Short and long-term prognostic value of intraoperative motor evoked potentials in brain tumor patients: a case series of 121 brain tumor patients

Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for the Lower-Extremity Region Using Motor-Evoked Potential With Direct Cortical Stimulation in Brain Tumor Surgeries

PURPOSE

To evaluate the motor function of the lower extremity (LE), we used direct cortical stimulation motor-evoked potential (D-MEP) monitoring with a single six-contact subdural strip electrode placed in the interhemispheric fissure.

METHODS

Intraoperative neuromonitoring using D-MEPs in the LE was performed in 18 cases (16 patients) for brain tumor surgery from December 2018 to April 2023 with a follow-up period of at least 3 months. After dural opening, a single six-contact subdural strip electrode was placed inside the interhemispheric fissure. To identify the central sulcus, phase reversal was recorded using somatosensory evoked potentials. Next, direct cortical stimulation was applied to the primary motor cortex. The baseline waveform was defined as a reproducible waveform of 30 µV or higher, and a significant decrease of ≥50% in the amplitude resulted in a warning during surgery.

RESULTS

The success rate of central sulcus identification in the LE was 66.7% (12/18 cases). Direct cortical stimulation motor-evoked potential monitoring could record stable contralateral motor-evoked potentials of the tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius, and abductor hallucis in 16 of 18 cases (88.9%). The mean intensity of stimulation for D-MEPs was 20.5 ± 9.9 mA, and the 16 cases showed no significant reduction in amplitude. Seventeen cases showed no deterioration of motor function of the LE at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. In the remaining case with unsuccessful D-MEP, paralysis of the LE worsened at 1 and 3 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The placement of electrodes in the interhemispheric fissure on the primary motor cortex of the LE enabled motor-function monitoring in the LE with D-MEPs, suggesting that D-MEP-based monitoring may be a reliable approach.

Effect of dexmedetomidine on somatosensory- and motor-evoked potentials in patients receiving craniotomy under propofol-sevoflurane combined anesthesia

Introduction

Dexmedetomidine is often used as an adjunct to total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) for procedures requiring intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM). However, it has been reported that dexmedetomidine might mask the warning of a neurological deficit on intraoperative monitoring.

Methods

We reviewed the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring data of 47 patients who underwent surgery and IONM from March 2019 to March 2021 at the Department of Neurosurgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. Pre- and postoperative motor function scores were recorded and analyzed. Dexmedetomidine was administered intravenously at 0.5 μg/kg/h 40 min after anesthesia and discontinued after 1 h in the dexmedetomidine group.

Results

We found that the amplitude of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tce-MEPs) was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the negative control group (P < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in the somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) amplitude or the Tce-MEPs or SSEPs latency. There was no significant decrease in postoperative motor function in the dexmedetomidine group compared with the preoperative group, suggesting that there is no evidence that dexmedetomidine affects patient prognosis. In addition, we noticed a synchronized bilateral decrease in the Tce-MEPs amplitude in the dexmedetomidine group and a mostly unilateral decrease on the side of the brain injury in the positive control group (P = 0.001).

Discussion

Although dexmedetomidine does not affect the prognosis of patients undergoing craniotomy, the potential risks and benefits of applying it as an adjunctive medication during craniotomy should be carefully evaluated. When dexmedetomidine is administered, Tce-MEPs should be monitored. When a decrease in the Tce-MEPs amplitude is detected, the cause of the decrease in the MEPs amplitude can be indirectly determined by whether the decrease is bilateral.

Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Neurosurgery

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is a crucial advancement in neurosurgery, enhancing procedural safety and precision. This technique involves continuous real-time assessment of neurophysiological signals, aiding surgeons in timely interventions to protect neural structures. In addition to inherent limitations, IONM necessitates a detailed anesthetic plan for accurate signal recording. Given the growing importance of IONM in neurosurgery, we conducted a narrative review including the most relevant studies about the modalities and their application in different fields of neurosurgery. In particular, this review provides insights for all physicians and healthcare professionals unfamiliar with IONM, elucidating commonly used techniques in neurosurgery. In particular, it discusses the roles of IONM in various neurosurgical settings such as tumoral brain resection, neurovascular surgery, epilepsy surgery, spinal surgery, and peripheral nerve surgery. Furthermore, it offers an overview of the anesthesiologic strategies and limitations of techniques essential for the effective implementation of IONM.

Influence of Preoperative Motor Score and Patient Comorbidities on Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potential Acquisition in Intracranial Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring plays a pivotal role in modern neurosurgery, aiding in real-time assessment of eloquent neural structures to mitigate iatrogenic neural injury. This study represents the largest retrospective series to date in monitoring corticospinal tract integrity during intracranial surgery with transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TCMEPs), focusing on the influence of demographic factors, comorbidities, and preoperative motor deficits on the reliability of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. While the impact of patient-specific factors affecting TCMEP monitoring in spine surgery is well-documented, similar insights for intracranial surgery are lacking.

METHODS

A total of 420 craniotomy patients were retrospectively analyzed from electronic medical records from December 2017 to February 2023, excluding patients without preoperative Medical Research Council scores or medical histories. Using intrinsic hand muscles as a robust data set, 840 hand TCMEPs acquired during intracranial surgery were assessed. Demographic and clinical factors, including preoperative motor scores, were analyzed to identify associations with TCMEP acquisition and amplitude. Nonparametric statistics and multivariate regression analysis were employed.

RESULTS

TCMEPs were successfully acquired in 734 (87.7%) patient hands, even in the presence of preoperative motor deficits in 13.9% of total patient hands. Preoperative motor scores did not predict the ability to acquire baseline TCMEPs (P = .6). Notably, older age (P < .001) and hypertension (P = .01) were independent predictors of lower TCMEP acquisition rates. Preoperative motor scores significantly influenced TCMEP amplitudes, with higher scores correlating with higher amplitudes (1771 [SD = 1550] eve vs 882 [SD = 856] μV, P < .0001). Older age (P < .001) and chronic kidney disease (P = .04) were also associated with reduced TCMEP amplitudes.

CONCLUSION

Our investigation into TCMEPs during intracranial surgery demonstrated a notably high acquisition rate in hand muscles, irrespective of preoperative motor deficits. Preoperative motor scores reliably correlated with TCMEP amplitudes in a linear fashion while advanced age and renal disease emerged as independent predictors of lower TCMEP amplitudes.

The Utility of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring in Predicting Postoperative Supplementary Motor Area Syndrome and Motor Function Recovery

BACKGROUND

Postoperative hemiparesis following frontal lobe lesion resection is alarming, and predicting motor function recovery is challenging. Supplementary motor area (SMA) syndrome following resection of frontal lobe lesions is often indistinguishable from postoperative motor deficit due to surgical injury of motor tracts. We aimed to describe the use of intraoperative transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) with motor evoked potential monitoring data as a diagnostic tool to distinguish between SMA syndrome and permanent motor deficit (PMD).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 235 patients undergoing craniotomy and resection with TES-MEP monitoring for a frontal lobe lesion was performed. Patients who developed immediate postoperative motor deficit were included. Motor deficit and TES-MEP findings were categorized by muscle group as left upper extremity, left lower extremity, right upper extremity, or right lower extremity. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the predictive value of stable TES-MEP for SMA syndrome versus PMD.

RESULTS

This study included 20 patients comprising 29 cases of immediate postoperative motor deficit by muscle group. Of these, 27 cases resolved and were diagnosed as SMA syndrome, and 2 cases progressed to PMD. TES-MEP stability was significantly associated with diagnosis of SMA syndrome (P = 0.015). TES-MEP showed excellent diagnostic utility with a sensitivity and positive predictive value of 100% and 92.6%, respectively. Negative predictive value was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Temporary SMA syndrome is difficult to distinguish from PMD immediately postoperatively. TES-MEP may be a useful intraoperative adjunct that may aid in distinguishing SMA syndrome from PMD secondary to surgical injury.