1
|
Leng JX, Carpenter DJ, Huang C, Qazi J, Arshad M, Mullikin TC, Reitman ZJ, Kirkpatrick JP, Floyd SR, Fecci PE, Chmura SJ, Hong JC, Salama JK. Determinants of Symptomatic Intracranial Progression After an Initial Stereotactic Radiosurgery Course. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101475. [PMID: 38690297 PMCID: PMC11059392 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Clinical and imaging surveillance of patients with brain metastases is important after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) because many will experience intracranial progression (ITCP) requiring multidisciplinary management. The prognostic significance of neurologic symptoms at the time of ITCP is poorly understood. Methods and Materials This was a multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study from 2015 to 2020, including all patients with brain metastases completing an initial course of SRS. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) by presence of neurologic symptoms at ITCP. OS, freedom from ITCP (FF-ITCP), and freedom from symptomatic ITCP (FF-SITCP) were assessed via Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard models tested parameters impacting FF-ITCP and FF-SITCP. Results Among 1383 patients, median age was 63.4 years, 55% were female, and common primaries were non-small cell lung (49%), breast (15%), and melanoma (9%). At a median follow-up of 8.72 months, asymptomatic and symptomatic ITCP were observed in 504 (36%) and 194 (14%) patients, respectively. The majority of ITCP were distant ITCP (79.5%). OS was worse with SITCP (median, 10.2 vs 17.9 months, P < .001). SITCP was associated with clinical factors including total treatment volume (P = .012), melanoma histology (P = .001), prior whole brain radiation therapy (P = .003), number of brain metastases (P < .001), interval of 1 to 2 years from primary and brain metastasis diagnosis (P = .012), controlled extracranial disease (P = .042), and receipt of pre-SRS chemotherapy (P = .015). Patients who were younger and received post-SRS chemotherapy (P = .001), immunotherapy (P < .001), and targeted or small-molecule inhibitor therapy (P < .026) had better FF-SITCP. Conclusions In this cohort study of patients with brain metastases completing SRS, neurologic symptoms at ITCP is prognostic for OS. This data informs post-SRS surveillance in clinical practice as well as future prospective studies needed in the modern management of brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jim X. Leng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - David J. Carpenter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wellstar Paulding Hospital, Hiram, Georgia
| | - Christina Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jamiluddin Qazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Muzamil Arshad
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Trey C. Mullikin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Zachary J. Reitman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - John P. Kirkpatrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Scott R. Floyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Peter E. Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Steven J. Chmura
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Julian C. Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Joint Program in Computational Precision Health, University of California, San Francisco, California and University of California, Berkeley, California
| | - Joseph K. Salama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Service, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chiang VL, Pugazenthi S, Leidig WA, Rodriguez A, Prabhu S, Haskell-Mendoza AP, Fecci PE, Placantonakis DG, Abram SR, Lega B, Kim AH. Laser interstitial thermal therapy for new and recurrent meningioma: a prospective and retrospective case series. J Neurosurg 2024:1-11. [PMID: 38457795 DOI: 10.3171/2023.12.jns231542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Meningiomas are the most common primary brain tumors in adults and a subset are aggressive lesions resistant to standard therapies. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has been successfully applied to other brain tumors, and recent work aims to explore the safety and long-term outcome experiences of LITT for both new and recurrent meningiomas. The authors' objective was to report safety and outcomes data of the largest cohort of LITT-treated meningioma patients to date. METHODS Eight United States-based hospitals enrolled patients with meningioma in the Laser Ablation of Abnormal Neurological Tissue Using Robotic NeuroBlate System (LAANTERN) prospective multicenter registry and/or contributed additional retrospective enrollments for this cohort study. Demographic, procedural, safety, and outcomes data were collected and analyzed using standard statistical methods. RESULTS Twenty adult patients (12 prospective and 8 retrospective) with LITT-targeted meningiomas were accrued. Patients underwent LITT for new (6 patients) and recurrent (14 patients) tumors (ranging from the 1st to 12th recurrence). The 30-day complication rate was 10%. Twenty percent of patients (4/20) had exhausted all other treatment options. Median length of follow-up was 1.3 years. One-third of new (2/6) and one-half of recurrent (7/14) meningiomas had disease progression during follow-up. One-year estimated local control (LC), progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 55.3%, 48.4%, and 86.3%, respectively. In the 12 patients who had ≥ 91% ablative coverage, 1-year estimated LC was 61.4%. The complication rate was 10% (2/20), with 1 complication being transient and resolving postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS This cohort study supports the safety of the procedure for this tumor type. LITT can offer a much-needed treatment option, especially for patients with multiply recurrent meningiomas who have limited remaining alternatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronica L Chiang
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Sangami Pugazenthi
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - William A Leidig
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Analiz Rodriguez
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Medical Center, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Sujit Prabhu
- 4University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Peter E Fecci
- 5Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Steven R Abram
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, Ascension St. Thomas Hospital West, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Bradley Lega
- 8Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; and
| | - Albert H Kim
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
- 9The Brain Tumor Center, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fairchild A, Salama JK, Godfrey D, Wiggins WF, Ackerson BG, Oyekunle T, Niedzwiecki D, Fecci PE, Kirkpatrick JP, Floyd SR. Incidence and imaging characteristics of difficult to detect retrospectively identified brain metastases in patients receiving repeat courses of stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurooncol 2024:10.1007/s11060-024-04594-6. [PMID: 38340295 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04594-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE During stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) planning for brain metastases (BM), brain MRIs are reviewed to select appropriate targets based on radiographic characteristics. Some BM are difficult to detect and/or definitively identify and may go untreated initially, only to become apparent on future imaging. We hypothesized that in patients receiving multiple courses of SRS, reviewing the initial planning MRI would reveal early evidence of lesions that developed into metastases requiring SRS. METHODS Patients undergoing two or more courses of SRS to BM within 6 months between 2016 and 2018 were included in this single-institution, retrospective study. Brain MRIs from the initial course were reviewed for lesions at the same location as subsequently treated metastases; if present, this lesion was classified as a "retrospectively identified metastasis" or RIM. RIMs were subcategorized as meeting or not meeting diagnostic imaging criteria for BM (+ DC or -DC, respectively). RESULTS Among 683 patients undergoing 923 SRS courses, 98 patients met inclusion criteria. There were 115 repeat courses of SRS, with 345 treated metastases in the subsequent course, 128 of which were associated with RIMs found in a prior MRI. 58% of RIMs were + DC. 17 (15%) of subsequent courses consisted solely of metastases associated with + DC RIMs. CONCLUSION Radiographic evidence of brain metastases requiring future treatment was occasionally present on brain MRIs from prior SRS treatments. Most RIMs were + DC, and some subsequent SRS courses treated only + DC RIMs. These findings suggest enhanced BM detection might enable earlier treatment and reduce the need for additional SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Fairchild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
- Piedmont Radiation Oncology, 3333 Silas Creek Parkway, Winston Salem, NC, 27103, USA.
| | - Joseph K Salama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Radiation Oncology Service, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Devon Godfrey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Walter F Wiggins
- Deartment of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Bradley G Ackerson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Taofik Oyekunle
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - John P Kirkpatrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Scott R Floyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Koga SF, Hodges WB, Adamyan H, Hayes T, Fecci PE, Tsvankin V, Pradilla G, Hoang KB, Lee IY, Sankey EW, Codd PJ, Huie D, Zacharia BE, Verma R, Baboyan VG. Preoperative validation of edema-corrected tractography in neurosurgical practice: translating surgeon insights into novel software implementation. Front Neurol 2024; 14:1322815. [PMID: 38259649 PMCID: PMC10801029 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1322815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Peritumoral edema alters diffusion anisotropy, resulting in false negatives in tractography reconstructions negatively impacting surgical decision-making. With supratotal resections tied to survival benefit in glioma patients, advanced diffusion modeling is critical to visualize fibers within the peritumoral zone to prevent eloquent fiber transection thereafter. A preoperative assessment paradigm is therefore warranted to systematically evaluate multi-subject tractograms along clinically meaningful parameters. We propose a novel noninvasive surgically-focused survey to evaluate the benefits of a tractography algorithm for preoperative planning, subsequently applied to Synaptive Medical's free-water correction algorithm developed for clinically feasible single-shell DTI data. Methods Ten neurosurgeons participated in the study and were presented with patient datasets containing histological lesions of varying degrees of edema. They were asked to compare standard (uncorrected) tractography reconstructions overlaid onto anatomical images with enhanced (corrected) reconstructions. The raters assessed the datasets in terms of overall data quality, tract alteration patterns, and the impact of the correction on lesion definition, brain-tumor interface, and optimal surgical pathway. Inter-rater reliability coefficients were calculated, and statistical comparisons were made. Results Standard tractography was perceived as problematic in areas proximal to the lesion, presenting with significant tract reduction that challenged assessment of the brain-tumor interface and of tract infiltration. With correction applied, significant reduction in false negatives were reported along with additional insight into tract infiltration. Significant positive correlations were shown between favorable responses to the correction algorithm and the lesion-to-edema ratio, such that the correction offered further clarification in increasingly edematous and malignant lesions. Lastly, the correction was perceived to introduce false tracts in CSF spaces and - to a lesser degree - the grey-white matter interface, highlighting the need for noise mitigation. As a result, the algorithm was modified by free-water-parameterizing the tractography dataset and introducing a novel adaptive thresholding tool for customizable correction guided by the surgeon's discretion. Conclusion Here we translate surgeon insights into a clinically deployable software implementation capable of recovering peritumoral tracts in edematous zones while mitigating artifacts through the introduction of a novel and adaptive case-specific correction tool. Together, these advances maximize tractography's clinical potential to personalize surgical decisions when faced with complex pathologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian F. Koga
- Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady Health System, Baton Rouge, LA, United States
| | | | | | - Tim Hayes
- Synaptive Medical Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter E. Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Vadim Tsvankin
- Colorado Brain and Spine Institute, Englewood, CO, United States
| | - Gustavo Pradilla
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Kimberly B. Hoang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Ian Y. Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Eric W. Sankey
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Patrick J. Codd
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - David Huie
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Brad E. Zacharia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, United States
| | - Ragini Verma
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- Cohen Veterans Bioscience, New York, NY, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Haskell-Mendoza AP, Reason EH, Gonzalez AT, Jackson JD, Sankey EW, Srinivasan ES, Herndon JE, Fecci PE, Calabrese E. Automated Segmentation of Ablated Lesions Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks: A Basis for Response Assessment Following Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy. Neuro Oncol 2024:noad261. [PMID: 38170451 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) of intracranial tumors or radiation necrosis enables tissue diagnosis, cytoreduction, and rapid return to systemic therapies. Ablated tissue remains in situ, resulting in characteristic post-LITT edema associated with transient clinical worsening and complicating post-LITT response assessment. METHODS All patients receiving LITT at a single center for tumors or radiation necrosis from 2015 - 2023 with ≥ 9 months of MRI follow-up were included. An nnU-Net segmentation model was trained to automatically segment Contrast-enhancing Lesion Volume (CeLV) of LITT-treated lesions on T1-weighted images. Response assessment was performed using volumetric measurements. RESULTS 384 unique MRI exams of 61 LITT-treated lesions and 6 control cases of medically-managed radiation necrosis were analyzed. Automated segmentation was accurate in 367/384 (95.6%) images. CeLV increased to a median of 68.3% (IQR 35.1 - 109.2%) from baseline at 1 - 3 months from LITT (P = 0.0012) and returned to baseline thereafter. Overall survival (OS) for LITT-treated patients was 39.1 (9.2 - 93.4) months. Lesion expansion above 40% from volumetric nadir or baseline was considered volumetric progression. Twenty-one of 56 (37.5%) patients experienced progression for a volumetric progression-free survival of 21.4 (6.0 - 93.4) months. Patients with volumetric progression had worse OS (17.3 vs 62.1 months, P = 0.0015). CONCLUSIONS Post-LITT CeLV expansion is quantifiable and resolves within 6 months of LITT. Development of response assessment criteria for LITT-treated lesions is feasible and should be considered for clinical trials. Automated lesion segmentation could speed adoption of volumetric response criteria in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Joshua D Jackson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Eric W Sankey
- Department of Neurosurgery, Piedmont Athens Regional Medical Center, Athens, GA, USA
| | | | - James E Herndon
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Peter E Fecci
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Evan Calabrese
- Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Haskell-Mendoza AP, Radhakrishnan S, Nardin AL, Eilbacher K, Yang LZ, Jackson JD, Lee HJ, Sampson JH, Fecci PE. Utility of Routine Preoperative Urinalysis in the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections. World Neurosurg 2023; 180:e449-e459. [PMID: 37769846 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.09.087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Preoperative assessment is important for neurosurgical risk stratification, but the level of evidence for individual screening tests is low. In preoperative urinalysis (UA), testing may significantly increase costs and lead to inappropriate antibiotic treatment. We prospectively evaluated whether eliminating preoperative UA was noninferior to routine preoperative UA as measured by 30-day readmission for surgical site infection in adult elective neurosurgical procedures. METHODS A single-institution prospective, pragmatic study of patients receiving elective neurosurgical procedures from 2018 to 2020 was conducted. Patients were allocated based on same-day versus preoperative admission status. Rates of preoperative UA and subsequent wound infection were measured along with detailed demographic, surgical, and laboratory data. RESULTS The study included 879 patients. The most common types of surgery were cranial (54.7%), spine (17.4%), and stereotactic/functional (19.5%). No preoperative UA was performed in 315 patients, while 564 underwent UA. Of tested patients, 103 (18.3%) met criteria for suspected urinary tract infection, and 69 (12.2%) received subsequent antibiotic treatment. There were 14 patients readmitted within 30 days (7 without UA [2.2%] vs. 7 with UA [1.2%]) for subsequent wound infection with a risk difference of 0.98% (95% confidence interval -0.89% to 2.85%). The upper limit of the confidence interval exceeded the preselected noninferiority margin of 1%. CONCLUSIONS In this prospective study of preoperative UA for elective neurosurgical procedures using a pragmatic, real-world design, risk of readmission due to surgical site infection was very low across the study cohort, suggesting a limited role of preoperative UA for elective neurosurgical procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Senthil Radhakrishnan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ana Lisa Nardin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kristina Eilbacher
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lexie Zidanyue Yang
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Joshua D Jackson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Hui-Jie Lee
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - John H Sampson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Saatian B, Deshpande K, Herrera R, Sedighi S, Eisenbarth R, Iyer M, Das D, Julian A, Martirosian V, Lowman A, LaViolette P, Remsik J, Boire A, Sankey E, Fecci PE, Shiroishi MS, Chow F, Hurth K, Neman J. Breast-to-brain metastasis is exacerbated with chemotherapy through blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier and induces Alzheimer's-like pathology. J Neurosci Res 2023; 101:1900-1913. [PMID: 37787045 PMCID: PMC10769085 DOI: 10.1002/jnr.25249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
Control of breast-to-brain metastasis remains an urgent unmet clinical need. While chemotherapies are essential in reducing systemic tumor burden, they have been shown to promote non-brain metastatic invasiveness and drug-driven neurocognitive deficits through the formation of neurofibrillary tangles (NFT), independently. Now, in this study, we investigated the effect of chemotherapy on brain metastatic progression and promoting tumor-mediated NFT. Results show chemotherapies increase brain-barrier permeability and facilitate enhanced tumor infiltration, particularly through the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCSFB). This is attributed to increased expression of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) which, in turn, mediates loss of Claudin-6 within the choroid plexus cells of the BCSFB. Importantly, increased MMP9 activity in the choroid epithelium following chemotherapy results in cleavage and release of Tau from breast cancer cells. This cleaved Tau forms tumor-derived NFT that further destabilize the BCSFB. Our results underline for the first time the importance of the BCSFB as a vulnerable point of entry for brain-seeking tumor cells post-chemotherapy and indicate that tumor cells themselves contribute to Alzheimer's-like tauopathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Saatian
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California
- Brain Tumor Center, University of Southern California
| | - K Deshpande
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California
- Brain Tumor Center, University of Southern California
| | - R Herrera
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California
- Brain Tumor Center, University of Southern California
| | - S Sedighi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California
- Brain Tumor Center, University of Southern California
| | - R Eisenbarth
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California
- Brain Tumor Center, University of Southern California
| | - M Iyer
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California
| | - D Das
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California
| | - A Julian
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California
- Brain Tumor Center, University of Southern California
| | - V Martirosian
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California
- Brain Tumor Center, University of Southern California
| | - A Lowman
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering, Medical College of Wisconsin
| | - P LaViolette
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering, Medical College of Wisconsin
| | - J Remsik
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - A Boire
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | - E Sankey
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine
| | - PE Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine
| | - MS Shiroishi
- Brain Tumor Center, University of Southern California
- Department of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California
| | - F Chow
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California
- Brain Tumor Center, University of Southern California
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California
| | - K Hurth
- Brain Tumor Center, University of Southern California
- Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California
| | - J Neman
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California
- Brain Tumor Center, University of Southern California
- Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Singh K, Hotchkiss KM, Parney IF, De Groot J, Sahebjam S, Sanai N, Platten M, Galanis E, Lim M, Wen PY, Minniti G, Colman H, Cloughesy TF, Mehta MP, Geurts M, Arrillaga-Romany I, Desjardins A, Tanner K, Short S, Arons D, Duke E, Wick W, Bagley SJ, Ashley DM, Kumthekar P, Verhaak R, Chalmers AJ, Patel AP, Watts C, Fecci PE, Batchelor TT, Weller M, Vogelbaum MA, Preusser M, Berger MS, Khasraw M. Correcting the drug development paradigm for glioblastoma requires serial tissue sampling. Nat Med 2023; 29:2402-2405. [PMID: 37488293 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02464-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kirit Singh
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kelly M Hotchkiss
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - John De Groot
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Nader Sanai
- Ivy Brain Tumor Center, The Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Michael Platten
- Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Michael Lim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Howard Colman
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Annick Desjardins
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kirk Tanner
- National Brain Tumor Society (NBTS), Newton, MA, USA
| | - Susan Short
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - David Arons
- National Brain Tumor Society (NBTS), Newton, MA, USA
| | | | - Wolfgang Wick
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurooncology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephen J Bagley
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David M Ashley
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Priya Kumthekar
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Roel Verhaak
- School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Anoop P Patel
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Colin Watts
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Surgical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael A Vogelbaum
- Department of NeuroOncology, H. Lee Moffit Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mitchel S Berger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UCSF Brain Tumor Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mustafa Khasraw
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lerner EC, Woroniecka KI, D'Anniballe VM, Wilkinson DS, Mohan AA, Lorrey SJ, Waibl-Polania J, Wachsmuth LP, Miggelbrink AM, Jackson JD, Cui X, Raj JA, Tomaszewski WH, Cook SL, Sampson JH, Patel AP, Khasraw M, Gunn MD, Fecci PE. CD8 + T cells maintain killing of MHC-I-negative tumor cells through the NKG2D-NKG2DL axis. Nat Cancer 2023; 4:1258-1272. [PMID: 37537301 PMCID: PMC10518253 DOI: 10.1038/s43018-023-00600-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
The accepted paradigm for both cellular and anti-tumor immunity relies upon tumor cell killing by CD8+ T cells recognizing cognate antigens presented in the context of target cell major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I (MHC-I) molecules. Likewise, a classically described mechanism of tumor immune escape is tumor MHC-I downregulation. Here, we report that CD8+ T cells maintain the capacity to kill tumor cells that are entirely devoid of MHC-I expression. This capacity proves to be dependent instead on interactions between T cell natural killer group 2D (NKG2D) and tumor NKG2D ligands (NKG2DLs), the latter of which are highly expressed on MHC-loss variants. Necessarily, tumor cell killing in these instances is antigen independent, although prior T cell antigen-specific activation is required and can be furnished by myeloid cells or even neighboring MHC-replete tumor cells. In this manner, adaptive priming can beget innate killing. These mechanisms are active in vivo in mice as well as in vitro in human tumor systems and are obviated by NKG2D knockout or blockade. These studies challenge the long-advanced notion that downregulation of MHC-I is a viable means of tumor immune escape and instead identify the NKG2D-NKG2DL axis as a therapeutic target for enhancing T cell-dependent anti-tumor immunity against MHC-loss variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily C Lerner
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Daniel S Wilkinson
- Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Aditya A Mohan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Selena J Lorrey
- Department of Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Lucas P Wachsmuth
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Joshua D Jackson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Xiuyu Cui
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jude A Raj
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Sarah L Cook
- Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - John H Sampson
- Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Anoop P Patel
- Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Center for Advanced Genomic Technologies, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Mustafa Khasraw
- Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Michael D Gunn
- Department of Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Srinivasan ES, Liu Y, Odion RA, Chongsathidkiet P, Wachsmuth LP, Haskell-Mendoza AP, Edwards RM, Canning AJ, Willoughby G, Hinton J, Norton SJ, Lascola CD, Maccarini PF, Mariani CL, Vo-Dinh T, Fecci PE. Gold Nanostars Obviate Limitations to Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT) for the Treatment of Intracranial Tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:3214-3224. [PMID: 37327318 PMCID: PMC10425731 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-1871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is an effective minimally invasive treatment option for intracranial tumors. Our group produced plasmonics-active gold nanostars (GNS) designed to preferentially accumulate within intracranial tumors and amplify the ablative capacity of LITT. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN The impact of GNS on LITT coverage capacity was tested in ex vivo models using clinical LITT equipment and agarose gel-based phantoms of control and GNS-infused central "tumors." In vivo accumulation of GNS and amplification of ablation were tested in murine intracranial and extracranial tumor models followed by intravenous GNS injection, PET/CT, two-photon photoluminescence, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), histopathology, and laser ablation. RESULTS Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated the potential of GNS to accelerate and specify thermal distributions. In ex vivo cuboid tumor phantoms, the GNS-infused phantom heated 5.5× faster than the control. In a split-cylinder tumor phantom, the GNS-infused border heated 2× faster and the surrounding area was exposed to 30% lower temperatures, with margin conformation observed in a model of irregular GNS distribution. In vivo, GNS preferentially accumulated within intracranial tumors on PET/CT, two-photon photoluminescence, and ICP-MS at 24 and 72 hours and significantly expedited and increased the maximal temperature achieved in laser ablation compared with control. CONCLUSIONS Our results provide evidence for use of GNS to improve the efficiency and potentially safety of LITT. The in vivo data support selective accumulation within intracranial tumors and amplification of laser ablation, and the GNS-infused phantom experiments demonstrate increased rates of heating, heat contouring to tumor borders, and decreased heating of surrounding regions representing normal structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan S. Srinivasan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Yang Liu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Fitzpatrick Institute of Photonics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ren A. Odion
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Fitzpatrick Institute of Photonics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Pakawat Chongsathidkiet
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Lucas P. Wachsmuth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Ryan M. Edwards
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Aidan J. Canning
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Fitzpatrick Institute of Photonics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Gavin Willoughby
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Joseph Hinton
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Stephen J. Norton
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Fitzpatrick Institute of Photonics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Christopher D. Lascola
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Paolo F. Maccarini
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Fitzpatrick Institute of Photonics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Christopher L. Mariani
- Department of Clinical Sciences, NC State College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina
| | - Tuan Vo-Dinh
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Fitzpatrick Institute of Photonics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Peter E. Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Haskell-Mendoza AP, Srinivasan ES, Lerner EC, Edwards RM, Schwalb AM, Jackson JD, Hardigan AA, Vaios EJ, Fecci PE. Risk of Tract Seeding Following Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Brain Tumors. Neurosurgery 2023; 93:198-205. [PMID: 36790207 PMCID: PMC10553123 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The management of intracranial oncological disease remains a significant challenge despite advances in systemic cancer therapy. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) represents a novel treatment for local control of brain tumors through photocoagulation with a stereotactically implanted laser fiber. Because the use of laser interstitial thermal therapy continues to increase within neurosurgery, characterization of LITT is necessary to improve outcomes. OBJECTIVE To quantify the risk of tumor seeding along the laser fiber tract in patients receiving LITT for primary or metastatic brain tumors at a high-volume treatment center. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all patients receiving LITT from 2015 to 2021 at our medical center. Patients with biopsy-confirmed tumors were included in this study. Tract seeding was identified as discontinuous, newly enhancing tumor along the LITT tract. RESULTS Fifty-six patients received LITT for biopsy-confirmed tumors from 2015 to 2021, with tract seeding identified in 3 (5.4%). Twenty-nine (51.8%) patients had gliomas, while the remainder had metastases, of which lung was the most common histology (20 patients, 74%). Tract seeding was associated with ablation proceeding inward from superficial tumor margin closest to the cranial entry point ( P = .03). Patients with tract seeding had a shorter median time to progression of 1.1 (0.1-1.3) months vs 4.2 (2.2-8.6) months ( P = .03). CONCLUSION Although the risk of tract seeding after LITT is reassuringly low, it is associated with decreased progression-free survival. This risk may be related to surgical technique or experience. Follow-up radiosurgery to the LITT tract has the potential to prevent this complication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Emily C. Lerner
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ryan M. Edwards
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Joshua D. Jackson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Andrew A. Hardigan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Eugene J. Vaios
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Peter E. Fecci
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lerner EC, Srinivasan ES, Broadwater G, Haskell-Mendoza AP, Vaios EJ, Edwards RM, Wachsmuth LP, Huie D, Floyd SR, Adamson JD, Fecci PE. Erratum to “E.C. Lerner, E.S. Srinivasan, G. Broadwater, et al. Factors Associated With New-Onset Seizures Following Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Newly Diagnosed Brain Metastases. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022;7:101054.”. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101187. [PMID: 37008273 PMCID: PMC10050895 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101054.].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gloria Broadwater
- Cancer Statistical Center, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Eugene J. Vaios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | | - David Huie
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Scott R. Floyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Justus D. Adamson
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Peter E. Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Correponding author: Peter E. Fecci, MD, PhD
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lorrey SJ, Waibl Polania J, Wachsmuth LP, Hoyt-Miggelbrink A, Tritz ZP, Edwards R, Wolf DM, Johnson AJ, Fecci PE, Ayasoufi K. Systemic immune derangements are shared across various CNS pathologies and reflect novel mechanisms of immune privilege. Neurooncol Adv 2023; 5:vdad035. [PMID: 37207119 PMCID: PMC10191195 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdad035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The nervous and immune systems interact in a reciprocal manner, both under physiologic and pathologic conditions. Literature spanning various CNS pathologies including brain tumors, stroke, traumatic brain injury and de-myelinating diseases describes a number of associated systemic immunologic changes, particularly in the T-cell compartment. These immunologic changes include severe T-cell lymphopenia, lymphoid organ contraction, and T-cell sequestration within the bone marrow. Methods We performed an in-depth systematic review of the literature and discussed pathologies that involve brain insults and systemic immune derangements. Conclusions In this review, we propose that the same immunologic changes hereafter termed 'systemic immune derangements', are present across CNS pathologies and may represent a novel, systemic mechanism of immune privilege for the CNS. We further demonstrate that systemic immune derangements are transient when associated with isolated insults such as stroke and TBI but persist in the setting of chronic CNS insults such as brain tumors. Systemic immune derangements have vast implications for informed treatment modalities and outcomes of various neurologic pathologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selena J Lorrey
- Department of Immunology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jessica Waibl Polania
- Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Pathology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Lucas P Wachsmuth
- Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Pathology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Alexandra Hoyt-Miggelbrink
- Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Pathology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Ryan Edwards
- Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Delaney M Wolf
- Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Peter E Fecci
- Department of Immunology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Pathology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Haskell-Mendoza AP, Srinivasan ES, Suarez AD, Fecci PE. Laser ablation of a sphenoid wing meningioma: A case report and review of the literature. Surg Neurol Int 2023; 14:138. [PMID: 37151451 PMCID: PMC10159314 DOI: 10.25259/sni_1000_2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Meningiomas are the most common primary central nervous system neoplasm in the United States. While the majority of meningiomas are benign, the World Health Organization (WHO) Grade I tumors, a not-insignificant proportion of tumors are in anatomically complex locations or demonstrate more aggressive phenotypes, presenting a challenge for local disease control with surgery and radiation. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) consists of stereotactic delivery of laser light for tumor ablation and is minimally invasive, requiring implantation of a laser fiber through a cranial burr hole. Herein, we demonstrate the first use of this technology in a progressive atypical sphenoid wing meningioma for a previously resected and irradiated tumor. Case Description A 47-year-old female was diagnosed with a left-sided atypical meningioma, the WHO 2, of the sphenoid wing following acute worsening of bitemporal headache and dizziness. Given neurovascular involvement, a subtotal resection was performed, followed by stereotactic radiosurgery. Following progression 9 months from resection, the patient elected to proceed with LITT. The patient's postoperative course was uncomplicated and she remains progression free at 24 months following LITT. Conclusion We present the first use of LITT for a sphenoid wing meningioma documented in the literature, which demonstrated enhanced disease control for a lesion that was refractory to both surgery and radiation. LITT could represent an additional option for local control of progressive meningiomas, even in locations that are challenging to access surgically. More evidence is needed regarding the technical nuances of LITT for lesions of the skull base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aden P. Haskell-Mendoza
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Ethan S. Srinivasan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Alexander D. Suarez
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Peter E. Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States
- Corresponding author: Peter E. Fecci, MD, PhD, Professor of Neurosurgery, Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Carpenter DJ, Fairchild AT, Adamson JD, Fecci PE, Sampson JH, Herndon JE, Torok JA, Mullikin TC, Kim GJ, Reitman ZJ, Kirkpatrick JP, Floyd SR. Outcomes in Patients with Intact and Resected Brain Metastasis Treated with 5-Fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 8:101166. [PMID: 36845614 PMCID: PMC9943776 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (HF-SRS) with or without surgical resection is potentially a preferred treatment for larger or symptomatic brain metastases (BMs). Herein, we report clinical outcomes and predictive factors following HF-SRS. Methods and Materials Patients undergoing HF-SRS for intact (iHF-SRS) or resected (rHF-SRS) BMs from 2008 to 2018 were retrospectively identified. Linear accelerator-based image-guided HF-SRS consisted of 5 fractions at 5, 5.5, or 6 Gy per fraction. Time to local progression (LP), time to distant brain progression (DBP), and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Cox models assessed effect of clinical factors on OS. Fine and Gray's cumulative incidence model for competing events examined effect of factors on LP and DBP. The occurrence of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) was determined. Logistic regression examined predictors of LMD. Results Among 445 patients, median age was 63.5 years; 87% had Karnofsky performance status ≥70. Fifty-three % of patients underwent surgical resection, and 75% received 5 Gy per fraction. Patients with resected BMs had higher Karnofsky performance status (90-100, 41 vs 30%), less extracranial disease (absent, 25 vs 13%), and fewer BMs (multiple, 32 vs 67%). Median diameter of the dominant BM was 3.0 cm (interquartile range, 1.8-3.6 cm) for intact BMs and 4.6 cm (interquartile range, 3.9-5.5 cm) for resected BMs. Median OS was 5.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3-6.0) following iHF-SRS and 12.8 months (95% CI, 10.8-16.2) following rHF-SRS (P < .01). Cumulative LP incidence was 14.5% at 18 months (95% CI, 11.4-18.0%), significantly associated with greater total GTV (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05-1.20) following iFR-SRS, and with recurrent versus newly diagnosed BMs across all patients (hazard ratio, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.01-5.15). Cumulative DBP incidence was significantly greater following rHF-SRS than iHF-SRS (P = .01), with respective 24-month rates of 50.0 (95% CI, 43.3-56.3) and 35.7% (95% CI, 29.2-42.2). LMD (57 events total; 33% nodular, 67% diffuse) was observed in 17.1% of rHF-SRS and 8.1% of iHF-SRS cases (odds ratio, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.34-4.53). Any radionecrosis and grade 2+ radionecrosis events were observed in 14 and 8% of cases, respectively. Conclusions HF-SRS demonstrated favorable rates of LC and radionecrosis in postoperative and intact settings. Corresponding LMD and RN rates were comparable to those of other studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J. Carpenter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina,Corresponding author: Scott Floyd, MD, PhD
| | | | - Justus D. Adamson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Peter E. Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - John H. Sampson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - James E. Herndon
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jordan A. Torok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Clair Hospital Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Trey C. Mullikin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Grace J. Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Zachary J. Reitman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - John P. Kirkpatrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina,Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Scott R. Floyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schwalb AM, Srinivasan ES, Fecci PE. Commentary: Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for First-Line Treatment of Surgically Accessible Recurrent Glioblastoma: Outcomes Compared With a Surgical Cohort. Neurosurgery 2022; 91:e160-e163. [PMID: 36377926 PMCID: PMC9632939 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Allison M. Schwalb
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ethan S. Srinivasan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Peter E. Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA;,Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fecci PE, Rao G, Brastianos PK, Dunn GP, Anders CK. Editorial: It takes a village: The expanding multi-disciplinary approach to brain metastasis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1054490. [PMID: 36338769 PMCID: PMC9627329 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1054490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Peter E. Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
- Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Durham, NC, United States
- *Correspondence: Peter E. Fecci,
| | - Ganesh Rao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Priscilla K. Brastianos
- Central Nervous System Metastasis Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Gavin P. Dunn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Carey K. Anders
- Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Neman J, Saatian B, Herrera R, Martirosian V, Eisenbarth R, Iyer M, Julian A, Lowman A, LaViolette P, Remsik J, Boire A, Sankey E, Fecci PE, Shiroishi M, Chow F, Hurth K. BSCI-12 BREAST TO BRAIN METASTASIS IS EXACERBATED WITH CHEMOTHERAPY THROUGH BLOOD-CEREBRAL SPINAL FLUID-BARRIER AND INDUCES ALZHEIMER’S-LIKE PATHOLOGY. Neurooncol Adv 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac078.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Control of breast to brain metastasis remains an urgent unmet clinical need. While chemotherapies are essential in reducing systemic tumor burden, they have also shown to promote non-brain metastatic invasiveness and drug-driven neurocognitive deficits through formation of neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) independently. Now, in this study we investigated the effect of chemotherapy on brain metastatic progression and promoting tumor-mediated NFT. Results show chemotherapies promote increased brain-barrier permeability and facilitate enhanced tumor infiltration, particularly through the blood-cerebrospinal fluid-barrier (BCSFB). This is attributed to increased expression of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) which, in turn, mediates loss of Claudin-6 within the choroid plexus cells of the BCSFB. Importantly, increased MMP9 activity in the choroid epithelium following chemotherapy results in cleavage of Tau released from breast cancer cells. This cleaved Tau forms tumor-derived NFT that further destabilize the BCSFB. Our results underline for the first time the importance of the BCSFB as a vulnerable point of entry for brain-seeking tumor cells post-chemotherapy and indicate that tumor cells themselves contribute to Alzheimer’s-like tauopathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jan Remsik
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, NY , USA
| | - Adrienne Boire
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, NY , USA
| | - E Sankey
- Duke University , Durham, NC , USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lerner EC, Srinivasan ES, Broadwater G, Haskell-Mendoza AP, Edwards RM, Huie D, Vaios EJ, Floyd SR, Adamson JD, Fecci PE. Factors Associated with New-Onset Seizures Following Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Newly Diagnosed Brain Metastases. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:101054. [PMID: 36420187 PMCID: PMC9677187 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a highly effective therapy for newly diagnosed brain metastases. Prophylactic antiepileptic drugs are no longer routinely used in current SRS practice, owing to a perceived low overall frequency of new-onset seizures and potential side effects of medications. It is nonetheless desirable to prevent unwanted side effects following SRS. Risk factors for new-onset seizures after SRS have not been well established. As such, we aimed to characterize variables associated with increased seizure risk. Methods and Materials Patients treated with SRS for newly diagnosed brain metastases between 2013 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed at a single institution. Data on baseline demographics, radiation parameters, and clinical courses were collected. Results The cohort consisted of 305 patients treated with SRS without prior seizure history. Median age and baseline Karnofsky Performance Scale score were 64 years (interquartile range, 55-70) and 80 (interquartile range, 80-90), respectively. Twenty-six (8.5%) patients developed new-onset seizures within 3 months of SRS. There was no association between new-onset seizures and median baseline Karnofsky Performance Scale score, prior resection, or prior whole brain radiation therapy. There were significant differences in the combined total irradiated volume (12.5 vs 3.7 cm3, P < .001), maximum single lesion volume (8.8 vs 2.8 cm3, P = .003), lesion diameter (3.2 vs 2.0 cm, P = .003), and number of lesions treated (3 vs 1, P = .018) between patients with and without new-onset seizures, respectively. On multivariate logistic regression, total irradiated volume (odds ratio, 1.09 for every 1-cm1 increase in total volume; confidence interval, 1.02-1.17; P = .016) and pre-SRS neurologic symptoms (odds ratio, 3.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-7.99; P = .020) were both significantly correlated with odds of seizures following SRS. Conclusions Our data suggest that larger total treatment volume and the presence of focal neurologic deficits at presentation are associated with new-onset seizures within 3 months of SRS. High-risk patients undergoing SRS may benefit from counseling or prophylactic antiseizure therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gloria Broadwater
- Cancer Statistical Center, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | | - David Huie
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Eugene J. Vaios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Scott R. Floyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Justus D. Adamson
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Peter E. Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Corresponding author: Peter E. Fecci, MD, PhD
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lerner E, D'Anniballe V, Tomaszewski W, Perera J, Cui X, Waibl-Polania J, Wilkinson D, Gunn MD, Fecci PE, Woroniecka K. Abstract 1378: CD8 T cell mediated killing of MHC class 1 negative tumors requires antigen presenting myeloid cells and interferon gamma. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-1378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) Class I downregulation is a well described mechanism of tumor immune escape, posing a challenge for T cell based immunotherapies including immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). Recent studies, however, have demonstrated mixed roles of MHC Class 1 and the critical component beta-2-microglobulin (β2m) expression in cancer progression and ICB response, with some studies showing inactivation of antigen presentation to be associated with resistance to ICB and others showing low β2m expression to be associated with favorable prognosis. Glioblastoma (GBM) in particular expresses little or no MHC Class 1 and patients remain unresponsive to ICB. We thus sought to evaluate the role of MHC Class 1 in ICB, given that we have previously demonstrated that combination ICB with anti-PD-1 and co-stimulation with 4-1BB agonism has marked efficacy against intracranial murine glioma tumors in a CD8 T cell dependent manner. Surprisingly, in a CT2A murine glioma tumor line expressing the antigen TRP2 and lacking cell surface MHC I (CT2A-TRP2-β2mKO), the efficacy of combination 4-1BB and PD-1 therapy (ICB) was re-demonstrated in a CD8 dependent manner, independent of NK cells, CD4 T cells, and B cells. Furthermore, the efficacy of immunotherapy against intracranial CT2A-TRP2-β2mKO was demonstrated to be antigen dependent, with an adoptive lymphocyte transfer (ALT) of TRP2 TCR transduced T cells (TRP2 T cells) into a CD8KO mouse sufficient to eliminate CT2A-TRP2-β2mKO in the setting of ICB. Additionally, an ALT of TRP2 T cells did not kill CT2A-β2mKO tumors in the setting of ICB, while OT-1 mice whose CD8+ T cells primarily recognize OVA peptide with CT2A-TRP2-β2mKO tumors did not respond to ICB. In vitro studies revealed that TRP2 T cells demonstrated anti-tumor cytotoxicity against MHC Class I negative CT2A-TRP2-β2mKO tumor cells in the presence of TRP2 loaded bone marrow derived macrophages (TRP2 Mφ), but neither cell type was individually sufficient to induce tumor cell death, while the combination of TRP2 T cells and TRP2 Mφ demonstrated no cytotoxicity against CT2A-β2mKO tumors. Transwell experiments in which TRP2 Mφ and CT2A-TRP2-β2mKO tumor cells were separated by a 0.5µm membrane permeable to T cells but not Mφ or tumor cells revealed that contact between TRP2 Mφ and tumor cells was not necessary to induce T cell dependent killing. Indeed, tumor-bearing β2mKO bone marrow chimeras lacking MHC class 1 on hematopoeitically derived cells did not respond to ICB, highlighting the importance of antigen presentation from myeloid cells. The mechanism of killing was found to be dependent on interferon gamma (IFNγ), as IFNγKO mice did not respond to ICB. These findings demonstrate that tumors with low MHC Class 1 expression may still be targeted by T cell dependent immunotherapies such as ICB when antigen presentation can occur from myeloid cells.
Citation Format: Emily Lerner, Vincent D'Anniballe, William Tomaszewski, Jonathan Perera, Xiuyu Cui, Jessica Waibl-Polania, Daniel Wilkinson, Michael D. Gunn, Peter E. Fecci, Karolina Woroniecka. CD8 T cell mediated killing of MHC class 1 negative tumors requires antigen presenting myeloid cells and interferon gamma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1378.
Collapse
|
21
|
Grabowski MM, Srinivasan ES, Vaios EJ, Sankey EW, Otvos B, Krivosheya D, Scott A, Olufawo M, Ma J, Fomchenko EI, Herndon JE, Kim AH, Chiang VL, Chen CC, Leuthardt EC, Barnett GH, Kirkpatrick JP, Mohammadi AM, Fecci PE. Combination Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy Plus Stereotactic Radiotherapy (SRT) Increases Time to Progression for Biopsy-Proven Recurrent Brain Metastases. Neurooncol Adv 2022; 4:vdac086. [PMID: 35795470 PMCID: PMC9248774 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Improved survival for patients with brain metastases has been accompanied by a rise in tumor recurrence after stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has emerged as an effective treatment for SRT failures as an alternative to open resection or repeat SRT. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of LITT followed by SRT (LITT+SRT) in recurrent brain metastases. Methods A multicenter, retrospective study was performed of patients who underwent treatment for biopsy-proven brain metastasis recurrence after SRT at an academic medical center. Patients were stratified by “planned LITT+SRT” versus “LITT alone” versus “repeat SRT alone.” Index lesion progression was determined by modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria. Results Fifty-five patients met inclusion criteria, with a median follow-up of 7.3 months (range: 1.0–30.5), age of 60 years (range: 37–86), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) of 80 (range: 60–100), and pre-LITT/biopsy contrast-enhancing volume of 5.7 cc (range: 0.7–19.4). Thirty-eight percent of patients underwent LITT+SRT, 45% LITT alone, and 16% SRT alone. Median time to index lesion progression (29.8, 7.5, and 3.7 months [P = .022]) was significantly improved with LITT+SRT. When controlling for age in a multivariate analysis, patients treated with LITT+SRT remained significantly less likely to have index lesion progression (P = .004). Conclusions These data suggest that LITT+SRT is superior to LITT or repeat SRT alone for treatment of biopsy-proven brain metastasis recurrence after SRT failure. Prospective trials are warranted to validate the efficacy of using combination LITT+SRT for treatment of recurrent brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew M Grabowski
- Corresponding Author: Matthew M. Grabowski, MD, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave. S4, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA ()
| | - Ethan S Srinivasan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Eugene J Vaios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Eric W Sankey
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Balint Otvos
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic & Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Daria Krivosheya
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic & Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Alex Scott
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Michael Olufawo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jun Ma
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Elena I Fomchenko
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - James E Herndon
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Albert H Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Veronica L Chiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Clark C Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Eric C Leuthardt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Gene H Barnett
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic & Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - John P Kirkpatrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alireza M Mohammadi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic & Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lerner EC, Edwards RM, Wilkinson DS, Fecci PE. Laser ablation: Heating up the anti-tumor response in the intracranial compartment. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2022; 185:114311. [PMID: 35489652 PMCID: PMC10589123 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Immunotherapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI), have had limited success in treating intracranial malignancies. These failures are due partly to the restrictive blood-brain-barrier (BBB), the profound tumor-dependent induction of local and systemic immunosuppression, and immune evasion exhibited by these tumors. Therefore, novel approaches must be explored that aim to overcome these stringent barriers. LITT is an emerging treatment for brain tumors that utilizes thermal ablation to kill tumor cells. LITT provides an additional therapeutic benefit by synergizing with ICI and systemic chemotherapies to strengthen the anti-tumor immune response. This synergistic relationship involves transient disruption of the BBB and local augmentation of immune function, culminating in increased CNS drug penetrance and improved anti-tumor immunity. In this review, we will provide an overview of the challenges facing immunotherapy for brain tumors, and discuss how LITT may synergize with the endogenous anti-tumor response to improve the efficacy of ICI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily C Lerner
- Duke Medical School, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Ryan M Edwards
- Duke Medical School, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Daniel S Wilkinson
- Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Singh K, Foster M, Miller ES, Gregory S, Weinhold KJ, Ashley DM, Desjardins A, Low J, Peters KB, Severance E, Jaggers D, Friedman HS, Johnson MO, Friedman AH, Keir ST, Herndon JE, Li CY, Fecci PE, Sampson JH, Khasraw M. A phase 0/surgical window-of-opportunity study in progress, evaluating evolocumab in patients with high-grade glioma or glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.tps2076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS2076 Background: High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are immunologically ‘cold’ tumors. This phenomenon is partly due to reduced expression of major histocompatibility class (MHC) I on the surface of tumor cells, which prevents CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity (CTLs). Blockade of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) increases MHC class I expression, enhances CTL tumoral infiltration, and potentiates checkpoint inhibition in vivo. Evolocumab is an FDA-approved fully human IgG2 monoclonal antibody PCSK9 inhibitor which is clinically indicated for hyperlipidemia. This study seeks to determine whether evolocumab can cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and enhance MHC I expression on resected tumor cells, serving as a potential future adjunct for immunotherapy. Methods: This study will enroll ten patients over 18 years who have newly diagnosed or recurrent HGG. These patients will also need to be undergoing resection of their tumor as part of their planned treatment pathway. Following informed consent, patients will receive evolocumab (420mg, subcutaneously) 7-14 days before surgical debulking of the tumor. We will collect tissue which is not required for histological tumor analysis and compare it with a contemporaneous matched control cohort. This will consist of resected tumor specimens from patients not treated with evolocumab. Quantification of the drug will be performed using mass spectroscopy, flow cytometry, and single-cell sequencing. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether evolocumab can cross the BBB and be measured in resected tumor specimens taken from patients with HGG. Secondary objectives include an analysis of lipid metabolism and MHC-I expression on the tumor via flow cytometry and CITEseq. Wilcoxon rank-sum test or a two-sample t-test, will compare groups for these endpoints. Exploratory analyses will determine if evolocumab leads to changes in tumorigenic pathways and the immune profile of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Bioinformatic analyses will be performed using protein set enrichment, gene ontology (GO) annotations, and search tools from the retrieval of interactive genes/proteins (STRING). Progress: The study was activated on 10/04/2021 (NCT04937413) and at the time of submission has enrolled 5 participants (4 to control arm, 1 to intervention arm). Clinical trial information: NCT04937413.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirit Singh
- Duke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - James Emmett Herndon
- Duke Cancer Institute Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Durham, NC
| | - Chuan-Yuan Li
- Duke University Hospital Center, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lerner EC, Tomaszewski W, D’Anniballe V, Perera J, Cui X, Wilkinson DS, Waibl-Polania J, Gunn M, Fecci PE, Woroniecka K. CD8 T cells licensed with immune checkpoint blockade kill murine tumors lacking MHC-I. The Journal of Immunology 2022. [DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.208.supp.121.14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
MHC-I downregulation is a well described mechanism of tumor immune escape. Thus, targeting tumors with low or no MHC-I expression remains a significant challenge for T cell-based immunotherapies, including immune checkpoint blockade (ICB).
We previously demonstrated that the combination of PD-1 blockade and 4-1BB agonism has marked efficacy against intracranial murine CT2A glioma in a CD8 T cell-dependent manner. Surprisingly, this combination therapy remained effective in a β2 microglobulin knockout CT2A line overexpressing TRP2 (CT2A-TRP2-β2mKO). These tumors lack MHC-I but retain the Trp2 rejection antigen. Remarkably, the persisting efficacy remained dependent on CD8 T cells, but independent of NK cells, CD4 T cells, and B cells. Furthermore, the efficacy was demonstrated to be antigen-specific in vivo, as adoptively transferred Trp2-specific T cells prolonged survival of mice bearing CT2A-TRP2-β2mKO tumors, but not those bearing CT2A-β2mKO, which lacked the TRP2 antigen.
To analyze the mechanism driving antigen-dependent killing of tumor cells lacking MHC-I, we performed a series of in vitro cytotoxicity experiments using Trp2-specific T cells in the presence or absence of Trp2 antigen-loaded bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM). These studies demonstrated that in the absence of BMDM, Trp2-specific T cells efficiently killed MHC-I-expressing CT2A-Trp2, but failed to kill MHC-I deficient CT2A-Trp2-B2mKO tumors. However, killing was restored in the presence of Trp2 loaded BMDMs; the latter of which possessed little to no cytotoxic effect alone. These findings suggest a novel role for myeloid populations in mediating the influence of ICB on T cell function and challenge the traditional model of T cell tumor killing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Michael Gunn
- 6Department of Cardiology, Duke Univ. Sch. of Med
| | - Peter E Fecci
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, Duke Univ. Sch. of Med
- 8Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Duke Univ. Sch. of Med
- 9Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke Univ. Sch. of Med
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Wilkinson DS, Ryan K, Wilson J, Chandramohan V, Landi D, Bigner D, Fecci PE. D2C7 CAR: A novel CAR T cell that simultaneously targets wildtype EGFR and its mutant isoform EGFRvIII for treatment of glioma. The Journal of Immunology 2022. [DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.208.supp.122.03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Brain tumors are the leading cause of cancer death in children and a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in adults. Conventional treatments are suboptimal, thus signifying the need for novel therapeutic strategies, such as immunotherapy. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells represent a revolutionary class of immunotherapy, achieving considerable success in eliminating hematological cancers but generally failing to control solid tumors in part due to the lack of a suitably-expressed target antigen. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is the most ubiquitous and homogeneous antigen on glial brain tumors, and EGFR-directed therapies have been hotly pursued. Moreover, the mutant EGFR variant, EGFRvIII, is present on a subset of pediatric and adult high grade gliomas, representing a targetable, tumor-specific antigen. Unfortunately, CAR T cells targeting EGFRvIII fail to treat tumors possessing as few as 5–10% EGFRvIII-negative cells due to antigen escape. Thus, a CAR T cell that can target both EGFR and EGFRvIII is expected to be superior to a CAR that targets EGFRvIII alone. In this study, we developed a novel third generation CAR T cell consisting of the D2C7scfv targeting moiety that binds a shared epitope between EGFR and EGFRvIII. This D2C7 CAR was able to specifically and potently kill tumor cells expressing wildtype EGFR or EGFRvIII. Importantly, D2C7 CAR significantly prolonged survival of mice bearing EGFR or EGFRvIII-expressing gliomas of both adult (U87) and pediatric (DAOY) origin. Toxicity experiments involving EGFR-expressing human skin grafts provided evidence that D2C7 CAR is safe and effective when administered intracranially to mice bearing intracranial tumors.
Collapse
|
26
|
de Groot JF, Kim AH, Prabhu S, Rao G, Laxton AW, Fecci PE, O’Brien BJ, Sloan A, Chiang V, Tatter SB, Mohammadi AM, Placantonakis DG, Strowd RE, Chen C, Hadjipanayis C, Khasraw M, Sun D, Piccioni D, Sinicrope KD, Campian JL, Kurz SC, Williams B, Smith K, Tovar-Spinoza Z, Leuthardt EC. Efficacy of Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT) for Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent IDH Wild-type Glioblastoma. Neurooncol Adv 2022; 4:vdac040. [PMID: 35611270 PMCID: PMC9122789 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Treatment options for unresectable new and recurrent glioblastoma remain limited. Laser ablation has demonstrated safety as a surgical approach to treat primary brain tumors. The LAANTERN prospective multicenter registry (NCT02392078) data was analyzed to determine clinical outcomes for patients with new and recurrent IDH wild-type glioblastoma.
Methods
Demographics, intraprocedural data, adverse events, KPS, health-economics, and survival data were prospectively collected then analyzed on IDH wild-type newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma patients who were treated with laser ablation at 14 US centers between January 2016 and May 2019. Data was monitored for accuracy. Statistical analysis included individual variable summaries, multivariable differences in survival, and median survival numbers.
Results
A total of 29 new and 60 recurrent IDH wild-type WHO grade 4 glioblastoma patients were treated. Positive MGMT promoter methylation status was present in 5/29 of new and 23/60 of recurrent patients. Median physician-estimated extent of ablation was 91-99%. Median overall-survival was 9.73 months (95% confidence interval: 5.16, 15.91) for newly diagnosed patients and median post-procedure survival was 8.97 (6.94, 12.36) months for recurrent patients. Median overall-survival for newly diagnosed patients receiving post-LITT chemo/radiation was 16.14 months (6.11, not reached). Factors associated with improved survival were MGMT promoter methylation, adjuvant chemotherapy within 12 weeks, and tumor volume <3cc.
Conclusions
Laser ablation is a viable option for patients with new and recurrent glioblastoma. Median overall survival for IDH wild type newly diagnosed glioblastoma is comparable to outcomes observed in other tumor resection studies when those patients undergo radiation and chemotherapy following LITT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John F de Groot
- Department of Neuro-Oncology
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, San Francisco, CA
| | - Albert H Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Sujit Prabhu
- Department of Neurosurgery
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ganesh Rao
- Department of Neurosurgery
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Adrian W Laxton
- Department of Neurosurgery
- Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Barbara J O’Brien
- Department of Neuro-Oncology
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Andrew Sloan
- Department of Neurosurgery
- University Hospitals – Cleveland Medical Center & Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH
| | - Veronica Chiang
- Department of Neurosurgery
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Stephen B Tatter
- Department of Neurosurgery
- Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Alireza M Mohammadi
- Department of Neurosurgery
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine at CWRU, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Roy E Strowd
- Department of Neuro-Oncology
- Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Clark Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery
- University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN
| | | | - Mustafa Khasraw
- Department of Neuro-Oncology
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - David Sun
- Department of Neurosurgery
- Norton Neuroscience Institute, Louisville, KY
| | - David Piccioni
- Department of Neuro-Oncology
- University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA
| | - Kaylyn D Sinicrope
- Department of Neuro-Oncology
- Norton Neuroscience Institute, Louisville, KY
| | | | - Sylvia C Kurz
- Department of Neuro-Oncology
- NYU Langone Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Brian Williams
- Department of Neurosurgery
- University of Louisville Health, Louisville, KY
| | - Kris Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | - Eric C Leuthardt
- Department of Neurosurgery
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bramall AN, Anton ES, Kahle KT, Fecci PE. Navigating the ventricles: Novel insights into the pathogenesis of hydrocephalus. EBioMedicine 2022; 78:103931. [PMID: 35306341 PMCID: PMC8933686 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Congenital hydrocephalus occurs in one in 500-1000 babies born in the United States and acquired hydrocephalus may occur as the consequence of stroke, intraventricular and subarachnoid hemorrhage, traumatic brain injuries, brain tumors, craniectomy or may be idiopathic, as in the case of normal pressure hydrocephalus. Irrespective of its prevalence and significant impact on quality of life, neurosurgeons still rely on invasive cerebrospinal fluid shunt systems for the treatment of hydrocephalus that are exceptionally prone to failure and/or infection. Further understanding of this process at a molecular level, therefore, may have profound implications for improving treatment and quality of life for millions of individuals worldwide. The purpose of this article is to review the current research landscape on hydrocephalus with a focus on recent advances in our understanding of cerebrospinal fluid pathways from an evolutionary, genetics and molecular perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexa N Bramall
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Hospital, 2301 Erwin Rd., Durham, NC 27710, United States.
| | - E S Anton
- UNC Neuroscience Center and the Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Kristopher T Kahle
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Hospital, 2301 Erwin Rd., Durham, NC 27710, United States
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sankey EW, Grabowski MM, Srinivasan ES, Griffin AS, Howell EP, Otvos B, Tsvankin V, Barnett GH, Mohammadi AM, Fecci PE. Time to Steroid Independence After Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy vs Medical Management for Treatment of Biopsy-Proven Radiation Necrosis Secondary to Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastasis. Neurosurgery 2022; 90:684-690. [DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000001922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
|
29
|
Shen E, Van Swearingen AED, Price MJ, Bulsara K, Verhaak RGW, Baëta C, Painter BD, Reitman ZJ, Salama AKS, Clarke JM, Anders CK, Fecci PE, Goodwin CR, Walsh KM. A Need for More Molecular Profiling in Brain Metastases. Front Oncol 2022; 11:785064. [PMID: 35145903 PMCID: PMC8821807 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.785064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
As local disease control improves, the public health impact of brain metastases (BrM) continues to grow. Molecular features are frequently different between primary and metastatic tumors as a result of clonal evolution during neoplasm migration, selective pressures imposed by systemic treatments, and differences in the local microenvironment. However, biomarker information in BrM is not routinely obtained despite emerging evidence of its clinical value. We review evidence of discordance in clinically actionable biomarkers between primary tumors, extracranial metastases, and BrM. Although BrM biopsy/resection imposes clinical risks, these risks must be weighed against the potential benefits of assessing biomarkers in BrM. First, new treatment targets unique to a patient's BrM may be identified. Second, as BrM may occur late in a patient's disease course, resistance to initial targeted therapies and/or loss of previously identified biomarkers can occur by the time of occult BrM, rendering initial and other targeted therapies ineffective. Thus, current biomarker data can inform real-time treatment options. Third, biomarker information in BrM may provide useful prognostic information for patients. Appreciating the importance of biomarker analyses in BrM tissue, including how it may identify specific drivers of BrM, is critical for the development of more effective treatment strategies to improve outcomes for this growing patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica Shen
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, United States
- The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, United States
| | - Amanda E. D. Van Swearingen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Meghan J. Price
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Ketan Bulsara
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, United States
| | - Roeland G. W. Verhaak
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, United States
- The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VU) University Medical Center (VUmc), Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - César Baëta
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Brice D. Painter
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Zachary J. Reitman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - April K. S. Salama
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Jeffrey M. Clarke
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Carey K. Anders
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Peter E. Fecci
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - C. Rory Goodwin
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Kyle M. Walsh
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Waibl Polania J, Lerner EC, Wilkinson DS, Hoyt-Miggelbrink A, Fecci PE. Pushing Past the Blockade: Advancements in T Cell-Based Cancer Immunotherapies. Front Immunol 2021; 12:777073. [PMID: 34868044 PMCID: PMC8636733 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.777073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Successful cancer immunotherapies rely on a replete and functional immune compartment. Within the immune compartment, T cells are often the effector arm of immune-based strategies due to their potent cytotoxic capabilities. However, many tumors have evolved a variety of mechanisms to evade T cell-mediated killing. Thus, while many T cell-based immunotherapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, have achieved considerable success in some solid cancers and hematological malignancies, these therapies often fail in solid tumors due to tumor-imposed T cell dysfunctions. These dysfunctional mechanisms broadly include reduced T cell access into and identification of tumors, as well as an overall immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment that elicits T cell exhaustion. Therefore, novel, rational approaches are necessary to overcome the barriers to T cell function elicited by solid tumors. In this review, we will provide an overview of conventional immunotherapeutic strategies and the various barriers to T cell anti-tumor function encountered in solid tumors that lead to resistance. We will also explore a sampling of emerging strategies specifically aimed to bypass these tumor-imposed boundaries to T cell-based immunotherapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emily C Lerner
- Duke Medical School, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Daniel S Wilkinson
- Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | | | - Peter E Fecci
- Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive treatment for intracranial lesions entailing thermal ablation via a stereotactically placed laser probe. In metastatic disease, it has shown the most promise in the treatment of radiographically progressive lesions after initial stereotactic radiosurgery, whether due to recurrent metastatic disease or radiation necrosis. LITT has been demonstrated to provide clinical benefit in both cases, as discussed in the review below. With its minimal surgical footprint and short recovery period, LITT is further advantaged for patients who are otherwise high-risk surgical candidates or with lesions in difficult to access locations. Exploration of the current data on its use in metastatic disease will allow for a better understanding of the indications, benefits, and future directions of LITT for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matthew M Grabowski
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic & Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Brian V Nahed
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gene H Barnett
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic & Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Miggelbrink AM, Jackson JD, Lorrey SJ, Srinivasan ES, Waibl-Polania J, Wilkinson DS, Fecci PE. CD4 T-Cell Exhaustion: Does It Exist and What Are Its Roles in Cancer? Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:5742-5752. [PMID: 34127507 PMCID: PMC8563372 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-0206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
In chronic infections and in cancer, persistent antigen stimulation under suboptimal conditions can lead to the induction of T-cell exhaustion. Exhausted T cells are characterized by an increased expression of inhibitory markers and a progressive and hierarchical loss of function. Although cancer-induced exhaustion in CD8 T cells has been well-characterized and identified as a therapeutic target (i.e., via checkpoint inhibition), in-depth analyses of exhaustion in other immune cell types, including CD4 T cells, is wanting. While perhaps attributable to the contextual discovery of exhaustion amidst chronic viral infection, the lack of thorough inquiry into CD4 T-cell exhaustion is particularly surprising given their important role in orchestrating immune responses through T-helper and direct cytotoxic functions. Current work suggests that CD4 T-cell exhaustion may indeed be prevalent, and as CD4 T cells have been implicated in various disease pathologies, such exhaustion is likely to be clinically relevant. Defining phenotypic exhaustion in the various CD4 T-cell subsets and how it influences immune responses and disease severity will be crucial to understanding collective immune dysfunction in a variety of pathologies. In this review, we will discuss mechanistic and clinical evidence for CD4 T-cell exhaustion in cancer. Further insight into the derivation and manifestation of exhaustive processes in CD4 T cells could reveal novel therapeutic targets to abrogate CD4 T-cell exhaustion in cancer and induce a robust antitumor immune response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra M. Miggelbrink
- Duke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.,Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Joshua D. Jackson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Selena J. Lorrey
- Duke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.,Department of Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ethan S. Srinivasan
- Duke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.,Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jessica Waibl-Polania
- Duke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.,Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Daniel S. Wilkinson
- Duke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Peter E. Fecci
- Duke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.,Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.,Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.,Department of Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.,Corresponding Author: Peter E. Fecci, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke Medical Center, DUMC Box 3050, Durham, NC 27705. Phone: 919–681–1010; E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kang JH, Price M, Dalton T, Ramirez L, Fecci PE, Kamal AH, Johnson MO, Peters KB, Goodwin CR. Palliative Care Use for Critically Ill Patients With Brain Metastases. J Pain Symptom Manage 2021; 62:927-935. [PMID: 33992757 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Critically ill patients with brain metastases (BM) face significant uncertainty regarding prognosis and survival and can benefit from Palliative care (PC). However, research regarding the role of PC in this population is lacking. OBJECTIVES We sought to compare BM patients admitted to an intensive care unit who received an inpatient PC consult (PC cohort) to those who did not (Usual Care, UC cohort). METHODS We performed a single-institution retrospective cohort analysis. Our outcome variables were mortality, time from intensive care unit admission to death, disposition, and change in code status. We also evaluated PC's role in complex medical decision making, symptom management and hospice education. RESULTS PC consult was placed in 31 of 118 (28%) of patients. The overall mortality rates were not statistically different (78.8% vs. 90.3%, P= 0.15, UC vs. PC cohort). Patients in the PC cohort had a shorter time to death, higher rate of death within 30 days of admission, increased rate of discharge to hospice, and increase percentage of code status change to "do not attempt resuscitation" during the admission. The primary services provided by PC were symptom management (n = 21, 67.7%) and assistance in complex medical decision making (n = 20, 64.5%). CONCLUSION In our patient cohort, PC is an underutilized service that can assist in complex medical decision making and symptom management of critically ill BM patients. Further prospective studies surveying patient, family and provider experiences could better inform the qualitative impact of PC in this unique patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer H Kang
- Department of Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, (J.H.K.) NC, USA.
| | - Meghan Price
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, (M.P., T.D.) NC, USA
| | - Tara Dalton
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, (M.P., T.D.) NC, USA
| | - Luis Ramirez
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, (L.R., P.E.F., M.O.J., K.B.P., C.R.G.) NC, USA
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, (L.R., P.E.F., M.O.J., K.B.P., C.R.G.) NC, USA
| | - Arif H Kamal
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, (A.H.K.) NC, USA
| | - Margaret O Johnson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, (L.R., P.E.F., M.O.J., K.B.P., C.R.G.) NC, USA
| | - Katherine B Peters
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, (L.R., P.E.F., M.O.J., K.B.P., C.R.G.) NC, USA
| | - Courtney R Goodwin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, (L.R., P.E.F., M.O.J., K.B.P., C.R.G.) NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Tomaszewski WH, Waibl-Polania J, Miggelbrink AM, Chakraborty MA, Fecci PE, Sampson JH, Gunn MD. Broad immunophenotyping of the murine brain tumor microenvironment. J Immunol Methods 2021; 499:113158. [PMID: 34597618 DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2021.113158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Here we present a 14-color flow cytometry panel for the evaluation of 13 myeloid and lymphoid populations within murine glioblastoma samples. Reagents, processing protocols, and downstream analyses were thoroughly validated and optimized to resolve the following populations: T cells (CD4, CD8, CD3), B cells (B220), NK cells (NK1.1), neutrophils (Ly6G), classical and non-classical monocytes (Ly6c, CD43), macrophages (F4/80, CD11b), microglia (CD45-lo, CD11b), and dendritic cells (DCs) (CD11c, MHC class II). In addition, this panel leaves Alexa Fluor 488/FITC open for the inclusion of fluorescent reporters or congenic marker staining.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W H Tomaszewski
- Duke School of Medicine, Department of Immunology, United States of America
| | - J Waibl-Polania
- Duke School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, United States of America
| | - A M Miggelbrink
- Duke School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, United States of America
| | - M A Chakraborty
- Duke School of Medicine, Department of Biomedical Engineering, United States of America
| | - P E Fecci
- Duke School or Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, United States of America
| | - J H Sampson
- Duke School or Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, United States of America
| | - M D Gunn
- Duke School of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Srinivasan ES, Tsvankin V, Fecci PE. Commentary: A Neurosurgeon's Guide to Cognitive Dysfunction in Adult Glioma. Neurosurgery 2021; 89:E1-E2. [PMID: 33289515 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
36
|
Mohan AA, Tomaszewski WH, Haskell-Mendoza AP, Hotchkiss KM, Singh K, Reedy JL, Fecci PE, Sampson JH, Khasraw M. Targeting Immunometabolism in Glioblastoma. Front Oncol 2021; 11:696402. [PMID: 34222022 PMCID: PMC8242259 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.696402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
We have only recently begun to understand how cancer metabolism affects antitumor responses and immunotherapy outcomes. Certain immunometabolic targets have been actively pursued in other tumor types, however, glioblastoma research has been slow to exploit the therapeutic vulnerabilities of immunometabolism. In this review, we highlight the pathways that are most relevant to glioblastoma and focus on how these immunometabolic pathways influence tumor growth and immune suppression. We discuss hypoxia, glycolysis, tryptophan metabolism, arginine metabolism, 2-Hydroxyglutarate (2HG) metabolism, adenosine metabolism, and altered phospholipid metabolism, in order to provide an analysis and overview of the field of glioblastoma immunometabolism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mustafa Khasraw
- Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Chongsathidkiet P, Fecci PE. Cold-inducible RNA-binding protein (CIRBP) as a biomarker to predict recurrence of brain metastases. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:1419-1420. [PMID: 34036364 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Pakawat Chongsathidkiet
- Department of Neurosurgery, Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center and Department of Pathology.,Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Nduom EK, Gephart MH, Chheda MG, Suva ML, Amankulor N, Battiste JD, Campian JL, Dacey RG, Das S, Fecci PE, Hadjipanayis CG, Hoang KB, Jalali A, Orringer D, Patel AJ, Placantonakis D, Rodriguez A, Yang I, Yu JS, Zipfel GJ, Dunn GP, Leuthardt EC, Kim AH. Re-evaluating Biopsy for Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Position Statement by the Christopher Davidson Forum Investigators. Neurosurgery 2021; 89:129-132. [PMID: 33862619 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyab063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) need bold new approaches to their treatment, yet progress has been hindered by a relative inability to dynamically track treatment response, mechanisms of resistance, evolution of targetable mutations, and changes in mutational burden. We are writing on behalf of a multidisciplinary group of academic neuro-oncology professionals who met at the collaborative Christopher Davidson Forum at Washington University in St Louis in the fall of 2019. We propose a dramatic but necessary change to the routine management of patients with GBM to advance the field: to routinely biopsy recurrent GBM at the time of presumed recurrence. Data derived from these samples will identify true recurrence vs treatment effect, avoid treatments with little chance of success, enable clinical trial access, and aid in the scientific advancement of our understanding of GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edjah K Nduom
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Melanie Hayden Gephart
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Milan G Chheda
- Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Mario L Suva
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nduka Amankulor
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - James D Battiste
- Department of Neurology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Jian L Campian
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Ralph G Dacey
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Sunit Das
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Kimberly B Hoang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ali Jalali
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Daniel Orringer
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Akash J Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Analiz Rodriguez
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Isaac Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jennifer S Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Biology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Greg J Zipfel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Gavin P Dunn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Eric C Leuthardt
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Albert H Kim
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Chuntova P, Chow F, Watchmaker PB, Galvez M, Heimberger AB, Newell EW, Diaz A, DePinho RA, Li MO, Wherry EJ, Mitchell D, Terabe M, Wainwright DA, Berzofsky JA, Herold-Mende C, Heath JR, Lim M, Margolin KA, Chiocca EA, Kasahara N, Ellingson BM, Brown CE, Chen Y, Fecci PE, Reardon DA, Dunn GP, Liau LM, Costello JF, Wick W, Cloughesy T, Timmer WC, Wen PY, Prins RM, Platten M, Okada H. Unique challenges for glioblastoma immunotherapy-discussions across neuro-oncology and non-neuro-oncology experts in cancer immunology. Meeting Report from the 2019 SNO Immuno-Oncology Think Tank. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:356-375. [PMID: 33367885 PMCID: PMC7992879 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy has made remarkable advances with over 50 separate Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals as first- or second-line indications since 2015. These include immune checkpoint blocking antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor-transduced T cells, and bispecific T-cell-engaging antibodies. While multiple cancer types now benefit from these immunotherapies, notable exceptions thus far include brain tumors, such as glioblastoma. As such, it seems critical to gain a better understanding of unique mechanistic challenges underlying the resistance of malignant gliomas to immunotherapy, as well as to acquire insights into the development of future strategies. An Immuno-Oncology Think Tank Meeting was held during the 2019 Annual Society for Neuro-Oncology Scientific Conference. Discussants in the fields of neuro-oncology, neurosurgery, neuro-imaging, medical oncology, and cancer immunology participated in the meeting. Sessions focused on topics such as the tumor microenvironment, myeloid cells, T-cell dysfunction, cellular engineering, and translational aspects that are critical and unique challenges inherent with primary brain tumors. In this review, we summarize the discussions and the key messages from the meeting, which may potentially serve as a basis for advancing the field of immune neuro-oncology in a collaborative manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavlina Chuntova
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, California
| | - Frances Chow
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Mildred Galvez
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Amy B Heimberger
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Evan W Newell
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Aaron Diaz
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, California
| | - Ronald A DePinho
- Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ming O Li
- Immunology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - E John Wherry
- Department of Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Duane Mitchell
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Masaki Terabe
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Derek A Wainwright
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jay A Berzofsky
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | | | - Michael Lim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Kim A Margolin
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - E Antonio Chiocca
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Christine E Brown
- Department of Immuno-Oncology, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, California
| | - Yvonne Chen
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology & Molecular Genetics, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - David A Reardon
- Department of Medicine/Medical Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Gavin P Dunn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Linda M Liau
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Wolfgang Wick
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Timothy Cloughesy
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - William C Timmer
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert M Prins
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, California
| | - Michael Platten
- Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, MCTN, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.,DKTK CCU Brain Tumor Immunology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hideho Okada
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, California.,Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Srinivasan ES, Tan AC, Anders CK, Pendergast AM, Sipkins DA, Ashley DM, Fecci PE, Khasraw M. Salting the Soil: Targeting the Microenvironment of Brain Metastases. Mol Cancer Ther 2021; 20:455-466. [PMID: 33402399 PMCID: PMC8041238 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-20-0579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Paget's "seed and soil" hypothesis of metastatic spread has acted as a foundation of the field for over a century, with continued evolution as mechanisms of the process have been elucidated. The central nervous system (CNS) presents a unique soil through this lens, relatively isolated from peripheral circulation and immune surveillance with distinct cellular and structural composition. Research in primary and metastatic brain tumors has demonstrated that this tumor microenvironment (TME) plays an essential role in the growth of CNS tumors. In each case, the cancerous cells develop complex and bidirectional relationships that reorganize the local TME and reprogram the CNS cells, including endothelial cells, pericytes, astrocytes, microglia, infiltrating monocytes, and lymphocytes. These interactions create a structurally and immunologically permissive TME with malignant processes promoting positive feedback loops and systemic consequences. Strategies to interrupt interactions with the native CNS components, on "salting the soil," to create an inhospitable environment are promising in the preclinical setting. This review aims to examine the general and specific pathways thus far investigated in brain metastases and related work in glioma to identify targetable mechanisms that may have general application across the spectrum of intracranial tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan S Srinivasan
- Duke Brain and Spine Metastases Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Aaron C Tan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Carey K Anders
- Duke Brain and Spine Metastases Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Dorothy A Sipkins
- Duke Brain and Spine Metastases Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - David M Ashley
- Duke Brain and Spine Metastases Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Duke Brain and Spine Metastases Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Mustafa Khasraw
- Duke Brain and Spine Metastases Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Price M, Howell EP, Dalton T, Ramirez L, Howell C, Williamson T, Fecci PE, Anders CK, Check DK, Kamal AH, Goodwin CR. Inpatient palliative care utilization for patients with brain metastases. Neurooncol Pract 2021; 8:441-450. [PMID: 34277022 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npab016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Given the high symptom burden and complex clinical decision making associated with a diagnosis of brain metastases (BM), specialty palliative care (PC) can meaningfully improve patient quality of life. However, no prior study has formally evaluated patient-specific factors associated with PC consultation among BM patients. Methods We examined the rates of PC consults in a cohort of 1303 patients with BM admitted to three tertiary medical centers from October 2015 to December 2018. Patient demographics, surgical status, 30-day readmission, and death data were collected via retrospective chart review. PC utilization was assessed by identifying encounters for which an inpatient consult to PC was placed. Statistical analyses were performed to compare characteristics and outcomes between patients who did and did not receive PC consults. Results We analyzed 1303 patients admitted to the hospital with BM. The average overall rate of inpatient PC consultation was 19.6%. Rates of PC utilization differed significantly by patient race (17.5% in White/Caucasian vs 26.0% in Black/African American patients, P = .0014). Patients who received surgery during their admission had significantly lower rates of PC consultation (3.9% vs 22.4%, P < .0001). Patients who either died during their admission or were discharged to hospice had significantly higher rates of PC than those who were discharged home or to rehabilitation (P < .0001). Conclusions In our dataset, PC consultation rates varied by patient demographic, surgical status, discharging service, and practice setting. Further work is needed to identify the specific barriers to optimally utilizing specialty PC in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan Price
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Elizabeth P Howell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Tara Dalton
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Luis Ramirez
- Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Claire Howell
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Theresa Williamson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Carey K Anders
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Devon K Check
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Arif H Kamal
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - C Rory Goodwin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
We have recently described a new murine model of glioblastoma, generated by the implantation of syngeneic glioblastoma stem cells into immunocompetent mice, that recapitulates the salient histopathological and immunological features of the human disease. We employed this model to demonstrate the multifaceted activity of an oncolytic herpes simplex virus genetically modified to express interleukin-12, G47∆-IL12.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tooba A Cheema
- Brain Tumor Research Center; Department of Neurosurgery; Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Boston, MA USA ; Momenta Pharmaceuticals; Cambridge, MA USA
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Brain Tumor Research Center; Department of Neurosurgery; Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Boston, MA USA
| | - Jianfang Ning
- Brain Tumor Research Center; Department of Neurosurgery; Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Boston, MA USA
| | - Samuel D Rabkin
- Brain Tumor Research Center; Department of Neurosurgery; Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Boston, MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Otvos B, Alban TJ, Grabowski MM, Bayik D, Mulkearns-Hubert EE, Radivoyevitch T, Rabljenovic A, Johnson S, Androjna C, Mohammadi AM, Barnett GH, Ahluwalia MS, Vogelbaum MA, Fecci PE, Lathia JD. Preclinical Modeling of Surgery and Steroid Therapy for Glioblastoma Reveals Changes in Immunophenotype that are Associated with Tumor Growth and Outcome. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:2038-2049. [PMID: 33542075 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-3262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Glioblastoma (GBM) immunotherapy clinical trials are generally initiated after standard-of-care treatment-including surgical resection, perioperative high-dose steroid therapy, chemotherapy, and radiation treatment-has either begun or failed. However, the impact of these interventions on the antitumoral immune response is not well studied. While discoveries regarding the impact of chemotherapy and radiation on immune response have been made and translated into clinical trial design, the impact of surgical resection and steroids on the antitumor immune response has yet to be determined. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We developed a murine model integrating tumor resection and steroid treatment and used flow cytometry to analyze systemic and local immune changes. These mouse model findings were validated in a cohort of 95 patients with primary GBM. RESULTS Using our murine resection model, we observed a systemic reduction in lymphocytes corresponding to increased tumor volume and decreased circulating lymphocytes that was masked by dexamethasone treatment. The reduction in circulating T cells was due to reduced CCR7 expression, resulting in T-cell sequestration in lymphoid organs and the bone marrow. We confirmed these findings in a cohort of patients with primary GBM and found that prior to steroid treatment, circulating lymphocytes inversely correlated with tumor volume. Finally, we demonstrated that peripheral lymphocyte content varies with progression-free survival and overall survival, independent of tumor volume, steroid use, or molecular profiles. CONCLUSIONS These data reveal that prior to intervention, increased tumor volume corresponds with reduced systemic immune function and that peripheral lymphocyte counts are prognostic when steroid treatment is taken into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Balint Otvos
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Tyler J Alban
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Molecular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Matthew M Grabowski
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Defne Bayik
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Erin E Mulkearns-Hubert
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Tomas Radivoyevitch
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Anja Rabljenovic
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Sarah Johnson
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Charlie Androjna
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Alireza M Mohammadi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Gene H Barnett
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Peter E Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Justin D Lathia
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. .,Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Molecular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.,Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The overall survival in patients with gliomas has not significantly increased in the modern era, despite advances such as immunotherapy. This is in part due to their notorious ability to suppress local and systemic immune responses, severely restricting treatment efficacy. METHODS We have reviewed the preclinical and clinical evidence for immunosuppression seen throughout the disease process in gliomas. This review aims to discuss the various ways that brain tumors, and gliomas in particular, co-opt the body's immune system to evade detection and ensure tumor survival and proliferation. RESULTS A multitude of mechanisms are discussed by which neoplastic cells evade detection and destruction by the immune system. These include tumor-induced T-cell and NK cell dysfunction, regulatory T-cell and myeloid-derived suppressor cell expansion, M2 phenotypic transformation in glioma-associated macrophages/microglia, upregulation of immunosuppressive glioma cell surface factors and cytokines, tumor microenvironment hypoxia, and iatrogenic sequelae of immunosuppressive treatments. CONCLUSIONS Gliomas create a profoundly immunosuppressive environment, both locally within the tumor and systemically. Future research should aim to address these immunosuppressive mechanisms in the effort to generate treatment options with meaningful survival benefits for this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew M Grabowski
- Duke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Duke University Medical Center, 303 Research Drive, 220 Sands Bldg, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Eric W Sankey
- Duke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Duke University Medical Center, 303 Research Drive, 220 Sands Bldg, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Katherine J Ryan
- Duke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Duke University Medical Center, 303 Research Drive, 220 Sands Bldg, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Pakawat Chongsathidkiet
- Duke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Duke University Medical Center, 303 Research Drive, 220 Sands Bldg, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Selena J Lorrey
- Duke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Duke University Medical Center, 303 Research Drive, 220 Sands Bldg, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Daniel S Wilkinson
- Duke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Duke University Medical Center, 303 Research Drive, 220 Sands Bldg, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Duke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Duke University Medical Center, 303 Research Drive, 220 Sands Bldg, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Adil SM, Hodges SE, Edwards RM, Charalambous LT, Yang Z, Kiyani M, Musick A, Parente BA, Lee HJ, Peters KB, Fecci PE, Lad SP. Health care resource utilization and treatment of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in the United States. Neurooncol Pract 2020; 7:636-645. [PMID: 33312678 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npaa041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The economic burden of cancer in the United States is substantial, and better understanding it is essential in informing health care policy and innovation. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) represents a late complication of primary cancer spreading to the leptomeninges. Methods The IBM MarketScan Research databases were queried for adults diagnosed with LC from 2001 to 2015, secondary to 4 primary cancers (breast, lung, gastrointestinal, and melanoma). Health care resource utilization (HCRU) and treatment utilization were quantified at baseline (1-year pre-LC diagnosis) and 30, 90, and 365 days post-LC diagnosis. Results We identified 4961 cases of LC (46.3% breast cancer, 34.8% lung cancer, 13.5% gastrointestinal cancer, and 5.4% melanoma). The median age was 57.0 years, with 69.7% female and 31.1% residing in the South. Insurance status included commercial (71.1%), Medicare (19.8%), and Medicaid (9.1%). Median follow-up was 66.0 days (25th percentile: 24.0, 75th percentile: 186.0) and total cumulative costs were highest for the gastrointestinal subgroup ($167 768) and lowest for the lung cancer subgroup ($145 244). There was considerable variation in the 89.6% of patients who used adjunctive treatments at 1 year, including chemotherapy (64.3%), radiotherapy (57.6%), therapeutic lumbar puncture (31.5%), and Ommaya reservoir (14.5%). The main cost drivers at 1 year were chemotherapy ($62 026), radiation therapy ($37 076), and specialty drugs ($29 330). The prevalence of neurologic impairments was 46.9%, including radiculopathy (15.0%), paresthesia (12.3%), seizure episode/convulsive disorder not otherwise specified (11.0%), and ataxia (8.0%). Conclusions LC is a devastating condition with an overall poor prognosis. We present the largest study of LC in this real-world study, including current treatments, with an emphasis on HCRU. There is considerable variation in the treatment of LC and significant health care costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed M Adil
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, US
| | - Sarah E Hodges
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, US
| | - Ryan M Edwards
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, US
| | | | - Zidanyue Yang
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, US
| | - Musa Kiyani
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, US
| | - Alexis Musick
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, US
| | - Beth A Parente
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, US
| | - Hui-Jie Lee
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, US
| | - Katherine B Peters
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, US.,The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, US
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, US.,The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, US
| | - Shivanand P Lad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, US
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Grabowski MM, Sankey EW, Srinivasan E, Griffin A, Otvos B, Olufawo M, Scott A, Kim AH, Leuthardt EC, Barnett GH, Mohammadi AM, Fecci PE. Combination Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy Plus SRS Increases Time to Progression for Recurrent SRS-Treated Brain Metastases. Neurosurgery 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa447_821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
48
|
Sankey EW, Grabowski MM, Srinavasan E, Griffin A, Howell EP, Otvos B, Tsvankin V, Atik A, Johsi K, Barnett GH, Fecci PE, Mohammadi AM. Faster Steroid Cessation After Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy Versus Medical Management in Biopsy-Proven Radiation Necrosis After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastasis. Neurosurgery 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa447_902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
49
|
Gastman B, Agarwal PK, Berger A, Boland G, Broderick S, Butterfield LH, Byrd D, Fecci PE, Ferris RL, Fong Y, Goff SL, Grabowski MM, Ito F, Lim M, Lotze MT, Mahdi H, Malafa M, Morris CD, Murthy P, Neves RI, Odunsi A, Pai SI, Prabhakaran S, Rosenberg SA, Saoud R, Sethuraman J, Skitzki J, Slingluff CL, Sondak VK, Sunwoo JB, Turcotte S, Yeung CC, Kaufman HL. Defining best practices for tissue procurement in immuno-oncology clinical trials: consensus statement from the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer Surgery Committee. J Immunother Cancer 2020; 8:e001583. [PMID: 33199512 PMCID: PMC7670953 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy is now a cornerstone for cancer treatment, and much attention has been placed on the identification of prognostic and predictive biomarkers. The success of biomarker development is dependent on accurate and timely collection of biospecimens and high-quality processing, storage and shipping. Tumors are also increasingly used as source material for the generation of therapeutic T cells. There have been few guidelines or consensus statements on how to optimally collect and manage biospecimens and source material being used for immunotherapy and related research. The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer Surgery Committee has brought together surgical experts from multiple subspecialty disciplines to identify best practices and to provide consensus on how best to access and manage specific tissues for immuno-oncology treatments and clinical investigation. In addition, the committee recommends early integration of surgeons and other interventional physicians with expertise in biospecimen collection, especially in clinical trials, to optimize the quality of tissue and the validity of correlative clinical studies in cancer immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Gastman
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Piyush K Agarwal
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Adam Berger
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Genevieve Boland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Stephen Broderick
- Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medicine Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Lisa H Butterfield
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, California, USA
- Microbiology and Immunology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - David Byrd
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Robert L Ferris
- Departments of Otolaryngology, Immunology, and Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Yuman Fong
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | | | - Matthew M Grabowski
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Fumito Ito
- Center for Immunotherapy, Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Michael Lim
- Departments of Neurosurgery, Oncology, Radiation Oncology, and Otolaryngology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Michael T Lotze
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Haider Mahdi
- OBGYN and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Mokenge Malafa
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Carol D Morris
- Division of Orthopaedic Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Pranav Murthy
- Department of Surgery, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rogerio I Neves
- Department of Surgery, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Adekunle Odunsi
- Departments of Immunology and Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Sara I Pai
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sangeetha Prabhakaran
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, UNM Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | | | - Ragheed Saoud
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | | | - Joseph Skitzki
- Departments of Surgical Oncology and Immunology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Craig L Slingluff
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Breast and Melanoma Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Vernon K Sondak
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - John B Sunwoo
- Department of Otolaryngology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Simon Turcotte
- Surgery Department, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Cecilia Cs Yeung
- Department of Pathology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Howard L Kaufman
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Immuneering Corp, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Rennert RC, Khan U, Bartek J, Tatter SB, Field M, Toyota B, Fecci PE, Judy K, Mohammadi AM, Landazuri P, Sloan AE, Kim AH, Leuthardt EC, Chen CC. Laser Ablation of Abnormal Neurological Tissue Using Robotic Neuroblate System (LAANTERN): Procedural Safety and Hospitalization. Neurosurgery 2020; 86:538-547. [PMID: 31076762 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyz141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 12/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic laser ablation (SLA) has demonstrated potential utility for a spectrum of difficult to treat neurosurgical pathologies in multiple small and/or retrospective single-institutional series. Here, we present the safety profile of SLA of intracranial lesions from the Laser Ablation of Abnormal Neurological Tissue using Robotic NeuroBlate System (LAANTERN; Monteris Medical) multi-institutional, international prospective observational registry. OBJECTIVE To determine the procedural safety of SLA for intracranial lesions. METHODS Prospective procedural safety and hospitalization data from the first 100 treated LAANTERN patients was collected and analyzed. RESULTS Mean age and baseline Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) were 51(± 17) yr and 83(± 15), respectively. In total, 81.2% of patients had undergone prior surgical or radiation treatment. Most patients had a single lesion (79%) ablated through 1 burr hole (1.2 ± 0.7 per patient), immediately following a lesion biopsy. In total, >90% of the lesion was ablated in 72% of treated lesions. Average total procedural time was 188.2 ± 69.6 min, and average blood loss was 17.7 ± 55.6 ccs. The average length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays before discharge were 38.1 ± 62.7 h and 61.1 ± 87.2 h, respectively. There were 5 adverse events (AEs) attributable to SLA (5/100; 5%). After the procedure, 84.8% of patients were discharged home. There was 1 mortality within 30 d of the procedure (1/100; 1%), which was not attributable to SLA. CONCLUSION SLA is a safe, minimally invasive procedure with favorable postprocedural ICU and hospital utilization profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert C Rennert
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Usman Khan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Jiri Bartek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stephen B Tatter
- Department of Neurosurgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | | | - Brian Toyota
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kevin Judy
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Alireza M Mohammadi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Patrick Landazuri
- Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Andrew E Sloan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Albert H Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Eric C Leuthardt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Clark C Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|