The Effect and Mechanism of LINC00663 on the Biological Behavior of Glioma

The prognostic value of sialylation-related long non-coding RNAs in lung adenocarcinoma

There has been increasing interest in the role of epigenetic modification in cancers recently. Among the various modifications, sialylation has emerged as a dominant subtype implicated in tumor progression, metastasis, immune evasion, and chemoresistance. The prognostic significance of sialylation-related molecules has been demonstrated in colorectal cancer. However, the potential roles and regulatory mechanisms of sialylation in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) have not been thoroughly investigated. Through Pearson correlation, univariate Cox hazards proportional regression, and random survival forest model analyses, we identified several prognostic long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) associated with aberrant sialylation and tumor progression, including LINC00857, LINC00968, LINC00663, and ITGA9-AS1. Based on the signatures of four lncRNAs, we classified patients into two clusters with different landscapes using a non-negative matrix factorization approach. Collectively, patients in Cluster 1 (C1) exhibited worse prognoses than those in Cluster 2 (C2), as well as heavier tumor mutation burden. Functional enrichment analysis showed the enrichment of several pro-tumor pathways in C1, differing from the upregulated Longevity and programmed cell death pathways in C2. Moreover, we profiled immune infiltration levels of important immune cell lineages in two subgroups using MCPcounter scores and single sample gene set enrichment analysis scores, revealing a relatively immunosuppressive microenvironment in C1. Risk analysis indicated that LINC00857 may serve as a pro-tumor regulator, while the other three lncRNAs may be protective contributors. Consistently, we observed upregulated LINC00857 in C1, whereas increased expressive levels of LINC00968, LINC00663, and ITGA9-AS1 were observed in C2. Finally, drug sensitivity analysis suggested that patients in the two groups may benefit from different therapeutic strategies, contributing to precise treatment in LUAD. By integrating multi-omics data, we identified four core sialylation-related lncRNAs and successfully established a prognostic model to distinguish patients with different characterizations. These findings may provide some insights into the underlying mechanism of sialylation, and offer a new stratification way as well as clinical guidance in LUAD.

Challenges for the development of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenases 1 inhibitors to treat glioma

Glioma is one of the most common types of brain tumors, and its high recurrence and mortality rates threaten human health. In 2008, the frequent isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations in glioma were reported, which brought a new strategy in the treatment of this challenging disease. In this perspective, we first discuss the possible gliomagenesis after IDH1 mutations (mIDH1). Subsequently, we systematically investigate the reported mIDH1 inhibitors and present a comparative analysis of the ligand-binding pocket in mIDH1. Additionally, we also discuss the binding features and physicochemical properties of different mIDH1 inhibitors to facilitate the future development of mIDH1 inhibitors. Finally, we discuss the possible selectivity features of mIDH1 inhibitors against WT-IDH1 and IDH2 by combining protein-based and ligand-based information. We hope that this perspective can inspire the development of mIDH1 inhibitors and bring potent mIDH1 inhibitors for the treatment of glioma.

Enhanced E6AP-mediated ubiquitination of ENO1 via LINC00663 contributes to radiosensitivity of breast cancer by regulating mitochondrial homeostasis

Radiotherapy has shown measurable efficacy in breast cancer (BC). Elucidating the mechanisms and developing effective strategies against resistance, which is a major challenge, is crucial. Mitochondria, which regulate homeostasis of the redox environment, have emerged as a radiotherapeutic target. However, the mechanism via which mitochondria are controlled under radiation remains elusive. Here, we identified alpha-enolase (ENO1), as a prognostic marker for the efficacy of BC radiotherapy. ENO1 enhances radio-therapeutic resistance in BC via reducing the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and apoptosis in vitro and in vivo through modulation of mitochondrial homeostasis. Moreover, LINC00663 was identified as an upstream regulator of ENO1, which regulates radiotherapeutic sensitivity by downregulating ENO1 expression in BC cells. LINC00663 regulates ENO1 protein stability by enhancing the E6AP-mediated ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. In BC patients, LINC00663 expression is negatively correlated with ENO1 expression. Among patients treated with IR, those who did not respond to radiotherapy expressed lower levels of LINC00663 than those sensitive to radiotherapy. Our work established LINC00663/ENO1 critical to regulate IR-resistance in BC. Inhibition of ENO1 with a specific inhibitor or supplement of LINC00663 could be potential sensitizing therapeutic strategies for BC.

The Fibrotic Effects of LINC00663 in Human Hepatic Stellate LX-2 Cells and in Bile Duct-Ligated Cholestasis Mice Are Mediated through the Splicing Factor 2-Fibronectin

Hepatic fibrosis can develop into cirrhosis or even cancer without active therapy at an early stage. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been shown to be involved in the regulation of a wide variety of important biological processes. However, lncRNA mechanism(s) involved in cholestatic liver fibrosis remain unclear. RNA sequence data of hepatic stellate cells from bile duct ligation (BDL) mice or controls were analyzed by weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). Based on WGCNA analysis, a competing endogenous RNA network was constructed. We identified LINC00663 and evaluated its function using a panel of assays, including a wound healing assay, a dual-luciferase reporter assay, RNA binding protein immunoprecipitation and chromatin immunoprecipitation. Functional research showed that LINC00663 promoted the activation, migration and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of LX-2 cells and liver fibrosis in BDL mice. Mechanistically, LINC00663 regulated splicing factor 2 (SF2)-fibronectin (FN) alternative splicing through the sponging of hsa-miR-3916. Moreover, forkhead box A1 (FOXA1) specifically interacted with the promoter of LINC00663. In summary, we elaborated the fibrotic effects of LINC00663 in human hepatic stellate LX-2 cells and in bile duct-ligated cholestasis mice. We established a FOXA1/LINC00663/hsa-miR-3916/SF2-FN axis that provided a potential target for the diagnosis and targeted therapy of cholestatic liver fibrosis.

Identification and Validation of Apparent Imbalanced Epi-lncRNAs Prognostic Model Based on Multi-Omics Data in Pancreatic Cancer

Background: Globally, pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a recognized cause of pancreatic death (PAAD) associated with high mortality. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play an important role in several biological processes in pancreatic cancer.

Methods: The gene expression profile of PAAD patients were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The limma package was used to identify epigenetic disorders of lncRNAs and PCG. Subsequently, the genomic characteristics and landscape of lncRNAs were explored. The pancreatic cancer-related lncRNAs gene set from Lnc2Cancer v3.0 were collected and the difference between cancer samples and normal samples were analysed. A prognostic model consisting of five epigenetic lncRNA (epi-lncRNAs) was established by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses and was verified across different data sets. Finally, the expression of core epi-lncRNAs was identified by PCR experiment.

Results: A total of 2237 epi-lncRNAs, 11855 non-epi-lncRNAs, 13518 epi-PCGs, and 6097 non-epi-PCGs, were identified. The abnormal frequency of lncRNAs in pancreatic cancer was much lower than that in PCG, and 138 epi-lncRNAs were enriched in human cancer-related lncRNAs. Epi-lncRNAs had a higher number with longer lengths and a greater number of transcripts. Epi-lncRNAs associated with epigenetic disorders had a higher number of exons, gene length, and isomers as compared to non-epi-lncRNAs. Further, the five pancreatic cancer-specific epi-lncRNA genes (AL161431.1, LINC00663, LINC00941, SNHG10, and TM4SF1-AS1) were identified. Based on these five pancreatic cancer-specific epis-lncRNAs, a prognostic model for pancreatic cancer was established. The RT-PCR result confirmed that AL161431.1, LINC00663, LINC00941, and SNHG10 expressions in pancreatic cancer samples were higher as compared to normal pancreatic samples; the expression of TM4SF1-AS1 in pancreatic cancer cells was significantly lower than that in normal pancreatic samples.

Conclusions: Epigenetic abnormalities could promote abnormal lncRNA expression in pancreatic cancer and may play an important role in its progression.