breast cancer (n = 3), melanoma (n = 3), non-cell cell lung cancer (n = 3), colon (n = 1). There were no wound or procedural complications. All patients were discharged home, with a median one-day hospital stay (range: 1-2 days). All patients were off corticosteroid therapy by the one-month follow-up. cSRS were carried out 12-27 days (median of 19 days) after SNB + LITT. There were no subsequent emergency room presentation, 30-day or 90-day re-admission. The Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) remains stable or improved at the 3 months-follow-up. With a median follow-up of 416 days (13.8 mo; range: 199-1,096 days), there was one local recurrence at 384 days (12.8 mo) post-LITT-cSRS. With exception of this patient with local recurrence, all patients showed decreased FLAIR volume surrounding the LITT-cSRS treated BMRS by the six-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS To our awareness, this case series represent the first to describe LITT-cSRS in the setting of newly diagnosed BM. The results presented here provide pilot data to support the safety and efficacy of LITT-cSRS and lay the foundation for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajiv Dharnipragada
- Medical School, University of Minnesota, University of Minnesota Twin-Cities, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Rena A Shah
- Oncology & Hematology, Health Partners Park Nicollet, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Margaret Reynolds
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Kathryn Dusenbery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Clark C Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xu S, Zhang G, Zhang J, Liu W, Wang Y, Fu X. Advances in Brain Tumor Therapy Based on the Magnetic Nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine 2023; 18:7803-7823. [PMID: 38144513 PMCID: PMC10749175 DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s444319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain tumors, including primary gliomas and brain metastases, are one of the deadliest tumors because effective macromolecular antitumor drugs cannot easily penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and blood-brain tumor barrier (BTB). Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) are considered the most suitable nanocarriers for the delivery of brain tumor drugs because of their unique properties compared to other nanoparticles. Numerous preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated the potential of these nanoparticles in magnetic targeting, nuclear magnetic resonance, magnetic thermal therapy, and ultrasonic hyperthermia. To further develop and optimize MNPs for the diagnosis and treatment of brain tumors, we attempt to outline recent advances in the use of MNPs to deliver drugs, with a particular focus on their efficacy in the delivery of anti-brain tumor drugs based on magnetic targeting and low-intensity focused ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging for surgical real-time guidance, and magnetothermal and ultrasonic hyperthermia therapy. Furthermore, we summarize recent findings on the clinical application of MNPs and the research limitations that need to be addressed in clinical translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Songbai Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Department of Obstetrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Center, the First Hospital Jilin University, Changchun, People’s Republic of China
| | - Guangxin Zhang
- Department of Endocrinology, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory on Molecular and Chemical Genetics, Department of Thoracic Surgery, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jiaomei Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Department of Obstetrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Center, the First Hospital Jilin University, Changchun, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Endocrinology, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory on Molecular and Chemical Genetics, Department of Thoracic Surgery, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yicun Wang
- Department of Endocrinology, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory on Molecular and Chemical Genetics, Department of Thoracic Surgery, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiying Fu
- Department of Endocrinology, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory on Molecular and Chemical Genetics, Department of Thoracic Surgery, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alattar AA, Dhawan S, Bartek J, Carroll K, Ma J, Sanghvi P, Chen CC. Increased risk for ex-vacuo ventriculomegaly with leukoencephalopathy (EVL) in whole brain radiation therapy and repeat radiosurgery treated brain metastasis patients. J Clin Neurosci 2023; 115:95-100. [PMID: 37541084 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2023.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cerebral atrophy with leukoencephalopathy is a known morbidity after whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), resulting in ex-vacuo ventriculomegaly with leukoencephalopathy (EVL). Here we studied the correlation between WBRT, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and risk for EVL in brain metastases patients. METHODS In a retrospective study, we identified 195 patients (with 1,018 BM) who underwent SRS for BM (2007-2017) and had > 3 months of MRI follow-up. All patients who underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunting were excluded. Cerebral atrophy was measured by ex-vacuo-ventriculomegaly, defined based on Evans' criteria. Demographic and clinical variables were analyzed using logistic regression models. RESULTS Ex-vacuo ventriculomegaly was observed on pre-radiosurgery imaging in 29.7% (58/195) of the study cohort. On multivariate analysis, older age was the only variable associated with pre-radiosurgery ventriculomegaly. Of the 137 patients with normal ventricular size before radiosurgery, 27 (19.7 %) developed ex-vacuo ventriculomegaly and leukoencephalopathy (EVL) post-SRS. In univariate analysis, previous whole brain radiation therapy was the main factor associated with increased risk for developing EVL (OR = 5.08, p < 0.001). In bivariate models that included prior receipt of WBRT, both the number of SRS treatments (OR = 1.499, p = 0.025) and WBRT (OR = 11.321, p = 0.003 were independently associated with increased EVL risk. CONCLUSIONS While repeat radiosurgery contributes to the risk of EVL in BM patients, this risk is ∼20-fold lower than that associated with WBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali A Alattar
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sanjay Dhawan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Jiri Bartek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Kate Carroll
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jun Ma
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Parag Sanghvi
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Clark C Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hamade YJ, Mehrotra A, Chen CC. Stereotactic needle biopsy and laser ablation of geographically distinct lesions through a novel magnetic resonance imaging-compatible cranial stereotaxic frame: illustrative case. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY. CASE LESSONS 2023; 5:CASE22448. [PMID: 36624633 PMCID: PMC9830414 DOI: 10.3171/case22448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current technologies that support stereotactic laser ablation (SLA) of geographically distinct lesions require placement of multiple bolts or time-consuming, intertrajectory adjustments. OBSERVATIONS Two geographically distinct nodular lesions were safely biopsied and laser ablated in a 62-year-old woman with recurrent glioblastoma using the ClearPoint Array frame, a novel magnetic resonance imaging-compatible stereotactic frame designed to support independent parallel trajectories without intertrajectory frame adjustment. LESSONS Here, the authors provide a proof-of-principle case report demonstrating that geographically distinct lesions can be safely biopsied and ablated through parallel trajectories supported by the ClearPoint Array frame without intertrajectory adjustment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youssef J. Hamade
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; and
| | - Avanti Mehrotra
- Department of Oncology, North Memorial Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Clark C. Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; and
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Grabowski MM, Srinivasan ES, Vaios EJ, Sankey EW, Otvos B, Krivosheya D, Scott A, Olufawo M, Ma J, Fomchenko EI, Herndon JE, Kim AH, Chiang VL, Chen CC, Leuthardt EC, Barnett GH, Kirkpatrick JP, Mohammadi AM, Fecci PE. Combination Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy Plus Stereotactic Radiotherapy (SRT) Increases Time to Progression for Biopsy-Proven Recurrent Brain Metastases. Neurooncol Adv 2022; 4:vdac086. [PMID: 35795470 PMCID: PMC9248774 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Improved survival for patients with brain metastases has been accompanied by a rise in tumor recurrence after stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has emerged as an effective treatment for SRT failures as an alternative to open resection or repeat SRT. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of LITT followed by SRT (LITT+SRT) in recurrent brain metastases. Methods A multicenter, retrospective study was performed of patients who underwent treatment for biopsy-proven brain metastasis recurrence after SRT at an academic medical center. Patients were stratified by “planned LITT+SRT” versus “LITT alone” versus “repeat SRT alone.” Index lesion progression was determined by modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria. Results Fifty-five patients met inclusion criteria, with a median follow-up of 7.3 months (range: 1.0–30.5), age of 60 years (range: 37–86), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) of 80 (range: 60–100), and pre-LITT/biopsy contrast-enhancing volume of 5.7 cc (range: 0.7–19.4). Thirty-eight percent of patients underwent LITT+SRT, 45% LITT alone, and 16% SRT alone. Median time to index lesion progression (29.8, 7.5, and 3.7 months [P = .022]) was significantly improved with LITT+SRT. When controlling for age in a multivariate analysis, patients treated with LITT+SRT remained significantly less likely to have index lesion progression (P = .004). Conclusions These data suggest that LITT+SRT is superior to LITT or repeat SRT alone for treatment of biopsy-proven brain metastasis recurrence after SRT failure. Prospective trials are warranted to validate the efficacy of using combination LITT+SRT for treatment of recurrent brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew M Grabowski
- Corresponding Author: Matthew M. Grabowski, MD, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave. S4, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA ()
| | - Ethan S Srinivasan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Eugene J Vaios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Eric W Sankey
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Balint Otvos
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic & Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Daria Krivosheya
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic & Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Alex Scott
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Michael Olufawo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jun Ma
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Elena I Fomchenko
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - James E Herndon
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Albert H Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Veronica L Chiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Clark C Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Eric C Leuthardt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Gene H Barnett
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic & Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - John P Kirkpatrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alireza M Mohammadi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic & Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|