Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of opioid-induced gastrointestinal side effects in patients receiving tapentadol IR and oxycodone IR

Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Tapentadol Immediate Release in Bunionectomy: A Meta-Analysis

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the analgesic effect of different doses of tapentadol immediate release (IR) and its adverse effects after a bunionectomy. Pubmed, Cochrane, Lilacs, Medline, and Imbiomed were used to identify abstracts of scientific publications related to the keywords of this systematic review (PROSPERO ID CRD42023437295). Moreover, the risk of bias in all included articles was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. Data on the sum of pain intensity, total pain relief, global assessment, and adverse effects were extracted. The statistical method of inverse variance with means difference was used to evaluate the numerical data and the Mantel-Haenszel and Odd Ratio test to analyze the dichotomous data. In addition, the number needed to treat, the number needed to harm, and the 95% confidence intervals were calculated. A qualitative evaluation (n = 2381) was carried out according to the conclusions of the authors. Tapentadol (n = 1772) was more effective in relieving postoperative pain than the placebo (n = 609) after a bunionectomy. In addition, the analgesic efficacy of IR tapentadol (n = 1323) versus the placebo (n = 390) was evaluated in a total of 1713 patients using a global evaluation of the treatments. All three doses of IR tapentadol showed better results compared to the placebo after a bunionectomy. Finally, the adverse effects have a direct relationship with the dose, and the greatest number of adverse effects are most observed with tapentadol IR 100 mg (n = 2381). It is concluded that tapentadol IR (100 mg) leads to the best satisfaction score in this meta-analysis.

Oral Oxycodone-Induced Respiratory Depression during Normocapnia and Hypercapnia: A Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling Study

The widely prescribed opioid oxycodone may cause lethal respiratory depression. We compared the effects of oxycodone on breathing and antinociception in healthy young volunteers. After pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling, we constructed utility functions to combine the wanted and unwanted end points into a single function. We hypothesized that the function would be predominantly negative over the tested oxycodone concentration range. Twenty-four male and female volunteers received 20 (n = 12) or 40 (n = 12) mg oral oxycodone immediate-release tablets. Hypercapnic ventilatory responses (visit 1) or responses to 3 nociceptive assays (pain pressure, electrical, and thermal tests; visit 2) were measured at regular intervals for 7 hours. the PK/PD analyses, that included carbon dioxide kinetics, stood at the basis of the utility function: probability of antinociception minus probability of respiratory depression. Oxycodone had rapid onset/offset times (30-40 minutes) with potency values (effect-site concentration causing 50% of effect) ranging from 0.05 to 0.13 ng/mL for respiratory variables obtained at hypercapnia and antinociceptive responses. Ventilation at an extrapolated end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure of 55 mmHg, was used for creation of 3 utility functions, one for each of the nociceptive tests. Contrary to expectation, the utility functions were close to zero or positive over the clinical oxycodone concentration range. The similar or better likelihood for antinociception relative to respiratory depression may be related to oxycodone's receptor activation profile or to is high likeability that possibly alters the modulation of nociceptive input. Oxycodone differs from other μ-opioids, such as fentanyl, that have a consistent negative utility.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Oxycodone and Metabolites in Patients with Cancer-Related Pain

Simple Summary

Patients with moderate to severe cancer-related pain are frequently treated with oxycodone, a strong-acting opioid. However, treatment with oxycodone does not always lead to sufficient analgesic action. In order to determine which factors affect treatment outcomes, we performed an observational study and developed a population pharmacokinetic model. The model described oxycodone, nor-oxycodone and nor-oxymorphone pharmacokinetics. The association between oxycodone or oxycodone metabolites’ exposure with pain scores and adverse events was not significant. The combined oxycodone, nor-oxycodone and nor-oxymorphone model is a good starting point for further unravelling the factors that affect the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relation of oxycodone and its metabolites.

Abstract

Oxycodone is frequently used for treating cancer-related pain, while not much is known about the factors that influence treatment outcomes in these patients. We aim to unravel these factors by developing a population-pharmacokinetic model to assess the pharmacokinetics of oxycodone and its metabolites in cancer patients, and to associate this with pain scores, and adverse events. Hospitalized patients with cancer-related pain, who were treated with oral oxycodone, could participate. Pharmacokinetic samples and patient-reported pain scores and occurrence and severity of nine adverse events were taken every 12 h. In 28 patients, 302 pharmacokinetic samples were collected. A one-compartment model for oxycodone and each metabolite best described oxycodone, nor-oxycodone, and nor-oxymorphone pharmacokinetics. Furthermore, oxycodone exposure was not associated with average and maximal pain scores, and oxycodone, nor-oxycodone, and nor-oxymorphone exposure were not associated with adverse events (all p > 0.05). This is the first model to describe the pharmacokinetics of oxycodone including the metabolites nor-oxycodone and nor-oxymorphone in hospitalized patients with cancer pain. Additional research, including more patients and a more timely collection of pharmacodynamic data, is needed to further elucidate oxycodone (metabolite) pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships. This model is an important starting point for further studies to optimize oxycodone dosing regiments in patients with cancer-related pain.

Pharmacokinetic Analysis, Analgesic Effects, and Adverse Effects of Tapentadol in Cancer Patients with Pain

In this study, we conducted a pharmacokinetic analysis of tapentadol (TP) in Japanese patients with cancer pain and identified covariates influencing pharmacokinetic parameters. In addition, the analgesic effects and adverse effects of TP were investigated. Data were collected from in-patients with cancer pain who had been administered TP as an extended-release formula. The median (range) estimated clearance (CL/F) and distribution volume (V_d/F) of TP were 86.7 (31.3-213.7) L/h and 1288 (189-6736) L, respectively. There was a strong negative correlation between CL/F and age, Child-Pugh score, and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score. The subjects were further divided into two groups according to the factors highly correlated with CL/F. The CL/F of patients in the Child-Pugh B group was 0.46-times that of patients in the Child-Pugh A group. In addition, the CL/F of patients with an ALBI score > -2.40 was 0.56-times that of patients with ALBI scores ≤-2.40, and both differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The mean intensity of pain over 24 h was investigated daily from before starting TP for the first 7 d of the treatment. TP reduced pain in six of nine patients; the mean pain visual analogue scale score decreased significantly from 59.2 mm before administration to 42.5 mm at days 5-7. Overall, the Child-Pugh and ALBI scores significantly affected the clearance of TP, which was reduced in patients with impaired liver function. These results suggest that TP is an opioid with a sufficient analgesic effect for cancer patients.

Tapentadol Extended Release in the Treatment of Severe Chronic Low Back Pain and Osteoarthritis Pain

Tapentadol is a novel pain reliever with apparently synergistic dual mechanisms of action, capable of addressing both nociceptive and neuropathic components of chronic pain. As an effective analgesic with good tolerability, tapentadol may be appropriate for patients suffering from severe chronic pain associated with low back pain (LBP) or osteoarthritis (OA). Efficacy studies of tapentadol in populations of patients with severe chronic LBP or OA pain suggest that tapentadol is non-inferior to oxycodone. Its tolerability, especially with respect to gastrointestinal (GI) side effects, may be better than that of other strong opioids in clinical trials and analyses of multiple trials. Patient satisfaction with tapentadol extended release for chronic noncancer pain syndromes is good. Although tapentadol has an opioid component with abuse liability, it appears to be a difficult opioid for tampering with less appeal to abusers than other opioids. For patients with severe LBP and OA pain, tapentadol appears to hold promise as a safe, effective therapeutic option.

European Pain Federation position paper on appropriate opioid use in chronic pain management

Poorly controlled pain is a global public health issue. The personal, familial and societal costs are immeasurable. Only a minority of European patients have access to a comprehensive specialist pain clinic. More commonly the responsibility for chronic pain management and initiating opioid therapy rests with the primary care physician and other non‐specialist opioid prescribers. There is much confusing and conflicting information available to non‐specialist prescribers regarding opioid therapy and a great deal of unjustified fear is generated. Opioid therapy should only be initiated by competent clinicians as part of a multi‐faceted treatment programme in circumstances where more simple measures have failed. Throughout, all patients must be kept under close clinical surveillance. As with any other medical therapy, if the treatment fails to yield the desired results and/or the patient is additionally burdened by an unacceptable level of adverse effects, the overall management strategy must be reviewed and revised. No responsible clinician will wish to pursue a failed treatment strategy or persist with an ineffective and burdensome treatment. In a considered attempt to empower and inform non‐specialist opioid prescribers, EFIC convened a European group of experts, drawn from a diverse range of basic science and relevant clinical disciplines, to prepare a position paper on appropriate opioid use in chronic pain. The expert panel reviewed the available literature and harnessed the experience of many years of clinical practice to produce these series of recommendations. Its success will be judged on the extent to which it contributes to an improved pain management experience for chronic pain patients across Europe.

Significance

This position paper provides expert recommendations for primary care physicians and other non‐ specialist healthcare professionals in Europe, particularly those who do not have ready access to specialists in pain medicine, on the safe and appropriate use of opioid medications as part of a multi‐faceted approach to pain management, in properly selected and supervised patients.

Opioid-Induced Constipation and Bowel Dysfunction: A Clinical Guideline

OBJECTIVE

To formulate timely evidence-based guidelines for the management of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction.

SETTING

Constipation is a major untoward effect of opioids. Increasing prescription of opioids has correlated to increased incidence of opioid-induced constipation. However, the inhibitory effects of opioids are not confined to the colon, but also affect higher segments of the gastrointestinal tract, leading to the coining of the term "opioid-induced bowel dysfunction."

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using Medline, EMBASE, and EMBASE Classic, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Predefined search terms and inclusion/exclusion criteria were used to identify and categorize relevant papers. A series of statements were formulated and justified by a comment, then labeled with the degree of agreement and their level of evidence as judged by the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) system.

RESULTS

From a list of 10,832 potentially relevant studies, 33 citations were identified for review. Screening the reference lists of the pertinent papers identified additional publications. Current definitions, prevalence, and mechanism of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction were reviewed, and a treatment algorithm and statements regarding patient management were developed to provide guidance on clinical best practice in the management of patients with opioid-induced constipation and opioid-induced bowel dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

In recent years, more insight has been gained in the pathophysiology of this "entity"; new treatment approaches have been developed, but guidelines on clinical best practice are still lacking. Current knowledge is insufficient regarding management of the opioid side effects on the upper gastrointestinal tract, but recommendations can be derived from what we know at present.

Considering tapentadol as a first-line analgesic: 14 questions

Tapentadol is the newest centrally acting analgesic to be approved by the US FDA and regulatory bodies in other countries. It has been called the first-in-class of a novel-acting analgesic mechanism of action that combines µ-opioid receptor agonist activity with neuronal norepinephrine-reuptake inhibition in a single molecule. This duality of action should combine inhibition of ascending (afferent) pain-transmitting signals with activation of descending (efferent) pain-attenuating systems (e.g., diffuse noxious inhibitory controls). However, not all novel mechanisms of action impart the characteristics needed for an analgesic to be considered for first-line therapy. These key questions may help inform clinical decision making.

Population pharmacometrics in support of analgesics studies

Population pharmacometric modeling is used to explain both population trends as well as the sources and magnitude of variability in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics data; the later, in part, by taking into account patient characteristics such as weight, age, renal function and genetics. The approach is best known for its ability to analyze sparse data, i.e. when only a few measurements have been collected from each subject, but other benefits include its flexibility and the potential to construct more detailed models than those used in the traditional individual curve fitting approach. This review presents the basic concepts of population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling and includes several analgesic drug examples. In addition, the use of these models to design and optimize future studies is discussed. In this context, finding the best design factors, such as the sampling times or the dose, for future studies within pre-defined criteria using a previously constructed population pharmacokinetic model can help researchers acquire clinically meaningful data without wasting resources and unnecessarily exposing vulnerable patient groups to study drugs and additional blood sampling.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2012

This paper is the thirty-fifth consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system. It summarizes papers published during 2012 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior (Section 2), and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia (Section 3); stress and social status (Section 4); tolerance and dependence (Section 5); learning and memory (Section 6); eating and drinking (Section 7); alcohol and drugs of abuse (Section 8); sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (Section 9); mental illness and mood (Section 10); seizures and neurologic disorders (Section 11); electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (Section 12); general activity and locomotion (Section 13); gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (Section 14); cardiovascular responses (Section 15); respiration and thermoregulation (Section 16); and immunological responses (Section 17).

Opioid induced nausea and vomiting

Opioids are broad spectrum analgesics that are an integral part of the therapeutic armamentarium to combat pain in the palliative care population. Unfortunately, among the adverse effects of opioids that may be experienced along with analgesia is nausea, vomiting, and/or retching. Although it is conceivable that in the future, using combination agents (opioids combined with agents which may nullify emetic effects), currently nausea/vomiting remains a significant issue for certain patients. However, there exists potential current strategies that may be useful in efforts to diminish the frequency and/or intensity of opioid-induced nausea/vomiting (OINV).