Taroza S, Burkauskas J, Mickuviene N, Kazukauskiene N, Podlipskyte A. Psychometrics and validation of the EQ-5D-5L instrument in individuals with ischemic stroke in Lithuania.
Front Psychol 2023;
14:1284859. [PMID:
38125861 PMCID:
PMC10731357 DOI:
10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1284859]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background
Experiencing stroke is associated with deterioration in health-related quality of life (HRQL). One of the generic tools used for HRQL assessment is the EuroQol instrument of five dimensions and five levels (EQ-5D-5L), which has not yet been validated in Lithuania. This study aimed to evaluate validity, reliability, and factor structure of the EQ-5D-5L instrument in a sample of Lithuanian individuals at the end of the first week after experiencing ischemic stroke (IS).
Methods
The study had a cross-sectional design, including 134 individuals [61.9% men and 38.1% women; median (IQR) age was 66 years (59-73) years, in the final analysis]. Alongside the EQ-5D-5L, psychological distress was evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment-7 (GAD-7); neurological impairment with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS); and functional independence with the Barthel index (BI). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed for validation of the factor structure.
Results
The internal consistency of the EQ-5D-5L instrument was 0.81. A significant ceiling effect (17.2%) of the descriptive part of the EQ-5D-5L was detected. The convergent validity of the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system was confirmed, with significant correlations with the other scales used, except for the visual analog scale. The two-factor ("physical" and "emotional") model was confirmed by CFA, with acceptable fit [root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.045, RMSEA 90% CI = 0.000-0.145; comparative fit indices (CFI) = 0.996; non-normal fit index (NFI) = 0.983; Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.936; χ2/df = 1.27)].
Conclusion
This study provides information on the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L instrument in Lithuanian individuals, showing that the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system is a reliable and valid tool for HRQL assessment. The Lithuanian version of the descriptive part of the EQ-5D-5L instrument is best expressed as a two-factor model, estimating the physical and emotional dimensions of HRQL in individuals who have experienced IS.
Collapse